DOCSLIB.ORG

Moseneke Not Available for CJ Job

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Moseneke Not Available for CJ Job Legalbrief | your legal news hub Monday 27 September 2021 Moseneke not available for CJ job Deputy Chief Justice Dikgang Moseneke has told the JSC his is not available for consideration for the vacant position of Chief Justice - not now or in the future, writes Legalbrief. According to a report in the Sunday Times, Moseneke, who chaired the commission's deliberations on the appointment of the new Chief Justice at the weekend, told commissioners during a closed session that he preferred to serve out the remainder of his term. In his statement at the meeting in Cape Town, Moseneke said he felt honoured by those who saw him as a suitable candidate to lead the judiciary, but that he was not available for the job. 'Let me make it clear that as much as I consider it an honour to be thought of as a potential nominee for the position of Chief Justice, I have never solicited or accepted any nomination and I am not available to accept nomination whatever its source, now or after the deliberations of this commission. Therefore, I am neither a hopeful, nor a nominee or a contender past or future for the position of chief justice.' The paper claims to have been told by a source close to Moseneke that the respected jurist felt uncomfortable with the whole debate being personalised around him, and with different parties nominating him outside of the proper process. Full Sunday Times report The JSC will not call for further nominations for the Chief Justice's post other than President Jacob Zuma's nomination, Judge Mogoeng Mogoeng. There had been 'lengthy deliberations' and a 'secret ballot' and the majority of the commission had decided they would not call for further nominations, JSC spokesperson CP Fourie said, according to a report on the Mail & Guardian Online site. 'The JSC deliberated on whether it would call for further nominations other than that made by the President and resolved by a majority that it is neither permissible nor desirable to do so. The JSC will convene a meeting to which it will invite the nominee of the President to submit to an interview for the purpose of determining the suitability of that candidate to be appointed as Chief Justice,' he said. 'The proposed date for the public interview is Saturday, 3 September, in Cape Town.' The JSC will also invite various law bodies to make written submissions on the Mogoeng's suitability for the position. These include the General Council of the Bar, the Law Society, the Magistrates Association and the Department of justice and Constitutional Development. Full Mail & Guardian On line report See also a report in Die Burger The JSC's decision has been questioned by the Freedom Front Plus and the Institute for Accountability in Southern Africa, according to a Business Day report. The institute's director, Paul Hoffman SC, reportedly told the paper the commission's decision not to call for additional nominations was the wrong interpretation of the Constitution. The Constitution states that the President, after consulting with the commission and leaders of the parties represented in the National Assembly, appoints the Chief Justice. Hoffman said Zuma should have called for nominations and then proceeded to make a choice. 'In a multiparty democracy; this does not mean that the President should nominate the candidate and that political parties and the commission agree with his choice,' Hoffman is quoted as saying. The Freedom Front Plus yesterday requested Zuma to submit more names for consideration. Pieter Mulder, the party's leader, said the Constitution states a requirement of the appointment of a new Chief Justice is that leaders of opposition parties be consulted when such an appointment is made. Full Business Day report DA justice spokesperson, Dene Smuts, said the party would only comment on Mogoeng's nomination when DA leader Helen Zille gave Zuma her reply on Mogoeng's suitability for the position and after the JSC has had an opportunity to interview the nominee. The DA has also called for the Mogoeng interview to be public, notes a report on the News24 site. Other opposition parties have strongly opposed Mogoeng's nomination on the grounds that he lacks the necessary experience, especially on constitutional issues. And, according to a second report on the News24 site, AfriForum says it will seek legal opinion on the constitutionality of the process followed by Zuma in announcing his nomination. First report on the News24 site Second report on the News24 site Mogoeng has the support of a colleague. One of the arguments being used against his appointment - that he failed to recuse himself even though his wife, Mmaphefo Mogoeng, was a state attorney in a matter before him, is challenged by long-time colleague and current North West Judge President Monica Leeuw in an article (Judging the judge) in the Sunday Times. She is quoted as saying: 'He didn't see anything wrong (with his wife appearing before him), especially because he wasn't presiding alone; he was with a colleague and it has happened in the Constitutional Court. He used that as