Charter School Petition Application and Instructions Conversion

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Charter School Petition Application and Instructions Conversion Charter School (including High School Clusters) “The mission of the Georgia Public Charter Schools Division Charter Schools Program is to 2053 Twin Towers East increase student achievement 205 Jesse Hill Jr. Drive, SE through academic and Atlanta, Georgia 30334 organizational innovation by 404-657-0515 (phone) encouraging local school districts to 404-657-6978 (fax) utilize the flexibility offered by http://public.doe.k12.ga.us/pea_charter.aspx chartering.” Wynnton Arts Academy, Columbus, GA May 2008 1 C. Application Checklist ALL APPLICANTS: Be sure that you have included each of the following as part of your petition application. All applicants must submit an ORIGINAL and TWO COPIES of each of the materials listed below, unless otherwise indicated. Charter Petition Cover Pages (original and two copies) (form attached below) Executive Summary (original and two copies) (instructions attached below) Charter Petition Checklist (original and two copies) (form attached below) Charter Petition (original and two copies) Charter Petition on CD, in Microsoft Word or .pdf format (one copy) Copy of Letter of Intent submitted to the local board of education and the State Board of Education (three copies) Any other documents necessary to respond to charter petition requirements (e.g., appendices) (original and two copies) RENEWAL APPLICANTS ONLY: A redlined version of the charter petition showing all additions and deletions (original and two copies) Applicants must send or deliver completed applications to: Georgia Department of Education Charter Schools Division 2053 Twin Towers East 205 Jesse Hill Jr. Drive, SE Atlanta, Georgia 30334 Wynnton Arts Academy, Columbus, GA May 2008 2 Conversion Charter Petition Cover Pages This form is for use by an existing public school seeking to convert to a charter school. Applicants must attach these petition cover pages (pages 4 to 15 of the application) to the front of the petition. Part I. Charter School Information Check one: x New Petition Renewal Petition Name of Proposed Charter School Wynnton Arts Academy______________ Local School System ____Muscogee County School District______________ School address 2303 Wynnton Road, Columbus, Georgia 31906 School contact person Nancy Johnson Principal Name Title Address of school contact 2303 Wynnton Road, Columbus, Georgia 31906 Telephone number of school contact (706) 748-3147 ____ Fax number of school contact (706) 748-3151 E-mail address of school contact [email protected] Grade Levels Served _____Pre-K - 5________ Ages Served _________4-12_____________ Proposed Opening/Renewal Date ___8/1/09____ Proposed Charter Term ____10 years_________ Wynnton Arts Academy, Columbus, GA May 2008 3 For each year of the proposed charter term, please indicate in the table below the number of pupils the charter school plans to serve. K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Total Yr 1 60 80 60 80 80 60 420 Yr 2 60 80 60 80 80 60 420 Yr 3 60 80 60 80 80 60 420 Yr 4 60 80 60 80 80 60 420 Yr 5 60 80 60 80 80 60 420 Yr 6 60 80 60 80 80 60 420 Yr 7 60 80 60 80 80 60 420 Yr 8 60 80 60 80 80 60 420 Yr 9 60 80 60 80 80 60 420 Yr 10 60 80 60 80 80 60 420 Is this school currently in, or has it ever been, in Needs Improvement status under NCLB? No X Yes If so, when? 1999-2000 through 2004-2005 (6 years) Wynnton Arts Academy, Columbus, GA May 2008 4 Part II. Assurances and Signatures 1. This petition has been agreed to, by secret ballot, by a majority of the faculty and instructional staff members at a meeting called with two weeks’ advance notice during which time a complete petition draft was available for review. Date of Vote February 7, 2005 Total Number of Faculty and Instructional Staff 43 Number Approving __43__ Percent Approving _100%___ Number Disapproving __0__ Percent Disapproving _0% _____________________________ Principal’s Signature Date 2. This petition has been agreed to, by secret ballot, by a majority of the parents or guardians of the students enrolled in the school who were present at a meeting called for the purpose of deciding whether to submit the petition. Two weeks’ advance notice of the meeting was published during which time a complete petition draft was available for review. Date of Meeting October 13, 2005 Total Number of Parents Attending Meeting 127 Number Approving 119 Percent Approving 94% Number Disapproving ___8___ Percent Disapproving __6%_ _____________________________ Principal’s Signature Date Wynnton Arts Academy, Columbus, GA May 2008 5 3. This charter petition was approved by the Board of Education on _____________________. Date _____________________________________ ________________________ Superintendent Date _____________________________________ ________________________ Chair, Local Board of Education Date 4. Petitioner(s) assure(s) that the proposed charter school programs, services, and activities will operate in accordance with the terms of the Charter and all applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules, and