Third-Party Litigation Funding and Claim Transfer

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Third-Party Litigation Funding and Claim Transfer THE ARTS This PDF document was made available from www.rand.org as a public CHILD POLICY service of the RAND Corporation. CIVIL JUSTICE EDUCATION ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Jump down to document6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS NATIONAL SECURITY The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research POPULATION AND AGING organization providing objective analysis and effective PUBLIC SAFETY solutions that address the challenges facing the public SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY and private sectors around the world. SUBSTANCE ABUSE TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Support RAND WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND Institute for Civil Justice View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation conference proceedings series. RAND conference proceedings present a collection of papers delivered at a conference or a summary of the conference. The material herein has been vetted by the conference attendees and both the introduction and the post-conference material have been re- viewed and approved for publication by the sponsoring research unit at RAND. ConferenCe ProCeedings Third-Party Litigation funding and Claim Transfer Trends and implications for the Civil Justice system Geoffrey McGovern • Neil Rickman • Joseph W. Doherty • Fred Kipperman Jamie Morikawa • Kate Giglio This conference was convened by the UCLA-RAND Center for Law and Public Policy. The conference and these proceedings were made possible by the generous support of Juridica Capital Management Limited, Burford Advisors LLC, Patton Boggs LLC, Oxbridge Financial Group LLC, IM Litigation Funding, and supporters of the UCLA-RAND Center for Law and Public Policy. The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research organization providing objective analysis and effective solutions that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors around the world. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. R® is a registered trademark. © Copyright 2010 RAND Corporation. Portions of this document, the presentations entitled “Fee Regimes” and “Litigation Markets and Litigation Accuracy,” are used by RAND under license from the copyright owners. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND documents to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND documents are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND permissions page (http://www.rand.org/publications/ permissions.html). Published 2010 by the RAND Corporation 1776 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050 4570 Fifth Avenue, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2665 RAND URL: http://www.rand.org To order RAND documents or to obtain additional information, contact Distribution Services: Telephone: (310) 451-7002; Fax: (310) 451-6915; Email: [email protected] Preface On June 2, 2009, the UCLA-RAND Center for Law and Public Policy convened a conference in Santa Monica, California, on third-party litigation funding and claim transfer. The UCLA- RAND conference was the first ever in the United States to address this topic. The conference brought together members of academia and the nonprofit sector, stakeholders from the legal industry (including representatives from plaintiff and defense firms), and leaders from the liti- gation finance industry to discuss this field of finance and explore its implications for the civil justice system of the United States and other countries. These UCLA-RAND conference proceedings summarize the key issues presented by the panelists and speakers. Supplemental materials, including briefing slides and invited papers and speeches that were written in advance and distributed at the conference, are included, unedited, in two appendixes. This volume should be of interest to participants in the legal services industry, as well as researchers and policymakers who examine the business aspects of litigation and effects of litigation finance on issues of social concern. The conference and these proceedings were made possible by the generous support of Juridica Capital Management Limited, Burford Advisors LLC, Patton Boggs LLC, Oxbridge Financial Group LLC, IM Litigation Funding, and supporters of the UCLA-RAND Center for Law and Public Policy. The mission of the UCLA-RAND Center for Law and Public Policy is to inform legal and public policymakers with innovative legal scholarship grounded in multidisciplinary empirical analysis. The center fosters collaborative research, holds conferences, and trains law students in the Empirical Legal Scholars program. It is the first center of its kind to create a partnership between a law school and a major nonprofit research institute. Founded in 1949, the University of California, Los Angeles, School of Law is the young- est major law school in the