ATHENS and ROME: ‘A Tale of Two Cities’ Athens – 51-338 B.C

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ATHENS and ROME: ‘A Tale of Two Cities’ Athens – 51-338 B.C 1 2 ATHENS AND ROME: ‘A Tale of Two Cities’ Athens – 51-338 B.C. The Mediterranean Sea stands at the meeting point of three continents: In 510 B.C. Athens was not the capital of a united ‘Greece’ as it is today. Africa, Asia, and Europe. Since our species arrived at its shores over Greeks were scattered around the Mediterranean in settlements amongst 50,000 years ago, and floated primitive rafts onto its waters, this mighty foreign peoples in modern Turkey, Sicily, Italy, Africa, the Balkans, the sea has carried ideas, people, and goods from continent to continent; and Black Sea, France, Spain, Crete, Cyprus, and other Aegean islands – as well it has fostered the development – and collapse – of great civilisations. as modern Greece itself. And although they saw themselves (more or less) as one people, speaking one language, the hundreds of Greek communities Its name, reflecting this crucial position, means ‘Sea at the Middle of the around these shores were totally independent states (‘countries’). Athens Earth’ in Latin – the language of the city of Rome. The Romans, in fact, was just one of these ‘city states’ – so called because each was centred on a didn’t call it the ‘Mediterranean’, but ‘mare nostrum’: ‘our Sea’. Both our single city, with land and smaller settlements around it. name for the Mediterranean, and the Romans’, say something about our attitudes. Yet while people around the world might quibble that the Each Greek city state had its own traditions, its own heroes, its own local Mediterranean is the ‘centre of the earth’, there is no doubting its crucial versions of the multiple Greek gods – and its own means of government. role in world history; and two cities, Athens and Rome, in particular. Many states were ruled by individual kings or by collections of wealthy nobles. Sparta, the most powerful Greek city state, was dominated by rich In 2017 A.D. in Rome, the Pope still faces questions about his Church’s aristocratic families; a strange system in which two kings ruled at once; involvement in abuse scandals worldwide. Athens, now the capital of a and a completely militarised warrior class of citizens. Athens, until 510, united Greece, still struggles as one of the economically weakest members was ruled by dictators or ‘tyrants’, most lately Hippias. In 510, however, of the Eurozone. But two and a half millennia ago, in 511-507BC, events the Athenians, with help from Sparta, overthrew Hippias. The Spartans were transpiring in each of the two cities that would see them achieve a and their allies within Athens now wanted control, while others wanted to position of unrivalled importance in world history. This is why both cities form a ‘democracy’ - demokratia, a Greek word meaning ‘rule of the are still so intensively studied today. people’. In 508/7, the latter group won out, brushing the Spartans aside. The sea ‘at the centre of the The Spartans hoped that their intervention in 510 would win gratitude earth’: a reconstruction of a and compliance from a newly ‘free’ Athens – a hope many a ‘liberating’ Roman world map, with east at power has held in vain throughout history (as in some of the USA’s 20th the top. The three known st continents, Europe (left), Asia and 21 century experiences). In fact, they helped to create their greatest (top) and Africa (right), wrap rival, and a thorn in their side for the next hundred years and more. It was themselves around a central the new democracy of Athens, established in 508/7 B.C., that would rise to point: the Mediterranean. The spiky peninsulas of Italy and a position of dominance in Greece and the eastern Mediterranean; make Greece project into the sea from strides in art, thought and culture that still have a profound influence the left. today; and engage in direct and indirect jostling with Sparta, until they tore each other apart in the later fifth century BC. 3 4 THE PERSIAN WARS BEGIN – 492-480 BC – your Unit Two (Year 12!) But democratic Athens’ first great enemy was not Sparta, but Persia. The Persians were a tribal people from Iran who in the sixth century BC had expanded their power into the largest empire the world had ever seen. By TROY 510 BC, the Persian King of Kings ruled the whole of the Middle East, from G R E E C E Afghanistan to Egypt. He had also brought Asia Minor (modern Turkey) under his control, including many Greek city states on the western coast. 