Preserving the Beasts of Waste and Desolation: Theodore Roosevelt and Predator Control in Yellowstone by Jeremy Johnston

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Preserving the Beasts of Waste and Desolation: Theodore Roosevelt and Predator Control in Yellowstone by Jeremy Johnston Preserving the Beasts of Waste and Desolation: Theodore Roosevelt and Predator Control in Yellowstone By Jeremy Johnston measure and weigh the seal. The early history of wildlife man- Eventually, he obtained the seal’s agement in places like Yellowstone skull, and began a natural history is often assumed to have been collection that would continue to based on a consensus that preda- grow throughout his life. In 1872, tors such as wolves, coyotes, and shortly after the creation of mountain lions should be killed. Yellowstone National Park, Although President Theodore Theodore Roosevelt received a Roosevelt sought to curtail the rifle and taxidermy lessons from slaughter of predators in Yel- his father for his birthday. These lowstone in the early 1900s, his gifts would further his studies in role in park policy is often misin- natural history as well as intro- terpreted, and he has been por- duce the young man to the sport of trayed as both a hero and a villain. hunting. Roosevelt continued to This confusion is the result of not pursue his natural history studies only a divergence of opinions on into his college years, when he ini- predator control, but Roosevelt’s tially sought a degree in natural his- own writings and changing views. In tory before deciding on law as a field his book The Wilderness Hunter, which of study. Despite this change in career detailed his experiences in the Dakota goals, Roosevelt continued to study Badlands during the 1880s, Roosevelt wildlife throughout his life. referred to wolves as “the beasts of Hunting would also play in important waste and desolation.”1 In this same ator population was influenced by sev- role in Theodore Roosevelt’s life, not book, Roosevelt depicted cougars as eral factors, including his goal of estab- just for the collecting of natural speci- “bloodthirsty” and “cowardly” preda- lishing a wildlife reserve in Yellow- mens for study, but for recreational tors with a “desire for bloodshed which stone, his personal interest in hunting, enjoyment as well. Roosevelt best they lack the courage to realize.”2 Yet and his increased understanding of the summed up his feelings towards the despite his depiction of predators as role of predators in an ecosystem. sport of hunting in the preface to The destroyers of cattle and wildlife, Wilderness Hunter: Roosevelt was a careful student of pre- Roosevelt’s Defense of Yellowstone as dators and their natural behavior. As he a Wildlife Sanctuary In hunting, the finding and killing of spent more time studying predators in the game is after all but a part of the their natural setting, his attitudes toward Theodore Roosevelt’s interest in nat- whole. The free, self-reliant, adven- their role in nature began to change, so ural history began at a very early age. At turous life, with its rugged and stal- much so that by 1908 he ordered preda- eight, young Roosevelt viewed a dead wart democracy; the wild surround- tor control of Yellowstone’s cougars be seal in a New York marketplace. “That ings, the grand beauty of the scenery, stopped in order to allow these predator seal filled me with every possible feel- the chance to study the ways and populations to curtail growing elk ing of romance and adventure,” habits of the woodland creatures—all populations. This change in Roosevelt’s Roosevelt later reminisced.3 The young these unite to give the career of the perspective toward Yellowstone’s pred- Roosevelt returned to the market to wilderness hunter its peculiar charm. 14 Yellowstone Science The chase is among the best of all in 1875. Roosevelt wanted Grinnell to to decrease the park’s boundaries, pub- national pastimes; it cultivates that explain some negative remarks he print- licity generated by the Boone and vigorous manliness for the lack of ed in a review of Hunting Trips of a Crockett club created a public outcry to which in a nation, as in an individual, Ranchman, Roosevelt’s first book “save Yellowstone.”6 the possession of no other qualities describing his western adventures. Through his efforts with Grinnell, can possibly atone.4 Grinnell had given the book an overall Roosevelt began to envision the park as favorable review, but noted that a sanctuary and breeding ground for This great interest in hunting and natu- Roosevelt tended to generalize his wildlife. Roosevelt hoped that if the ral history would eventually lead observations of wildlife and had relied park’s wildlife were protected, their Roosevelt into the American West. on some tenuous sources for informa- populations would dramatically Roosevelt first visited the West in tion. During the meeting, Grinnell increase and spread to the surrounding 1883, when he arrived for a bison hunt defended his remarks pertaining to regions. This would ensure the continu- in the Dakota Badlands. After