DOCSLIB.ORG

Studie Zur Vergütung Der Vorstände in Den DAX- Und MDAX-Unternehmen Im Geschäftsjahr 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Studie Zur Vergütung Der Vorstände in Den DAX- Und MDAX-Unternehmen Im Geschäftsjahr 2016 Studie zur Vergütung der Vorstände in den DAX- und MDAX-Unternehmen im Geschäftsjahr 2016 © Deutsche Schutzvereinigung für Wertpapierbesitz e.V. (DSW) / Technische Universität München (TUM) Billigung des Vergütungssystems – Analyse der Zustimmungsquoten im DAX Gesellschaft Zustimmung 2010 Zustimmung 2011 Zustimmung 2012 Zustimmung 2013 Zustimmung 2014 Zustimmung 2015 Zustimmung 2016 Zustimmung 2017 Adidas 89,96 --- 89,50 --- --- 77,47 --- --- Allianz 86,20 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- BASF 98,36 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Bayer 95,25 --- --- --- --- --- 81,10 --- Beiersdorf 99,07 97,87 99,22 94,75 --- --- --- 77,29 BMW 97,66 95,83 95,45 --- 96,56 --- --- --- Commerzbank 96,97 --- --- --- --- 98,36 --- --- Continental 97,09 --- --- --- 98,23 --- --- 80,91 Daimler 95,97 97,38 --- --- 96,82 --- --- --- Deutsche Bank 58,06 --- 94,25 88,71 --- --- 48,07 96,79 Deutsche Börse 52,77 --- --- --- --- --- 84,19 --- Deutsche Lufthansa 97,30 98,41 --- --- --- --- 89,95 --- Deutsche Post 98,27 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Deutsche Telekom 95,91 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- E.ON 95,88 96,00 --- 90,65 --- --- 91,14 --- Fresenius 99,51 --- 97,00 96,39 --- --- --- --- Fresenius Medical Care 99,26 99,71 --- --- --- --- 76,03 --- Heidelberg Cement 45,82 96,04 --- --- 97,59 --- --- --- Henkel 99,93 --- --- --- --- 99,46 --- --- Infineon --- 93,25 --- 76,98 --- --- --- --- Linde 98,56 --- 96,45 --- --- --- --- --- Merck --- 70,30 86,73 --- --- --- --- 46,04 Munich RE 98,33 89,79 89,81 95,41 92,43 90,19 84,75 34,29 ProSiebenSat1 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 33,19 RWE 96,14 --- --- 74,03 96,10 --- --- 81,25 SAP 97,54 --- 65,85 --- --- --- 54,69 --- Siemens 89,65 96,70 --- --- 93,89 92,79 --- --- ThyssenKrupp 99,55 94,91 --- --- --- 98,79 --- --- Volkswagen 99,44 --- --- --- --- --- --- 80,96 Vonovia --- --- --- --- 99,05 --- --- --- Ø DAX 91,48 93,85 90,47 88,13 96,33 92,84 76,24 66,34 © Deutsche Schutzvereinigung für Wertpapierbesitz e.V. (DSW) / Technische Universität München (TUM) Struktur und Entwicklung der durchschnittlichen Vorstandsvergütung (inkl. Vorsitzende) im DAX nach Vergütungskomponenten 2015 - 2016 in TEURO Ø -Fixvergütung pro Ø -variable Barvergütung Ø -Barvergütung pro Ø -aktienkursbasierte Ø -Gesamtvergütung pro Vorstand inkl. Vorsitzende Veränderung pro Vorstand inkl. Veränderung Vorstand inkl. Vorsitzende Veränderung Vergütung pro Vorstand Veränderung Vorstand inkl. Vorsitzende Veränderung Gesellschaft [T€] in % Vorsitzende [T€] in % [T€] in % inkl. Vorsitzende [T€] in % (ohne Pensionen) [T€] in % 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 Adidas 14,67% 45,9% 35,2% k.A. 35,2% Allianz -0,83% 1,8% 1,1% 1,8% 1,3% BASF -4,89% 0,5% -1,7% -2,4% -1,8% BMW 2,07% 7,0% 5,9% 14,9% 6,1% Bayer 3,10% 3,3% 3,2% 36,9% 15,5% Beiersdorf -3,47% -4,1% -3,9% k.A. -3,9% Commerzbank 2,52% 0,3% 1,7% 0,3% 1,3% Continental 0,61% -15,6% -9,4% -0,1% -8,0% Daimler 9,90% -23,3% -9,3% -16,9% -12,1% Deutsche Bank -9,01% k.A. -9,0% k.A. -9,0% Deutsche Börse 9,20% 0,8% 4,3% 75,5% 24,4% Deutsche Lufthansa 6,38% 27,0% 13,9% -4,1% 9,9% Deutsche Post 3,34% 63,2% 24,0% 3,2% 16,0% Deutsche Telekom 3,39% 0,4% 1,5% -0,7% 1,3% E.ON 10,36% 28,3% 19,1% 2,8% 13,1% Fresenius -3,47% 8,2% 3,6% -10,9% -3,1% Fresenius