DOCSLIB.ORG

Roster 1904 Revised

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Roster 1904 Revised ROSTER .oF REGISTERED ATTORNEYS ENTITLED TO-PRACTICE BEFORE THE UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE. ) REVISED J'ANU ARY :20, IC)04. pruc~· TWENTY <;:ENTS. f WASHINGTON: GOVERNMENT' PRINTING OFFICE. 19°4· EXTRACTS FRO~i THE RULES OF PRACTICE. I ~ , . APPOINTMENT. RULE 17. An applicant or an a~3Signee of the entire interest may [I prosecute his own case, but he is advised, unless f~miliar with . r:· such matters, to employ a competent attorney, as the value of ! patents depends largely upon the skillful preparation of the speci­ i I fication and claims. The office can not aid in the selection of·.an I attorney. REGISTR..;\-TION. A register of attorneys will be'kept in this office, on which will be eUter-ed the names of all persons entitled to represent applimlnts before the Patent Office in the presentation al).d prosecution of applications for. patent. The names of persons in the following .classes will, upon their written request,. be entered upon this i j register. / . !I '. (q.) Any person/who on June 18, 1897, was engaged as attorney or a'ient in the a6tive prosecution of applications for patent before this office, or had been so engaged at any time within five years prior thereto and is not disbarred, or is or was during such period .( a menlber of a firm so engaged and not disbarred, providE;3d that such person shall, if required, furnish information as to one or . I more applications for patent so prosecuted by him. , I (b) Any attorney at law who is in gOod standing in any court I of record in the United States or any of the States or Territories thereof and shall furnish' a certificate of the clerk 'of such·United States, State, or Territorial court, duly authenticated under the . seal' of 'the court, that he.is an attorney in good standing. .l'l i-- -(0) Any person who has been regularly recognized as an attorney j or ,agent to represent claimants before the Department of the· Interior or any bureau thereof and is in good standing, provided that such person shall furnish a statement of the date of his admission to practice as such attorney or agent, and shall further show, if required by the Commissioner, that he is possessed of the IJ I necessary qu.alifications. t.o render applicants for patents valuable I service, and is othE;3rwise comp~tent to advise and assist them in i the presentation and prosecution of their applications before the 1-· I Patent OffiC8. (3)' ., 4 EXTRACTS FROlVI THE RULES: OF PRACTICE., EXTRACTS FRO1\{ THE RULES OF PRACTICE. 5 (d) Any person 'not an attorney at law who shall file a certifi­ NAl\IES OF MEMBERS OF A FIRM MUST BE GIVEN. cate from a judge of a United St~tes, State, or Territorial court, dulY,autHenticated under the seal of the court, that such person is A power of atto'rlley· purporting to have been given to a fil~m or of good moral character and of good I'epute and possessed, of the copartnership will not be recognized, ,either in favo!' of the firm necessary qualifications to enable him, to render applicants for or of any of its members, unless all its members shall be named patents valuable 'service, and is otherwise competent to, advise in such power of attorney. ' and assist them in the presentation and prosecution of their appli- cations before the Patent Office. , SUBSTITUTION AND ASSOCIATION. (e) Any firm which on June 18, 1897, was engaged in the active RULE i9. Substitution or association can be made by an attorney prosecution as attorneys or ag~nts of applications for patents upon the written authorization of his principal; but such authori­ before the Patent Office, or had been so engaged at any time within zation will not e1?power th~ se~ond agent to appoint a ~hird. five years prior thereto, providec1 such firm or any member thereof is not disbarred, provided the names of the individuals composing REVOCATION. the firm are ,stated; and, provided, also, that such firm shall,' if required, f,urnish 'information as to one or more applications , RUL1TI, 20. Powers of attorney may be revoked at any stage in the proceedings of a ca~e upon application to a:nd approval by the prosecuted beforethe Patent Office by