DOCSLIB.ORG

NCACC 43Rd Annual Conference Denver, Colorado Alphabetical By

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

8/6/2016 Directories NCACC 43rd Annual Conference ­ Denver, Colorado Alphabetical by State members 06­Aug­2016 Directory Search Export Directory Full Name (First Last) Job Title Court/Organization US State/Canadian Province: AK Marilyn May Clerk of the Appellate Courts Alaska Appellate Courts Meredith Montgomery Chief Deputy Clerk Alaska Appellate Courts US State/Canadian Province: AL Scott Mitchell Clerk Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals US State/Canadian Province: AR Arkansas Supreme Court and Arkansas Court of Stacey Pectol Clerk of the Courts Appeals US State/Canadian Province: AZ Janet Johnson Clerk of Court Arizona Supreme Court Jakob Trierweiler Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One Ruth Willingham Clerk of Court AZ Court of Appeals, Div. 1 US State/Canadian Province: CA Melvin Ashmon Senior Deputy Clerk/Staff Attorney Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District Colette Bruggman Assistant Clerk/Administrator Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District Brian Cotta Assistant Administrator Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District Paula Garcia Asst. Clk/Administrator Court of Appeal, 4th Dist., Div. 2 Brandon Henson Assistant Clerk/Administrator Fourth District Court of Appeal, Division One Diana Herbert Clerk/Administrator Court of Appeal, First District Joseph Lane Clerk of the Court CA Court of Appeal, 2nd District https://www.regonline.com/ActiveReports/CustomReports/DirectoryReport.aspx?eventSessionId=c831a2d8bfb3496689321a76587a52d1&rptId=1496372&EventId=dk7KgEL15Sg%3d 1/5 8/6/2016 Directories Kevin Lane Clerk/Administrator Fourth Appellate District Court Administrator and Clerk of the Supreme Frank McGuire Supreme Court of California Court Daniel Potter Clerk Administrator California Court of Appeal, 6th Dist. California Court of Appeal, Sixth Appellate Mariana Sanchez Assistant Clerk/Administrator District US State/Canadian Province: CO Jane Bailey Motions and Jurisidiction Counsel Colorado Court of Appeals Pauline Brock Deputy District Administrator Colorado Appellate Courts Martha Cearley Motions and Jurisidiction Counsel Colorado Court of Appeals Susan Johnson Supervisor, Court of Appeals Clerk's Office Colorado Court of Appeals Alan Loeb Chief Judge Colorado Court of Appeals Colorado Appellate Courts Susan Nevelow Mart Director CU Law Library William A. Wise Law Library Clerk of Court, Colorado Supreme Court and Chris Ryan Colorado Appellate Courts Court of Appeals Cheryl Stevens Staff Assistant, Colorado Supreme Court Colorado Supreme Court Sonya Stromberg Staff Assistant Colorado Supreme Court Rito Vasquez Supervisor Technical Services Colorado Appellate Courts US State/Canadian Province: DC Gregory Block Clerk of the Court/Executive Officer US Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims William DeCicco Clerk of the Court U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces US State/Canadian Province: FL Mark Clayton Chief Deputy Clerk Florida Supreme Court Shannon Hudson Florida Supreme Court Mary Kuenzel Clerk Second District Court of Appeal, Florida Joanne Simmons Clerk of Court 5th District Court of Appeal John Tomasino Clerk of Court Florida Supreme Court Lonn Weissblum Clerk of the Court Fourth District Court of Appeal US State/Canadian Province: ID KAREL LEHRMAN CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK IDAHO SUPREME COURT US State/Canadian Province: IN https://www.regonline.com/ActiveReports/CustomReports/DirectoryReport.aspx?eventSessionId=c831a2d8bfb3496689321a76587a52d1&rptId=1496372&EventId=dk7KgEL15Sg%3d 2/5 8/6/2016 Directories Larry Morris Administrator Court of Appeals of Indiana Indiana Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, and Gregory Pachmayr Tax Court US State/Canadian Province: KS Douglas Shima