<<

A POPULATION OF BOG IN THE PIEDMONT OF NORTH CAROLINA:

Habitat Preferences, Capture Method Efficacy, Conservation Initiatives, and Site Enhancement

by

Ann Berry Somers Department of Biology University of North Carolina at Greensboro Greensboro, North Carolina

Submitted to Natural Resources Conservation Service Wetlands Institute

Abridged Version May 2000 A POPULATION OF BOG TURTLES IN THE PIEDMONT OF NORTH CAROLINA:

Habitat Preferences, Capture Method Efficacy, Conservation Initiatives, and Site Enhancement

by

Ann Berry Somers Department of Biology University of North Carolina at Greensboro Greensboro, North Carolina

Submitted to Natural Resources Conservation Service Wetlands Institute

Abridged Version May 2000 In rdr t prtt th rrh bjt, ntv nfrtn h bn ttd. Table of Contents

Table of Contents ...... ii List of Tables ...... iv List of Figures ...... List of Appendices ...... vi Preface ...... vii Acknowledgements ...... ix 1. Introduction ...... 1 1.1 Background and Purpose ...... 1 1.2 The Site ...... 6 1.2.1 Site Description ...... 6 1.2.2 Photographic History of Site ...... 7 1.2.3 Reasons for Choice ...... 8

2. Conservation Initiatives and Site Enhancement ...... 10 2.1 Landowner Interactions ...... 10 2.1.1 Education ...... 10 2.1.2 Landowner Involvement ...... 10 2.1.3 Lease Agreement ...... 10 2.2 Seasonal Exclusion of Cattle ...... 12 2.3 Headstarting ...... 12 2.4 DNA Collection and Analysis ...... 14 2.5 Workshops and Meetings ...... 14

3. Population Assessment ...... 17 3.1 Introduction ...... 17 3.2 Methods ...... 18 3.2.1 Field Methods ...... 18 3.2.2 Radio-tracking ...... 20 3.2.3 Headstarting ...... 21 3.3 Results ...... 21 3.4 Conclusions and Discussion ...... 24 3.4.1 Population Size Increase ...... 24 3.4.2 Demographic Concerns ...... 26 3.4.3 Inbreeding Concerns ...... 27 3.4.4 Size Concerns ...... 28 3.5 Are Small, Isolated Populations Worth Saving? ...... 29 3.6 On Considering Augmentation ...... 31 3.6.1 Rationale ...... 31 3.6.2 Halfway Technology? ...... 35 3.6.3 Experimental Short-distance Translocation ...... 36 btt rfrn ...... 37 1 Intrdtn ...... 37 Mthd ...... 37 4.2. ld Mthd ...... 37 4.2.2 n Ettn ...... 3 3 lt ...... 3 4.. th rfrn ...... 3 4..2 btt rfrn ...... 4.. n Sz ...... 4..4 U f Iprvd Ar ...... 4.. btt Chn lt f Cttl Exln ...... 5 Cnln nd n ......

5 Cptr Mthd Eff ...... 51 Intrdtn ...... 5 Mthd ...... 5 .2. Cptr hn ...... 5 53 rppn v l Srh ...... 51 .. Stttl Mthd ...... 5 ..2 lt ...... 5 5 f Yr ...... 5 .4. Stttl Mthd ...... 5 .4.2 lt ...... 55 pltn Sz nd rppn S ...... 55 .. Stttl Mthd ...... . .2 lt ...... 57 5 lbl ttn f Sll pltn ...... 57 .6. Stttl Mthd ...... 59 .6.2 lt ...... 59 57 Cnln nd n ...... 59

ndtn ...... 1 rh St "A" ...... trnn th Orrn f rtl In tntl St ......

7 rthr Std lnnd ...... 3

trtr Ctd ...... Appndx I — Arl Mp f rh St "A" ...... 7 Appndx II — ndnr t ...... 7 Appndx III — Spl Arnt ...... Appndx I — rtl tn t rh St "A" 1993 — 199 ...... 9 Appndx — rh St "A" lnt Sp t ...... 11 t f bl

1 t f Cttl Exln 199 - 199 ...... 1

rfl f rtl t rh St "A" n 199 ......

3 pltn Sz nd A Strtr f rtl Cptrd t rh St A n 1993 nd 199 ...... 5

th rfrn f rtl t rh St "A" ...... 3

5 th rfrn f d-ltrd rtl ...... 39

btt rfrn f rtl n rh St "A" 1993 — 199 ......

7 btt rfrn f rtl Cprd Wth All Othr rtl ......

xd Krnl nt n Ett f rtl t rh St "A" ...... t f r

1 Cpt n f th rtl n th Etrn Untd Stt ......

(h r Ottd — Cntt thr fr frthr nfrtn ...... 5

3 Md f rh St "A" ...... 9

ndnr nd rtl ...... 11

5 ndnr lpn ld Cttl Exln n ...... 11

Gnrl tr f ttn n Opn th nd vt Exln n ...... 13

7 Mnnt Wrhp M 11 1995 ...... 1

CS Offl r rh St "A" M 1995 ...... 1

9 (h r Ottd — Cntt thr fr frthr nfrtn ...... 19

1 btt rfrn f rtl t rh St "A" ...... 1

11 rnt f btt U f rtl Cprd th All Othr rtl ...... 3

1 l Srh r Invtd nd br f rtl Cptrd ...... 53

13 rp r Invtd v rtl rppd t rh St "A" 1993-199 ..... 5

1 rp Effrt r rtl Cptr In Cprn St "C" (= + nd rh St "A" ( 1 ...... 5 t f Appnd

I Anl htrph f rh St "A" St 19 1951 1955 19 1977 ... 7

II ndnr t ...... 7

I Spl Arnt......

I tn f rtl t rh St "A" 1993-199 ...... 9

lnt Sp t fr rh St "A" ...... 11 rf

In 1993 b trtl Clemmys muhlenbergii (Shpff r fnd

n t d n th pdnt f rth Crln Althh th t

pprd drdd nd rzn prr hv thr d t b

nh rnn hbtt t pprt hlth ppltn f b trtl

Intrt r n th t nd n b trtl hbtt rtrtn ffrt bn dd nd t ntt th prjt r prvdd b th

rtnr fr Wldlf prr f th US h nd Wldlf Srv

( USWS A rv f r prfrd n th tht rvld vr lttl dt vlbl n rtrn nhnn r nn h t t

pt f dln fr nnt f th rr tlnd th

dll f th lndnr nth f ll nrvtnt nd th ddtd br f rjt rtl — th p f th rnl prjt

xpndd h prjt n f n ndtn b rrh tht ll

lttl ld t th dvlpnt f nnt dln fr h

t A nbr f tt fdrl nd prvt n r trtn t prt rtrtn th rnt nd fr h nfrtn vr pprnt

Std tht hv bn nrtd fr th prjt ddr h ntrt rtrtn hdrl d vttn nnt th rl f rzn hrbvr n hbtt nnt nd thr nrn

Anthr trth f th prjt h bn prtv rnt

d t prrvn th vlbl tlnd A Mrnd f

Undrtndn h bn dvlpd t frlz th prtnrhp btn the following: NC Chapter Soil and Water Conservation Society, Natural

Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Wetland Science Institute and

Watershed Science Institute, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Sierra Club,

The Nature Conservancy, NC Natural Heritage Program, Piedmont Land

Conservancy, Foothills Nature Science Society, Project Bog , and others. "pt prbl [nrvn p] thr ppr t b tr h hv bn ln rd ffr And fr th t prt th hv bn th r f xtrrdnrl ddtd ndvdl nt ln f brrt I pt tht th trtl r ll b fht nd n nd lt b ndvdl `trtl n nd trtl n h r n dvn n fr th hlnn d t v thr p" - hn hlr (1997 I ld l t nld th tn f th flln extraordinarily dedicated individuals: The members of Project : nn rn; hrp; ff n; d; Chr MGrth; r Mrd; Sr; vd Sr; Grn nd thr

Data analysis: nnfr Mnfld-n h prtnt f l Unvrt f rth Crln t Grnbr

Editorial assistant: Elzbth Wltn UCG

Plant species list: Knnth A rdl h

Student assistants: Elzbth Wltn UCG Inrd rnzn hl Shl f th Envrnnt Unvrt Kf Gv UCG hn UCG

Technical assistance and field assistance were provided by: Evrhrt; rnt Shlr; Shlr; Mrnd lb; rnnn lb; Anl p; nnfr Mnfld-n; Elzbth Wltn; hn Sl I; M; r ll; Mtth lr; r b; Gr Gn; n v; n Sth; ff Wll; Chrl l; rr ln; Chr MGrth; n trn; r nnr M; r r Crrll M; Kn rdl; n hl; Wrnr; rn rn; Aln ntn; Abrh h nd Gr Sr

Funding and other support for the project were provided by: trl r Cnrvtn Srv; US h nd Wldlf Srv; thll tr Sn St; rth Crln Wldlf drtn; h r Cpn ndtn; Sl nd Wtr St f rth Crln; rjt rtl; rth Crln rptll St; dvll trnr ptl; thll tr Sn St; Sr Sht Mtl; Srr Clb f rth Crln; n rr; Ann nd Gr Sr; lt r nd vlpnt In

rth Crln Wldlf r Cn prvdd prt 1. Introduction

1.1 Background and Purpose

Many scientists now recognize the importance of landscape-level management in protecting ecosystems and communities of organisms (National Research Council 1992).

Among the rarest and most endangered of ecosystems in the southeast are spring-fed wetlands of the mountains and piedmont. Such areas provide habitat for approximately 90 species of plants and that are considered rare, threatened or endangered (Murdock

1994). Many of these sites have been drained or otherwise altered by human activity. Due to the loss of wetlands over the , only about 500 acres of mountain bog habitat remain

(A. Weakly in Herman and Tryon 1997).

A rare element known to occur in some of these sites is the bog turtle, Clemmys muhlenbergii (Schoepff). Bog turtles are small, secretive turtles that inhabit spring-fed wetlands within a limited range in the eastern U.S. The turtles occur in disjunct patches of habitat in 12 states from New England to northeastern Georgia (Figure 1). A four hundred km (250-mile) gap separates the turtles into distinct northern and southern geographic regions (Herman 1994). The northern population occurs from New York and

Massachusetts south to Maryland. The southern population ranges from southwest Virginia to northern Georgia. Bog turtles are threatened with extinction throughout their range and are protected in all 12 states of their occurrence.

In for the US Fish and Wildlife Service to list a species as Threatened or

Endangered, sufficient data must be available to justify the listing. Presently, the Service nl h ffnt tt nd thrt dt t pprt th ltn f th nrthrn ppltn

h nrthrn ppltn fdrll ltd hrtnd n 1997 nd n rv prttn ndr th Endnrd Sp At (USWS 1997 h thrn ppltn ltd "thrtnd d t lrt f pprn" rtl fr thrn ppltn

ll rbl trtl fr nrthrn ppltn tht nfrnt prnnl nnt b

xptd t dtnh btn th h "lrt f pprn" ltn dnd t

nz nfrnt prbl nd hlp nrv th nrthrn ppltn (USWS 1997

Stt rv r n ndr n th th ttptn t th nbr nd rn

f xtnt ln

trtl r p vlnrbl t xtntn h r lt trn hv l rt f ppltn nr nd rr plzd hbtt In ddtn thr ppltn

z r ll ll nd thr blt t dpr fftvl h bn rtl rdd d t hbtt l nd rdtn nd frnttn f hbtt

An ntrtn pt f th p tht t ftn ltd n rltrl ttn

n nn tlnd f ttl nd hr ptr Sh r hv t b nldd

n nt tp nn t d r d b (Kvt 197; rn nd

rn 1997 Mn blt r nlnd t thn f ndnrd nd thrtnd p bn nptbl th rltr h nt nrl tr fr th b trtl