them.' !, , , (f) Any firm not entitled to regis,tration under the preceding Commissioner; and when so revoked the office will communicate sections which shall show that the individuals composing the,flrm directly with the applicant, or sUGh other attoi'ney as he may are each and all recognized as patent attorneys or agents, or are" appob:l_t. An attorney, will be promptly notified by the docket each and all entitled to be so recognized under the preceding clerk of the revocation of his power of attorney~ An assignment sections of this rule. of an undivided interest will not operate as a revocation of the The Commissioner ,may demand additional proo,f of qualifica­ 'p~nverpreviously :given; but the assignee of the entire interest tionsand reServe the right to decline to recognize any attorney, may be represented!y an attorney of his own ~election. agent, 0'1' other person applying for registration under this rule. 4, ACqESS TO PENDING APPLICATIONS.' LIlVIITED RECOGNITION. Order No. ,127' l.-H81~eafter no person except the applicant, the Any person or firm not regtstered' and not entitled to be recog- assignee ~hose assignment is of record, or the attorney of record ,nized under this rule as an attorney or agent to ~epresent applicaIlts will be permitted to have access to the file of any application, generally may, 'upon a showing of circumstances' which render it' except' as provided for under the interference rules, unless written 'necessary or justifiable, be ~>ecognized by the Commission'er to authority from the applicant, assignee, or attorney, identifying prosecute as attorney or agent cert~in, specified application or appli­ the application to be inspected, is filed in the case to become a part cations, but this limited recognition shall not extend furth81: than' of the ,record thereof, or qpon the written order of the Commis­ the application or applications named,.', , , sioner" which will also become 'a part of'the record of the case.- I [0. G., April,4, 1899.] NONRECOGNITION. JULY 1, i900. No person not registered as apove provided will he permitted to prosecute applications before thepa:tent Office. ' , , , POWER OF ATTORNEY '1'0 BE FILED. RULE 18. Before any attorney, original 'or associate, will be , allowed to inspect papers or take action of any kind, his power of' attorney must befiled. But general powers given by a principal' to an associate can not be, considered. In ,each application the' written authorization, must be flIed . ALPHABETICAL LIST OF A1'TORNEYS HEGISTERED TO' PRACTICE . BEFORE THE UNITED STATES pATENT OFFICE. REVISED JANUARY 20, 1904. Registration No. 1999 Abbot, H. S., Longbeach, Los Angeles County, Cal. 448 Abbott, E. W., 10 Whitney Opera House Block, Detroit, Mich. 4475 Abbott, O. A., Michelsen Building, Grand Island, Nebr. I . l. 152 Abbott, Phillips, 206 Broadway, New York. N. Y . 2972 Abbott, V. H., Carrollton, Ky. - ,. 1653 Acker, J. Fred, 361 Broadway, New York, N. Y. 553 Acker, N. A., 14 Sansome street, San Francisco, Cal: .. 1652 ~cker, SamueIN., 1434 S street NW., Washington, D. C. 1916 Adams, Albert H., 1147 Monadnock Building, Chicago, Ill. 3090 Adams, Alton D., box 1377, Boston, Mass. 4875 Adams, .Emily, H., 10 Colman Block, Seattle, ·Wash. ,574 Adams, Frank E., room 10 Colman Block, Seattle, Wash. 6108 Adams, James ML, 118 South Mechanic street, Jackson, Mich. 5789 Adams, John RIl\{cGill Bqilding, Washington, D. C. 1467t\,Adamson, Charles E., Muncie, Ind. 1251'-Adcock,' Edmund, suite 906 Marquette Building, Chicago, Ill. 1785 . Addington, A. H., Ridgeville, Ind. 2966 Addington, Keene H., 100 Washington street, Chicago, Ill. 4719 Adler, Isaac, 1008 Granite Building, Rochester, N. Y. 2426 Adriaans, J.H., 494 Louisiana avenue, Washington, D. C. 4614 Agramonte,.C. H.l\:L Y., I-a Independencia No. 4, City of Mexico, Mexico. 5026 Aiken, Albert" C., Mills Building, San Francisco, Cal. 5255 Akers, C. N., Gilfillan Block, St. Paul, Minn. 531 Albee, G. H., 103 The Avenue, Neenah, Wis . ' .4711 ,Albertine, P., jr., Winterthur, Switzerland. 2622 Aldrich, Geo. S., St. Louis, Mich; -- 3009 Aldrich, Geo. S., 160 Market street, Newark, N. J. 3080 Aldrich, J olm, 307 Main. street, Springfield, Mass. 4328 Aleinikoff, Nicholas.' 