U:\Open Civil Cases\Novak V. Tucows (06-1909)\Opinion.Wpd
Case 2:06-cv-01909-JFB-ARL Document 47 Filed 03/26/07 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: <pageID> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK _____________________ No 06-CV-1909 (JFB) (ARL) _____________________ ROBERT NOVAK D/B/A PETSWAREHOUSE.COM, Plaintiff, VERSUS TUCOWS, INC., OPENSRS AND NITIN NETWORKS, INC., Defendants. ___________________ MEMORANDUM AND ORDER March 26, 2007 ___________________ JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge: 1125(c). Plaintiff also brings pendent state claims, including: conversion, negligence, Pro se plaintiff Robert Novak (“Novak”) bailee breach of duty, bailee breach of trust, brings the present action against defendants negligent misrepresentation, breach of Tucows, Inc. and its subsidiary, OpenSRS1 contract, tortious interference and intentional (collectively, “Tucows”) and Nitin Networks, infliction of emotional distress. Inc. (“Nitin”) (collectively, “defendants”), alleging that defendants’ transfer of his Presently before the court are defendants’ internet domain name, “petswarehouse.com,” motions to dismiss the complaint pursuant to constituted trademark infringement and Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(3), on the basis of trademark dilution in violation of the Lanham improper venue, or, in the alternative, under Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1114, 1117, 1125(a) & Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(1), on the grounds that plaintiff fails to state a federal claim upon which relief may be granted and, 1 Tucows, Inc. does business under the name absent any federal question, this Court lacks OpenSRS; however, there is no legal entity by the jurisdiction due to an absence of complete name of OpenSRS that is connected with Tucows. diversity between the parties. Plaintiff cross- (Lazare Decl., ¶ 3; Tucows’ Br., at 6 n.6.) moves to strike certain of both defendants’ Therefore, this Court shall consider Tucows, Inc.
[Show full text]