Biodiversity Working Group Horton Park Farmhouse, Horton Country Park

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Biodiversity Working Group Horton Park Farmhouse, Horton Country Park Biodiversity Working Group Horton Park Farmhouse, Horton Country Park Wednesday 16th March 2016 10:00-13:00 Notes 1. Present: John Edwards (Surrey CC); Helen Cocker (Surrey CC); Stewart Cocker (Epsom & Ewell BC); David Page (Elmbridge BC); Mike Waite & Jim Jones (Surrey Wildlife Trust); Alistair Kirk (Surrey Biodiversity Information Centre); Henryk Jurk ( Guildford BC); Ann Sankey (Surrey Botanical Society); Rod Shaw (Mole Valley DC); Simon Elson (Surrey CC); David Olliver (Waverley BC) Apologies: Sarah Thompson (Tandridge DC); Cath Rose (Reigate & Banstead BC); Debbie Cousins & Francesca Taylor (Environment Agency); Claire Kerr (RSPB); Gail Jeffcoate (Butterfly Conservation); Sarah Jane Chimbwandira (Surrey Nature Partnership/SWT) 2a. The notes of the meeting 11th November 2015 were agreed Action 2b. Matters Arising: The protocol for SNCIs selected outside Local Plan timetables was discussed (see attached Paper A). There are still outstanding comments to be made on this and consultation is extended to 31/03/16 (any further comments direct to JE please). The All paper can then be taken to (all-Surrey) Planning Working Group for agreement. RS recommended highlighting the planning areas to focus discussion and ideas. HJ - Guildford planners require help to understand national guidance & status underpinning SNCI; will gauge necessity for a meeting with Local Sites Partners JE, MW, HJ AK. There may be existing papers setting out the procedures. RS reminded that Local Sites Partnership must ensure LAs are kept informed of any decision-making around policy, criteria and procedures with regard to SNCI (Local Wildlife Sites). AK is currently JE/AK drawing up a brief for the revision of Surrey SNCI Selection Guidelines (c/f 11/11/15). MW - The Wildlife Trusts is currently considering promotion of an award scheme for SNCI owners demonstrating model safeguard/management, and has produced a generic (national) advice leaflet on good stewardship of SNCI (SWT will be procuring stock for onward distribution); TWT is also pressing Natural England at high-level to incorporate SNCI within priority targeting of the Countryside Stewardship grant. SE suggested importance of getting local government Environmental Portfolio holders on-side; as well as framing biodiversity conservation as ‘half-full’, ie. more positively, so as to present in a more attractive way. Historic England promotes ‘Heritage Champions’ and there may be an equivalent role for ‘Natural heritage/environment champions’ here in Surrey, see; https://historicengland.org.uk/advice/planning/local-heritage/heritage-champions/. JJ suggested the SNP Natural Capital Investment Strategy might highlight an overt valuation of SNCI to bring further attention; JE to check with SJC. JE/MW SNCI re-surveying: Issue of perennial access problems was raised in context of LAs powers-of-entry. RS unsure whether these could be used, as normally only prosecuted under strict issue/event criteria. Danger of incentivising obstructive landowners to destroy potential biodiversity interest was also discussed. Borough SNCI reviews re- visited from 11/11/16 and Waverley BC case in particular; DO intends to raise this. DO BOA Policy Statements & guidance in planning. All suggestions to improve Investing in our County’s future 1 document incorporated and finished document now on SNP website (notified to Bio WG group previously by email), here. Appended Policy Statements available for Thames Valley-Wealden Greensands; remainder (Low Weald & Rivers) still in process. Re-run of ‘Biodiversity & Planning’ lunch-time roadshows to LAs has begun with Waverley BC (on 29/02), where policy for BOAs given a high profile. MW has subsequently assisted relevant Local Plan policy drafting there. BOA Project map to be available on the SNP website; original Opportunity Area Mapping MW/AK Methodology document to be made downloadable from SNP website both incomplete; action c/f. Surrey ‘State of Nature’ Report. MW described his outline of how the SoN could look (distributed Paper B), including several original options now narrowed as that to follow a Biodiversity 2020 (ie. Priority habitats/species, Ecosystem Services/Natural Capital) focus. Aim to be concise and incorporate recommended methodology for monitoring future progress, gains/losses. Other key messages & opportunities inc.; Surrey’s national & international biodiversity responsibilities; Fully document county extinctions/declines/increases/reintroductions; Explore relationship of biological diversity with ecosystem function/Natural Capital; Natural Capital importance to economy, health & well-being, etc. DO - the local dimension very important to parochially-minded councillors. MW is at a MW very early stage but has begun the SoN research work. DP – VC17 Coleoptera Recorder Jonty Denton is currently reviewing local extinctions across Surrey and assessing chances of recovery. 