DOCSLIB.ORG

Hurricane Matthew Executive Summary Matthew Is Maintaining Major Hurricane Status As It Tracks North Through the Greater Antilles

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hurricane Matthew Executive Summary Matthew Is Maintaining Major Hurricane Status As It Tracks North Through the Greater Antilles eVENT Willis Research Network Hurricane Commentary Hurricane Matthew Executive Summary Matthew is maintaining major hurricane status as it tracks north through the Greater Antilles. A line of thunderstorms thrown out ahead of the storm heralded Matthew’s arrival last night in the Greater Antilles. Ingredients will be in place for Matthew to maintain major hurricane status as it continues north. Hurricane impacts are possible anywhere from Florida to Maine and interests along the U.S. East Coast should monitor developments. Date/Time 5:00 p.m. EDT Oct 3, 2016 Location 16.3N, 74.7W Windspeed/Pressure 140mph, 940mb (Cat 4) Speed/Direction 7mph N Forecast Summary Matthew’s rapid intensification over the weekend caught many by surprise, and ended a nine-year stretch since the previous Category 5 North Atlantic hurricane - Felix in 2007. Although hinted at by some forecast models, explosive deepening was considered an outside possibility. Was it caused by the unusual clump of thunderstorms to the east of Matthew, or was it the moisture-laden environment, or perhaps Matthew’s small eye? Whatever the cause, Matthew is now an established major hurricane with little prospect of significant weakening in the next 3 days. Matthew slowed to a crawl over the weekend, as expected, and lingered over very warm ocean waters that extended to great depth. The long-awaited turn to the north began on Sunday and the storm is now accelerating through the Greater Antilles. Immediate impacts on Haiti are likely to be catastrophic. Haiti only rarely experiences the full force of a northward moving hurricane, with near-record rains expected on south-facing mountain slopes and sustained hurricane force winds. Impacts are also likely to be significant in Jamaica and Cuba. The Bahamas may experience major hurricane impacts if Matthew survives the mountainous islands intact, as expected. Even if weakened, the ingredients of warm oceans, light wind shear and moist air are in place for re-strengthening. The most recent forecasts call for sustained category 3 or 4 intensity over the next 3 days at least (Figure 2). Some temporary relief may come through an eye- wall replacement cycle. But these cycles are incredibly difficult to predict. Beyond Bermuda, conditions will continue to support a strong hurricane. The latest forecast models have shifted west, increasing the chance of a U.S. landfall between South Florida and North Carolina. The fact that independent forecast centers have all shifted west suggests confidence in this shift, but new forecasts will need careful watch to establish whether this is a temporary change. The further north a potential landfall, the greater chance of Matthew weakening through cooler ocean temperatures and increased shear. However, the area of damaging winds will expand as Matthew tracks north. Hurricane impacts are possible anywhere from Florida to Maine and interests along the U.S. East Coast should monitor developments. Additional commentaries will be issued as the hurricane forecasts align on the likely scenario. © Copyright 2016 Willis Limited / Willis Re Inc. All rights reserved: No part of this publication may be reproduced, disseminated, distributed, stored in a retrieval system, transmitted or otherwise transferred in any form or by any means, whether electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the permission of Willis Limited / Willis Re Inc. Some information contained in this document may be compiled from third party sources and we do not guarantee and are not responsible for the accuracy of such. This document is for general information only and is not intended to be relied upon. Any action based on or in connection with anything contained herein should be taken only after obtaining specific advice from independent professional advisors of your choice. The views expressed in this document are not necessarily those of Willis Limited / Willis Re Inc., its parent companies, sister companies, subsidiaries or affiliates, Willis Towers Watson PLC and all member companies thereof (hereinafter “Willis Towers Watson”). Willis Towers Watson is not responsible for the accuracy or completeness of the contents herein and expressly disclaims any responsibility or liability for the reader's application of any of the contents herein to any analysis or other matter, or for any results or conclusions based upon, arising from or in connection with the contents