nation and has established a tradition of innovation in its approach to teaching, research, and scholarship. Founded more than 60 years ago, the RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research orga- nization providing objective analysis and effective solutions that address the challenges that public and private sectors around the world are facing. For more information about the center and its research, contact the following directors: Joseph W. Doherty Director, Empirical Research Group University of California, Los Angeles, School of Law 385 Charles E. Young Drive East 1242 Law Building iii iv Third-Party Litigation Funding and Claim Transfer: Trends and Implications for the Civil Justice System Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476 310-206-2675 Fax: 310-206-6489 [email protected] James N. Dertouzos Director, RAND Institute for Civil Justice 1776 Main Street Santa Monica, CA 90406-2138 310-393-0411 x7476 Fax: 310-451-6979 [email protected] Contents Preface ........................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgments ............................................................................................. vii Chapter One Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1 Chapter twO Opening remarks and Framing the Central Issues ...................................................... 3 Litigation’s Purpose, Shortcomings, and the Desirability of More Litigation ............................ 3 Stakeholders and Products in Third-Party Funding Arrangements ........................................ 4 Chapter three Session One: The Current Landscape—Funding Claims in the United States ..................... 7 Fee Regimes ....................................................................................................... 7 Insurance and Litigation Funding ............................................................................. 8 Lawyer Investments in Claims ................................................................................. 9 Chapter Four Session two: Litigation Markets, Participants, and the Structure of Claim Investments ....... 11 Sources and Structures of Claim Investments ............................................................... 11 Litigation Markets and Litigation Accuracy ................................................................. 12 Chapter FIve Session Three: rules, regulations, and ethical Considerations of Third-Party Funding ....... 15 Professional Ethical Issues in Third-Party Litigation Financing........................................... 15 Third-Party Finance: Legal Risk and Its Implications ...................................................... 18 Financing and Firm Management ............................................................................ 19 Chapter SIx roundtable Discussion Summary .......................................................................... 21 What Is the Role of Regulation in an Emerging Industry? ................................................ 21 Chapter Seven Concluding remarks .......................................................................................... 25 v vi Third-Party Litigation Funding and Claim Transfer: Trends and Implications for the Civil Justice System AppendixeS A. Conference Materials ................................................................................... 27 B. Presenter Materials ...................................................................................... 43 Acknowledgments The RAND Institute for Civil Justice and the UCLA School of Law would like to thank the panelists, speakers, and all those who engaged in the conference discussions. We would particularly like to thank Lynn LoPucki, Selvyn Seidel, Herbert Kritzer, James Tyrrell, Tim Scrantom, Jonathan
Recommended publications
  • Person-Centered and Existential Therapies: a Comparison
    Person-centered and existential therapies: A comparison Lecture in Predeal, Romania, May, 18, 2013 Dr. Gerhard Stumm, Vienna Gerhard Stumm 1 Menu • Existential therapies • Person-centered therapies • Rogers‘ link to existential philosophy and dialogues with existential therapists • Commonalities • Differences • Mutual enrichment Gerhard Stumm 2 Paradigms in psychotherapy psycho- dynamic DA existential CBT BS EH EA PCT integrative humanistic systemic Gerhard Stumm 3 Family tree of existential therapies and its proponents (adapted from Yalom, 1980 and Cooper, 2003a; 2004) Existential philosophy as „Home of the ancestors“ Kierkegaard Heidegger Jaspers Sartre Buber American Humanistic Humanistic European tradition Existential- Psychologists Analysts Humanistic („optimistic („friends of Approach American the family") Existential Daseins- Logotherapy/ Approach British School neighbors“) oriented analysis Existential of Laing of Existential Analysts Analysis Analysis Gebsattel Binswanger Frankl Laing van Deurzen May Maslow Adler Caruso Boss Lukas Spinelli Bugental Ch. Bühler Rank Condrau Längle H. Cohn Yalom Rogers Horney Holzhey- Madison Schneider (Perls) Fromm Kunz (Moreno) Kohut Gerhard Stumm 4 Daseinsanalysis Martin Heidegger Ludwig Binswanger Medard Boss 1889–1976 1881–1966 1903–1990 Gerhard Stumm 5 Daseinsanalysis • against subject-object-split • sensitivity for ontological givens like death, transitoriness, bottomlessness, anxiety, guilt, as fundamental problem • Being-in-the-world means we have to be and master it in our own way call