3. Former Surrey BAP Habitat Action Plans SC had previously raised the importance of these (local Epsom & Ewell BAP currently under review and requires a steer). MW asked if any of the former HAP steering groups still met (answer – no). Perceived status of former HAPs (plus x2 SAPs) currently remains in limbo and various authorities continue to make inappropriate reference to them. Agreed that a SNP statement is necessary and would be produced by MW. AK will AK/MW compile the most recent versions with the aim of placing minimum background information on the SNP website (ie. removing their previous objectives/targets). JJ - some of the national HAP Groups have morphed into ‘Advisory Groups’, eg. Hedgerows. MW suggested that this might be the ideal way forward for Surrey, ie. to establish/formalise SNP chief points-of-contact on any action to achieve maintenance/ restoration/creation of Priority/HPI habitats (consolidated as necessary). All agreed – MW MW to research and combine with above. JJ - ‘Hedgerow Heroes’, a SWT citizen science project targeting this Priority habitat to launch in May. 4. BOA Objectives “..Clearly more is now required to help inform and prioritise the action necessary to achieve [BOAs’] individual objectives, as well as to monitor their real effectiveness in serving collectively as a coherent ecological network across and beyond Surrey... Ideally, the key stakeholder land managers would unite to form a project delivery partnership active in every BOA..” (from BOAs document) SE had raised approaches to BOA objective delivery as an agenda item. There are various examples of the above already operational with delivery of BOA objectives, including; the Wey, Mole, Hogsmill Blackwater (River Loddon) and Eden (River Medway) Catchment (CaBA) partnerships; Holmesdale (WG11); West Weald Landscape Project (LW01), as well as the SCC Countryside Partnerships (Downlands in various ND BOAs, Investing in our County’s future 2 Heathland Project in various TBH & WG BOAs). SE presented his recent document (Holmesdale, the creation of a new woodland), explaining its intended role in explaining the aims and objective of the landscape approach while also helping to shape the identity of the BOA. Of course, different approaches will be more appropriate in different areas. An emerging delivery model is currently under application to the Countryside Stewardship Facilitation fund (NE administered), whereby a landowner advice project officer would be funded across a particular priority landscape, in this case the North Downs scarp between Dorking and Guildford (ie. old ‘Mid Surrey Downs’ project area, now BOA ND02). Both HJ and SJC attended from the SNP. If successful Officer would MW be Shaun Page (FWAG Advice). MW to keep group updated. 5. Re-wilding in Surrey? SE interested in whether there is anywhere in Surrey that might conceivably support this approach and if we might need some SNP policy/statement around the topic. There was a wide-ranging discussion comparing the Knepp Estate in West Sussex, as well as the extensive MoD ranges in the west of Surrey. Priority species reintroductions were also covered; Pine marten (there being a call for suitable English introduction sites by the Vincent Wildlife Trust); also European beaver (introductions under trial in Scotland and England). Pirbright and/or Ash Ranges in the upper catchment of the Wey might indeed be suitable for eventual beaver introduction, as would sites on the upper catchments of the Mole (Gatwick Airport?) and Eden. DO and DP both warned of likely negative reaction to any notion of reintroducing long-eradicated ‘wild’ species from large quarters SE/JJ of home-counties Surrey. SE and JJ to draft a SNP re-wilding discussion statement. 