success- Roosevelt’s book, and Roosevelt real- ation of hunting, his favorite pastime, fully completing his hunt, Roosevelt ized the validity of Grinnell’s argu- outside the park’s boundaries. It would invested in a cattle ranch, marking the ments. Along the way, the two men real- also alleviate his fear that as settlement beginning of his close connection with ized their shared interests in hunting increased, the West would become a the West. Roosevelt returned the next and the West and became good friends. series of private game reserves creating year to investigate his ranching opera- Soon after, they founded the Boone and a situation where only the rich could tions and escape the grief and hardship Crockett Club, an organization that, hunt. As his political career progressed caused by the deaths of both his first among other goals, worked to defend to the presidency of the United States, wife, Alice, and his mother. Roosevelt Yellowstone and its wildlife. Using Roosevelt found himself in a position spent several of the following years Forest and Stream as its mouthpiece, where he could achieve these goals by herding cattle and having a number of the Boone and Crockett club criticized micro-managing Yellowstone’s wildlife adventures which included fighting poaching and proposals for railroad policies. drunken assailants and capturing developments within Yellowstone. This thieves who stole his boat. Hunting also publicity helped result in the passage of Roosevelt and Yellowstone’s occupied a great amount of his time the Lacey Act of 1894, which estab- Predators during these years. Roosevelt hunted a lished Yellowstone’s first efficient judi- variety of animals throughout the cial system, making it possible to pun- Although the hunting of many ungu- Badlands and into Wyoming and ish poachers for their illegal activities. late species ended in 1883 by a directive Montana, and continued to spend much The Boone and Crockett club also of the Secretary of the Interior, park of his time at his ranch until the winter stopped efforts to complete a railroad officials continued killing predators of 1886–1887 wiped out most of his through the northern section of Yellow- throughout the end of the 19th century cattle herd. In later years he occasional- stone. When railroad developers wanted and into the early 20th century. Many ly returned to the ranch, using it as a base for hunting excursions and other sightseeing trips. From there, Roosevelt embarked on two trips into Yellowstone National Park in the 1890s. His experi- ences and observations from these trips formed the basis for many of his wildlife management policies in Yel- lowstone National Park.5 Roosevelt’s interest in the American West soon focused on Yellowstone and the threats to its wildlife posed by rail- road development proposals and poach- ing. He became aware of these prob- lems in 1885 when he met with George Bird Grinnell, editor of Forest and Stream, then the leading natural history magazine in North America, and a founder of the Audubon Society. Grinnell had led a campaign to protect Yellowstone’s ungulates from market hunting and commercial development An editorial cartoon’s depiction of Roosevelt’s 1903 Yellowstone visit. Note the ever since his first visit to Yellowstone mountain lion perched outside the window. From the Anaconda Standard. Spring 2002 15 conservationists of the day, including agreed with Roosevelt. After receiving had accompanied Roosevelt on the Roosevelt, believed limiting predation cougar skulls from the hunt, he wrote 1901 cougar hunt, took on the task of would increase ungulate populations, Roosevelt that “your series of skulls organizing the hunt, but one obstacle allowing them to recover from the from Colorado is incomparably the after another confounded his plans. results of the intensive market hunting largest, most complete, and most valu- First, Goff was wounded by an over- that occurred in the park before the ban able series ever brought together from eager tourist he was guiding on a hunt. on hunting.7 any single locality, and will be of ines- Roosevelt expressed his frustration to Roosevelt’s support of predator con- timable value in determining the Stewart in a letter, “I hope he beat the trol was not just the result of an altruis- amount of individual variation.”11 The ‘tourist’ who inflicted the wound tic conservationist urge. His own desire 1901 hunt not only provided specimens severely.”13 Goff recovered rapidly, and to hunt cougars in Yellowstone was also for classification; Roosevelt gained a promised enough cougar to keep a factor. On December 17, 1901, better understanding of the predation Roosevelt satisfied, but on January 22, Roosevelt wrote to Yellowstone’s acting habits of cougars, learned about their 1903, Roosevelt wrote Stewart to cancel superintendent, Major John Pitcher, diet by examining stomach contents, the hunt. “Many things are conspiring asking “what is the practice about and dispelled the myth of cougars being to make it unlikely that I can go,” he killing mountain lions? If I get into the man-killers.
