Principles of Conflict of Laws

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Principles of Conflict of Laws Principles of Conflict of Laws Cavendish Publishing Limited London • Sydney EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD PRINCIPLES OF LAW SERIES Professor Paul Dobson Visiting Professor at Anglia Polytechnic University Professor Nigel Gravells Professor of English Law, Nottingham University Professor Phillip Kenny Professor and Head of the Law School, Northumbria University Professor Richard Kidner Professor and Head of the Law Department, University of Wales, Aberystwyth In order to ensure that the material presented by each title maintains the necessary balance between thoroughness in content and accessibility in arrangement, each title in the series has been read and approved by an independent specialist under the aegis of the Editorial Board. The Editorial Board oversees the development of the series as a whole, ensuring a conformity in all these vital aspects. Principles of Conflict of Laws Abla J Mayss, LLM, PhD, Licence en Droît Lecturer in Law University of Liverpool Cavendish Publishing Limited London • Sydney First published in Great Britain 1994 by Cavendish Publishing Limited, The Glass House, Wharton Street, London WC1X 9PX, United Kingdom Telephone: +44 (0) 171 278 8000 Facsimile: +44 (0) 171 278 8080 e-mail: [email protected] Visit our Home Page on http://www.cavendishpublishing.com This title was previously published under the Lecture Notes series. © Mayss, A 1999 First edition 1994 Second edition 1996 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise, except under the terms of the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or under the terms of a licence issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1P 9HE, UK, without the permission in writing of the publisher. Mayss, Abla J Principles of conflict of laws—3rd ed—(Principles of law series) 1. Conflict of laws I. Title 340.9 1 85941 460 5 Printed and bound in Great Britain PREFACE The law in the field of conflict of laws is constantly developing and changing. Since the second edition of this book, a number of important changes, both in terms of courts’ decisions and statutory provisions, have taken place. The object of the present edition of this book is twofold: first, to take account of, and incorporate, these changes; and, secondly, to re-arrange a number of chapters in an attempt to make a notoriously difficult area of law more reader friendly. Thus, Chapters 2 and 3, both of which deal with the jurisdiction of the English court in civil and commercial matters, have been re-written to the effect that Chapter 2 now deals solely with the common law rules and Chapter 3 examines the rules under the Brussels and Lugano Conventions. Chapter 6, entitled ‘Choice of Law in Tort’, has been largely revised to discuss those common law rules which remain applicable to the tort of defamation, and now deals more fully with Part III of the Private International Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1995. Chapters 10 and 11 on Family Law have been greatly amended to take account of the changes brought about by the Family Law Act 1996 and to make this complicated area of law easier to read and understand. The remaining chapters have been revised and amended to take due consideration of new developments in the context of both the common law and various recent statutory provisions. I am grateful to my colleagues in the Faculty of Law at the University of Liverpool for sparing me the time to discuss a number of issues with them, and to the students there. I am also grateful to the editorial team at Cavendish Publishing Ltd for their patience and understanding; and to the Editorial Board, for their helpful comments on the text of this book. I have tried to state the law as it stood on 15 September 1998, although it has been possible to include some later developments. Abla Mayss University of Liverpool December 1998 v CONTENTS Preface v Table of Appendices xvii Table of Cases xix Table of UK Legislation xxxiii Table of European Legislation xxxvii Table of Other Legislation xli Table of Abbreviations xliii 1 NATURE AND SCOPE OF CONFLICT OF LAWS 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1.1 Jurisdiction 1 1.1.2 Choice of law 1 1.1.3 Recognition and enforcement of judgments 1 1.2 PRELIMINARY ISSUES 2 1.2.1 Private and public international law 2 1.2.2 Connecting factors 3 1.2.3 The concept of personal law 4 1.3 THE BASES OF CONFLICT OF LAWS 4 1.3.1 Justice 4 1.3.2 Comity 5 1.3.3 Public policy 5 1.4 CLASSIFICATION