DOCSLIB.ORG

A Study of College Major Choice and Major Switching Behavior

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Study of College Major Choice and Major Switching Behavior Dissertation Choose Wisely A Study of College Major Choice and Major Switching Behavior Cameron Wright This document was submitted as a dissertation in May 2018 in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the doctoral degree in public policy analysis at the Pardee RAND Graduate School. The faculty committee that supervised and approved the dissertation consisted of Charles A. Goldman (Chair), Trey Miller, and Dermot Forde. PARDEE RAND GRADUATE SCHOOL For more information on this publication, visit http://www.rand.org/pubs/rgs_dissertations/RGSD414.html Published 2018 by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. R® is a registered trademark Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.html. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Table of Contents Acknowledgments........................................................................................................................... v Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... vi Chapter One: Introduction & Research Design .............................................................................. 1 Research Questions .................................................................................................................................. 3 Research Design ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Organization of the Dissertation ............................................................................................................... 7 Chapter Two: Literature Review and Conceptual Models ............................................................. 9 Overview .................................................................................................................................................. 9 How do Students Choose their Major? ..................................................................................................... 9 What Majors do Students Choose and what is the Impact of those Choices? ........................................ 12 Why do Students Switch Majors? .......................................................................................................... 13 How Much Major Switching Occurs and What is the Effect? ............................................................... 15 Are their Differences in Major Choice Behavior between Demographic Groups? ................................ 17 Conceptual Models ................................................................................................................................. 21 Summary ................................................................................................................................................ 24 Chapter Three: Analysis of Major Selection Behavior Using Nationally Representative Data ... 26 Background............................................................................................................................................. 26 Data and Methods ................................................................................................................................... 26 Results .................................................................................................................................................... 27 Limitations .............................................................................................................................................. 33 Discussion .............................................................................................................................................. 34 Chapter Four: A Qualitative Exploration of Student Major Choice ............................................. 36 Overview ................................................................................................................................................ 36 Top Major Fields of Study Under Consideration ................................................................................... 39 Reasons for Being Undecided ................................................................................................................ 43 Initiation of Major Consideration ........................................................................................................... 46 Important Factors in Major Choice ........................................................................................................ 48 Sources of Information ........................................................................................................................... 57 External Influences on Major Decision Making Process ....................................................................... 64 Career and Life Planning Course ............................................................................................................ 71 Potential Career Outcomes and Major Choice ....................................................................................... 73 Knowledge of Pay Levels Associated with Different Majors ................................................................ 74 Should All Students be Undecided? ....................................................................................................... 75 Initial Major Consideration Process ....................................................................................................... 77 Major Switch Consideration Process ...................................................................................................... 82 Biggest Challenges ................................................................................................................................. 86 Additional Information or Resources ..................................................................................................... 