regulations. _____________________________________ ________________________ Authorized Representative, Charter School Date Page 4 of 5 Wynnton Arts Academy, Columbus, GA May 2008 6 Part III. Executive Summary Please provide an executive summary of the charter petition. The executive summary for a new charter school petition should be no more than (2) pages in length. The executive summary for a renewal charter school Petition ma y exceed two pages. The executive summary should follow the general format set forth below: Basic Information: Charter School Name: Wynnton Arts Academy Type: Conversion Approved by the Muscogee County School District on ______________________. Mission The Mission of Wynnton Arts Academy is to continue our tradition of excellence in education through the positive interaction of students, staff, parents and community in order to prepare for successful living by igniting the desire for life long learning through immersion in the Arts. Academic Program Strategies to increase student achievement: The academic program of Wynnton Arts Academy is aligned with the mission and vision of the school. To educate our students and integrate the arts within the curriculum, Wynnton Arts Academy has the following performance objectives: • To improve reading skills • To improve writing and communication skills • To improve inquiry and mathematical skills • To improve social and peer interactions through the implementation of fine arts • To raise student self-esteem • To improve community involvement and support of the Arts. Examples of organizational innovation: The goals and objectives of the academic program will be met through the integration of the arts throughout the curriculum and in the extended day program by following the Wynnton Arts Academy, Columbus, GA May 2008 7 guidelines set forth in the Georgia Performance Standards (GPS) and the National Standards for Art Education. Wynnton Arts Academy is a Title I School wide Program school that experienced six years of Needs Improvement status. As required by the No Child Left Behind Law, the faculty, staff, and stakeholders designed a plan to improve student achievement based on an arts integration model. In 2003-2004, prior to implementation of Arts Integration, 73% of students in the “All” category met or exceeded standards in English/Language Arts. Spring 2007 CRCT test scores demonstrated that 81.6% of our students met/exceeded standards. With respect to sub groups, black students increased their scores by 5.9%, students with disabilities increased their scores by 35.9%, and economically disadvantaged students increased their performance by 7%. ESOL students are classified as too few to measure as a sub group, although teacher analysis indicates that their scores improved significantly as well. In the area of mathematics, improvement in the “All” category increased from 66% to 75.9%. Sub- group performances also increased, as is demonstrated by black students (3.8% increase), students with disabilities (41.4% increase), and economically disadvantaged (10% increase). Again, ESOL students are classified as too few to measure as a sub group, but teacher analysis indicated significant improvement. This resulted in removal from the Needs Improvement status. The school has now achieved AYP (Adequate Yearly Progress) for the past three years. Organization Examples of organizational innovation: Wynnton Arts Academy is and will continue to be governed by the Wynnton Arts Governance Board, not undermining the guidelines set forth by the Muscogee County School District and the state of Georgia The community supports the charter petition. PTA members approved the request for a charter during a meeting at the beginning of the 2005-2006 school year. 100% of faculty and staff supported the charter petition. Operated by Education Management Organization: No Evidence of the petition being in the “public interest”: The Arts Integration Model incorporates drama, music, art, and dance into the existing curriculum. The Fine Arts instructors collaborate with classroom teachers to enhance instruction. In addition the students participate in one fine art class Monday through Thursday. On Friday thirty minute specialty classes are offered to small groups to perfect an art skill. It is in the public interest to produce students who can contribute to the community as a whole. Stake holders were surveyed, interviewed, and participated in all facets of the charter application development. Parents overwhelmingly supported our pursuit to become a Charter School. Parent and community volunteers were interviewed in order to gain a better understanding of how we can better support them in their efforts to support the students and teachers at Wynnton Arts Academy. Wynnton Arts Academy, Columbus, GA May 2008 8 Wynnton Arts Academy, Columbus, GA May 2008 9 Wynnton Arts Academy, Columbus, GA May 2008 10 Wynnton Arts Academy, Columbus, GA May 2008 11 Wynnton Arts Academy, Columbus, GA May 2008 12 Wynnton Arts Academy, Columbus, GA May 2008 13 LETTER OF INTENT Submitted to the Muscogee County School District in April 2005.
Recommended publications
  • Dramatizing Poetry in the Second Language Classroom STEPHEN