herein, nor do the contents herein guarantee, and should not be construed to guarantee, any particular result or outcome. Willis Towers Watson accepts no responsibility for the content or quality of any third party websites to which we refer. Figure 2: Model forecast tracks (left) and intensity (right) for Tropical Storm Matthew at 2000UTC 10/03/16 (NCAR/TCGP). For real-time updated forecasts, please visit: http://www.ral.ucar.edu/hurricanes/realtime/current/ For further information please contact Dr James Done Roy Cloutier Project Scientist and Willis Research Fellow Catastrophe Analytics National Center for Atmospheric Research Earth System Laboratory Willis Re Inc. P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307 7760France Avenue South Suite 450 Minneapolis, MN 55435 Tel: +1 (303) 497-8209 Tel: +1 (952) 841-6652 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Website: http://staff.ucar.edu/users/done Website: http://www.willisresearchnetwork.com/ The contents herein are provided for informational purposes only and do not constitute and should not be construed as professional advice. Any and all examples used herein are for illustrative purposes only, are purely hypothetical in nature, and offered merely to describe concepts or ideas. They are not offered as solutions to produce specific results and are not to be relied upon. The reader is cautioned to consult independent professional advisors of his/her choice and formulate independent conclusions and opinions regarding the subject matter discussed herein. Willis Towers Watson is not responsible for the accuracy or completeness of the contents herein and expressly disclaims any responsibility or liability for the reader's application of any of the contents herein to any analysis or other matter, nor do the contents herein guarantee, and should not be construed to guarantee, any particular result or outcome.2 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2014 New York Hazard Mitigation Plan Hurricane Section 3.12: HURRICANE (Tropical/ Coastal Storms/ Nor’Easter)
    2014 New York Hazard Mitigation Plan Hurricane Section 3.12: HURRICANE (Tropical/ Coastal Storms/ Nor’easter) 2014 SHMP Update Reformatted 2011 Mitigation Plan into 2014 Update outline Added Tropical Storms, Coastal Storms, & Nor’easter hazards to Hurricane Profile Added new key terms to 2011 Mitigation Plan’s list of terms Updated past hurricane occurrences section Inserted Events and Losses table Inserted new Hurricane Events and Property Losses maps Added information on New York Bight Added active State development projects 3.12.1 Hurricane (Tropical/ Coastal Storms/ Nor’easters) Profile Coastal storms, including Nor’easters, tropical storms, and hurricanes can, either directly or indirectly, impact all of New York State. More densely populated and developed coastal areas, such as New York City, are the most vulnerable to hurricane-related damages. Before a storm is classified a hurricane, it must pass through four distinct stages: tropical disturbance, tropical depression, tropical storm and lastly a hurricane. Figure 3.12a: Four Stages of a Hurricane Tropical Disturbance (Stage 1) Tropical Hurricane Depression (Stage 4) (Stage 2) Tropical Storm (Stage 3) 3.12-1 Final Release Date January 4, 2014 2014 New York Hazard Mitigation Plan Hurricane Characteristics Below are some key terms to review relating to hurricanes, tropical storms, coastal storms and nor’easters: Hazard Key Terms and Definition Nor’easter- An intense storm that can cause heavy rain and snow, strong winds, and coastal flooding. Nor’easters have cold, low barometric
    [Show full text]
  • Felix Hits Nicaragua and Honduras, Then Diminishes to Tropical Storm
    - Advertisement - Felix hits Nicaragua and Honduras, then diminishes to tropical storm September 5, 2007 Hurricane Felix, which reached Category 5 status and slammed into the Nicaragua-Honduras border Sept. 4, was reduced to a fast-moving tropical storm over eastern Guatemala. The storm broke up and lost strength as it hit the Honduran mountains, according to Martin Maldonado of Miami-based Team Produce International Inc. Ed Loyd, manager of investor relations and corporate communications for Chiquita Brands International in Cincinnati, said Sept. 5, "It's a little early for us to know what potential impact Hurricane Felix will have. We do have a number of farms in northern Honduras and Guatemala, and we also source from independent growers in southern Guatemala." These banana production areas "may be impacted by winds and rains. It is hard to predict." The speed of the storm is a key factor in the amount of damage, Mr. Loyd said. In 1998, Hurricane Mitch lingered for a week over Central America. That flooding dropped as much as four feet of rain on some parts of Honduras. Thus, news reports Sept. 5 that the storm was moving quickly were likely good news for produce grower-exporters in northern Central America. Mr. Loyd said that Chiquita would release more complete information about the status of its Central American banana crop around Sept. 10. Speaking from his Houston sales office, Guatemalan grower-exporter Antonio Maldonado said late in the afternoon of Sept. 5 that he was very thankful that Felix's ferocity had diminished to a tropical storm. Many Guatemalans spent the two days before the storm stocking up on supplies in preparation for the hurricane, "but now they're very tranquil," he said.