Fish Sense Fish Depend on Their Senses for Survival

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fish Sense Fish Depend on Their Senses for Survival Chapter 2 • Lesson 1 Fish Sense Fish depend on their senses for survival. Whether they eat a meal or become a meal depends on their ability to see, hear, smell, taste, and detect vibrations. © 2010 Minnesota DNR • MinnAqua • USFWS Sport Fish Restoration 2:1-B Chapter 2 • Lesson 1 • Fish Sense Table of Contents Fish Sense ............................................................................2:1-A Minnesota Academic Standards ............................................... 2:1-C Environmental Literacy Scope and Sequence .......................... 2:1-C Instructor’s Background Information .....................................2:1-1-4 Summary ................................................................................... 2:1-1 Student Objectives .................................................................... 2:1-1 Materials .................................................................................... 2:1-1 Activity ...................................................................................... 2:1-5 Procedure ................................................................................... 2:1-5 Assessment Options .................................................................. 2:1-9 Checklist .............................................................................. 2:1-10 Scoring Rubric ..................................................................... 2:1-11 Extensions .............................................................................. 2:1-12 K-2 Option .............................................................................. 2:1-13 Fish Senses Sheets ................................................................... 2:1-14 Fish Anatomy Sheet ................................................................ 2:1-19 © 2010 Minnesota DNR • MinnAqua • USFWS Sport Fish Restoration Chapter 2 • Lesson 1 • Fish Sense 2:1-C Chapter 2 • Lesson 1 Fish Sense Minnesota Academic Standards Science Lesson introduces this Benchmark. Grade 3 Lesson partially addresses this Benchmark. IV. Life Science Lesson fully addresses this Benchmark. B. Diversity of Organisms: Benchmark 1—The student will describe the Language Arts structures that serve different functions in growth, survival and reproduction for plants and animals. Grades 3, 4, 5 C. Interdependence of Life: I. Reading and Literature Benchmark 1—The student will know that B. Vocabulary Expansion: organisms interact with one another in various ways Benchmark 1—The student will acquire, understand besides providing food. and use new vocabulary through explicit instruction Grade 4 and independent reading. G. Human Organism: III. Speaking Listening, and Viewing Benchmark 1—The student will understand that A. Speaking and Listening: humans have structures that serve functions in Benchmark 1—The student will participate in growth, survival and reproduction. and follow agreed-upon rules for conversation and formal discussions in large and small groups. Environmental Literacy Scope and Benchmark 2—The student will demonstrate active Sequence listening and comprehension. Benchmarks Social Studies • Social and natural systems are made of parts. (PreK-2) Grades K—3 • Social and natural systems may not continue III. World History to function if some of their parts are missing. A. Family Life Today and In the Past: (PreK-2) Benchmark 3—Students will compare technologies • When the parts of social and natural systems are from earlier times and today, and identify the impact put together, they can do things they couldn’t do of invention on historical change. (Lesson by themselves. (PreK-2) provides a specific example of technological change • In social and natural systems that consist of concerning recording fish catches.) many parts, the parts usually influence one another. (3-5) • Social and natural systems may not function as well if parts are missing, damaged, mismatched or misconnected. (3-5) For the full Environmental Literacy Scope and Sequence, see: www.seek.state.mn.us/eemn_c.cfm © 2010 Minnesota DNR • MinnAqua • USFWS Sport Fish Restoration 2:1-D Chapter 2 • Lesson 1 • Fish Sense This page left blank intentionally. © 2010 Minnesota DNR • MinnAqua • USFWS Sport Fish Restoration Chapter 2 • Lesson 1 • Fish Sense 2:1-1 Chapter 2 • Lesson 1 Summary Students touch and hold a fish Fish Sense (or a rubber replica of a fish) to explore the six senses of fish and Grade Level: 3-5 gain a better understanding of Activity Duration: 45 minutes fish behavior. They compare and Group