6. Partner Updates DP (Elmbridge BC): Large-scale conifer clearance for tree safety undertaken alongside A3, but allowing for natural regeneration. x14 new ponds created across Esher Commons area (BOA TBL03). RS (Mole Valley DC): will be considering new biodiversity surveys (including SNCI) for emerging Local Plan. AK (SBIC): Reported on 2016 Recorders’ Meeting held in February. GJ has suggested a SNCI presentation for next year’s agenda. Natural England has withdrawn its national funding support for local record centres although the EA will continue its funding contribution in recognition of their critical importance. SC (E&E BC): Langley Vale Farm, the Woodland Trust Centenary Woodland site is currently subject to x3 EIAs, the FC one and one each for the x2 LAs involved in applications for access, car-parking etc. These are due in 06/16. E&E development control intends to soon introduce its Biodiversity
Recommended publications
  • SNCI Review Summary Sheet Site Name: Dene Fields Recorder
    SNCI Review Summary Sheet Site name: Dene Fields Recorder number: 15076 Grid Ref: TQ269573 Borough: Reigate and Banstead Ward: Chipstead, Hooley & Woodmansterne Date of previous surveys: 21/6/1995 11/8/2008 Date of last survey: 1/8/2013 & 7/8/2013 Date selected as SNCI: 2009 Previous reviews: N/A Date of last review: 28/1/2014 (by Local Sites Partnership) Previous status of site: SNCI Current status of site: SNCI Reason for Selection The site is selected for its calcareous grassland habitat which supports a high diversity of species. 29 species typical of grassland of conservation interest in Surrey have been recorded on the site. Dwarf Spurge, Euphorbia exigua (Nationally Scarce) has been recorded on the site. The site’s position is important adjacent to Fames Rough, part of Chipstead Downs Site of Special Scientific Interest. Changes at latest review No change R & B SNCI Surveys 2013: Review of existing site Site Name: Dene Fields Recorder Number: 15076 Grid Ref: TQ 269 573 Parish: N/A Ward: Chipstead, Hooley & Woodmansterne Area of SNCI: 30.6 ha Previous SNCI surveys: 11/08/2008 ,Sue Cooper Surveyor (s): 21/6/1995 M. Williams & A. Tutt Date of current survey: 1/8/2013 & 7/8/2013, Surveyor(s): Sue Cooper Site description The site is located on the west side of Chipstead Valley adjacent to Chipstead Downs SSSI. It comprises chalk grassland, hedgerows and plantation. It is situated on a brown rendzina soil overlying the Upper Chalk crossing on to clay at the top of the site at approximately the 150m contour.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterfly Conservation
    Get involved • Join Butterfly Conservation and help save butterflies and moths • Visit the website and subscribe to our Facebook and Twitter feeds Butterfly Conservation • Record your sightings and submit them, e.g. using the iRecord Surrey & SW London Branch Butterflies smartphone app • Join a field trip to see butterflies in their natural habitat • Take part in the Big Butterfly Count in July-August • Help the Branch survey for butterflies and moths • Have fun volunteering and get fit on a conservation work party • Help publicise the Branch’s work at public events • Walk a transect to monitor butterflies through the season • Take part in the Garden Moths Scheme • Get involved in helping to run the Branch © Bill Downey Bill © Conservation work party for the Small Blue Stepping Stones project About Butterfly Conservation Butterfly Conservation is the UK charity dedicated to saving butterflies and moths, which are key indicators of the health of our environment. Butterfly Conservation improves landscapes for butterflies and moths, creating a better environment for us all. Join at www.butterfly-conservation.org The Surrey & SW London Branch area covers the present county of Surrey (excluding Spelthorne) and the London Boroughs of Richmond, Wandsworth, Lambeth, Southwark, Kingston, Merton, Sutton and Croydon. See www.butterfly-conservation.org/surrey or phone 07572 612722. Butterfly Conservation is a company limited by guarantee, registered in England (2206468). Tel: 01929 400 209. Registered Office: Manor Yard, East Lulworth, Dorset, BH20 5QP. Charity registered in England & Wales (254937) and in Scotland (SCO39268). Published by the Surrey & SW London Branch of Butterfly Conservation © 2018 Where to go What we do Everyone loves butterflies and we Monitoring and surveying are fortunate that 41 species can Volunteers walk weekly routes, be seen in Surrey, along with 500 called “transects”, on around 100 moths and 1,100 micro-moths.
