DOCSLIB.ORG

LOP #11 Oregon Wilderness

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LOP #11 Oregon Wilderness Larch Occasional Paper #11 February 2012 The National Wilderness Preservation System in Oregon: Making It Bigger and Better by Andy Kerr1 Abstract Compared to its four adjacent neighbors, Oregon has the smallest percentage of its lands designated as units of the National Wilderness Preservation System. While the average of the areas of the five states protected as wilderness is more than 9 percent, in Oregon less than 4 percent of the land is so protected. Oregon has 47 wilderness areas totaling 2,457,473 acres. Additional potential wilderness areas (a.k.a. roadless areas) in Oregon total more than 12 million acres, with approximately 61 percent of that area being generally tree-free (in the Oregon High Desert and other desert areas considered part of the sagebrush steppe) and the remainder generally forested. Congress should expeditiously expand the National Wilderness System in Oregon. Introduction Congress enacted the Wilderness Act, which established the National Wilderness Preservation System, in 1964: In order to assure that an increasing population, accompanied by expanding settlement and growing mechanization, does not occupy and modify all areas within the United States and its possessions, leaving no lands designated for preservation and protection in their natural condition, it is hereby declared to be the policy of the Congress to secure for the American people of present and future generations the benefits of an enduring resource of wilderness.2 Those areas of the National Forest System that had already been designated administratively by the Forest Service as either “wilderness” or “wild” areas were immediately included in the 1 Andy Kerr ([email protected]) is czar of The Larch Company (www.andykerr.net), which has offices in Ashland, Oregon, and Washington, DC. 2 Wilderness Act (P.L. 88-577), 16 U.S.C. 1131(a). The National Wilderness Preservation System in Oregon: Making It Bigger and Better Larch Occasional Paper #11 1 system.3 Over the years, Congress has seen fit to expand many of those original areas and to include additional areas as designated wilderness. This paper compares the percentage of Oregon designated as wilderness to its adjacent neighbors; summarizes Oregon wilderness areas by name, federal administrative unit, size, and other facts; and summarizes the amount of de facto wildlands in Oregon that could be added to the National Wilderness Preservation System. Wilderness is an anchor to windward. Knowing it is there, we can also know we are still a rich nation, tending to our resources as we should — not a people in despair searching every last nook and cranny of our land for a board of lumber, a barrel of oil, a blade of grass, or a tank of water. — Senator Clinton Anderson (D-NM) (principal sponsor of the first Wilderness Act) Figure 1. As of January 2009, Shellrock Lake is now safely within the Roaring River Wilderness on the Mount Hood National Forest. George Wuerthner Area of Oregon Wilderness Versus Wilderness in Adjacent States It’s rather embarrassing. California, sure. Washington, okay. But Nevada? Even Idaho!? Compared to its closest neighbors, Oregon has the smallest percentage of its lands designated as units of the National Wilderness Preservation System (see Table 1). 3 Ibid., 1131–1136. The National Wilderness Preservation System in Oregon: Making It Bigger and Better Larch Occasional Paper #11 2 Table 1. Comparison of the Area of Designated Wilderness in Oregon and Adjacent States4 State Total Land Wilderness Percentage Total Oregon Total Additional Area in Acres of Land Wilderness Acres Oregon Wilderness Acres Area Needed to Achieve Acres Needed to Reach Designated Percentage Parity Percentage Parity with as with Other States Other States Wilderness OREGON 62,163,840 2,457,473 3.95% Idaho 53,484,800 4,522,779 8.46% 5,256,696 2,799,223 California 104,765,440 15,000,292 14.32% 8,900,605 6,443,132 Washington 46,784,000 4,423,405 9.45% 5,877,562 3,420,089 Nevada 70,759,040 3,368,796 4.76% 2,959,584 502,111 Average 9.25% 5,748,611 3,291,138 The last column in Table 1 shows how many additional acres of wilderness Congress would need to designate in order