Native Plant Guide Fleming Park Riparian Demonstration Garden
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Plum Crazy: Rediscovering Our Lost Prunus Resources W.R
Plum Crazy: Rediscovering Our Lost Prunus Resources W.R. Okie1 U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service, Southeastern Fruit and Tree Nut Research Laboratory, 21 Dunbar Road, Byron, GA 31008 Recent utilization of genetic resources of peach [Prunus persica (‘Quetta’ from India, ‘John Rivers’ from England, and ‘Lippiatts’ (L.) Batsch] and Japanese plum (P. salicina Lindl. and hybrids) has from New Zealand) were critical to the development of modern been limited in the United States compared with that of many crops. nectarines in California (Taylor, 1959). However, most fresh-market Difficulties in collection, importation, and quarantine throughput have peach breeding programs in the United States have used germplasm limited the germplasm available. Prunus is more difficult to preserve developed in the United States for cultivar development (Okie, 1998). because more space is needed than for small fruit crops, and the shorter Only in New Jersey was there extensive hybridization with imported life of trees relative to other tree crops because of disease and insect clones, and most of these hybrids have not resulted in named cultivars problems. Lack of suitable rootstocks has also reduced tree life. The (Blake and Edgerton, 1946). trend toward fewer breeding programs, most of which emphasize In recent years, interest in collecting and utilizing novel germplasm “short-term” (long-term compared to most crops) commercial cultivar has increased. For example, non-melting clingstone peaches from development to meet immediate industry needs, has also contributed Mexico and Brazil have been used in the joint USDA–Univ. of to reduced use of exotic material. Georgia–Univ. of Florida breeding program for the development of Probably all modern commercial peaches grown in the United early ripening, non-melting, fresh-market peaches for low-chill areas States are related to ‘Chinese Cling’, a peach imported from China (Beckman and Sherman, 1996). -
Vegetation Unit Summaries for Springwater Corridor (SCOR)
Vegetation Unit Summaries for Springwater Corridor (SCOR) Report date: 3/27/2007 '*' = non-native invasive species Visit data as of: 3/27/2007 Unit rSCOR*104 Size: 0.16 Acres NVCS Subclass: Deciduous forest % Tree canopy: 60% % Non-Native Cover: 90 Slope: na Aspect: na Visit date: 8/2/2006 Wetland indicators: Streams, Hydrophilic Vegetation. (Surface water was present) Dominant Trees: red alder (Alnus rubra). Dominant Shrubs: Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor*). Shrubs > 20% cover: red-osier dogwood (Cornus sericea ssp. sericea). Dominant Grasses: reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea* > 50% cover). Additional Invasives: yellow flag iris (Iris pseudacorus*), bittersweet nightshade (Solanum dulcamara*). Ecological Health: Fair. Primary Management concerns: heavy level of invasive species, Stream Bank Erosion. Unit rSCOR*105 Size: 7.54 Acres NVCS Subclass: Deciduous woodland % Tree canopy: 55% % Non-Native Cover: 90 Slope: na Aspect: na Visit date: 8/2/2006 Wetland indicators: Streams, Hydrophilic Vegetation. (Surface water was present) Dominant Trees: red alder (Alnus rubra). Dominant Shrubs: Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor*). Shrubs > 20% cover: red-osier dogwood (Cornus sericea ssp. sericea). Dominant Grasses: reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea* > 50% cover). Additional Invasives: yellow flag iris (Iris pseudacorus*), bittersweet nightshade (Solanum dulcamara*). Ecological Health: Fair. Primary Management concerns: heavy level of invasive species, Stream Bank Erosion. Unit rSCOR*108 Size: 0.32 Acres NVCS Subclass: Deciduous woodland % Tree canopy: 40% % Non-Native Cover: 90 Slope: na Aspect: na Visit date: 8/2/2006 Wetland indicators: Streams, Hydrophilic Vegetation. (Surface water was present) Dominant Trees: red alder (Alnus rubra). Dominant Shrubs: Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor*). Dominant Grasses: reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea* > 50% cover). -
The Pubescent-Fruited Species of Prunus of the Southwestern States