his guide. Chief Justice Arthur Chaskalson's son (Matthew) appeared on several occasions before his father. It's family isn't it?' Judging the judge report Mogoeng's religious beliefs are the subject of an article in Rapport, which says that if he believes what his church preaches, he will be in conflict with the Constitution. It says the Winners Chapel International church believes homosexuality is a perversion and members can buy the Bishop's book on how to get divine deliverance from it. The church was founded and is guided by Nigerian Bishop David Oyedepo, says the report. It believes in faith-healing for various diseases and has published the testimony of a man whose prayers it claims brought a baby into the world after the mother had been pregnant for five years and seven months, but was unable to deliver the child. Mogoeng delivers 'pastoral services' for the church, but does not preach, church leaders said. Paul Hoffman, of the Institute for Accountability in Southern Africa, is quoted as saying Mogoeng's religious convictions raise the possibility of a conflict between church, state and the Bench. 'What will happen if he feels his religion convictions are more important than his work?' Full report in Rapport Another Mogoeng judgment has received media attention. Rapport and City Press have highlighted an unreported judgment in the North West High Court in which Mogoeng, reviewing the case of a woman brutally assaulted by her boyfriend, reduced the man's sentence. The woman was tied to a vehicle with wire and dragged at a 'fairly high speed' behind the car for some 50 metres on a gravel road. The papers say that after hearing the matter on review in 2001, Mogoeng held that the two years sentence of Eric Mathibe was 'too harsh by any standards', noting, among other things, that he had been 'provoked' by the complainant. Mogoeng noted the complainant did not sustain 'serious injuries'. She had several abrasions on her stomach, right leg and both knees. The victim was in pain, but Mathibe refused to let her have medical treatment on the day of the incident. He took her to consult a doctor the following day. The trial magistrate defended the sentence by saying assault on women was a problem in the district and that the crime was 'barbaric and ancient'. Mogoeng changed the effective sentence to a fine of R2 000. Full report in Rapport Full report in City Press Mogoeng's first case if appointed could be the decision over the independent arms deal contract inquiry, says a report on The New Age site. It notes Terry Crawford-Browne's application to the Constitutional Court is set to be heard in front of a full Bench of judges on 20 September. The report says Mogoeng's detractors will closely follow proceedings when the court decides on the application, which may open up a political can of worms if President Jacob Zuma is forced to appoint a commission of inquiry into the arms deals that took place in 1999. Zuma is opposing the application. While the decision on Crawford-Browne's application will not rest solely with Mogoeng, legal experts have questioned Mogoeng's independence and whether he can take decisions against the executive. Full report on The New Age site .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Constitutional Authority and Its Limitations: the Politics of Sexuality in South Africa
    South Africa Constitutional Authority and its Limitations: The Politics of Sexuality in South Africa Belinda Beresford Helen Schneider Robert Sember Vagner Almeida “While the newly enfranchised have much to gain by supporting their government, they also have much to lose.” Adebe Zegeye (2001) A history of the future: Constitutional rights South Africa’s Constitutional Court is housed in an architecturally innovative complex on Constitution Hill, a 100-acre site in central Johannesburg. The site is adjacent to Hillbrow, a neighborhood of high-rise apartment buildings into which are crowded thousands of mi- grants from across the country and the continent. This is one of the country’s most densely populated, cosmopolitan and severely blighted urban areas. From its position atop Constitu- tion Hill, the Court offers views of Hillbrow’s high-rises and the distant northern suburbs where the established white elite and increasing numbers of newly affluent non-white South Africans live. Thus, while the light-filled, colorful and contemporary Constitutional Court buildings reflect the progressive and optimistic vision of post-apartheid South Africa the lo- cation is a reminder of the deeply entrenched inequalities that continue to define the rights of the majority of people in the country and the continent. CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY AND ITS LIMITATIONS: THE POLITICS OF SEXUALITY IN SOUTH AFRICA 197 From the late 1800s to 1983 Constitution Hill was the location of Johannesburg’s central prison, the remains of which now lie in the shadow of the new court buildings. Former prison buildings include a fort built by the Boers (descendents of Dutch settlers) in the late 1800s to defend themselves against the thousands of men and women who arrived following the discovery of the area’s expansive gold deposits.