for Oregon to achieve percentage parity with each of its neighbors. Fortunately, we have the wildland acres to do it — if we have the political will. I know just where those acres are.5 The West of which I speak is but another name for the Wild; and what I have been preparing to say is, that in Wildness lies the preservation of the World. — Henry David Thoreau Existing Oregon Wilderness Areas Table 2 lists existing Oregon wilderness areas by name, federal administrative unit(s), ecoregion, size, and year of establishment. The Size in Acres column represents the most accurate acreages available. The Notes column contains additional information highlighting the history of an area and/or interesting anomalies, as well as approximate acreage figures reflecting estimates at the time of designation as reference in the applicable statute. Congress enacted legislation pertaining to Oregon wilderness areas between 1964 and 2009: 1964 — Wilderness Act (P.L. 88-577), Sept. 3, 1964 1968 — Mount Jefferson Wilderness, Oregon (Act) (P.L. 90-548), Oct. 2, 1968 1970 — Public Lands — Wilderness Areas (Act) (P.L. 91-504), Oct. 23, 1970 1972 — Minam River Canyon Wilderness, Oregon (Act) (P.L. 92-521), Oct. 21, 1972 1975 — Hells Canyon National Recreation Area Act (P.L. 94-199), Dec. 31, 1975 1978a — Endangered American Wilderness Area Act (P.L. 95-237) (incorporated Oregon Omnibus Wilderness Act of 1978), Feb. 28, 1978 1978b — Indian Peaks Wilderness Area, The Arapaho National Recreation Area and the Oregon Islands Wilderness Area Act (P.L. 95-450), Oct. 11, 1978 1984 — Oregon Wilderness Act (P.L. 98-328), June 26, 1984 1996 — Oregon Resource Conservation Act (P.L. 104-208), Sept. 30, 1996; Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act (P.L. 104-333), Nov. 12, 1996.6 2000 — Steens Mountain Cooperative Management and Protection Act (P.L. 106-399), Oct. 30, 2000 2009 — Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (P.L. 111-11), March 30, 2009. 4 Primary sources: Land area of other states, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territories_by_area; wilderness in other states, Wilderness.net (http://www.wilderness.net). 5 See “Additional Resources” at the end for the two books I’ve written on potential wilderness areas in Oregon. 6 Both 1996 laws contain identical language protecting Opal Creek Wilderness. In a rare occurrence, conservationists’ primary and backup legislative strategies both succeeded in Congress (involving attaching the Opal Creek language to two different bills), resulting in the area being “saved” twice. The National Wilderness Preservation System in Oregon: Making It Bigger and Better Larch Occasional Paper #11 3 Table 2. Oregon Wilderness Areas7 Name National Level III Size in Year Notes Forest, BLM Eco- Acres Estab- District, and/ region lished, Ex- or National panded Wildlife Refuge System Badger Mount Hood East 29,090 1984, 2009 Originally designated with Creek National Cascades approximately 25,000 acres. In 2009, Forest Slopes 1,135 acres were added to the core unit and and a 3,004-acre Bonnie Butte Unit was Foothills added. Black Ochoco Blue 13,400 1984 Canyon National Mountains Forest Boulder Umpqua Cascades 19,100 1984 Creek National Forest Bridge Ochoco Blue 5,400 1984 Creek National Mountains Forest Bull-of-the- Mount Hood Cascades 37,607 1984, 2009 Originally designated with Woods National approximately 33,900 acres. In 1996, Forest 7,466 acres on the Willamette National Forest was transferred into the Opal Creek Wilderness upon its establishment. See note for Opal Creek. Approximately 10,180 acres was added in 2009. Clackamas Mount Hood Cascades 9,470 2009 Includes five units: Big Bottom (1,263 National acres), Clackamas Canyon (1,247 acres), Forest Memaloose Lake (1,131 acres), Sisi Butte (3,243 acres), and South Fork Clackamas (2,579 acres) Copper Rogue River– Coast 13,700 2009 Salmon Siskiyou Range National Forest Cummins Siuslaw Coast 9,173 1984 Creek National Range Forest Diamond Deschutes, East 54,185 1964, 1984 Administratively established as a wild Peak Willamette Cascades area on February 5, 1957, at National Slopes approximately 35,440, with 15,700 acres Forests and added later. Foothills Drift Creek Siuslaw Coast 5,798 1984 National Range Forest 7 Additional