OR CHARACTERISATION 6 1.4.1 Classification of the cause of action 6 1.4.2 Classification of a rule of law 7 1.5 RENVOI 8 1.5.1 Single or partial renvoi 9 1.5.2 Double or total renvoi 9 1.6 PROOF OF FOREIGN LAW 9 SUMMARY OF CHAPTER 1 11 2 JURISDICTION OF THE ENGLISH COURT IN COMMERCIAL DISPUTES: THE COMMON LAW RULES 13 2.1 INTRODUCTION 13 2.2 DEFENDANT PRESENT WITHIN THE JURISDICTION 14 2.2.1 Individuals 14 2.2.2 Corporations 14 vii Principles of Conflict of Laws 2.2.3 Partnerships 16 2.3 SUBMISSION TO THE JURISDICTION 16 2.4 DEFENDANT OUTSIDE THE JURISDICTION 16 2.4.1 General 18 2.4.2 Contract 19 2.4.3 Tort 22 2.4.4 Property 22 2.4.5 Other heads 22 2.5 PREVENTION OF FORUM SHOPPING AND THE STAYING OF ACTIONS 23 2.5.1 Forum non conveniens 24 2.5.2 The relevance of lis alibi pendens 33 2.5.3 The relevance of a foreign jurisdiction clause 34 2.6 PREVENTION OF FORUM SHOPPING AND ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTIONS 39 SUMMARY OF CHAPTER 2 45 3 JURISDICTION OF THE ENGLISH COURT IN COMMERCIAL DISPUTES: THE BRUSSELS AND LUGANO CONVENTIONS 47 3.1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 47 3.2 INTERPRETATION OF THE CONVENTION 48 3.3 SCOPE OF THE CONVENTION 49 3.4 THE CONCEPT OF DOMICILE 51 3.4.1 Domicile of individuals 51 3.4.2 Domicile of corporations and associations 52 3.5 THE PRIMARY BASIS OF JURISDICTION 53 3.6 SPECIAL JURISDICTION 55 3.6.1 Contract 55 3.6.2 Tort 58 3.6.3 Restitutionary claims 61 3.6.4 Maintenance 63 3.6.5 Civil claims in criminal proceedings 65 3.6.6 Branch, agency or other establishment 65 3.6.7 Trusts 67 3.6.8 Salvage 67 viii Contents 3.6.9 Further alternative bases of jurisdiction 67 3.7 PROTECTIVE MEASURES 68 3.7.1 Individual contracts of employment 68 3.7.2 Jurisdiction in matters relating to insurance 70 3.7.3 Jurisdiction over consumer contracts 72 3.8 EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION 73 3.9 JURISDICTION AGREEMENTS 74 3.10 SUBMISSION 78 3.11 LIS ALIBI PENDENS AND RELATED ACTIONS 79 3.12 JURISDICTION WITHIN THE UK: THE MODIFIED CONVENTION 82 SUMMARY OF CHAPTER 3 85 4 RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS 87 4.1 INTRODUCTION 87 4.2 RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT AT COMMON LAW 88 4.2.1 Requirements for recognition and enforcement 89 4.2.2 Jurisdiction of the foreign court 90 4.2.3 Residence 91 4.2.4 Submission 92 4.3 FURTHER REQUIREMENTS FOR ENFORCEMENT 94 4.3.1 At common law 94 4.3.2 Administration of Justice Act 1920 97 4.3.3 Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act 1933 97 4.3.4 Restrictions 98 4.4 DEFENCES 98 4.4.1 Fraud 98 4.4.2 Contrary to natural justice 99 4.4.3 Contrary to public policy 100 4.4.4 Section 32 of the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 100 4.4.5 Limitation of actions 102 ix Principles of Conflict of Laws 4.4.6 Res judicata 102 4.5 EC/EFTA JUDGMENTS 103 4.5.1 Mechanisms for enforcement 104 4.5.2 Defences 104 4.6 RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT WITHIN THE UK 106 SUMMARY OF CHAPTER 4 107 5 CHOICE OF LAW IN CONTRACT 109 5.1 INTRODUCTION 109 5.2 THE CONTRACTS (APPLICABLE LAW) ACT 1990; THE ROME CONVENTION 1980 110 5.2.1 Scope of the Convention 110 5.2.2 Matters excluded from the ambit of the Convention 111 5.2.3 The applicable law: express and/or inferred choice of law 112 5.2.4 Applicable law in the absence of choice 115 5.3 SPECIAL RULES FOR SPECIFIC CONTRACTS 119 5.3.1 Certain consumer contracts 119 5.3.2 Individual employment contracts 120 5.4 SPECIFIC ISSUES 122 5.4.1 Material validity 122 5.4.2 Formal validity 123 5.4.3 Capacity 125 5.5 SCOPE OF THE APPLICABLE LAW UNDER THE CONVENTION 125 5.6 LIMITATIONS ON THE APPLICABLE LAW 127 5.6.1 Mandatory rules 127 5.6.2 Public policy 130 5.7 EXCLUSION OF RENVOI 130 SUMMARY OF CHAPTER 5 133 6 CHOICE OF LAW IN TORT 135 6.1 INTRODUCTION 135 x Contents 6.2 THE ENGLISH APPROACH 136 6.3 THE COMMON LAW RULES 136 6.3.1 Torts committed in England 136 6.3.2 Torts committed abroad 137 6.4 PLACE OF TORT 137 6.4.1 Defamation 138 6.4.2 Negligence 139 6.4.3 Fraudulent misrepresentation 139 6.4.4 Economic torts 140 6.5 THE DOUBLE-ACTIONABILITY RULE FOR DEFAMATION 140 6.5.1 An exception to the rule 141 6.5.2 The exception in the Red Sea case 142 6.6 SCOPE OF THE DOUBLE-ACTIONABILITY RULE 143 6.6.1 The same defendant 144 6.6.2 The same plaintiff 144 6.6.3 Contractual defences to claims in tort 145 6.7 PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH THE DOUBLE-ACTIONABILITY RULE AND THE TORT OF DEFAMATION 146 6.8 PART III OF THE PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW (MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ACT 1995 148 6.8.1 The new general rule 149 6.8.2 Exception to the general rule 150 6.8.3 Miscellaneous 151 SUMMARY OF CHAPTER 6 153 7 JUDGMENTS IN FOREIGN CURRENCY 155 7.1 INTRODUCTION 155 7.2 THE NEW APPROACH 155 7.2.1 Breach of contract 156 7.2.2 Damages in tort 157 7.5.3 Restitution 157 7.3 ISSUES ARISING 158 7.4 THE LAW COMMISSION 160 7.5 PART I OF THE PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW (MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ACT 1995 161 xi Principles of Conflict of Laws SUMMARY OF CHAPTER 7 163 8 LAW OF PROPERTY 165 8.1 THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN MOVABLES AND IMMOVABLES 165 8.2 IMMOVABLE PROPERTY 166 8.2.1 Jurisdiction under the traditional
Recommended publications
  • Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in the Commonwealth
    Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in The Commonwealth Struggles for Decriminalisation and Change Edited by Corinne Lennox and Matthew Waites Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in The Commonwealth: Struggles for Decriminalisation and Change Edited by Corinne Lennox and Matthew Waites © Human Rights Consortium, Institute of Commonwealth Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London, 2013 This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NCND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities-digital-library.org ISBN 978-1-912250-13-4 (2018 PDF edition) DOI 10.14296/518.9781912250134 Institute of Commonwealth Studies School of Advanced Study University of London Senate House Malet Street London WC1E 7HU Cover image: Activists at Pride in Entebbe, Uganda, August 2012. Photo © D. David Robinson 2013. Photo originally published in The Advocate (8 August 2012) with approval of Sexual Minorities Uganda (SMUG) and Freedom and Roam Uganda (FARUG). Approval renewed here from SMUG and FARUG, and PRIDE founder Kasha Jacqueline Nabagesera. Published with direct informed consent of the main pictured activist. Contents Abbreviations vii Contributors xi 1 Human rights, sexual orientation and gender identity in the Commonwealth: from history and law to developing activism and transnational dialogues 1 Corinne Lennox and Matthew Waites 2
    [Show full text]
  • Part in the Programme May Be Extended for a Maximum of Two Years
    ACADEMIC NETWORK FOR LEGAL STUDIES ON IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM IN EUROPE A NETWORK FOUNDED WITH THE FINANCIAL SUPPORT OF THE ODYSSEUS PROGRAMME OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION RÉSEAU ACADÉMIQUE D’ÉTUDES JURIDIQUES SUR L’IMMIGRATION ET L’ASILE EN EUROPE UN RESEAU FONDE AVEC LE SOUTIEN FINANCIER DU PROGRAMME ODYSSEUS DE LA COMMISSION EUROPEENNE DIRECTIVE 2001/55 TEMPORARY PROTECTION SYNTHESIS REPORT by GREGOR NOLL & MARKUS GUNNEFLO STUDY ON THE “CONFORMITY CHECKING OF THE TRANSPOSITION BY MEMBER STATES OF 10 EC DIRECTIVES IN THE SECTOR OF ASYLUM AND IMMIGRATION” DONE FOR DG JLS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION END 2007(CONTRACT JLS/B4/2006/03) A Network coordinated by the Institute for European Studies Un Réseau coordonné par l'Institut d'Etudes européennes of the / de l’Université Libre de Bruxelles and composed of academics of the following institutions / et composé de membres du corps académique des institutions suivantes: Université catholique de Louvain (B), Universidade Autonoma de Lisboa (P), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (P), Universität Salzburg (A), Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen (NL), University of Bristol (UK), Universitaet Konstanz (D), Universitaet Göttingen (D), Universidad Pontificia Comillas de Madrid (E), Università degli Studi di Milano (I), Université de Paris-Sud (F), Université de Pau et des pays de l’Adour (F), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), Aarhus Universitet (DK), Umeå Universitet(S), Lunds Universitet (S), Åbo Akademi (FIN), University of Turku (FIN), Eötvös Loránd University (HU), University of Silesia (PL), Mykolas Romeris University (LT), University of Ljubljana (SLO), University of Latvia (LV) TABLE OF CONTENTS I. LIST OF NATIONAL RAPPORTEURS 3 II. GENERAL INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY 4 III.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict of Laws-Application of Full Faith and Credit Clause to State Court's Finding in Support of Its Jurisdiction