Althh drnn fr rltrl prp nd vrtn ptr hv drdd n

t b trtl n tll b fnd n t ptr rtl dnt r ftn hhr n

rzd ptr thn n lr nn-rzd r ntrl r th np r b-np

(rn nd rn 1997 vr thr rr lnt h Gr ll (l grayi), b r (Arethusa bulbosa), nd p pn (Helonias bullata) fnd n nn-

rzd r lhtl rzd tlnd hv lrd bn lt fr n t n fr

rdtn f t bjtd t rzn n rlt fr hf trff nd x ntrnt npt fr fl tr h ft tht n ln f trtl r fnd n fr

ttn t th ntn tht thr r l bnft td th rzn Sntt

ndrn th ttr t tht rzn ttl nd hr rtrd th rth f d vttn nd prvnt np lr (rn nd rn 1997; hlnn t l 1997;

rn 1999

Sn n vbl b trtl ln r fnd n ptr ttn prttn b trtl fr xtntn n dvlpn t n t n fr th ppltn n b tblzd r nrd h ln-rn l f th prjt t nr th nbr f b trtl n drdd d b n fr th n tv ttl

prtn h thn bn ttd r pl nd th trl hp nd rdl

vlbl h ntnt t thr bln dt n ppltn f b trtl n t hr

nhnnt ffrt r ndr n rdr t prvd dn n th rtrtn nd

nnt f lr t nl rfrrd t b nd d b Cnrrnt

td t th t nld hdrll nt nd d vttn nnt

td h prjt hdrlt pln t nplt th fl f tr n n tn f th

tlnd n hp f ffttn th d d b n xtn drn dth h hld

nr th z f th hbtt prfrrd b th trtl W r prntl ntrn th

tr lvl t tblh bln dt fr pr- nd pt-trtnt nl n rdr t dtrn f th ffrt r fl

.2 h St

1.2.1 Site Description

h td ndrtn n prvtl nd fl fr n n Uppr dnt

nt n rth Crln t th b f th l d rpnt pprxtl 57

(15 ft bv lvl (St 3 r h prr rltrl f th fr bf prdtn h lnd h bn n th nrhp f th fl fr vr 1 r nd prntl thr r fv br f thr nrtn lvn thr Ernn nrtd fr th fr pplnt th fl n Althh n prprt f fr ftr dvlpnt thr n dn t th t f lln th fr r n prtn f th prprt fr n rn

hr r thr vr ll nd dtnt tlnd pth n th fr ntnd thn

dtr f 5 (r 3 h thr pth brdr bbl nd rvl dntd

tr (p nd C n n lftn n 199 thr th r bt 1 htr n z (15 h

1 h bn trd "th pn pth" It h dp ft d nd rv

nfnt nlht d t th l-lvl vttn nd pn np ndtn It 5 htr (35 r n z nd h r f t ldr (Alnus serrulata) rrndd b

n tlnd hrb vttn f Carex pp Scirpus pp Juncus p t

(Appndx v b ttl prr t rtn f th xln fn rltd n dndd pth thrh ldr n th lr nd f th pth h pn pth ndrd th r r b t t ll rbl prfrrd hbtt (nn prn-fd tlnd

th ft d nd l-lvl d nd r nd t f th trtl ptr hv bn pth (3 prtlrl drt hr t b rvr b th lt 197

h ldr lndnr n n hr lt xt rll trn t drn th hfld pth th hr hbnd dd rlr Sh rnt th trnd ffrt h nd hr hbnd pt frth t d t th dth th hr-drn pn r th phtrph

plt tht th ttptd t drn th r t n th lt 195 t d 19

1.2.3 Reasons for Choice

h t h vrl hrtrt tht t ttrtv fr ppltn td nd

t nhnnt prjt

➢ Landowner stability: h fr h bn hld n th fl fr r thn 1 r h prnt lndnr n h d-thrt th hldrn tht nnl ntrtd n th fr th trtl nd th prjt;

➢ Landowner interest: All fv fl br lvn n th fr (thr nrtn r pprtv f th prjt nd r ntrtd n hlpn;

➢ Small size: St nhnnt ffrt hld hv dttbl rlt;

➢ Three distinct wetland patches n l prxt tht ntn nl tbl hbtt fr b trtl;

Wetlands are seemingly suitable in size, vegetation and hydrology t pprt n nrn nbr f b trtl

2. Cnrvtn Inttv nd St Enhnnt

2. ndnr Intrtn

2.. Edtn

n f th lndnr hd vr n r hrd f b trtl ntl n trppd

n thr fr n 1993 (r prt f th Cnt trl Ar Invntr (ndll t

1995 Sbntl I prvdd th th rttn trl n th fr f ndnr

t (Appndx II hh r pld b rjt rtl ( nd Inrd

rnzn r ntrn l br r l nvtd t ll tl tht r bn

vn prt f th nvntr hh th ttndd n vrl n

2..2 ndnr Invlvnt n t Clltn nd btt Enhnnt

h lndnr nt nl rntd t th t th b tvl nvlvd

n th prjt All br f th thr nrtn lvn n th fr prtptd n dffrnt nldn hlpn th fn ntrtn ntrn tr dpth n ll

hn trp nd hlpn th vl rv (r 5

2.. Arnt

nd prvdd b th h nd Wldlf Srv d t pbl fr rjt

rtl ( t l d b fr lndnr btn 1997 nd 1999 h l

rnt r prt f n xprntl prr dnd t hhtn th ntrt f lndnr n prttn ndnrd p n thr prprt h l r dld

ftr trdtnl rrl lnd-l rnt hr n frr l lnd fr nthr frr fr h prdtn (Appndx In h fl rdl rd t prtpt n th

xprntl prr th

2.2 Snl Exln f Cttl

hr r ptv nd ntv pt f lr hrbvr rzn n d b. h ntv pt nld: ( dndn vttn n r f th b tht b pth (2 ntrnt npt fr fl trl nd ( th ptntl t trpl

ntv p nldn b trtl nd . h ptv pt th rtrdtn f

d vttn rth tht th np rn pn. In rdr t rd th ntv

pt f ttl n th tlnd bt tll ll th ttl rtrtd , nl

xln fn rtd rnd th pn pth n l f 4 nd ltr xtndd n

vbr 6 (r 6. h d t xld ttl drn th n tht

b n th t (rn n nd pn th t drn th ntr fr rzn nd brn. bl prvd dt f ttl xln.

2.3 Headstarting

In , rvd fl (0.2 vd t Atlnt, ndr th r f nn

rn, t prtpt n hdtrtn nttv tht ndr n rth Crln t th t. dtrtn tr d n n dffrnt ppltn n trtl nrvtn.

In th t d t drb th nbtn f hl n th prttv td f

n xprnd rrhr nd th dt rl f hthln b nt th ld.

dtrtn nt prntl ndrd vbl nrvtn ptn fr th prjt.

2.4 A Clltn nd Anl

ld lltd fr x trtl n (bl 2. A xtrtd nd

nt t r. rd, nrvtn ntt, t rtbr Stt Unvrt n

Mrlnd. r. rd rn th r. fr USGS n n ttpt t dvlp

n t "fnrprnt" trtl. Addtnl A pl r lltd fr t thr

t n th nt (r 2, St 2 nd 4. A hld ll rrhr t t rltnhp btn ppltn f trtl n dffrnt t ll trtl thn t.

h nfrtn ll b xtrl vlbl fr ftr rrh n fftv ppltn

z nd nbrdn ffnt, nd fr tblhn nnt dln.

2. Wrhp nd Mtn

h rh St "A" h rvd fld t fr vrl rhp nd

tn. h nld:

➢ Mnnt Wrhp. M , . Attndd b 4 ndvdl fr h n : US h nd Wldlf Srv, rth Crln Wldlf r Cn, trl r Cnrvtn Srv, rjt rtl, h rth Crln tr Cnrvn, Unvrt f rth Crln t Grnbr, Unvrt f rth Crln t Ahvll, Unvrt f rn t lbr, hr tr M nd Ar, h rth Crln ll r, l d r tff fr rn nd rth Crln, nd Shl M f trl tr (r .

➢ trl r Cnrvtn Srv ffl t th lndnr nd vtd th t. M 20, . Evrhrt, Cnt trt Sprvr nd Anl p, CS Ennr dd th prjt th l hnn (thn Chf, nd tt ffl (r 8. nnl pprt fr th CS flld, hh h lld th prjt t ntn.

> Srr Clb Mtn, thll Chptr. n 6. d prtn f hbtt nd nrvtn nttv ndr. rtnrn n n nd nn vrnntl n (GO nrd. h Srr Clb prvdd th prjt th an intern from Duke University, Ingrid Franzen, in the summer of 1996. Her assistance allowed data collection to continue in 1996.

> The Duke Power Company Foundation, Environmental Division representatives John Garton and Dale Mostellar and North Carolina Wildlife Federation (then) Executive Director, Tom Bean met with project scientists. June 1997. Discussed importance of habitat and conservation initiatives underway. Partnering among agencies and NGOs was encouraged. Financial support from both agencies followed which assisted in supporting the work reported in this document.

> Future activities: Workshop for Teachers sponsored by USFWS. June 5, 1999. Teachers will work on fencing, check traps, probe for turtles, and learn about the hydrology and vegetation issues of concern to the project.

. pltn Ant

3.1 Introduction

Most of the significant research delineating the range and habitat of bog turtles has been conducted in the last several decades (Lee and Norden 1996). At the same time, a drastic decline in numbers of sites and sizes of populations within many of the remaining sites have been reported (Herman 1994; Lee and Norden 1996; Herman and Tryon 1997).

There are still major gaps in our knowledge about the demographics and population dynamics of the species (Herman 1994; Lee and Norden 1996). Only recently has there been enough information available to allow the northern population to be included on the federal endangered species list; adequate surveys still have not been completed for the southern population (USFWS 1997).

In order to assess the threat of extinction of any species, the viability of the individual populations and metapopulations must be determined. A turtle sighting or a site inhabited by a few individuals does not necessarily mean that a viable population is present. Since bog turtles are long-lived, individuals may occupy sites long after the site is incapable of supporting a healthy population (Lee and Norden 1996; Herman and Tryon

1997).

Only a few remaining sites are considered good, and population sizes and other demographic data remain largely unknown. Only 17% of the remaining sites in the northern population are considered good; 75% are considered fair or poor; and 8% are of unknown status (USFWS 1997). Herman (1994) assessed the viability of populations in the south and concluded that only 23% (11) can be considered viable. In rpn t th lrn ttt thr rn ntrt n rvvn t tht hv flln nt dln vr t dt thr r n td tht rprt n rtrtn ffrt f d b n th th n th td ndrtn n n

ttpt t nrt dt tht n b d t hlp dn rtrtn ffrt lhr In

rdr t th r flr f n rtrtn prjt pr-trtnt dt t b

vlbl t fltt bfr-nd-ftr prn h l f th td r t dtrn (1 bln ppltn nbr prr t t nhnnt ffrt; nd ( f

nl xln f ttl ld nr ppltn z n t tht hvl

ptd b lvt

3 Mthd

3.2.1 Field Methods

rtl r hnd-lltd b vl rh hl prbn th t (l brt fr 1993-199 rtl r l trppd th hnd-d r h trp l tht f h (1993 tht r nt btd (r 9 Cptrd b trtl r prnntl rd th ll nth n rnl t th trnlr fl l tht

f Cl (1939 nd rn (191 h trtl r nbrd n th rdr n hh th

r fnd All thr trtl p nntrd r ntd

t lltd n b trtl nldd xt ltn nd nrl hbtt tp f

ptrd trtl; ptr thd (trp nl hnd; rphtr rnt drbd bl; dt f ptr; x nd rprdtv tt f nn

All b trtl r rd fr trht-ln rp lnth (SC dth hll hht nd pltrn lnth n 15- dl lpr; rd n r th 3-r l prn l rtl r xd b xtrnl nptn dlt l hv nv pltrn lnr tl nd r ptrrl pld l thn fl A ttd b ntn nnl n (1991 ld drn fr th drl rvl n f x trtl fr ftr A nl (S rtl r

lt l rld dtl t th t f ptr Erl n th tv n f

1995 f trtl r tn nt ptvt fr hrt t fr trnttr tthnt

rhr nd tnt ltr b r prfnt nd r frtbl hnn trnttr n th fld

.2.2 dtrn

v trtl r flld b rdtltr drn 1995 nd 199 nd brfl n

1997 rnttr ( Eltrn 15 Mhz r nd n tn f rl x

nd dntl rl nd nhrd t th rp th 5-nt px nd t px

n Elr t (199 Wht ddtn rnd fr - r nd dd nt xd th rndd 7 f bd ht dln (Shbr 191 Elr t l 199 In n

ttpt t xtnd bttr lf vr th ntr xprntd th trnttr tfttd

th bttr (rthr thn 1 n th fll f 1995 bt dntnd t b th

ddtnl ht xdd prtl ( 9 f bd ht

In 1995 trtl nd 5 r ntrd n vr f vr d btn -n nd -Sptbr (vr 3 t nd n vr f vr 115 d

(vr 53 t n th fll (1-Sp thrh 3- nd nll thrht th

ntr nth In 199 trtl 1 5 nd r ntrd n vr f vr

d btn 1-n nd -l (vr t nd n vr f vr 35 d (vr 55 t fr th nd f l t d-br rtl 1 trd nll thrht th ntr f 199-1997

Eh t trtl ltd n th pn pth ( 1 t ptn brn

(nrt ° nd dtn rd t th nrt fnpt All fnpt r

rvd nd plttd n th AtCA p nrtd b CS nnr (r 3

tn f trtl n th ld pth ( r rd t lndr h lr tr tht r plttd b rn dtn nd brn fr fxd rv pnt Onl

n trtl brvd n th hfld pth ( 3 nd nl th pprxt ltn

rrdd fr tht brvtn (Appndx I

.2. dtrtn

In n f 1993 trtl tn nt ptvt nd ld t Atlnt

ndr th r f nn rn (S rtl th nl rvvn hthln

nd rld nt th t n -A-93 thln hv flxbl rp nd r dfflt t prnntl nth hn t ll b dfflt t b r f th trtl dntt f

ptr t n h f th trtl b th nl l

. lt

A ttl f brvtn r d f 1 lv b trtl btn 1993-199;

n hthln trtl fnd dd n ttl drppn n fld rrndn th r r

n 11-M-95 hthln r rln r vr ptrd n trp rln

vr ptrd n th t b n n vl rhn r trppn vnl pprd n th trp b r 3 ( 7 9 1 11 trtl ndr th f 5 vr dvrd b n n thr thn trppn xpt hthln n dlt r b-

dlt hv bn ptrd n l 199 vn thh vr 1 trp hr hv bn

xpndd n tht t (bl

Turtle 0.2a (headstarted) has not been seen since its release as a hatchling in 1993.

The number of recaptures of turtles indicate that all sub-adult and adult turtles that inhabit the open patch or seasonally use the open patch have been captured. Indeed it is quite possible that all individuals over the age of 3 in the open patch have been trapped. It is unlikely that turtle 0.2a (5 years old in 1998) would have gone undetected with such intense trapping effort at the site and is not presently counted in the population estimate.