89 iii Advice for Incoming Major Deciding Freshmen ................................................................................... 91 Conclusion .............................................................................................................................................. 92 Chapter Five: Academic Advisor Perspectives on Major Choice ................................................ 95 Overview ................................................................................................................................................ 95 Responsibilities and Student Load ......................................................................................................... 96 Assistance with Initial Major Selection .................................................................................................. 96 Information Used for Advisement .......................................................................................................... 98 What Factors Should Students Use to Weigh Different Majors ............................................................. 98 Biggest Challenges for Initial Major Decision Advisement ................................................................. 102 Primary Factors Driving Major Switches ............................................................................................. 105 Difference in Advisement between Initial Major Deciders and Major Switchers ................................ 107 Effects of Switching on Time to Degree and Graduation ..................................................................... 108 Serial Major Switchers ......................................................................................................................... 110 Difficulty of Major Switching .............................................................................................................. 110 Should All Students be Undecided? ..................................................................................................... 111 Additional Resources ............................................................................................................................ 112 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................ 113 Chapter Six: University-specific Analysis of Major Selection Behavior ................................... 115 Data and Methods ................................................................................................................................. 115 Descriptive Statistics ...........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Excesss Karaoke Master by Artist
    XS Master by ARTIST Artist Song Title Artist Song Title (hed) Planet Earth Bartender TOOTIMETOOTIMETOOTIM ? & The Mysterians 96 Tears E 10 Years Beautiful UGH! Wasteland 1999 Man United Squad Lift It High (All About 10,000 Maniacs Candy Everybody Wants Belief) More Than This 2 Chainz Bigger Than You (feat. Drake & Quavo) [clean] Trouble Me I'm Different 100 Proof Aged In Soul Somebody's Been Sleeping I'm Different (explicit) 10cc Donna 2 Chainz & Chris Brown Countdown Dreadlock Holiday 2 Chainz & Kendrick Fuckin' Problems I'm Mandy Fly Me Lamar I'm Not In Love 2 Chainz & Pharrell Feds Watching (explicit) Rubber Bullets 2 Chainz feat Drake No Lie (explicit) Things We Do For Love, 2 Chainz feat Kanye West Birthday Song (explicit) The 2 Evisa Oh La La La Wall Street Shuffle 2 Live Crew Do Wah Diddy Diddy 112 Dance With Me Me So Horny It's Over Now We Want Some Pussy Peaches & Cream 2 Pac California Love U Already Know Changes 112 feat Mase Puff Daddy Only You & Notorious B.I.G. Dear Mama 12 Gauge Dunkie Butt I Get Around 12 Stones We Are One Thugz Mansion 1910 Fruitgum Co. Simon Says Until The End Of Time 1975, The Chocolate 2 Pistols & Ray J You Know Me City, The 2 Pistols & T-Pain & Tay She Got It Dizm Girls (clean) 2 Unlimited No Limits If You're Too Shy (Let Me Know) 20 Fingers Short Dick Man If You're Too Shy (Let Me 21 Savage & Offset &Metro Ghostface Killers Know) Boomin & Travis Scott It's Not Living (If It's Not 21st Century Girls 21st Century Girls With You 2am Club Too Fucked Up To Call It's Not Living (If It's Not 2AM Club Not
    [Show full text]
  • Songs by Artist
    Sunfly (All) Songs by Artist Karaoke Shack Song Books Title DiscID Title DiscID (Comic Relief) Vanessa Jenkins & Bryn West & Sir Tom Jones & 3OH!3 Robin Gibb Don't Trust Me SFKK033-10 (Barry) Islands In The Stream SF278-16 3OH!3 & Katy Perry £1 Fish Man Starstrukk SF286-11 One Pound Fish SF12476 Starstrukk SFKK038-10 10cc 3OH!3 & Kesha Dreadlock Holiday SF023-12 My First Kiss SFKK046-03 Dreadlock Holiday SFHT004-12 3SL I'm Mandy SF079-03 Take It Easy SF191-09 I'm Not In Love SF001-09 3T I'm Not In Love SFD701-6-05 Anything FLY032-07 Rubber Bullets SF071-01 Anything SF049-02 Things We Do For Love, The SFMW832-11 3T & Michael Jackson Wall Street Shuffle SFMW814-01 Why SF080-11 1910 Fruitgum Company 3T (Wvocal) Simon Says SF028-10 Anything FLY032-15 Simon Says SFG047-10 4 Non Blondes 1927 What's Up SF005-08 Compulsory Hero SFDU03-03 What's Up SFD901-3-14 Compulsory Hero SFHH02-05-10 What's Up SFHH02-09-15 If I Could SFDU09-11 What's Up SFHT006-04 That's When I Think Of You SFID009-04 411, The 1975, The Dumb SF221-12 Chocolate SF326-13 On My Knees SF219-04 City, The SF329-16 Teardrops SF225-06 Love Me SF358-13 5 Seconds Of Summer Robbers SF341-12 Amnesia SF342-12 Somebody Else SF367-13 Don't Stop SF340-17 Sound, The SF361-08 Girls Talk Boys SF366-16 TOOTIMETOOTIMETOOTIME SF390-09 Good Girls SF345-07 UGH SF360-09 She Looks So Perfect SF338-05 2 Eivissa She's Kinda Hot SF355-04 Oh La La La SF114-10 Youngblood SF388-08 2 Unlimited 50 Cent No Limit FLY027-05 Candy Shop SF230-10 No Limit SF006-05 Candy Shop SFKK002-09 No Limit SFD901-3-11 In Da