    Washington and Lee Law Review Volume 6 | Issue 1 Article 6 Spring 3-1-1949 Conflict Of Laws-Application Of Full Faith And Credit Clause To State Court'S Finding In Support Of Its Jurisdiction Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr Part of the Conflict of Laws Commons Recommended Citation Conflict Of Laws-Application Of Full Faith And Credit Clause To State Court'S Finding In Support Of Its Jurisdiction, 6 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 61 (1949), https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol6/ iss1/6 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington and Lee Law Review at Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington and Lee Law Review by an authorized editor of Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1949 CASE COMMENTS 55 CASE COMMENTS BANKRUPTCY-DEFINITION OF "FARUER" FOR PURPOSES OF RELIEF THROUGH AGRICULTURAL COMPOSITIONS AND EXTENSIONS. [Federal] The availability of relief under the agricultural compositions and extensions phases of federal bankruptcy legislation depends on the pe- titioner's ability to bring himself within the definition of a farmer as set out in Section 75 (r) of the Bankruptcy Act.1 Prior to 1933, the Bankruptcy Act reference to farmers was merely to those "engaged chiefly in fanning or the tillage of the soil."2 However, the special legis- lation of 1933 adopted a definition in the alternative, providing that persons who
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict of Laws: Contracts and Other Obligations F
    Louisiana Law Review Volume 35 | Number 1 Fall 1974 Conflict of Laws: Contracts and Other Obligations F. Michael Adkins Repository Citation F. Michael Adkins, Conflict of Laws: Contracts and Other Obligations, 35 La. L. Rev. (1974) Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol35/iss1/8 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Louisiana Law Review by an authorized editor of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMMENTS CONFLICT OF LAWS: CONTRACTS AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS In ordering relations between parties to a contract, the courts have developed standards for choosing between conflicting laws of two or more jurisdictions in at least four areas of contract law: capac- ity of the parties to contract, availability and nature of the remedy, formal validity, and substantive validity.' Of the fascicle of conflicts rules applicable to such a problem, those providing the substantive law to determine the validity of the alleged contract have been dealt 1. Louisiana jurisprudence peculiarly splits these considerations of conflicts prob- lems sounding in contract into separate categories. Capacity: The law of the domicile of the parties in question controls the capacity to contract. See Pilcher v. Paulk, 228 So. 2d 663 (La. App. 3d Cir. 1969) (minors); Sun Oil Co. v. Guidry, 99 So. 2d 424 (La. App. 1st Cir. 1957) (minors). Louisiana courts have regularly held that the law of the domicile of the parties governs the capacity of a party to contract with his or her spouse for a regime other than the community of gains, or for a settlement or division of property owned in common.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Maltese Legal Hybridity: a Chimeric Illusion Or a Healthy Grafted European Law Mixture? Kevin Aquilina
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Louisiana State University: DigitalCommons @ LSU Law Center Journal of Civil Law Studies Volume 4 Number 2 Mediterranean Legal Hybridity: Mixtures and Movements, the Relationship between the Legal Article 5 and Normative Traditions of the Region; Malta, June 11-12, 2010 12-1-2011 Rethinking Maltese Legal Hybridity: A Chimeric Illusion or a Healthy Grafted European Law Mixture? Kevin Aquilina Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/jcls Part of the Civil Law Commons Repository Citation Kevin Aquilina, Rethinking Maltese Legal Hybridity: A Chimeric Illusion or a Healthy Grafted European Law Mixture?, 4 J. Civ. L. Stud. (2011) Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/jcls/vol4/iss2/5 This Conference Proceeding is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Civil Law Studies by an authorized editor of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RETHINKING MALTESE LEGAL HYBRIDITY: A CHIMERIC ILLUSION OR A HEALTHY GRAFTED EUROPEAN LAW MIXTURE? Kevin Aquilina* Abstract ....................................................................................... 261 I. Introduction ............................................................................. 262 II. The Nature of the Maltese Mixed Legal System.................... 263 III. The Nine Periods of Maltese Legal History ......................... 265 A. Roman Malta (218 B.C.-870) .............................................266 B. Arab Malta (870-1090)........................................................267 C. Norman Malta (1090-1530) ................................................268 D. Hospitallers Malta (1530-1798) ..........................................269 E. French Malta (1798-1800) ...................................................270 F. British Malta (1800-1964) ...................................................271 G.