primary sources include accompanying legislative history including committee reports, and Wilderness.net (http: www.wilderness.net). The National Wilderness Preservation System in Oregon: Making It Bigger and Better Larch Occasional Paper #11 4 Eagle Cap Wallowa- Blue 349,987 1964, 1972, Administratively established as a Whitman Mountains 1984 primitive area in 1930; administratively National designated as wilderness on October 7, Forest 1940, at approximately 216,250 acres. Later, 72,420 and 66,500 acres, respectively, were added. The 1972 addition, while a net gain, also resulted in 7,220 acres previously designated as wilderness being undesignated. The 1984 addition recovered 2,700 acres of the 7,220, thereby allowing Senator Hatfield to claim political credit for saving acres he had previously unsaved. The remaining 4,520 acres originally in the Eagle Cap Wilderness remain eligible for redesignation. Gearhart Fremont- East 22,809 1964, 1984 Administratively established as a wild Mountain Winema Cascades area on November 11, 1943, with National Slopes approximately 18,709 acres. Later, 4,100 Forest and acres added. Foothills Grassy Knob Rogue River– Coast 17,200 1984 Siskiyou Range National Forest Hells Wallowa- Blue 131,133 1975, 1984 Consists of 130,095 acres on the Canyon Whitman Mountains Wallowa-Whitman National Forest and National 1,038 acres on the Vale District of the Forest, Vale BLM.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Forests of Eastern Oregon: an Overview Sally Campbell, Dave Azuma, and Dale Weyermann
    Forests of Eastern Oregon: An Overview Sally Campbell, Dave Azuma, and Dale Weyermann United States Forest Pacific Northwest General Tecnical Report Department of Service Research Station PNW-GTR-578 Agriculture April 2003 Revised 2004 Joseph area, eastern Oregon. Photo by Tom Iraci Authors Sally Campbell is a biological scientist, Dave Azuma is a research forester, and Dale Weyermann is geographic information system manager, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 620 SW Main, Portland, OR 97205. Cover: Aspen, Umatilla National Forest. Photo by Tom Iraci Forests of Eastern Oregon: An Overview Sally Campbell, Dave Azuma, and Dale Weyermann U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Portland, OR April 2003 State Forester’s Welcome Dear Reader: The Oregon Department of Forestry and the USDA Forest Service invite you to read this overview of eastern Oregon forests, which provides highlights from recent forest inventories.This publication has been made possible by the USDA Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) Program, with support from the Oregon Department of Forestry. This report was developed from data gathered by the FIA in eastern Oregon’s forests in 1998 and 1999, and has been supplemented by inventories from Oregon’s national forests between 1993 and 1996.This report and other analyses of FIA inventory data will be extremely useful as we evaluate fire management strategies, opportunities for improving rural economies, and other elements of forest management in eastern Oregon.We greatly appreciate FIA’s willingness to work with the researchers, analysts, policymakers, and the general public to collect, analyze, and distrib- ute information about Oregon’s forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Wolverines in Northeast Oregon – 2011
    Monitoring Wolverines in Northeast Oregon – 2011 Submitted by The Wolverine Foundation, Inc. Title: Monitoring Wolverine in Northeast Oregon – 2011 Authors: Audrey J. Magoun, Patrick Valkenburg, Clinton D. Long, and Judy K. Long Funding and Logistical Support: Dale Pedersen James Short Marsha O’Dell National Park Service Norcross Wildlife Foundation Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Seattle Foundation The Wolverine Foundation, Inc. U.S. Forest Service Wildlife Conservation Society Special thanks to all those individuals who provided observations of wolverines in the Wallowa- Whitman National Forest and other areas in Oregon. We also thank Tim Hiller, Mark Penninger, and Glenn McDonald for their assistance in the field work. This document should be cited as: Magoun, A. J., P. Valkenburg, C. D. Long, and J. K. Long. 2011. Monitoring wolverines in northeast Oregon – 2011. Final