Recommended publications
  • Oil and Gas Industry Investments in the National Rifle Association and Safari Club International Reshaping American Energy, Land, and Wildlife Policy
    JOE RIIS JOE Oil and Gas Industry Investments in the National Rifle Association and Safari Club International Reshaping American Energy, Land, and Wildlife Policy By Matt Lee-Ashley April 2014 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Oil and Gas Industry Investments in the National Rifle Association and Safari Club International Reshaping American Energy, Land, and Wildlife Policy By Matt Lee-Ashley April 2014 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 3 Oil and gas industry investments in three major sportsmen groups 5 Safari Club International 9 The National Rifle Association 11 Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation 13 Impact of influence: How the oil and gas industry’s investments are paying off 14 Threats to endangered and threatened wildlife in oil- and gas-producing regions 19 Threats to the backcountry 22 Threats to public access and ownership 25 Conclusion 27 About the author and acknowledgments 28 Endnotes Introduction and summary Two bedrock principles have guided the work and advocacy of American sports- men for more than a century. First, under the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation, wildlife in the United States is considered a public good to be conserved for everyone and accessible to everyone, not a commodity that can be bought and owned by the highest bidder.1 Second, since President Theodore Roosevelt’s creation of the first wildlife refuges and national forests, sportsmen have fought to protect wildlife habitat from development and fragmentation to ensure healthy game supplies. These two principles, however, are coming under growing fire from an aggressive and coordinated campaign funded by the oil and gas industry. As part of a major effort since 2008 to bolster its lobbying and political power, the oil and gas industry has steadily expanded its contributions and influ- ence over several major conservative sportsmen’s organizations, including Safari Club International, or SCI, the National Rifle Association, or NRA, and the Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • A Timeline of Significant Events in the Development of North American Mammalogy
    SpecialSpecial PublicationsPublications MuseumMuseum ofof TexasTexas TechTech UniversityUniversity NumberNumber xx66 21 Novemberxx XXXX 20102017 A Timeline of SignificantTitle Events in the Development of North American Mammalogy Molecular Biology Structural Biology Biochemistry Microbiology Genomics Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Computer Science Statistics Physical Chemistry Information Technology Mathematics David J. Schmidly, Robert D. Bradley, Lisa C. Bradley, and Richard D. Stevens Front cover: This figure depicts a chronological presentation of some of the significant events, technological breakthroughs, and iconic personalities in the history of North American mammalogy. Red lines and arrows depict the chronological flow (i.e., top row – read left to right, middle row – read right to left, and third row – read left to right). See text and tables for expanded interpretation of the importance of each person or event. Top row: The first three panels (from left) are associated with the time period entitled “The Emergence Phase (16th‒18th Centuries)” – Mark Catesby’s 1748 map of Carolina, Florida, and the Bahama Islands, Thomas Jefferson, and Charles Willson Peale; the next two panels represent “The Discovery Phase (19th Century)” – Spencer Fullerton Baird and C. Hart Merriam. Middle row: The first two panels (from right) represent “The Natural History Phase (1901‒1960)” – Joseph Grinnell and E. Raymond Hall; the next three panels (from right) depict “The Theoretical and Technological Phase (1961‒2000)” – illustration of Robert H. MacArthur and Edward O. Wilson’s theory of island biogeography, karyogram depicting g-banded chromosomes, and photograph of electrophoretic mobility of proteins from an allozyme analysis. Bottom row: These four panels (from left) represent the “Big Data Phase (2001‒present)” – chromatogram illustrating a DNA sequence, bioinformatics and computational biology, phylogenetic tree of mammals, and storage banks for a supercomputer.