THE PUBESCENT-FRUITED SPECIES OF PRUNUS OF THE SOUTHWESTERN STATES By SIMS C. MASON, Arboriculturist, Crop Physiology and Breeding Investigations, Bureau of Plant Industry INTRODUCTION The species of the genus Prunus described in this article occupy a unique position in the flora of the western United States from the fact that their relationship with the wild plums of the country is remote and they are more closely allied to some of the Asiatic species of this genus. Their economic importance arises chiefly from their close adaptation to the climatic and soil conditions of the Southwest, where fluctuations of heat and cold, severe drought, and considerable alkalinity of the soil must be endured by most tree crops. Adaptable stocks for the cultivated forms of Prunus capable of meeting such conditions are eagerly sought. Species with such characters which are capable of being hybridized with the old-established cultivated forms of the genus offer attractive possibilities to the plant breeder. This is especially true of the one edible-fruited form, Prunus texana, which affords in aroma and flavor of fruit most attractive characters for combi- nation with other stone fruits of larger size and more staple commercial character. Instead of forming a homogeneous group, as has usually been be- lieved, these species fall into small groups of quite diverse character and affinities. To the plant breeder and student of their economic possibilities these relationships are of such importance that the following detailed study of them is deemed essential -
Taming the Wild Beach Plum
Taming the Wild Beach Plum Richard H. Uva Beach plum is a conspicuous shrub of coastal plant communities in the north- eastern United States because of its prolific bloom, prized fruit, and perseverance in a seemingly hostile environment. Several attempts have been made to bring this wild fruit into cultivation. ’ve known the beach plum (Prunus maritima Marsh.) I since childhood on Cape Cod, where it was the only woody plant in the sea of dune grass that sepa- rated the ocean from the rest of the world. Michael Dirr writes in his Manual of Cultivated Plants that “This species abounds on Cape Cod, Massachusetts, and is one of the Cape Codder’s cher- ALL PHOTOGRAPHS ARE BY THE AUTHOR ished plants.” In fact, I would say that Cape Codders feel a sense of entitlement to the species and its fruit. The beach plum is much appreciated for its profuse white bloom in spring, but it is in late summer, when people gather the fruit from the wild for jelly and other preserves, that its impor- The fruits of Prunus maritima are small plums—one-half to an inch (1.5 to tance to the local culture becomes 2.5 cm) in diameter—that ripen from late August through September. most apparent. The long-time gatherers have secret spots and favorite bushes, breviligulata), beach pea (Lathyrus maritimus), and strangers carrying pails in the dunes are and seaside goldenrod (Solidago sempervirens). viewed with suspicion. In a good crop year the When I learned that William Clark of the Cape race to harvest is so competitive that the fruit Cod Cooperative Extension and a small group of is sometimes picked when barely ripe. -
Native Plant List CITY of OREGON CITY 320 Warner Milne Road , P.O
Native Plant List CITY OF OREGON CITY 320 Warner Milne Road , P.O. Box 3040, Oregon City, OR 97045 Phone: (503) 657-0891, Fax: (503) 657-7892 Scientific Name Common Name Habitat Type Wetland Riparian Forest Oak F. Slope Thicket Grass Rocky Wood TREES AND ARBORESCENT SHRUBS Abies grandis Grand Fir X X X X Acer circinatumAS Vine Maple X X X Acer macrophyllum Big-Leaf Maple X X Alnus rubra Red Alder X X X Alnus sinuata Sitka Alder X Arbutus menziesii Madrone X Cornus nuttallii Western Flowering XX Dogwood Cornus sericia ssp. sericea Crataegus douglasii var. Black Hawthorn (wetland XX douglasii form) Crataegus suksdorfii Black Hawthorn (upland XXX XX form) Fraxinus latifolia Oregon Ash X X Holodiscus discolor Oceanspray Malus fuscaAS Western Crabapple X X X Pinus ponderosa Ponderosa Pine X X Populus balsamifera ssp. Black Cottonwood X X Trichocarpa Populus tremuloides Quaking Aspen X X Prunus emarginata Bitter Cherry X X X Prunus virginianaAS Common Chokecherry X X X Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas Fir X X Pyrus (see Malus) Quercus garryana Garry Oak X X X Quercus garryana Oregon White Oak Rhamnus purshiana Cascara X X X Salix fluviatilisAS Columbia River Willow X X Salix geyeriana Geyer Willow X Salix hookerianaAS Piper's Willow X X Salix lucida ssp. lasiandra Pacific Willow X X Salix rigida var. macrogemma Rigid Willow X X Salix scouleriana Scouler Willow X X X Salix sessilifoliaAS Soft-Leafed Willow X X Salix sitchensisAS Sitka Willow X X Salix spp.* Willows Sambucus spp.* Elderberries Spiraea douglasii Douglas's Spiraea Taxus brevifolia Pacific Yew X X X Thuja plicata Western Red Cedar X X X X Tsuga heterophylla Western Hemlock X X X Scientific Name Common Name Habitat Type Wetland Riparian Forest Oak F. -