Report. The Wolverine Foundation, Inc., Kuna, Idaho, USA. 2 INTRODUCTION The Oregon Conservation Strategy lists “species data gaps” and “research and monitoring needs” for some species where basic information on occurrence and habitat associations are not known (ODFW 2006; pages 367-368). For the Blue Mountains, East Cascades, and West Cascades Ecoregions of Oregon, the Strategy lists wolverine as a species for which status is unknown but habitat may be suitable to support wolverines. ODFW lists the wolverine as Threatened in Oregon and the USFWS has recently placed the species on the candidate list under the federal Endangered Species Act. Wolverine range in the contiguous United States had contracted substantially by the mid-1900s, probably because of high levels of human-caused mortality and very low immigration rates (Aubry et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Freshwater Resources on Mount Hood National Forest Recommendations for Policy Changes
    PROTECTING FRESHWATER RESOURCES ON MOUNT HOOD NATIONAL FOREST RECOMMENDATIONS FOR POLICY CHANGES Produced by PACIFIC RIVERS COUNCIL Protecting Freshwater Resources on Mount Hood National Forest Pacific Rivers Council January 2013 Fisherman on the Salmon River Acknowledgements This report was produced by John Persell, in partnership with Bark and made possible by funding from The Bullitt Foundation and The Wilburforce Foundation. Pacific Rivers Council thanks the following for providing relevant data and literature, reviewing drafts of this paper, offering important discussions of issues, and otherwise supporting this project. Alex P. Brown, Bark Dale A. McCullough, Ph.D. Susan Jane Brown Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fisheries Commission Western Environmental Law Center G. Wayne Minshall, Ph.D. Lori Ann Burd, J.D. Professor Emeritus, Idaho State University Dennis Chaney, Friends of Mount Hood Lisa Moscinski, Gifford Pinchot Task Force Matthew Clark Thatch Moyle Patrick Davis Jonathan J. Rhodes, Planeto Azul Hydrology Rock Creek District Improvement Company Amelia Schlusser Richard Fitzgerald Pacific Rivers Council 2011 Legal Intern Pacific Rivers Council 2012 Legal Intern Olivia Schmidt, Bark Chris A. Frissell, Ph.D. Mary Scurlock, J.D. Doug Heiken, Oregon Wild Kimberly Swan Courtney Johnson, Crag Law Center Clackamas River Water Providers Clair Klock Steve Whitney, The Bullitt Foundation Klock Farm, Corbett, Oregon Thomas Wolf, Oregon Council Trout Unlimited Bronwen Wright, J.D. Pacific Rivers Council 317 SW Alder Street, Suite 900 Portland, OR 97204 503.228.3555 | 503.228.3556 fax [email protected] pacificrivers.org Protecting Freshwater Resources on Mt. Hood National Forest: 2 Recommendations for Policy Change Table of Contents Executive Summary iii Part One: Introduction—An Urban Forest 1 Part Two: Watersheds of Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Wolverines in Northeast Oregon
    Monitoring Wolverines in Northeast Oregon January 2011 – December 2012 Final Report Authors: Audrey J. Magoun Patrick Valkenburg Clinton D. Long Judy K. Long Submitted to: The Wolverine Foundation, Inc. February 2013 Cite as: A. J. Magoun, P. Valkenburg, C. D. Long, and J. K. Long. 2013. Monitoring wolverines in northeast Oregon. January 2011 – December 2012. Final Report. The Wolverine Foundation, Inc., Kuna, Idaho. [http://wolverinefoundation.org/] Copies of this report are available from: The Wolverine Foundation, Inc. [http://wolverinefoundation.org/] Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife [http://www.dfw.state.or.us/conservationstrategy/publications.asp] Oregon Wildlife Heritage Foundation [http://www.owhf.org/] U. S. Forest Service [http://www.fs.usda.gov/land/wallowa-whitman/landmanagement] Major Funding and Logistical Support The Wolverine Foundation, Inc. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Oregon Wildlife Heritage Foundation U. S. Forest Service U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Wolverine Discovery Center Norcross Wildlife Foundation Seattle Foundation Wildlife Conservation Society National Park Service 2 Special thanks to everyone who provided contributions, assistance, and observations of wolverines in the Wallowa-Whitman National Forest and other areas in Oregon. We appreciate all the help and interest of the staffs of the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Oregon Wildlife Heritage Foundation, U. S. Forest Service, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Wildlife Conservation Society, and the National Park Service. We also thank the following individuals for their assistance with the field work: Jim Akenson, Holly Akenson, Malin Aronsson, Norma Biggar, Ken Bronec, Steve Bronson, Roblyn Brown, Vic Coggins, Alex Coutant, Cliff Crego, Leonard Erickson, Bjorn Hansen, Mike Hansen, Hans Hayden, Tim Hiller, Janet Hohmann, Pat Matthews, David McCullough, Glenn McDonald, Jamie McFadden, Kendrick Moholt, Mark Penninger, Jens Persson, Lynne Price, Brian Ratliff, Jamie Ratliff, John Stephenson, John Wyanens, Rebecca Watters, Russ Westlake, and Jeff Yanke.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bill to Designate Certain National Forest System Lands in the State of Oregon for Inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System and for Other Purposes
    97 H.R.7340 Title: A bill to designate certain National Forest System lands in the State of Oregon for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System and for other purposes. Sponsor: Rep Weaver, James H. [OR-4] (introduced 12/1/1982) Cosponsors (2) Latest Major Action: 12/15/1982 Failed of passage/not agreed to in House. Status: Failed to Receive 2/3's Vote to Suspend and Pass by Yea-Nay Vote: 247 - 141 (Record Vote No: 454). SUMMARY AS OF: 12/9/1982--Reported to House amended, Part I. (There is 1 other summary) (Reported to House from the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs with amendment, H.Rept. 97-951 (Part I)) Oregon Wilderness Act of 1982 - Designates as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System the following lands in the State of Oregon: (1) the Columbia Gorge Wilderness in the Mount Hood National Forest; (2) the Salmon-Huckleberry Wilderness in the Mount Hood National Forest; (3) the Badger Creek Wilderness in the Mount Hood National Forest; (4) the Hidden Wilderness in the Mount Hood and Willamette National Forests; (5) the Middle Santiam Wilderness in the Willamette National Forest; (6) the Rock Creek Wilderness in the Siuslaw National Forest; (7) the Cummins Creek Wilderness in the Siuslaw National Forest; (8) the Boulder Creek Wilderness in the Umpqua National Forest; (9) the Rogue-Umpqua Divide Wilderness in the Umpqua and Rogue River National Forests; (10) the Grassy Knob Wilderness in and adjacent to the Siskiyou National Forest; (11) the Red Buttes Wilderness in and adjacent to the Siskiyou
    [Show full text]
  • Hike & Stand up Paddleboard Oregon's Alps
    Hike & Stand Up Paddleboard Oregon’s Alps Due to the many variables of outdoor trips, it's impossible to describe exactly what the trip will be like but this will give you a sense of what to expect. Questions? Get in touch at: [email protected] About the Location: Nestled in the remote northeastern corner of Oregon, next to Washington state and Idaho, lie the spectacular mountains nicknamed “Oregon’s Swiss Alps.” Very different from the Cascade Mountains, the Wallowa Mountains tower to nearly 10,000 feet and feel similar to the Rockies. Pronounced “Wal-OW-ah,” meaning “fish trap” in the Nez Perce language, this rugged and remote range shoots up around Oregon’s largest natural lake, Wallowa Lake. If you ever watched the 1975 movie, “I Will Fight No More Forever,” this valley was the home of Chief Joseph and his Nez Perce tribe. Now it’s the home of bronze sculptors, loggers, artists, craft beer brewers, and ranchers. Vegetation and weather are similar to that found in the Idaho, Wyoming, and Colorado mountains; August weather is typically dry and sunny early in the day, with potential thunderstorms in the afternoon. Wallowa Lake has an amazing natural setting, tucked in a basin between jagged peaks. This wild corner of the state features some of the most spectacular scenery Oregon has to offer, and you will get to gaze up at glacier-capped mountains from a stand-up paddleboard in the middle of the lake! What to Expect: You will stay in rustic cabins at a camp College Outdoors has rented, eat great food in the dining hall, and have access to showers and flush toilets.
