THE ROOF of the OLYMPIC STADIUM for the 2004 ATHENS OLYMPIC GAMES from Concept to Implementation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Olympic Candidate File of 2016 Rio 5. Comparative Analysis of Olympic
5. Comparative Analysis of Olympic Cities Olympic Candidate File of 2016 Rio Page 47 5. Comparative Analysis of Olympic Cities Olympic Candidate File of 2016 Rio and Transport Strategic Plan Page 48 5. Comparative Analysis of Olympic Cities Olympic Candidate File of 2016 Rio and Transport Strategic Plan Page 49 5. Comparative Analysis of Olympic Cities Summary of Transport Aspect of Olympic Cities Main Olympic Area 89 ㎢ 128 ㎢ 159 ㎢ 155 ㎢ 511 ㎢ Population 4.6 Million 3 Million 7.5 Million 8.2 Million 6.3 Million Main Transit for Rail/Metro Metro/Tram Rail/Metro Metro - 4 BRT Olympic Transport Bus Bus Bus improvement- Metro –line4- Bus Rail-new vehicle Dedicated Lane Some 3 Routes 34 Routes 240km More than 150km Buses 285.7km ITS -Traffic Control -Traffic Control -Traffic Control -Traffic Control -Traffic Control Center, Field Center, Field Center, Field Center, Field Center, Field Equipment and Equipment and Equipment and Equipment and Equipment and systems systems systems systems systems -R$65million -Co-Operation -Co-Operation -Co-Operation -Co-Operation -Co-Operation with Security, with Security, with Security, with Security, with Security Transit and Transit and Transit and Transit and Transit and Olympic Stadium Olympic Stadium Olympic Stadium Olympic Stadium Olympic Management Management Management Management Stadium Management Progress? Page 50 5. Comparative Analysis of Olympic Cities Issues and Key -Size of Olympic Area Rio 2016 has Largest and Widest Main Olympic Area ⇒Minimizing Travel Time with Traffic/Transportation/Transit Mgmt -Core of Venues It will generate traffic of Spectators and Athletes Participants ⇒How to assure the linkage of each Venue and Accommodation -Main Transit Main Transit for Spectators is BRTs connecting with Metro and Rail in Other Cities; Metro or Tram or Rail ⇒ Secure Smooth Traffic On the Road ⇒ Ensure Connection of Different Mode ⇒ Traffic/Transport/Transit Operators Cooperation is most important Page 51 5. -
London 2012 Venues Guide
Olympic Delivery Authority London 2012 venues factfi le July 2012 Venuesguide Contents Introduction 05 Permanent non-competition Horse Guards Parade 58 Setting new standards 84 facilities 32 Hyde Park 59 Accessibility 86 Olympic Park venues 06 Art in the Park 34 Lord’s Cricket Ground 60 Diversity 87 Olympic Park 08 Connections 36 The Mall 61 Businesses 88 Olympic Park by numbers 10 Energy Centre 38 North Greenwich Arena 62 Funding 90 Olympic Park map 12 Legacy 92 International Broadcast The Royal Artillery Aquatics Centre 14 Centre/Main Press Centre Barracks 63 Sustainability 94 (IBC/MPC) Complex 40 Basketball Arena 16 Wembley Arena 64 Workforce 96 BMX Track 18 Olympic and Wembley Stadium 65 Venue contractors 98 Copper Box 20 Paralympic Village 42 Wimbledon 66 Eton Manor 22 Parklands 44 Media contacts 103 Olympic Stadium 24 Primary Substation 46 Out of London venues 68 Riverbank Arena 26 Pumping Station 47 Map of out of Velodrome 28 Transport 48 London venues 70 Water Polo Arena 30 Box Hill 72 London venues 50 Brands Hatch 73 Map of London venues 52 Eton Dorney 74 Earls Court 54 Regional Football stadia 76 ExCeL 55 Hadleigh Farm 78 Greenwich Park 56 Lee Valley White Hampton Court Palace 57 Water Centre 80 Weymouth and Portland 82 2 3 Introduction Everyone seems to have their Londoners or fi rst-time favourite bit of London – visitors – to the Olympic whether that is a place they Park, the centrepiece of a know well or a centuries-old transformed corner of our building they have only ever capital. Built on sporting seen on television. -
The Olympic Movement