    [Show full text]
  • North Downs Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statements
    Biodiversity Opportunity Areas: the basis for realising Surrey’s ecological network Appendix 6: North Downs Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statements ND01: North Downs Scarp; The Hog's Back ND02: North Downs Scarp & Dip; Guildford to the Mole Gap ND03: North Downs Scarp & Dip; Mole Gap to Reigate ND04: North Downs; Epsom Downs to Nonsuch Park ND05: North Downs; Banstead Woods & Downs and Chipstead Downs ND06: North Downs Scarp; Quarry Hangers to the A22 ND07: North Downs Scarp; Woldingham ND08: North Downs; Banstead & Walton Heaths December 2015 Investing in our County’s future Surrey Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statement Biodiversity Opportunity Area ND01: North Downs Scarp; The Hog’s Back Local authorities: Guildford, Waverley Aim & justification: The aim of Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (BOAs) is to establish a strategic framework for conserving and enhancing biodiversity at a landscape-scale, making our wildlife more robust to changing climate and socio-economic pressures. BOAs are those areas where targeted maintenance, restoration and creation of Natural Environment & Rural Communities (NERC) Act ‘Habitats of Principal Importance’, ie. Priority habitats will have the greatest benefit towards achieving this aim. Recognition of BOAs directly meets National Planning Policy Framework policy for the planning system to contribute to international commitments for halting the overall decline in biodiversity, by establishing coherent ecological networks that are more resilient to current and future pressures (para. 109). Designation of BOAs in local plans will also fulfil NPPF requirements to plan for biodiversity at a landscape-scale across local authority boundaries; and identify & map components of the local ecological networks (para. 117). Explanatory BOAs identify the most important areas for wildlife conservation remaining in Surrey and each include a variety of habitats, providing for an ‘ecosystem approach’ to nature conservation across and beyond the county.
    [Show full text]
  • Version 3 | July 2018 Contents
    Volunteer handbook Version 3 | July 2018 Contents 3. Welcome to Surrey Wildlife Trust 4. About Surrey Wildlife Trust 5. What is volunteering 6. Volunteer roles & responsibilities 7. Important information 9. The social aspect 10. Map of managed sites 11. Site list Contact details The Volunteer Development Team, Surrey Wildlife Trust, School Lane Pirbright, Surrey GU24 0JN © Surrey Wildlife Trust 2018 Registered Charity No 208123 Welcome to Surrey Wildlife Trust! Now you have signed up to volunteering, you will be part of a network of volunteers who help the Trust to make a real difference for nature You could be... SAVING THREATENED HABITATS… SURVEYING PROTECTED SPECIES INSPIRING A THE NEXT GENERAtion… RAISING AWARENESS IN YOUR LOCAL COMMUNITY Volunteers are an important and valued part of Surrey Wildlife Trust (SWT) and this is your chance to make a real contribution to local conservation. We hope that you enjoy volunteering with us and feel part of our team. Founded by volunteers in 1959 the same ideals still remain at the core of the organisation today, with volunteers working alongside our staff in just about every aspect of the Trust. The partnership between the Trust and its volunteers has enabled us to advance nature conservation and awareness in the county and we are committed to continuing this vital work. This handbook has been produced by the Volunteer Development team and includes the main information you’ll need to know about volunteering with Surrey Wildlife Trust. Welcome and thank you for your support! Surrey Wildlife Trust Volunteer Handbook | 3 About Surrey Wildlife Trust Surrey Wildlife Trust is committed to helping wildlife to survive and thrive across the county Surrey Wildlife Trust is one of 46 Wildlife Trusts working across the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • R E S U L T S F R O M 2 0 1 3 D R I V I N G T R a N S E C T S a C R O S S T H E T H a M E S B a S I N H E a T H S S P
    Results from 2013 driving transects across the Thames Basin Heaths SPA 1 Results from 2013 driving transects across the Thames Basin Heaths SPA 2 Results from 2013 driving transects across the Thames Basin Heaths SPA Date: September 2013 Version: Final Recommended Citation: Fearnley, H. (2013). Results from the June 2013 driving transects across the Thames Basin Heaths SPA. Footprint Ecology. 3 Results from 2013 driving transects across the Thames Basin Heaths SPA Summary Car parking provision across the SPA Across the SPA 160 car parking areas were identified with a space for an estimated 2,118 parked vehicles. Three parking areas had been closed since the last count and two previously unmapped parking areas were identified. Car park transects Three weekday and three weekend driving transects were conducted counting all parked vehicles in the 161 car parking areas over a 2 hour time window. In total 3,164 parked vehicles were recorded with an average of 527 per count. Significantly more vehicles were recorded on the weekend (1,881) compared to the weekday (1,283) counts. There was a significant relationship between the capacity of a car park and the number of parked vehicles. In total 8 commercial dog walking vans were observed parked adjacent to SPA access points and 79 parked vehicles had bike racks. Estimation of visitors from car park transect data The car park transect data were scaled up using the mean vehicle occupancy value calculated from the face to face visitor work in 2012 (Fearnley & Liley 2012). We estimate the car park transect data captures visitor information from 5,219 people and their 3,179 dogs.