93 Nassau street, New York, N. Y. 6273 Alexander, Edward R., 705 G'street NW., Washington, D. C. 5719 Alexander, .Eugene D., 31 Nassau street, New York, N. Y. 3003 Alexander, Harry J., Noblesville, Ind. 663 Alexander, John B., 331 Nasby Building, Toledo, Ohio. 1783 Alexander, T. H., 607 Seventh street NW., Washington, D. C. 5872 Alexander & Colby, 120 Broadway, New York, N. Y. 646 Alexander & Davis, 709 G street, Washington, D. C. 446 'Alexander & Dowell, 607 Seventh street NW., Washington, D. C. 592 Allen, A. M., 304 Bell Block, Cincinnati, Ohio. 1222 . Allen, Charles E., No.2 City Hall, Burlington, Vt. 1171 Allen, FrankH., Norwich, Conn. 2110 Allen, Frederick 1.,75 Genesee street, Auburn, N. Y. ) (7) 8 LIST OF ATTORNEYS. LIST OF ATTORNEYS. 9· Registration Registration No. No. 5046 Allen, F. Sturges, 220 Broadway, New York, N. Y. 173 Arnott, Eugene L., Greenfield, Ohio; 4946 Allen, Lafon, Louisville, Ky. 6281 Aronson, Jacob Jay, 150 Nassau street, New York, N. Y. 6143 Allen, Lewis A., 291 Main avenue, Passaic, N. J. 4735 Aronson, Oscar, 87 Nassau street,New York, N. Y. 2306 Allen, Thomas Con., University Chambers, 16'9 Phillip' street, Sydney; .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Holden Block 1027 West Madison Street
    LANDMARK DESIGNATION REPORT Holden Block 1027 West Madison Street Preliminary and Final Landmark Recommendation Adopted by the Commission on Chicago Landmarks, March 3, 2011 CITY OF CHICAGO Richard M. Daley, Mayor Department of Housing and Economic Development Andrew J. Mooney, Commissioner Bureau of Planning and Zoning Historic Preservation Division Cover: The Holden Block at 1027 W. Madison St. is a four-story commercial loft building built in 1872. It is designed in the Italianate architectural style, faced with Buena Vista sandstone, and ornamented with a plethora of finely-crafted stone ornament concentrated around upper-floor windows. The Commission on Chicago Landmarks, whose nine members are appointed by the Mayor and City Council, was established in 1968 by city ordinance. The Commission is responsible for recommending to the City Council which individual buildings, sites, objects, or districts should be designated as Chicago Landmarks, which protects them by law. The landmark designation process begins with a staff study and a preliminary summary of information related to the potential designation criteria. The next step is a preliminary vote by the Landmarks Commission as to whether the proposed landmark is worthy of consideration. This vote not only initiates the formal designation process, but it places the review of city permits for the property under the jurisdiction of the Commission until a final landmark recommendation is acted on by the City Council. This Landmark Designation Report is subject to possible revision and amendment during the designation process. Only language contained within a designation ordinance adopted by the City Council should be regarded as final. HOLDEN BLOCK 1027 West Madison Street Built: 1872 Architect: Stephen Vaughn Shipman The Holden Block, a four-story building located on Chicago’s Near West Side, is an unusual- surviving Italianate “commercial block” from the 1870s.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5/31/2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional certification comments, entries, and narrative items on continuation sheets if needed (NPS Form 10-900a). 1. Name of Property historic name West Loop - LaSalle Street Historic District other names/site number 2. Location Roughly bounded by Wacker Drive, Wells Street, Van Buren Street street & number and Clark Street N/A not for publication N/A city or town Chicago vicinity state Illinois code IL county Cook code 031 zip code 60601-60604 60606, 60610 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property _ meets _ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: national statewide local Signature of certifying official/Title Date State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago Landmarks Address List