    Dramatizing Poetry in the Second Language Classroom STEPHEN

    English Teaching: Practice and Critique December, 2006, Volume 5, Number 3 http://education.waikato.ac.nz/research/files/etpc/2006v5n3art5.pdf pp. 127-136 Dramatizing poetry in the second language classroom STEPHEN ELTING American International School, Hong Kong ARTHUR FIRKINS Department of Linguistics, Macquarie University, Sydney ABSTRACT: Poetry performance is an approach to learning where students can use theatrical techniques to develop a response to the poem. This paper argues that ELL students can explore the aesthetic function of language and, more widely, develop confidence in using English as a communicative tool through the dramatization of poetry. We describe the process we have used to take a poem from the page to the stage and provide examples for ELL teachers to use this creative approach in their classrooms. KEYWORDS: Performance poetry, ELL (English Language learners), dramatizing poetry, verbal art, aesthetic function of language, drama and language learning, criticism and response. INTRODUCTION In order to reclaim the creative in the English classroom, educators should place verbal art at the heart of their English language programmes. Poetry is a rich language resource available to the English Language learner (ELL) and, as such, we argue that reading, interpreting and performing poetry should be a central pedagogical feature of the English programme. Poetry enables the exploration of sound, image and word association while extending the semantic resources available to students. However, current uses of poetry in the classroom more readily focus on eliciting oral or written responses to the poem from students. In contrast, although recognising that some rudimentary knowledge of the language and meaning of the poem is an important prerequisite for its understanding, we suggest that dramatizing the poem can also be a creative and interesting method through which ELL students can develop a response to the poem.
  • Writing Standards in Action Project Uses High Quality Student Writing Samples to Illustrate What Performance to Grade Level Standards Looks Like—In Action

    Writing Standards in Action Project Uses High Quality Student Writing Samples to Illustrate What Performance to Grade Level Standards Looks Like—In Action

    GRADE FRAMEWORK / CONTENT STANDARDS ADDRESSED: Massachusetts Curriculum Framework 5 for ELA and Literacy (2017) “What should good student writing at this grade level look like?” The answer lies in the writing itself. The Writing Standards in Action Project uses high quality student writing samples to illustrate what performance to grade level standards looks like—in action. Grade 5 English Language Arts Narrate (Personal Narrative) King-Da-Ka Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Writing Standards in Action Project www.doe.mass.edu/candi/wsa/ Page 1 SAMPLE A5-2 (Narrate—Personal Narrative) GRADE FRAMEWORK / CONTENT STANDARDS ADDRESSED: Background Information Massachusetts Curriculum Framework 5 for ELA and Literacy (2017) Writing Sample Title: STANDARDS-BASED COMMENTARY King-Da-Ka The student writing sample that follows includes standards-based commentary. Text Type and Purpose: Narrate The commentary found in this column describes how the writing meets the Grade level/Content area: Grade 5 English Language Arts standards in the Massachusetts Curriculum Type of Assignment: Personal narrative Framework for English Language Arts and Literacy (2017) and other content Standards Addressed: (W.5.3), (W.5.4), (W.5.5), frameworks when applicable. (L.5.1), (L.5.2), (L.5.3) See descriptions of these standards in the right column of the next page. Understanding the Standards-Based Commentary Other Content/Frameworks Addressed: 1. Grade-specific standards addressed are: Massachusetts Science and Technology/Engineering Curriculum Framework (2006) • Listed in the column to the right of the student work by strand, grade, and number Massachusetts History and Social Science (or number and letter, where applicable) Curriculum Framework (2003) • Marked by a colored block with a letter code, also in the column to the right of Highlights: the student work EXAMPLE: This sample of student work meets grade level standards.
  • English Language Arts