    [Show full text]
  • The Boone and Crockett Club on Fair Chase 9/5/2016
    THE BOONE AND CROCKETT CLUB ON FAIR CHASE 9/5/2016 Why a Discussion on Fair Chase? All significant human activities are conducted under a set of ethical principles that guide appropriate behavior. Depending on the activity, these principles are molded into laws when specific behavior is required. Without ethics and laws, most activities would become unsafe and unacceptable to both those who participate in them and those who do not. Hunting is no different. It, too, has principles and laws that guide ethical behavior. In modern, devel- oped societies, there exists a general expectation that hunting be conducted under appropriate conditions—animals are taken for legitimate purposes such as food, to attain wildlife agency management goals, and to mitigate property damage. It is also expected that the hunting is done sustainably and legally, and that hunters conduct themselves ethically by showing respect for the land and animals they hunt. In the broadest sense, hunters are guided by a conservation ethic, but the most common term used to describe the actual ethical pursuit of a big game animal is “fair chase.” The concept of fair chase has been widely promoted for over a century by the Boone and Crockett Club, an organi- zation founded by Theodore Roosevelt in 1887 to work towards saving what was left of dwindling North American wildlife populations. The Club defines fair chase as “the ethical, sportsmanlike, and lawful pursuit and taking of any free-ranging wild, native North American big game animal in a manner that does not give the hunter an improper advantage over such animals.” Fair chase has become a code of conduct for the American sportsman, helped shape the foundation of many of our game laws, and is taught to new hunters as they complete mandatory certification courses.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Updated: 1/4/2019 2:21 PM
    1 HISTORICAL FILES, Subject and Biographical A – Miscellaneous Abert, James Actors and Actresses Adair, John Adams Papers Adams, Daniel (Mrs.) Adkins, Betty Lawrence African American Genealogy African American History African Americans African Americans – Indiana African Americans – Kentucky African Americans – Louisville Ahrens, Theo (Jr.) Ainslie, Hew Alexander, Barton Stone Ali, Muhammad Allensworth, Allen Allison, John S. Allison, Young E. - Jr. & Sr. Almanacs Altsheller, Brent Alves, Bernard P. American Heritage American Letter Express Co. American Literary Manuscripts American Revolution American Revolution - Anecdotes American Revolution - Soldiers Amish - Indiana Anderson, Alex F. (Ship - Caroline) Anderson, James B. Anderson, Mary Anderson, Richard Clough Anderson, Robert Anderson, William Marshall Anderson, William P. Updated: 1/4/2019 2:21 PM 2 Andressohn, John C. Andrew's Raid (James J. Andrews) Antiques - Kentucky Antiquities - Kentucky Appalachia Applegate, Elisha Archaeology - Kentucky Architecture and Architects Architecture and Architects – McDonald Bros. Archival Symposium - Louisville (1970) Archivists and Archives Administration Ardery, Julia Spencer (Mrs. W. B.) Ark and Dove Arnold, Jeremiah Arthur Kling Center Asbury, Francis Ashby, Turner (Gen.) Ashland, KY Athletes Atkinson, Henry (Gen.) Audubon State Park (Henderson, KY) Augusta, KY Authors - KY Authors - KY - Allen, James Lane Authors - KY - Cawein, Madison Authors - KY - Creason, Joe Authors - KY - McClellan, G. M. Authors - KY - Merton, Thomas Authors - KY - Rice, Alice Authors - KY - Rice, Cale Authors - KY - Roberts, Elizabeth Madox Authors - KY - Sea, Sophie F. Authors - KY - Spears, W. Authors - KY - Still, James Authors - KY - Stober, George Authors - KY - Stuart, Jesse Authors - KY - Sulzer, Elmer G. Authors - KY - Warren, Robert Penn Authors - Louisville Auto License Automobiles Updated: 1/4/2019 2:21 PM 3 Awards B – Miscellaneous Bacon, Nathaniel Badin, Theodore (Rev.) Bakeless, John Baker, James G.