However, it is possible this turtle is still alive and has either moved to a different area, evaded the traps or was misidentified as another turtle (see below).

In 1998, a young assistant mistakenly identified one turtle captured as 0.8. She noted that it was difficult to find a marginal notch on the . However, the turtle did not match the description of 0.8 and was most likely 1.0 or (unlikely) a previously uncaptured turtle from a 1993 clutch (0.2a). Turtle 1.0 was weakly marked in 1996 as a 2- -old by Ingrid Franzen, a summer intern (Franzen, pers. com.) and has not been seen since. It is also possible that the misidentified turtle represents a new turtle.

Turtle 0.2 died in May of 1996 while carrying a radio-transmitter. A necropsy revealed 3 yoked eggs and no discernable illness or infection; the cause of death remains a mystery.

The most responsible estimate for the 1998 bog turtle population is believed to be about 10 (all turtles except 0.2 and 0.2a are presumed to be alive). The ptrr estimate of the population number prior to the seasonal exclusion of cattle in 1994 was 7 individuals (Table 3). Hence, these data suggest an increase of 43% in the population since intervention began. The Research Site "A" population is growing: 60% of the 1998 ppltn r b-dlt r jvnl At th t dnt n b ttd t 1 trtl pr htr

3 Cnln nd n

3.4.1 Population Size Increase

h nr n ppltn n rnt r thh ll n blt tr nt

nnfnt nd tll rprnt lr nr (3 fr h ll ppltn

(bl 3 Svrl ftr ppr t hv ntrbtd On th rtn f th ttl

xln fn Cttl t tlnd r f fd hn ptr r dpltd nd nj th ln fft f d n ht thr rr t rtn f th fn t f 1 hd n f hv pt b hf trff (S 1; r

hr r ndtn tht xldn lvt nll h bn bnfl fr th trtl

t th t It ppr fr th f trtl 9 1 nd 11 tht thr fl

lth n 199 h dd hthln dvrd n M f 1995 l hv bn fr tht lth An ddtnl nt fl n 1995 hh rltd n t lt n lv

ffprn (trtl h nr b ttrbtd t prttn f th nt r( prvdd b th lvt xln fn rtd n 1 n l 199

Anthr ftr prbbl ntrbtd t rnt rrtnt hr t lt n

fl nt h r fr 199-1995 rn th t prd thr r t fl f rprdtv n th ppltn nd It tptn t pt tht trtl f rprdtv rnd 199 nd th thr f n r r f th lth A vdn n prvd nht nt th hpth (S

rtl rvd th thr hn h dd n 199

A nrn th nr r nrn rn t th ln-tr vblt f th ppltn b f t ll z Cnrvtn blt hv ln

nn tht ll ppltn r hhl prn t xtntn (Shffr 191 197; Glpn

197; nd nd rrlh 197; Mff nd Crrll 199; r 199 hr r

n nrn nldn l f nt vrblt nbrdn nd nt drft

Envrnntl nd drph flttn l p r thrt

.4.2 rph Cnrn.

hr r ndtn tht hlth rn xt n th b trtl ppltn t

rh St "A" bt tht th ppltn z ll (bl Ovr trp hr hv bn ld n th lt r nd nl 11 ndvdl b trtl hv bn

dntfd h dth f dlt fl trtl n M f 199 lv nl n nn

dlt fl n th ppltn (trtl

rph nrtnt n prtnt nrn fr ll ppltn (Sl

197 h l f trtl n b ndrd drph ttrph fr th ll ppltn b h n f nl t fl f rprdtv h trtl ld hv bn ndrd th nl t prtnt ndvdl n th ppltn n tr f rprdtv vl b f hr ndr nd n Addtnll hr rn f

tvt hd nfnt vrlp th l 1 nd 5 prttn rtnt tht h ld hv n trbl nntrn t Indd trtl 5 nd r ftn ntd n th

dt vnt f n nthr drn n dffrnt t f th r n 1995 hl bth r bn tltrd In ll ppltn ptntl t hv dfflt n fndn n nthr

(All fft frthr rdn rrtnt rtl th nl rnn dlt fl

pnd t f hr t n th ld pth hl bth dlt l pnd t f thr t n th pn pth (r 11; Appndx I lthh bth dlt l

nl vt t th ld pth I ltd fl n r nr th pn pth h

n h ntrd 199 1995 nd 199 On nthr n 15-M-97 I trd l 1 nd fnd h n th fvrt pt f fl (Chptr S 3

f th vnt I tl ptt tht th fl ll fnd t t lt n r

t fr nthr t n rth Crln ndt tht rth Crln b trtl

nl rprd vr nd r thrd n n th ld vn thh th r blll

pbl f rprdn vr n (rn 199 f th nd th rn

ntnd bv I blv t rnbl t xpt rrtnt t l ftr th dth f

dlt fl n 199 h ttn t tht thr r prbl fr th ln-rn rvvl f th ppltn blhd nfrtn n ht prnt f fl n hlth ppltn n b xptd t b rvd h r nt

vlbl bt rtnl thr vrtn n rprdtv tpt f ndvdl nd rn fr nrn n n ppltn hr thr nl n dlt fl

.4. Inbrdn Cnrn

Mtn n rh St "A" ppltn ll rrn btn ll rltd trtl (bln thr-n t Inbrdn nrn nld rdd ftn f

ndvdl d t fxd lll (rdd nt vrtn nd bldp f dltr n Cn prbl nld rdtn n trt td th ftn h bd z fndt nd lnvt (nd nd rrlh 197 pltd nt vrtn

l rlt n rdd blt t dpt t hn n th nvrnnt

ld pl r tn fr x trtl t th t nd fr nl trtl t

h f th t lt t n th drn A xtrtd fr th bld

pl nd hppd t rtbr Stt Unvrt hr ffrt r ndr t dvlp

n tht ll ll trtl t b ntll "fnrprntd" pfll ll n b bl t dtrn prnt nd nbrdn ffnt nd th b bl t th

nt hlth f th ppltn Exntn f th A f n rrt ld v

nfrtn bt th ftn f th ndvdl dlt n th ppltn h nln f th A dt nt th rn ptr f th ppltn ll v ddtnl nht

nt th dn t r n th t nthl t lrd t pprnt fr

xtn dt tht th ppltn n r dnr f xtrptn b f t ll

z A nd nd rrlh (197 pnt t drph ftr (h z nd

rth rt t prdn vr nt nrn n nt vrtn nt

prtnt f th ppltn b xtnt

3.4.4 Size Concerns

Sz jt n f th n ftr tht t b hd hn n th ptntl fr ppltn t prt vn n th hrt tr (5-1 r Othr

ndrtn nld t lt prttn nd nntdn; nt ftr;

fftv ppltn z; lt trnd nd flttn; nd n thr vr n

rtn ppltn z b th f t dt nrn (nd nd Barrowclough 1987). I believe the Research Site "A" population is just such a case.

3.5 Are Small, Isolated Populations Worth Saving?

Many populations of birds have survived for 80 years with 10 or fewer breeding pairs (Primack 1998) and northern elephant seals have recovered to a population of 30,000 after being reduced by hunting to only about 20 individuals (Bonnell and Selander 1974).

Despite these encouraging cases, it is clear that small populations are in real danger of going extinct even in the short term (Shaffer 1981; Gilpin and Soulé 1986; Pimm et al.

1988). Since most populations of bog turtles are small, it is clear that we cannot save all of them. We must focus our conservation efforts on saving and enhancing populations that may be important to the viability of the species as a whole. We should also keep in mind that all species provide services in their ecosystems and these contributions must not be undervalued. Hence, some small populations may be worthy of conservation efforts if enhancement efforts are underway or imminent, by merit of their eco-services or potential for such services, even if they are not seen as important for the survival of the species as a whole.

How can we determine where to best utilize our efforts? Although it is quite clear that we cannot save every remnant population, it may be irresponsible to give up entirely on all small populations. Most of the remaining populations of bog turtles r ll. Most populations in Virginia consist of fewer than 20 individuals (Buhlmann et al. 1997) and are found in sites 1-2 hectares in size. North Carolina sites are usually less than three hectares and have populations < 35 turtles per hectare (Herman and Tryon 1997). We must carefully consider our conservation alternatives under these conditions. Ardn t Kln (1997 ll tr b nr W t nt tr nd v vr p f hbtt nd vr dn ppltn h rn lt nd p

th pth f nthn An ntl pnnt f nrvtn pln fr n p

nld f th tt f ppltn nd ndvdl t t l h dt fr t

thrn b trtl ppltn

In rdr t ddr th prbl f nffnt dt Kln (1993 dvlpd prtl lld "Stndrdzd rtl St-lt Anl" t th pt f

t t ntn vbl ppltn f b trtl St r rnd rdn t fr ftr (1 hbtt z nd dr f frnttn; ( th prn f nvv plnt

nd ltr nl p; (3 dt thrt h tlnd dthn flln r

xvtn; nd ( th tp nd xtnt f lnd n th r h frt tr ddr th f ntrnntdn th thr tlnd nd ppltn ( ptntl fr

tppltn pltn z nd vdn f rrtnt r l tn nt nt

hn h dt r vlbl nd r l thn 1 r ld v tr r ltd

ndr ppltn z t nn t ntn 5 r r ndvdl r rnd n th hht tr; t th fr thn 5 ndvdl r rnd th lt hr r thr pbl t fr th "Stndrdzd rtl St-lt Anl" nn-vbl pbl vbl nd vbl Althh Kln prdntl t ddtnl ntttv

rv b ndd t rtl dtrn vblt th tl prvd n xllnt pl t trt ll tr rt nrvtnt ll nntrt ffrt n th

"vbl" nd "pbl vbl" t nd ll th "nn-vbl" t t htvr ft

On t nt t-lt nt t dtrn th lvl f ntrt n rvvn t ndnr r ll nrvtnt b dfntl ntrtd r nt

ntrtd t ll n h prjt St tht rn "nn-vbl" ll hv n ddtnl

tr nt th f thr n lndnr ntrt r n ntrt n th prt f ll

nrvtnt t prv th t

.6 On Cndrn Anttn

"... t nlt th bjt [f n vbl ppltn z] ntrl t thr nrn f th nn f ll ppltn z r hfl thnn"

dd nd Sl 1991

.6. tnl

Indvdl fnd n ppltn tht r dd t xtntn r rfrrd t

"th lvn dd" (r 199 Sh tr pprprt n hr th

ndvdl ll nt hv th pprtnt t ntrbt nt trl t ftr

nrtn b f th nblt f thr ppltn t prt n th hrt tr (3-5

r St tht r lrl nn-vbl b bt tlzd r f ndvdl fr

rfll plnnd nttn prr Aftr thrh hlth nt ndvdl

ld b vd t vbl r pbl vbl ppltn n th r nrb drn

hr t prvnt prjt r ndr nd bln ppltn dt t tht

h tn rrntd nnt ndvdl ht prvd nt trl r

t fr trtl n ll ppltn n nrb t nnt l b vd t rvrn t nl ln nh t t nnt fl ld b lld t l

n th rvrn t r ll ppltn t prt xhn f ndvdl btn ppltn t r t vd nbrdn dprn (r 1995; Glpn 197 Sll hll tlnd n rpdl ndr nfnt vttn hn (Kvt

197 A b trtl ld prbbl v fr n dlnn ln t r f

prvn lt d t rdtn f th ffndn d plnt rlt f fr r bvr tvt ( nd rdn 199 Indd t ppltn f b trtl r blvd t xt tppltn n hh xhn f ndvdl vr prtnt

pt (hlnn t l 1997 A ppltn ndrd ntll ltd f thr l thn n fftv rnt pr nrtn (d nd rrlh 197 h fl

f ndvdl btn ppltn blvd t hv fvrbl nt nd drph

nn (Glpn 197 nd h bn ptl trd th r fft b rn nd

Kdr-rn (1977 In th f b trtl th vnt ld ntrll t pl n th r nrb drn

Sr nrn hv bn rd bt th dvblt f vn ndvdl t dffrnt ltn fr vr vld rn (Cnnt 19; nrt 1991; dd nd Sl 1991;

Strfr 199; Kr 1997; nrt nd prt 1999 h nld d trnn

nd l f ttntn t nt drph nd hbtt nrn On f th prr

bjtn th rtl l f nfrtn n ln-tr r flr f hrptfnl-rltd prjt (dd nd Sl 1991 Chrtrt f vld

xprntl trnltn hld nld (1 lltn f bln ppltn dt ( dntrtd nd fr ddtnl nt r drph nttn (3 nld f th f dln ( lntn f prbl hh d th dln (5 hlth

h n nl t b rld ( prvn fr fll-p td t prd ntrvl

nd (7 llnn t pblh th thdl nd rlt f th prr rrdl f success or failure (Dodd and Seigel 1991). Experimentation and long-term monitoring are

necessary before augmentation programs should be employed as an acceptable

conservation strategy. Indeed, such research is critically needed in order to make sound

judgements regarding conservation options, since translocation and augmentation are not proven management techniques.