    [Show full text]
  • Appointments to South Africa's Constitutional Court Since 1994
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 15 July 2015 Version of attached le: Accepted Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Johnson, Rachel E. (2014) 'Women as a sign of the new? Appointments to the South Africa's Constitutional Court since 1994.', Politics gender., 10 (4). pp. 595-621. Further information on publisher's website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X14000439 Publisher's copyright statement: c Copyright The Women and Politics Research Section of the American 2014. This paper has been published in a revised form, subsequent to editorial input by Cambridge University Press in 'Politics gender' (10: 4 (2014) 595-621) http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=PAG Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk Rachel E. Johnson, Politics & Gender, Vol. 10, Issue 4 (2014), pp 595-621. Women as a Sign of the New? Appointments to South Africa’s Constitutional Court since 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project
    The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project STEVE McDONALD Interviewed by: Dan Whitman Initial Interview Date: August 17, 2011 Copyright 2018 ADST TABLE OF CONTENTS Education MA, South African Policy Studies, University of London 1975 Joined Foreign Service 1975 Washington, DC 1975 Desk Officer for Portuguese African Colonies Pretoria, South Africa 1976-1979 Political Officer -- Black Affairs Retired from the Foreign Service 1980 Professor at Drury College in Missouri 1980-1982 Consultant, Ford Foundation’s Study 1980-1982 “South Africa: Time Running Out” Head of U.S. South Africa Leadership Exchange Program 1982-1987 Managed South Africa Policy Forum at the Aspen Institute 1987-1992 Worked for African American Institute 1992-2002 Consultant for the Wilson Center 2002-2008 Consulting Director at Wilson Center 2009-2013 INTERVIEW Q: Here we go. This is Dan Whitman interviewing Steve McDonald at the Wilson Center in downtown Washington. It is August 17. Steve McDonald, you are about to correct me the head of the Africa section… McDONALD: Well the head of the Africa program and the project on leadership and building state capacity at the Woodrow Wilson international center for scholars. 1 Q: That is easy for you to say. Thank you for getting that on the record, and it will be in the transcript. In the Wilson Center many would say the prime research center on the East Coast. McDONALD: I think it is true. It is a think tank a research and academic body that has approximately 150 fellows annually from all over the world looking at policy issues.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life Esidimeni Tragedy in South Africa Ebenezer Durojaye and Daphine Kabagambe Agaba
    HHr Health and Human Rights Journal perspective HHR_final_logo_alone.indd 1 10/19/15 10:53 AM Contribution of the Health Ombud to Accountability: The Life Esidimeni Tragedy in South Africa ebenezer durojaye and daphine kabagambe agaba Introduction Between October 2015 and June 2016, 1,711 people were relocated from mental health facilities operated by long-term provider Life Esidimeni in the South African province of Gauteng to alternative facilities managed by multiple nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). The result of the change in providers, and the manner in which the transfers were managed, became a tragedy that culminated in the death of 144 mental health care patients and the exposure of 1,418 others to torture, trauma, and poor health outcomes.1 The state was unable to ascertain the whereabouts of a further 44 patients. The tragedy began in October 2015, when the then member of the Executive Council for health in the populous Gauteng province, which includes Johannesburg and Pretoria, announced the termination of a 40-year contract between the Department of Health and Life Esidimeni for the provision of mental health services.2 The NGO facilities to which the patients were transferred were ill prepared and ill equipped for the influx of patients.3 The tragedy drew further public attention in September 2016, when, responding to a question raised in Parliament, the member of the Executive Council for health said that about 36 former residents of Life Esidimeni had died under mysterious circumstances following their transfers. South
    [Show full text]
  • Lack of Transformation in Judiciary Investigative Report (2016) By