    [Show full text]
  • Heaven in Hell's Canyon
    Northwest Explorer ONDAL ONDAL M M EN EN K K Left: Hiker at the boundary of Hell’s Canyon Wilderness. Right: Approaching Horse Heaven, elevation 8,100 feet on the Seven Devils Loop Trail in Hell’s Canyon Wilderness. June and July are good times to explore Washington’s southeast corner in the Wenaha-Tucannon area and in the nearby Hells Canyon area of Oregon and Idaho. Heaven in Hell’s Canyon Hiking two wilderness areas near Washington’s southeast corner By Ken Mondal finding places to backpack when the high jaw-dropping views. This hike can be country is snowed in. The Imnaha River done comfortably in 3-4 days. Seven Devils Loop in Hell’s is hikable virtually year round. An excellent description of hiking the Canyon is Heavenly On the Idaho side of the recreation Seven Devils Loop can be found in Hik- There is no question that the Grand area is a 215,000-acre wilderness area, ing Idaho by Maughan and Maughan, Canyon is one of the natural wonders which includes the Seven Devils Moun- published by Falcon. For the other hikes of the world. However, if one measures tains. The premier hike within this I would recommend Rich Landers’ 100 from the Snake River to the summit of wilderness is the Seven Devils Loop, a Hikes in the Inland Northwest. 9,393 foot He Devil Peak in the Seven rugged 29-mile round trip offering mag- Devils Mountains, this makes Hells nificent views into Hells Canyon many Choose Forgotten Wenaha- Canyon the deepest canyon in North thousands of feet below and equally Tucannon for Solitude America.
    [Show full text]
  • Or Wilderness-Like Areas, but Instead Declassified Previously Protected Wildlands with High Timber Value
    48 OREGON WILD A Brief Political History of Oregon’s Wilderness Protections Government protection should be thrown around every wild grove and forest on the Although the Forest Service pioneered the concept of wilderness protection in the mountains, as it is around every private orchard, and trees in public parks. To say 1920s and 1930s, by the late 1940s and 1950s, it was methodically undoing whatever nothing of their values as fountains of timber, they are worth infinitely more than all good it had done earlier by declassifying administrative wilderness areas that contained the gardens and parks of town. any commercial timber. —John Muir1 Just prior to the end of its second term, and after receiving over a million public comments in support of protecting national forest roadless areas, the Clinton Administration promulgated a regulation (a.k.a. “the Roadless Rule”) to protect the Inadequacies of Administrative remaining unprotected wildlands (greater than 5,000 acres in size) in the National Forest System from road building and logging. At the time, Clinton’s Forest Service Protections chief Mike Dombeck asked rhetorically: here is “government protection,” and then there is government protection. Mere public ownership — especially if managed by the Bureau of Is it worth one-quarter of 1 percent of our nation’s timber supply or a fraction of a Land Management — affords land little real or permanent protection. fraction of our oil and gas to protect 58.5 million acres of wild and unfragmented land T National forests enjoy somewhat more protection than BLM lands, but in perpetuity?2 to fully protect, conserve and restore federal forests often requires a combination of Wilderness designation and additional appropriate congressional Dombeck’s remarks echoed those of a Forest Service scientist from an earlier era.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 98-328-June 26, 1984
