DOCSLIB.ORG

Print Version (Pdf)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Print Version (Pdf) Special Collections and University Archives UMass Amherst Libraries Mitzi Bowman Papers 1925-2008 (Bulk: 1976-2008) 10 boxes (14 linear ft.) Call no.: MS 761 About SCUA SCUA home Credo digital Scope Overview Series 1: Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant Series 2: Nuclear Economics Series 3: Environmental Impacts Series 4: Nuclear Management Series 5: Health Effects Series 6: Anti-Nuclear Activism Inventory Series 1: Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant Series 2: Nuclear Economics Series 3: Environmental Impacts Series 4: Nuclear Management Series 5: Health Effects Series 6: Anti-Nuclear Activism Admin info Download xml version print version (pdf) Read collection overview For years, Mitzi Bowman and her husband Pete were stalwarts of the progressive community in Connecticut, and tireless activists in the movements for social justice, peace, and the environment. Shortly after their marriage in 1966, the Bowman's settled in Newtown and then in Milford, Conn., where Pete worked as an engineer and where Mitzi had trouble finding employment due to her outspoken ways. In close collaboration, the couple became ardent opponents of the war in Vietnam as well as opponents of nuclear weaponry. The focus of their activism took a new direction in 1976, when they learned of plans to ship spent nuclear fuel rods near their home. Founding their first antinuclear organization, STOP (Stop the Transport of Pollution), they forced the shipments to be rerouted, and they soon devoted themselves to shutting down nuclear power in Connecticut completely, including the Millstone and Connecticut Yankee facilities, the latter of which was decommissioned in 1996. The Bowmans were active in a wide array of other groups, including the New Haven Green Party, the Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone, the People's Action for Clean Energy (PACE), and they were founding members of Fight the (Utility Rate) Hike, the Progressive Action Roundtable, and Don't Waste Connecticut. Two years after Pete died on Feb. 14, 2006 at the age of 78, Mitzi relocated to Vermont, carrying on her activism. The Bowman Papers center on Mitzi and Pete Bowman's antinuclear activism, dating from their first forays with STOP in the mid- 1970s through the growth of opposition to Vermont Yankee in the approach to 2010. The collection offers a valuable glimpse into the early history of grassroots opposition to nuclear energy and the Bowmans' approach to organizing and their connections with other antinuclear activists and to the peace and environmental movements are reflected in an extensive series of notes, press releases, newsclippings, talks, ephemera, and correspondence. The collections also includes extensive subject files on radiation, nuclear energy, peace, and related topics. Background on Mitzi Bowman For years, Mitzi Bowman and her husband Pete were stalwarts of the progressive community in Connecticut, and tireless activists in the movements for social justice, peace, and the environment. Shortly after their marriage in 1966, the Bowman's settled in Newtown and then in Milford, Conn., where Pete worked as an engineer and where Mitzi had trouble finding employment due to her outspoken ways. In close collaboration, the couple became ardent opponents of the war in Vietnam as well as opponents of nuclear weaponry. The focus of their activism took a new direction in 1976, when they learned of plans to ship spent nuclear fuel rods near their home. Founding their first antinuclear organization, STOP (Stop the Transport of Pollution), they forced the shipments to be rerouted, and they soon devoted themselves to shutting down nuclear power in Connecticut completely, including the Millstone and Connecticut Yankee facilities, the latter of which was decommissioned in 1996. The Bowmans were active in a wide array of other groups, including the New Haven Green Party, the Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone, the People's Action for Clean Energy (PACE), and they were founding members of Fight the (Utility Rate) Hike, the Progressive Action Roundtable, and Don't Waste Connecticut. Two years after Pete died on Feb. 14, 2006 at the age of 78, Mitzi relocated to Vermont, carrying on her activism. Scope of collection The Bowman Papers center on Mitzi and Pete Bowman's antinuclear activism, dating from their first forays with STOP in Mitzi Bowman the mid-1970s through the growth of opposition to Vermont Yankee in the approach to 2010. The collection offers a valuable glimpse into the early history of grassroots opposition to nuclear energy and the Bowmans' approach to organizing and their connections with other antinuclear activists and to the peace and environmental movements are reflected in an extensive series of notes, press releases, news clippings, talks, ephemera, and correspondence. The collections also includes extensive subject files on radiation, nuclear energy, peace, and related topics. Series descriptions