DOCSLIB.ORG

Impacts of Sakhalin II Phase 2 on Western North Pacific Gray Whales and Related Biodiversity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Impacts of Sakhalin II Phase 2 on Western North Pacific Gray Whales and Related Biodiversity Impacts of Sakhalin II Phase 2 on Western North Pacific Gray Whales and Related Biodiversity Report of the Independent Scientific Review Panel PANEL COMPOSITION Randall R. Reeves (Chairman) Robert L. Brownell, Jr. Timothy J. Ragen Co-opted Contributors: Alexander Burdin Richard G. Steiner John Harwood Justin G. Cooke Glenn R. VanBlaricom David W. Weller James D. Darling Alexander Vedenev Gregory P. Donovan Alexey V. Yablokov Frances M. D. Gulland Sue E. Moore Douglas P. Nowacek ISRP REPORT: IMPACTS OF SAKHALIN II PHASE 2 ON WESTERN NORTH PACIFIC GRAY WHALES Report of the Independent Scientific Review Panel on the Impacts of Sakhalin II Phase 2 on Western North Pacific Gray Whales and Related Biodiversity CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..............................................................................................................................................................3 1 BACKGROUND................................................................................................................................................................3 2 OVERALL CONCLUSIONS.............................................................................................................................................3 3 REVIEW OF INDIVIDUAL THREATS AND PROPOSED MEASURES ......................................................................5 4 INFORMATION GAPS AND ESSENTIAL MONITORING...........................................................................................7 5 THE NEED FOR A COMPREHENSIVE STRATEGY TO SAVE WESTERN GRAY WHALES AND THEIR HABITAT ..........................................................................................................................................................................................8 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.............................................................................................................................................................9 CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................................................10 1 BACKGROUND..............................................................................................................................................................10 2 TERMS OF REFERENCE...............................................................................................................................................10 3 PROCESS FOLLOWED..................................................................................................................................................11 CHAPTER II: REVIEW OF KNOWLEDGE ON WESTERN GRAY WHALES...................................................................14 4 POPULATION IDENTITY .............................................................................................................................................14 5 DISTRIBUTION, MIGRATION, MOVEMENT.............................................................................................................14 6 SAKHALIN HABITAT ...................................................................................................................................................15 7 FEEDING ECOLOGY.....................................................................................................................................................16 8 HEALTH..........................................................................................................................................................................16 9 ABUNDANCE AND BIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS ...................................................................................................19 10 INFORMATION NEEDS ................................................................................................................................................21 CHAPTER III: GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PRESENT AND PROPOSED OIL AND GAS ACTIVITIES IN THE SAKHALIN REGION ...................................................................................................................................................................25 1 OVERVIEW.....................................................................................................................................................................25 2 PRESENT AND PROPOSED OFFSHORE ACTIVITIES..............................................................................................25 CHAPTER IV: DISCUSSION OF ACTUAL AND POTENTIAL THREATS TO WESTERN GRAY WHALES FROM PROPOSED OIL AND GAS ACTIVITIES.................................................................................................................................29 1 NOISE..............................................................................................................................................................................29 2 COLLISIONS...................................................................................................................................................................41 3 OIL AND GAS SPILLS AND ACCIDENTS ..................................................................................................................47 4 ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF PHYSICAL CHANGES TO HABITAT ........................................................................65 1 CONTENTS CHAPTER V: FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTING THE SURVIVAL OF WESTERN GRAY WHALES IN ADDITION TO THOSE ASSOCIATED WITH SAKHALIN OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT ........................................72 1 DIRECT CATCHES ........................................................................................................................................................72 2 BYCATCHES IN FISHING GEAR.................................................................................................................................72 3 VESSEL COLLISIONS ...................................................................................................................................................72 4 DISEASE, TOXIC ALGAL BLOOMS AND EXPOSURE TO CONTAMINANTS......................................................72 5 PREDATION ...................................................................................................................................................................72 CHAPTER VI: CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF THE FACTORS DISCUSSED UNDER CHAPTERS IV & V...................74 1 FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED..................................................................................................................................74 2 SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL SCALES..........................................................................................................................74 3 RECEPTORS (WHALES) AND THEIR RESPONSES ..................................................................................................75 4 MAGNITUDE OF EFFECTS AND THEIR INTERACTIONS ......................................................................................75 CHAPTER VII: USE OF SIMULATION MODELLING TO ASSESS THE IMPLICATIONS OF VARIOUS INDUSTRIAL AND OTHER SCENARIOS ON WESTERN GRAY WHALE SURVIVAL AND RECOVERY.................80 1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................................................80 2 ADDITIONAL DEATHS ................................................................................................................................................84 3 IMPACTS ON FEEDING AND REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS .....................................................................................84 CHAPTER VIII: OVERALL CONCLUSIONS..........................................................................................................................94 1 CUMULATIVE EFFECTS AND MODELLING (CHAPTERS VI AND VII) ...............................................................94 2 NOISE (SEE CHAPTER IV, ITEM 1).............................................................................................................................95 3 COLLISIONS/SHIP STRIKES (SEE CHAPTER IV, ITEM 2).......................................................................................96 4 OIL EXPOSURE (SEE CHAPTER IV, ITEM 3) ............................................................................................................96 5 PHYSICAL DISTURBANCE (SEE CHAPTER IV, ITEM 4) ........................................................................................97 6 PIPELINE SITING DECISION .......................................................................................................................................97 7 ADEQUACY OF DOCUMENTATION..........................................................................................................................97 8 INFORMATION GAPS AND ESSENTIAL MONITORING.........................................................................................97 9 THE NEED FOR A COMPREHENSIVE STRATEGY TO SAVE WESTERN GRAY WHALES AND THEIR HABITAT ........................................................................................................................................................................................98 2 ISRP REPORT: IMPACTS OF SAKHALIN II PHASE 2 ON WESTERN NORTH PACIFIC GRAY WHALES Executive summary 1 BACKGROUND 1.1 The animals and their status The small population of western gray whales, numbering only about 100 animals, is on the edge of survival. It was reduced to such low numbers by commercial whaling
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (Sea of Okhotsk, Sakhalin Island): 2. Cyclopteridae−Molidae Families
    ISSN 0032-9452, Journal of Ichthyology, 2018, Vol. 58, No. 5, pp. 633–661. © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2018. An Annotated List of the Marine and Brackish-Water Ichthyofauna of Aniva Bay (Sea of Okhotsk, Sakhalin Island): 2. Cyclopteridae−Molidae Families Yu. V. Dyldina, *, A. M. Orlova, b, c, d, A. Ya. Velikanove, S. S. Makeevf, V. I. Romanova, and L. Hanel’g aTomsk State University (TSU), Tomsk, Russia bRussian Federal Research Institute of Fishery and Oceanography (VNIRO), Moscow, Russia cInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences (IPEE), Moscow, Russia d Dagestan State University (DSU), Makhachkala, Russia eSakhalin Research Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography (SakhNIRO), Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia fSakhalin Basin Administration for Fisheries and Conservation of Aquatic Biological Resources—Sakhalinrybvod, Aniva, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia gCharles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic *e-mail: [email protected] Received March 1, 2018 Abstract—The second, final part of the work contains a continuation of the annotated list of fish species found in the marine and brackish waters of Aniva Bay (southern part of the Sea of Okhotsk, southern part of Sakhalin Island): 137 species belonging to three orders (Perciformes, Pleuronectiformes, Tetraodon- tiformes), 31 family, and 124 genera. The general characteristics of ichthyofauna and a review of the commer- cial fishery of the bay fish, as well as the final systematic essay, are presented. Keywords: ichthyofauna, annotated list, conservation status, commercial importance, marine and brackish waters, Aniva Bay, southern part of the Sea of Okhotsk, Sakhalin Island DOI: 10.1134/S0032945218050053 INTRODUCTION ANNOTATED LIST OF FISHES OF ANIVA BAY The second part concludes the publication on the 19.