OLYMPIC LEGACY 2013 “Creating sustainable legacies 1WHAT IS OLYMPIC LEGACY? 5 is a fundamental commitment SPORTING LEGACY 13 2 of the Olympic Movement. 1 3SOCIAL LEGACIES 23 Every city that hosts the 4ENVIRONMENTAL LEGACIES 33 Olympic Games becomes a temporary steward of the 5URBAN LEGACIES 45 Olympic Movement. It is a great 6ECONOMIC LEGACIES 55 responsibility. It is also a great 7CONCLUSION 65 opportunity. Host cities capture worldwide attention. Each has a once-in-a-lifetime chance to showcase the celebration of the human spirit. And each creates a unique set of environmental, social and economic legacies that can change a community, a region, and a nation forever.” Jacques Rogge, IOC President International Olympic Committee Château de Vidy – C.P. 356 – CH-1007 Lausanne / Switzerland Tel. +41 21 621 61 11 – Fax +41 21 621 62 16 www.olympic.org Published by the International Olympic Committee – March 2013 All rights reserved Printing by Didwedo S.à.r.l., Lausanne, Switzerland Printed in Switzerland 2 3 4 WHAT IS OLYMPIC LEGACY? 1 A LASTING LEGACY The Olympic Games have the power to deliver lasting benefits which 6 can considerably change a community, its image and its infrastructure. 7 As one of the world’s largest sporting events, the Games can be a tremendous catalyst for change in a host city with the potential to create far more than just good memories once the final medals have been awarded. Each edition of the Olympic Games also provides significant legacies for the Olympic Movement as a whole, helping to spread the Olympic values around the world. -
The Impact of the 2004 Olympic Games on the Greek Economy 3
Ι∆ΡΥΜΑ ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΩΝ & ΒΙΟΜΗΧΑΝΙΚΩΝ ΕΡΕΥΝΩΝ FOUNDATION FOR ECONOMIC & INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH 11 Tsami Karatassou, 117 42 Athens, Greece, Tel.: +30 210-9211 200-10, Fax: +30210-9233 977 The impact of the 2004 Olympic Games on the Greek economy January 2015 2 The research for this study was conducted by N. Zonzilos, E. Demian, E. Papadakis, N. Paratsiokas and S. Danchev, under the supervision of the Director General of IOBE, Professor N. Vettas. The researchers would like to thank C. Katsiardis for his research assistance and all the individuals who offered their assistance with data and insight on the Games. IOBE would like to thank Gianna Angelopoulos-Daskalaki for the financial support of this study. The judgments on policy issues and the proposals contained in this study express the opinions of the researchers and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the members or the management of IOBE. The Foundation for Economic & Industrial Research (IOBE) is a private, non-profit, public-benefit research organisation. It was established in 1975 with the dual purpose of promoting research on current problems and prospects of the Greek economy and its sectors and of generating reliable information, analysis and proposals for action that can be of high value in economic policy making. ISBN 978-960-7536-61-7 Copyright 2015 Foundation for Economic & Industrial Research This study may not be reproduced in any form or for any purpose without the prior knowledge and consent of the publisher. Foundation for Economic and Industrial Research (IOBE) 11, Tsami Karatassou St, 117 42 Athens, Tel. (+30210 9211200-10), Fax:(+30210 9233977) E-mail: [email protected] – URL: http://www.iobe.gr Foundation for Economic & Industrial Research IOBE The impact of the 2004 Olympic Games on the Greek economy 3 FOREWORD Without a doubt, the 2004 Olympic Games in Athens and in the other four Olympic cities had a multiple impact on the Greek economy, on many levels and at various time periods. -
Pag 01Ok.Qxd 20/06/2014 20:38 Pægina 1 EL CULTURAL1 Euro
pag 01ok.qxd 20/06/2014 20:38 PÆgina 1 EL CULTURAL1 Euro. Venta conjunta e inseparable con El Mundo, y en librerías especializadas 27 de junio - 3 de julio de 2014 www.elcultural.es Richard Hamilton El último autorretrato La distopía conquista la literatura Mérida absuelve a Salomé Paco Azorín abre el festival con una impactante revisión de la ópera de Strauss Pag 03.qxd 20/06/2014 21:13 PÆgina 3 PRIMERA PALABRA LUIS MARÍA ANSON de la Real Academia Española Felipe VI y la cultura elipe II, Felipe III y Fe- Graciano García, con saga- Se divirtió hablando con Pedro centenares de representantes lipe IV vivieron el Siglo de cidad impagable, situó a Don Almodóvar, el gran genio del de la cultura española, iberoa- FOro de la cultura españo- Felipe en la plataforma del Pre- cine