Series 1: Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant 1989-2002 Court documents relating to the investigation of the proposed sale of Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant, including petitions, appeals, and motions. The series also has correspondence between the parties involved in the case. Series 2: Nuclear Economics 1972-2010 Investigates the economic costs of nuclear energy through news articles, fact sheets, and publications. Series 3: Environmental Impacts 1969-2007 Environmentalist articles and publications about the negative impacts of nuclear energy on the environment. The series also offers articles on energy alternatives. Series 4: Nuclear Management 1925-2008 (bulk1976-2008) Information from state regulatory commissions and legislatures on the regulation, management, transportation, storage, and maintenance of nuclear activities. Series 5: Health Effects 1976-2008 News articles and publications on the health effects nuclear energy and radiation has on humans. Series 6: Anti-Nuclear Activism 1974-2008 Organizational information on anti-nuclear and environmental activist groups and their correspondence, mailing lists, membership forms, and flyers. Correspondence and news clippings show their efforts to prevent nuclear energy and radioactivity in the United States with emphasis on Connecticut. Inventory Series 1: Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant 1989-2002 Amended Agreement Between Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station and Green Mountain Power Corporation 1989-2002 Box 1: 1 Articles: Vermont Yankee 2001-2002 Box 1: 2 Assignment of Rights to Excess Decommissioning Funds 2002 Box 1: 3 Central Vermont Public Service 2001 Box 1: 4 Citizens' Energy Project: Solar Power System undated Box 1: 5 Conservation Law Foundation 2001-2002 Box 1: 6 Conservation Law Foundation: Public Service Board Discovery Requests 2001 Box 1: 7 Correspondence 2001-2002 Box 1: 8 Correspondence: Susan M. Hudson 2001-2002 Box 1: 9 Dumont and Lee, P.C: Discovery Questions and File Requests 2001 Box 1: 10 Entergy Nuclear Vermont, LLC: Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Temporary Restraining Order 2001 Box 1: 11 Green Mountain Power Corporation: Petition for Regulatory Approvals 2002 Box 1: 12 Green Mountain Power: Service Quality and Reliability Performance Quarterly Report 2002 Box 1: 13 Investigation of Vermont Yankee Sale: Appellant's Brief 2002 Box 1: 14 Investigation of Vermont Yankee Sale: Certificate of Service 2002 Box 1: 15 Investigation of Vermont Yankee Sale: Discovery Requests 2000-2002 Box 1: 16 Investigation of Vermont Yankee Sale: Docketing Statement of Appellant 2002 Box 1: 17 Investigation of Vermont Yankee Sale: Docket Log 2001-2002 Box 1: 18 Investigation of Vermont Yankee Sale: Docket Service List 2001-2002 Box 1: 19 Investigation of Vermont Yankee Sale: Memorandums 2001-2002 Box 1: 20 Investigation of Vermont Yankee Sale: Motions to Dismiss 2001-2002 Box 1: 21 Investigation of Vermont Yankee Sale: Motions for Extension of Time 2001-2002 Box 1: 22 Investigation of Vermont Yankee Sale: Motions to Intervene 2001-2002 Box 1: 23 Investigation of Vermont Yankee Sale: Motions for Leave 2001-2002 Box 1: 24 Investigation of Vermont Yankee Sale: Motions for Special Protective Order 2001 Box 1: 25 Investigation of Vermont Yankee Sale: Motions for Stay Pending Appeal 2001 Box 1: 26 Investigation of Vermont Yankee Sale: Motions to Respond 2001-2002 Box 1: 27 Investigation of Vermont Yankee Sale: Notices of Appeal 2001-2002 Box 1: 28 Investigation of Vermont Yankee Sale: Notices of Appearance 2001-2002 Box 1: 29 Investigation of Vermont Yankee Sale: Notices of Depositions 2001-2002 Box 1: 30 Investigation of Vermont Yankee Sale: Notices of Hearings 2001-2002 Box 1: 31 Investigation of Vermont Yankee Sale: Order Denying Complaint 2002 Box 1: 32 Investigation of Vermont Yankee Sale: Order Granting Motion to Amend Complaint 2002 Box 1: 33 Investigation of Vermont Yankee Sale: Responses to Motions 2001-2002 Box 1: 34 Investigation of Vermont Yankee Sale: Stipulations and Proposed Orders 2001-2002 Box 1: 35 Investigation of Vermont Yankee Sale: Testimonies 2001-2002 Box 1: 36 Jim Dumont: Correspondences on Vermont Yankee 2001-2002 Box 1: 37 Jonathan M. Block: Investigation into Vermont Yankee Proposed Sale 2001-2002 Box 1: 38 Jonathan M. Block: Vermont Yankee Request to Withdraw Exhibit 2002 Box 1: 39 Law Offices of Brian Lederer: Initial Brief of International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 300 2002 Box 1: 40 New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution 2002 Box 1: 41 New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution: Supreme Court Appeal 2002 Box 1: 42 New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution: Statement
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Addressing the Gap: a Federal, State, Tribal and Local Partnership