Size: any contrast their own senses with Subject Areas: Expressive Arts, Language Arts, Social Studies, Science those of fish. When students Academic Skills: observing, comparison, painting have become comfortable with Setting: indoor or outdoor gathering area with tables handling fish, they apply paint Vocabulary: barbel, gyotaku, lateral line, nostrils, senses, school to a fish and print its image on a Internet Search Words: AmeriCorps Water Stewards Project, fish sheet of paper using the ancient prints, fish senses, gyotaku; on the Minnesota DNR website: fish sense Japanese art form of gyotaku Instructor’s Background Information (gee-oh-tah-koo). Student Objectives Six Senses Versus Five Senses are mechanisms that help organisms perceive their surroundings The students will: and survive in their environments. People experience the world around 1 Locate sense organs on a fish them using five senses. Fish have six senses. Human senses share specimen and name the six some similarities with fish senses, but because people and fish live in senses of fish. different environments—land versus water—there are differences, too. 2 Describe the functions of the In addition to taste, smell, sight, hearing, and touch, fish have a unique six fish senses. sensory structure, known as a lateral line, which enables them to sense 3 Compare and contrast human vibrations in the water. The lateral line is referred to as the sixth sense senses with fish senses. of fish, and is an extension of their sense of hearing. 4 Create a fish print. 5 Describe how anglers can Good Taste reduce the chances that fish Fish have a sense of taste and use it, in conjunction with their other will detect their presence. senses, to find food. Some fish, such as catfish and sturgeon, rely primarily on their sense of taste to find food. Materials Like people, fish have tongues containing thousands of taste buds. • Whole fish with scales Some fish, such as walleye, also have taste buds on their lips and faces. (sunfish, perch, or other fish), A walleye can taste a fishing lure without ever opening its mouth. one per student, if possible Sometimes walleye anglers say they feel a “bump,” without getting a (Catch the fish or purchase bite. That bump may have been a finicky fish tasting the lure with its fresh or frozen fish from a face rather than its tongue. grocery store. Or use rubber fish replicas available from Imagine tasting a chocolate sundae with your whole body! If you were a arts and crafts and nature catfish, you could do just that—catfish and bullheads have taste buds on supply catalogs.) their bodies from head to tail. They also have whiskers, called barbels. • Fish Senses Sheets (you may These barbels look like stingers, but they’re not. They’re actually soft, post or project these if you whiskerlike structures above and below the mouth. Barbels are sensory wish) structures containing many nerve endings, some of which are similar • Paper plates, one per fish to the taste buds of humans. Catfish, carp, and other “whiskered” fish • Paintbrushes, one per student drag their barbels along the lake or river bottom to find food. When (or a few paintbrushes for the barbels touch a tasty object—perhaps a dough ball, chicken liver, or each paint color) stinkbait on the end of your line—the fish stops and takes a bite. continued © 2010 Minnesota DNR • MinnAqua • USFWS Sport Fish Restoration 2:1-2 Chapter 2 • Lesson 1 • Fish Sense Materials (continued) Nosy Fish Fish use their noses for smelling rather than breathing. With its • Washable tempera paint or nostrils, usually two openings on either side of the snout, a fish can any opaque washable paint, smell food from great distances. The fish swims to the source of the several colors smell and uses its taste buds to find out if it’s edible. • Containers for paint and water Fish also use taste and smell for navigation. After swimming hundreds • Large bucket of water for of miles to and from the sea, salmon use their senses of taste and washing paint from fish, or a smell to find the stream where they were born. They then swim up this supply of wet wipes if water stream to their spawning area to lay and fertilize eggs. isn’t available (but the water bucket is better) Fish use their noses to sense danger, too. In fact, many fish can smell • Paper or newsprint for fish people. They will swim away from any bait that smells like hand lotion, prints perfume, deodorant, tobacco, gasoline, or insect repellent. • Newspapers, to protect tables • Paper towels and rags Fish Eyes • Fish Anatomy Sheet Fish don’t see as clearly as people do. Even in clear water, most freshwater • Small aquarium or fishbowl fish usually can see no further than fifteen feet. Like people, fish can see with live goldfish, one for brightness and color. Some fish, such as shallow-water fish, can detect each group of four or five most colors seen by humans, although many fish can’t see a full range of students (optional) colors. For example, walleyes see primarily orange and green. • Fish food (optional)