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded 10/01/21 04:51 PM UTC JULY 2003 ANNUAL SUMMARY 1455
    1454 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW VOLUME 131 ANNUAL SUMMARY Atlantic Hurricane Season of 2001 JOHN L. BEVEN II, STACY R. STEWART,MILES B. LAWRENCE,LIXION A. AVILA,JAMES L. FRANKLIN, AND RICHARD J. PASCH NOAA/NWS/Tropical Prediction Center/National Hurricane Center, Miami, Florida (Manuscript received 19 July 2002, in ®nal form 9 December 2002) ABSTRACT Activity during the 2001 hurricane season was similar to that of the 2000 season. Fifteen tropical storms developed, with nine becoming hurricanes and four major hurricanes. Two tropical depressions failed to become tropical storms. Similarities to the 2000 season include overall activity much above climatological levels and most of the cyclones occurring over the open Atlantic north of 258N. The overall ``lateness'' of the season was notable, with 11 named storms, including all the hurricanes, forming after 1 September. There were no hurricane landfalls in the United States for the second year in a row. However, the season's tropical cyclones were responsible for 93 deaths, including 41 from Tropical Storm Allison in the United States, and 48 from Hurricanes Iris and Michelle in the Caribbean. 1. Overview of the 2001 season cycleÐsimultaneously exhibiting characteristics of both tropical and extratropical cyclones (Hebert 1973). The National Hurricane Center (NHC) tracked 15 No hurricanes struck the United States during 2001. tropical cyclones (TCs) that achieved tropical storm or The season thus joins the 2000, 1990, and 1951 seasons hurricane strength in the Atlantic basin during 2001 as years in which eight or more hurricanes occurred (Table 1). Nine of these became hurricanes and four without a U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Converting Between Various Wind Averaging Periods in Tropical Cyclone Conditions
    GUIDELINES FOR CONVERTING BETWEEN VARIOUS WIND AVERAGING PERIODS IN TROPICAL CYCLONE CONDITIONS For more information, please contact: World Meteorological Organization Communications and Public Affairs Office Tel.: +41 (0) 22 730 83 14 – Fax: +41 (0) 22 730 80 27 E-mail: [email protected] Tropical Cyclone Programme Weather and Disaster Risk Reduction Services Department Tel.: +41 (0) 22 730 84 53 – Fax: +41 (0) 22 730 81 28 E-mail: [email protected] 7 bis, avenue de la Paix – P.O. Box 2300 – CH 1211 Geneva 2 – Switzerland www.wmo.int D-WDS_101692 WMO/TD-No. 1555 GUIDELINES FOR CONVERTING BETWEEN VARIOUS WIND AVERAGING PERIODS IN TROPICAL CYCLONE CONDITIONS by B. A. Harper1, J. D. Kepert2 and J. D. Ginger3 August 2010 1BE (Hons), PhD (James Cook), Systems Engineering Australia Pty Ltd, Brisbane, Australia. 2BSc (Hons) (Western Australia), MSc, PhD (Monash), Bureau of Meteorology, Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research, Melbourne, Australia. 3BSc Eng (Peradeniya-Sri Lanka), MEngSc (Monash), PhD (Queensland), Cyclone Testing Station, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia. © World Meteorological Organization, 2010 The right of publication in print, electronic and any other form and in any language is reserved by WMO. Short extracts from WMO publications may be reproduced without authorization, provided that the complete source is clearly indicated. Editorial correspondence and requests to publish, reproduce or translate these publication in part or in whole should be addressed to: Chairperson, Publications Board World Meteorological Organization (WMO) 7 bis, avenue de la Paix Tel.: +41 (0) 22 730 84 03 P.O. Box 2300 Fax: +41 (0) 22 730 80 40 CH-1211 Geneva 2, Switzerland E-mail: [email protected] NOTE The designations employed in WMO publications and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of WMO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • 62Nd Book Cover.Cdr:Coreldraw