Clerk of the Kansas Appellate Courts Clerk of the Kansas US State/Canadian Province: KY Susan Clary Clerk, Court Administrator, General Counsel Supreme Court of Kentucky US State/Canadian Province: LA John Olivier Clerk of Court Louisiana Supreme Court Lillian Richie Clerk of Court/JA Louisiana Second Circuit Court of Appeal US State/Canadian Province: MI Larry Royster Chief of Staff/Clerk of Court Michigan Supreme Court US State/Canadian Province: MO Terence Lord Clerk Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District Laura Roy Clerk of Court Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Sandra Skinner Clerk Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District Bill Thompson Clerk Supreme Court of Missouri US State/Canadian Province: MS Muriel Ellis Clerk Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals US State/Canadian Province: MT Rex Renk Deputy Clerk Montana Supreme Court US State/Canadian Province: NC Bryan Boyd Clerk, Supreme Court of North Carolina Supreme Court of North Carolina US State/Canadian Province: ND Penny Miller Clerk North Dakota Supreme Court US State/Canadian Province: NH Eileen Fox Clerk Supreme Court of New Hampshire Timothy Gudas Deputy Clerk New Hampshire Supreme Court US State/Canadian Province: NV Tom Harris Chief Assistant Clerk of Court Nevada Court of Appeals Tracie Lindeman Clerk of Court Supreme Court of Nevada https://www.regonline.com/ActiveReports/CustomReports/DirectoryReport.aspx?eventSessionId=c831a2d8bfb3496689321a76587a52d1&rptId=1496372&EventId=dk7KgEL15Sg%3d 3/5 8/6/2016 Directories US State/Canadian Province: OH Sandra Grosko Clerk of the Court The Supreme Court of Ohio Amy Reitz Chief Deputy Clerk Supreme Court of Ohio US State/Canadian Province: PA Irene Bizzoso Prothonotary Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Kristen Brown Prothonotary The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania US State/Canadian Province: SC Jenny Kitchings Clerk of Court South Carolina Court of Appeals Daniel Shearouse Clerk of Court Supreme Court of South Carolina US State/Canadian Province: TX Debbie Autrey Clerk of the Court 6th Court of Appeals, Texas Kenneth Bier Deputy Clerk Supreme Court of Texas Diane Cuellar Deputy Clerk Court of Criminal Appeals Pamela Estes Clerk of Court Twelfth Court of Appeals Carol Harley Clerk of the Court Ninth Court of Appeals ­ Texas Blake Hawthorne Clerk of the Court Supreme Court of Texas Clarissa Hodges General Counsel Second Court of Appeals Claudia Jenks Chief Deputy Clerk Supreme Court of Texas Lisa Matz Clerk of the Court Fifth Court of Appeals Natalie McDermon Deputy Clerk Supreme Court of Texas Christopher Prine Clerk of Court 1st and 14th Courts of Appeal Dorian Ramirez Clerk Thirteenth Court of Appeals Deana Williamson Deputy Clerk Court of Criminal Appeals Sherry Williamson Clerk 11th Court of Appeals US State/Canadian Province: UT Lisa Collins Clerk of Court Utah Court of Appeals US State/Canadian Province: VA Patricia Harrington Clerk Supreme Court of Virginia Shauna Strickland Senior Court Research Analyst National Center for State Courts https://www.regonline.com/ActiveReports/CustomReports/DirectoryReport.aspx?eventSessionId=c831a2d8bfb3496689321a76587a52d1&rptId=1496372&EventId=dk7KgEL15Sg%3d 4/5 8/6/2016 Directories US State/Canadian Province: WI Diane Fremgen WI Supreme Court US State/Canadian Province: WV Edythe Gaiser Deputy Clerk West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals Rory Perry Clerk of Court WV Supreme Court US State/Canadian Province: WY Carol Thompson Clerk of Court Wyoming Supreme Court https://www.regonline.com/ActiveReports/CustomReports/DirectoryReport.aspx?eventSessionId=c831a2d8bfb3496689321a76587a52d1&rptId=1496372&EventId=dk7KgEL15Sg%3d 5/5.
Recommended publications
  • No Justice in Utah's Justice Courts: Constitutional Issues, Systemic Problems, and the Failure to Protect Defendants in Utah's Infamous Local Courts Samuel P