    [Show full text]
  • Earthjustice-2016-Annual-Report.Pdf
    2016 ANNUAL REPORT Our We are here MISSION BECAUSE THE EARTH NEEDS A GOOD LAWYER. Earthjustice is the premier nonprofit public interest environmental law organization. We wield the power of law and the strength of partnership to protect people’s health; to preserve magnificent places and wildlife; to advance clean energy; and to combat climate change. Earthjustice attorney Tom Waldo in Alaska’s Tongass National Forest THANK YOU A Letter from Our President and Board Chair Clean air, clean water, thriving communities, a vibrant, healthy natural world—these are things that most of us hold dear. Regardless of the political party we support, we cherish our rich natural heritage and strive to make the world a better place for our children. Political winds change, but these shared values— values that drive our work here at Earthjustice—stand the test of time. These are the fights we cannot afford to lose. Thanks to your support, Earthjustice made substantial progress in fiscal year 2016. As you will read in these pages, together we won key victories in each of our programs. We protected the wild with our fight to restore wild salmon to the Columbia and Snake Rivers in the Pacific Northwest and our efforts to put the brakes on a sprawling resort complex that threatened the Grand Canyon. With our partners and allies, we made major steps toward addressing the climate crisis, blocking a massive coal strip mine in Montana and coal export facilities on the West Coast, and defeating attacks on renewable energy while winning clean energy advances across the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Investment Strategy for the Russian Far East AUTHORSHIP and ATTRIBUTION
    SASHA LEAHOVCENCO PACIFIC ENVIRONMENT DAVID LAWSON, WWF ELAINE R. WILSON Conservation Investment Strategy Strategy Investment Conservation EXECUTIVE SUMMARY for the Russian Far East Far for the Russian Pacific Environment Pacific 2 Conservation Investment Strategy for the Russian Far East AUTHORSHIP AND ATTRIBUTION Executive Editors: Evan Sparling (Pacific Environment) Eugene Simonov (Pacific Environment, Rivers Without Boundaries) Project Coordinating Team: Eduard Zdor (Chukotka Association of Traditional Marine Mammal Hunters) Dmitry Lisitsyn (Sakhalin Environment Watch) Anatoly Lebedev (Bureau for Regional Outreach Campaigns) Sergey Shapkhaev (Buryat Regional Association for Baikal) Peer Review Group: Alan Holt (Margaret A. Cargill Foundation) David Gordon (Goldman Environmental Prize) Xanthippe Augerot (Pangaea Environmental LLC.) Peter Riggs (Pivot Point) Jack Tordoff (Critical Ecosystems Partnership Fund) Dmitry Lisitsyn (Sakhalin Environment Watch) Conservation Planning Expert: Nicole Portley (Sustainable Fisheries Partnership) Writing and Design: John Byrne Barry Additional Writing and Translating: Sonya Kleshik Special thanks to the following for their contributions to this assessment: Marina Rikhvanova (Baikal Environment Wave), Maksim Chakilev, Yuri Khokhlov, Anatoly Kochnev (Chukotka Branch of the Pacific Ocean Institute for Fisheries and Oceanography), Natalya Shevchenko (Chukotka Regional Department of the Environment (retired)), Oleg Goroshko (Daursky Biosphere Reserve), Elena Tvorogova (Foundation for Revival of Siberian
    [Show full text]
  • Sakhalin Ii Project
    SAKHALIN II PROJECT Sakhalin Island: General Background Sakhalin Island, a former penal colony located off the east coast of Russia and to the north of Japan, holds vast hydrocarbon resources. Oil reserves in the area are estimated at almost 12 billion barrels, and natural gas reserves at approximately 90 trillion cubic feet. International consortia of energy companies have entered into production sharing agreements (PSAs) to develop the resources. Even though all of the consortia have extensive export plans (including to the United States) via LNG terminals and export pipelines to the mainland, there has been little progress except on the first two parts of Sakhalin Island: Sakhalin 1 and Sakhalin 2, which lie to the southeast of Okha (see map to the left, and for more detailed maps click on the project websites for Sakhalin 1 and Sakhalin II below). Technical features The two fields contain an estimated 1.2 billion barrels (190,000,000 m³) of crude oil and 500 billion cubic meters (18 trillion cubic feet) of natural gas, 9.6 million tonnes of liquefied natural gas a year and about 180,000 barrels per day (29,000 m³/d) of oil will be produced. The total project cost until 2014 was originally estimated by Shell to be between $9 and $11 billion US dollars. However, the costs turned out to be substantially underestimated and in July 2005 Shell revised the estimate upwards to $20 billion, causing much consternation among analysts SAKHALIN II PROJECT – RUSSIA page 1 of 4 and Russian business partners alike. There are six main phases to the project: field development in the Piltun-Astokhskoye oil field, field development in the Lunskoye gas field, upgrading infrastructure on the island (IUP — Infrastructure Upgrade Project) which includes building a pipeline to Prigorodnoye on Aniva Bay, building an onshore processing facility (OPF), building an oil export terminal (OET), and building a liquid natural gas (LNG) plant and terminal.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Framing of Fossil Fuels and Solutions To