    Chicago Landmarks List Following is the list of addresses of those properties designated as Chicago Landmarks by the City Council, as well as those under consideration for designation by the Commission of Chicago Landmarks (as of June 3, 2021). Street Name Address Range Landmark Name E. 8th St. 68 thru 98 (evens) Historic Michigan Boulevard District E. 8th St. 69 thru 99 (odds) Historic Michigan Boulevard District E. 8th St. 75 thru 87 (odds) Essex Inn E. 9th St. 68 thru 98 (evens) Historic Michigan Boulevard District E. 9th St. 69 thru 99 (odds) Historic Michigan Boulevard District W. 9th St. S. Plymouth Ct. (SW corner) Site of John & Mary Jones House E. 11th St. 21 thru 35 (odds) Ludington Building E. 11th St. 69 thru 99 (odds) Historic Michigan Boulevard District E. 11th St. 74 thru 98 (evens) Historic Michigan Boulevard District E. 14th St. 101 thru 115 (odds) Historic Chicago Firehouse W. 15th St. 4200 thru 4212 (evens) Pentecostal Church of Holiness (Preliminary) E. 18th St. 100 thru 116 (evens) Motor Row District E. 18th St. 205 thru 315 (odds) Prairie Avenue District E. 18th St. 221 thru 237 (odds) Glessner House W. 18th St. 524 thru 530 (evens) Schoenhofen Brewery W. 18th St. 1215 thru 1225 (odds) Thalia Hall E. 21st St. 339 thru 371 (odds) R. R. Donnelley Plant W. 22nd Pl. 200 thru 208 (evens) On Leong Building E. 23rd St. 42 thru 132 (evens) Motor Row District E. 23rd St. 63 thru 133 (odds) Motor Row District W. 23rd St. 3634 thru 3658 (evens) Shedd Park Fieldhouse E.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Local Landmarks Using National Park Service Thematic Framework Model Individual Landmarks and Landmark Districts Designated As of August, 2019
    Chicago Landmarks - Analysis of Local Landmarks Using National Park Service Thematic Framework Model Individual Landmarks and Landmark Districts designated as of August, 2019 Landmark Year Constructed Address* Landmark Type Designated Peopling Theme: Institutions Theme: Culture Theme: Politics Theme: Economy Theme: Technology Theme: Environment Theme: GlobalismTheme: 227 East Walton Place Apartment Building 1956 227 E Walton Place, Chicago IL Individual 6/6/2012 300 West Adams Street Office Building 1927 300 W Adams Street, Chicago IL Individual 5/13/2009 333 North Michigan Building 1928 333 N Michigan Avenue, Chicago IL Individual 2/7/1997 35 East Wacker Building / Jewelers' Building 1925-1927 35 E Wacker Drive, Chicago IL Individual 2/9/1994 42nd Precinct/Town Hall Police Station 1907 3600 N Halsted Street, Chicago IL Individual 9/11/2013 63rd Street Bathing Pavilion 1919 6300 E Hayes Drive, Chicago IL Individual 12/8/2004 6901 Ogelsby Cooperative Apartment Building 1928-1929 6901 S Ogelsby Avenue, Chicago IL Individual 9/10/2008 860-880 Lake Shore Drive 1949-1951 860 N Lake Shore Drive, Chicago IL Individual 6/10/1996 Abbott (Dr. Wallace C.) House 1891; 1906 4605 N Hermitage Avenue, Chicago IL Individual 3/1/2006 Jessie and William Adams House 1901 9326 S Pleasant Avenue, Chicago IL Individual 6/16/1994 Jane Addams' Hull House and Dining Room 1856; 1905 800 S Halsted Street, Chicago IL Individual 6/12/1994 Alfred Caldwell Lily Pool 1936-1938 North end of Lincoln Park Zoo at Fullerton Parkway, Chicago IL Individual 11/6/2002 All Saints
    [Show full text]
  • S:\PLDATA\Plan320\CLG Report\20
    Commission on Chicago Landmarks CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2010 The Commission on Chicago Landmarks (the “Commission”), whose members are appointed by the Mayor and the City Council, was established in 1968 by City ordinance. The Commission is responsible for recommending to the City Council which areas, districts, places, buildings, structures, works of art, and other similar objects within the City of Chicago should be designated as Chicago Landmarks, which protects them by law. As part of the City’s 2011 budget, a departmental reorganization was proposed which included the merger of the Department of Zoning and Land Use Planning (which includes the Historic Preservation Division that staffs the Commission) and the Department of Community Development. Adopted by City Council in November 2010, and effective January 1, 2011, a new Department of Housing and Economic Development (HED) was created. The Historic Preservation Division will continue to staff the Commission on Chicago Landmarks and is part of the new department. The Acting HED Commissioner is Andrew J. Mooney. As part of the reorganization, the Chicago Landmarks Ordinance was amended to reduce the Commission membership from ten to nine members to reflect this new department organization, with the ninth member being the HED Commissioner (or his or her designee) as an ex-officio member. This annual report has been prepared in fulfillment of the City of Chicago’s annual reporting requirement under the National Park Services’s Certified Local Government Program established under the National Historic Preservation Act. The City of Chicago has been a “Certified Local Government” since 1985. 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Commission on Chicago Landmarks