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Loans on Time to Doctorate Degree: Differences by Race/Ethnicity, Field of Study, and Institutional Characteristics
    Dongbin Kim Cindy Otts The Effect of Loans on Time to Doctorate Degree: Differences by Race/Ethnicity, Field of Study, and Institutional Characteristics Introduction Graduate schools prepare students not only for fu- ture careers in academia, but also for leadership positions in govern- ment, business, non-profit organizations, and other industries. Given the likelihood of doctoral degree recipients being active in research or lead- ership positions, they may have considerable opportunity to influence public policy. In a global, knowledge-driven economy, the need for a highly educated workforce is vital to maintaining the nation’s status and economy. Doctoral-granting institutions, therefore, play an important role in educating academicians and professionals alike who can take the lead in this highly interdependent world. Unfortunately, the nation’s graduate schools fail to fully educate many students who enter doctoral programs because the programs are plagued by high attrition rates. This material is based upon work supported by the Association for Institutional Re- search, the National Center for Education Statistics, the National Science Foundation, and the National Postsecondary Education Cooperative under Association for Institu- tional Research Grant Number 223. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recom- mendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Association for Institutional Research, the National Center for Education Statistics, the National Science Foundation, or the National Postsecondary Education Cooperative. Authors thank the anonymous reviewers for comments and encouragements on ear- lier drafts. Dongbin Kim is an assistant professor in the department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies at the University of Kansas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Digital Music Distribution" (2012)
    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC Research Papers Graduate School Spring 4-5-2012 The ffecE ts of Digital Music Distribution Rama A. Dechsakda [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/gs_rp The er search paper was a study of how digital music distribution has affected the music industry by researching different views and aspects. I believe this topic was vital to research because it give us insight on were the music industry is headed in the future. Two main research questions proposed were; “How is digital music distribution affecting the music industry?” and “In what way does the piracy industry affect the digital music industry?” The methodology used for this research was performing case studies, researching prospective and retrospective data, and analyzing sales figures and graphs. Case studies were performed on one independent artist and two major artists whom changed the digital music industry in different ways. Another pair of case studies were performed on an independent label and a major label on how changes of the digital music industry effected their business model and how piracy effected those new business models as well. I analyzed sales figures and graphs of digital music sales and physical sales to show the differences in the formats. I researched prospective data on how consumers adjusted to the digital music advancements and how piracy industry has affected them. Last I concluded all the data found during this research to show that digital music distribution is growing and could possibly be the dominant format for obtaining music, and the battle with piracy will be an ongoing process that will be hard to end anytime soon.
    [Show full text]
  • Transfer Students and General Education Requirements January 30, 2018
    Transfer Students and General Education Requirements January 30, 2018 Transfer Action Status 1. FYE and HPLW 105 are satisfied. With Associates 2. All breadth areas of GE and corresponding overlays (Artistic Expression, Communication, and from State Global Diversity and Citizenship) are marked as satisfied. System 3. Any accepted transfer courses outside of the GE breadth area whose ESU course fulfills an University overlays (i.e. WII, WIII, or I) will need to be reviewed by the Transfer Office and the relevant Academic Dean/Dept Chair before being used to fulfil the overlay (See example A). 1. Full “junior standing” 2 2. FYE and HPLW 105 are satisfied. With Associates 3. ESU will “fully accept general education course work when comparable (though perhaps not (Part of P2P) identical” to GE at ESU. There is “not a course to course equivalency requirement.” 1 Review conducted by the Transfer Office and relevant Academic Dean/Dept. Chair. (See examples B & C) With Associates 1. FYE satisfied and HPLW 105 satisfied. (Not part of 2. Course to course credit review by Transfer Office and relevant Academic Dean/Dept. Chair to P2P) fulfil breadth and overlay areas. 1. If 24 credits or more FYE satisfied; 60 credits or more HPLW 105 satisfied. 2. If the GE program at the prior state system university is complete, the GE program at ESU will be marked as complete.2 Without Degree 3. If the GE program at the prior system system university is not complete, then Course to course from a State credit based on review by the Transfer Office and relevant Academic Dean/Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Academic Affairs Guidelines
    ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES Section 2: Academic Programs and Curriculum: Guidelines and Procedures Title: Curriculum and Program Definitions Number (Current Format) Number (Prior Format) Date Last Revised 2.1 II.F.1 10/2018 Reference: BOR Policy 2:25 – Articulation of General Education Courses: South Dakota Technical Institutes without a Memorandum of Agreement with the Board of Regents BOR Policy 2:29 – Definition of Credits and Related Institutional Requirements BOR Policy 2:23 – Program and Curriculum Approval BOR Policy 2:7 – Baccalaureate General Education Curriculum BOR Policy 2:26 – Associate Degree General Education Curriculum Related Form(s): 1. Undergraduate Degree Programs 1.1. Bachelor’s Degree Universities award a bachelor’s degree to a student for satisfactory completion of a prescribed course of study. Bachelor’s degree programs shall require one hundred twenty (120) credit hours. The Board of Regents may grant exceptions those cases in which a program must comply with specific standards established by external accreditation, licensure or regulatory bodies or for other compelling reasons approved by the executive director in consultation with the Board of Regents’ president (Board Policy 2:29). A diploma and transcript signify the measure of achievement and verify the degree. The bachelor’s degree enables a student to acquire a certain amount of general learning and become proficient in a particular field of study or a profession. The curricular structure of a bachelor’s degree program includes a system general education core curriculum (thirty [30] credit ours per Board Policy 2:7), support courses, major courses, and electives. 1.2. Associate Degrees 1.2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Corporate Announcements
    Facility Announcement Date Company Headline Activity Type Job Impact Square Feet Description News source Type 6/23/2021 Quiet 3PF Massachusetts logistics company opens 1st TX Industrial New Facility / 400 550,000 Quiet 3PF, leading logistics provider for premium lifestyle brands, has occupied over 550,000-sf in northwest Dallas for new Dallas Business Journal fulfillment center in Dallas Operation fulfillment center. Plans to bring 400 new jobs. 6/17/2021 Youtech & Associates Digital marketing agency opens DFW office Office New Facility / 50 1,000 Youtech, digital marketing agency based in Chicago, opens Plano office with plans to hire 50 workers. The Business Journals / NTX INNO Inc. with plans to hire around 50 workers Operation 6/16/2021 Theragun, Inc Theragun Maker Picks Dallas For Second U.S. Office New Facility / 50 Therabody, Los Angeles tech-wellness company and creator of the Theragun, will set up its 2nd U.S. HQ in Dallas at 2200 D Magazine Headquarters Operation Main in the East Quarter of downtown Dallas. It expects to bring 50 jobs. 6/16/2021 CarParts.com CarParts.com creates 125 jobs with 156,000-sf Industrial Expansion / 125 156,000 CarParts.com, California-based automobile parts company, is expanding its Grand Prairie distribution center by adding 125 Dallas Morning News expansion in Grand Prairie Consolidation jobs and 156,000-sf to its existing building. 6/10/2021 Siteone Landscape Public wholesaler expands into Texas with Industrial New Facility / 337,913 Georgia-based SiteOne Landscape Supply has opened its largest distribution center in South Dallas County. The wholesaler Dallas Business Journal Supply, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • My Bloody Valentine's Loveless David R
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2006 My Bloody Valentine's Loveless David R. Fisher Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MUSIC MY BLOODY VALENTINE’S LOVELESS By David R. Fisher A thesis submitted to the College of Music In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Music Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2006 The members of the Committee approve the thesis of David Fisher on March 29, 2006. ______________________________ Charles E. Brewer Professor Directing Thesis ______________________________ Frank Gunderson Committee Member ______________________________ Evan Jones Outside Committee M ember The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables......................................................................................................................iv Abstract................................................................................................................................v 1. THE ORIGINS OF THE SHOEGAZER.........................................................................1 2. A BIOGRAPHICAL ACCOUNT OF MY BLOODY VALENTINE.………..………17 3. AN ANALYSIS OF MY BLOODY VALENTINE’S LOVELESS...............................28 4. LOVELESS AND ITS LEGACY...................................................................................50 BIBLIOGRAPHY..............................................................................................................63
    [Show full text]
  • I'm Gonna Keep Growin'
    always bugged off of that like he always [imi­ tated] two people. I liked the way he freaked that. So on "Gimme The Loot" I really wanted to make people think that it was a different person [rhyming with me]. I just wanted to make a hot joint that sounded like two nig­ gas-a big nigga and a Iii ' nigga. And I know it worked because niggas asked me like, "Yo , who did you do 'Gimme The Loot' wit'?" So I be like, "Yeah, well, my job is done." I just got it from Slick though. And Redman did it too, but he didn't change his voice. What is the illest line that you ever heard? Damn ... I heard some crazy shit, dog. I would have to pick somethin' from my shit, though. 'Cause I know I done said some of the most illest rhymes, you know what I'm sayin'? But mad niggas said different shit, though. I like that shit [Keith] Murray said [on "Sychosymatic"]: "Yo E, this might be my last album son/'Cause niggas tryin' to play us like crumbs/Nobodys/ I'm a fuck around and murder everybody." I love that line. There's shit that G Rap done said. And Meth [on "Protect Ya Neck"]: "The smoke from the lyrical blunt make me ugh." Shit like that. I look for shit like that in rhymes. Niggas can just come up with that one Iii' piece. Like XXL: You've got the number-one spot on me chang in' the song, we just edited it.