    CGE INVESTIGATIVE REPORT:Layout 1 12/5/16 5:53 PM Page 1 LACK OF GENDER TRANSFORMATION IN THE JUDICIARY INVESTIGATIVE REPORT 2016 CGE INVESTIGATIVE REPORT:Layout 1 12/5/16 5:53 PM Page 2 CGE INVESTIGATIVE REPORT:Layout 1 12/5/16 5:53 PM Page 3 LACK OF GENDER TRANSFORMATION IN THE JUDICIARY Complaint Ref No: WC/DRGU & Sonke/2012/KL Democratic Governance and Rights Unit and Sonke Gender Justice Network Complainants And The Presidency The Minister of the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development Judicial Service Commission Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court Respondents1 “There’s a lot of sexism. If you are a woman you have to go on a course to become a judge, but a man can simply serve as an acting judge and apply for the job. Men have thought of this [course] as a marvellous thing. They think this is helping women become judges. They are incredibly proud of their expensive courses2. Judge Satchwell 1 As per the lodged complaint 2 Omphitlhetse , Mooki , The Star Newspaper , August 2012: “ Women can do it too” 3 CGE INVESTIGATIVE REPORT:Layout 1 12/5/16 5:53 PM Page 4 LACK OF GENDER TRANSFORMATION IN THE JUDICIARY CONTENTS PAGES 1. Introduction 6 2. Parties 7 3. Nature and Background to the Complaint 10 4. Legal Framework 12 5. Gender Transformation in the Judiciary – the current status quo (institutional analysis) 28 6. Investigation / Steps taken 33 7. Findings and recommendations 58 8. Conclusion 61 9. Annexures A1 The Presidency of the Republic of South Africa 64 A2 Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development 68
    [Show full text]
  • The Formal Court Sitting to Mark the Departure of Deputy Chief Justice Dikgang Moseneke from the Constitutional Court of South
    The Formal Court Sitting to Mark the Departure of Deputy Chief Justice Dikgang Moseneke from the Constitutional Court of South Africa Friday, 20 May 2016 Chief Justice, former President Thabo Mbeki and Mrs Mbeki; former President Kgalema Motlanthe and Mrs Motlanthe, President and Deputy President of the Supreme Court of Appeal. Justices of the Constitutional Court – both currently sitting and retired. Judges President, Heads of Courts and Judges of all our courts, the Chairperson of the National Council of Provinces, Deputy Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development, leaders of political parties and of social movements, all formations within the legal fraternity, Deans of Law Schools, members of my family, and in particular my wife, Kabo Moseneke and my mother, Karabo Moseneke. Allow me also to welcome all patriots, compatriots and citizens of our land and friends who have cared to come and observe this moment with us. I will cease to hold office as a Deputy Chief Justice of the Republic and retire from the Constitutional Court of South Africa at midnight today, 20 May 2016. I have had the distinct privilege of serving the judicial bench for 15 years; of which no less than a continuous period of 14 years I served in the Highest Court of the Republic. A formal ceremony, such as the present, is by now well etched in our judicial convention. The Judiciary knows no better way of celebrating and sending off one of its own than in the very forum in which it dispenses justice. It is a time honoured tradition that on an occasion as the present, fellow colleagues who 1 hold judicial office would robe and so would counsel and be in attendance as a mark of homage to the departing Justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Life Esidimeni Arbitration Award
    IN THE ARBITRATION BETWEEN: FAMILIES OF MENTAL HEALTH CARE USERS AFFECTED BY THE GAUTENG MENTAL MARATHON PROJECT Claimants And NATIONAL MINISTER OF HEALTH OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA GOVERNMENT OF THE PROVINCE OF GAUTENG PREMIER OF THE PROVINCE OF GAUTENG MEMBER OF THE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL OF HEALTH: PROVINCE OF GAUTENG Respondents BEFORE JUSTICE DIKGANG MOSENEKE MOSENEKE J AWARD Introduction [1] This is a harrowing account of the death, torture and disappearance of utterly vulnerable mental health care users in the care of an admittedly delinquent provincial government. It is also a story of the searing and public anguish of the families of the affected mental health care users and of the collective shock and pain of many other caring people in our land and elsewhere in the world. These inhuman narratives were rehearsed before me, the Arbitrator, in arbitral proceedings I am about to describe. [2] It is now undisputed that as a result of their move out of Life Esidimeni facilities after 1 October 2015, 144 mental health care users died and 1418 were exposed to trauma and morbidity amongst other results, but survived. Of the known survivors, the State informs that the whereabouts of 44 mental health care users remain unknown. [3] The Life Esidimeni Arbitration was established following Recommendation 17 of the Health Ombudsperson’s “Report into the circumstances surrounding the deaths of mentally ill patients: Gauteng Province” (Ombud’s Report).1 The parties,2 referred their dispute to arbitration before a single arbitrator. This they did subject to a written arbitration agreement concluded on 8 September 20173 and subject to the provisions of the Arbitration Act4.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 Making the Road.Fm