    COMMISSION ON CHICAGO LANDMARKS The Miracle House, 2001 N. Nordica Ave., 1954, Belli & Belli Architects and Engineers, Inc. CHICAGO LANDMARKS Individual Landmarks and Landmark Districts designated as of May 27, 2021 City of Chicago Lori E. Lightfoot, Mayor Department of Planning and Development Commission on Chicago Landmarks Maurice D. Cox, Commissioner Ernest Wong, Chairman Bureau of Citywide Systems & Historic Preservation Kathy Dickhut, Deputy Commissioner Chicago Landmarks are those buildings, sites, objects, or districts that have been officially designated by the City Council. They are recommended for landmark designation by the Commission on Chicago Landmarks, a nine-member board appointed by the Mayor and City Council. The Commission is also responsible for reviewing any proposed alteration, demolition, or new construction affecting individual landmarks or landmark districts. The date the landmark was designated is shown in parentheses. 2 INDIVIDUAL LANDMARKS (365 Total) 1. Dr. Wallace C. Abbott House ~ 4605 N. Hermitage Ave. 1891; Dahlgren and Lievendahl. Rear Addition: 1906; architect unknown. (March 1, 2006) 2. Jessie and William Adams House ~ 9326 S. Pleasant Ave.; 1901; Frank Lloyd Wright. (June 16, 1994) 3. Jane Addams’ Hull House and Dining Room ~ 800 S. Halsted St; House: 1856; architect unknown. Dining Hall: 1905; Pond and Pond. (June 12, 1974) 4. All Saints Church and Rectory ~ 4550 N. Hermitage Ave.; 1883; John C. Cochrane. (December 27, 1982) 5. Allerton Hotel ~ 701 N. Michigan Ave.; 1922; Murgatroyd & Ogden with Fugard & Knapp. (April 29, 1998) 6. American Book Company Building ~ 320-330 E. Cermak Rd.; 1912, Nelson Max Dunning. (July 29, 2009) 7. American School of Correspondence ~ 850 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Meeting Commission on Chicago Landmarks December 5, 2013
    MINUTES OF THE MEETING COMMISSION ON CHICAGO LANDMARKS DECEMBER 5, 2013 The Commission on Chicago Landmarks held their regularly scheduled meeting on December 5, 2013. The meeting was held at the City Hall, 121 N. LaSalle St., Room 201-A, Chicago, Illinois. The meeting began at 12:46 p.m. PHYSICALLY PRESENT: Rafael Leon, Chairman Jim Houlihan, Vice Chairman Andrew Mooney, Secretary Commissioner of the Department of Housing and Economic Development Anita Blanchard Victor Ignacio Dziekiewicz Tony Hu Mary Ann Smith Ernest Wong ABSENT: John Baird, Commissioner Emeritus ALSO PHYSICALLY PRESENT: Eleanor Gorski, Director of Historic Preservation Department of Housing and Economic Development Lisa Misher, Department of Law, Real Estate Division Members of the Public (The list of those in attendance is on file at the Commission office.) A recording of this meeting is on file at the Department of Housing and Economic Development, Historic Preservation Division offices and is part of the public record of the regular meeting of the Commission on Chicago Landmarks. Commissioner Leon called the meeting to order. 1. Approval of the Minutes of Previous Meeting Regular Meeting of November 7, 2013 Motioned by Wong, seconded by Dziekiewicz. Approved unanimously. (8-0) 2. Preliminary Landmark Recommendation CAIRO SUPPER CLUB BUILDING WARD 46 4015-4017 N. Sheridan Rd. Deferred from the November 7, 2013 Commission meeting. Abby Sullivan, representing Alderman Cappleman, spoke in support of the designation. Vote to adopt the preliminary landmark recommendation for the CAIRO SUPPER CLUB BUILDING. Motioned by Blanchard, seconded by Dziekiewicz. Approved unanimously. (8-0) 3. Demolition of a Portion of a Building Pursuant to §2-120-780 and to §2-120-825 of the Municipal Code – Informational BLACK METROPOLIS-BRONZEVILLE HISTORIC DISTRICT WARD 3 3433-37 S.