Medical Care -19,32% 95,8% 25,7% -26,9% -2,4% Heidelberg Cement 1,78% -17,5% -11,2% 22,2% -4,6% Henkel 0,75% -0,5% -0,2% -4,1% -1,0% Infineon -1,79% -14,8% -8,9% -29,4% -10,6% Linde 1,47% -0,2% 0,6% 4,8% 2,4% Merck -5,11% -28,7% -23,2% 1,1% -17,7% Munich RE 8,21% 2,4% 4,7% -0,3% 3,5% ProSiebenSat1 -3,99% 36,6% 16,9% -11,8% 4,3% RWE -4,66% -16,4% -11,3% 78,6% 3,2% SAP 6,88% 35,2% 21,1% 5132,8% 163,4% Siemens 9,21% -1,6% 3,1% 10,8% 5,3% ThyssenKrupp 4,31% -12,3% -2,7% -26,3% -13,3% Volksw agen -2,39% -60,5% -47,4% 52,5% -32,9% Vonovia 4,94% -33,1% -14,2% 0,2% -8,2% Median DAX 945 955 1,1% 1.199 1.236 3,1% 2.203 2.205 0,1% 842 984 16,8% 2.909 3.094 6,4% Ø DAX 1.029 1.050 2,0% 1.534 1.412 -8,0% 2.564 2.461 -4,0% 777 914 17,6% 3.341 3.376 1,0% © Deutsche Schutzvereinigung für Wertpapierbesitz e.V. (DSW) / Technische Universität München (TUM) Durchschnittliche Gesamtvergütung in 2016 (inkl. Vorstandsvorsitzende) im DAX im Vergleich zu den durchschnittlichen Personalaufwendungen pro Mitarbeiter Veränderung Ø Gesamtvergütung Ø Personalaufwand Gesellschaft Vertikalität Vertikalität [T€] pro M A [T€] zum Vorjahr Fresenius 3.433 42 83 ↑ Deutsche Post 3.199 39 82 ↑ Heidelberg Cement 3.561 44 80 ↑ Adidas 3.241 42 78 ↑ Volksw agen 4.677 61 77 ↓ Henkel 4.256 58 73 ↑ Continental 2.833 44 64 ↓ Merck 5.157 86 60 ↓ Fresenius Medical Care 3.377 59 58 ↓ Siemens 4.129 80 51 ↑ BMW 4.705 92 51 ↑ Daimler 3.729 75 50 ↓ SAP 5.771 122 47 ↑ Vonovia 2.203 48 46 ↑ ThyssenKrupp 2.646 57 46 ↓ Allianz 3.783 84 45 ↑ E.ON 2.928 66 44 ↑ Linde 2.568 63 41 → Bayer 3.881 99 39 ↑ Deutsche Lufthansa 2.266 59 38 ↑ Deutsche Telekom 2.791 75 37 ↓ RWE 2.800 81 34 → Infineon 1.904 56 34 ↓ Beiersdorf 2.211 66 33 ↓ BASF 2.990 89 33 ↓ Deutsche Börse 3.556 113 31 ↑ Munich RE 2.562 83 31 ↑ ProSiebenSat1 2.723 94 29 ↑ Commerzbank 2.045 75 27 → Deutsche Bank 2.691 119 23 ↑ Ø DAX 3.376 67 50 → © Deutsche Schutzvereinigung für Wertpapierbesitz e.V. (DSW) / Technische Universität München (TUM) Gesamtvergütung der Vorstandsvorsitzenden im DAX in 2016 in TEURO Rang Vorstandsvorsitzender Gesellschaft Fixe Barvergütung [T€] Variable Barvergütung [T€] Aktienkursbasierte Vergütung [T€] Gesamtvergütung [T€] 1 Bill McDermott SAP 3.029 2.744 8.000 13.773 2 Matthias Müller Volkswagen 1.763 4.782 3.070 9.615 3 Dr. Dieter Zetsche Daimler 2.626 2.520 2.570 7.716 4 Harald Krüger BMW 1.519 5.947 162 7.628 5 Dr. Bernd Scheifele Heidelberg Cement 1.637 3.781 1.826 7.244 6 Joe Kaeser Siemens 2.136 2.773 2.158 7.067 7 Carsten Kengeter Deutsche Börse 1.629 2.200 2.400 6.229 8 Rice Powell Fresenius Medical Care 1.363 2.403 2.415 6.181 9 Dr. Stefan Oschmann* Merck 1.291 3.278 1.549 6.118 10 Stefan Heidenreich Beiersdorf 1.259 4.563 0 5.822 11 Dr. Frank Appel Deutsche Post 1.998 1.736 1.963 5.696 12 Werner Baumann* Bayer 1.332 2.329 1.983 5.644 13 Oliver Bäte Allianz 1.155 2.948 1.474 5.577 14 Hans van Bylen* Henkel 1.170 3.113 1.047 5.329 15 Timotheus Höttges Deutsche Telekom 1.607 3.103 384 5.093 16 Stephan Sturm* Fresenius 893 1.773 2.163 4.829 17 Dr. Kurt Bock BASF 1.368 2.600 844 4.812 18 Dr. Johannes Teyssen E.ON 1.282 1.638 1.828 4.748 19 Dr. Elmar Degenhart Continental 1.452 2.445 740 4.637 20 Dr. Heinrich Hiesinger ThyssenKrupp 1.644 980 1.656 4.280 21 Dr. Nikolaus von Bomhard Munich RE 1.296 1.973 944 4.212 22 Thomas Ebeling ProSiebenSat1 1.097 1.990 1.000 4.087 23 John Cryan Deutsche Bank 3.842 0 0 3.842 24 Carsten Spohr Deutsche Lufthansa 1.497 1.009 685 3.191 25 Rolf Buch Vonovia 1.039 695 1.429 3.163 26 Dr. Rolf Martin Schmitz* RWE 979 1.112 769 2.860 27 Martin Zielke* Commerzbank 1.243 710 710 2.663 28 Kasper Rorsted* Adidas 852 1.771 0 2.623 29 Dr. Reinhard Ploss Infineon 1.111 955 244 2.310 30 Prof. Dr.