    62nd Interdepartmental Hurricane Conference Theme: Tropical Cyclone Operations and Research: Priorities for the Future AGENDA Monday, March 3, 2008 9:00 AM Early Registration (9:00 AM-12:30 PM) Opening Session 12:30 PM Conference Opening Mr. Samuel P. Williamson Federal Coordinator for Meteorology 12:35 PM Introduction of Mayor Mr. Howard Chapman Executive Director, Charleston Area Regional Transportation Authority 12:40 PM Welcome/Opening Remarks The Honorable Joseph P. Riley, Jr. Mayor, Charleston, South Carolina 12:55 PM Introductory Comments Mr. Samuel P. Williamson Federal Coordinator for Meteorology 1:15 PM Keynote Address Ms. Mary M. Glackin Deputy Under Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere (NOAA) 1:30 PM Panel Introduction Mr. Samuel P. Williamson Federal Coordinator for Meteorology 1:35 PM Panel: Priorities for Tropical Cyclone Research: A Senior Leader Perspective Moderator: Dr. Elbert W. (Joe) Friday, Professor Emeritus, University of Oklahoma Panelists: Dr. Alexander “Sandy” MacDonald, Deputy Assistant Administrator for NOAA Research Laboratories and Cooperative Institutes Mr. Robert Winokur, Technical Director, Office of the Oceanographer and Navigator of the Navy Dr. Jack Kaye, Associate Director for Research, Earth Science Division, NASA Dr. Fred Lewis, Air Force Director of Weather RDML (sel) David Titley, Commander, Naval Meteorology and Oceanography Command Dr. John “Jack” Hayes, Assistant Administrator for Weather Services, NOAA 3:00 PM Introduction of Federal Agency Lead Mr. Samuel P. Williamson Representatives Federal Coordinator for Meteorology 3:15 PM Afternoon Coffee/Soda Break (3:15-3:45 PM) 1 Session 1 Coordinator: Mr. Mark Welshinger (OFCM) Session 1: The 2007 Tropical Cyclone Season in Review Session Leaders Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Disasters in Latin America and the Caribbean
    NATURAL DISASTERS IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN 2000 - 2019 1 Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) is the second most disaster-prone region in the world 152 million affected by 1,205 disasters (2000-2019)* Floods are the most common disaster in the region. Brazil ranks among the 15 548 On 12 occasions since 2000, floods in the region have caused more than FLOODS S1 in total damages. An average of 17 23 C 5 (2000-2019). The 2017 hurricane season is the thir ecord in terms of number of disasters and countries affected as well as the magnitude of damage. 330 In 2019, Hurricane Dorian became the str A on STORMS record to directly impact a landmass. 25 per cent of earthquakes magnitude 8.0 or higher hav S America Since 2000, there have been 20 -70 thquakes 75 in the region The 2010 Haiti earthquake ranks among the top 10 EARTHQUAKES earthquak ory. Drought is the disaster which affects the highest number of people in the region. Crop yield reductions of 50-75 per cent in central and eastern Guatemala, southern Honduras, eastern El Salvador and parts of Nicaragua. 74 In these countries (known as the Dry Corridor), 8 10 in the DROUGHTS communities most affected by drought resort to crisis coping mechanisms. 66 50 38 24 EXTREME VOLCANIC LANDSLIDES TEMPERATURE EVENTS WILDFIRES * All data on number of occurrences of natural disasters, people affected, injuries and total damages are from CRED ME-DAT, unless otherwise specified. 2 Cyclical Nature of Disasters Although many hazards are cyclical in nature, the hazards most likely to trigger a major humanitarian response in the region are sudden onset hazards such as earthquakes, hurricanes and flash floods.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircurrents Novel Tools for Modeling Tropical Cyclone Risk in the Caribbean and Central America
    AIRCURRENTS NOVEL TOOLS FOR MODELING TROPICAL CYCLONE RISK IN THE CARIBBEAN AND CENTRAL AMERICA By Tim Doggett, Ph.D., and Mr. Scott Stransky 08.2011 Edited by Meagan Phelan INTRODUCTION This article provides an overview of tropical cyclone risk in If a tropical cyclone has only weak winds and does not come the Caribbean and Central America, with a focus on tropical ashore, can it still cause notable insured losses to exposure cyclone-induced flooding, which can be a significant driver nearby? In the Caribbean and Central America, the answer of loss. is yes—primarily as a result of the precipitation hazard associated with tropical cyclones, even those with relatively TROPICAL CYCLONE CLIMATOLOGY IN THE CARIBBEAN AND CENTRAL AMERICA weak winds. Within the North Atlantic basin, roughly eleven tropical cyclones are spawned each year on average, six of which Indeed, the often-held view that flood-dominated tropical become hurricanes. Of all the landmasses in the basin, cyclones always result in lower insured losses than their the Caribbean islands experience the greatest number of windier counterparts requires a hard look; “wet” storms can storms—and often the most intense. That said, some island significantly impact a company’s portfolio. 1979’s Hurricane countries and territories within the Caribbean are more at David in the Caribbean, from which more than 50% of risk than others; in general, risk increases south to north, losses were flood-related—and which AIR estimates would such that the Bahamas is perhaps the most at-risk country in cause USD 6.0 billion in insured losses if it were to recur the Caribbean today.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper-Ocean Temperature Response to Hurricane Felix As Measured by the Bermuda Testbed Mooring