    [Show full text]
  • By Student Congresswoman by Sonja Martin Are Not Known
    Volume 44 Number 10 December 3,1992 STOCKTON STATE COLLEGE POMONA, NEW J ERSE Y 08240 Officer "assaulted" by student Congresswoman by Sonja Martin are not known. Skipper, Monfiston's roommate. In the morning of December 2, Monfiston has been charged with Skipper was asleep and awoke to 1992, an altercation occurred in Hous- aggravated assault of a police officer, find Monfiston against the wall and ing I resulting in an arrest of a student resisting arrest, and disorderly person Lentz "in his face." Monfiston was due to an alleged assault of Sergeant according to campus police. He is held apparently saying that all he was doing and harmony William Lentz of Stockton Campus in the Atlantic County Corrections was walking up to his apartment. Police. Officers were responding to a Skipper tried to break up the physi- E.C. O'Hanlon report of gunshots fired and a female cal confrontation between Lentz and "We must recognize we are fellow travelers on this screaming in H-court at approximately Monfiston but Officer Forte, the other Earth Ship, the small planet called Earth. All our actions 4:00AM. Officers responded and ques- officer present, held him back. Ac- should reflect and acknowledge this," commented Shirley tioned Dominique Monfiston as to if cording to Skipper, Lentz pushed Chisholm recently. he had any information on what oc- Monfiston into the living room lamp The Stockton International Student Organization curred. and Monfiston pushed him back. Skip- brought Ms. Chisholm, former United States Congress- "For some reason, the suspect be- per again tried to break this up.
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Educational Terms 2Nd Edition Now with Farsi
    INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION RESEARCH FOUNDATION ® Index of Educational Terms 2nd Edition now with Farsi 1969-2019 Celebrating 50 years of service Index of Educational Terms We are pleased to present this 2nd edition of the Index of Educational Terms, as part of IERF’s 50th anniversary celebration. This handy resource can trace its beginnings to the 1979 publication of The Glossary of Foreign Educational Terms. Developed by Theodore Sharp, IERF’s co-founder, The Glossary focused on a selection of languages from Europe and Latin America. The Index of Educational Terms, compiled by IERF evaluators, provides glossaries from 11 major languages around the world, including Arabic, Chinese and Russian. This new edition, which now also includes Farsi, is intended as a handy tool for admissions officers, credentials analysts and registrars, the Index of Educational Terms focuses on the most commonly used terms found on international academic records. We are grateful for the enthusiastic feedback we have received over the years, since its first release in 2012. I would like to give special thanks to the following individuals for their hard work and for making this possible: Editors: Emily Tse Alice Tang Contributors: Liana Amelova Andrej Molchan Andrea Ben Zion Maryam Rawson Daniel Borhanian Irene Romo Joshua Everett Amy Santiago Matthew Fisher Traci Wells Victoria Haydenko Alvin Yin I-Hsing Lin Nina Zhao Finally, I would also like to express my appreciation to our colleagues, Ujjaini Sahasrabudhe and Herman de Leeuw, for their kind support and feedback.
    [Show full text]
  • A Stylistic Analysis of 2Pac Shakur's Rap Lyrics: in the Perpspective of Paul Grice's Theory of Implicature
    California State University, San Bernardino CSUSB ScholarWorks Theses Digitization Project John M. Pfau Library 2002 A stylistic analysis of 2pac Shakur's rap lyrics: In the perpspective of Paul Grice's theory of implicature Christopher Darnell Campbell Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project Part of the Rhetoric Commons Recommended Citation Campbell, Christopher Darnell, "A stylistic analysis of 2pac Shakur's rap lyrics: In the perpspective of Paul Grice's theory of implicature" (2002). Theses Digitization Project. 2130. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project/2130 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the John M. Pfau Library at CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses Digitization Project by an authorized administrator of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A STYLISTIC ANALYSIS OF 2PAC SHAKUR'S RAP LYRICS: IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF PAUL GRICE'S THEORY OF IMPLICATURE A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in English: English Composition by Christopher Darnell Campbell September 2002 A STYLISTIC ANALYSIS OF 2PAC SHAKUR'S RAP LYRICS: IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF PAUL GRICE'S THEORY OF IMPLICATURE A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino by Christopher Darnell Campbell September 2002 Approved.by: 7=12 Date Bruce Golden, English ABSTRACT 2pac Shakur (a.k.a Makaveli) was a prolific rapper, poet, revolutionary, and thug. His lyrics were bold, unconventional, truthful, controversial, metaphorical and vulgar.
    [Show full text]