Research Site "A" site ranks as "possibly viable" using the "Standardized Bog

Turtle Site-quality Analysis" and may be an ideal site for this type of research. Many of

the above criteria have already been met at Research Site "A" site: baseline population data

are reported in this document; the demographic need is clear; the habitat is clearly suitable;

genetic studies are underway; site enhancement efforts are underway; and evidence exists

that conditions have improved (see Results, Chapters 3 and 4). There is every expectation

that this project will continue with or without funding. Studies are underway to identify a

source for an animal suitable for augmentation (Chapter 7).

Relocating can threaten the survival of that individuaL Some relocated

animals do not reestablish home ranges (Belzer 1996) and mortality rates can increase

(Reinert and Rupert 1999). Unmonitored animals may move away from suitable habitat as if attempting to locate familiar territory and wander into harms way (like roads) or

otherwise be lost to the project. A critical aspect of translocating individuals then, is to monitor them. Moving turtles into a monitored project can protect translocated individuals

and aid in conservation efforts (Belzer 1996). Animals that do not adjust well could be rescued and moved back to the original site. Even if only one clutch is laid (in the case of females) or one successful mating occurs (in the case of males) the recovering population ld bnft h offspring f trnltd ndvdl hld hv n trbl djtn (lzr 199 t th n t

nt n r d fflt h t b d ftn n th bn f

dt dt Whn th t f ltrnt tn r nrtn t hrd t

ntpt nttvl hh n ll b bt (Mr t l 197 Gd dt lltn

nd ntf xprnttn ll rtl t r dn n pr

I rnd tht bn t rh fr r f fl b trtl n n

ttpt t nt th ppltn t rh St "A" On pblt th rh

St "" (r n th rvr drn h hhl drdd t nd rn

"nn-vbl" n Kln (1993 "Stndrdzd rtl St-lt Anl"

rbl thr nld lttl rnn hbtt; dvnd d n; r prr

ttpt t drn th t n tl; nd n ntrt n rtrn th t b thr th lndnr r ll nrvtnt Ardn t Sl (197 " thr r n hpl

nl ppl tht hp nd xpnv " trtn f th nn-vbl

rh St "" nt b hpl t jt b n n hh thr n ntrt

Std ll b ndtd n 1999 tht ll dd t xtn ppltn dt n

rh St "" Addtnll trppn ffrt ll b nrd n th hfld pth f

rh St "A" t pbl dtrn f thr r ddtnl trtl rdn thr

(Chptr 7 A bld pl fr th trnltd trtl hld ll t dntf hr

ffprn hld h rprd n th n t Strt dl ntrn b rd tltr

ll b prt f th rndtn n f th nrn tht b trtl nt ttl

ll nt nn-ntl t h vl f h n xprnt tht b bl t lrn r bt rltd t trnltn f b trtl hl rpndn t drph r t n prvn t.

.6.2 lf hnl?

lf thnl tr tht frt d n nrvtn ntxt b t

rzr (199 h tr drb nrvtn r tht ddr th pt f prbl rthr thn th rzr d t t drb th nfftvn f hdtrtn

trtl hn prtt th fr hzrd f rl lf-t bt pt th b nt th nhlth n hr thr prnt ld nt rvv rnltn nd

nttn l fll nt th tr f hlf thnl hn th r

r d t v trtl nt t hr th rnl ( f dln h nt bn

ddrd

h nt th t rh St "A" rlnr dt ndt tht

nrvtn ffrt t th t hv prvd ndtn fr th b trtl Effrt bn b nll xldn ttl hn lvt xln fn ntrtd n 199

(S Addtnl fnn n 199 nld rtr prtn f th r r nd hv fnd trtl tlzn th prvd r (Chptr ; Appndx I An tt f th ppltn f trtl n th t prr t nrvtn ffrt 7 ndvdl Sn thn 5 trtl hv bn ddd t th ppltn (3 nr h rprnt

nfnt nr nd h vn rn t b ptt bt ndtn t th t

trtn th prr nnt trt rndd fr hbtt tht r

nn t ntn b trtl (Kvt 197; rn 199; nd rdn 199 bt hv flln nt dln d t rvl f lvt vrtn ptr n r drn b dthn Whn t r prvd ppltn r nt b bl t

nr t tnbl lvl Exprnttn n ppltn nttn flln hbtt prvnt rl ndd

3.6.3 Experimental Short-distance Translocation

On 1-n-1997 I trnltd trtl hrt dtn n rdr t brv h bhvr rtl 1 vd fr th pn pth ( 1 hr h pnt 9 f h t t th hfld pth ( 3 hr h hd nvr bn brvd h prp f th xprnt t f th trtl ld n ttpt t rtrn t th pn pth

trd t dl fr bt t nd nvr vd r thn

tr fr th rl pnt thn rtrnd t th pn pth 4. btt rfrn: An Ant In Atn Wth btt Enhnnt Effrt

4. Intrdtn

In rdr t nhn t t fl t n hh r thn th t th trtl prfr tht prtnt rhbtt tp r nrd h l f th td t dtrn (1 f ll thr tlnd t rh St "A" r tlzd b b trtl; ( f

vnt r btn th thr dffrnt tlnd pth; (3 f n f th thr pth prfrrd vr th thr; nd ( rhbtt prfrn

4.2 Mthd

4.2.1 Field Methods

rtl r fnd n vl rh thn nd trp (S 3 S trtl r tfttd th rd-trnttr nd thr xt ltn nd nrl hbtt rrdd

btt trzd 1 - t d (d/r dnnt; - d

hbtt; 3 - ldr n pn pth (Alnus serrulata); 4 tr np; r 5 - n tr r

tr bn f ld pth Wt d dfnd l th l lvl hrb vttn pd f tlnd-td plnt (h Carex pp Scirpus

pp Juncus pp t Wt d hbtt tr 1 fnd n th pn pth nl Ed hbtt tr thn tr f t-d/ldr r t-d/tr

np d nd fnd n bth th pn nd ld pth Ctr 3 ldr hbtt

fnd n th ntr f th pn pth h ldr bndr nldd n ll fr f th pn pth (r 3 ; Appndx I Ctr nd 5 r hbtt f th ld pth r np hrtrzd t f th ld pth ( xpt fr th W r-d d nd nldd p h pn (Toxicodendron vernix), rd

pl (Acer rubrum), bx ldr (Acer negundo), rn h (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) nd

Arn h (Fraxinus americana). Ch-r nl f ntnn tbl d t xn th rltnhp btn dttn thd (tltr r hnd/trp nd

pprnt prfrn fr r r vttn tp

4.2.2 Home Range Estimation

r nl (1 5 pl z f r thn fx r vlbl

rp nd tltr ltn r pld fr xntn f h rn z rn z r dtrnd fr th nl n fxd rnl dnt ttr

(Krnlhr vr Sn nd ll n rd z f nd bnddth r

thn prtr f h fxd bnddth d b th trtl tndd t

th ltn rptdl prldn f th thr prfrbl (Sn nd

ll 199 lt r r vldtn thd

4. lt

4.3.1 Patch Preferences

rtl r fnd n ll thr tlnd pth bt prfrrd th pn pth In ft 3 f ll trtl ltd r n th tlnd r (bl rppn ltd n th ld pth d t ttl rltn n dtnt b n th lltn f trp ffrt (trp ffrt n th pn pth ntttd 75 f ttl trp ffrt h rfltd n th pprnt pth prfrn td b th trppn

dt (bl Ch-r nl td dffrn btn pth prfrn

ndtd b tltr dt nd pth prfrn td b ll nn-tltr

brvtn bnd (rn Ch-r = = f th fft tltr dt r nlzd n nbd ndtr f hbtt pttrn bl 5 rprnt th pth prfrn f rd-tltrd trtl

n trtl fnd n ll thr pth On trtl (3 brvd n bth th pn pth ( 1 nd th hfld pth ( 3 rtl 3 trppd ttl f

t thr ntv t n th pn pth nd n r th r n th hfld pth h trtl h nt bn n n th ptr n th hfld pth bt blvd t tll b thr (Appndx I

hr trtl (1 nd 5; ll th dlt xpt trtl r brvd n bth th pn pth nd th ld pth ( 1 nd rtl 1 pnt t f h t n th pn pth th nl fr t th ld pth; 3 t f 3 brvtn r n th ld pth (1 rtl 5 brvd n n th ld pth t f brvtn rtl pnt t f hr t n th ld pth th fr t th pn pth; t f 3 brvtn (7 r n th ld pth rtl 7

9 1 nd 11 r nvr brvd td f th pn pth (Appndx I rtl

nlr n hr prfrn fr th ld pth

4..2 btt rfrn

rtl h prfrn fr l-lvl d nd r r d hbtt 79

f th t ppd t ldr ld np hbtt r tr bn hh ntd fr

nl 1 f th rrd (bl r 1 (t n 5 f hbtt nt rrdd

Unl th thr t brvtn f trtl r n th ld pth (

nd t f th brvtn thn tht r r n th r bn r n th r tht

rnt fr th prn f tht tlnd Onl n nthr trtl brvd n th

r bn trtl 1 ( l trd t th fvrt pt f trtl ( fl n th

r bn ndr th rt f n pl tr n 15-M-97 rbl th

tn fr; hvr trtl nt ppd th trnttr t tht t hr prn nt nfrd (Appndx I

Anl f hbtt prfrn f rd-trd trtl n prn t prfrn f trtl ltd b ll thr n td n nfnt dffrn d t b (rn Ch-r = = 5 vr nn-tltr thd fld t

dtt trtl f th lt-tlzd ld-np r

h dt l rflt lrl tht trtl n n hr h f fvrd

hbtt Sh hd rrbl ffnt fr th tr nd tr-bn hbtt n th

ld pth ntn fr ll th rrd f rrn n tht hbtt v n (bl

7 r 11

rdn nl bd ll n rd-trn dt lltrt th pt f th

nl nl n nrlztn rrdn trtl prfrn r h f th 5 trtl trd h hbtt tp nd rn r bd n th trtl prfrn fr tht hbtt th 1 ndtn th hht nbr f brvtn n tht hbtt nd 5 th lt rdn t- nl f th prfrn rnn f th dffrnt hbtt fr

h trtl dd pprt th hpth f rnt n th trtl bt nl rnll

(rdn ttt = 97 = 5 h Kndll nrdn ffnt fr th prfrn rnn f th fv nl nl 9 h nl ttn trtl ldd = 19 nd nrdn ffnt f 73

4.3.3 Home Range Size

h 95 h rn tt r 1 - 15 htr fr th nl xnd

(bl h vr f th h rn fr th fl th fr th l

(13 h n th fxd rnl dnt thd

4.3.4 Use of Improved Areas

rr t th rtn f th rnl xln fn (l 199 n r n th lr

nd f th ldr f th pn pth dndd f vttn b ttl r n t

pth (S1 nd r A rlt f th prttn ffrd b th fn th

r r p n d nd r Althh n pr-fnn hbtt prfrn dt r

vlbl fr prn pt-fnn llt dt ndt tht trtl fvrd th r Of th 19 t trtl 1 ltd n th pn pth f th r n th rvrn ttl pth (1 rtl 5 fnd n th r f th rvrn ttl pth 7 (15 f 55 rrd f th t nd hbrntd thr n th ntr f 1995-9 rtl

ltd n th rvrn ttl pth 3 f th t (3 f 13 rrd rtl

nd 9 l tlzd th r f th ld ttl pth (Appndx I

An ddtnl fn rtd n vbr 199 hh nrd th r tht

prttd b th rnl fn (r h hrb vttn n th r prttd b th ddtnl fn r h tllr nd trtl bn n th r r thn th hd bfr rr t th ddtnl fnn nl trtl d th r Aftr

vbr 199 trtl 1 5 nd d th r (Appndx I

4.. btt Chn lt f Cttl Exln

Snll xldn ttl prvd bnfl b lln r-tblhnt f vttn n th dndd r Sd nd r dntd r f th pn pth r

lld t r tllr h tllr hrb vttn tll lld nlht t pntrt

t prvdd vr fr th rtv trtl nd th bn t tlz th r r (

bv

h fft f xldn ttl r nt ll ptv rhr bn t nt ntv fft n th l nd hdrl f th pn r Wtr tht n vd thrh th t n ht-fl bn t fr hnnl h hnnl b dpr nn nt th btrt Wtr bn t v thrh th t ftr nd r tht r t n prr

r bn t dr t nd hrdn vn hn thr fvrbl (l vprtn

ld tprtr hh rnfll It ppr tht ttl tr bnft t b drptn hnnl frtn nd pn th d ft nd t h lrt b trtl ppltn (nd pbl th t vbl r td th ttl rzn (rn 199 nd xldn ttl ltthr nt rndd

f ll nd ntv tr ntrn pnt th ttl r xldd fr th t fr lt 3 r (bl 1 Snl rzn f th t h n rd drn th lt fll ntr nd rl prn nth

4.4 Cnln nd n

h td rnfr thr (Crtr 1997 tht ndt f hbtt tp

prtnt rtl t rh St "A" ll prfrrd d nd d/r dnnt hbtt

h fndn r th thr tht b trtl prfr l-lvl vttn r

n prn-fd tlnd hr r nd d dnt (Ch t 199; rn

199; Crtr 1997 rtl prvd n ntrtn xptn t th prfrrn tr

nd tr bn ltn n ld np ndtn Crtr (1997 fnd tht f 9 trtl n 3 t n thtrn rn nvr tlzd tr hbtt Of th thr trtl

n h td tht tlzd tr hbtt nl n fnd n tr r thn 1 f th t h hrpl ntrt th trtl h ltd n tr r tr bn hbtt vr 33 f th t n rh St "A" (r 11

Addtnll th trtl n rh St "A" r fnd t prfr d hbtt

(r 1 Crtr (1997 dd nt brv th bhvr nd fnd tht b trtl nthr

ltd nr vdd d hbtt n h td

rn z n Mrlnd rprtd b Ch t (199 r 17 h fr

l nd fr fl n hrn n nl Ernt (1977 rprtd 133 h h rn fr l nd 1 h fr fl n nnlvn bd n Mn Cnvx Polygon (MCP) analysis. Carter (1997) found that average home range sizes in southwestern Virginia were 0.47 ha for females and 0.57 ha for males using MCP analysis.