Recommended publications
  • BONY FISHES 602 Bony Fishes
    click for previous page BONY FISHES 602 Bony Fishes GENERAL REMARKS by K.E. Carpenter, Old Dominion University, Virginia, USA ony fishes constitute the bulk, by far, of both the diversity and total landings of marine organisms encoun- Btered in fisheries of the Western Central Atlantic.They are found in all macrofaunal marine and estuarine habitats and exhibit a lavish array of adaptations to these environments. This extreme diversity of form and taxa presents an exceptional challenge for identification. There are 30 orders and 269 families of bony fishes presented in this guide, representing all families known from the area. Each order and family presents a unique suite of taxonomic problems and relevant characters. The purpose of this preliminary section on technical terms and guide to orders and families is to serve as an introduction and initial identification guide to this taxonomic diversity. It should also serve as a general reference for those features most commonly used in identification of bony fishes throughout the remaining volumes. However, I cannot begin to introduce the many facets of fish biology relevant to understanding the diversity of fishes in a few pages. For this, the reader is directed to one of the several general texts on fish biology such as the ones by Bond (1996), Moyle and Cech (1996), and Helfman et al.(1997) listed below. A general introduction to the fisheries of bony fishes in this region is given in the introduction to these volumes. Taxonomic details relevant to a specific family are explained under each of the appropriate family sections. The classification of bony fishes continues to transform as our knowledge of their evolutionary relationships improves.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Passage and Injury Risk at a Surface Bypass of a Small-Scale Hydropower Plant
    sustainability Article Fish Passage and Injury Risk at a Surface Bypass of a Small-Scale Hydropower Plant Josef Knott, Melanie Mueller, Joachim Pander and Juergen Geist * Aquatic Systems Biology Unit, Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management, Technical University of Munich, Mühlenweg 22, 85354 Freising, Germany; [email protected] (J.K.); [email protected] (M.M.); [email protected] (J.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-816-171-3767 Received: 14 October 2019; Accepted: 29 October 2019; Published: 30 October 2019 Abstract: In contrast to the efforts made to develop functioning fishways for upstream migrants, the need for effective downstream migration facilities has long been underestimated. The challenge of developing well-performing bypasses for downstream migrants involves attracting the fish to the entrance and transporting them quickly and unharmed into the tailrace. In this study, the acceptance of different opening sizes of a surface bypass as well as the injuries which fish experience during the passage were examined. Overall bypass acceptance was low compared to the turbine passage. There was no significant difference in the number of downstream moving fish between the small and the large bypass openings. Across all fish species, no immediate mortality was detected. Severe injuries such as amputations or bruises were only rarely detected and at low intensity. Scale losses, tears and hemorrhages in the fins and dermal lesions at the body were the most common injuries, and significant species-specific differences were detected. To increase bypass efficiency, it would likely be useful to offer an alternative bottom bypass in addition to the existing surface bypass.
    [Show full text]
  • The Journal of the Catfish Study Group (UK)