    English Language Arts

    Curriculum Guide English Language Arts Madison Public Schools Madison, Connecticut www.madison.k12.ct.us June, 2002 Table of Contents Foreword...................................................................................................................................1 Program Overview...................................................................................................................3 Program Components and Framework • Program Components and Framework .........................................................................4 • Classroom Environment Statement................................................................................6 • Grouping Guidelines......................................................................................................7 • English Language Arts Philosophy................................................................................8 • English Language Arts Goals, K-12..............................................................................9 Learner Outcomes (K - 12) Scope and Sequence • Student Outcomes and Assessments - Grades K – 3 ...................................................11 • Student Outcomes and Assessments - Grades 4 - 5.....................................................49 • Student Outcomes and Assessments - Grades 6 – 8 ....................................................89 • Student Outcomes and Assessments / Course Descriptions - Grades 9 - 12 .............135 • Program Support / Celebration Statement .................................................................315
  • Investigating the Relevance and Importance of English Language Arts Content Knowledge Areas for Beginning Elementary School Teachers

    Investigating the Relevance and Importance of English Language Arts Content Knowledge Areas for Beginning Elementary School Teachers

    Research Memorandum ETS RM–16-08 Investigating the Relevance and Importance of English Language Arts Content Knowledge Areas for Beginning Elementary School Teachers Michelle P. Martin-Raugh Richard J. Tannenbaum Clyde M. Reese Jonathan H. Steinberg Geoffrey C. Phelps Jun Xu August 2016 ETS Research Memorandum Series EIGNOR EXECUTIVE EDITOR James Carlson Principal Psychometrician ASSOCIATE EDITORS Beata Beigman Klebanov Anastassia Loukina Senior Research Scientist Research Scientist Heather Buzick Donald Powers Research Scientist Managing Principal Research Scientist Brent Bridgeman Gautam Puhan Distinguished Presidential Appointee Principal Psychometrician Keelan Evanini John Sabatini Research Director Managing Principal Research Scientist Marna Golub-Smith Matthias von Davier Principal Psychometrician Senior Research Director Shelby Haberman Rebecca Zwick Distinguished Presidential Appointee Distinguished Presidential Appointee PRODUCTION EDITORS Kim Fryer Ayleen Gontz Manager, Editing Services Senior Editor Since its 1947 founding, ETS has conducted and disseminated scientific research to support its products and services, and to advance the measurement and education fields. In keeping with these goals, ETS is committed to making its research freely available to the professional community and to the general public. Published accounts of ETS research, including papers in the ETS Research Memorandum series, undergo a formal peer-review process by ETS staff to ensure that they meet established scientific and professional standards. All such ETS-conducted peer reviews are in addition to any reviews that outside organizations may provide as part of their own publication processes. Peer review notwithstanding, the positions expressed in the ETS Research Memorandum series and other published accounts of ETS research are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Officers andT rustees of Educational Testing Service.
  • English Language Arts Content Knowledge Area Essay