Using the same data points and calculating home range using cluster analysis he found average home ranges to be 0.17 ha for females and 0.13 ha for males. Kernel density analysis of data in Research Site "A" in North Carolina revealed home ranges (0.13 ha average for males and females) similar to those of Carter (1997) using cluster analysis.

However, comparison of the home ranges reported at this site with those reported at other sites should be conducted cautiously, as home range size estimates are sensitive to the choice of bandwidth at small sample sizes. . Cptr Mthd Eff

5.1 Introduction

Effrt r ndr t rv ptntl hbtt thrht th rn f th b trtl t dtrn hr th r n fr th tvt vr n t tht ntn b trtl r llr thn 1 r th d nt fll ndr th prttn f n

tlnd lltn nd r dtrd b dvlpr r rd ntrtn bfr th r

dntfd In th ntrt f prrvn th p nrvtn blt r n r t lt t bfr th r lt (rn 1995; hrp 199 Altrntl trnprttn

ffl nnrn fr nd dvlpr ftn nd htr r ptntl t vltd

n rdr t btn prt bfr flln r thr dtrn t

Whn ptntl b trtl t r ltd fr dvlpnt rrhr r lld

pn t dtrntn t th prn r bn f th nl n t St tht r rvd tht fndn vdn f b trtl n thn b dtrd

rntl thr r n dln fr dtl dtrnn th prn r

bn f th p trtl r nn t b rtv nd dfflt t fnd nd n

l nbrvd vn b xprnd rrhr (pplrt 1975; USWS 1997

h th pblt xt tht t tht d ntn trtl pll t th ll ppltn r bn vrld

A nbr f ndnt dnt th prbl On vr ll drdd t n

rth Crln rvd vrl t b f th t xprnd rrhr n th tt tht prdn trtl Sbntl dlt trtl (nldn n adults) were discovered when a backhoe operator dug them up in 1997 (David Sawyer, pers. com.; Thorp 1997). Another interesting example is a site discovered in a piedmont county in North Carolina in 1993. Three adult turtle shells as well as empty eggshells from a hatched were found there, confirming the site as bog turtle habitat. However, extensive visual surveys over a period of 5 years which included effort by at least 8 experienced researchers and a small amount of trapping effort have not yet produced one live turtle (NC State Museum files and pers. observation). If the adult shells or the eggshells were not present, this site would still not be confirmed. At the time of the discovery there were no records of bog turtles anywhere in that drainage or in that county.

If the site had been included in a development project at that time, investigators would have had little choice but to write a report stating that the site had been extensively surveyed with no bog turtles found, thus allowing the hypothetical project to proceed.

The most common method of assessing potential sites is by visual search techniques (Beane 1993; Smith 1994; Herman 1995). Searchers follow turtle tracks, pull back vegetation, and search the mud with broomsticks and by hand. Trapping was first used by researchers as a method of catching bog turtles in the south in the early 1990s by

Ken Fahey in Georgia and Dennis Herman in North Carolina (Fahey 1992, 1993; Herman

1992). Dennis Gemmell (1994) also reports trapping efforts in New Jersey. Trapping has since been used for surveys and as a census tool particularly in the Piedmont province of

North Carolina (Beane 1993; Thorp 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998; Green 1993,

1994; Herman 1995; Somers 1996, 1997, 1998). Trapping now serves as an important method of determining the presence of turtles in potential sites as well as assessing population status within sites. One piedmont site was surveyed many times using visual rh th n Whn trp r d th t ldd b trtl thn th frt hr (hrp 1993 Evn thh trppn h prvn t b n fftv tl fr

n th prn f trtl t nt ftn d t t ltd fr dvlpnt

Mt rnn ppltn f b trtl r ll (S 31 nd lrnn r

bt h ppltn pll prtnt t frlt pln fr rvvl f th

p h b trtl ppltn t rh St "A" nn t b ll ( 7 1

t fr th ppltn td t th t r d t xn (1 fftvn f vl rh n prn th trppn n dtrnn th prn f b trtl n

t th ll ppltn; ( ptl t f r t fnd trtl n t th ll ppltn nd (3 th nr lvl f ffrt t fnd trtl n t th ll ppltn lt fr trppn ffrt t rh St "A" r prd th

lr ffrt n Cprn St "C" ( = + t dtrn th rltv fftvn f trppn trtl n t th hlth ppltn f b trtl ppd t t th

ll ppltn

5 Mthd

.2. Cptr thn (l S 3

Clltn f trtl b n f vl rh n prbn t nd b nn-btd hnd d trp (r 9 tn rrhr tdnt lndnr nd vlntr td n dt lltn l rh t r rrdd ftr h vt

nd r lltd fr h r ndvdll r t th t nvlvd vr dt (rrdn trtl ltn ttndn t vtr nd r tln th tdnt r lndnr nl t pnt n tv rhn rrdd rp r pld n d vl rn r btn d lp n bt 1 f tr (lthh d t hdrl vrtn th lvl hnd nd hd vr - hr Cptrd b trtl r prnntl rd th ll nth n th rnl

t d th trnlr fl l tht f Cl (1939 nd rn (191 nd rld t th t

On trp hr lltd n trp n th t fr n hr rp r d

n th thr pth fr ttl f 159 trp hr vr th -r td Mt ffrt

xpndd n 199 (3 nd 1995 (9 Ornll n 1993 nd 199 trp r pld rndl n th thr tlnd r 1995-199 trp r pld n r hr trtl

r xptd nd r tht hd bn nn-prdtv n th pt r vdd

rppn d t ltd dr n th ld pth (1 f ttl trp ffrt b th r pn t rzn ttl thrht th r nd trp pld thr

r t fnd trpld (n trtl f n p vr hrd W trppd hvl n th hfld pth n 199 nd 1995 hr t f 7 r 53 f th ttl ffrt n th r Aftr 1995 nl nr trppn ffrt xpndd n th hfld b nl n b trtl vr ht n tht rn rppn rrd prrl n 1 (75 f ttl ffrt fr ll 5 r b th trp r r

fftv thr nd r prttd fr ttl d b th lvt xln fn

ntrtd n 199

5.3 Trapping vs. Visual Search

Trapping is anecdotally reported to be very successful under some circumstances.

However, it does involve appreciable time investment in trap placement, and the investigator must check the trap at fairly frequent intervals (24-48 hours) to assure the lfr f n trppd nl W ht t dtrn hthr trppn r vl/prb rh ntttd th t fftv dttn thd t t pd b ll b trtl ppltn

5.3.1 Statistical Methods

h hrl rtrn n hnd rh ffrt bd n th nbr f trtl

ptrd b hnd t rh St "A" nd th rrdd t xpndd n tv rh fr trtl prvl drbd nvtd b th nvttr tndn trp nt ld drn th td r prbl r f nvttr ffrt xpndd n trppn ttd th t rrnt f trppn 15 hr t t p trn f trp flld b 5-hr h h hr ntl th trp r rvd On hr

lld fr rvl A fr hnd rh th ld ptd th nbr f trtl ptrd n lndr nth pr hr f nvttr ffrt

f r nrprtd nt th nl f ptr thn h lndr

r dvdd nt t-nth tr n rdr t hv tttll fl pl

z thn h t tr - AOA prfrd n trtl ld dt t

xn th fft f t prd nd ptr thn

5.3.2 Results

tn trtl b hnd dfflt l rh hr pr trtl ptrd

vrd pr r r fll 3 (1993; 5 (199; 399 (1995; 13 (199; 375

(1997; n trtl r ptrd b hnd n 199 h vr trtl dttn rt pr hr f vl rh 3 trtl/hr

Efft f bth bnthl tr ( = nd ptr thn ( 1

r hhl nfnt nd trppn prvd t b th r fftv n f ptrn trtl In th M-n t prd th vr ld f trppn 59 trtl/hr f

nvttr ffrt hl th hnd ptr rt trtl/hr

5 f Yr

pl th th Cln Wtr At dvlpr r rrd t btn prt bfr th r lld t fll trl n tlnd A rlt rrhr r

t lld pn t t fr th prn f b trtl n tlnd I hv rvd h rt n nr nd thr nth tht r nl npprprt fr dtrnn th prn f rptl n n t St hll f dd trtl r pt

hll n b fnd nfrn tlnd b trtl t vr t tht ld n vdn f trtl drn prd f l tvt t l b rxnd t

pt t hr hv bn nbr f ppr tht ddr th nl tvt pttrn f b trtl (Ch t 199; vh t 199; Ernt t 199; Crtr

1997 bt n t th td r dn n prtvl lr ppltn n vl rh Crtr (1997 bd n vl nd r-rptr thn nldd tht b trtl rn tv n lt r W ht t dtrn hthr prnnd nl pttrn r prnt n th dttblt b trppn f th ll ppltn t rh St "A"

5.4.1 Statistical Methods

In rdr t hv tttll fl pl z thn h t prd

xnd th lndr r dvdd nt t-nth tr h 3 nth n

hh trppn ttptd rnd fr Aprl t Otbr fr h tr

(Mrh-Aprl M-n l-A Spt-Ot r xnd r h nth trppn ndx lltd th ttl nbr f trtl trppd tht nth dvdd b th ttl hr f trppn ffrt rppn ffrt dfnd th nbr f

trp d ltpld b th nbr f hr trp r n pl rtn n trppn

ndx xnd th Krl-Wll tt n th nthl tr

bv A ltpl prn prdr d t pr trppn vl n th fr bnthl tr t fl nfdn lvl f lph = 5

5.4.2 Results

A rtr prnt f trtl r ptrd pr trp hr n M nd n thn

n thr nth (r 13 nd th Krl-Wll tt ndtd tht th nl

vrtn nfnt ( =

rppn nfntl rtr n th bnthl t prd f M-

n (5 x1 trtl/trp hr thn n th Mrh-Aprl t prd (9 x 1 trtl/trp hr r th l-At prd (1 x 1- trtl/trp hr rppn dd nt

dffr nfntl btn th l-At nd Sptbr-Otbr (15 x 1 trtl/trp hr t prd

. pltn Sz nd rppn S

5.5.1 Methods

rppn rlt fr rh St "A" r prd th lr dt

nrtd fr hh lt t l ltd n th dnt prvn f rth Crln

h Cprn St "C" prntl h ppltn f rd trtl nd ndrd th lrt nd t vbl b trtl ppltn n th dnt f rth Crln nd th thrd lrt ndvdl ppltn n th tt (rn 1995 rtl r trppd n th

Cprn St "C" vr vrl nth ndn th trppn fr th prnt td

(Grn 1993 199; hrp 1995 t fr tht td r d t

pr th rltv dfflt f trppn trtl t t th ll ( 1 ppltn vr t th lrr ( = + ppltn t pbl ntr-r vrtn n trtl tvt nl prd f ltn td r prd rppn rrd n bth t ltnl drn fr nth (n 1993 M 199 n 199 M

1995 A Mnn-Whtn U tt d t pr trppn xprd trtl/trp hr r th t t

..2 lt

rppn ffrt pr trtl ptr t rh St "A" fr th prd f vrlp

vrd 7 hr pr trtl trppd ppd t n vr f 173 hr pr trtl trppd t th Cprn St "C" (r 1 Avr trppn fr th

nth ndrd r thn n rdr f ntd lr t rh St "A" (35 x 1 trtl/trp hr thn t Cprn St "C" (3 x trtl/trp hr

pt th ll pl z ( nth f td vrlp th ntr-t dffrn

tttll nfnt ( = 1 hr r thr nth ndrd n r 1; n

199 ttd b n trtl r ht t rh St "A" drn tht nth

.6 lbl ttn f Sll pltn

At rh St "A" trtl r nt ptrd drn vr nth f tv r

t th t Of th 3 nth n hh trppn (th t fl dttn thd

ndtd n trtl r ht drn In v f vr nt f b trtl ppltn bn vrld dpt nnt rhn nd th 35 flr rt t

rh St "A" dtrnd th lvl f ffrt rrd t rlbl dtt n f th

1 nl nn t b prnt

5.6.1 Statistical Methods

f th prvl tblhd nfnt dffrn btn M-n

rh ffrt nd ffrt xpndd thrht th rt f th r th dt r dvdd n th b W ndrd nl trppn dt d t th h rtr fftvn f trppn n f trtl ptr t th t W dld th ttl nbr f trtl trppd n nth fntn f th hr f trp prn t th t drn th nth

h t rrn r nvlvd n fr M-n dt nd nd fr ll thr

nth f th r Invr prdtn (ttr t t 195 d t tblh 95

nfdn ntrvl fr th trppn hr rrd t ptr nl trtl

ptrn n f th trtl prnt ld ff t tblh th prn f th ppltn th ppr bnd f th nfdn ntrvl n b ndrd lvl f ffrt

t hh dttn f th ppltn 95 prbbl

5.6.2 Results

In M-n ld nd t nvt 91 trp hr f ffrt t hv 95 llhd f dttn t lt 1 f th 1 trtl nn t b n th 1-htr t

vlnt t pprxtl 19 d f ntn trppn th trp In Aprl r n lt r/fll (l-Otbr th dttn prbblt ld dnd

pprxtl 1573 hr f trp ffrt r pprxtl 33 ntn d f trppn

th trp

57 Cnln nd n

Srv r bn ndtd thrht th rn f th b trtl t tf prt rrnt fr dvlpr nd trnprttn ffl bfr flln lld h rv r ll ndtd b n vl rh thn tht nvlv ln thrh th tlnd nd plln b vttn prbn th t nd rpn

trtl r dfflt t fnd vn fr xprnd rrhr rtl n ll ppltn prnt vn r dfflt h td t tht ll ppltn f trtl n ptntl t l ndttd n nl vl rh Srh ffrt

n n Mrlnd rv (Sth 199 vrd nt ( hr n t hr trtl r nt fnd ppd t 1 nt (17 hr n t hr trtl r fnd If nl nl trtl hd bn fnd t h pd t th rt ld b xprd trtl pr hr f rh btntll hhr ld thn

brvd fr vl rh t th rh St "A" ( trtl pr hr t fr

vh t l (199 rflt n vr f 7 trtl pr hr f rh (Mr- n

h hhr ld thn th rh St "A" h trn vdn tht t th ll ppltn n b l vrld Sh vrht n hv dtr rlt f t

r hdld fr dvlpnt lt f th td ndt tht trp hld b d t

t f vl rh fl t prd b trtl r n f b trtl

vlpr ll n rrhr t xn t fr trtl t n t f th

r In ntr nth t nl pbl t dtrn tht t ntn trtl f bn

hll (rp nd/r pltrn fnd (Ehll r t fnd bt r nt

nlv vdn f b trtl Erlr td rprt tht th ptl t fr fndn trtl b vl rhn n th prn (vh t l 199; Ernt t l 199; Crtr