3. Xerxes’ invasion 480BC It must be remembered that at the time, this was most of the world as THERMOPYLAE 1. Ionian Revolt, 499-4BC known to either Greeks or Persians. Persia was a true superpower. P e r s I a n Attacking superpowers, or helping others to do so, can be a dangerous ATHENS E m p I r e move. The Taliban discovered this in 2001, and Athens did two and a half millennia ago. In the 490s BC, some Greek cities in Turkey rebelled against SPARTA the control of the Persians and appealed for help from Greeks abroad (the 2. Darius’ invasion, 490BC Ionian Revolt, 499-4BC: see map, 1). Sparta refused; Athens agreed. Athens and the rebel cities marched to the local Persian capital, Sardis (see map), and burned it. Imagine New York in September 2001; and the response. The rage of the world’s only superpower was terrifying. BATTLE SITES The rebellion was crushed, the Greek cities punished, and the Athenians TOWNs / City states retreated back to their own city across the sea. But they were far from Above: Greece in 510. Below: the Persian Empire. Greece is found in the far left hand corner of this vast area. safe. In 490, the Persian King Darius (Daryash in the original Persian), still raging at this tiny city’s barefaced cheek, launched an invasion, pouring P e r s I a n E m p I r e ships and men across the Aegean towards Greece (see map, 2). The 510 B.C. generals he sent to lead the invasion (he himself remained in Persia) landed their great force at Marathon, near Athens; but the Athenians, on their home soil, were able to defeat the invaders. (The slightly distorted legend of a lone runner dashing the 26 miles from Marathon to Athens gave the modern race its name and distance.) Against all the odds, Athens survived. But the Persians had unfinished business with what was for them an arrogant little foreign city over the sea. In 480, Darius’ son and successor Xerxes (Hsharyasha) launched his own invasion of Greece (see map, 3). This one was much more successful, and 5 6 his armies – ‘millions’ of troops, Greek historians tell us! – poured down the Greek peninsula, enlisting allies and destroying cities as they went. The southern Greek city-states, including Athens, allied together to fight the Persian menace. 300 Spartans, the greatest fighters of the Greek world, held the Persian multitude at the narrow pass of Thermopylae. For days on end they fought and died, one by one, before they were finally betrayed, encircled and destroyed. Their story does not need the CGI of the film ‘300’ to render it an astonishing tale of bravery and self-sacrifice. An inscription they left in the narrow pass read: ‘O go and tell the Spartans, passer-by, that here, obedient to their will, we lie.’ There was no-one left to carry that message in person. The Spartan blockade, broken though it was, may have saved Greece, by The pass at Thermopylae. The sea is just out of shot on the right; the sea and the cliffs allowed the Spartans giving their arch-rivals the Athenians time to decide on their own strategy. to maintain their defence, until the Persians were shown a secret mountaintop route to outflank them. In Athens, in the assembly of the people, where decisions were debated and voted on, there was panic. The god Apollo had spoken through his VICTORY AND ITS CONSEQUENCES – 480-431 BC oracle (holy prophet) at Delphi, telling the Athenians to Although the decision to abandon the city must have seemed horrific put their trust in wooden walls… when the destruction began, it proved the key to victory in the war against the Persians. The massive Persian fleet which had accompanied the …and for the deeply religious Athenians, this phrase formed the heart of invading army now entered the narrow waters around Athens, confident their debate. How were these words to be interpreted? Should they build of victory. But emerging from around the island of Salamis the Athenians wooden walls to defend themselves? Why of wood, not stone? Where and their allies, desperate and cornered, won the victory (nike) of their should they build them? Or could the oracle mean siege towers? lives. The Persians lost their fleet, and thousands of soldiers. At last, a noble named Themistokles persuaded his fellow citizens that the Xerxes, watching from his splendid throne on the Athenian mainland, ‘wooden walls’ mentioned by the god were the wooden hulls of ships, and sobbed in rage and disbelief. For him, the sight of his glorious, world- it was voted to abandon the city to the Persians’ rage. The entire city fled conquering troops and ships, foundering and drowning, must have been to the fleet and shortly after, the Persian horde descended on Athens. It impossible to accept; as the 1975 images of Americans, fleeing in panic was payback time for the looting of Sardis. Houses and temples were from the rooftops of the US embassy in South Vietnam, were to the USA.