    Addressing the Gaps: Association of State Wetland Mangers, Inc. By Jon A. Kusler, Ph.D. Prepared for: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Wetlands Division Revised, October 1, 2004 Addressing the Gaps: A FEDERAL, STATE, TRIBAL AND LOCAL PARTNERSHIP FOR WETLAND REGULATION Prepared for: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Wetlands Division By: Jon Kusler, Esq., Ph.D. Available from the: Association of State Wetland Managers, Inc. 1434 Helderberg Trail Berne, NY 12023 518-872-1804; Fax: 518-872-2171; [email protected] Limited hard copies: $20 Limited copies on CD: $5 Please visit our website to access this and other reports at http://www.aswm.org Direct site: http://www.aswm.org/propub/statepartnership.pdf BASIS FOR REPORT The report draws upon an earlier report of the same title prepared by Jon Kusler for the Association of State Wetland Managers. It draws upon the many wetland workshops and symposia that the Association of State Wetland Managers has conducted over the last decade (See Appendix A); it draws upon a review of the general wetland literature (See bibliography); and, it draws upon supplemental research carried out specifically for the report. The report reflects a series of issue papers prepared by the Association of Wetland Managers over the last decade. Finally, the report draws upon the author’s experience working with wetlands, floodplains, coastal areas, lakes, and other water-related resource systems at all levels of government over several decades. See e.g., J. Kusler, Regulating Sensitive Lands, Ballinger, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1985; J. Kusler et al., Vol. 1, 2, 3, Regulation of Flood Hazard Areas to Reduce Flood Losses, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Mile Island Alert Newsletters, 1980
    Dickinson College Archives & Special Collections http://archives.dickinson.edu/ Three Mile Island Resources Title: Three Mile Island Alert Newsletters, 1980 Date: 1980 Location: TMI-TMIA Contact: Archives & Special Collections Waidner-Spahr Library Dickinson College P.O. Box 1773 Carlisle, PA 17013 717-245-1399 [email protected] SLAND i 1 V i Three Mile Island Alert February, 1980 Cobalt & Turkeys Collide by MikeT Klinger late Sunday evening, January 13, treatment of radiation exposure on 1-80 north of Pittsburgh, a These reports, she assured me, tractor trailer carrying radio­ were inaccurate. active cobalt pellets destined Alot of questions remain for use in. a NYC hospital collided unanswered. Why was the story with a trailer load of turkeys. played down so quickly? Why did On Monday morning WHP news the leaking cannister later_____ initially reported a broken cannister was emitting substantial amounts of radiation, .65 Rem/hr. to 4.0 Rem/hr.--"a major health hazard," according to Warren Bassett, administrator of nearby Brookville Hospital. WHP's coverage of the accident decreased and by mid-morning, ’ the story was no longer broadcast. A fifteen-mile stretch of 1-80 was closed off as state police waited for a DER radiation become "a crack in the trailer expert before getting close compartment"? Why was there su< to the truck. The DER expert a large discrepancy in the was stranded due to bad weather figures? Why and how did a and didn't get to the scene "major health hazard" in the until later in the day. The morning become "slight" by the initial dangerous readings of time it hit the Evening News? .65 R/hr.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral History Center University of California the Bancroft Library Berkeley, California
    Oral History Center, The Bancroft Library, University of California Berkeley Oral History Center University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California East Bay Regional Park District Oral History Project Judy Irving: A Life in Documentary Film, EBRPD Interviews conducted by Shanna Farrell in 2018 Copyright © 2019 by The Regents of the University of California Interview sponsored by the East Bay Regional Park District Oral History Center, The Bancroft Library, University of California Berkeley ii Since 1954 the Oral History Center of the Bancroft Library, formerly the Regional Oral History Office, has been interviewing leading participants in or well-placed witnesses to major events in the development of Northern California, the West, and the nation. Oral History is a method of collecting historical information through tape-recorded interviews between a narrator with firsthand knowledge of historically significant events and a well-informed interviewer, with the goal of preserving substantive additions to the historical record. The tape recording is transcribed, lightly edited for continuity and clarity, and reviewed by the interviewee. The corrected manuscript is bound with photographs and illustrative materials and placed in The Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley, and in other research collections for scholarly use. Because it is primary material, oral history is not intended to present the final, verified, or complete narrative of events. It is a spoken account, offered by the interviewee in response to questioning, and as such it is reflective, partisan, deeply involved, and irreplaceable. ********************************* All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreement between The Regents of the University of California and Judy Irving dated December 6, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Reel Impact: Movies and TV at Changed History