    MAY 1998 DICKEY ET AL. 1195 Upper-Ocean Temperature Response to Hurricane Felix as Measured by the Bermuda Testbed Mooring TOMMY DICKEY,* DAN FRYE,1 JOE MCNEIL,* DEREK MANOV,* NORM NELSON,# DAVID SIGURDSON,* HANS JANNASCH,@ DAVID SIEGEL,* TONY MICHAELS,# AND ROD JOHNSON# *Institute for Computational Earth System Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 1Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts #Bermuda Biological Station for Research, St. George's, Bermuda @Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Monterey, California (Manuscript received 3 September 1996, in ®nal form 18 March 1997) ABSTRACT Hurricane Felix passed over the Bermuda testbed mooring on 15 August 1995, providing a unique opportunity to observe the response of the upper ocean to a hurricane. In the vicinity of Bermuda, Felix was a particularly large hurricane with hurricane-force winds over a diameter of about 300±400 km and tropical storm±force winds over a diameter of about 650±800 km. Felix moved northwestward at about 25 km h21 with the eye passing about 65 km southwest of the mooring on 15 August. Peak winds reached about 135 km h21 at the mooring. Complementary satellite sea surface temperature maps show that a swath of cooler water (by about 3.58±4.08C) was left in the wake of Felix with the mooring in the center of the wake. Prior to the passage of Felix, the mooring site was undergoing strong heating and strati®cation. However, this trend was dramatically interrupted by the passage of the hurricane. As Felix passed the mooring, large inertial currents (speeds of 100 cm s21 at 25 m) were generated within the upper layer.
    [Show full text]
  • Skill of Synthetic Superensemble Hurricane Forecasts for the Canadian Maritime Provinces Heather Lynn Szymczak
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2004 Skill of Synthetic Superensemble Hurricane Forecasts for the Canadian Maritime Provinces Heather Lynn Szymczak Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES SKILL OF SYNTHETIC SUPERENSEMBLE HURRICANE FORECASTS FOR THE CANADIAN MARITIME PROVINCES By HEATHER LYNN SZYMCZAK A Thesis submitted to the Department of Meteorology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Degree Awarded: Fall Semester, 2004 The members of the Committee approve the Thesis of Heather Szymczak defended on 26 October 2004. _________________________________ T.N. Krishnamurti Professor Directing Thesis _________________________________ Philip Cunningham Committee Member _________________________________ Robert Hart Committee Member Approved: ____________________________________________ Robert Ellingson, Chair, Department of Meteorology ____________________________________________ Donald Foss, Dean, College of Arts and Science The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii I would like to dedicate my work to my parents, Tom and Linda Szymczak, for their unending love and support throughout my long academic career. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to extend my deepest gratitude to my major professor, Dr. T.N. Krishnamurti, for all his ideas, support, and guidance during my time here at Florida State. I would like to thank my committee members, Drs. Philip Cunningham and Robert Hart for all of their valuable help and suggestions. I would also like to extend my gratitude to Peter Bowyer at the Canadian Hurricane Centre for his help with the Canadian Hurricane Climatology.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of an Objective Scheme to Estimate Tropical Cyclone Intensity from Digital Geostationary Satellite Infrared Imagery