    [Show full text]
  • Chipstead to Kingswood Walk
    Saturday Walkers Club www.walkingclub.org.uk Chipstead to Kingswood walk Ancient woodland, open downs and farmland in London's Green Belt Length Main Walk: 15½ km (9.6 miles). Three hours 55 minutes walking time. For the whole excursion including trains, sights and meals, allow at least 7½ hours. Circular Walk, returning to Chipstead: 13¾ km (8.5 miles). Three hours 25 minutes walking time. Short Walk, omitting loop to Mugswell: 11 km (6.8 miles). Two hours 45 minutes walking time. Short Circular Walk, omitting Mugswell: 9¼ km (5.7 miles). Two hours 15 minutes walking time. OS Map Explorer 146. Chipstead, map reference TQ276583, is in Surrey, 6 km S of Sutton. Toughness 5 out of 10 (4 for the Circular Walk, 3 for the Short Walks). Features Just outside the London boundary, this undulating walk takes in a varied landscape of ancient woodland, open downs and farmland. You will have plenty of company in the popular recreational areas of Banstead Wood and Chipstead Downs, but few dog- walkers venture across the railway into the network of footpaths, horse rides and quiet lanes which make up the walk's middle section. Near the start the main route follows a substantial part of the Banstead Woods Nature Trail, with panels along the trail highlighting the diversity of species. This ancient woodland was an important source of compass timber until the mid-19thC: large curved or crooked pieces of oak artificially shaped to make specialised sections for the wooden naval ships of that era. More recently the trunks of felled trees have been utilised by a local tree artist to create a series of sculptures illustrating the CS Lewis Narnia books.
    [Show full text]
  • North Downs Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statements
    Biodiversity Opportunity Areas: the basis for realising Surrey’s ecological network Appendix 6: North Downs Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statements ND01: North Downs Scarp; The Hog's Back ND02: North Downs Scarp & Dip; Guildford to the Mole Gap ND03: North Downs Scarp & Dip; Mole Gap to Reigate ND04: North Downs; Epsom Downs to Nonsuch Park ND05: North Downs; Banstead Woods & Downs and Chipstead Downs ND06: North Downs Scarp; Quarry Hangers to the A22 ND07: North Downs Scarp; Woldingham ND08: North Downs; Banstead & Walton Heaths September 2019 Investing in our County’s future Surrey Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statement Biodiversity Opportunity Area ND01: North Downs Scarp; The Hog’s Back Local authorities: Guildford, Waverley Aim & justification: The aim of Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (BOAs) is to establish a strategic framework for conserving and enhancing biodiversity at a landscape scale, making our wildlife more robust to changing climate and socio-economic pressures. BOAs are those areas where targeted maintenance, restoration and creation of Natural Environment & Rural Communities (NERC) Act ‘Habitats of Principal Importance’, ie. Priority habitats will have the greatest benefit towards achieving this aim. Realising BOA aims will contribute to UK commitments to halt biodiversity declines, and their recognition directly meets current National Planning Policy Framework policy to plan strategically for the enhancement of the natural environment; to be achieved by providing net gains for biodiversity and establishing coherent ecological networks that are more resilient to current and future pressures (para. 170). Designation of BOAs also fulfils NPPF requirements to identify, map and safeguard components of wider ecological networks, and areas identified for habitat management, enhancement, restoration or creation (para.