Recommended publications
  • Ancient Greek Coins
    Ancient Greek Coins Notes for teachers • Dolphin shaped coins. Late 6th to 5th century BC. These coins were minted in Olbia on the Black Sea coast of Ukraine. From the 8th century BC Greek cities began establishing colonies around the coast of the Black Sea. The mixture of Greek and native currencies resulted in a curious variety of monetary forms including these bronze dolphin shaped items of currency. • Silver stater. Aegina c 485 – 480 BC This coin shows a turtle symbolising the naval strength of Aegina and a punch mark In Athens a stater was valued at a tetradrachm (4 drachms) • Silver staterAspendus c 380 BC This shows wrestlers on one side and part of a horse and star on the other. The inscription gives the name of a city in Pamphylian. • Small silver half drachm. Heracles wearing a lionskin is shown on the obverse and Zeus seated, holding eagle and sceptre on the reverse. • Silver tetradrachm. Athens 450 – 400 BC. This coin design was very poular and shows the goddess Athena in a helmet and has her sacred bird the Owl and an olive sprig on the reverse. Coin values The Greeks didn’t write a value on their coins. Value was determined by the material the coins were made of and by weight. A gold coin was worth more than a silver coin which was worth more than a bronze one. A heavy coin would buy more than a light one. 12 chalkoi = 1 Obol 6 obols = 1 drachm 100 drachma = 1 mina 60 minas = 1 talent An unskilled worker, like someone who unloaded boats or dug ditches in Athens, would be paid about two obols a day.
    [Show full text]
  • A Glimpse Into the Roman Finances of the Second Punic War Through
    Letter Geochemical Perspectives Letters the history of the western world. Carthage was a colony founded next to modern Tunis in the 8th century BC by Phoenician merchants. During the 3rd century BC its empire expanded westward into southern Spain and Sardinia, two major silver producers of the West Mediterranean. Meanwhile, Rome’s grip had tight- © 2016 European Association of Geochemistry ened over the central and southern Italian peninsula. The Punic Wars marked the beginning of Rome’s imperial expansion and ended the time of Carthage. A glimpse into the Roman finances The First Punic War (264 BC–241 BC), conducted by a network of alliances in Sicily, ended up with Rome prevailing over Carthage. A consequence of this of the Second Punic War conflict was the Mercenary War (240 BC–237 BC) between Carthage and its through silver isotopes unpaid mercenaries, which Rome helped to quell, again at great cost to Carthage. Hostilities between the two cities resumed in 219 BC when Hannibal seized the F. Albarède1,2*, J. Blichert-Toft1,2, M. Rivoal1, P. Telouk1 Spanish city of Saguntum, a Roman ally. At the outbreak of the Second Punic War, Hannibal crossed the Alps into the Po plain and inflicted devastating mili- tary defeats on the Roman legions in a quick sequence of major battles, the Trebia (December 218 BC), Lake Trasimene (June 217 BC), and Cannae (August 216 BC). As a measure of the extent of the disaster, it was claimed that more than 100,000 Abstract doi: 10.7185/geochemlet.1613 Roman soldiers and Italian allies lost their lives in these three battles, including The defeat of Hannibal’s armies at the culmination of the Second Punic War (218 BC–201 three consuls.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Practices in Ancient Macedonia from the Neolithic to the Roman Period
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by International Hellenic University: IHU Open Access Repository Agricultural practices in ancient Macedonia from the Neolithic to the Roman period Evangelos Kamanatzis SCHOOL OF HUMANITIES A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Arts (MA) in Black Sea and Eastern Mediterranean Studies January 2018 Thessaloniki – Greece Student Name: Evangelos Kamanatzis SID: 2201150001 Supervisor: Prof. Manolis Manoledakis I hereby declare that the work submitted is mine and that where I have made use of another’s work, I have attributed the source(s) according to the Regulations set in the Student’s Handbook. January 2018 Thessaloniki - Greece Abstract This dissertation was written as part of the MA in Black Sea and Eastern Mediterranean Studies at the International Hellenic University. The aim of this dissertation is to collect as much information as possible on agricultural practices in Macedonia from prehistory to Roman times and examine them within their social and cultural context. Chapter 1 will offer a general introduction to the aims and methodology of this thesis. This chapter will also provide information on the geography, climate and natural resources of ancient Macedonia from prehistoric times. We will them continue with a concise social and cultural history of Macedonia from prehistory to the Roman conquest. This is important in order to achieve a good understanding of all these social and cultural processes that are directly or indirectly related with the exploitation of land and agriculture in Macedonia through time. In chapter 2, we are going to look briefly into the origins of agriculture in Macedonia and then explore the most important types of agricultural products (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Problems in Athenian Democracy 510-480 BC Exiles