    Reel Impact: Movies and TV Õat Changed History - "Õe China Syndrome" Screenwriters and lmmakers often impact society in ways never expected. Frank Deese explores the "The China Syndrome" - the lm that launched Hollywood's social activism - and the eect the lm had on the world's view of nuclear power plants. FRANK DEESE · SEP 24, 2020 Click to tweet this article to your friends and followers! As screenwriters, our work has the capability to reach millions, if not billions - and sometimes what we do actually shifts public opinion, shapes the decision-making of powerful leaders, perpetuates destructive myths, or unexpectedly enlightens the culture. It isn’t always “just entertainment.” Sometimes it’s history. Leo Szilard was irritated. Reading the newspaper in a London hotel on September 12, 1933, the great Hungarian physicist came across an article about a science conference he had not been invited to. Even more irritating was a section about Lord Ernest Rutherford – who famously fathered the “solar system” model of the atom – and his speech where he self-assuredly pronounced: “Anyone who expects a source of power from the transformation of these atoms is talking moonshine.” Stewing over the upper-class British arrogance, Szilard set o on a walk and set his mind to how Rutherford could be proven wrong – how energy might usefully be extracted from the atom. As he crossed the street at Southampton Row near the British Museum, he imagined that if a neutron particle were red at a heavy atomic nucleus, it would render the nucleus unstable, split it apart, release a lot of energy along with more neutrons shooting out to split more atomic nuclei releasing more and more energy and..
    [Show full text]
  • Public Citizen Copyright © 2016 by Public Citizen Foundation All Rights Reserved
    Public Citizen Copyright © 2016 by Public Citizen Foundation All rights reserved. Public Citizen Foundation 1600 20th St. NW Washington, D.C. 20009 www.citizen.org ISBN: 978-1-58231-099-2 Doyle Printing, 2016 Printed in the United States of America PUBLIC CITIZEN THE SENTINEL OF DEMOCRACY CONTENTS Preface: The Biggest Get ...................................................................7 Introduction ....................................................................................11 1 Nader’s Raiders for the Lost Democracy....................................... 15 2 Tools for Attack on All Fronts.......................................................29 3 Creating a Healthy Democracy .....................................................43 4 Seeking Justice, Setting Precedents ..............................................61 5 The Race for Auto Safety ..............................................................89 6 Money and Politics: Making Government Accountable ..............113 7 Citizen Safeguards Under Siege: Regulatory Backlash ................155 8 The Phony “Lawsuit Crisis” .........................................................173 9 Saving Your Energy .................................................................... 197 10 Going Global ...............................................................................231 11 The Fifth Branch of Government................................................ 261 Appendix ......................................................................................271 Acknowledgments ........................................................................289
    [Show full text]
  • But Public Citizen Still Fights for Consumers
    A lot has changed since 1971 ... n that year ... the Watergate was still just a little-known hotel in Washington ... people drove sta- tion wagons, not SUVs ... passengers could smoke on airplanes ... nuclear Ipower was flourishing ... and a first-class stamp cost 6 cents. Public Citizen has changed, too. From our founding in 1971 by consumer advocate Ralph Nader, we have grown into a potent countervailing force to the might of Corporate America. Today, we are larger and stronger than ever. But what hasn’t changed are the traits that have served us well: independence, per- sistence, vigilance. We’ve been the eyes and ears — and sometimes the teeth — of consumers through the administrations of six presidents and through 15 Congresses. We were born in an era of activism, during a But Public Citizen period when the Con- gress was creating Still Fights for important new agencies — the Environmental Protection Agency, the Occupational Consumers Safety and Health Administration, the Consumer Product Safety Commission, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration — to mitigate the health and safety risks posed by our industrial society. Since that time, we’ve withstood a withering corporate backlash against consumer protection. But we have been uncompromising in our fight for safer products, for government and corporate accountability, for clean elections, for a strong and vibrant civil justice system, and for clean and safe energy. We have evolved with the times, keeping our core values while moving into new arenas, such as globalization and electricity deregulation now devastating California consumers. Public Citizen has won many battles for consumers.