    [Show full text]
  • 6.0 Consultation and Coordination
    Chokecherry and Sierra Madre Final EIS Chapter 6.0 – Consultation and Coordination 6-1 6.0 Consultation and Coordination This EIS was conducted in accordance with NEPA requirements, CEQ regulations, and the DOI and BLM policies and procedures implementing NEPA. NEPA and the associated laws, regulations, and policies require the BLM to seek public involvement early in, and throughout, the planning process to develop a reasonable range of alternatives to PCW’s Proposed Action and prepare environmental documents that disclose the potential impacts of alternatives considered. Public involvement and agency consultation and coordination, which have been at the heart of the process leading to this draft EIS, were achieved through FR notices, public and informal meetings, individual contacts, media releases, and the project website. From the initial proposal of the project, the public and agencies have been approached for input on the project scope and development, as discussed in Chapter 1.0. This chapter describes this public involvement process as well as other key consultation and coordination. 6.1 Agency Participation and Coordination Specific regulations require the BLM to coordinate and consult with federal, state, and local agencies about the potential of the project and alternatives to affect sensitive environmental and human resources. The BLM initiated these coordination and consultation activities through the scoping process and has maintained them through regular meetings regarding key topics (e.g., alternatives and impact analyses)
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University the Graduate School the College
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School The College of the Liberal Arts ANIMALS, TECHNOLOGY, AND THE ZOOPOETICS OF AMERICAN MODERNISM A Dissertation in English by Christopher T. White 2008 Christopher T. White Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2008 ii The dissertation of Christopher T. White was reviewed and approved* by the following: Sanford Schwartz Associate Professor of English Thesis Advisor Chair of Committee Deborah Clarke Professor of English and Women’s Studies Mark Morrisson Associate Professor of English Susan Squier Brill Professor of Women’s Studies and English Philip Jenkins Sparks Professor of History and Religious Studies Robin Schulze Professor of English Head of the Department of English *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii Abstract This dissertation addresses a striking paradox of American modernity: the historical disappearance of wildlife from the natural environment and the simultaneous proliferation of animal forms across the cultural landscape—in literature, in visual and material culture, and in popular scientific writings during the half-century of dramatic change from 1890 to 1940. Across these venues the figure of the “vanishing animal” emerges as a dominant trope, as modern extinctions and the explosion of machine culture combine to frame animals within a spectral logic—disappearing, but more visible than ever. The first half of this dissertation examines the extensive technological, ideological, and representational apparatus through which animals and animal life are rendered in modern American culture, while the second half explores a significant, if surprising, correlative phenomenon whereby the modernized figure of the animal returns to haunt, and in fact disrupt, the very technics that facilitated its emergence in the first place.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inventory of the Theodore Roosevelt Collection #560
    The Inventory of the Theodore Roosevelt Collection #560 Howard Gotlieb Archival Research Center ROOSEVELT, THEODORE 1858-1919 Gift of Paul C. Richards, 1976-1990; 1993 Note: Items found in Richards-Roosevelt Room Case are identified as such with the notation ‘[Richards-Roosevelt Room]’. Boxes 1-12 I. Correspondence Correspondence is listed alphabetically but filed chronologically in Boxes 1-11 as noted below. Material filed in Box 12 is noted as such with the notation “(Box 12)”. Box 1 Undated materials and 1881-1893 Box 2 1894-1897 Box 3 1898-1900 Box 4 1901-1903 Box 5 1904-1905 Box 6 1906-1907 Box 7 1908-1909 Box 8 1910 Box 9 1911-1912 Box 10 1913-1915 Box 11 1916-1918 Box 12 TR’s Family’s Personal and Business Correspondence, and letters about TR post- January 6th, 1919 (TR’s