    [Show full text]
  • FIGHTING CORRUPTION Incriminations
    FIGHTING CORRUPTION Incriminations by Mr Roderick MACAULEY Criminal law adviser at the Ministry of Justice of the United Kingdom Thematic Review of GRECO’s Third Evaluation Round For further information, GRECO Secretariat Directorate General I - Human Rights and Rule of Law Council of Europe F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex Tel.: + 33 (0)3 88 41 30 43 Fax: + 33 (0)3 88 41 39 55 www.coe.int/greco www.coe.int PREMS 67012 FIGHTING CORRUPTION Incriminations by Mr Roderick MACAULEY Criminal Law adviser at the Ministry of Justice of the United Kingdom Thematic review of GRECO’s Third Evaluation Round Contents Introduction ........................................................ 5 General themes and observations ...................... 9 Specific Themes ................................................ 20 Public/private distinctions ..................................... 20 Public Official ...................................................... 20 Exercise of functions ............................................ 23 Autonomous offences ........................................... 26 Elemental Deficiencies and Consistency .................. 28 Undue advantage ................................................ 31 Private Sector ..................................................... 35 Trading in influence .............................................. 39 Bribery of foreign and international actors ............... 43 ETS No. 191 (Jurors and Arbitrators) ...................... 45 Extra-territorial jurisdiction ................................... 47 Sanctions ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Spine for Bulletin of Medieval Canon Law
    Spine for Bulletin of Medieval Canon Law Top to Bottom Vol. 32 Bulletin of Medieval Canon Law 2015 THE STEPHAN KUTTNER INSTITUTE OF MEDIEVAL CANON LAW MÜNCHEN 2015 BULLETIN OF MEDIEVAL CANON LAW NEW SERIES VOLUME 32 AN ANNUAL REVIEW PUBLISHED BY THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA PRESS FOR THE STEPHAN KUTTNER INSTITUTE OF MEDIEVAL CANON LAW BULLETIN OF MEDIEVAL CANON LAW THE STEPHAN KUTTNER INSTITUTE OF MEDIEVAL CANON LAW MÜNCHEN 2015 BULLETIN OF MEDIEVAL CANON LAW NEW SERIES VOLUME 32 AN ANNUAL REVIEW PUBLISHED BY THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA PRESS FOR THE STEPHAN KUTTNER INSTITUTE OF MEDIEVAL CANON LAW Published annually at the Stephan Kuttner Institute of Medieval Canon Law Editorial correspondence should be addressed to: STEPHAN-KUTTNER INSTITUTE OF MEDIEVAL CANON LAW Professor-Huber-Platz 2 D-80539 München PETER LANDAU, Editor Universität München [email protected] or KENNETH PENNINGTON, Editor The School of Canon Law The Catholic University of America Washington, D.C. 20064 [email protected] Advisory Board PÉTER CARDINAL ERDP PETER LINEHAN Archbishop of Esztergom St. John’s College Budapest Cambridge University JOSÉ MIGUEL VIÉJO-XIMÉNEZ ORAZIO CONDORELLI Universidad de Las Palmas de Università degli Studi Gran Canaria Catania FRANCK ROUMY KNUT WOLFGANG NÖRR Université Panthéon-Assas Universität Tübingen Paris II Inquiries concerning subscriptions or notifications of change of address should be sent to the Bulletin of Medieval Canon Law Subscriptions, PO Box 19966, Baltimore, MD 21211-0966. Notifications can also be sent by email to [email protected] Telephone (410) 516-6987 or 1-800-548-1784 or fax 410-516-3866.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolving International Conflict of Laws by Federal and State Law, 2 Pace Y.B