1997 W fnd th l tr fr trppn

vr f n b trtl ff t tblh t b trtl hbtt bt dtrnn th lvl f ffrt nr t nld th prbbl bn f th p more challenging. A minimum of 9,000 trap hours per hectare of trapping effort in May

and June is needed to reliably detect a population of the size reported in this study (N

10). Since this effort level is roughly equivalent to setting 20 traps for 20 days in May and

June, this can be called the "20-20 Rule."

Matrix 2 of Klemens "Standardized Bog Turtle Site-quality Analysis" assigns the

lowest rank (1) to populations of up to 5 turtles (Klemens 1993). Populations with 6-10 individuals are assigned a rank of 2 on the scale of 1-5, and, depending on many factors

(mentioned above), are of a size that may warrant consideration for conservation or site

enhancement. It is probable that detecting populations with 6 individuals will require

much more than a 20-20 effort, but finding these populations is still worthwhile. Traps

should be concentrated in the region of best habitat (see Chapter 4). 6. Recommendations

6.1 For Research Site "A"

The Research Site "A" is a small, degraded wetland in the piedmont of North

Carolina with a population of bog turtles so reduced that it will not likely survive long into the future unless action is taken to increase their numbers. The factors limiting population size appear to be the restricted area of favored vegetation type within the site and overgrazing by cattle. Site enhancement efforts controlling (but not eliminating) access by cattle appears to be beneficial. Additional enhancement efforts are planned which will increase the size of the wetland in order to offset the effects of drainage.

The site seems ideal for a population augmentation experiment (Sec 3.6). Such experiments are desperately needed to expand our knowledge and our arsenal of tools to fight extinction.

6.2 r trnn th Orrn f rtl n tntl St

Our results suggest, when slated for development, small patches of marginal habitat should be considered bog turtle absentia only after a minimum of 9,000 trap-hours per hectare of trapping effort are invested in May and June. Since this is roughly equivalent to setting 20 traps for 20 days, it can be called the "20-20 Rule." Traps should be concentrated in regions of best habitat. Trapping in sites with fewer than 10 turtles per hectare or at other times of the year will require much more effort. 7. rthr Std lnnd

rppn ll ntn n 1999 It nll tht thr r ddtnl nptrd lr jvnl r dlt trtl rdn n th pn pth Unptrd trtl f ll

l rd n th hfld pth nd prhp vn n th ld pth Sn th

ld pth nt fnd r nbl t trp thr t prnt vr "bltz" trppn ffrt hdld fr th hfld pth n th prn f 1999 W pln t

trt tht r th 5+ trp fr t lt n rdr t tr nd rptr trtl 3

nd lrn f thr trtl tht nhbt th r

rb t n th drn ll l b trppd W pln t trp rh

St "A" nd rh St "" f prn rntd b th lndnr

Addtnl fnn plnnd fr th ld pth trtr Ctd

n IC 1993 A rv f th b trtl (Clemmys muhlenbergii) hbtt n th pdnt f rth Crln Bull. Herp. Soc. (11 -

hlr 1997 rbld t fr trtl In: J.V. Abb (d Proceedings: Conservation, Restoration, and Management of and Turtles — An International Conference. SUY rh Y

lzr 199 S bx trtl nrvtn Research and Conservation Newsletter brr 199

nnll M nd K Slndr 197 Elphnt l Gnt vrtn nd nr xtntn Science 1 9-99

rn nd A Kdr-rn 1977 rnvr rt n nlr brph fft f rtn n xtntn Ecology 5 5-9

hlnn KA MG lln SM bl nd C Mthll 1997 pprh fr th nrvtn f b trtl Clemmys muhlenbergii, n rn In: Abb (d Proceedings: Conservation, Restoration, and Management of Tortoises and Turtles — An International Conference. SUY rh Y

Cl 1939 A t f rn trtl fr ftr dntftn Copeia 1939 17-173

Crtr S 1997 Mvnt h rn nd hbtt prfrn nt f th b trtl (Clemmys muhlenbergii) n thtrn rn Unpbl MS th I nd Stt Unvrt lbr A 97 pp

Ch K xn E Gt b nd G lr 199 btt hrtrt ppltn z nd h rn f th b trtl Clemmys muhlenbergii, n Mrlnd Herpetol. 3( 11-1

Cnnt S 19 Svn ndnrd p b trnltn Ar tnrn th vltn? BioScience 3 ( 5-57

dd CK nd A Sl 1991 ltn rptrtn nd trnltn f phbn nd rptl Ar th nrvtn trt tht r? Herpetologica 7 33-35

Elr I A rh nd hlr 199 d tltr thn ppld t th b trtl (Clemmys muhlenbergii Shpff 11 In: C Shv S Mthll nd pld (d Et nnt r p nd nfnt hbtt& New York State Museum Bull. 71 9-7 Ernst, C.H. 1977. Biological notes on the bog turtle, Clemmys muhlenbergii. Herpetologica 33: 241-246.

Ernst, C.H., J.E. Lovich, and R.W. Barbour. 1994. Turtles of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Institution Press. Washington, D.C. 577 pp.

Fahey, K. 1992. Habitat survey and census of bog turtle (Clemmys muhlenbergii) Schoepff Populations in Georgia — Final Report for 1991-92. Unpublished report to Georgia Department of Natural Resources.

Fahey, K. 1993. Habitat survey and census of bog turtle (Clemmys muhlenbergii) Schoepff Populations in Georgia — Final Report for 1992-93. Unpublished report to Georgia Department of Natural Resources.

Frazer, N.B. 1992. turtle conservation and halfway technology. Conservation Biology. 6(2): 179-184.

Gemmell, D. J. 1994. Natural history and ecology of the bog turtle, Clemmys muhlenbergii. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick , N.J.

Gilpin, M.E. 1987. Spatial structure and population vulnerability. In: M.E. Soulé (ed.) Viable Populations for Conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Gilpin, M.E., and M.E. Soulé. 1986. Minimum viable populations: Processes of species extinction. In: M.E. Soulé (ed.), Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity, pp. 19-34. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.

Green, J.F. 1993. Report on the status, conservation, and management of the bog turtle, Clemmys muhlenbergii, in . . . North Carolina. Unpublished report to North Carolina Resources Commission. 17 pp.

Green, J.F. 1994. Report on the status, conservation, and management of the bog turtle, Clemmys muhlenbergii, in . . . North Carolina. Unpublished report to North Carolina Resources Commission. 14 pp.

Herman, D.W. 1981. Status of the bog turtle in the Southern Appalachians. In: R.R. Odum and J.W. Guthrie (eds.) Proceedings of the Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Symposium. Tech. Bull. W15, Georgia Dept. Nat. Resources, Game and Fish Div., Athens. Pp.77-80.

Herman, D.W. 1992. Status and distribution of the bog turtle, Clemmys muhlenbergii, in North Carolina, 1992. Unpublished report to North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission. 64 pp.

Herman, D.W. 1994. The bog turtle, Clemmys muhlenbergii, in North Carolina. An Action Plan for its Conservation and Management. Unpubl. report submitted to the North Carolina Resources Commission. 156 pp. rn W 199 h b trtl Clemmys muhlenbergii, n rth Crln An Atn ln fr t Cnrvtn nd Mnnt Unpbl rprt bttd t th rth Crln r Cn 15 pp

rn W 1995 h b trtl Clemmys muhlenbergii, n rth Crln Unpbl prr rprt bttd t th rth Crln Wldlf r Cn pp

rn W 1999 h pt f lvt rzn n b trtl ln n th pdnt nd ntn f th tht Unpbl rprt bttd t th trl r Cnrvtn Srv Wtlnd Inttt Mrh 1999

rn W nd W rn 1997 nd dvlpnt nd ntrl n nd thr fft n b trtl hbtt n th Stht Untd Stt In: Abb (d Proceedings: Conservation, Restoration, and Management of Tortoises and Turtles — An International Conference. SUY rh Y p 3-371

Kr 1997 Whn hbtt nt h Science, l 7 13-n-97 p 13- 13

Kvt E 197 trtl hbtt l Bull. Chicago Herpetol. Soc. 13( 9-

Kln MW 1993 Stndrdzd b trtl t-lt nl Unpbl rprt t th US h nd Wldlf Srv Arn M f trl tr Yr 7 pp

Kln MW 1997 Cnrvn Clemmys. In: nn (d Status and Conservation of Turtles of the Northeastern Unites States: A Symposium. Srpnt l nbr Mnnt

nd nd G rrlh 197 Efftv ppltn z nt vrtn nd thr n ppltn nnt In: M E Sl (d Viable Populations for Conservation, pp 7-1 Cbrd Unvrt r Cbrd

S nd AW rdn 199 trbtn l nd nrvtn nd f Mrlnd b trtl Clemmys muhlenbergii. Maryland Naturalist (1- 7-

vh E W rn nd K M h 199 Snl tvt nd vnt f b trtl (Clemmys muhlenbergii) n rth Crln Copeia 199( 117-1111

Mr A US Sl nd rrd 197 Mnn rtll ndnrd p th Sntrn rhn td In: M E Sl (d Viable Populations for Conservation. Cbrd Unvrt r Cbrd

Mtr GK nd C Crrll 199 Principles of conservation biology. Snr At In Sndrlnd M Netter, J., W. Wasserman, and M.H. Kutner. 1985. Applied linear statistical models: regression, analysis of variance, and experimental designs. Richard Irwin Inc., Homewood Illinois. 1127 pp.

Pimm, S.L., H. L. Jones and J. Diamond. 1988. On the risk of extinction. Am. Nat. 132: 757- 785.

Primack, R.B. 1995. Essentials of conservation biology. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA. 564 pp.

Primack, R.B. 1998. Essentials of conservation biology. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA. 2 nd Edition. 660 pp.

Randall, J., A. Somers, and M. Lipscomb. 1995. Natural areas inventory for . . . North Carolina. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation.

Reinert, H.K. 1991. Translocation as a conservation strategy for amphibians and reptiles: some comments, concerns, and observations. Herpetologica 47(3): 335-363.

Reinert, H.K., and R.R. Rupert, Jr. 1999. Impacts of translocation on behavior and survival of timber rattlesnakes, Crotalus horridus. J. Herpetol. 33(1): 45-61.

Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology Press.

Schoepff, I.D. 1792-1801. Historia testudinvm iconibvs. illvstrata. Ioannis Iacobe Palm., Erlange. 136 p.

Schubauer, J.P. 1981. A reliable radio-telemetry tracking system suitable for studies of chelonians. J.Herpetol. 15: 117-120.

Seaman, D.E. and R.A. Powell. 1996. An evaluation of kernel density estimators for home range analysis. Ecology 77 (7): 2075-2086.

Shaffer, M.L. 1981. Minimum population sizes for species conservation. BioScience 31: 131- 134.

Shaffer, M.L. 1987. Minimum viable populations: Coping with uncertainty. In: M.E. Soulé (ed.), Viable Populations for Conservation, pp. 69-86. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Smith, S.A. 1994. Report on the status of the bog turtle Clemmys muhlenbergii in Maryland. Unpubl. report submitted to the US Fish and Wildlife Service. 9 pp.