    CORPORATE FRAMING OF FOSSIL FUELS AND SOLUTIONS TO CLIMATE CHANGE IN OREGON: A DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC RELATIONS AND NETWORKS OF ACTIVIST RESISTANCE by MONICA L. VAUGHAN A THESIS Presented to the School ofJournalism and Communication and the Graduate School ofthe University ofOregon in partial fulfillment ofthe requirements for the degree of Master of Science June 2008 11 "Corporate Framing ofFossil Fuels and Solutions to Climate Change in Oregon: A Discourse Analysis ofPublic Relations and Networks ofActivist Resistance," a thesis prepared by Monica L. Vaughan in partial fulfillment ofthe requirements for the Master ofScience degree in the School ofJournalism and Communication. This thesis has been approved and accepted by: /7_ I, c Committee in Charge: Dr. Carl Bybee, Chair Dr. Debra Merskin Dr. Yvonne Braun Accepted by: J' ". ,'-'i ---.. -- .. --~-._.-- -----_.... Dean ofthe Graduate :school 111 An Abstract ofthe Thesis of Monica L. Vaughan for the degree of Master ofScience in the School ofJournalism and Communication to be taken June 2008 Title: CORPORATE FRAMING OF FOSSIL FUELS AND SOLUTIONS TO CLIMATE CHANGE IN OREGON: A DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC RELATIONS AND NETWORKS OF ACTIVIST RESISTANCE Approved· ICad Bybee This thesis examines the ways in which the fossil fuel industry attempts to manage conflict by projecting an image ofcorporate responsibility to gain access to resources for expansion. Examining the discourse ofcorporate public relations messaging for proposed liquefied natural gas (LNG) infrastructure and state government responses, this research analyzes the local impacts ofthis discourse which draws on the rhetoric of globalization and market-based solutions to climate change. In addition, this research displays the ways in which communities and activists are working to re-frame the discussion ofclimate change solutions, re-framing fossil fuels within a life-cycle global context.
    [Show full text]
  • Illegal Logging in the Russian Far East and Siberia
    International Forestry Review 5(3), 2003 303 Illegal logging in the Russian Far East and Siberia P. VANDERGERT1 and J. NEWELL2 1 Director, Forests Monitor3, 69a Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EN, UK 2 Research Associate in the Department of Geography, University of Washington, USA Email: [email protected], [email protected] INTRODUCTION The nature of forestry operations has changed dramatically over the past decade as central control over The vast forests of the Russian Far East and Siberia forest management has diminished, and liberalisation and represent one of the last great forest wildernesses in the privatisation have become the new mantra. There is much world, containing large expanses of boreal and northern uncertainty at the local and regional level as to who has temperate forest types. These forests are of global responsibility for regulating forestry operations and laws importance as habitat for rare and endangered species, for are often unclear. the richness of biodiversity in areas such as the Sikhote- Whilst officially recorded timber production in the Alin Mountain Range and Sakhalin Island, and to help Russian Far East has declined over the past decade, this mitigate against the effects of global climate change. They masks the unregulated and unrecorded timber production are also home to tens of thousands of indigenous peoples that has characterised much of the industry during this for whom the forest is a spiritual as well as physical space period. Although some large forest concessions exist, these and which also provides traditional livelihoods for many are not the norm. Logging takes place supposedly under thousands more forest-dependent people.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Environment, Thank You for the Opportunity to Comment on the California Air Resource Board’S Draft 2020 Mobile Source Strategy
    May 14, 2021 California Air Resources Board 1001 I Street Sacramento, California 95814 Via Electronic submittal Re: Comments on CARB’s Revised Draft 2020 Mobile Source Strategy On behalf of Pacific Environment, thank you for the opportunity to comment on the California Air Resource Board’s Draft 2020 Mobile Source Strategy. Pacific Environment is a 501(c)(3) public-benefit corporation, headquartered in San Francisco, with regional offices in Anchorage, Alaska, and Chongqing, China. Founded in 1987, Pacific Environment protects communities and wildlife of the Pacific Rim by supporting community leaders to fight climate change, protect the oceans, build just societies, and move away from fossil fuels toward a green economy. We are the only California headquartered non- governmental organization that has earned rare permanent consultative status at the International Maritime Organization (IMO), the United Nations’ entity that sets international shipping law. Our comments here focus on off-road vehicles, marine vessels specifically. We appreciate the work that CARB staff have done on the Revised Draft 2020 Mobile Source Strategy (MSS). However, in the face of interrelated climate, public health and racial justice emergencies here in California and globally and with another disastrous climate change-fueled wildfire season on California’s horizon, the MSS does not go far enough in ambition or pace. Accelerate Low/Zero Emission Transition for Off-Road Marine Vehicles (Vessels) As noted in the MSS, Governor Gavin Newsom issued Executive Order N-79-20 setting statewide targets to transition California’s transportation sector to 100% zero emissions by 2035 to reduce climate-warming, smog-forming, and toxic diesel pollution, which includes marine vessels.