    98 STAT. 272 PUBLIC LAW 98-328-JUNE 26, 1984 Public Law 98-328 98th Congress An Act June 26, 1984 To designate certain national forest system and other lands in the State of Oregon for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System, and for other purposes. [H.R. 1149] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Oregon United States ofAmerica in Congress assembled, That this Act may Wilderness Act be referred to as the "Oregon Wilderness Act of 1984". of 1984. National SEc. 2. (a) The Congress finds that- Wilderness (1) many areas of undeveloped National Forest System land in Preservation the State of Oregon possess outstanding natural characteristics System. which give them high value as wilderness and will, if properly National Forest preserved, contribute as an enduring resource of wilderness for System. the ben~fit of the American people; (2) the Department of Agriculture's second roadless area review and evaluation (RARE II) of National Forest System lands in the State of Oregon and the related congressional review of such lands have identified areas which, on the basis of their landform, ecosystem, associated wildlife, and location, will help to fulfill the National Forest System's share of a quality National Wilderness Preservation System; and (3) the Department of Agriculture's second roadless area review and evaluation of National Forest System lands in the State of Oregon and the related congressional review of such lands have also identified areas which do not possess outstand­ ing wilderness attributes or which possess outstanding energy, mineral, timber, grazing, dispersed recreation and other values and which should not now be designated as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System but should be avail­ able for nonwilderness multiple uses under the land manage­ ment planning process and other applicable laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer Trail Access and Conditions Update
    Summer Trail Access and Conditions Update Updated June 30, 2017 July Fourth Report! Summer Trail Highlights Summer season high use at recreation sites and trails. Fire season in effect. Possessing or discharging of fireworks prohibited on National Forest Lands. Summer trails below 5,800’ elevation are mostly snow free and accessible. Trail clearing (mostly volunteers) in progress on lower/mid elevation trails. Snow lines are rising to 6,000-7-,200 ft. Please avoid using muddy trails. 60-70% of Wilderness trails are blocked by snow! Wilderness permits required. Biking prohibited in Wilderness! Trails near snow lines (approx.6,000-7,000’) are Be aware of weekday (M-F) trail, road likely muddy. Please avoid using muddy trails as and area closures for logging early season use causes erosion and tread damage. operations, south and west of Cascade Higher elevation trails under patchy, sectional to Lks Welcome Station. near solid snow. 70% of PCT under snow. May 15-Sept 15, dog leash requirement in effect on Deschutes River Trails. Northwest Forest Passes required at various trailheads and day use sites. Cascade Lakes Welcome Station and Lava Lands are open 7 days/wk. NW Forest Passes available. Hwy 46 open but June 19-October 31 bridge related construction at Fall Creek and Goose Creek (Sparks Lk area) will have delays. Cultus Lk and Soda Creek campgrounds are closed until further notice. Go prepared with your Ten Essential Trail clearing in progress on snow free trails with Systems. approx. 50-60% of trails are cleared of down trees. Have a safe summer trails season! GENERAL SUMMER TRAIL CONDITIONS AS OF JUNE 30, 2017: Most Deschutes National Forest non-Wilderness summer trails below 6,000’ elevation are snow free and accessible.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Haze Program List of Facilities That Qualified for Four Factor Analysis Based on PSEL Q/D (2017) > 5