    INTRODUCTION HAPTER C 1 Michael Cosser, Narnia Bohler-Muller & Gary Pienaar 1Introduction 1.1 Making the road by walking The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, the final draft of which was forged over a two-year period between 1994 and 1996, assumed a particular profile in the body politic in 2016. Following the release of the Public Protector’s 2014 report on improvements to President Zuma’s Nkandla residence,1 the Constitutional Court in March 2016 declared binding her findings and recommendations about the need for the President to repay public monies spent on non-security upgrades to his residence.2 Such high-profile cases, however, can distract us from the importance of the Constitution in shaping the lives of ordinary people. In catapulting the Constitution into the limelight, the ‘Nkandla judgement’, as it is known colloquially, has created renewed interest in what meaning the Constitution has for South Africans in 2018 and beyond. The initial impetus for this book came from a public address by former Chief Justice Sandile Ngcobo. Delivered on 30 June 2016 and entitled ‘Why does the Constitution matter?’, his address began with an almost throwaway comment: that he was ‘privileged enough … to participate in constructing our foundational jurisprudence on constitutional law.’3 Ngcobo went on to say that the process of building a constitutional 1 Public Protector South Africa ‘Secure in comfort’ http://www.pprotect.org/library/ investigation_report/2013-14/Final Report 19 March 2014 pdf (accessed 23 May 2017). 2 Economic Freedom Fighters v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others 2016 (3) SA 580 (CC).
    [Show full text]
  • Seven Priorities to Drive the National Development Plan – President Ramaphosa
    Oath of office 7 6 reminds MPs 8 Smaller parties of their duty to all NA and NCOP promise tough South Africans, will put the oversight in says Chief Justice people first 6th Parliament Mogoeng Vol. 01 Official Newspaper of the Parliament of the Republic of South Africa Issue 03 2019 The Speaker of the NA, Ms Thandi Modise (left), President Cyril Ramaphosa, the first lady Tshepo Motsepe and the Chairperson of the NCOP, Mr Amos Masondo (far right) on the steps of the NA. Seven priorities to drive the National Development Plan – President Ramaphosa President Cyril social cohesion and safe of the national effort, to make communities, a capable, ethical it alive, to make it part of the Ramaphosa told and developmental state, a lived experience of the South the nation that his better Africa and world. African people. government will focus on seven priorities, He said all the government “As South Africa enters the programmes and policies next 25 years of democracy, writes Zizipho Klaas. across all departments and and in pursuit of the objectives agencies will be directed in of the NDP, let us proclaim a The priorities are, economic pursuit of these overarching bold and ambitious goal, a transformation and job tasks. unifying purpose, to which we creation, education, skills and dedicate all our resources and health, consolidating the social At the same time, President energies,” he stressed. wage through reliable and Ramaphosa said the quality basic services, spatial government must restore the Within the priorities of this integration, human settlements National Development Plan administration, President and local government, (NDP) to its place at the centre Ramaphosa said 2 The Khoisan praise singer praises President Ramaphosa.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Heinz Klug July 2020 Law School, University of Wisconsin-Madison
    Heinz Klug July 2020 Law School, University of Wisconsin-Madison 975 Bascom Mall, Madison, WI 53706-1399 Ph: (608) 262-2240 Fax: (608) 262-1231 Education University of Wisconsin-Madison, Law School, S.J.D. December 1997. University of California, Hastings College of the Law, J.D. (cum laude) May 1989. University of Natal (Durban) B.A. Honors in Comparative African Government and Administration, 1978. B.A. 1977. Honors and Professional Affiliations Elected, Faculty Graduation Speaker, University of Wisconsin Law School, 2016 Awarded Doctor Honoris Causa, Hasselt University 2013 Advocate of the High Court of South Africa, admitted August 1995. Admitted to the California Bar, December 1989. Editor in Chief, Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 