    [Show full text]
  • Volunteer - Handbook
    Volunteer - handbook - Version 2 | May 2017 Contents Volunteer Handbook 3. Welcome to Surrey Wildlife Trust 4. About Surrey Wildlife Trust 5. What is volunteering 5. What do volunteers do? 5. Who can volunteer? 5. Why volunteer with us? 5. Do volunteers have to be members? 5. Do you need prior experience? 6. Volunteer roles & responsibilities 6. Our responsibilities to you 7. Important information 7.Registration and induction 7. Being a Trust representative 7. Expenses and timesheets 7. Supervision and support 8. Training and development 8. Voluntary Conservation Trainees 8. Policies and procedures 10. The social aspect 11. Managed sites 12. Site list Contact details The Volunteer Development Team, Surrey Wildlife Trust, School Lane Pirbright, Surrey GU24 0JN © Surrey Wildlife Trust 2016 Registered Charity No 208123, Surrey Wildlife Trust Ltd. is a company limited by guarantee, registered in England no. 645176, VAT No 791.3799.78 Scrub control, Water Vole, Grass Snake, Jon Hawkins; Dormouse, Tom Marshall; Muddy hands, Julie Norman; Heather, Tom Marshall; Grassland survey, woodland survey, family pond dipping, Matthew Roberts; Bee Orchid, P. Precey; River survey, Karen Lloyd; Box checking, Lizzie Wilberforce; Otter, Elliott Neep Welcome to Surrey Wildlife Trust! Now you have signed up to volunteering, you will be part of a network of over 1000 volunteers who help the Trust to make a real difference for nature You could be saving threatened habitats… ….Or surveying protected species You could be inspiring a child to try pond dipping… ….Or raising awareness in your local community Volunteers are an important and valued part of Surrey Wildlife Trust (SWT) and this is your chance to make a real contribution to local conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Local Plan
    Our Local Plan Local Plan: Garden Villages Consultation (Regulation 18) 14 August 2017 to 9 October 2017 Foreword Foreword In this consultation we are considering four possible locations for a garden village. This type of development is a major part of our preferred strategy for the future delivery of housing. A garden village is a once in a generation opportunity to provide the new affordable homes we desperately need and which will enable young people to be able to afford to live and remain in our district. The district is 94% Green Belt and we will only need to release around 1% to develop a Garden Village. This approach will allow us to prevent a scattergun approach to development and reduce pressure on existing built up areas, while enabling us to protect the rest of our Green Belt. The Council is committed to only amending the Green Belt boundary in locations where its purposes are not served, where the community benefit is evident and where exceptional circumstances are demonstrated. A garden village will allow us to deliver a desirable, modern and sustainable development. We want to create a cohesive community which makes the most of innovation and technology to create a community led development where people are proud to live. It will provide a mix of types and sizes of homes, including substantial amounts of affordable housing and lower cost market housing, homes for older people looking to downsize, life time homes and assisted living. It will enable us to seek infrastructure improvements, which will benefit not only the new community, but everyone across the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Banstead Area University of the Third Age Registered Charity No: 1049254
    U3A - Banstead Area University of the Third Age Registered Charity No: 1049254 Newsletter ~ January 2018 Picture by Philip Cakebread Printed by Chipstead Services CONTENTS OPEN MEETINGS 2 ……. CHAIRMAN’S ADDRESS Meetings are held at The Banstead Community Hall 3 ……. NEW MEMBERS Park Road, BANSTEAD SM7 3AJ Banstead and 3 ……. GROUP UPDATES St Mark’s Church Hall 3 ……. Popular Music Great Tattenhams, Epsom Downs KT18 5RD 3 ……. Explore London 1 Meetings start PROMPTLY at 2.30 pm A.D.2012 4 ……. Explore London 3 (please come early!) 4 ……. The Walking Book Group Wild Flower Walks (See page 7) Thursday 22nd February 2018 Keeping Safe Indoors and Out otium cum dignitate 4 ……. QUIZ At St Mark’s Church Hall, Great Tattenhams ****** 5 ……. PREVIOUS OPEN MEETINGS Wednesday 18th April 2018 The Odette Ellicott Lecture 5 ……. MEMBERS NOTICE BOARD For Banstead U3A Members Only 5 ……. Do You Frame Pictures? At Banstead Community Hall 5 ……. Ashdown Sailing Club ****** Wednesday 2nd May 2018 6 ……. ANSWERS TO QUIZ The Gage Players performing 2 one Act plays A Banstead Art’s Festival event 6 …… WHAT’S COMING UP At Banstead Community Hall 8 p.m. FUTURE OPEN MEETINGS ****** 6 ……. Keeping Safe Indoors and Out Thursday 14th June 2018 6 ……. Odette Ellicott Lecture A Virtual Tour of Big Ben Major Impacts of WW1 At St Mark’s Church Hall, Great Tattenhams 6 ……. Banstead Festival event ****** The Gage Players Wednesday 18th July 2018 6 ……. A Virtual Tour of Big Ben Subject to be confirmed At Banstead Community Hall 7 ……. LOOKING BEYOND BANSTEAD ****** th 7 ……. U3A Summer School 2018 Wednesday 19 September 2018 8 ..…… Joint Local U3A Science Lectures Open House At Banstead Community Hall 8 …….