Fraxinus Spp. Family: Oleaceae American Ash
Fraxinus spp. Family: Oleaceae American Ash Ash ( Fraxinus sp.) is composed of 40 to 70 species, with 21 in Central and North America and 50 species in Eurasia. All species look alike microscopically. The name fraxinus is the classical Latin name for ash. Fraxinus americana*- American White Ash, Biltmore Ash, Biltmore White Ash, Canadian Ash, Cane Ash, Green Ash, Ground Ash, Mountain Ash, Quebec Ash, Red Ash, Smallseed White Ash, White Ash , White River Ash, White Southern Ash Fraxinus anomala-Dwarf Ash, Singleleaf Ash Fraxinus berlandierana-Berlandier Ash , Mexican Ash Fraxinus caroliniana-Carolina Ash , Florida Ash, Pop Ash, Swamp Ash, Water Ash Fraxinus cuspidata-Flowering Ash, Fragrant Ash Fraxinus dipetala-California Flwoering Ash, California Shrub Ash, Foothill Ash, Flowering Ash, Fringe- flowering Ash, Mountain Ash, Two-petal Ash Fraxinus gooddingii-Goodding Ash Fraxinus greggii-Dogleg Ash, Gregg Ash, Littleleaf Ash Fraxinus latifolia*-Basket Ash, Oregon Ash, Water Ash, White Ash Fraxinus nigra*-American Black Ash, Basket Ash, Black Ash , Brown Ash, Canadian Ash, Hoop Ash, Splinter Ash, Swamp Ash, Water Ash Fraxinus papillosa-Chihuahua Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica*-Bastard Ash, Black Ash, Blue Ash, Brown Ash, Canadian Ash, Darlington Ash, Gray Ash, Green Ash , Piss Ash, Pumpkin Ash, Red Ash, Rim Ash, River Ash, Soft Ash,Swamp Ash, Water Ash, White Ash Fraxinus profunda*-Pumpkin Ash, Red Ash Fraxinus quadrangulata*-Blue Ash , Virginia Ash Fraxinus texensis-Texas Ash Fraxinus velutina-Arizona Ash, Desert Ash, Leatherleaf Ash, Modesto Ash, Smooth Ash, Toumey Ash, Velvet Ash (* commercial species) Distribution The north temperate regions of the globe. The Tree Ashes are trees or shrubs with large, opposite, pinnately compound leaves, which are shed in the fall. -
THE POL&IHATXON STATUS of PRUNUS SUBCQRDATA by LEWIS
THE POL&IHATXON STATUS OF PRUNUS SUBCQRDATA by LEWIS ANGLE BAMMEfiS A THESIS submittod to 0KEO0M STATE COLt«EGB in partial fulfillsont of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIBSCI June 1949 APPROVED: Head of pe^artment of Horticulture In Charge of Major ... i tyf fin' i in — w—r i ,.,... i Chairman of School Graduate Committee ' -*• .~.- -— ^. ^. ^^_^y^ Dean of Graduate School 7— 3" ; ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to express his grateful appre- ciation for the valuable assistance rendered by the many persons cooperating in this atudy* He is particularly Indebted to Professor Henry Hartmen, whose guidance and generous help carried this work to its completion. To A* H. Roberts, Assistant Horticulturaliat of the Experi- ment Station, the author is deeply indebted for helpful assistance in all phases of the problem without which the study would not have reached a successful conclusion, L. A, H. Tmm OF CONTESTS Paga Introduction ..*.......... 1 History ............ 1 Burbank^s work with the wild plum » ... 1 Sisson plvtm ............ 2 Botanical Bascription * . ........ 4 Original desorlption ....»...* 4 Sargent's description. ....*.•. 4 Variety g^lloggii ....... ♦ . 9 Variety ftyegana ...... * -« . 10 Delimitations ............. 11 Variety selection and testing * . * . II Follina^ion studies ......... 11 Rootstook studies ••...••... 11 Botanical relationship and aeearate descriptions. • • . • « • • . 11 Origin of hybrid types . « . ♦ « » . * IS Seed or Timeliness of The Study •s; Development of plum in southern Oregon ... IS Orchard culture in XaUfce County . , . * 13 Distribution • . • . • . Sarly writers* reports ........ 15 Soil preference ...» « . • . 16 Most productive plants . .♦».♦. 16 Factor of location ......... 16 fruit Setting .......... 19 Processes taking place within the flower . * 19 Formation of pollen and embryo sac * .. -