    No Justice in Utah's Justice Courts: Constitutional Issues, Systemic Problems, and the Failure to Protect Defendants in Utah's Infamous Local Courts Samuel P

    Utah OnLaw: The Utah Law Review Online Supplement Volume 2012 Article 2 2012 No Justice in Utah's Justice Courts: Constitutional Issues, Systemic Problems, and the Failure to Protect Defendants in Utah's Infamous Local Courts Samuel P. Newton Teresa L. Welch Neal G. Hamilton Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.law.utah.edu/onlaw Part of the Courts Commons, Judges Commons, and the Jurisprudence Commons Recommended Citation Newton, Samuel P.; Welch, Teresa L.; and Hamilton, Neal G. (2012) "No Justice in Utah's Justice Courts: Constitutional Issues, Systemic Problems, and the Failure to Protect Defendants in Utah's Infamous Local Courts," Utah OnLaw: The Utah Law Review Online Supplement: Vol. 2012 , Article 2. Available at: https://dc.law.utah.edu/onlaw/vol2012/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Utah Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Utah OnLaw: The tU ah Law Review Online Supplement by an authorized editor of Utah Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NO JUSTICE IN UTAH’S JUSTICE COURTS: CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES, SYSTEMIC PROBLEMS, AND THE FAILURE TO PROTECT † DEFENDANTS IN UTAH’S INFAMOUS LOCAL COURTS Samuel P. Newton,* Teresa L. Welch,** & Neal G. Hamilton*** [T]here’ll be no Justice of the Peace for you; just a big piece of justice.1 INTRODUCTION Justice courts2 could be called the most loved and hated court in the judicial system. The justices of the peace who preside over the courts are equally polarizing figures. The courts have been called “a powerful, multifaceted, local legal institution”3 which “helped design and weave together the social, economic, and political fabric”4 of American society.
  • Appellant's Reply Brief

    Appellant's Reply Brief

    __________________________________________________________________ IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS, 450 S. State Street, Salt Lake City. Utah 84078 (801) 578-3900 __________________________________________________________________ MACAELA DANYELE DAY, : APPELLANT’S REPLY BRIEF Appellee, : vs. : Case No. 20190277 TYLER BARNES, : Appellant. : APPEAL FROM FINAL ORDER REGARDING RELOCATION THE HONORABLE DAVID M. CONNORS PRESIDING ORAL ARGUMENT AND PUBLISHED OPINION REQUESTED __________________________________________________________________ THEODORE R. WECKEL, JR. ERIC B. BARNES Counsel for Appellant Counsel for Appellee 299 S. Main Street, Suite 1300 47 N. Main Street Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Kaysville, UT 84037 Telephone: (801) 535-4385 Telephone: (801) 801-546-3874 i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES . ii-iii ARGUMENT I. MACAELA’S DUE PROCESS ARGUMENT WAS PRESERVED. 1-5 II. TYLER’S SUFFICIENCY/MARSHALING ARGUMENT FAILS. 5-10 III. REVERSAL IS WARRANTED FOR ERIC BARNES’S ACTIONS. 10- 12 . CONCLUSION . 12 -13 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE . 13 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Day v. Barnes, 2018 UT App. 143, 427 P.3d 1272 . 2 Farley v. Utah County, 2019 UT App 45, 440 P.3d 856 . 9 Hudema v. Carpenter, 1999 UT App. 290, 989 P.2d 491 . 8 Paryzek v. Paryzek, 776 P.2d 78 (UT App. 1989) . 6 Pledger v. Cox, 626 P.2d 415 (UT 1981) . 3 Robertson v. Robertson, 2016 UT App. 55, 370 P.3d 569 . 6, 8 Sterling Fiduciaries, LLC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, 2017 UT App. 135, 402 P.3d 130 . 10 United States v. Parker, 101 F.3d 527 (7th Cir. 1996) . 1, 2 ii STATUTES U.C.A. § 30-3-10 . 5 U.C.A. § 30-3-10.2 .
  • David Lee Hewitt V. State of Utah : Brief of Appellee