    State of Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Regional Haze Program List of Facilities that qualified for four factor analysis based on PSEL Q/d (2017) > 5 Contact: D Pei Wu, PhD; Email: [email protected] Office Address: 700 NE Multnomah St, Ste 600; Portland, OR 97232 PGE Boardman did not receive a letter and does not need to undergo four factor analysis based on closing date in 2020 Additional information is online at the Regional Haze Program homepage: https://www.oregon.gov/deq/aq/Pages/Haze.aspx Actual Emissions (tons per year) PSEL (tons per year) Fac Operating EIS Facility Distance Agency Facility ID Facility Name Permit State Status ID CIA Name (km) NOX PM10 SO2 Q Q/d NOX PM10 SO2 Q(tpy) Q/d EmissYear 25-0016 PGE Boardman TV OR Active 8171111 Mount Hood Wilderness 142.6 1768.12 387.75 3297.87 5454 38.24 5961 1086 9525 16572 116.21 2017 208850 INTERNATIONAL PAPER TV OR Active Three Sisters Wilderness 58.9 724.02 181.39 67.64 973 16.51 1692 750 1521 3963 67.24 05-1849 A Division of Cascades Holding US Inc. TV OR Active 7219311 Mount Hood Wilderness 87.7 244.40 14.53 6.10 265 3.02 1449 738 3400 5587 63.72 2017 01-0029 Ash Grove Cement Company TV OR Active 7219011 Eagle Cap Wilderness 51.9 788.00 140.82 33.10 962 18.54 1778 176 42 1996 38.47 2017 05-2520 Beaver Plant/Port Westward I Plant TV OR Active 7393911 Mount Hood Wilderness 133.3 359.22 62.19 9.85 431 3.24 3776 241 595 4612 34.60 2017 10-0025 Roseburg Forest Products - Dillard TV OR Active 8219211 Kalmiopsis Wilderness 81.8 1006.94 479.24 73.52 1560 19.07 1655 743 110 2508 30.67 2017 04-0004 Georgia Pacific- Wauna Mill TV OR Active 8055711 Mount Hood Wilderness 145.5 1037.66 775.80 539.82 2353 16.18 2139 1077 913 4129 28.38 2017 03-2145 West Linn Paper Company TV OR Active 8417511 Mount Hood Wilderness 53.7 186.13 14.99 2.72 204 3.79 597 82 743 1422 26.46 2017 22-3501 Halsey Pulp Mill TV OR Active 7394911 Three Sisters Wilderness 80.4 352.06 278.81 80.92 712 8.86 687 366 851 1904 23.69 2017 26-1876 Owens-Brockway Glass Container Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Sisters East
    Belknap 126 Disclaimer Crater Black Crater This product is reproduced from information prepared by the USDA, Forest Service or from other suppliers. The Forest Latta Service cannot assure the reliability or suitability of this Crater information for a particular purpose. The data and product accuracy Black may vary due to compilation from various sources, including modeling Crater and interpretation, and may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards.Twin Lava Camp Lake This information may be updated, corrected or otherwise modifiedCraters without notification. For more information contact: Deschutes NF Supervisors Office at 5S4c1o-t3t 83-5300. North Matthieu Mountain Millican Trout Creek Lake Harlow Butte 242 Crater Crater Hand Lake Huckleberry Trailhead Butte The Condon South Matthieu Scott Pass Tenas Lakes Knobs Butte Benson / Tenas Yapoah Lake Trailhead Crater Four in Scott One Cone Fingerboard Obsidian Prairie Two Butte Sims Butte Collier Cone Pole Creek Deer Butte Linton Lake Little Brother Melvin Butte Proxy Falls Chush Falls North Sister Linton Foley Ridge Lake Middle Rainbow Falls Sister Separation Proxy The Lake Point Husband Horse Creek Substitute Park Meadow Point Three Creek South Meadow Sister Three Creek Lake Broken Top Tam McArthur Rim Sphinx Green Butte Rock Lakes Mesa Ball Cayuse Butte The Wife Le Conte Moraine Lake Crater Crater Broken Top Trailhead The House Kaleetan Devils Rock Butte Hill Burnt Top Devils Lake/ Green Lakes/ Crater Ditch Cedar South Sister Soda Creek Swamp Todd Lake Red Hill Sisters Mirror Katsuk Three
    [Show full text]