15-1119 Project Overview
#15-1119 Project Overview McCormick Creek Riparian Restoration Bank & Riparian Vegetation 1.2 acres Floodplain Terrace 15 acres Species Common name Density Species Common name Density Cornus sericea Red-osier dogwood Cornus sericea Red-osier dogwood Lonicera involucrata Black twinberrry Lonicera involucrata Black twinberrry Physocarpus captitatus Pacific ninebark Physocarpus captitatus Pacific ninebark 1,500/acre 700/acre Salix lasiandra Pacific willow Salix lasiandra Pacific willow Salix sitchensis Sitka willow Salix sitchensis Sitka willow Spirea douglasii Douglas' spirea Spirea douglasii Douglas' spirea Alnus rubra Red alder Acer macrophyllum Bigleaf maple Crataegus douglasii Douglas hawthorn Alnus rubra Red alder Fraxinus latifolia Oregon ash 800/acre Crataegus douglasii Douglas hawthorn Populus trichocarpa Black cottonwood Fraxinus latifolia Oregon ash 900/acre Pyrus fusca Pacific crabapple Populus trichocarpa Black cottonwood Pyrus fusca Pacific crabapple Thuja plicata Western red-cedar McCormick Creek 01 (Tier 2) ◦ Received highest score - Lower EF Lewis Assessment ◦ Coho ◦ Steelhead – upper reaches ◦ Chinook – juvenile usage ◦ Chum? Create resilient riparian and floodplain plant communities Create in-stream habitat Improve floodplain function Improve water quality impairments impacting salmonids and other aquatic species 16+ acres Beaver ½ mile of stream corridor Targeted species High density – 1,600 to Long term strategy 2,300 stems/acre Replicate Lockwood Maintenance Creek successes McCormick Creek Riparian Restoration -
Title Text Here Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest
Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest Title text here 2011 Native Plant Material Accomplishments 2011 Seed production: • 819 lbs. of Roemer’s fescue from Benson Farms • 300 lbs. of Blue Wild Rye from Pacific Northwest Natives • 300 lbs. of California fescue from J. H. Stone Nursery • 1st year California brome from Pacific Northwest Natives New contracts were awarded and funds obligated to produce: California fescue at J. Herbert Stone Nursery 2011 Wild Collections: • 10 lbs. Sitanion hystrix, low elevation, Siskiyou Mtns. R.D. • 18 lbs. Festuca viridula, high elevation, with Ski Ashland • Shrub & forb seed collection for Blue Ledge Mine restoration • Acnatherum lemmonii, Festuca roemeri, and Elymus glaucus on Wild Rivers Ranger District • Small amounts of Fraxinus latifolia, Rubus parviflorus, Lonicera hispidula, Acer macrophyllum, and Thermopsis gracilis for container production on our westside Ranger Districts. 2011 Container production and outplanting: • 2,500 container (D40) plugs from nine different native plant species Figure 2. Powers High School Native Plant were in production at Dorena Genetic Resource Center in Cottage Nursery student employees learning how the Grove and Clearwater Native Nursery in Redmond. Outplanted many Dorena Genetic Resource Center grows and at culvert replacement sites. Also 500 Oregon white oak delivered by cares for native plants. Powers High School. • Clintonia andrewsiana, Sidalcea malachroides, Ericameria Native Plant Materials Program funding: arborescens, and Illiamna latibracteata are being grown for rare plant $23,000(NFTM), $5,000 (CWKV), $9,000 restoration and re-introduction projects, (about 1,000 containers at (NFVW), $8,000 (CMRD), $ 6,000 (NFN3) = Berry Botanic Garden & Flora Pacifica Nursery). $51,000 total Other Projects: Partners/Contractors/Cooperators: Powers •65 older native grass seed lot High School, Pacific Northwest Natives. -
We Hope You Find This Field Guide a Useful Tool in Identifying Native Shrubs in Southwestern Oregon