    English Language Arts Content Knowledge Area Essay

    Lewis & Clark Graduate School of Education and Counseling Master of Arts in Teaching: Secondary Content Knowledge Essay: English Language Arts Applicant’s name: ________________________________ Major(s) and Degrees(s): _____________________________________________________ A degree in English or a related major from an accredited institution is accepted as evidence for sufficient foundational knowledge in your discipline for admission into our MAT English Language Arts program. Applicants with a degree in a related field need to provide additional information to ensure that sufficient foundation knowledge has been attained. In either case, our MAT program will build on and enhance the content knowledge you bring to the classroom. The Content Knowledge Essay is required of ALL English Language Arts applicants with or without a degree in English Language Arts. Below is a list of English Language Arts knowledge areas identified by Oregon licensure requirements and the National Council of Teachers of English regarding teacher candidate content knowledge. 1. Rate your level of experience on a scale of 1-5 (1 = little or no experience and 5 = highly experienced.) 2. Indicate under the “Evidence” column where and how you received this experience (coursework, employment, personal research). For all coursework, please list the course (i.e., Biology 101). Feel free to attach additional sheets if necessary or recreate this document in order to type your responses. ALL APPLICANTS Content Area Rating Evidence Knowledge of literature (broad range of literature and analysis/interpretation) Knowledge of writing processes (strategies and generating different forms of writing for a variety of audiences and purposes) Knowledge of reading processes (strategies and approaches to texts) Knowledge of oral and visual literacy (speaking and creating visual images for a variety of purposes and audiences) Knowledge of language (acquisition, English grammar/conventions, and linguistics) Please submit this form through the online application process.
  • Appeal Letter

    Appeal Letter

    Appeal Letter Summary of the Timeline Appeal Addendum OSDE Supplemental Online Course Provider List Edgenuity Awards Revised ABLE Appeal Application Sample Edgenuity Student E-mail Notice Sample Performance Dashboard News Release Statewide Virtual Charter School Board Virtual Charter Application Rubric Witness List Letter of Support from Senator Ralph Shortey State Board of Education Notice of Hearing Statewide Virtual Charter School Board Memorandum of Decision SB 267 Virtual Charter Application Checklist Statewide Virtual Charter School Board Oklahoma State Department of Education Virtual Charter Application Checklist Virtual Charter Applicant Reviewed by Submission Date Public Presentation Date Review date Board Decision Date Item/Question Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Mission & Organizational Structure 1. Mission Statement 2. Description of Organizational structure 3. Description of governing body 4. Financial plan for first three (3) years of operation 5. Description of personnel with financial responsibility 6. Description of hiring policy 7. Name of applicant 8. Description of facility 9. Description of grades being served 10. Technology Capacity—How would you describe your “Learning Management System?” What are the limitations of your LMS, and how will this affect your enrollment capacity? In the event of outages or complications with your LMS, what are the protocols designed to address those issues? How will you inform students and families of those protocols? 11. System Accessibility—Do you anticipate any Service Level Agreements (SLA)? If so, how would you describe your SLAs for system accessibility? If not, how will you ensure system accessibility? How would you describe your methods for securing and monitoring access to sensitive and confidential information? 12. How would you describe your anticipated student-to-teacher ratios? Measurement & Accountability 13.
  • Ela Best Standards

    Ela Best Standards

    Table of Contents Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Standards Map ............................................................................................................................................ 10 Progression of Foundations Benchmarks .................................................................................................... 11 Spiraled Standards in a Vertical Progression .............................................................................................. 13 Kindergarten ........................................................................................................................................... 26 Foundational Skills ............................................................................................................................. 26 Reading ............................................................................................................................................... 27 Communication ................................................................................................................................... 29 Vocabulary .......................................................................................................................................... 32 Sample texts by
  • Table File Items for January 26, 2015, Regular School Board Meeting