-Ing. Aldo Belloni* Linde 78 71 48 196 Median DAX 1.366 2.366 1.238 5.211 Ø DAX 1.587 2.386 1.547 5.519 * Nicht das volle Geschäftsjahr Vorstandsvorsitzender des jeweiligen Unternehmens: Dr. Oschmann (Merck) seit 29.4.16, Herr Baumann (Bayer), Herr Zielke (Commerzbank) und Herr van Bylen (Henkel) jeweils seit 1.5.16, Herr Sturm (Fresenius) seit 1.7.16, Herr Rorsted (Adidas) seit 1.10.16, Dr. Schmitz (RWE) seit 15.10.16 und Prof. Dr.-Ing. Belloni (Linde) seit 8.12.16. © Deutsche Schutzvereinigung für Wertpapierbesitz e.V. (DSW) / Technische Universität München (TUM) Gesamtvergütung der Finanzvorstände im DAX in 2016 in TEURO Rang Finanzvorstand Gesellschaft Fixe Barvergütung [T€] Variable Barvergütung [T€] Aktienkursbasierte Vergütung [T€] Gesamtvergütung [T€] 1 Luka Mucic SAP 712 1.661 2.477 4.849 2 Stephan Sturm Fresenius 893 1.773 2.163 4.829 3 Dr. Friedrich Eichiner BMW 925 3.469 101 4.496 4 Frank Witter Volkswagen 1.106 1.483 1.443 4.031 5 Carsten Knobel Henkel 804 2.364 768 3.935 6 Marcus Kuhnert Merck 820 1.956 1.022 3.798 7 Dr. Dieter Wemmer Allianz 765 1.908 954 3.627 8 Dr. Ralf P. Thomas Siemens 1.104 1.370 1.099 3.573 9 Michael Brosnan Fresenius Medical Care 890 1.300 1.306 3.496 10 Bodo Uebber Daimler 1.091 1.165 1.229 3.485 11 Johannes Dietsch Bayer 833 978 1.522 3.333 12 Dr.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Retirement Strategy Fund 2060 Description Plan 3S DCP & JRA
    Retirement Strategy Fund 2060 June 30, 2020 Note: Numbers may not always add up due to rounding. % Invested For Each Plan Description Plan 3s DCP & JRA ACTIVIA PROPERTIES INC REIT 0.0137% 0.0137% AEON REIT INVESTMENT CORP REIT 0.0195% 0.0195% ALEXANDER + BALDWIN INC REIT 0.0118% 0.0118% ALEXANDRIA REAL ESTATE EQUIT REIT USD.01 0.0585% 0.0585% ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GOVT STIF SSC FUND 64BA AGIS 587 0.0329% 0.0329% ALLIED PROPERTIES REAL ESTAT REIT 0.0219% 0.0219% AMERICAN CAMPUS COMMUNITIES REIT USD.01 0.0277% 0.0277% AMERICAN HOMES 4 RENT A REIT USD.01 0.0396% 0.0396% AMERICOLD REALTY TRUST REIT USD.01 0.0427% 0.0427% ARMADA HOFFLER PROPERTIES IN REIT USD.01 0.0124% 0.0124% AROUNDTOWN SA COMMON STOCK EUR.01 0.0248% 0.0248% ASSURA PLC REIT GBP.1 0.0319% 0.0319% AUSTRALIAN DOLLAR 0.0061% 0.0061% AZRIELI GROUP LTD COMMON STOCK ILS.1 0.0101% 0.0101% BLUEROCK RESIDENTIAL GROWTH REIT USD.01 0.0102% 0.0102% BOSTON PROPERTIES INC REIT USD.01 0.0580% 0.0580% BRAZILIAN REAL 0.0000% 0.0000% BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUP INC REIT USD.01 0.0418% 0.0418% CA IMMOBILIEN ANLAGEN AG COMMON STOCK 0.0191% 0.0191% CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST REIT USD.01 0.0394% 0.0394% CANADIAN DOLLAR 0.0005% 0.0005% CAPITALAND COMMERCIAL TRUST REIT 0.0228% 0.0228% CIFI HOLDINGS GROUP CO LTD COMMON STOCK HKD.1 0.0105% 0.0105% CITY DEVELOPMENTS LTD COMMON STOCK 0.0129% 0.0129% CK ASSET HOLDINGS LTD COMMON STOCK HKD1.0 0.0378% 0.0378% COMFORIA RESIDENTIAL REIT IN REIT 0.0328% 0.0328% COUSINS PROPERTIES INC REIT USD1.0 0.0403% 0.0403% CUBESMART REIT USD.01 0.0359% 0.0359% DAIWA OFFICE INVESTMENT
    [Show full text]
  • MDAX—2019 Supervisory Board Study Key Insights from This Year’S Analysis by Russell Reynolds Associates