We hope you find this field guide a useful tool in identifying native shrubs in southwestern Oregon. 2 This guide was conceived by the “Shrub Club:” Jan Walker, Jack Walker, Kathie Miller, Howard Wagner and Don Billings, Josephine County Small Woodlands Association, Max Bennett, OSU Extension Service, and Brad Carlson, Middle Rogue Watershed Council. Photos: Text: Jan Walker Max Bennett Max Bennett Jan Walker Financial support for this guide was contributed by: • Josephine County Small • Silver Springs Nursery Woodlands Association • Illinois Valley Soil & Water • Middle Rogue Watershed Council Conservation District • Althouse Nursery • OSU Extension Service • Plant Oregon • Forest Farm Nursery Acknowledgements Helpful technical reviews were provided by Chris Pearce and Molly Sullivan, The Nature Conservancy; Bev Moore, Middle Rogue Watershed Council; Kristi Mergenthaler and Rachel Showalter, Bureau of Land Management. The format of the guide was inspired by the OSU Extension Service publication Trees to Know in Oregon by E.C. Jensen and C.R. Ross. Illustrations of plant parts on pages 6-7 are from Trees to Know in Oregon (used by permission). All errors and omissions are the responsibility of the authors. Book formatted & designed by: Flying Toad Graphics, Grants Pass, Oregon, 2007 3 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................ 4 Plant parts ................................................................................... 6 How to use the dichotomous keys ........................................... -
Phylogeny of Fraxinus Sect. Melioides (Oleaceae): Review and an Alternative Hypothesis
Nesom, G.L. 2014. Phylogeny of Fraxinus sect. Melioides (Oleaceae): Review and an alternative hypothesis. Phytoneuron 2014-95: 1–9. Published 14 October 2014. ISSN 2153 733X PHYLOGENY OF FRAXINUS SECT. MELIOIDES (OLEACEAE): REVIEW AND AN ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS GUY L. NESOM 2925 Hartwood Drive Fort Worth, Texas 76109 ABSTRACT Molecular-phylogenetic hypotheses for the species of Fraxinus sect. Melioides by Jeandroz (1997), Wallander (2008), and Hinsinger et al. (2013) are summarized and reviewed. There is disagreement among them and unexpected arrangements suggest that either misidentifications or speciation by hybridization, or both, may have affected the conclusions. An alternative phylogenetic hypothesis, subjectively developed mostly on the basis of morphology and geography, is presented here to summarize points of agreement and what seems plausible, perhaps to serve as a guide in further investigations. Sect Melioides is recognized here as comprising fifteen species divided informally among five groups: the Americana group (5 species), the Pennsylvanica group (7 species), and the Uhdei, Latifolia, and Papillosa groups (each with 1 species). Molecular data indicate that the American F. cuspidata and the Asian F. platypoda , F. chiisanensis , and F. spaethiana are closely related to sect. Melioides –– these 4 species are regarded here as "aff. sect. Melioides ," perhaps warranting separate formal recognition, since, if added to sect. Melioides , its morphological integrity is weakened. Recent research by Hinsinger et al. (2013) is primarily -
Draft Spring Park Management Plan 2013
Spring Park Natural Area Management Plan North Clackamas Parks and Recreation Diistrict 12-2013 Draft Spring Park Management Plan 2013 Prepared for North Clackamas Park and Recreation District 150 Beavercreek Rd Oregon City, OR 97045 And The City of Milwaukie 10722 SE Main Street Milwaukie, OR 97222 Prepared by Guillozet Consulting LLC And NCPRD Natural Resources Program December 2013 Draft Spring Park Management Plan 2013 Table of Contents I. Spring Park Site Context .....................................................................................................................................1 II. Background .........................................................................................................................................................1 III. Geology and Soils ...........................................................................................................................................2 IV. Public Safety ...................................................................................................................................................2 V. Plant Communities and Management Units ......................................................................................................3 A. Alcove Unit .....................................................................................................................................................6 B. Wetland Shrub-Scrub Unit ..............................................................................................................................6