    [Show full text]
  • Ralph Nader, Founder 215 Pennsylvania Ave SE
    Buyers Up · Congress Watch · Critical Mass · Global Trade Watch · Health Research Group · Litigation Group Joan Claybrook, President December 15, 2003 Dr. Margo Schwab Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs Office of Management and Budget NEOB Room 10201 725 17th Street, NW Washington, DC 20503 [email protected] Re: Proposed Bulletin on Peer Review and Information Quality 68 FR 54023 Dear Dr. Schwab: Public Citizen is a national non-profit consumer advocacy organization with over 150,000 members. We are writing in response to the September 15, 2003 notice in the Federal Register requesting comments on the Proposed Bulletin on Peer Review and Information Quality [“Proposed Bulletin”] issued by the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget [“OMB/OIRA”]. These comments should be read in conjunction with the remarks made at the National Academy of Sciences Workshop1 [“NAS Workshop”] on November 18, 2003, by Public Citizen Attorney Alan B. Morrison. Because the new procedures would create constraints on regulatory functioning that are unnecessary, improvident and costly, we urge that the Proposed Bulletin be withdrawn. The essential issue presented by this proposal is not whether peer review should be expanded or improved; it is whether this particular proposal bears the hallmarks of a sincere interest in science or is instead an exercise in regulatory obstructionism. As our detailed comments below demonstrate, in this proposal OMB/OIRA has consistently taken the path that will predictably favor regulated industry and introduce potentially massive costs and delay, thus injecting paralysis by analysis into the regulatory process. 1 “Peer Review Standards for Regulatory Science and Technical Information,” Science, Technology, and Law Program, The National Academies, November 18, 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Mf-$0.65 Hc$13.16
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 058 710 EM 009 437 AUTHOR Sachs, David Peter; Rubin, David Mark TITLE Mass Media and the Environment: Volume Two, The Environmental information Explosion: The Press Discovers the Environment. INSTITUTION Stanford Univ., Calif. Dept. of Communication..; Stanford Univ., Calif. School of Medicine. SPONS AGENCY National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C. PUB DATE Sep 71 NOTE 322p. EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC$13.16 DESCRIPTORS *Ecology; Environmental Criteria; *Environmental Education; Environmental Research; *Information Dissemination; *Mass Media; *News Media; Newspapers; Radio; Social Responsibility; Television IDENTIFIERS *San Francisco Bay Area ABSTRACT In an interdisciplinary study the role of the news media in environmental problems is examined. A description of the environmental problems of the San Francisco Bay Area and of the many news media which serve this area introduces this second volume of the study. The dimensions of the information explosion in the Bay Area news media are documented in quantitative terms. The study identifies the groups in the Bay Area which can be expected to use the information offered by the news media and the implications of this for the press. The difficulties for the press in reporting environmental deterioration and the damage caused by "environmental" advertising are pointed out. The study also examined: the difficulties of gaining access to information about the plans of public utilities; the interrelationship of a growing community and its newspapers and the possible effects of newspaper coverage of urban land use patterns; and the possibilities of getting along without the news media and becoming informed on one's own. The study concludes that the media have alerted the public to environmental hazards, but that continued efforts topinpointlocal problems will be necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Citizen, Inc. and San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace V