    [Show full text]
  • Loop Economic Study & Impact Report
    FEBRUARY, 2011 LOOP ECONOMIC STUDY & IMPACT REPORT ® NORTH AVE. www.chicagoloopalliance.com CHICAGO LOOP ALLIANCE (CLA), a DIVISION ST. Oak Street member-based business organization that Beach represents Chicago’s most dynamic mixed- use district, released a Loop Economic Study in 2006. This important document revealed WELLS ST. significant statistics regarding tourism, CHICAGO AVE. business, residential, higher education, entertainment and culture, retail, and Olive CHICAGO Beach transportation sectors that told the story of a vibrant region ripe for 24/7 livability. In the CENTRAL AREA five years that have passed, the Loop has experienced incredible growth – and withstood NORTH WATER ST. difficult economic times – making it relevant to WACKER DR. N DuSable re-address the Loop data. LAKE ST. HarborW E COLUMBUS DR. S RANDOLPH ST. And so we present an update – the Loop WASHINGTON ST. CHICAGO MADISON ST. Economic Study and Impact Report AVE. ASHLAND 90 DR. WACKER FRANKLIN ST. LOOP MONROE ST. commissioned by CLA and conducted by L 94 a ADAMS ST. Chicago-based Goodman Williams Group Monroe k Harbor e JACKSON BLVD. Real Estate Research. A combination of both M VANBUREN ST. original economic data as well as relevant AVE. MICHIGAN Buckingham EISENHOWER EXPRESSWAY Fountain i 290 CONGRESS PARKWAY c information provided by third-party sources, h i the Loop Economic Study and Impact Report LAKE SHORE DRIVE g a demonstrates the continued diversity, vibrancy n and centrality of the Loop. HALSTED ST. We intend for this report to serve as a critical, comprehensive source for information about economic sectors that impact the vibrancy of the Loop and expect it will serve as an 12th Street Beach invaluable tool in attracting new businesses to Burnham the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase III Architectural and Historical Survey Report- Downtown Dubuque
    “..the finest business street west of Chicago and North of St. Louis…” Phase III Architectural and Historical Survey Report- Downtown Dubuque James E. Jacobsen History Pays! Historic Preservation Consulting Firm, Des Moines June 19, 2003 “…the finest business street west of Chicago and north of St. Louis…” Phase III Architectural and Historical Survey Report-Downtown Dubuque, 2003 Cover Illustration: Downtown Dubuque viewed north from the Fourth Street Elevator, c.1905. Bluff Street runs in the foreground. Note the major factories (Rider-Wallis, Glover) and the original Masonic building all along Locust Street. The Town Clock stands in front of the original Security Building. The white front along Main in the center of the image is the newly remodeled Levi Block (Center for Dubuque History, Loras College, Photographic Collection). Credits and Acknowledgements: This project has been funded with the assistance of a matching grant-in-aid from the State Historical Society of Iowa, Community Programs Bureau, through the Department of the Interior, National Park Service, under provisions of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966; the opinions expressed herein are not necessarily those of the Department of the Interior. This project received Federal funds from the National Park Service. Regulations of the U.S. Department of the Interior strictly prohibit unlawful discrimination in Federally Assisted Programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, age or handicap. Any person who believes he or she has been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility operated by a recipient of federal assistance should write to: Director, Equal Opportunity Program, U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1849 C Street NW, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Walks : Discovery Hikes Through the Peach State’S Natural and Human History / Written by Ren and Helen Davis
    GeorgiaGeorgia WalWalksks GeorgiaGeorgia WalWalksks Discovery Hikes Through the Peach State’s Natural and Human History Ren and Helen Davis Published by PEACHTREE PUBLISHERS, LTD. 1700 Chattahoochee Avenue Atlanta, Georgia 30318-2112 www.peachtree-online.com Copyright © 2001 by Render S. Davis and Helen E. Davis All photos © 2001 by Render S. Davis and Helen E. Davis All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means—electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording, or any other—except for brief quotations in printed reviews, without prior permission of the publisher. Maps by Ortelius Design Design by Loraine M. Joyner Composition by Robin Sherman 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 Manufactured in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Davis, Ren, 1951– Georgia walks : discovery hikes through the peach state’s natural and human history / written by Ren and Helen Davis. – 1st ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 1-56145-212-2 1. Georgia—Tours. 2. Georgia—History, Local. 3. Historic Sites—Georgia—Guidebooks. 4. Parks—Georgia—Guidebooks. 5. Natural History—Georgia—Guidebooks. 6. Walking—Georgia—Guidebooks. 7. Hiking—Georgia—Guidebooks. I. Davis, Helen, 1951– II. Title. F284.3 .D38 2001 917.5804’44–dc21 2001021093 CONTENTS Preface xii 3 Johns Mountain, A Time-Line of Georgia History xiv Keown Falls, and (keyed to sites listed in the guide) Pocket Recreation Area [NH] 19 Georgia Map Walk, 5 miles, with Walks Identified xvii Moderate–Strenuous Site Legend for Table of Contents Mountain and woodland trails with PH: Prehistoric Georgia scenic views of ridges and valleys.