    [Show full text]
  • David Gordon Executive Director Pacific Environment
    Testimony For the Congressional-Executive Commission on China Transparency in Environmental Protection and Climate Change in China Roundtable April 1, 2010 By David Gordon Executive Director Pacific Environment www.pacificenvironment.org Thank you for the opportunity to provide testimony to you today on the subject of transparency in environmental protection and climate change in China. Pacific Environment is a U.S.-based NGO that protects the living environment of the Pacific Rim by promoting grassroots activism, strengthening communities, and reforming international policies. Our successes over the past 20-plus years stem from a deep and abiding trust that local people, armed with the right tools and solid support, are the best hope for protecting the world’s environment. As such, we support the development of grassroots organizations, prioritize community-based advocacy, and leverage international resources in service of our local partners. Together with these grassroots advocates, we have protected tens of millions of acres of wilderness, spearheaded campaigns to protect endangered species, launched efforts to fight water pollution, reformed environmental and social standards for export credit agencies, and publicized critical environmental issues around the Pacific Rim. We support communities in China, Russia, Alaska and California to have a larger voice on the critical environmental issues that affect them, including climate change which increasingly impacts their livelihoods. Pacific Environment has worked in China for over fifteen years, assisting local environmental organizations to grow a mature environmental movement that is effective at working together with the Chinese government to address the most pressing environmental issues affecting China’s development path. The majority of our work in China focuses on strengthening Chinese non-governmental organizations to address water pollution issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Japanese-Russian Energy Cooperation: Problems and Perspectives
    IEEJ: November 2008 For Presentation at the World Civilizations Forum (Rhodes, Greece) October 9-13, 2008 Svetlana Vassiliouk, Ph.D. Analyst, Oil and Gas Group, International Strategy Unit, The Institute of Energy Economics, Japan (IEEJ) Japanese-Russian Energy Cooperation: Problems and Perspectives Introduction Given the geographical proximity, complementary economic needs, and desire to diversify their respective energy policies, Japan (one of the world’s top energy consumers) and Russia (one of the world’s top energy producers) should naturally seek to expand their energy relations with one another. The historical precedents of their bilateral cooperation (even if with limited success) and the lessons that could be learned from the earlier energy cooperation initiatives should provide invaluable insights for the realization of the currently ongoing joint projects and future energy cooperation initiatives between Japan and Russia. Contemporary Japanese-Russian relations have undoubtedly had a very complex and contentious history. However, while the two countries’ trade and economic ties have recently been enjoying a robust growth1, their political relations remain hostage to the unresolved dispute over the four Kurile Islands as a notorious legacy from the WWII period. Despite Japan and the Soviet Union reestablished their diplomatic relations in 1956, the two countries, having failed to conclude their peace agreement and final border settlement, are yet to fully normalize their relations with one another. Based on the close linkage of politics and economics in the two countries’ respective energy policies, it is plausible to argue that through expansion of their energy cooperation, Japan and Russia should be able to further improve their relations by boosting mutual trust and understanding.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7 Marine and Coastal Commercial Fisheries
    Marine and Coastal Commercial Fisheries CHAPTER 7 MARINE AND COASTAL COMMERCIAL FISHERIES 7.1 INTRODUCTION This supplemental information is provided in order to address specific questions raised following publication of the international style Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in 2003 and as such forms a component of the EIA addendum (EIA-A). In brief, the focus of the questions or requirement for the provision of further information included the following: • Lack of information on fisheries and in particular non-fish species of commercial value; • Information on dredging and disposal and the effects on fish, particularly commercial interests within Aniva Bay; • Potential adverse effects of noise disturbance during construction on marine organisms (fish and shellfish); • Clarification of some issues relating to how compensation to fisherman is provided through the fish damage compensation arrangement. Further information on the above issues is provided in the following sections. Potential effects on fisheries associated with dredging and disposal are covered in EIA Addendum Chapter 12, except with respect to the effects of noise disturbance, which are also covered in this Chapter. The social aspects of the fishing industry and in particular issues relating to subsistence fishing are covered in the Social Impact Assessment (Section 12.3). 7.2 BACKGROUND The fishing industry is of vital economic importance to the Sakhalin economy. It provides employment and livelihoods for the local population on the island, primarily for those who live in coastal areas. According to data from 2001 (SEIC Social Impact Assessment 2003), the fishing industry represents approximately 26.7% of the industrial production volume in the regional economy, 25.4% of the export volume, and 7.6% of total employment.