    MDAX—2019 Supervisory Board Study Key insights from this year’s analysis by Russell Reynolds Associates Summary Over the past year, Germany's MDAX companies have experienced significant change. The number of companies in the index increased by 10, bringing the overall total to 60. Moreover, 11 "old economy" firms, including Jungheinrich, Krones, Leoni, Salzgitter and Schaeffler, were ousted by pharma, med and biotech risers, such as Evotec, Morphosys, Qiagen, Sartorius and Siemens Healthineers, as well as "new economy" powerhouses like Dialog, Nemetschek, Software AG, Telefonica D, and United Internet. This was also an exceptional election year, with 106 shareholder representative positions expiring. All positions were filled. A total of 67 board members were re-elected, while 36 were replaced. The three remaining roles were absorbed by changes to board sizes. Female shareholder representation surpasses 30 percent For the first time, the share of female shareholder representatives surpassed the required quota, reaching 30.6 percent. Including employee representatives, women now make up 32 percent of supervisory board members. A total of three boards are now chaired by women. However, there is still a major gender discrepancy concerning positions of power when comparing chairpersonships and especially executive board positions. Only four companies can boast more than 30 percent of female executives, while 40 MDAX companies do not have a single woman in a leadership role. Accelerated increase in digital directors The number of digital directors on MDAX supervisory boards showed a significant 30 percent year- on-year increase. However, digital expertise is still unevenly spread in the MDAX. Seven companies have three or more digital directors, while 57 percent of boards completely lack digital expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • DIW Weekly Report 3/2019 DOI: Women Executives Barometer: Companies
    9 1 DIW Weekly Report 3 20 AT A GLANCE Increasing number of women on supervisory boards of major companies in Germany; executive boards still dominated by men By Elke Holst and Katharina Wrohlich • Proportion of women on supervisory boards of large German companies has increased since 2018; growth on executive boards much lower in many places • Gender quota for supervisory boards is making an impact: on average, quota-subject companies have boards with almost 33 percent female members • However, first signs that companies are not doing more than the minimum and efforts stop after 30 percent mark is reached • Quota has no short-term effect on executive boards • If companies want to avoid a quota for executive boards, they must consistently appoint more women to all hierarchical levels, including those below the board Gender quota for supervisory boards is having an impact but not on the executive board short-term Proportion of women in the top 200 companies in percent 35 30 Supervisory board 25 With binding gender quota 20 Without binding gender quota 15 10 5 Executive board With binding gender quota 0 for supervisory boards 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Without binding gender quota Source: Authors’ own surveys and calculations. ©DIW Berlin 2019 FROM THE AUTHORS MEDIA “It cannot be assumed, at least in the short term, that more women on the supervisory board will lead to more women on the executive board. The proportion of female board members is even lower in the companies subject to the quota than in other companies.” Audio Interview
    [Show full text]
  • HDI Global SE Geschäftsbericht 2019 Konzernstruktur Group Structure