    The Journal of the Catfish Study Group (UK) Planet's srnallest ~· tiSh · Js found! ,,. \nto wa\\ets · n\tor f\sh 5 "'n students turn la Microg/anis v. anegatus E· Jgenmann & H enn Volume 7 Issue Number 1 March 2006 CONTENTS 1 Committee 2 From The Chair 3 Louis Agassiz (1807- 1873) by A w Taylor. 4 Planet's smallest fish is found! 5 Breeding Scleromystax prionotus by A w Taylor 6 Meet Stuart Brown the Membership Secretary 7 Students turn janitor fish skin into wallets 7 Meet the Member 9 'What's New' March 2006 by Mark Waiters 1 0 Microglanis variegatus by Steven Grant 13 lt Seemed Mostly Normal To Me by Lee Finley 17 Map of new meeting venue - Darwen The Committee and I apologise for the late delivery of this journal but due to the lack of articles, there would have only been the advertisements to send to you. Without your information, photos or articles, there is no Cat Chat. Thank you to those of you who did contribute. Articles for publication in Cat Chat should be sent to: Bill Hurst 18 Three Pools Crossens South port PR98RA England Or bye-mail to: [email protected] with the subject Cat Chat so that I don't treat it as spam mail and delete it without opening it. car cttar March 2006 Vol 7 No 1 HONORARY COMMITTEE FOR THE CAJf,IJSIJ SlffiJIIF CltOfiJ, ffiJ•I 2005 PRESIDENT FUNCTIONS MANAGER Trevor (JT) Morris Trevor Morris trevorjtcat@aol. eo m VICE PRESIDENT Or Peter Burgess SOCIAL SECRETARY [email protected] Terry Ward [email protected] CHAIRMAN lan Fuller WEB SITE MANAGER [email protected] [email protected] VICE CHAIRMAN/TREASURER COMMITIEE MEMBER Danny Blundell Peter Liptrot [email protected] [email protected] SECRETARY SOUTHERN REP Adrian Taylor Steve Pritchard [email protected] S.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Fish Fish Fall Into Two Main Groups: Fish with Bony Internal Skeletons and Fish with Cartilaginous Internal Skeletons
    Marine fish Fish fall into two main groups: fish with bony internal skeletons and fish with cartilaginous internal skeletons. Fish anatomy and physiology generally includes a two-chambered heart, eyes adapted to seeing underwater, and a skin protected by scales and mucous. They typically breathe by extracting oxygen from water through gills. Fish use fins to propel and stabilise themselves in the water. Over 33,000 species of fish have been described as of 2017,[1] of which about 20,000 are marine fish.[2] Jawless fish Hagfish form a class of about 20 species of eel-shaped, slime-producing marine fish. They are the only known living animals that have a skull but no vertebral column. Lampreys form a superclass containing 38 known extant species of Jawless fish.[3] The adult lamprey is characterized by a toothed, funnel-like sucking mouth. Although they are well known for boring into the flesh of other fish to suck their blood,[4] only 18 species of lampreys are actually parasitic.[5] Together hagfish and lampreys are the sister group to vertebrates. Living hagfish remain similar to hagfish from around 300 million years ago.[6] The lampreys are a very ancient lineage of vertebrates, though their exact relationship to hagfishes and jawed vertebrates is still a matter of dispute.[7] Molecular analysis since 1992 has suggested that hagfish are most closely related to lampreys,[8] and so also are vertebrates in a monophyletic sense. Others consider them a sister group of vertebrates in the common taxon of craniata.[9] • Hagfish are the only known living animals with a skull but no vertebral column.
    [Show full text]
  • Order GASTEROSTEIFORMES PEGASIDAE Eurypegasus Draconis
    click for previous page 2262 Bony Fishes Order GASTEROSTEIFORMES PEGASIDAE Seamoths (seadragons) by T.W. Pietsch and W.A. Palsson iagnostic characters: Small fishes (to 18 cm total length); body depressed, completely encased in Dfused dermal plates; tail encircled by 8 to 14 laterally articulating, or fused, bony rings. Nasal bones elongate, fused, forming a rostrum; mouth inferior. Gill opening restricted to a small hole on dorsolat- eral surface behind head. Spinous dorsal fin absent; soft dorsal and anal fins each with 5 rays, placed posteriorly on body. Caudal fin with 8 unbranched rays. Pectoral fins large, wing-like, inserted horizon- tally, composed of 9 to 19 unbranched, soft or spinous-soft rays; pectoral-fin rays interconnected by broad, transparent membranes. Pelvic fins thoracic, tentacle-like,withI spine and 2 or 3 unbranched soft rays. Colour: in life highly variable, apparently capable of rapid colour change to match substrata; head and body light to dark brown, olive-brown, reddish brown, or almost black, with dorsal and lateral surfaces usually darker than ventral surface; dorsal and lateral body surface often with fine, dark brown reticulations or mottled lines, sometimes with irregular white or yellow blotches; tail rings often encircled with dark brown bands; pectoral fins with broad white outer margin and small brown spots forming irregular, longitudinal bands; unpaired fins with small brown spots in irregular rows. dorsal view lateral view Habitat, biology, and fisheries: Benthic, found on sand, gravel, shell-rubble, or muddy bottoms. Collected incidentally by seine, trawl, dredge, or shrimp nets; postlarvae have been taken at surface lights at night.