    172 WEATHER AND FORECASTING VOLUME 13 Development of an Objective Scheme to Estimate Tropical Cyclone Intensity from Digital Geostationary Satellite Infrared Imagery CHRISTOPHER S. VELDEN AND TIMOTHY L. OLANDER Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies, Madison, Wisconsin RAYMOND M. ZEHR Regional and Mesoscale Meteorology Branch, NOAA/NESDIS, Fort Collins, Colorado (Manuscript received 17 July 1996, in ®nal form 10 August 1997) ABSTRACT The standard method for estimating the intensity of tropical cyclones is based on satellite observations (Dvorak technique) and is utilized operationally by tropical analysis centers around the world. The technique relies on image pattern recognition along with analyst interpretation of empirically based rules regarding the vigor and organization of convection surrounding the storm center. While this method performs well enough in most cases to be employed operationally, there are situations when analyst judgment can lead to discrepancies between different analysis centers estimating the same storm. In an attempt to eliminate this subjectivity, a computer-based algorithm that operates objectively on digital infrared information has been developed. An original version of this algorithm (engineered primarily by the third author) has been signi®cantly modi®ed and advanced to include selected ``Dvorak rules,'' additional constraints, and a time-averaging scheme. This modi®ed version, the Objective Dvorak Technique (ODT), is applicable to tropical cyclones that have attained tropical storm or hurricane strength. The performance of the ODT is evaluated on cases from the 1995 and 1996 Atlantic hurricane seasons. Reconnaissance aircraft measurements of minimum surface pressure are used to validate the satellite-based estimates. Statistical analysis indicates the technique to be competitive with, and in some cases superior to, the Dvorak-based intensity estimates produced operationally by satellite analysts from tropical analysis centers.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Risk Management for the Health Sector in Nicaragua
    CLIMATE RISK MANAGEMENT FOR THE HEALTH SECTOR IN NICARAGUA Prepared by the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) January 2013 United Nations Development Programme CRISIS PREVENTION AND RECOVERY Copyright © UNDP 2013 All rights reserved This report was commissioned by the United Nations Development Programme’s Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery (BCPR), under the Climate Risk Management Technical Assistance Support Project (CRM TASP). The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) implemented the CRM TASP in seven countries (Dominican Republic, Honduras, Kenya, Nicaragua, Niger, Peru and Uganda). This CRM TASP country report was authored by: Marius Keller Cite as: United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery (BCPR). 2013. Climate Risk Management for the Health Sector in Nicaragua. New York, NY: UNDP BCPR. Published by United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery (BCPR), One UN Plaza, New York–10017 UNDP partners with people at all levels of society to help build nations that can withstand crisis, and drive and sustain the kind of growth that improves the quality of life for everyone. On the ground in 177 countries and territories, we offer global perspective and local insight to help empower lives and build resilient nations. www.undp.org 2 CONTENTS FOREWORD .......................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Real-Case Simulations of Hurricane–Ocean Interaction Using a High
    VOLUME 128 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW APRIL 2000 Real-Case Simulations of Hurricane±Ocean Interaction Using A High-Resolution Coupled Model: Effects on Hurricane Intensity MORRIS A. BENDER NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey ISAAC GINIS Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, Narragansett, Rhode Island (Manuscript received 13 July 1998, in ®nal form 2 April 1999) ABSTRACT In order to investigate the effect of tropical cyclone±ocean interaction on the intensity of observed hurricanes, the GFDL movable triply nested mesh hurricane model was coupled with a high-resolution version of the 1 Princeton Ocean Model. The ocean model had /68 uniform resolution, which matched the horizontal resolution of the hurricane model in its innermost grid. Experiments were run with and without inclusion of the coupling for two cases of Hurricane Opal (1995) and one case of Hurricane Gilbert (1988) in the Gulf of Mexico and two cases each of Hurricanes Felix (1995) and Fran (1996) in the western Atlantic. The results con®rmed the conclusions suggested by the earlier idealized studies that the cooling of the sea surface induced by the tropical cyclone will have a signi®cant impact on the intensity of observed storms, particularly for slow moving storms where the SST decrease is greater. In each of the seven forecasts, the ocean coupling led to substantial im- provements in the prediction of storm intensity measured by the storm's minimum sea level pressure. Without the effect of coupling the GFDL model incorrectly forecasted 25-hPa deepening of Gilbert as it moved across the Gulf of Mexico.
    [Show full text]