    400-GB205 HDI Global SE HDI-Platz 1 30659 Hannover Telefon +49 511 645-0 Telefax +49 511 645-4545 www.hdi.global www.talanx.com HDI Global SE Geschäftsbericht 2019 Konzernstruktur Group structure Talanx AG HDI GlobalGlobal SE SE auf auf einen einen Blick Blick Geschäftsbereich Geschäftsbereich Privat- Geschäftsbereich Privat- Geschäftsbereich Konzernfunktionen Industrieversicherung und Firmenversicherung und Firmenversicherung Rückversicherung Corporate Operations Industrial Lines Division Deutschland International Reinsurance Division 2019 2018 Retail Germany Division Retail International Lebens- Division Schaden- Personen- Beitragseinnahme (brutto) Mio. EUR 4.449 4.616 Schaden/ Unfallver- versicherung Rück- Rück- Beitragsentwicklung (brutto) % -3,6 4,9 sicherung Life Insurance versicherung versicherung Property/ Life/ Verdiente Beitragseinnahme f.e.R. Mio. EUR 2.110 2.223 Property/ Casualty Casualty Health Aufwendungen für Versicherungsfälle f.e.R. Mio. EUR 1.694 1.999 Insurance Reinsurance Reinsurance 1) Schadenquote f.e.R. % 80,3 89,9 Ampega Asset Aufwendungen für den Versicherungsbetrieb f.e.R. Mio. EUR 518 528 HDI Global SE HDI Deutschland AG HDI International AG Hannover Rück SE Management GmbH 2) Kostenquote f.e.R. % 24,6 23,7 Versicherungstechnisches Ergebnis vor Schwankungsrückstellungen f.e.R. Mio. EUR -103 -302 HDI HDI Seguros S.A. 3) HDI Global Specialty SE E+S Rück versicherung AG Ampega Investment GmbH Kombinierte Schaden-/Kostenquote f.e.R. % 104,9 113,7 Versicherung AG (Argentina) Kapitalanlagen Mio. EUR 7.653 7.121 HDI Versicherung AG HDI Seguros S.A. Hannover ReTakaful B.S.C. (c) Lifestyle Protection AG Ampega Real Estate GmbH Kapitalerträge Mio. EUR 263 358 (Austria) (Brazil) (Bahrain) 4) Ergebnis des allgemeinen Geschäfts Mio.
    [Show full text]
  • Standardized Software
    // when transparency matters. Standardized Software for Service and Infrastructure Management 2 | Contents 4 | 5 The Challenge 6 | 7 Asset & Configuration Management 8 | 9 IT Infrastructure Management 10 | 11 Data Center Infrastructure Management 12 | 13 Telecommunication Resource Inventory 14 | 15 Cable Management 16 | 17 FNT Command Module and Value Packs 18 | 19 References and About Us | 3 // Get the Overview IT and telecommunications are the lifeblood of modern ties and technologies are installed and where – down to the enterprises. Developing and upgrading them is therefore level of individual workstations at a distant subsidiary. And vital for maintaining a competitive edge. However, obtain­ depending on the task, various infrastructure views are need­ ing maximum benefit and efficiency from your IT and tele­ ed, from the virtualization layer to the physical component, communications infrastructure requires full insight into your from the actual state to the planned upgrade. resources and options. Ultimately, modern infrastructure management requires a The challenges are enormous. IT and telecommunications comprehensive, dynamic system. All the information in one infrastructures are continuously changing. To roll out and place, consistent, up­to­date, available at the push of a operate IT services reliably, you need to know which capaci­ button. If you want that too, read on. 4 | Business Processes Connectivity Connectivity Data Centers Information Technology Telecommunication Business Services Monitoring Services Applications Integrated Virtualization FNT Data Model Logical Layer Physical Layer Auto-Discovery/ Buildings & Facilities Application Discovery Holistic Management System for Services, Configuration & Infrastructure Connectivity Connectivity Network Client IT Portfolio IP PBX ERP LDAP ... Management Management Management // We Provide You with Transparency FNT Command is a modular, standardized software product State-of-the-Art Software Architecture for infrastructure management.
