Hazel Dormouse Reintroduction Sites Report 2019
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Hazel Dormouse Reintroduction Sites Report 2019 Report by Ian White Dormouse Officer PTES July 2019 Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Format of report .................................................................................................................................... 9 1. Brampton Woods, Cambridgeshire ............................................................................................. 14 2. Treswell Wood, Nottinghamshire ................................................................................................ 19 3. Stockton Dingle, Cheshire ............................................................................................................ 23 4. Linford Wood, Buckinghamshire ................................................................................................. 29 5. Bubbenhall, Warwickshire ........................................................................................................... 37 6. Rievaulx, North Yorkshire ............................................................................................................ 41 7. Priestley Wood, Suffolk ................................................................................................................ 45 8. Maulden Wood, Bedfordshire ..................................................................................................... 49 9. Bedford Purlieus, Bedfordshire.................................................................................................... 54 10. Hamps Valley, Staffordshire...................................................................................................... 58 11. Chambers Farm, Lincolnshire ................................................................................................... 62 12. Leashaw Wood, Derbyshire ...................................................................................................... 68 13. Heslett and Peter Woods, North Yorkshire .............................................................................. 72 14. Monsal Dale, Derbyshire ........................................................................................................... 76 15. Bradfield Wood, Suffolk ............................................................................................................ 81 16. Freeholders Wood, North Yorkshire ......................................................................................... 84 17. Windmill Naps, Warwickshire ................................................................................................... 89 18. Alne Wood, Warwickshire ........................................................................................................ 93 19. Treswell Wood, Nottinghamshire ............................................................................................. 97 20. Eaton Wood, Nottinghamshire ............................................................................................... 102 21. Gamston Wood, Nottinghamshire .......................................................................................... 106 22. Haw Bank, North Yorkshire ..................................................................................................... 110 23. Wappenbury wood, Warwickshire ......................................................................................... 114 24. Ryton wood Warwickshire ...................................................................................................... 118 Nottinghamshire Dormouse Project .................................................................................................. 121 The Wensleydale dormouse project .................................................................................................. 123 Dunsmore Living Landscape .............................................................................................................. 127 New Reintroduction sites................................................................................................................... 129 References ......................................................................................................................................... 130 2 | P a g e Appendices ......................................................................................................................................... 131 Appendix A: Reintroduction site summary ................................................................................... 131 Appendix B: Standardised number of dormice recorded by year and by region ......................... 131 Appendix C: Dormouse records at Briddlesford woods, Isle of Wight ......................................... 131 Appendix D: Dormouse data from reintroduction sites ............................................................... 131 3 | P a g e Introduction Hazel dormice Muscardinus avellanarius were made a Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) species in 1995 with the aim of maintaining and enhancing populations where they were known to exist and to reintroduce populations where they were considered extinct. Local Nature Partnerships superseded BAP’s in 2011 but for dormice, the national strategy aims still follows those outlined in the BAP plan. The only notable change being the Annual BAP meeting has now become the National Dormouse Steering Group meeting. People’s Trust for Endangered Species (PTES) is the main charity concerned with hazel dormouse conservation in the UK and some of the work undertaken is funded with assistance from Natural England. There is a long-standing Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the two organisations to achieve the aims of the BAP. The dormouse reintroduction programme started in 1993 as part of the English Nature Species Recovery Programme. The first reintroduction took place in 1993 and a reintroduction takes place approximately every year. The aim of the programme was to restore dormice to counties and areas where they had gone extinct after the range decline over the 20th century had become apparent. The programme uses captive-bred animals supplied by the Common Dormouse Captive Breeders Group. A key member of the CDCBG is Wildwood in Kent which breeds a significant number of dormice for the programme and maintains the Dormouse Stud Book. The Zoological Society of London (ZSL) and Paignton Zoo quarantine the animals following guidance from the Disease Risk Analysis and Health Surveillance (DRAHS) project at ZSL. Post quarantine, the animals are placed in large release cages at a pre-selected woodland in June and these are opened ten days later and the animals freed to disperse into the woodland, although food is supplied until the autumn. PTES manages the programme. Chanin (2014) reviewed the programme and proposed revised ‘measures of success’ criteria for the reintroductions sites which have been adopted by PTES. Chanin’s proposals are shown below and his measure of success as applied to the reintroduction sites in 2015/16 are shown in Table 1. Short-term success: Short-term: did dormice survive the first two winters and breed in the third year (i.e. reach stage 4)? Medium-term success: Medium term: did the dormouse population at the release site remain stable over a period of 5-10 years and disperse from there into adjacent areas outside the original wood? Long-term success: In the long term what is required is for the dormouse population to increase in size and expand its range to reach a level where the probability of long-term survival of the population is high. Determining criteria for this is not easy but one approach would be to aim for the dormouse population to be found in an area of sufficient size to substantially reduce the risk of extinction due to stochastic processes. 4 | P a g e Table 1 The short, medium and long-term success of individual site as assessed by PTES Site NDMP Year Site Short term Medium term Long term Long term success No site No. (assessed 2018/19) (1 – 3 years) (5 to 10 years) 1 84 1993/95 Brampton Wood Yes Stable Dispersing YES 2 144 1994/95 Treswell Wood Yes NO n/a NO 3 78 1996/97 Stockton Dingle Yes Stable Dispersing (?) 4 73 1998 Linford Wood Yes Stable Dispersing YES 5 137 1998 Bubbenhall Wood Yes NO n/a NO 6 132 1999 Rivalux Yes NO n/a NO 7 40 2000 Priestley Yes Stable Dispersing YES 8 167 2001 Maulden Wood Yes Stable Dispersing YES 9 103 2001 Bedford Purlieus Yes Stable Dispersing YES 10 208 2002 Hamps Valley Yes NO n/a NO 11 209 2002 Chambers Wood Yes Stable Dispersing YES 12 234 2003 Leashaw Wood Yes NO n/a NO 13 260 2004 Heslett & Peter Yes Stable Dispersing NO 14 293 2005 Monsal Dale Yes Decline Dispersing(?) 15 317 2006 Bradfield Wood Yes Stable Dispersing YES 16 373 2008 Freeholders Wood Yes Stable Dispersing YES 17 442 2010/11 Windmill Naps Yes Stable NO YES 18 582 2012 Alne Wood NO No n/a NO 19 144 2013 Treswell Wood Yes Yes n/a 20 696 2014 Eaton Wood Yes Yes n/a 21 724 2015 Gamston Wood Yes 22 781 2016 Haw Bank Yes 23 199 2017 Wappenbury Wood Yes 24 712 2018 Ryton Wood Yes 5 | P a g e Also following the Chanin proposals, existing reintroduction sites have been revisited with a view of finding a further suitable woodland in their locality to undertake a reintroduction there. Alternatively, new sites, with at least two woodlands where a dormouse reintroduction can be undertaken, are actively sought. The current long-term aim at reintroduction sites, is to initiate