    Table File Items for January 26, 2015, Regular School Board Meeting

    NORTHFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS Office of the Superintendent Memorandum TO: Board of Education FROM: L. Chris Richardson, Ph.D., Superintendent RE: Table File Items for January 26, 2015, Regular School Board Meeting VII. Superintendent’s Report B. Items for Consent Grouping 2. Personnel Items. a. Appointments * 7. Pam Hanson (Swanson), GenEd Educational Assistant at die High School for 6 hours/day beginning 01/28/2015; Step 1, $13.21/hour. 8. Katrina Warner, GenEd Educational Assistant/Sibcare at the NCRC/ECFE for up to 8 hours/week beginning 01/28/2015; Step 1, $13.21/hour. 9. Community Sendees Fall/Winter/Spring Recreation positions beginning 01/24/2015 — 05/31/2015:_Savannah Dimick, Basketball Supervisor beginning 02/07/2015 - 05/31/2015; $10/hour; Michael Kopp - Birthday Party Staff beginning 01/24/2015 — 05/31/2015; $8/hour. b. Increase/Decrease/Cliange in Assignment 11. David Kurth, Evening Engineer/Security at the Middle School, change to Custodial Engineer (Day Shift) at the Middle School beginning 02/02/2015. c. Resignations/Retirements 7. Katie Bauernfeind, Building Nurse at Prairie Creek, Arcadia and St. Dominic’s, resignation effective 01/20/2015. 8. Robert McCarthy, Special Education Teacher at the High School, resignation effective 01/26/2015. * Conditional offers of employment arc subject to successful completion of a criminal background check. Northfield Charter Schools Arcadia«* Data Sheet CI H A R TE R S C H O O L J Minnesofii ('ompi'cliciishc Assessments Arcadia Charter School Mission 2014 MCA Scores It is the mission of Arcadia Charter School to prepare our stu­ 2012 2013 2014 dents to transition intellectually, emotionally, and ethically to — 70.7%| 67.7% higher education and future employment.
  • Grade 6 English Language Arts/Literacy Narrative Writing Task

    Grade 6 English Language Arts/Literacy Narrative Writing Task

    Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers Grade 6 English Language Arts/Literacy Narrative Writing Task 2017 Released Items English Language Arts/Literacy 2017 Released Items: Grade 6 Narrative Writing Task The Narrative Writing Task focuses on one literary text. Students read the text, answer questions, and write a narrative response that is tied to and draws on the text. The 2017 blueprint for PARCC’s grade 6 Narrative Writing Task includes Evidence-Based Selected Response/Technology-Enhanced Constructed Response items as well as one Prose Constructed Response prompt. Included in this document: • Answer key and standards alignment • PDFs of each item with the associated text Additional related materials not included in this document: • Sample scored student responses with practice papers • PARCC Scoring Rubric for Prose Constructed Response Items • Guide to English Language Arts/Literacy Released Items: Understanding Scoring 2016 • PARCC English Language Arts/Literacy Assessment: General Scoring Rules for the 2016 Summative Assessment English Language Arts/Literacy PARCC Release Items Answer and Alignment Document ELA/Literacy: Grade 6 Text Type: NWT Passage(s): from Spy Cat Item Code Answer(s) Standards/Evidence Statement Alignment VF633103 Item Type: EBSR L 6.4.1 Part A: D RL 6.1.1 Part B: A RL 6.4.1 VF633108 Item Type: EBSR RL 6.1.1 Part A: C RL 6.6.1 Part B: A VH029994 Item Type: TECR RL 6.1.1 Part A: RL 6.3.2 Part B: VF633153 Item Type: EBSR RL 6.1.1 Part A: A RL 6.6.1 Part B: D VF633166 Item Type: PCR Refer to Grade 6 Scoring Rubric VF633112 Item Type: EBSR (additional item) RL 6.1.1 Part A: A RL 6.6.1 Part B: C English Language Arts/Literacy Today you will read the prologue to the story Spy Cat.
  • Unit 4 Listen, My Children Poems for Fourth Graders Teacher Guide Core Knowledge Language Arts® Knowledge Core

    Unit 4 Listen, My Children Poems for Fourth Graders Teacher Guide Core Knowledge Language Arts® Knowledge Core