Somers, A.B. 1996. Endangered Species Permit Report. Unpubl. report submitted to the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission. Sth SA 199 prt n th tt f th b trtl Clemmys muhlenbergii n Mrlnd Unpbl rprt bttd t th US h nd Wldlf Srv 9 pp

Sr A 199 Endnrd Sp rt prt Unpbl rprt bttd t th rth Crln Wldlf r Cn

Sr A 1997 Endnrd Sp rt prt Unpbl rprt bttd t th rth Crln Wldlf r Cn

Sr A 199 Endnrd Sp rt prt Unpbl rprt bttd t th rth Crln Wldlf r Cn

Sl ME 197 Whr d fr hr? In: ME Sl (d Viable Populations for Conservation. Cbrd Unvrt r Cbrd

Strfr A 199 pltn l nd rptll Cnrvtn A Ctnr t Aphbn nd ptl Cnrvtn 1 (1 -3

hrp 1993 Stt prt n th 1993 Srv f th b trtl Clemmys muhlenbergii, n th trn pdnt Unpbl rprt bttd t C Wldlf r Cn

hrp 199 Stt prt n th 199 Srv f th b trtl Clemmys muhlenbergii, n th trn pdnt Unpbl rprt bttd t C Wldlf r Cn

hrp 1995 h b trtl Clemmys muhlenbergii, n th trn pdnt Unpbl rprt bttd t C Wldlf r Cn

hrp 199 Stt prt n th 199 Srv f th b trtl Clemmys muhlenbergii. Unpbl rprt bttd t th rth Crln Wldlf r Cn

hrp 1997 rjt b trtl Stt prt n th 1997 rv f th b trtl Clemmys muhlenbergii. Unpbl rprt bttd t C Wldlf r Cn

hrp 199 Stt prt n th 199 Srv f th b trtl Clemmys muhlenbergii. Unpbl rprt bttd t th rth Crln Wldlf r Cn

US h nd Wldlf Srv 1997 l rl t lt th nrthrn ppltn f th b trtl thrtnd nd th thrn ppltn thrtnd d t lrt f pprn Federal Register (13 595-593 pplrt 1975 h tt f th b trtl Clemmys muhlenbergii, n rth Crln tnl Adbn S prt pp

G 1991 Age Determination in Turtles. St f th Std f Aphbn nd ptl rptll Crlr Appndx I

Arial Maps of Research Site "A"

1940

1951

1955

1966

1977

Appendix II

Landowner Packet

dtrbtd b

Project Bog Turtle Endnrd Sp nd dnt rth Crln ndnr Knnth A rdl h A 15 199

A Sr f th drl Endnrd Sp At

An ndrtndn f ndnrd p nd th l dnd t prtt th r prtnt fr th prpr fntnn f n lnd nrvn r plnt nd nl p r n r rn nd trdhp f th rr prt f r n W l trv t r th prvt lndnr t hv th n vr n fr ftn prvnt th pbl fr rn th nrvtn rnztn h nrn f lndnr tht f th xtn f n ndnrd p dvrd n thr lnd rtrtn nd lnd- lttn ll b pd h blf lrl bd n l f nld nd ndrtndn f th l nd ntrprttn f t rrd Al n th rrnt lt f pltl nfrnttn th f ndnrd p prttn rhtrll hrd dbt ftn th lttl rrd fr th trth h flln drvd fr th rlvnt drl nd rth Crln l rrdn ndnrd p nd ttd brf r f th tn tht t drtl pt lndnr nd prvt lnd h Endnrd Sp At f 1973 (ESA r th At ndd rv th b fr th drl prr nd th dl fr t tt prr nldn rth Crln In th frt prrph f th At Cnr rnzd th vl f ndnrd p b ttn tht ndnrd p f fh ldlf nd plnt r f tht l rrtn dtnl htrl nd ntf vl t th ntn nd t ppl h vl nld rl dt nvrnntl hlth nd lt ndtr nd dtnl nd rrtnl pbl ntrt h At t p hn fr pln p n th t f Endnrd nd hrtnd Wldlf nd lnt It l dfn t f th pprprt tr n nn-b (fr xpl- endangered species is txn hh n dnr f xtntn thrht ll r nfnt prtn f t ntrl rn tn p prvd thd f trn nd plnnn fr h p rvr Eh ltn nvlv n lvl f rv b th pbl vrnnt n nd th ntf nt h At pr th US h nd Wldlf Srv nd tnl Mrn hr Srv t n prt nd nfrnt plnt rvr pln rnd rrh ntr ndnrd p ppltn nd prt th thr pbl nd prvt ntt t nrv ltd p h l t nr rvr t pnt hr th p n lnr nd prttn ndr th At An prtnt nd ftn vrld prvn f th At rr th Srtr f Intrr t ndr n nd thr t n th prttn pln fr h p hn dntn rtl hbtt h prvn prt bln btn t nd bnft f th rltr tn h jdnt rntl d t xld fr prttn 3 lln f 9 lln r f pttd l rtl hbtt n n ffrt t ln th pt n th ln ndtr

Wth rrd t ltd nl th At tt t lll t En n ntrtt r frn trd tht prt n ltd p ( - hr hr pr hnt ll trp llll tn ndnrd r thrtnd p Wth rrd t plnt th l tht t lll t En n ntrtt r frn trd tht prt v nd rd t pn h plnt fr fdrl lnd Mll d r dtr n h p n fdrl lnd v t d p d r dtr n ndnrd plnt n nn lnd n nn vltn f th l nldn trp

h x pnlt 55 nd/r 1 r n prn In ddtn th At rr fdrl n t dvlp prr t nrv ltd p nd prhbt th fr rrn t n tn tht ld jprdz th ntnd xtn f ltd p r dvrl df rtl hbtt h At l prtt p fr th ptntll hrfl tn f prvt lndnr vr th At ffr vrl flxbl tl fr rlvn nflt btn prvt lndnr nd ndnrd p r xpl prvt lndnr n lfll t ltd p f t ndntl t nd nt th prp f rrn t thr lfl tvt nd th lndnr plnt nrvtn pln fr th p Iplnttn f th At dnd t ftr rtv prtnrhp btn th prvt tr nd vrnnt n n th ntrt f ndnrd p nrvtn r 1979-199 thr r 1 drl prjt rvd fr pt n ndnrd p f th l thn 1 r fnd t nfntl pt n ndnrd p vrll vn thh prtlr prjt hv d ll dtrtn f ppltn nd nl 3 (3 f th dvlpnt prjt r tppd rlt f th ESA r fr bn n nprn trtjt tht t ppnnt prtr th ESA rplt th rrnt t bln th nd f ndnrd p nrvtn th prvt prprt nr nd dvlpr rvt dvlpr n btn fdrl prt t lll hr r vn ll ndnrd p n thr prprt prvdd th h tht th trd t nz thr pt n th p n thr A n ltt blnn f ndnrd p nd n thr xt th Endnrd Sp Ctt hh thrzd t xpt tvt fr th ESA hn th bnft f th prjt lrl th th nrvtn f p vn thh th ll rlt n th plt xtntn f p t th thr flxblt n th ESA nl thr hv vr bfr th tt h ndrln rlt tht rr p l thr rr bjt r vld b f thr rrt Mt f th ppl prtd ndr th Endnrd Sp At r ldlf trffr h llll nd nnl llt rr ldlf nd plnt t ll fr prnl prft h xtn f n ndnrd p n prvt prprt lll h n fft nl th lndnr (r n l plnnn prjt tht rr fdrl prt r fdrl fnd r tht ll lrl rlt n th lll tn f ltd p Evn hr prvt lndnr prprt dntd rtl hbtt fr n ndnrd p private landowners are not regulated by the ESA, only Federal actions that would adversely alter critical habitat. At th prnt t nl thr fh nd n plnt hv dntn f rtl hbtt n rth Crln nn r n th r rvd b th dnt nd Cnrvn Crrntl thr r 5 fdrll ltd plnt n r r nd nl

drll Endnrd r hrtnd lnt n r r

Sll-nthrd ttrr Cardamine micranthra Sth Cnflr Echinacea laevigata Shntz Snflr Helianthus schweinitzii Sll Whrld n Isotria medeoloides Wht Irtt Sisyrinchium dichotomum

drll Endnrd r hrtnd Anl n r r

Etrn Cr Fells concolor cougar (prbbl n lnr n th rn Krtlnd Wrblr Dendroica kirtlandii (nl rnt thrh th r ld El Haliaeetus leucocephalus d-dd Wdpr Picoides borealis hn rblr Vermivora bachmanii (lt n n th rl 19 pbl xtnt Cp r Shnr Notropis mekistocholas rrn lt Falco peregrinus (nl rnt thrh tn r Sr f rth Crln Endnrd Sp

Aftr th tblhnt f th ESA n tt dvlpd thr n ndnrd p l t dl th f ll r rnl rrt tht r nt rltd b th ntnl l rth Crln h rh dvrt f bl n hbtt rnn fr th ntn t th h tt h t rn tht r nhr l nd thr rn hr r tt nl prt f lrr rn It th pl f rrt tht r vrd b th rth Crln ndnrd p l

Anl: Un th fdrl Endnrd Sp At dl rth Crln ntd Gnrl Sttt 113-331 t 113-337 fftv 197 hh thrz th Wldlf r Cn t dvlp t t ntr nd prtt rr nl p n th tt h Cnn ndtd t ndrt rr nl p ltn nd dntn f rtl hbtt pn rndtn f th n Wldlf Advr Ctt h Cn thn rdnt th dvlpnt nd plnttn f nnt pln fr ltd p Chptr 39 (113 1995 f rth Crln ltn ndd th C n ndt t t nt ndrtn dr rn f nrvtn prttn nd nnt r tht b ppld t th p nd hbtt Ct f prttn n pt nd rnbl vlbl ptn fr nzn t nd dvr pt t b ndrd n h pln Mt prtntl t lndnr "n rl b dptd tht rtrt r dvlpnt f prvt prprt. h prttn f ndnrd nl n th tt ntll lr t th fdrl ESA n tht t trtd t lll trffn n rr nl nd prdt nd prttn f ntv ppltn fr phn ndnr n d lt nthn th nt th tt ltd rr p n thr prprt xpt p ll r ll th tht prt

lnt: h lnt rttn nd Cnrvtn At (Chptr 1 Artl 19; 1-; f th Gnrl Sttt f rth Crln thrz th rth Crln prtnt f Arltr t ntr nd prtt rr plnt p n th tt h ltn f plnt dn b th Cnr f Arltr t th rndtn f th rth Crln lnt Cnrvtn rd Upn ltn th Arltr prtnt rrd t r th thr tt n t ntr nd dvlp nnt pln fr h ltd p Crrntl th trl rt rr (vn f Envrnnt lth nd trl r ntn th dtb hh tr rr plnt ppltn nd th Arltr prtnt ntn lnt rttn Off fr th prp f nnt nd ll prttn f ntv plnt p n prl h lnt rttn Off l prt rrdn lltn prptn nd trd f rr plnt fr l t ntbl nn th fdrl ESA th l prrl d t prttn rr plnt fr th tn f lll trffr h llt th plnt fr prft nd t nz th pt f tt dvlpnt prjt n rr plnt ppltn In th tn tlnn th "nlfl t" pf ln nldd t prtt prvt prprt nr It tt tht th ndntl dtrbn f prttd plnt drn rltrl, frtr r dvlpnt prtn nt lll ln th plnt r nt lltd fr l r rl . r n th btt ln tht prvt prprt nr n d htvr th nt th th ntv rr plnt n thr lnd xpt ll th tht prt

h prprtn f th dnt d pbl th hlp nd dv fr th flln

Mrjr W r rth Crln prtnt f Arltr lnt Indtr vn lh C r A Mrd US h nd Wldlf Srv Ell Srv ld Off Ahvll C ndll C Wln rth Crln Wldlf r Cn vn f Wldlf Mnnt lh C S, I hv b trtl...