    NO. 07-71868 and NO. 07-72555 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PUBLIC CITIZEN, INC. and SAN LUIS OBISPO MOTHERS FOR PEACE, Petitioners, V. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents. "and NUCLEAR ENERGY INSTITUTE, Intervenor-Respondeit, THE STATE OF NEW YORK Petitioner, V. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents. BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE EDMUND G. BROWN JR.,, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER STATE .OFNEW•ORK EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Attorney. General of the State of California JANET GAARD, Acting Chief Assistant Attorney General . THEODORA BERGER, SeniorAssistant Attorney -General SUSAN DURBIN, BRIAN HEM[BACHER, Deputy Attorneys General 300 SpringStreet,.gSuth Suite 1702 Los Angeles, CA 90013 Telephone: (213) 897-2638 Facsimile: (213) 897-2802 Attorneys for Amici Curiae TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ............................ ....................... 1 INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE ....................................... 6 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ........................................ 7 A RG UM EN T ............................... ...................... 10 I. THE NRC'S RESPONSE TO THE PETITION VIOLATES THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT BECAUSE THE REASONS IT GIVES FOR DENYING THE PETITION ARE NOT RATIONAL, BUT ARE ARBITRARY AND CAPRICIOUS AND NOT DIRECTED TO THE PETITION'S REQUEST .......................... ......... 10 A. The Design Basis Threat Rule Is Not Rational in That it Does Not Address NRC's Statutory Responsibilities .................... 10 B. The NRC Has Violated the Administrative Procedure Act by Failing to Directly Address the Relief Requested in the Petition ......... 15 II. THE NRC HAS ACTED ARBITRARILY AND CAPRICIOUSLY IN NOT COMPLYING WITH THE DIRECTION OF CONGRESS IN THE ENERGY POLICY ACT OF 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • A Look Into the Campaign to Retire the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station
    SIT Graduate Institute/SIT Study Abroad SIT Digital Collections Capstone Collection SIT Graduate Institute 2011 Safe Power Vermont: A Look Into The aC mpaign To Retire The eV rmont Yankee Nuclear Power Station. Dylan M. Kreis SIT Graduate Institute Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/capstones Part of the Civic and Community Engagement Commons, Energy Policy Commons, Energy Systems Commons, and the Environmental Policy Commons Recommended Citation Kreis, Dylan M., "Safe Power Vermont: A Look Into The aC mpaign To Retire The eV rmont Yankee Nuclear Power Station." (2011). Capstone Collection. 2473. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/capstones/2473 This Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by the SIT Graduate Institute at SIT Digital Collections. It has been accepted for inclusion in Capstone Collection by an authorized administrator of SIT Digital Collections. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Safe Power Vermont: A look into the campaign to retire the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station. Dylan M. Kreis PIM 68 A Capstone Paper submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Master of Sustainable Development at the SIT Graduate Institute In Brattleboro, Vermont USA. Capstone Seminar July 26, 2011 Advisor: Nikoi Kote-Nikoi Page 1 of 43 Consent to Use of Capstone I hereby grant permission for World Learning to publish my Capstone on its websites and in any of its digital/electronic collections, and to reproduce and transmit my CAPSTONE ELECTRONICALLY. I understand that World Learning’s websites and digital collections are publicly available via the Internet. I agree that World Learning is NOT responsible for any unauthorized use of my Capstone by any third party who might access it on the Internet or otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • Tritium Investigation Report 2011 DECEMBER
    Tritium Investigation Report 2011 The following information was presented on the Health Department website to inform the public about an investigation into radioactive contamination from the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant in 2011. To view maps and diagrams related to this investigation, see our Investigation Graphics document. DECEMBER: December 21, 2011 Tritium Detected Again in Connecticut River Water The Vermont Department of Health Laboratory analysis of a water sample from the Connecticut River has again detected tritium. This sample was taken from the river on November 3 and had a tritium concentration of 1,120 picocuries per liter (pCi/L). No other radionuclides were detected. The Connecticut River samples were pumped from a hose below the surface of the water next to the shoreline where the plume of tritium-contaminated groundwater is moving into the river. River water samples obtained on July 18, July 25, and August 8, 2011 from the same location were also positive for tritium. Tritium concentrations in those samples were 534 pCi/L, 611 pCi/L, and 565 pCi/L respectively. To date, no other radionuclides that could have originated from Vermont Yankee have been detected in river water. The Health Department immediately sent the water sample to its contract laboratory to be analyzed for hard-to- detect radioactive materials including strontium-90. Confirmatory gamma spectroscopy and analysis for tritium will also be done. The Health Department contacted Vermont Yankee to find out if their split of the river water sample had been analyzed. Vermont Yankee informed the Health Department on Tuesday, December 20 that its sample was also positive for tritium at a concentration of 1,230 pCi/L.