    [Show full text]
  • City Map Final
    DEARBORN ST. CLARK ST. WELLS ST. 0001 CHICAGO RIVER 1 0012 WACKER DR. 0002 LASALLE ST. FRANKLIN ST. 0013 40 3 39 2 WEST LOOP-LASALLE STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT HADDOCK PL. NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES 5 4 29 DISTRICT MAP LAKE ST. 0014 34 JUNE 12, 2013 30 6 0003 42 COUCH PL. 41 7 0015 0016 0017 RANDOLPH ST. 31 8 0004 COURT PL. 9 10 43 45 46 47 49 50 44 11 0005 0020,0021 WASHINGTON ST. 0019 0018 0006 32 13 12 51 52 48 CALHOUN PL. 14 15 54 55 0007 0022 MADISON ST. 17 53 56 0023 35 16 36 18 ARCADE PL. 19 21 0024 20 60 0028 0029 0030 0026,0027 MONROE ST. 0025 0008 61 57 58 22 59 LEGEND 63 24 23 37 38 33 0009 DISTRICT BOUNDARY 62 0010 ADAMS ST. 0031 # CONTRIBUTING RESOURCE 0032 25 26 64 0035 # NON-CONTRIBUTING RESOURCE 34 QUINCY ST. 0011 #### PHOTO NUMBER 0037 28 65 67 69 27 BUILDING ADDITION 0036 ELEVATED STRUCTURE AND STATION 0033 JACKSON BLVD. 0034 68 66 FEDERAL ST. FINANCIAL PL. 72 70 71 CITY OF CHICAGO RAHM EMANUEL, MAYOR VAN BUREN ST. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ANDREW J. MOONEY, COMMISSIONER West Loop – LaSalle Street Historic District Resource Key Page 1 of 2 (NC) indicates a non-contributing resource. Vacant lots are considered non-contributing for the purpose of this nomination. All other resources are considered contributing (C). LaSalle Street 21. 50 S. LaSalle Street The Northern Trust Company 1. LaSalle Street and the Chicago River LaSalle Street Bridge 22.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Value of Industrial Heritage Sites
    INDUSTRIAL DECAY: ENVIRONMENTAL VALUE OF INDUSTRIAL HERITAGE SITES Gwen Stricker Submitted in partial fulfllment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Historic Preservation Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation Columbia University May 2020 This page left intentionally blank GWEN STRICKER COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY SPRING 2020 INDUSTRIALENVIRONMENTAL VALUE OF INDUSTRIAL DECAY HERITAGE SITES GWEN STRICKER COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY SPRING 2020 ABSTRACT Industrial heritage comes with a complex system of values, embodying historical, social, aesthetic, and economic narratives. Representative of a once booming economy, abandoned industrial sites now exemplify the negative consequences of material exploitation, environmental pollution, and deindustrialization. In recognizing these places as heritage, little attention is given to the signifcant mark made on urban and natural landscapes and environments. This thesis argues that industrial heritage sites should be assessed for environmental value as an opportunity to recognize the environment as an interdependence between nature and culture. Ascribing environmental value at these sites involves not only an acknowledgment of the toxic environmental systems that emerged as part of industrial processes but also an analysis of the natural decay and growth of sites after abandonment. This argument will be explored through Chicago’s abandoned industrial heritage sites that are in a state of decay, specifcally the Acme Coke Plant and U.S. Steel’s South Works. The history of Chicago’s
    [Show full text]