    [Show full text]
  • Hemibarbus Labeo) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    Barbel Steed (Hemibarbus labeo) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, August 2012 Revised, February 2017 Web Version, 1/14/2018 Photo: Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences. Licensed under CC BY-NC 3.0. Available: http://fishbase.org/photos/PicturesSummary.php?StartRow=0&ID=17301&what=species&TotRe c=9. (February 2017). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2016): “Asia: throughout the Amur basin [Berg 1964]; eastern Asia from the Amur basin to northern Vietnam, Japan and islands of Hainan and Taiwan [Reshetnikov et al. 1997].” Status in the United States This species has not been reported in the United States. 1 Means of Introductions in the United States This species has not been reported in the United States. Remarks From CABI (2017): “Other Scientific Names Acanthogobio oxyrhynchus Nikolskii, 1903 Barbus labeo Pallas, 1776 Barbus schlegelii Günther, 1868 Cyprinus labeo Pallas, 1776 Gobio barbus Temminck & Schlegel, 1846 Gobiobarbus labeo Pallas, 1776 Hemibarbus barbus Temminck & Schlegel, 1846 Hemibarbus longianalis Kimura, 1934 Pseudogobio chaoi Evermann & Shaw, 1927” 2 Biology and Ecology Taxonomic Hierarchy and Taxonomic Standing From ITIS (2017): “Kingdom Animalia Subkingdom Bilateria Infrakingdom Deuterostomia Phylum Chordata Subphylum Vertebrata Infraphylum Gnathostomata Superclass Osteichthyes Class Actinopterygii Subclass Neopterygii Infraclass Teleostei Superorder Ostariophysi Order Cypriniformes Superfamily Cyprinoidea Family Cyprinidae Genus Hemibarbus Bleeker, 1860 Species Hemibarbus labeo (Pallas, 1776)” “Taxonomic Status: valid” 2 Size, Weight, and Age Range From Froese and Pauly (2016): “Max length : 62.0 cm TL male/unsexed; [Novikov et al. 2002]; common length : 33.0 cm TL male/unsexed; [Berg 1964]; common length :40.6 cm TL (female); max.
    [Show full text]
  • Transposable Elements and Teleost Migratory Behaviour
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Transposable Elements and Teleost Migratory Behaviour Elisa Carotti 1,†, Federica Carducci 1,†, Adriana Canapa 1, Marco Barucca 1,* , Samuele Greco 2 , Marco Gerdol 2 and Maria Assunta Biscotti 1 1 Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, 60131 Ancona, Italy; [email protected] (E.C.); [email protected] (F.C.); [email protected] (A.C.); [email protected] (M.A.B.) 2 Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, Via L. Giorgieri, 5-34127 Trieste, Italy; [email protected] (S.G.); [email protected] (M.G.) * Correspondence: [email protected] † Equal contribution. Abstract: Transposable elements (TEs) represent a considerable fraction of eukaryotic genomes, thereby contributing to genome size, chromosomal rearrangements, and to the generation of new coding genes or regulatory elements. An increasing number of works have reported a link between the genomic abundance of TEs and the adaptation to specific environmental conditions. Diadromy represents a fascinating feature of fish, protagonists of migratory routes between marine and fresh- water for reproduction. In this work, we investigated the genomes of 24 fish species, including 15 teleosts with a migratory behaviour. The expected higher relative abundance of DNA transposons in ray-finned fish compared with the other fish groups was not confirmed by the analysis of the dataset considered. The relative contribution of different TE types in migratory ray-finned species did not show clear differences between oceanodromous and potamodromous fish. On the contrary, a remarkable relationship between migratory behaviour and the quantitative difference reported for short interspersed nuclear (retro)elements (SINEs) emerged from the comparison between anadro- mous and catadromous species, independently from their phylogenetic position.