    [Show full text]
  • ONLINE CONFERENCE "Getting Into the Groove"
    PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE LAWYERS’ ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE AND LIABILITY UPDATE ANNUAL - ONLINE CONFERENCE "Getting into the Groove" November 2020 PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE LAWYERS ASSOCIATION ANNUAL “ONLINE” CONFERENCE – “Getting into the Groove” November 2020 8 mins PNLA Introduction – Katy Manley – President https://www.pnla.org.uk/management-team/ 12 mins Honoured Guest Speaker - The Right Honourable Andrew Mitchell MP https://www.andrew-mitchell-mp.co.uk/ 44 mins Chairman’s Keynote Address – David Halpern QC – 4 New Square Chambers – “Fiduciaries and Good Faith” https://www.4newsquare.com/barristers/david-halpern-qc 34 mins Patrick Lawrence QC – 4 New Square – “Professional Negligence and Liability Update” https://www.4newsquare.com/barristers/patrick-lawrence-qc/ 15 mins Michael Pooles QC – Hailsham Chambers – “Limitation” https://www.hailshamchambers.com/barrister/michael-pooles-qc/ 24 mins William Flenley QC – Hailsham Chambers – “Brokers' Negligence” https://www.hailshamchambers.com/barrister/william-flenley-qc/ 26 mins Luka Krsljanin – 2 Temple Gardens Chambers – “The Future of Disclosure? The Pilot Regime in the Business & Property Courts” http://www.2tg.co.uk/people/luka-krsljanin/ 17 mins Imran Benson – Hailsham Chambers – “The FCA Test Case” https://www.hailshamchambers.com/barrister/imran-benson/ 17 mins Pippa Manby – 4 New Square Chambers – “Negligence: Costs and the demise of the Arkin Cap” https://www.4newsquare.com/barristers/pippa-manby/ 20 mins Matthew Pascall – Barrister – Temple Legal Protection – “ATE –
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Legal Services 2020 Evidence Compendium
    Evidence Compendium THE STATE OF LEGAL SERVICES 2020 CONTENTS 1. Framework and data sources 4 Our approach 5 Data sources 6 2. Environmental context and drivers of change 8 Data from LSB’s Covid-19 dashboard 12 3. Access to legal services for all 14 Summary 15 Snapshot of legal needs 16 Unmet need and barriers to access 19 Legal capability 22 Advice seeking 24 Perceived accessibility of the justice system 26 Paying for legal services 30 Public funding and health of the third sector 33 4. Competition working for consumers 40 Summary 41 Shopping around on price and quality 42 Comparison tools 48 Price competition 49 Levels of innovation and technology adoption 53 Unregulated market 58 The State of Legal Services 2020 § Evidence Compendium § 3 5. Regulation that commands public and professional confidence 62 Summary 63 Quality of legal services 64 Seeking redress 70 Professional conduct 75 Perceptions of legal professionals 82 Regulation: awareness and general public confidence 84 Confidence in the legal system 85 Independence of the legal system 88 6. A diverse and inclusive profession 92 Summary 93 Introduction 94 Availability of data 95 Protected characteristics 96 Socio-economic background 108 Mental health and wellbeing 113 Diversity of judiciary 115 7. A successful and sustainable profession 118 Summary 119 Snapshot of sector 120 Alternative business structures and external investment 123 Economic health of sector 125 The impact of Covid-19 127 Legal aid sector 130 Cost of regulation 132 International standing of jurisdiction 136 8. Endnotes 140 1. FRAMEWORK AND DATA SOURCES The State of Legal Services 2020 § Evidence Compendium § 5 Our approach 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Changed Economy of Legal Knowledge: Response Through a Radical Change to the Legal Trainee Career Path
    The changed economy of legal knowledge: response through a radical change to the legal trainee career path Dr. Nigel Spencer,1 Dr. Katie Best,2 and Des Woods3 Abstract This paper uses a case study to explore how two changes in circumstances within the UK legal services sector led to innovations in career structure, organisational design and the distribution of knowledge within one particular City of London law firm. These two changes were: (1) changes in client demand for more commercial advisers; and (2) the financial crisis or Credit Crunch. The paper sets out the context for the innovation explaining the historic legal education system with its nearly exclusively technical legal curriculum. The authors then set out the need for change in knowledge distribution, based on external market demands, in order to produce more rounded, commercial and business-focused lawyers, and explain how the firm radically revised its career path to create a step-change in commercial knowledge and simultaneously changed