español, con Maya Pli- mericana y mundial. la. Conocieron personalmente mio Príncipe de Asturias, lo sétskaya y Tamara Rojo, con Felipe VI no gobierna. o tuvieron noticia cercana de que ha permitido al actual Rey Paco de Lucía y Michael Ha- Pero reina. Y estoy seguro de los más grandes: Cervantes y comprender la significación neke. que alentará al Gobierno a que San Juan de la Cruz, Lope de profunda de la cultura en las le- Y el mundo de la Comuni- dedique sus mejores esfuerzos Vega y Santa Teresa, Veláz- tras, las artes plásticas, la mú- cación. Recuerdo a Indro Mon- al mundo de la cultura en el quez y Calderón, Fray Luis de sica, el cine, la ciencia… tanelli, mi inolvidado, mi gran que España ocupa lugar de re- León y Gracián, Góngora y He tenido la suerte de sen- amigo, departiendo con Don lieve internacional. -
Example Case Study: Milwaukee Art Museum
Example Case Study: Milwaukee Art Museum ARCH 631: Structural Systems Prof. Anne Nichols 2004 1 Contents Overview (Introduction) 1 The Milwaukee Art Museum (Background) 1 The Architect (Background) 2 The Quadracci Pavilion (Body) 4 Design Concept 4 Building Layout 4 Structural Features 8 Building Components and System 9 Burke Brise-Soleil 13 Pedestrian Bridge 14 Loading Summary 15 Gravity Loads 16 Lateral Load Resistance 20 Foundation and Soil 22 Summary Bibliography (References) i Overview On May 4, 2001, a much-anticipated addition to the Milwaukee Art Museum first opened its doors to the public. The $125-million-dollar project, designed by architect Santiago Calatrava, became an icon for the museum and the city of Milwaukee, Wisconsin even before its completion. This report presents a case study of the project. Background information regarding the architectural context for the addition will be provided, as well as a synopsis of the architect’s mastery of structural design. A number of unique elements of the building will be discussed in detail. In addition, the building’s complex structural design will be reviewed through component and system evaluation, diagrams, and simplified computer-based structural analysis. The Milwaukee Art Museum The Milwaukee Art Museum (MAM) traces its beginnings to two institutions, the Layton Art Gallery, established in 1888, and the Milwaukee Art Institute, which was established in 1918. In 1957 the groups joined together, forming the private, nonprofit Milwaukee Art Center, now known as the Milwaukee Art Museum. At this time, the Center moved to its present location on the Milwaukee waterfront Finnish architect Eero Saarinen, known for his St. -
The-Piano-Teaching-Legacy-Of-Solomon-Mikowsky.Pdf
! " #$ % $%& $ '()*) & + & ! ! ' ,'* - .& " ' + ! / 0 # 1 2 3 0 ! 1 2 45 3 678 9 , :$, /; !! < <4 $ ! !! 6=>= < # * - / $ ? ?; ! " # $ !% ! & $ ' ' ($ ' # % %) %* % ' $ ' + " % & ' !# $, ( $ - . ! "- ( % . % % % % $ $ $ - - - - // $$$ 0 1"1"#23." 4& )*5/ +) * !6 !& 7!8%779:9& % ) - 2 ; ! * & < "-$=/-%# & # % %:>9? /- @:>9A4& )*5/ +) "3 " & :>9A 1 The Piano Teaching Legacy of Solomon Mikowsky by Kookhee Hong New York City, NY 2013 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface by Koohe Hong .......................................................3 Endorsements .......................................................................3 Comments ............................................................................5 Part I: Biography ................................................................12 Part II: Pedagogy................................................................71 Part III: Appendices .........................................................148 1. Student Tributes ....................................................149 2. Student Statements ................................................176 -
The Australia Stadium