    [Show full text]
  • ED198014.Pdf
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 198 D14 SE 034 401 AUTHOR Mauldin, Lundie: Frankenberg, Dirk TITLE North Carolina Marine Education Manual: Appendices. INSTITUTION North Carolina state Unii., Raleigh. Sea Grant Coll. SPONS AGENCY National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration FDOC), Rockville, Md. National Sea Grant Program.: North Carolina State Dept. of Administration, Raleigh. "'PORT NO UrC-SG-7B-14-D PUB DATE Aug 78 CANT NOAA-04-5158-44054 NOTE 42p.: For related docuoents, see SE 034 397-400. AVAILABLE FROM Ur:: Sea Grant, 105 1911 Building, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27647 4$1.00). EDES PRICE MF01/PC62 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Audiovisual Aids: Elementary Secondary Education: Environmental Education: *Field Trips: *Marine Biology: *Oceanography: *Reference Materials; *Science Education: Science Materials; Social Studies APSTRACT Presented are appendices to a series of four manuals of marine education activiLies produced by NorthCarolina teachers and college faculty under a Sea Grant projectentitled "Man and the Seacoast. Information on relevant films,periodicals, federal and state resources, games, and marine careers isprovided. Also included are directions for keeping amaT'ire aquarium, and "Shifting Sands" which is a guide to field trips along the North Carolinacoast. (WT3) ************************************************************4:*****.***** * Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made * * from the original document. * *********************************************************************** U.S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. EDUCATION & WELFARE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO- C.LICED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGIN- ATING IT POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRE SENT OFFICIAL NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY Appendices North Carolina Marine Education Manual 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy and Go Fish! Background
    Anatomy and Go Fish! Background Introduction It is important to properly identify fi sh for many reasons: to follow the rules and regulations, for protection against sharp teeth or protruding spines, for the safety of the fi sh, and for consumption or eating purposes. When identifying fi sh, scientists and anglers use specifi c vocabulary to describe external or outside body parts. These body parts are common to most fi sh. The difference in the body parts is what helps distinguish one fi sh from another, while their similarities are used to classify them into groups. There are approximately 29,000 fi sh species in the world. In order to identify each type of fi sh, scientists have grouped them according to their outside body parts, specifi cally the number and location of fi ns, and body shape. Classifi cation Using a system of classifi cation, scientists arrange all organisms into groups based on their similarities. The fi rst system of classifi cation was proposed in 1753 by Carolus Linnaeus. Linnaeus believed that each organism should have a binomial name, genus and species, with species being the smallest organization unit of life. Using Linnaeus’ system as a guide, scientists created a hierarchical system known as taxonomic classifi cation, in which organisms are classifi ed into groups based on their similarities. This hierarchical system moves from largest and most general to smallest and most specifi c: kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, and species. {See Figure 1. Taxonomic Classifi cation Pyramid}. For example, fi sh belong to the kingdom Animalia, the phylum Chordata, and from there are grouped more specifi cally into several classes, orders, families, and thousands of genus and species.
    [Show full text]
  • Barbel Cholera, a Rare but Still Possible Food-Borne Poisoning. Case Report
    Acta Biomed 2018; Vol. 89, N. 4: 590-592 DOI: 10.23750/abm.v89i4.7606 © Mattioli 1885 Emergence Medicine - Up date Barbel cholera, a rare but still possible food-borne poisoning. Case report and narrative review Ivan Comelli1, Matteo Riccò2, Gianfranco Cervellin1 1 Emergency Department, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy; 2 Working Environment Prevention and Safety Service. Local Health Agency, Reggio nell’Emilia, Italy Summary. The gastro enteric toxic effects of the barbel eggs have been described up to two centuries ago, but deliberate or serendipitous ingestion of this fish product still occur, often eliciting a gastrointestinal syn- drome usually known as barbel cholera. Barbel cholera is a self-limited gastrointestinal diarrheic syndrome that develops 2 to 4 hours after ingestion of the eggs, lasting up to 12-36 hours, nearly always complicated by vomiting and severe abdominal pain. The disease is usually self-limited, and the prognosis is thus benign even without hospitalization and medical treatment. Rarely, however, barbel cholera may be complicated by mas- sive diarrhea, and the patients can develop bradycardia, oligo-anuria, and eventually hypovolemic shock. In this article we describe a rare case of barbel cholera, highlighting both the diagnostic difficulties in identifying it, and the importance of obtain an accurate history, focused on recently ingested food, thus addressing the clinical management on supportive treatment, expecting symptoms’ improvement usually within 36 hours. (www.actabiomedica.it) Key words: barbel cholera, barbus fish, barbel eggs, food borne poisoning, gastroenteritis, Emergency Depart- ment Introduction deliberate or serendipitous ingestion of barbel eggs still occur, often eliciting a gastrointestinal syndrome usu- The genus Barbus includes several species of fresh- ally known as barbel cholera (1-4).