    [Show full text]
  • Online-Appendix Zu
    Online-Appendix zu „Impact of Weather on the Stock Market Returns of Different Industries in Germany“ Astrid Schulte-Huermann WHU – Otto Beisheim School of Management Junior Management Science 5(3) (2020) 295-311 Appendix Appendix A. List of companies included in each sector Financials Telecommunication Technology Consumer Non- Industrials Healthcare Basic Materials Consumer Cyclicals Utilities Cyclicals ALLIANZ SE DT TELEKOM N INFINEON TECH BEIERSDORF DEUTSCHE POST BAYER N AG BASF SE ADIDAS N RWE DEUTSCHE BANK 1&1 DRILLISCH SAP SE BAYWA N DT LUFTHANSA A FRESENIUS MEDI HEIDELBERGCEMEBAY MOT WERKE ENCAVIS DT BOERSE N FREENET N AG BECHTLE KWS SAAT SIEMENS N FRESENIUS SE HENKEL AG&CO V CONTINENTAL AG E ON MUENCH. RUECK UNITED INTERNE DIALOG SEMICON SUEDZUCKER WIRE CARD MERCK KGAA LINDE PLC DAIMLER AG N AAREAL BANK NEMETSCHEK AIRBUS SE CARL ZEISS MED THYSSENKRUPP A VOLKSWAGEN VZ ALSTRIA OFF RE SOFTWARE DUERR AG EVOTEC AURUBIS A SPRINGER SE COMMERZBANK ADVA OPTICAL N FRAPORT GERRESHEIMER FUCHS PETRO VZ FIELMANN DEUTSCHE WOHNE AIXTRON NA GEA GROUP MORPHOSYS K+S AG NA HUGO BOSS N DT EUROSHOP NA CANCOM SE HOCHTIEF QIAGEN NV LANXESS PROSIEBENSAT1 HANNOVER RUECK COMPUGROUP MED MTU AERO ENGIN SARTORIUS VZ SYMRISE AG PUMA TAG IMMOBILIEN ISRA VISION AMADEUS FIRE DRAEGERWERK VZ WACKER CHEMIE RHEINMETALL ADLER REAL ES S&T AG BERTRANDT RHOEN KLINIKUM KLOECKNER + CO RTL GROUP DIC ASSET SMA SOLAR TECH BILFINGER SALZGITTER BOR. DORTMUND DT BETEIL AG TAKKT CEWE STIFTUNG SGL CARBON CECONOMY GRENKE XING DEUTZ CTS EVENTIM HAMBORNER REIT ZOOPLUS DR HOENLE HORNBACH HYPOPORT AG HAMBURGER HAFE RATIONAL PATRIZIA IMMOB HEIDELBERG DRU SAF HOLLAND SA WUESTENR&WUERT INDUS HOLDING STEINHOFF JENOPTIK JUNGHEINRICH V KOENIG & BAUER KRONES AG LEONI AG N NORDEX PFEIFFER VACUU SIXT SE VOSSLOH AG WACKER NEUSON WASHTEC Company data retrieved from Thomson Reuters Datastream, 2019 40 Appendix B.
    [Show full text]
  • Standardized Software
    // when transparency matters. Standardized Software for Service and Infrastructure Management 2 | Contents 4 | 5 The Challenge 6 | 7 Asset & Configuration Management 8 | 9 IT Infrastructure Management 10 | 11 Data Center Infrastructure Management 12 | 13 Telecommunication Resource Inventory 14 | 15 Cable Management 16 | 17 FNT Command Modules and Services 18 | 19 References | 3 // Get the Overview IT and telecommunications are the lifeblood of modern and technologies are installed and where – down to the level of enterprises. Developing and upgrading them is therefore individual workstations at a distant subsidiary. And depending vital for maintaining a competitive edge. However, obtaining on the task, various infrastructure views are needed, from maximum benefit and efficiency from your IT and tele­ the virtualization layer to the physical component, from the communications infrastructure requires full insight into your actual state to the planned upgrade. resources and options. Ultimately, modern infrastructure management requires an The challenges are enormous. IT and telecommunications integrated, dynamic system. All the information in one place, infrastructures are continuously changing. To roll out and consistent, up­to­date, available at the push of a button. If operate IT services reliably, you need to know which capacities you want that too, read on. 4 | Business Processes Connectivity Connectivity Data Centers Information Technology Telecommunication Business Services Monitoring Services Applications Integrated Virtualization FNT Data Model Logical Layer Physical Layer Auto-Discovery/ Buildings & Facilities Application Discovery Holistic Management System for Services, Configuration & Infrastructure Connectivity Connectivity Network Client IT Portfolio IP PBX ERP LDAP ... Management Management Management // We Provide You with Transparency FNT Command is a modular, standardized software product State-of-the-Art Software Architecture for infrastructure management.