    Pace International Law Review Volume 2 Issue 1 Article 3 September 1990 Resolving International Conflict of Laws yb Federal and State Law James A.R. Nafziger Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pilr Recommended Citation James A.R. Nafziger, Resolving International Conflict of Laws by Federal and State Law, 2 Pace Y.B. Int'l L. 67 (1990) Available at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pilr/vol2/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace International Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RESOLVING INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT OF LAWS BY FEDERAL AND STATE LAW James A.R. Nafzigert THE ISSUE: A PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS A recurring problem in a federal system is to determine the applicability of state law in international cases before civil courts. In the United States this problem arises in both state courts and federal courts considering cases under diversity juris- diction. From one viewpoint, rules applicable in domestic cases ought generally to apply in international cases as well. Thus, state law should apply in international cases when it would ordi- narily apply in domestic cases. An important corollary is that federal common law should not displace state law except when federal interests are unusually compelling. This is generally the rule today. A contending argument, however, favors a more fully federalized choice of law to replace state law in both federal and state courts.
    [Show full text]
  • Humans and Animals in the Norse North Atlantic
    Humans and Animals in the Norse North Atlantic Lara M. Hogg This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. School of History, Archaeology and Religion. Cardiff University. 2015 SUMMARY It is a well-established fact that all human societies have coexisted with and are dependent upon animals and it is increasingly recognized that the study of human-animal relationships provides vital insights into past human societies. Still this is yet to be widely embraced in archaeology. This thesis has examined human-animal interdependencies to explore the social identities and structure of society in the Norse North Atlantic. Benefitting from recent research advances in animal studies and the ever increasing volume of archaeological reports from Norse period archaeological excavations the North Atlantic this thesis was able to develop previous scholarship and define directions for future research. The thesis explored the role of animals in human society in the North Atlantic to reveal the complex Norse societies that existed. It revealed through human interdependencies with animals that these societies were far from homogeneous and had their own distinct identities with the individual islands as well as across the North Atlantic. The thesis achieved this by examining several important discrete but interlinked themes. These themes were divided into four chapters that focused on the individual aspects. This included an examination of previous North Atlantic Viking Age scholarship, consideration of human construction and perception of landscape through archaeological excavations, investigation of the role of domestic animals in human social activities, and an exploration of the role of domesticated animals in beliefs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Logical and Legal Bases of the Conflict of Laws
    YALE LAW JOURNAL Vol. XXXIII MARCH, 1924 No. 5 THE LOGICAL AND LEGAL BASES OF THE CONFLICT OF LAWS WALTER WHELER Cook Time was when the students of the physical sciences sought to judge the truth or correctness of any particular statement about a particular physical thing--plant, heavenly body, or case of chemical change-by assuming that they had already in hand "a general truth with which to compare the particular empirical occurrence." The assumption was, as John Dewey, from whom I am quoting, puts it, that the human "mind was already in possession of fixed truths, universal principles, pre- ordained axioms" and that "only by their means could contingent, vary- ing particular events be truly known."' So long as this assumption maintained its hold upon men's minds no real advance in physical science was possible. Modern science really began only when "men trusted themselves to embarking upon the uncertain sea of events and were willing to be instructed by changes in the concrete. Then ante- cedent principles were tentatively employed as methods for conducting observations and experiments, and for organizing special facts: as hypotheses. ' 2 In the field of the physical sciences, therefore, the deduc- tive method of ascertaining the truth about nature has given way to what is called-perhaps with not entire accuracy-the inductive3 method of modern science, in which the so-called "laws of nature" are reached by collecting data, i.e. by observing concrete phenomena, and then forming, by a process of "trial and error," generalizations which are merely useful tools by means of which we describe in mental shorthand 'John Dewey, Human Nature and Conduct (1922) 242.