    David Lee Hewitt V. State of Utah : Brief of Appellee

    Brigham Young University Law School BYU Law Digital Commons Utah Court of Appeals Briefs 1993 David Lee Hewitt .v State of Utah : Brief of Appellee Utah Court of Appeals Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_ca1 Part of the Law Commons Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Court of Appeals; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors. Jan Graham; Attorney General; James H. Beadles; Assistant Attorney General; Attorney for Appellee. David Lee Hewitt; Utah State Prison; Appearing Pro Se. Recommended Citation Brief of Appellee, Hewitt .v Utah, No. 930035 (Utah Court of Appeals, 1993). https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_ca1/3924 This Brief of Appellee is brought to you for free and open access by BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Utah Court of Appeals Briefs by an authorized administrator of BYU Law Digital Commons. Policies regarding these Utah briefs are available at http://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/utah_court_briefs/policies.html. Please contact the Repository Manager at [email protected] with questions or feedback. UTAH COURT OF APPEALS UTAH DOCUMENT KFU 50 .A10 IN THE tJTAH C0URT 0F DOCKET NO APPEALS DAVID LEE HEWITT, : Petitioner and Appellant, s: Case No, 930035-CA V. J : Priority No, 3 STATE OF UTAH, s Respondent and Appellee. ; BRIEF OF APPELLEE APPEAL FROM DENIAL OF PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY WRIT IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH, THE HONORABLE MICHAEL J.
  • Finlayson V. State of Utah [10846589] 07/28/2021

    Finlayson V. State of Utah [10846589] 07/28/2021

    Appellate Case: 19-4151 Document: 010110554585 Date Filed: 07/28/2021 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 28, 2021 Christopher M. Wolpert FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court _________________________________ JEFFERY RUSSELL FINLAYSON, Petitioner - Appellant, v. No. 19-4151 STATE OF UTAH, Respondent - Appellee. _________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Utah (D.C. No. 2:15-CV-00818-DAK) _________________________________ Andrew Parnes, the Law Office of Andrew Parnes, Ketchum, Idaho, for Petitioner- Appellant Jeffery Russell Finlayson. Erin Riley, Assistant Solicitor General, Salt Lake City, Utah, (Sean D. Reyes, Attorney General, Salt Lake City, Utah, with her on the brief) for Respondent-Appellee State of Utah. _________________________________ Before HOLMES, BACHARACH, and CARSON, Circuit Judges. _________________________________ CARSON, Circuit Judge. _________________________________ A Utah state court dismissed Petitioner Jeffery Russell Finlayson’s habeas corpus proceeding for failure to prosecute. After appealing that decision, Petitioner brought a petition in federal court under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. But the district court Appellate Case: 19-4151 Document: 010110554585 Date Filed: 07/28/2021 Page: 2 found the state court’s dismissal procedurally barred federal relief. So the district court dismissed the petition and granted judgment for Respondent the State of Utah, denying a certificate of appealability. Petitioner appealed, and a judge of this Court issued a certificate of appealability on two issues. We exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253(a) and affirm the district court on both issues. I. In 2005, Petitioner filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a Utah state court, related to his 1995 conviction for sex crimes (the state court petition).
  • Supreme Court of the United States