the knowledge distribution in the firm. Background: the historic career model and legal services market which required ‘technical experts’ The legal sector’s work historically centred on delivering expert, technical knowledge-in-practice which its legal teams have gradually built up through their careers (Kritzer, 2002). Clients of leading City legal practices continued to value this technical knowledge, especially that of the senior members of the firm (the law firm Partners), and readily bought in the City firms to solve their legal problems, often in a relatively ‘transactional’ relationship whereby the law firm was hired to execute a particular legal instrument within a broader commercial context (Morgan, 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Appellants) V Legal Services Board (Respondent
    Trinity Term [2015] UKSC 41 On appeal from: [2014] EWCA Civ 1276 JUDGMENT R (on the application of Lumsdon and others) (Appellants) v Legal Services Board (Respondent) before Lord Neuberger, President Lady Hale, Deputy President Lord Clarke Lord Reed Lord Toulson JUDGMENT GIVEN ON 24 June 2015 Heard on 16 March 2015 Appellants Respondent Tom de la Mare QC Nigel Giffin QC Mark Trafford QC Martin Chamberlain QC Tom Richards Jana Sadler-Forster (Instructed by Baker & (Instructed by Fieldfisher) McKenzie LLP) Intervener (Bar Standards Board) Timothy Dutton QC Tetyana Nesterchuk (Instructed by Bevan Brittan LLP) Page 2 LORD REED AND LORD TOULSON: (with whom Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale and Lord Clarke agree) 1. The Legal Services Board (“the Board”) was established by the Legal Services Act 2007 (“the 2007 Act”). It exercises supervisory functions in relation to approved regulators of persons carrying on legal activities, including the Bar Standards Board (“BSB”), the Solicitors Regulation Authority (“SRA”) and the ILEX Professional Standards Board (“IPS”). 2. This appeal concerns the lawfulness of the Board’s decision on 26 July 2013 to grant a joint application by the BSB, SRA and IPS for approval of alterations to their regulatory arrangements, under Part 3 of Schedule 4 to the 2007 Act. The alterations gave effect to the Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates (“the scheme”), which provides for the assessment of the performance of criminal advocates in England and Wales by judges. 3. The appellants are barristers practising criminal law. They seek judicial review of the decision on a variety of grounds, all of which were rejected by the Divisional Court and the Court of Appeal: [2014] EWHC 28 (Admin) and [2014] EWCA Civ 1276 respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Barriers to the Legal Profession
    Barriers to the legal profession Rosaline Sullivan July 2010 1 Introduction “Increasingly, children‟s success at school determines their success as adults, determining whether and where they go to college (university), what profession they enter, and how much they are paid” (Buckham and Lee, 2002). The provision of legal services at the highest levels and in the most prestigious firms is dominated by white, male lawyers from the highest socio-economic groups. Our belief is that such an outcome does not occur as a result of overt discrimination but instead barriers to entry and progression occur over the lifetime of individuals seeking a career in law from initial education, to training, to gaining experience within a law firm. This paper explores each stage that an individual follows in pursuing a career in law and the evidence that can help explain the socio-economic characteristics of lawyers we see in England and Wales. Overall purpose of research The Legal Services Board (LSB) has been formed to reform and modernise the regulation of the legal services market place in the interests of consumers. One focus of the LSB‟s first year was on “promoting access to a diverse profession”. In 2010/11 the LSB extends this area of focus to “developing a workforce for a changing market”, enabling us to consider more widely what consumers and procurers of legal services need, want and should be able to expect from the legal workforce. Promoting a legal workforce that is open to the widest pool of talent is recognised across the sector and government as a priority area.
    [Show full text]
  • International Journal of Psychotherapy Gestalt Therapy