    [Show full text]
  • Browsing Through Bias: the Library of Congress Classification and Subject Headings for African American Studies and LGBTQIA Studies
    Browsing through Bias: The Library of Congress Classification and Subject Headings for African American Studies and LGBTQIA Studies Sara A. Howard and Steven A. Knowlton Abstract The knowledge organization system prepared by the Library of Con- gress (LC) and widely used in academic libraries has some disadvan- tages for researchers in the fields of African American studies and LGBTQIA studies. The interdisciplinary nature of those fields means that browsing in stacks or shelflists organized by LC Classification requires looking in numerous locations. As well, persistent bias in the language used for subject headings, as well as the hierarchy of clas- sification for books in these fields, continues to “other” the peoples and topics that populate these titles. This paper offers tools to help researchers have a holistic view of applicable titles across library shelves and hopes to become part of a larger conversation regarding social responsibility and diversity in the library community.1 Introduction The neat division of knowledge into tidy silos of scholarly disciplines, each with its own section of a knowledge organization system (KOS), has long characterized the efforts of libraries to arrange their collections of books. The KOS most commonly used in American academic libraries is the Li- brary of Congress Classification (LCC). LCC, developed between 1899 and 1903 by James C. M. Hanson and Charles Martel, is based on the work of Charles Ammi Cutter. Cutter devised his “Expansive Classification” to em- body the universe of human knowledge within twenty-seven classes, while Hanson and Martel eventually settled on twenty (Chan 1999, 6–12). Those classes tend to mirror the names of academic departments then prevail- ing in colleges and universities (e.g., Philosophy, History, Medicine, and Agriculture).
    [Show full text]
  • Edwin Busuttil*
    - Malta Edwin Busuttil* Malta is a unitary state with a monarchical form The territories of Malta comprise the Island of of government. It came into existence as an Malta, the Island of Gozo, and the other islands of independent state on 21 Sept. 1964, in virtue of the Maltese Archipelago, including the territorial the Malta Independence Act passed by the United waters thereo£ Kingdom Parliament in the same year (1964, c. 86). I. CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM Privy Council" on 2 Sept. 1964 (S.I. 1964 no. I. Nationality 1398). Maltese nationality is unitary, but a citizen of The power of government in Malta is vested in Malta, by virtue of his Maltese citizenship, also the Head of State and Parliament. In this Malta has the common status of a Commonwealth follows the United Kingdom pattern of parlia­ citizen in common with the citizens of other mentary democracy. countries in the British Commonwealth. In Malta the Constitution is supreme and the Maltese citizenship is acquired by birth or de­ Constitutional Court is empowered to decide on scent, or by registration or naturalization under the constitutionality of legislation. certain conditions. It may be lost by voluntary The machinery for amending the Constitution renunciation, by automatic cessation in the event is somewhat involved, for many provisions of the of dual nationality, or by deprivation by the state Constitution are entrenched. Entrenchment takes in certain circumstances where citizenship was two forms. One group of entrenched sections can originally acquired by registration or naturaliza­ only be amended if an amending Bill is passed by tion (Canst.
    [Show full text]