    [Show full text]
  • HDI Global SE Geschäftsbericht 2015 HDI Global SE Geschäftsbericht 2015 Konzernstruktur Group Structure
    400-GB135 HDI Global SE HDI-Platz 1 30659 Hannover Telefon +49 511 645-0 Telefax +49 511 645-4545 www.hdi.global www.talanx.com HDI Global SE Geschäftsbericht 2015 HDI Global SE Geschäftsbericht 2015 Konzernstruktur Group structure HDI Global SE auf einen Blick Talanx AG Geschäftsbereich Geschäftsbereich Privat- Geschäftsbereich Privat- Geschäftsbereich Konzernfunktionen 2015 2014 Industrieversicherung und Firmenversicherung und Firmenversicherung Rückversicherung Corporate Operations Reinsurance Division Beitragseinnahme (brutto) Mio. EUR 3.980 3.787 Industrial Lines Division Deutschland International Retail Germany Division Retail International Beitragsentwicklung (brutto) % 5,1 15,8 Schaden- Personen- Division Rück- Rück- Verdiente Beitragseinnahme f.e.R. Mio. EUR 1.785 1.602 versicherung versicherung Aufwendungen für Versicherungsfälle f.e.R. Mio. EUR 1.411 1.335 Non-Life Life and Reinsurance Health Schadenquote f.e.R. % 79,1 83,3 Reinsurance Aufwendungen für den Versicherungsbetrieb f.e.R. Mio. EUR 455 395 1) Talanx Asset Kostenquote f.e.R. % 25,5 24,7 HDI Global SE Talanx Deutschland AG Talanx International AG Hannover Rück SE Management GmbH Versicherungstechnisches Ergebnis vor Schwankungsrückstellung f.e.R. Mio. EUR -84 -124 Kombinierte Schaden-/Kostenquote f.e.R. % 104,6 108,0 HDI Versicherung AG HDI HDI Seguros S.A. Hannover ReTakaful B.S.C. (c) Ampega Investment GmbH Kapitalanlagen Mio. EUR 6.600 6.562 (Austria) Versicherung AG (Argentina) (Bahrain) Kapitalerträge Mio. EUR 256 350 HDI-Gerling Seguros HDI HDI Seguros S.A. Hannover Re Talanx Immobilien Industriais S.A. Ergebnis des allgemeinen Geschäfts* Mio. EUR 151 226 Lebensversicherung AG (Brazil) (Bermuda) Ltd. Management GmbH (Brazil) Ergebnis der normalen Geschäftstätigkeit Mio.
    [Show full text]
  • HDI Global SE Geschäftsbericht 2018 HDI Global SE Geschäftsbericht 2018 Konzernstruktur Group Structure
    xxx 400-GB HDI Global SE HDI-Platz 1 30659 Hannover Telefon +49 511 645-0 Telefax +49 511 645-4545 www.hdi.global www.talanx.com HDI Global SE Geschäftsbericht 2018 HDI Global SE Geschäftsbericht 2018 Konzernstruktur Group structure Talanx AG HDI Global SE auf einen Blick Geschäftsbereich Geschäftsbereich Privat- Geschäftsbereich Privat- Geschäftsbereich Konzernfunktionen Industrieversicherung und Firmenversicherung und Firmenversicherung Rückversicherung Corporate Operations Industrial Lines Division Deutschland International Reinsurance Division 2018 2017 Retail Germany Division Retail International Division Schaden- Personen- Beitragseinnahme (brutto) Mio. EUR 4.616 4.401 Schaden/ Lebens- Unfallver- versicherung Rück- Rück- Beitragsentwicklung (brutto) % 4,9 10,1 sicherung Life Insurance versicherung versicherung Verdiente Beitragseinnahme f. e. R. Mio. EUR 2.223 2.157 Property/ Property/ Life/ Casualty Casualty Health Aufwendungen für Versicherungsfälle f. e. R. Mio. EUR 1.999 1.901 Insurance Reinsurance Reinsurance Schadenquote f. e. R.1) % 89,9 88,2 Ampega Asset Aufwendungen für den Versicherungsbetrieb f. e. R. Mio. EUR 528 527 HDI Global SE HDI Deutschland AG HDI International AG Hannover Rück SE Management GmbH Kostenquote f. e. R.2) % 23,7 24,4 Versicherungstechnisches Ergebnis vor Schwankungsrückstellung f. e. R. Mio. EUR –302 –279 HDI HDI Seguros S.A. HDI Global Specialty SE E+S Rück versicherung AG Ampega Investment GmbH Kombinierte Schaden-/Kostenquote f. e. R.3) % 113,7 112,6 Versicherung AG (Argentina) Kapitalanlagen Mio. EUR 7.121 6.637 HDI Versicherung AG HDI Seguros S.A. Hannover ReTakaful B.S.C. (c) Lifestyle Protection AG Ampega Real Estate GmbH Kapitalerträge Mio. EUR 358 299 (Austria) (Brazil) (Bahrain) Ergebnis des allgemeinen Geschäfts4) Mio.