    A New Look For The IJP International Journal of PSYCHOTHERAPY Journal of the European Association of Psychotherapy Volume 24 Number 3 November 2020 A ‘Special Issue’ on Gestalt Therapy ISSN: 1356-9082 (Print) ISSN: 1469-8498 (Online) International Journal of PSYCHOTHERAPY Volume 24 Number 3 November 2020 The International Journal of Psychotherapy is a peer-reviewed, scientific journal and is published three times a year in March, July, and November, by the European Association of Psychotherapy (EAP). The EAP is a member of the World Council for Psychotherapy (WCP); and an International NGO member of the Council of Europe. Journal Editor: Courtenay Young, Scotland, UK: [email protected] Administrative Editor: Tom Ormay, Hungary: [email protected] Associate Editor: Alexander Filz, Ukraine: [email protected] Executive Editor: Alicja Heyda, Poland: [email protected] Assistant Editor: Marzena Rusanowska, Poland: [email protected] Editorial Office: [email protected] IJP EDITORIAL BOARD: Godehard Stadmüller, Switzerland Renée Oudijk, The Netherlands Snezana Milenkovic, Serbia Heward Wilkinson, UK Peter Schütz, Austria Barbara FitzGerald, Ireland Milena Karlinska-Nehrebecka, Poland Vesna Petrović, Serbia Anna Colgan, Ireland Ingrid Pirker-Binder, Austria Enver Cesko, Kosovo Susanne Vosmer, UK IJP website: www.ijp.org.uk INTERNATIONAL ADVISORY BOARD (IAB): Mohammad Quasi Abdullah, Syria; A. Roy Bowden, New Zealand; Howard Book, Canada; Paul Boyesen, France; Shaun J. F. Brookhouse, UK; Jacqueline A. Carleton, USA; Loray
    [Show full text]
  • Extreme Conditions Test Counselors Fatigue Dealing with Secondary Traumatization, Vicarious Traumatization, Compassion
    .~ / 105 -Lu Extreme conditions test counselors fatigue Dealing with secondary traumatization, vicarious traumatization, compassion BY MICHAEL DUBI, into neighboring states. Many JANE WEBBER AND had no personal belongings. Written and compiled by J. BARRY MASCARI Many were severely trauma- Scott Barstow, Christopher tized. Campbell and Brian Altman By the time Hurricane Katri- Counselors from all over the na left the Gulf Coast region of United States responded imme- Registration open for Louisiana, Mississippi and diately to provide mental health 2006 Legislative Institute Alabama on Aug. 30, it had and other services to persons Registration is now open for become the most destructive- -affected by-the hurricane. The the American Counseling Asso- and costly natural disaster in American Red Cross and other ciation's 2006 Legislative Insti- U.S. history. By Oct. 1, the offi- groups deployed more than tute to be held Feb. 26-28 in cial death toll stood at 1,242, 1,200 licensed mental health Alexandria, Va. The institute is and property damage was esti- workers to sites throughout the designed to educate and inspire mated to be in excess of $200 Gulf Coast. counselors to become legislativet' billion. According toArnesa A. How- advocates at the state and nation- Homeland Security Secretary ell, writing- for the American Chertoff described al levels. In addition, the event Michael Red Cross, mental health ser- Katrina as "probably the worst have been provided to an excellent opportuni- vices little or no time off. Many other provides or set of catastro- people Disaster response ty to meet the profession's cur- catastrophe more than 340,000 counselors added working with phes" the United States has by Katrina.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 the Future of International Arbitration Agenda Tuesday, 26 March 2019
    HTTPS://LAW.KNECT365.COM/INTERNATIONAL-ARBITRATION/ 2019 THE FUTURE OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION AGENDA TUESDAY, 26 MARCH 2019 08:30 - 09:00 30 mins Badge Collection & Refreshments 09:00 - 09:10 10 mins Chair’s Opening Remarks • Domitille Baizeau - Partner, LALIVE 09:10 - 10:00 50 mins Panel: Defending the Legitimacy of Arbitration • Moderator Domitille Baizeau - Partner, LALIVE • Sherina Petit - Partner, Head of International Arbitration (Asia & EMEA) and Head of India Practice, Norton Rose Fulbright LLP • Paul Key QC - Barrister, Essex Court Chambers • Christopher Boog - Partner, Schellenberg Wittmer • Outlining the threats: what attacks does arbitration face? • Are attacks on State investor arbitration spilling over commercial arbitration? • Understanding the legitimacy of those concerns / defending whilst improving the system • Arbitration vs litigation, the Pendulum swing or the import of litigation tools to arbitration (emergency relief, appellate bodies, summary proceedings, etc?) 10:00 - 11:00 60 mins Panel: Combating or Embracing Codification and ‘Soft Law’? Predictability vs Flexibility • Moderator Lucy Greenwood - Principal, Greenwood Arbitration • Patrizia Netal - Partner, KNOETZL • Nadja Jaisli Kull - Partner, Bär & Karrer AG • James Freeman - Partner, Allen & Overy • Angeline Welsh - Barrister, Matrix Chambers • Whose “Soft Law” should it be? • IBA Rules and Guidelines: too far or not far enough? • Prague Rules on Taking of Evidence: a real alternative? • Reconciling the wants and needs of the parties, counsel and arbitrators
    [Show full text]
  • Emotionally Focused Therapy (EFT) Skills for Working with Couples Learning to Incorporate an EFT Approach and Skills Into Couples Therapy Work