    [Show full text]
  • THE GOLDEN MOUNTAINS of ALTAI a Treasure of Biodiversity and Culture Publisher: Altai Alliance
    THE GOLDEN MOUNTAINS OF ALTAI A Treasure of Biodiversity and Culture Publisher: Altai Alliance Produced by: Pacific Environment Written by: Jennifer Castner and Pacific Environment Senior Editor and Production Manager: Meerim Kylychbekova Contributors: Chagat Almashev, Matt Foley, Gleb Raygorodetsky, Don Weeden Editors: David Gordon, Leah Zimmerman, Michael Martin Contact: [email protected] Copyright 2009 Cover Photos: Carol Hiltner, World Wildlife Fund, Ashley Tindall (top), Flickrcc/Ilya Schurov (middle), Meerim Kylychbekova (bottom). Design: Design Action Collective THE GOLDEN MOUNTAINS OF ALTAI A Treasure of Biodiversity and Culture 1 THE GOLDEN MOUNTAINS OF ALTAI Introduction Nestled in the Golden Mountains of Altai in south - health, water quality, critical habitat, and the local ern Siberia, the Republic of Altai is a unique blend tourism-based economy. of ancient cultures, stunning landscapes, and extraordinarily high biodiversity. The republic bor - In this paper, we explore why the Altai is a high- ders Mongolia, China, and Kazakhstan, covering priority conservation area, what threats the region 93,000 square kilometers—an area roughly the size faces today, and where the most significant conser - of the state of Indiana. Sacred sites dot the repub - vation opportunities are located. The paper discusses lic’s varied terrain. Its lands include temperate and specific recommendations to engage in and advance boreal forests, dramatic alpine landscapes, rich agri - these conservation opportunities. It focuses on: cultural lands, the wild and scenic Katun River, and • Strengthening cultural and environmental the remote and fragile Ukok Plateau. activism; The republic’s relative isolation and lack of devel - • Promoting alternative energy and green-building opment mean that its landscape and habitats remain technologies; largely intact.
    [Show full text]
  • Oceanographic Features of Laperouse Strait
    Oceanographic features of LaPerouse Strait Mikhail A. DANCHENKOV1, David Aubrey2 and Stephen C. Riser3 1 Far Eastern Regional Hydrometeorological Research Institute, Vladivostok, Russia 2 Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, U.S.A. 3 School of Oceanography, University of Washington, Seattle, U.S.A. Introduction sults of a few current measurements (May–June 1933) in the strait indicate that subtropical water in The Japan and Okhotsk Seas are divided by a shal- summer enters into Soya Strait over almost all its low area located between Sakhalin Island from the width (with the exception of its northern part). Af- north and Hokkaido Island from the south, and ter Soya Strait, the width of this flow sharply de- 142.0°E from the west and 143.5°E from the east creases and further warm and salty water exists (Fig. 1). This area, despite the special bottom to- only in a narrow strip along northern coast of pography and oceanographic conditions, has no Hokkaido. name, but the narrowness between Cape Krilion and Cape Soya has two names: in Russia – Lape- ruza (LaPerouse) Strait, and in Japan – Soya Strait. The main feature of water structure of this area in In this paper the waters of area between the Sakha- summer is a belt of cold water from Krilion Cape lin and Hokkaido islands, 142°E and 143.4°E are to the southeast part of this strait (Fig. 2). considered as a whole, therefore, hereafter we will call this region (for convenience of the descrip- It is usually considered (Tanaka et al., 1996) that cold water inside the belt is formed outside the tion) LaPerouse Strait and its western narrowness strait – at southwestern coast of Sakhalin as the Soya Strait.
    [Show full text]