THE AUSTRALIA STADIUM SYDNEY’S OLYMPIC STADIUM HAS BEEN THE LARGEST Stadium Australia FACILITY IN THE HISTORY OF THE GAMES. TODAY, FOLLOWING A RE-STRUCTURING, IT IS THE ONLY ONE IN THE Capacity: 83,500, 81,500 (Oval) WORLD THAT CAN HOST FIVE DIFFERENT SPORTS AND STILL Opening: March 1999 IS AN EXAMPLE OF HOW HIGH QUALITY DESIGN AND Capacity during the Olympics: 110,000 RESPECT FOR THE ENVIRONMENT CAN HAPPILY CO-EXIST. Cost: $ 690 million Australian Start of work construction: September 1996 Restructuring: From October 2001 to October 2003 Owner: Stadium Australia Group Project: Populous (Bligh Lobb Sports Architects) Hosted sports: Australian Rules football, rugby 13, rugby 15, football, cricket (Australia) THE LARGEST OLYMPIC STADIUM TO DATE Stadium Australia was built to host the 2000 Sydney Olympic and Paralympic Games. The facility is located in Sydney’s suburb of Homebush, in the middle of the Olympic Park of the Australian city. When it was inaugurated, due to its 110,000 seats, it immediately conquered the “largest Olympic stadium in the world” title and at the same time it is the largest in Australia. The structure was designed and built with the intent of respecting demanding environmental conditions: compared to other Olympic stadiums (Athens and Beijing), as an example, less steel was used. The construction was started in September 1996 and completed just two and a half years later: on March 6, 1999, Sydney’s Olympic Stadium saw its first sport event: two rugby13 matches watched by 104,583 spectators. From October 2001 to October 2003, Stadium Australia was refurbished to make it the only stadium in the world capable of hosting five different professional sports: Rugby13 league, Rugby15 (Union), Australian Football, Soccer and Cricket. -
Jonathan C. Got Berlin Perspectives on Architecture 1 Olympiastadion
Jonathan C. Got Berlin Perspectives on Architecture Olympiastadion – Germania and Beyond My personal interest with the Olymiastadion began the first week I arrived in Berlin. Having only heard about Adolf Hitler’s plans for a European Capital from documentaries and seen pictures of Jesse Owen’s legendary victories in the ill-timed 1936 Summer Olympics, I decided to make a visit myself. As soon as I saw the heavy stone colonnade from the car park I knew it could only have been built for one purpose – propaganda for the Third Reich beyond Germania. Remodelled for the 1936 Summer Olympics in Berlin by Hitler’s favorite architects Werner March (whose father, Otto March, designed the original 1913 stadium) and Albert Speer, the Olympiastadion was a symbol of power for the National Socialist party and an opportunity to present propaganda in the form of architecture. Being the westernmost structure on Hitler’s ‘capital city of the world’, the stadium was designed to present the then National Socialist Germany to the rest of the world as a power to be reckoned with. Any visitor to the stadium doesn’t only see the gigantic stadium, but also experiences the whole Olympic complex. Visitors would arrive at a 10-platform S-Bahn station able to serve at high frequencies for large events and then walk several hundred meters with a clear view of the huge imposing stone stadium as soon as visitors reached the car park. Though some might argue that neither the U- nor S-Bahn stations named after the stadium provided convenient access to the sports grounds, one has to consider the scale of the event. -
The Beijing National Stadium
THE BEIJING NATIONAL STADIUM THERE ARE MANY REASONS TO REMEMBER THE 2008 Area: 254,600 square meters OLYMPIC GAMES, AND ONE OF THESE IS UNDOUBTEDLY THE Track Provider: Mondo Spa IMPRESSIVE EVENTS BROADCASTED TO AUDIENCES Height: 69,2 meters AROUND THE WORLD FROM THE OLYMPIC STADIUM IN Start date of construction: December 24, 2003 BEIJING, A BUILDING UNIVERSALLY DUBBED WITH THE Cost of project: $423 million NICKNAME "THE BIRD'S NEST". Structural engineering: Arup Number of workers: 17,000 Steel used: 44,000 tons Capacity: 80,000/91,000 (2008 Olympic games) Olympic Editions (China) AN ARCHITECTURAL MIRACLE The reason for the name immediately strikes the eye : an intricate system of ties and a complex steel structure makes the building look like a huge nest, that can hold up to 91,000 spectators and has one of the world's fastest athletic tracks. The history of this architectural miracle began with an annoucement issued on December 19, 2002. On March 26, 2003 a team of international experts examined the proposals coming from all over the world. In April, the winner was announced: the swiss Herzog & De Meuron firm, which along with Arup Sport and the China Architecture Design & Research Group would deliver the full project in December 2007. Everything was perfect, up to the last details. On June 28, 2008 a grand opening ceremony drew the curtain on this colossal stage that would for about a month put the Chinese dragon under the worlds’ astonished eyes. THE MYTH Creating a building of this magnitude was not an easy task. In China everything is a symbol and a reference to the past and the National Stadium in Beijing was no different. -