    [Show full text]
  • Authorizations for Capital Raisings and Convertible Bond Issues 2015
    Authorizations for Capital Raisings and Convertible Bond Issues DAX® and German MDAX® Companies (Based on 2015 Annual Meetings) © 2016 Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP. All rights reserved. Preface This booklet presents a summary overview of authorizations for capital raisings and convertible bond issuances of all DAX® and German MDAX® companies based on their 2015 annual general meetings. The amount of any authorized capital reflected in this booklet takes into account any issuance of shares out of authorized capital entered into the commercial register prior to December 2015. The amount of any convertible bond authorization and underlying conditional capital reflected in this booklet takes into account the issuance of any convertible bonds based on such authorization prior to December 2015 and the amount of conditional capital underlying such convertible bonds as more fully described in this booklet. All information regarding the free float of the selected companies as of the last index rebalancing date in December 2015 was taken from a website of Deutsche Börse AG (www.dax-indices.com) where such information can be found under “Downloads” → “Composition & Indicators” → “Composition DAX” and “Composition MDAX”. Deutsche Börse AG regularly calculates the free float for index weighting purposes according to the definition set out in Section 2.3 of the “Guide to the Equity Indices of Deutsche Börse” which is also available under www.dax-indices.com (“Downloads” → “Guides & Factsheets”). Inclusion in the DAX® and MDAX® requires, among other things, a minimum free float of 10%. We hope you will find this booklet useful. We will be pleased to answer any queries you may have in connection with the information presented in this booklet.
    [Show full text]
  • M Funds Quarterly Holdings 3.31.2020*
    M International Equity Fund 31-Mar-20 CUSIP SECURITY NAME SHARES MARKET VALUE % OF TOTAL ASSETS 233203421 DFA Emerging Markets Core Equity P 2,263,150 35,237,238.84 24.59% 712387901 Nestle SA, Registered 22,264 2,294,710.93 1.60% 711038901 Roche Holding AG 4,932 1,603,462.36 1.12% 690064001 Toyota Motor Corp. 22,300 1,342,499.45 0.94% 710306903 Novartis AG, Registered 13,215 1,092,154.20 0.76% 079805909 BP Plc 202,870 863,043.67 0.60% 780087953 Royal Bank of Canada 12,100 749,489.80 0.52% ACI07GG13 Novo Nordisk A/S, Class B 12,082 728,803.67 0.51% B15C55900 Total SA 18,666 723,857.50 0.51% 098952906 AstraZeneca Plc 7,627 681,305.26 0.48% 406141903 LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton S 1,684 625,092.87 0.44% 682150008 Sony Corp. 10,500 624,153.63 0.44% B03MLX903 Royal Dutch Shell Plc, Class A 35,072 613,753.12 0.43% 618549901 CSL, Ltd. 3,152 571,782.15 0.40% ACI02GTQ9 ASML Holding NV 2,066 549,061.02 0.38% B4TX8S909 AIA Group, Ltd. 60,200 541,577.35 0.38% 677062903 SoftBank Group Corp. 15,400 539,261.93 0.38% 621503002 Commonwealth Bank of Australia 13,861 523,563.51 0.37% 092528900 GlaxoSmithKline Plc 26,092 489,416.83 0.34% 891160954 Toronto-Dominion Bank (The) 11,126 473,011.14 0.33% B1527V903 Unilever NV 9,584 472,203.46 0.33% 624899902 KDDI Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Süss Microtec
    Süss MicroTec Germany/ Semiconductors Post results note Investment Research 7 November 2013 Hold Warning for 4Q13 – exiting permanent bonder clusters from Buy Downgrade to ‘Hold’ / PT lowered to EUR 8 (11) Share price: EUR 7.98 The facts: SMHN released 3Q13 sales of EUR 38.9m which was nearly perfectly closing price as of 06/11/2013 Target price: EUR 8.00 in line with our forecast of EUR 38.7m and better than the FactSet consensus of from Target Price: EUR EUR 37.8m. We noted a solid top line development in the Lithography segment 11.00 (revenues of EUR 27.8m vs. EUR 24.0m) and in Photomasks (EUR 6.5m vs. EUR Reuters/Bloomberg SMHNn.DE/SMH GY 5.0m). However, Bonder clearly fell short of expectations (EUR 3.1m vs. EUR 8.0m). Daily avg. no. trad. sh. 12 mth 82,024 The gross margin was released at 32.2% and was thus better than we expected Daily avg. trad. vol. 12 mth (m) 654.51 Price high 12 mth (EUR) 10.08 (28.9%). This deviation should be the reason for the better EBIT performance in the Price low 12 mth (EUR) 6.63 quarter. SMHN achieved an operating result of EUR 1.8m which compares to our Abs. perf. 1 mth 16.1% EUR 0.3m (FactSet EUR 0.2m). Abs. perf. 3 mth 16.8% SMHN published a net result of EUR 1.2m and an EPS of EUR 0.06. This Abs. perf. 12 mth 6.4% compares to our forecast of EUR -0.7m and EUR minus 0.03, respectively.
    [Show full text]