    Emotionally Focused Therapy (EFT) Skills For Working With Couples Learning to incorporate an EFT approach and skills into couples therapy work. Developed by Sue Johnson and Les Greenberg in The method of EFT is progressive, working through 1985, Emotionally-Focused Therapy (EFT) is a a series of steps leading to a change in the couple’s short-term systematic intervention designed to narrative and building strong, secure attachments. reduce distress in adult love relationships while Participants will be taken through these steps and creating more secure attachment bonds. EFT uses will on completion of the workshop be familiar with the power of emotion to evoke new and empathic the key steps in EFT. responses between partners within their key Learning objectives of this training: interactions. These new emotional responses to a 1. Introduction to the theoretical underpinnings of partner’s fears and needs help to create what Sue the EFT method. Johnson calls a new relationship “Dance” where rigidity is replaced by expansiveness and flexibility. 2. Familiarity with and ability to apply the core skills of EFT in existing couples practice. This workshop is designed with one purpose in mind: 3. Comprehension of the steps involved in helping to help participants utilise this approach to transform couples move from a cycle of negative couple relationships to greater emotional security interaction to a more positive and secure style and satisfaction. This training is designed to inform of connection and satisfaction. participants in methods and provide skills to create a 4. Ability to help couples consolidate and enhance safe and collaborative environment, focus on what is their new perceptions and experiences in the most effective, and assist clients to free themselves relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • CS Group Buys AIM for £5.3M Earlier This Month the AIM-Listed Computer Software Group Bought Hull-Based Legal Systems Supplier AIM for £5.3 Million in Cash
    www.legaltechnology.com CS Group buys AIM for £5.3m Earlier this month the AIM-listed Computer Software Group bought Hull-based legal systems supplier AIM for £5.3 million in cash. AIM’s audited accounts to 30 April 2005 show a pre-tax loss from continuing operations of £107k and gross assets of £7.5 million. Since then AIM has disposed of another division and consequently pre-tax losses for the year to 30 April 2006 are expected to increase. However the CS Group says it is confident that “cost savings and synergies resulting from the acquisition CPL expect £850k IT will result in a significant increase in future profitability”. Currently income from recurring support contracts account payback in year one for approximately 51% of AIM’s annual sales. Europe’s largest conveyancing operation Countrywide Property Lawyers is investing Following the acquisition Jim Chase is to continue as £850,000 in an upgrade of their Visualfiles managing director of AIM’s legal software business unit case management and SOS practice within the CS Group. All other AIM Group directors have management software. CPL, who resigned. Commenting on the deal, CS Group chief originally went with a Visualfiles/SOS executive Vin Murria said she was “confident AIM, with its solution in 1997 but then flirted with and strong and stable client base, will steadily grow in sales subsequently abandoned a bespoke and profits. It will provide a sound base from which CS project called Fusion, say they are Group can develop a significant position in the legal confident the upgrade will pay for itself sector, in which we intend to become a leading supplier.” within the first year of implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • Bar Directory
    BAR DIRECTORY LONDON The Chambers of William Clegg QC ATKINS CHAMBERS Specialists in all aspects of Criminal Law including Atkins Chambers all serious and complex criminal offences, 1 Atkin Building Confi scation proceedings, Extradition, Financial services, Gray’s Inn Fraud, Health and Safety, Inside Dealing, London International Criminal Law, Market Abuse, WC1R 5AT Medico-Legal, Money Laundering, T: 020 7404 0102 F: 020 7405 7456 Professional Disciplinary Tribunals, E: [email protected] Public Enquiries, Regulatory, Sports Law, DX: 1033 Lond/Chancery Ln Trading Standards and Tribunals. W: www.atkinchambers.com M: 07799 844018 (out-of-hours) Advice and representation provided from investigation Atkin Chambers is a leading set of chambers specialising in various aspects of to appellate advocacy. commercial law. It is particularly well known for its advocacy and advice on cases concerning domestic and international construction and engineering contracts and projects. However, along with this wide area of practice it has developed extensive Mr William Clegg QC Mr Timothy Kendal expertise and experience in areas such as information technology, insurance, oil and Mr Howard Godfrey QC Mr Richard Matthews gas, professional negligence, dry shipping and general commercial law. Th e quality Lord Morris of Aberavon Mr Craig Rush and strength of chambers across a number of fi elds and the international character KG, QC Mr James Ageros of its work have recently been recognised by it becoming the fi rst chambers in the Mr Peter Griffi ths QC Mr Sean Hammond United Kingdom to be granted a Queen’s Award for Enterprise in the international Mr Andrew Munday QC Miss Valerie Charbit trade category.
    [Show full text]