The Structural Behavior of a Counter Weighted Cable Stayed Bridge
The Structural Behavior of A Counter Weighted Cable Stayed Bridge by Gregory A. Otto B. Eng. Civil Engineering (2000) Cooper Union B. Architecture (1995) Kansas State University Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Masters of Engineering in Civil and Environmental Engineering. at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 2001 @2001 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. A Signature of Author .............................................. Department of Civil and Environ ntal Engineering il 21 May 2001 C ertified by ................................... ,o / Jerome J. Connor Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering / Thesis Supervisor Accepted by ........................ I /X Oral Buyukozturk Chairman, Departmental Committee on Graduate Studies MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY JUL 9 20Z BARKER LIBRARIES The Structural Behavior of A Counter Weighted Cable Stayed Bridge by Gregory A. Otto Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering on 21 May, 2000 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Engineering in Civil and Environmental engineering. ABSTRACT Santiago Calatrava - when he introduced the counter weight cable stayed bridge typology - opened the door to the possibility of designing bridges for pursuits other than the purely utilitarian. This document explores the potential for variation within the typology by reviewing the historical development of the cable stayed bridge, the elements of the structural system, and the variation possible within these elements. A design strategy is then established for the counter weight cable stayed bridge. Using a proposal for Boston, Massachusetts (Charles River Crossing), a counter weight cable stayed bridge is systematically assessed on a component by component basis. -
A Case Study of Santiago Calatrava's Architectural Designs
European International Journal of Science and Technology ISSN: 2304-9693 www.eijst.org.uk AESTHETICS OF STRUCTURAL FUNCTIONALISM: A CASE STUDY OF SANTIAGO CALATRAVA’S ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNS OMALE Reuben Peters 1 and Momoh Victor 2 1,2 Department of Architecture, School of Environmental Technology, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Ondo state, Nigeria Email: [email protected] 1 and [email protected] 2 Abstract After building projects have been completed and inhabited by either Clients or Users of the buildings, such buildings begin to exist on their own with little or no information about the designer who conceived the idea behind the designs. This phenomenon leaves interested lay public and young architects curious about whom the designer is. This study aims at showcasing the design style of famous architect, Santiago Calatrava – a Spanish born architect of the post-modernist movement, whose architectural projects can best be described as awesome and breathtaking masterpieces. He is a neofuturist architect, a structural engineer, a sculptor and a painter. This work also studied his early life as a young architect and his inspirations for innovation and creativity which was motivated by his love for biology and anatomy. Lessons where drawn from the life and times of this great architect with many laurels, among which is the AIA gold medal and the IstructE gold medal. Some of his popular projects include; Milwaukee art museum, Wisconsin, U.S.A, the Queen Sofia palace for the arts, auditorio de Tenerife in Canary, Spain and the turning torso building in Malmo, Sweden, just to mention a few among many.