    Supreme Court of the United States

    No. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES GREG ANDERSON Petitioner, VS. GARY HERBERT et. al. Respondents. PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Greg Anderson pro se 24 South 7' Street Tooele, Utah 84074 Phone: 385 231-5005 NOV 1 - 2018 QUESTION PRESENTED Is a judgment void on its face, when a State Court steals a paid-for home at the motion to dismiss stage of the proceedings, under the guise that the owner was a tenant, where plaintiff attorneys misrepresented the law and contractual terms of the purchase contract 30 times in a 6 page document, then wrote the "Statement of Facts and Conclusions of Law," with no reference to the purported record, and the judge rubber-stamped plaintiffs claims, and the court denied itself jurisdiction by not strictly adhering to the statute, thereby implicating conspiracy. 11 PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDINGS BELOW Petitioner is Greg Anderson. Respondents Are Gary Herbert in His Official Capacity as Governor of the State of Utah, Sean Reyes in His Official Capacity as Attorney General for the State of Utah, Clark A McClellan, in His Individual Capacity, and in His Official Capacity for His Extra- judicial Acts, Third District Court, in its Official Capacity, Eighth District Court in its Official Capacity, Utah Court of Appeals in its Official Capacity, Daniel W. Kitchen, James L. Ahistrom, Terry Welch, Lynn Kitchen, Gary Kitchen, Mathew J. Kitchen, Mark R. Kitchen, Sandbay LLC Sunlake LLC, Orchid Beach LLC Roosevelt Hills LLC, John or Jane Doe(s) 1 Through 10 Note: No John or Jane Doe's have been named, nor have any other parties.
  • Nevada Judicial Directory

    Nevada Judicial Directory

    NEVADA JUDICIAL DIRECTORY www.nevadajudiciary.us PREPARED BY: JAMES W. HARDESTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS CHIEF JUSTICE TABLE OF CONTENTS SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA ......................................................................................................................1 NEVADA COURT OF APPEALS .......................................................................................................................2 OFFICE OF THE CLERK ...................................................................................................................................3 CENTRAL STAFF ................................................................................................................................................3 LAW LIBRARY.....................................................................................................................................................3 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS ............................................................................................4 SENIOR JUDGES .................................................................................................................................................7 DISTRICT COURTS.............................................................................................................................................9 JUSTICES OF THE PEACE ..............................................................................................................................29 MUNICIPAL COURT JUDGES ........................................................................................................................38
  • IN the SUPREME COURT of PENNSYLVANIA No. 4 MAP 2021 League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania and Lorraine Haw, V. Veronica Degraff

    IN the SUPREME COURT of PENNSYLVANIA No. 4 MAP 2021 League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania and Lorraine Haw, V. Veronica Degraff

    Received 4/12/2021 3:42:16 PM Supreme Court Middle District 4 MAP 2021 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 4 MAP 2021 League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania and Lorraine Haw, v. Veronica Degraffenreid, Acting Secretary of the Commonwealth, Appeal of: Shameekah Moore, Martin Vickless, Kristin June Irwin and Kelly Williams BRIEF FOR NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS AS AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF APPELLEES APPEAL FROM THE ORDER OF THE COMMONWEALTH COURT, DOCKET NO. 578 MD 2019, SITTING IN ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Lisa A. Mathewson, Esq. Gopal Balachandran, Esq. PA Attorney I.D. No. 77137 PA Attorney I.D. No. 323557 THE LAW OFFICES OF PENN STATE LAW*** LISA A. MATHEWSON, LLC INDIGENT CRIMINAL JUSTICE 123 South Broad Street, Suite 1320 PRACTICUM—CRIMINAL Philadelphia, PA 19109 APPELLATE/POST (215) 399-9592 CONVICTION TRACK 223 Lewis Katz Building University Park, PA 16802 (814) 867-5946 Participated in Drafting: Graham Ball Certified Legal Intern No. 255 INT 2020 Ryan Reilly Certified Legal Intern No. 43 INT 2020 Filed 4/12/2021 3:42:00 PM Supreme Court Middle District ***This Brief is filed in the individual capacity of the author and in no way reflects, or is meant to reflect, the views of Penn State Law or Penn State University. The institution is attached for affiliation purposes only. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. THE INTERESTS OF AMICUS CURIAE ..................................................... 1 II. SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ....................................................................... 2 III. ARGUMENT FOR AMICUS CURIAE ......................................................... 3 A. Introduction ........................................................................................... 3 B. The right “to reasonable and timely notice of and to be present at all public proceedings involving the criminal or delinquent conduct” has impaired the administration of justice and cost counties and states millions of dollars.
  • Appellee's Brief