1988-89. Scholarship Award (For Journal Contribution) 1989. Thurston Society (Top 10% of Class) 1989. American Jurisprudence Awards 1986-1989: Legal Writing and Research; International Law; International Human Rights; Editor-in-chief, Hastings International and Comparative Law Review. Class Speaker (elected), Commencement 1989. Member of the Law and Society Association since 1995. Member of the American Bar Association since 1996. Professional Service Member, Board of Trustees, Law and Society Association (Class of 2022). Co-Chair, Program Committee, Law and Society Annual Meeting, Washington DC, May 30 – June 2, 2019. Member, Program Committee, Law and Society Association Annual Meeting, Toronto, Canada, June 7-10, 2018. Faculty and Keynote Speaker, Transnational Law Summer Institute 2017, The Dickson Poon School of Law, Kings College London and University of New South Wales Law School, Sydney, Australia, December 3-8, 2017. Co-Leader (with Helen Kinsella) Faculty Development Seminar, Human Rights and Refugees: Understanding the Global Refugee/Displaced Persons Crisis through History, Politics, Law and Literature, Center for the Humanities, University of Wisconsin- Madison, Fall 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Pressure Builds Against Mogoeng Nomination
    Legalbrief | your legal news hub Tuesday 28 September 2021 Pressure builds against Mogoeng nomination Questions continue to be asked about the fitness of Judge Mogoeng Mogoeng to hold the office of Chief Justice, placing President Jacob Zuma's candidate in a difficult position ahead of an expected grilling over his support for the death penalty, his lack of experience and his alleged homophobia when the JSC holds public hearings on the nomination on Saturday. In a submission to the JSC, the National Association of Democratic Lawyers (Nadel) has questioned Mogoeng's support of the death penalty in a case heard in Bophuthatswana in 1988, notes a Business Day report. 'It is not merely the death sentence itself, but its use and application during the apartheid years that inform Nadel's concerns,' the association says (see report below). The Cape Bar Council and the Johannesburg Bar Council have also opposed Mogoeng's nomination. 'The (Cape Bar) is ... at a loss to understand how a 51-year-old judge with less than two years' experience on the Constitutional Court and less than a handful of truly significant judgments could be preferred as Chief Justice to the 63-year-old Deputy Chief Justice (Dikgang Moseneke),' the Bar wrote in its submission. The Johannesburg Bar Council was equally scathing, questioning Mogoeng's commitment to the Bill of Rights and judicial ethics. According to a report on the News24 site, the Bar Council's response was obtained by Media24 Investigations shortly after it was submitted to the JSC. The report says this submission is the strongest criticism to emerge from his legal peers over his nomination.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Court of South Africa
    CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA INVITATION FOR APPLICATIONS FOR FOREIGN LAW CLERKS MARCH 2019 The Justices of the Constitutional Court of South Africa are pleased to invite applications from outstanding recent law graduates and young lawyers interested in serving as foreign law clerks. Candidates may be appointed to start as soon as July 2019. Background South Africa continues to be regarded as an intriguing example of constitutionalism in the transition to democracy. Its Constitution is viewed as one of the world’s most progressive founding charters. As the country’s highest court, the Constitutional Court is the guardian of that promise. It has, in a range of ground-breaking decisions, given content to the Constitution’s guarantees. The Court has found the death penalty unconstitutional, upheld full equality for gay and lesbian people, declared that resident non-citizens are entitled to social benefits, ordered the government to make anti-retroviral treatment available to pregnant mothers living with HIV/AIDS and mandated full equality for those disadvantaged by past discrimination. In 2012, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg of the United States Supreme Court, said she would not commend the US Constitution to those drafting a constitution, but rather “look at the Constitution of South Africa”: “That was a deliberate attempt to have a fundamental instrument of government that embraced basic human rights [and] had an independent judiciary. It really is, I think, a great piece of work that was done.” About the Position of a Foreign Law Clerk Each year, 15 to 20 young lawyers from around the world serve as foreign law clerks.
    [Show full text]