    Unit 4 Listen, My Children Poems for Fourth Graders Teacher Guide Core Knowledge Language Arts® Knowledge Core GRADE 4 GRADE Unit 4 Listen, My Children Poems for Fourth Graders Teacher Guide GRADE 4 Core Knowledge Language Arts® Listen, My ChildrenTeacher Guide was made possible with support from the Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Foundation. We would also like to thank Dr. Emily Chiariello (http://www.chiariello-consulting.com/) and Dr. Ebony Thomas (http://scholar.gse.upenn.edu/thomas) for their review of this Teacher Guide and for their insights and recommendations for resources and revisions, which have greatly enhanced this Teacher Guide. We also thank Robin McClellan and the teachers and coaches of Sulllivan County. This OER unit is offered as a supplement to the core CKLA program developed by the Core Knowledge Foundation. The unit is not part of the current CKLA print program available for purchase from Amplify. However, as we gather more feedback on how this unit works in classrooms, Amplify and the Core Knowledge Foundation will consider how this unit may be incorporated into future iterations of the core CKLA program sold by Amplify. Creative Commons Licensing This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. You are free: to Share—to copy, distribute, and transmit the work to Remix—to adapt the work Under the following conditions: Attribution—You must attribute the work in the following manner: This work is based on an original work of the Core Knowledge® Foundation (www.coreknowledge.org) made available through licensing under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
  • An English Language Arts Curriculum Framework for American Public Schools

    An English Language Arts Curriculum Framework for American Public Schools

    An English Language Arts Curriculum Framework for American Public Schools An English Language Arts Curriculum Framework for American Public Schools: A Model For use by any state or school district without charge Chief author: Sandra Stotsky Professor Emerita, University of Arkansas February 2013 1 An English Language Arts Curriculum Framework for American Public Schools Table of Contents Purpose and Sources of this Curriculum Framework 3 Guiding Principles 4 Overview of General Standards and Learning Standards: 7 1. Discussion and Group Work 10 2. Oral Presentation 12 3. Structure and Conventions of Modern English 15 4. Vocabulary and Concept Development 17 5. Formal and Informal English 21 6. Foundations of Reading and Spelling 24 7. Nonfiction 31 8. Fiction 36 9. Poetry 39 10. Drama 41 11. Myth, Legend, Traditional Narrative, and Classical Literature 43 12. The Research Process 48 13. Analytical Writing 51 14. Persuasive Writing 54 15. Personal Writing 56 Appendix A: Suggested Authors and Illustrators Who Reflect Our Common Literary and Cultural Heritage Appendix B: Suggested Authors and Illustrators of World Literature and Twentieth- Century American Literature Appendix C: Glossary of Terms Appendix D: A Perspective on the Goals and Content of English Language Arts Instruction in this Country Appendix E: The Limited English Proficient Student in the English Language Arts Classroom Appendix F: How Literature Can Be Related to Key American Historical Documents Appendix G: Independent Evaluative Comments 2 An English Language Arts Curriculum Framework for American Public Schools Purpose of this Curriculum Framework This curriculum framework provides standards designed to guide reading and English teachers in the development of a coherent English language arts curriculum from PreK to 12.
  • English Language Arts

    English Language Arts

    ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS English language arts, TK–12, focuses on the processes by which we learn and use language. Students increase their communication abilities through reading, writing, speaking, and listening experiences that are related to and reinforce one another. Instruction respects the home language of students and builds from this base the English language skills needed to communicate effectively. ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS STANDARDS Educational standards describe what students should know and be able to do in each subject in each grade. In California, the State Board of Education decides on the standards for all students, from kindergarten through grade 12. In 2010, California joined a large majority of other states to adopt the same standards for English language arts and mathematics. These standards are called the Common Core State Standards (CCSS). Having the same standards means students experience consistent expectations, even if they change schools or move to a different state. Teachers, parents, and education experts designed the CCSS to prepare students for success in college and the workplace. The San Diego Unified School District began full implementation of the CCSS during the 2014–15 school year which is reflected in the following course descriptions. The Common Core State Standards for English language arts are available at: www.cde.ca.gov/re/cc/ The state’s recently revised curriculum framework for English language arts and English language development is available at: www.cde.ca.gov/ci/rl/cf/index.asp CONTENTS This