    Appellee's Brief

    IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS 450 South State Street, SLC, UT 84111 (801) 578-3900 MACAELA DAY, PUBLIC Petitioner/Appellant, vs. Appellate Court No. 20190277 TYLER BARNES, Respondent/Appellee BRIEF OF APPELLEE ________________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Second Judicial District Court, Davis County, from a final order denying a change in physical custody through a motion to relocate before the Honorable David M. Connors, District Court No. 134700668 ________________________________________________________________________ Theodore R. Weckel, JR. Eric B. Barnes 299 S. MAIN STREET, SUITE 1300 47 North Main Street Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Kaysville, Utah 84037 Telephone: (801) 535-4385 Telephone: (801) 546-3874 Attorney for Appellant Attorney for Appellee Oral Argument Requested Non-Public Opinion Requested __________________ Table of Contents Table of Authorities ........................................................................................................ iv Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 Jurisdictional Statement .................................................................................................. 1 Statement of the Issues and Standards of Review ...................................................... 1 Determinative Provisions ............................................................................................... 2 Statement of the Case .....................................................................................................
  • Nevada Supreme Court Access to Justice Commission November 21, 2017 2:00 PM – 4:00 PM

    Nevada Supreme Court Access to Justice Commission November 21, 2017 2:00 PM – 4:00 PM

    Nevada Supreme Court Access to Justice Commission November 21, 2017 2:00 PM – 4:00 PM Video Conference Sites: Las Vegas Carson City Reno NV Supreme Court NV Supreme Court 2nd Judicial District Ct. Conf. Room A & B Law Library, Room 107 75 Court Street – Room 214 Elko 4th Judicial District Court Department 2 Jury Room Teleconference: Dial In: 877.594.8353 / Participant Code: 356-882-81 Meeting Agenda I. Opening Statements from Co-Chairs & Commission Roll Call 5 minutes II. Consent Agenda 5 minutes Tab 1 Approval of March 24, 2017 ATJ Commission Meeting Minutes Approval of May 23, 2017 IOLTA Rate Review Approval of October 23, 2017 IOLTA Rate Review (Rate Review Adoption) III. Melanie Kushnir Fellowship Final Project Presentation 10 minutes Tab 2 Matthew Cook on Google AdWords IV. Discussion Items Tab 3 2017-2018 Nevada Civil Legal Needs Assessment 30 minutes o Update – Ken Smith, The Resource for Great Programs ATJ Commission Membership/Expansion Update 20 minutes o Expansion Subcommittee Meeting and Possible Membership Rule Change Consideration Policies to Support and Improve Access to Justice 30 minutes o Preapproval or Reimbursement of Expenses for Pro Bono Counsel o Electronic Filing by Non-Lawyers (8th Judicial) o Judge Harter Rule Petition to Permit Licensed Judicial Clerks to Perform Pro Bono V. Programming Reports 15 minutes Tab 4 Appellate Law Pro Bono Program – Prof. Anne Traum Rural Concerns/Website/Forms Project – Hon. Nathan Tod Young Public Lawyers Partnership/AG Military Pro Bono Program – Judge Frank Sullivan VI. Other Business 1 Nevada Supreme Court Access to Justice Commission November 21, 2017 2:00 PM – 4:00 PM VII.
  • MANUAL on PRO BONO APPEALS PROGRAMS for State Court Appeals Second Edition ~ November 2017

    MANUAL on PRO BONO APPEALS PROGRAMS for State Court Appeals Second Edition ~ November 2017

    MANUAL ON PRO BONO APPEALS PROGRAMS For State Court Appeals Second Edition ~ November 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 3 Basic Considerations In Creating A Program .......................................................................... 5 Arizona .......................................................................................................................................... 9 California: Los Angeles County ............................................................................................... 14 Colorado ...................................................................................................................................... 16 Florida .......................................................................................................................................... 18 Hawaii.......................................................................................................................................... 21 Indiana ......................................................................................................................................... 24 Massachusetts ............................................................................................................................. 25 Minnesota ...................................................................................................................................
  • Appellant's Brief