Q: Wht r b trtl A: trtl r n f th llt trtl n th rld h nhbt tlnd n trn rth Ar trtl hv bl t hn lrd hll nd dtntv rn t ll pt n th d f thr hd h vr dlt lnth 3 - 35 nh h tlnd th nhbt r ll ll d nd hv ft d trtl r vr rtv h rrl b n fll v l thr trtl h pnd t f thr t n th d t th prt f thr hll tn t t llt ht fr th n

Q: Wh r th pl A: h nbr f b trtl h drd nfntl h tl d t hbtt l nd lltn fr th pt trd f th dr n ppltn b trtl r rrntl ltd thrtnd r ndnrd n ll tt th nhbt tn thrtnd r ndnrd p lltn f th trtl lll

Q: Wh d ppl nt t td th A: On n prp n tdn b trtl t thr nfrtn t t n thr rvr th n b rvd fr th ltn In rdr t plh th nd t n r bt th trtl Sntt td th trtl t lrn bt thr lf l rtn nd hbtt h Wth th nfrtn n dtrn th bt t n b trtl t tht th trtl flrh

Q: Wht d t n t hv b trtl n prprt A: vn b trtl n r prprt vr pl r f ppl ll vr t t b trtl thr thn n ptvt Y hv th pprtnt t hlp prrv thrtnd p It d nt n tht r prprt n b tn fr

Q: Cn nn n prprt A: t r prprt h f r prprt t thr r dn

Q: Cn I tll prprt A: Y vn b trtl d nt fft r rht t th prprt In b trtl nhbt tlnd n ttl ptr r h fld Crrnt td r trn t dtrn f ttl rzn h bnfl fft fr b trtl It blvd tht nl rzn ntn th pn d r tht th trtl prfr

Q: Wht f I nt t drn tlnd A: fr ndr drnn r tlnd h t r ld nt vlt n tt r fdrl l r r ln USA bnft Mt f th tlnd tht b trtl nhbt r ll h th xpn f drnn th r ld fr th th fnnl bnft f hvn bt r ptr r fld

Q: Wht r th bnft f prttn b trtl A: hr r n bnft t prttn b trtl rttn b trtl hlp p th fr n xtnt Extntn nrl pr bt th rrnt rt f xtntn nntrll hh h t n f xtntn hbtt l -- n thr rd hn hv d th nfltd xtntn rt Sln th rt f xtntn prtnt b vr p pl prt n ntr Eh p tht lt fft th ntrl t Al t prtt b trtl t prtt th tlnd th nhbt Wtlnd prfr n fntn tht hv vl t hn nldn ldlf hbtt fld ntrl nd fltrn f plltnt nd dnt n th tr

Q: n I prtt b trtl A hr r n dffrnt t prtt b trtl prtt th b trtl t prtt thr hbtt - b hr r prrvtn prr dnd fr th prp f ldlf nd tlnd prttn nd rtrtn tht n ffr thnl tn Al nrvn nd lnd trt ffr n prrvtn ptn th fnnl bnft 1. What is a Meadow Bog? The term meadow bog is used to describe a mountain or piedmont wetland that has been altered by human use. Meadow bogs frequently occur on agricultural land, primarily in cattle pastures or hay fields. They are swampy or wet areas vegetated with sedges and shrubs. Although they may appear to be wastelands, meadow bogs are true wonderlands performing important functions which provide valuable benefits to humans. 2. What are their Values? • Flooding and Water Quality Meadow bogs are vital to the local water conditions. Meadow bogs can reduce flooding by holding excess water during storms. As a result, a bog recharges groundwater and reduces erosion and sedimentation. Groundwater recharge is an important process in maintaining the quality and quantity of well water. Erosion and sedimentation is reduced because meadow bogs decrease the velocity and amount of surface water flow, in turn reducing the amount of sediment that reaches streams and rivers. Additionally, they can act as sinks or filters of excess nutrients, pesticides and other pollutants. As a result, our streams and rivers stay cleaner and clearer. • Habitat for Wildlife When wetlands are altered, the composition of the animal and plant communities is changed. Many rare or unusual species inhabited wetlands that have since become meadow bogs. Some of these species include Gray's lilies, sundews, orchids, four-toed salamander and bog turtles. Even in meadow bogs, these unusual species often still exist. Another remarkable feature of meadow bogs is that some contain plant species that are generally exclusive to Northern wetlands; for example, cranberry and cottongrass. In some cases, human impacts maintain habitat. Bog turtles prefer more open areas, vegetated by sedges and rushes. Seasonal grazing and occasional mowing maintain this type of habitat by impeding the growth of trees and shrubs. Other more common but still important species inhabit meadow bogs. Numerous frogs and salamanders live in meadow bogs. Game wildlife such as white-tailed deer, wood ducks, snipe and woodcock also inhabit meadow bogs. Bogs also provide a food source in the winter when food is scarce. Furthermore, because wetlands keep streams and rivers clean, they help to maintain habitat for sport fish„ such as trout. 3. Why Preserve Meadow Bogs? North Carolina has lost more than half of its wetlands. The loss of bogs in particular has been even greater, with a loss of 90% in North Carolina. When the wetlands disappear so do the values and benefits that we acquire from them. The effects of the decrease in wetlands has been seen all over the country, including increased flooding, increased water contamination and a decrease in waterfowl, migratory birds, fish and other species that use wetlands. Because of the huge losses that have already occurred it is even more important to preserve those wetlands remaining. 4. What are the Preservation Options? There are many different ways to preserve meadow bogs. All preservation options are completely voluntary and many occur while maintaining private ownership and use of the land. In addition to the benefits derived from preserving a quickly disappearing natural resource in North Carolina, some methods of preservation have financial benefit to landowners. A few of the programs that assist in preservation are the Wetlands Reserve Program, Partners for Wildlife and the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program's registry and dedication. These programs were developed to help landowners preserve their natural resources and do not involve transfer of land ownership. The programs may provide information about the important natural resources on the property, develop a conservation plan and offer financial help. Other preservation options occur with the assistance of a conservancy or local land trust. Conservancies and land trusts are non- governmental, non-profit organizations created to preserve and restore natural resources. The objective of each organization is different. Local land trusts concentrate on a certain area or particular resource, such as a river or lake. Some larger organizations such as The Nature Conservancy, are primarily concerned with large, pristine sites around the world. There are many different preservation options that occur through conservancies and land trusts. Some methods of preserving natural resources include management agreements, conservation easements, leases, sales and donations. With any of these options the conservancy or land trust is responsible for preserving the natural assets of the land. Conservation easements, leases, sales and donations provide financial benefits to the landowner.

For further information on meadow bogs and preservation options contact your local Natural Resource Conservation Service office, US Fish and Wildlife Service office, or .

Project Bog Turtle North Carolina State Museum of Natural Science PO Box 29555 Raleigh, N.C. 27626-0555 phone: 919-733-7450 ext. 70 fax 919-733-1573 Methods of Preservation of Wetlands

. Wtlnd rv rr h Wtlnd rv rr (W tblhd t t fnnr th rtrtn nd prttn f tlnd h prr rnll rtd n th 199 d Arltr Cnrvtn nd rd At nd h bn ndd n th 1995 r ll h W nld rtrtn t-hr rnt thrt r r prptl nrvtn nt nd t-hrn fr rtrtn Al fr h tlnd n th prr nnt pln dvlpd b th trl r Cnrvtn Srv (CS nd US h nd Wldlf Srv (WS t d n thr rtrtn nd nnt Cntt: CS r WS 2. Wldlf btt Inntv rr h 199 r ll rtd th prr t hlp lndnr prv ldlf hbtt h prr prvd dn nd t-hr n fr rtrtn r dvlpnt f ldlf hbtt h prr tll n dvlpntl t Cntt: CS . rtnr fr Wldlf rtnr fr Wldlf US h nd Wldlf Srv (WS prr dvlpd t prtt ldlf thrh rtrtn nd prrvtn f hbtt S f th pnnt f th prr r hbtt nd rtrtn nnt thnl tn hbtt prttn prr nd dtn nd trh trtn t b vrd r hrd th th lndnr Cntt: WS 4. rth Crln trl rt rr h rth Crln trl rt rr (C dntrd b th vn f r nd rtn prtnt f Envrnnt lth nd trl r h ffr t fr f prttn fr ntrl r rtr nd ddtn tr f prprt th th trl rt rr vlntr nn-bndn rnt tht nld tht th lndnr ntnd t prtt th t nd pbl n th prprt t ntn t ntrl t dtn prnnt fr f prttn lr t nrvtn nt Cntt: 5 Cnrvn nd nd rt Cnrvn nd lnd trt r nnprft rnztn rtd t prrv nd rtr ntrl rr h p f h rnztn vr nl lnd trt f n ll r r pf rr fr xpl rvr r l S lrr rnztn h h tr Cnrvn r ntrtd n xptnl rr rnd th rld hr r n dffrnt prrvtn thd tht nvlv nrvn nd lnd trt In ddtn t th bnft f prttn ntrl rr f th ptn n hv fnnl bnft lln r brf drptn f f ptn • Management Agreements Mnnt rnt r d btn th lndnr nd nrvtn rnztn h rnt r tprr nd h dnd t ft th prtlr dr f th lndnr Mnnt rnt nvlv th dvlpnt f nrvtn pln hh plntd b th nrvtn rnztn r th lndnr • Conservation Easements Cnrvtn nt r vlntr ll rrnnt hh pf tht th prprt n tn n nl b d n tht prrv t ntrl t h r ll nd b nrvtn rnztn h nt tlrd t th dr f h lndnr Cnrvtn nt n hv n tx bnft h n rd fdrl n tx tt tx ft tx tt nhrtn tx nd t ll prprt tx Cnrvtn nt r ll prptl Althh tprr nt r pbl n t th tx bnft nl ppl t prptl nt • Leases f prprt t nrvtn rnztn r n dffrnt fr n thr prprt l h r tprr nd prvd n t th lndnr tht hn n nrhp h f th prprt b th nrvtn rnztn pfd thn th l • Sales Cnrvtn rnztn nrll hv ltd nt f fnd fr lnd tn f th fnnl ntrnt th ll prh prprt t rdd pr h lndnr rv n n tx rdtn b ln th dffrn btn th lln pr nd th fr rt vl hrtbl dntn Slln t rdd pr l rd ptl n tx b rdn th nt txd • Donations ntn prprt t nrvtn rnztn th t fftv thd f rdn tx h bnft nld fdrl n tx ddtn l t th fr rt vl f th lnd tt tx bnft nd vdn f ptl n tx h rth Crln Cnrvtn x Crdt rr l prt dllr fr dllr tt n tx rdt nd n n tx rdtn fr lrr ft Cntt: A nd rt r Cnrvn

lln lt f rnztn tht n prvd r nfrtn bt tlnd prttn thd nd hlp th prttn dn

Land Trusts and Conservancies Stale and National Groups

The Conservation Fund The National Wildlife Federation Sthtrn nl Off 11 Sxtnth Strt W 31 1/ W rnln St Whntn C 3 Chpl ll C 751 (77- (91997-3 Mln Addr The Nature Conservancy O x 37 rth Crln Off Chpl ll C 751 11 Unvrt r St 1 rh C 777 Conservation Trust for North Carolina (9193-55 O x 33333 lh C 73-3333 Trust for Public Land (919-199 Atlnt ld Off 17 htr Strt E National Audubon Society St 1 95 hrd Avn Atlnt GA 339 Yr Yr 1 (577-37 (13-3

Regional

Catawba Lands Conservancy Pacolet Area Conservancy (7375-3 O x 31 117 Et lvrd Clb C 7 St (79-31 Chrltt C 3 Highlands Land Trust Piedmont Land Conservancy O x 173 x 5 hlnd C 71 Grnbr C 7-5 (75-39 (9199-51

National Committee for the New River Southern Appalachian Highlands O x 1 Conservancy Glndl Sprn C 9 3 Wll St St (919-99 Ahvll C 1 (753-95 Natural Heritage Trust ofHenderson County O x Trust for Appalachian Trail Lands ndrnvll C 793- O x 7 (797-957 rbr rr Wt rn 55 (3535-331

Government Agencies Local Governments

Sl nd Wtr Cnrvtn trt

State Government

Division of Parks and Recreation Wildlife Resources Commission C prtnt f Envrnnt lth C prtnt f Envrnnt lth nd trl r nd trl r O x 77 51 Slbr Strt lh C 711 lh C 711 (919733-11 (919733-3391

Natural Heritage Program E-vn f r nd rtn O x 77 lh C 711 (919733-771

Federal Government

National Parks Service US Forest Service Untd tt prtnt f th Intrr Untd Stt prtnt f Arltr nl Off hrd ll ldn tnl rt n rth Crln 75 Sprn Strt O x 75 Atlnt GA 333 Ahvll C

US Fish and Wildlife Service Untd tt prtnt f th Intrr nl Off hrd ll ldn 75 Sprn Strt Atlnt GA 333 Appendix III

Sample Lease Agreement:

An agreement between landowners nd Project Bog Turtle CONSERVATION AGREEMENT AND LEASE

This is a conservation easement and lease between (Landowner) and NORTH CAROLINA HERPETOLOGICAL SOCIETY (Lessee).

WHEREAS, there lives on the property of Landowner a population of bog turtles, and the parties wish to enter into this Agreement for the purpose of protecting these turtles and the

special land on which they live.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises contained herein, the parties

agree as follows:

1. Term. This Agreement will be in force and effect for an initial period of

( ) years and may be extended for additional periods upon the agreement of the

parties.

2. The land over which this Agreement extends is located and described as

follows:

3. Payment. Lessee will pay to Landowner the sum of

Dollars ($ ) per year payable each

year in advance upon availability of funds.

4. Landowner will not willfully or knowingly use or permit others to use the land

in such a manner as will detrimentally affect the bog turtles that live there or their habitat.

The Landowner will not take or remove and will not grant permission to others to take or remove any bog turtles from the land. However, this section shall not prohibit the Lessee taking or removing bog turtles in furtherance of any conservation or recovery plan.

5. The Landowner hereby grants reasonable access to the land to Lessee, its members and others acting on its behalf for the purpose of studying and monitoring the bog turtles and for taking reasonable steps for their protection which are not inconsistent with the

Landowner's use of the property. The Lessee agrees to notify the Landowner before it or others acting on its behalf come onto the land pursuant to this Agreement if the Landowner so desires and requests such notification.

6. Any material breach of this Agreement due to the negligent or willful action of the Landowner which causes or threatens to cause injury or destruction to the bog turtles or their habitat shall entitle Lessee to recover from the Landowner part or all of any funds or material or equipment provided by Lessee to the Landowner pursuant to this Agreement.

7. Lessee agrees to hold the Landowner harmless for any personal injuries or death which occur to any of its members or others acting on its behalf which occur while on the premises.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement by their duly authorized representative.

Landowner

NORTH CAROLINA HERPETOLOGICAL SOCIETY, Lessee

By: Appendix IV

Locations of Turtles at Research Site "A" 1993-1998

Appndx

Plant Species List for Research Site "A"

provided by

Kenneth A. Bridle, Ph.D. PLANT SPECIES LIST rh St "A" Cplx Cpld b Knnth A rdl Ph.

Cnt p/tn H= fld R= prn (ln r Opn np r Cld np r