    [Show full text]
  • Package of Six Comments Opposing Proposed Rule
    /- 1 | 4 J0CKET NUMBER . | 8 monwn gg - d(/ |' ' - ,_ WALBRIDGE J. POWELL [62 g-' .n: I ENGINEER & GEOLOGIST (206) 232- 5295 w 4314 island crest way mercer island,WA 98040 JUNE 23,1987 * 7 JUN 29 P2 :21 d SECRETARY A/OTE $ /VS0 YI /Q usNRC defnhoh n menp#&& 9' 1 WASHINGTON K 23 55 a '' ! i ATIN: DOCKETIfG AND A ND SERVICE BRANCH | 1 GENTLEENJ SUBJECT: INTENTION OF Tm NRC TO REVISE THE DEFINITION OF " HIGHtEVEL ! RADICACTIVE WASTE." l REQUEST THAT 'YOU CEASE AND DESIST IN YOUR EFFORTS TO LIBERALIZE THE DEFINITION OF HIGH L'EVEL RADI0ACTIVELIT WOULD ONLY RESULT IN DISASTROUS EXPOSURE OF THE POPULATION TO RADICACTIVITY. 1 ALL OF THE RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE THAT IS CURRENTLY CONSIDERED "HIGH1EVEL" SHOULD ret %IN IN M AT CATEGORY. SOE OF THE RADICACTIVE WASTE CURRENTLY CONSIDERED '" LOW 1EVEL" SHOULD BE PLACED IN THE "HIGHtEVEL CATEGORY". NRC SH0llD CONSIDER t%TERIALS THAT ARE EITHER LOJG-LIVED OR HIGH Y RADICACTIVE OR BOTH AS"HIGH-LEVELRADIDACTIVEWASTE".TEYSWULDNOTNEEDTOBEBOTH. 4 ETHER IT IS TERMED "HIGHtEVEL, "LovtEVEL", TRANSURANIC, OR SOE OTHER DESIGNATION, ALL WASTE SHOULD BE ISOLATED FOR AS LONG AS IT ret % INS HAZARDOUS. CURRENT LAWS.AND REGULATIONS DO NOT REQUIRE ALL HIGH LEVEL WASTE GO TO TK HIGH LEVEL WASTE DlNP THAT MAY SOE DAY BE ESTAB.!SKD. IDR IS IT NECESSARY THAT WASTE BE CLASSIFIED AS HIGHtEVEL IN ORDER TO BE PLACED THERE. ITiDOES SEEM LOGICAL, HWEVER, TO CATEGORIZE ALL L0tG-LIVED WASTE AS HIGH LEVEL SO AS NOTTDMINIMIZEITSHAZARD.THISREDEFINITIONSHOULDNOTREQUIREOVERAPONTHTOIMPLEMEMT. IT 1%S COME TO MY. ATTENTION WHILE READING NUREGM REPORT TO CONGRESS ON ABtORt%L @CURRENCES AND f0 REG /BR@51 PtMER REACTOR EVENTS THE THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY C0fNISSION HAS ' BEEN EXCEEDINGLY LAX''IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF CURRENT REGULATIONS WHICH ARE tOCP ' AND NARROW IN TEIR SCOPE.
    [Show full text]