death). A. From TR Abbott, Ernest H[amlin] TLS, Feb. 3, 1915 (New York), 1 p. Abbott, Lawrence F[raser] TLS, July 14, 1908 (Oyster Bay), 2 p. ALS, Dec. 2, 1909 (on safari), 4 p. TLS, May 4, 1916 (Oyster Bay), 1 p. TLS, March 15, 1917 (Oyster Bay), 1 p. Abbott, Rev. Dr. Lyman TLS, June 19, 1903 (Washington, D.C.), 1 p. TLS, Nov. 21, 1904 (Washington, D.C.), 1 p. TLS, Feb. 15, 1909 (Washington, D.C.), 2 p. Aberdeen, Lady ALS, Jan. 14, 1918 (Oyster Bay), 2 p. Ackerman, Ernest R. TLS, Nov. 1, 1907 (Washington, D.C.), 1 p. Addison, James T[hayer] TLS, Dec. 7, 1915 (Oyster Bay), 1p. Adee, Alvey A[ugustus] TLS, Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Aid to the Clinton Hart Merriam Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8j67k98 No online items Finding aid to the Clinton Hart Merriam papers Finding aid created by Museum of Vertebrate Zoology staff using RecordEXPRESS UC Berkeley. Museum of Vertebrate Zoology 3101 Valley Life Sciences Bldg, #3160 University of California Berkeley Berkeley, California 94720-3160 (510) 642-3567 [email protected] http://mvz.berkeley.edu/ 2014 Finding aid to the Clinton Hart MVZA.MSS.0281 1 Merriam papers Descriptive Summary Title: Finding aid to the Clinton Hart Merriam papers Dates: 1822-1939 Collection Number: MVZA.MSS.0281 Creator/Collector: Merriam, C. Hart (Clinton Hart), 1855-1942University of California (1868-1952). Museum of Vertebrate Zoology Extent: 1.8 linear feet Repository: UC Berkeley. Museum of Vertebrate Zoology Berkeley, California 94720-3160 Abstract: The Clinton Hart Merriam papers include correspondence, manuscripts, illustrations, photographs, and reprints of articles. Materials span the years 1822-1939. Language of Material: English Access The collection is open for research. Publication Rights Copyright restrictions may apply. All requests to publish, quote, or reproduce must be submitted to the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology Archives in writing for approval. Please contact the Museum Archivist for further information. Preferred Citation Finding aid to the Clinton Hart Merriam papers. UC Berkeley. Museum of Vertebrate Zoology Biography/Administrative History Clinton Hart Merriam (1855-1942) was born in New York City. He studied at Yale’s Sheffield Scientific School and graduated from the College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, in 1879. After graduating, he practiced medicine and surgery in upstate New York. However, eventually he became mainly interested in natural history and helped put into motion numerous important field expeditions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Boone and Crockett Club on Conservation and Preservation
    THE BOONE AND CROCKETT CLUB ON CONSERVATION AND PRESERVATION Why a Discussion of Conservation and Preservation More people are engaging in and having a greater influence on natural resource issues than ever before through voter initiatives, public forums, and social media. They want to do what is best, yet are not necessarily familiar with the two primary approaches by which natural resources are managed— conservation and preservation. Conservation and preservation are terms everyone has heard of, but for many people they remain loosely defined and not well understood. There is a growing belief that “letting nature take its course” with no human interference is the best philosophy for the treatment of natural resources. Many are mistakenly or intentionally calling this way of thinking conservation, though it is more closely aligned with preservation. These misconceptions are helping to shift the management of natural resources from a successful “hands-on” conservation approach to a “hands-off” preservation approach, which is proving to have serious negative implications. Conservation and preservation are both concerned with protection and betterment of the environment, but they are based on different philosophies that produce different results. Conservation focuses on using and managing natural resources to benefit people, but in keeping within the limits of supply, regrowth, and change, both natural and human-influenced. It is the most widely used and accepted model for the management of natural resources, including wildlife, in North America. Preservation is a philosophy that generally views people as a negative influence on nature, and seeks to keep natural resources in a pristine state by limiting use and excluding active management by people.