    [Show full text]
  • Explore a Fish Lesson Plan
    Grade Level 4 - 12 EXPLORE A FISH Duration FISH DISSECTION 1 - 1 ½ hours Subject/Subject Area Focus Overview Science, language arts; Students will examine the external and internal anatomy of various fish Analysis, application, species. They will note similarities and differences. Students will then communication, use their observations to make inferences about the relationships among comparing similarities and them. differences, description, discussion, drawing, small Background information group work, using time This activity gives students first-hand experience exploring the and space, writing. adaptations which allow fish to function in their environment. Students look at both form and function of different systems to help understand Materials how specific adaptations assist organisms in adapting to their For each pair (or group) of environment. How do fish move through the water and keep their vertical students: position within the water? Students can make comparisons between their • Whole body fresh fish own anatomy and the anatomy of a fish. • Dissecting trays or thick pads of newspaper It is important for students to understand the purpose of this activity • Scissors or Scalpel is to study the internal and external anatomy of a fish. It requires (Most cuts can be concentration, listening skills and being able to follow directions. All made with a pair of students should be given the option of not participating in the activity classroom scissors) and be allowed an alternate activity. You may want to do a practice run on • Probe (A large partially your own. straightened paper clip works well) You can either do this activity as a teacher-led class discussion or break • Forceps (A nice tool but the students into cooperative learning groups and give each group: a fish, not necessary) “Explore a Fish” worksheet, dissection and anatomy sheet, newspaper • Paper towels and and something to cut the fish with.
    [Show full text]
  • Hara Jerdoni by Adrian Taylor
    The Journal of the Catfish Study Group (UK) In this issue ing Moth Cats of the genera Hara and Erethistes By Steven Grant Breeding Hara jerdoni By Adrian Taylor Spawning Misadventures By L Quilty '• Corydoras zygatus By Yann Fulliquet On the validity and identity of some species of Synodontis By Steven Grant Volume 4 Issue Number 2 June 2003 CONTENTS 1 Committee 2 From the Chair 3 The identity of Moth Cats of the genera Hara Blyth, 1860 and Erethistes Muller & Troschel, 1849 by Steven Grant 9 My observations of breeding the Moth Cat Hara jerdoni by Adrian Taylor 11 Spawning Misadventures - A lesson learned by L Quilty 12 Corydoras zygatus by Yann Fulliquet 15 On the validity and identity of some species of Synodontis Cuvier, 1817 (Siluriformes: Mochokidae) by Steven Grant Articles and pictures can be sent by e-mail direct to the editor ; <bill @catfish.co.uk> or by post to Bill Hurst 18 Three Pools Crossens SOUTH PORT PR9 BRA (England) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Front Cover: Original Design by Kathy Jinkins. June 2003 Vol4 No 2 HONORARY COMMITTEE FOR THE CA1fF,Sft SlffiOF C&Ofl. (ffllfl 2003 PRESIDENT AUCTION ORGANISERS Trevor (JT) Morris Roy & Dave Barton VICE PRESIDENT FUNCTIONS MANAGER Or Peter Burgess Trevor Morris [email protected] SOCIAL SECRETARY CHAIRMAN Terry Ward lan Fuller ian @corycats.com WEB SITE MANAGERS Allan James [email protected] VICE CHAIRMAN Danny Blundell COMMITTEE MEMBERS DANNY.BLU NO ELL @care4free.net Peter Liptrot [email protected] SECRETARY Temporarily lan Fuller SOUTHERN REP Steve Pritchard TREASURER S. Pritchard@ btinternet.com Temporarily: Danny Blundell DANNY.
    [Show full text]