    [Show full text]
  • Visitor Access Patterns on the Thames Basin Heaths SPA Visitor Questionnaire Survey 2018
    Visitor Access Patterns on the Thames Basin Heaths SPA Visitor Questionnaire Survey 2018 Prepared on behalf of Natural England Final Report 11 December 2018 18/35-1C Ecological Planning & Research Ltd The Barn, Micheldever Station, Winchester, Hampshire SO21 3AR Tel: 01962 794720 Fax: 01962 794721 email: [email protected] www.epr.uk.com Visitor Access Patterns on the Thames Basin Heaths SPA Visitor Questionnaire Survey 2018 Report Release Sheet Draft/Final: Final Report Issue Number: 18/35-1C Date: 11 December 2018 Client: Natural England Northgate House 21-23 Valpy St Reading RG1 1AF Main Author(s): Jodie Southgate BA (Hons) MSc ACIEEM Contributors/Surveyors: Rebecca Brookbank BSc (Hons) PhD MCIEEM Katie Cammack BSc (Hons) MSc GradCIEEM James Mitchell BSc (Hons) Geography & GIS Report Prepared for Issue by: ………………………………… Jodie Southgate BA (Hons) MSc ACIEEM Report Approved for Issue by: ………………………………… Rebecca Brookbank BSc (Hons) PhD MCIEEM Recommended citation: Southgate J., Brookbank R., Cammack K. and Mitchell, J. (2018). Visitor Access Patterns on the Thames Basin Heaths SPA: Visitor Questionnaire Survey 2018. Natural England Commissioned Report. Ecological Planning & Research Ltd, Winchester. Ecological Planning & Research Ltd The Barn, Micheldever Station, Winchester, Hampshire SO21 3AR Tel: 01962 794720 Fax: 01962 794721 email: [email protected] www.epr.uk.com Visitor Access Patterns on the Thames Basin Heaths SPA Visitor Questionnaire Survey 2018 Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SRS News 70.Pub
    www.britishspiders.org.uk S.R.S. News. No. 70 In Newsl. Br. arachnol. Soc. 121 Spider Recording Scheme News July 2011, No. 70 Editor: Peter Harvey; [email protected]@britishspiders.org.uk SRS website: http://srs.britishspiders.org.uk My thanks to those who have contributed to this issue. S.R.S. News No. 71 will be published in November 2011. Please send contributions by the end of September at the latest to Peter Harvey, 32 Lodge Lane, GRAYS, Essex, RM16 2YP; e-mail: [email protected] or [email protected]. The newsletter depends on your contributions! Editorial Thank you to the contributors who have provided encountered on the heathland sites surveyed. articles for this issue. Please help future issues by Where a species is suggested as new for a vice county, providing articles, short or longer, on interesting or an otherwise significant record, this opinion is based discoveries and observations. Also please help by upon the data given in Harvey et al. [eds.] (2002) and the contributing to the collaborative Spider and Harvestman Spider Recording Scheme website (http:// Recording Scheme website. As noted previously, the key srs.britishspiders.org.uk/ - accessed January 2011). aim of the website is to be an interactive and collaborative resource, so please register, upload images and contribute to the forum, species notes and add or edit information on Araneidae sites of interest for spiders and other wildlife. Members of Araneus angulatus Horton Country Park (TQ1861), the BAS and the recording scheme can also interrogate the 9.viii.2010 - two mature females (JSD); Hypsosinga regional maps to access details of the records behind the albovittata Worplesdon, Whitmoor Common (SU9853), tetrads and help identify and log errors - so please register, 10.ix.2009 - on heather; Betchworth, Fraser Down log-on and help! (TQ2152), 23.iv.2010 - on chalk downland (SGD).
    [Show full text]