    Appellant's Brief

    __________________________________________________________________ IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS, 450 S. State Street, Salt Lake City. Utah 84078 (801) 578-3900 __________________________________________________________________ MACAELA DANYELE DAY, : APPELLANT’S PRINCIPAL BRIEF Appellee, : vs. : Case No. 20190277 TYLER BARNES, : Appellant. : APPEAL FROM FINAL ORDER REGARDING RELOCATION THE HONORABLE DAVID M. CONNORS PRESIDING ORAL ARGUMENT AND PUBLISHED OPINION REQUESTED __________________________________________________________________ THEODORE R. WECKEL, JR. ERIC B. BARNES Counsel for Appellant Counsel for Appellee 299 S. Main Street, Suite 1300 47 N. Main Street Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Kaysville, UT 84037 Telephone: (801) 535-4385 Telephone: (801) 801-546-3874 i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES . ii-iv INTRODUCTION . 1-2 STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES . I. WHETHER THE RELOCATION HEARING DENIED APPELLANT DUE PROCESS? . 2 II. WHETHER THE COURT’S FINDINGS ARE DEFICIENT? . 2 III. WHETHER THE RELOCATION RULING WAS ERRONEOUS? . 2 STATEMENT OF THE CASE . 2-4 STATEMENT OF THE FACTS . 4-32 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT . 32 ARGUMENT . I. THE RELOCATION HEARING DENIED APPELLANT DUE PROCESS. 33-35 II. THE FINDINGS ARE GROSSLY INADEQUATE . 35-50 III. THE RELOCATION RULING IS ERRONEOUS . 50-55 CONCLUSION . 55 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE . 55 ADDENDUM . 56 Addendum A — U.C.A. Section 30-3-37 ii Addendum B — Utah R. Civ. P. 108 Addendum C — Findings of Fact and Order on Objection (Filed 4/25/14) Addendum D –– Order Regarding Petitioner’s Objections to Commissioner’s Recommendation (Filed 10/19/16) Addendum E — Ruling and Order On Petitioner’s Objections to Commissioner’s Recommendation (After Remand) TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Day v. Barnes, 2018 UT App. 143, 427 P.3d 1272 .
  • Chapter 7 Appeals

    Chapter 7 Appeals

    CHAPTER 7 APPEALS IN GENERAL This chapter provides information about state law provisions concerning appeals authorities and time limitations for review for first-level appeals, second-level appeals, and judicial review. The Social Security Act (SSA) requires states to offer “opportunity for a fair hearing before an impartial tribunal, for all individuals whose claims for unemployment compensation are denied.” Hence, all states’ laws provide for a right to appeal. Further, all but a few states’ laws provide for a second-level appeal. In all states, individuals who are not satisfied with the outcome of the administrative appeal(s) may appeal their cases in the state court system, federal courts, and, as a last resort, the U.S. Supreme Court. In all states, employers who have an interest are granted the right to appeal decisions on claims as well. As a result of California Department of Human Resources Development v. Java, 402 U.S. 121 (1971), once a UI claimant has been found eligible for benefits, such claimant will continue to receive benefits until a decision is issued reversing the determination allowing benefits. Thus, an employer’s appeal will not affect the continuance of payment of benefits until a subsequent decision is issued denying benefits. The majority of state laws specifically provide for the payment of benefits pending an appeal of a determination or decision allowing benefits, while other states have either interpreted their laws or have been required by court order to follow this procedure. In all states, this procedure applies to any determination or decision issued allowing benefits. Most of the states specify that findings of fact, conclusions of law, or final orders made by a UI hearing officer or board of review will not be binding in any separate or subsequent proceeding brought in any court, judicial, administrative, or arbitration proceeding in that state or of the U.S.