    [Show full text]
  • In Memoriam: Clinton Hart Merriam
    130 LVol.[ Auk• IN MEMORIAM: CLINTON HART MERRIAM BY T. S. PALMER CLINTONHART MERRIAM,son of Clinton Levi and Mary Hart Mer- riam, a Founder, Secretary, Treasurer, Councillor, past President, and Patron of the American Ornithologists' Union, died in Berkeley, California, March 19, 1942, at the age of 86. Twenty years of his life were spent in education and preparation for his life work, 4 in the practice of medicine, 25 in public service, and nearly 32 in retirement. Although well past fourscore years, he constantly lamented that life was too short. He was, in fact, a human dynamo of energy and progressedrapidly from one field to another in his knowledge and interests. He was the eldest of a family of three children and was born in New York City, December 5, 1855, was educated by private tutors, and in 1872 was appointed naturalist of the Hayden Survey of Yellow- stone Park. He was a student at the Sheffield Scientific School at Yale and graduatedfrom the Collegeof Physiciansand Surgeonsin New York in 1879. Among his classmateswere A. K. Fisher, who soon gave up medicine for ornithology, and E. A. Mearns, the only one of the group who as an Army surgeoncontinued in the practice of his profession. While still a medical student he joined with others in founding the Linnaean Society of New York and was elected its first president. During the next few years he practiced medicine in Locust Grove, N.Y., and later made a trip to the Newfoundland sealing grounds as surgeon on the U.S. Fish CommissionSteamer "Proteus." In 1883 when the American Ornithologists' Union was organized, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating 125 Years of the U.S. Geological Survey
    Celebrating 125 Years of the U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1274 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Celebrating 125 Years of the U.S. Geological Survey Compiled by Kathleen K. Gohn Circular 1274 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2004 Free on application to U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Gohn, Kathleen K., comp., 2004, Celebrating 125 years of the U.S. Geological Survey : U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1274, 56 p. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data 2001051109 ISBN 0-607-86197-5 iii Message from the Today, the USGS continues respond as new environmental to map, measure, and monitor challenges and concerns emerge Director our land and its resources and and to seize new enhancements to conduct research that builds to information technology that In the 125 years since its fundamental knowledge about make producing and present- creation, the U.S. Geological the Earth, its resources, and its ing our science both easier and Survey (USGS) has provided processes, contributing relevant faster.
    [Show full text]
  • George Bird and Elizabeth Curtis Grinnell Photograph Collection
    George Bird and Elizabeth Curtis Grinnell photograph collection 2011 National Museum of the American Indian 4220 Silver Hill Rd Suitland 20746-2863 [email protected] http://nmai.si.edu/explore/collections/archive/ Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Biographical/Historical note.............................................................................................. 1 Arrangement note............................................................................................................ 2 Location of Other Archival Materials Note....................................................................... 2 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 2 George Bird and Elizabeth Curtis Grinnell photograph collection NMAI.AC.140 Collection Overview Repository: National Museum of the American Indian Title: George Bird and Elizabeth Curtis Grinnell photograph collection Identifier: NMAI.AC.140 Date: 1902-1910 Creator: Tuell, Julia E. Grinnell, George Bird, 1849-1938 Extent: 119 Negatives (photographic) (119 glass plate negatives; black and white; 7 x 9 in.) Language: English . Summary: The core of this photographic collection (1902-1904) was taken during Grinnell's visits among the Northern (Montana, Rosebud County and Rosebud River,
    [Show full text]