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 1971 Problems in Athenian Democracy 510-480 B. C. Exiles: A Case of Political Irrationality Peter Karavites Loyola University Chicago Recommended Citation Karavites, Peter, "Problems in Athenian Democracy 510-480 B. C. Exiles: A Case of Political Irrationality" (1971). Dissertations. Paper 1192. http://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/1192 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1971 Peter. Karavites PROBLEMS IN ATHENIAN DEMOCRACY 510-480 B.C. EXILES A Case of Political Irrationality A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty o! the Department of History of Loyola University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy b;y Peter Karavites ?ROBLEt'.n IN ATP.EHIA:rT n:s::ocRACY 5'10-480 n.c. EXIL:ffi: A case in Politioal Irrationality Peter·KARAVIT~ Ph.D. Loyola UniVGl'Sity, Chicago, 1971 This thesis is m attempt to ev"aluate the attitude of the Athenian demos during the tormative years of the Cleisthenian democracy. The dissertation tries to trace the events of the period from the mpul­ sion of Hippian to the ~ttle of Sal.amis. Ma.tural.ly no strict chronological sequence can be foll.amtd.. The events are known to us only f'ragmen~. some additional archaeological Wormation has trickled dcmn to us 1n the last tro decad.all 11h1ch shed light on the edating historical data prO\Tided ma:1nly by Herodotus md Arletotle.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Balkans Cradle of Aegean Culture
    ANTONIJE SHKOKLJEV SLAVE NIKOLOVSKI - KATIN PREHISTORY CENTRAL BALKANS CRADLE OF AEGEAN CULTURE Prehistory - Central Balkans Cradle of Aegean culture By Antonije Shkokljev Slave Nikolovski – Katin Translated from Macedonian to English and edited By Risto Stefov Prehistory - Central Balkans Cradle of Aegean culture Published by: Risto Stefov Publications [email protected] Toronto, Canada All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without written consent from the author, except for the inclusion of brief and documented quotations in a review. Copyright 2013 by Antonije Shkokljev, Slave Nikolovski – Katin & Risto Stefov e-book edition 2 Index Index........................................................................................................3 COMMON HISTORY AND FUTURE ..................................................5 I - GEOGRAPHICAL CONFIGURATION OF THE BALKANS.........8 II - ARCHAEOLOGICAL DISCOVERIES .........................................10 III - EPISTEMOLOGY OF THE PANNONIAN ONOMASTICS.......11 IV - DEVELOPMENT OF PALEOGRAPHY IN THE BALKANS....33 V – THRACE ........................................................................................37 VI – PREHISTORIC MACEDONIA....................................................41 VII - THESSALY - PREHISTORIC AEOLIA.....................................62 VIII – EPIRUS – PELASGIAN TESPROTIA......................................69
    [Show full text]
  • Accurately Simulating the Battle of Thermopylae to Analyze "What If " Scenarios Josh Wasserman Union College - Schenectady, NY
    Union College Union | Digital Works Honors Theses Student Work 6-2017 Accurately Simulating the Battle of Thermopylae to Analyze "What If " Scenarios Josh Wasserman Union College - Schenectady, NY Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses Part of the Classics Commons, and the Computer Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Wasserman, Josh, "Accurately Simulating the Battle of Thermopylae to Analyze "What If" Scenarios" (2017). Honors Theses. 99. https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses/99 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at Union | Digital Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Union | Digital Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Accurately Simulating the Battle of Thermopylae to Analyze “What-If” Scenarios By Joshua Wasserman ********* Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Honors in the Department of Computer Science UNION COLLEGE May, 2017 Abstract WASSERMAN, JOSHUA Accurately Simulating the Battle of Thermopylae to Analyze “What-If” Scenarios. Department of Computer Science, May, 2017. ADVISOR: Valerie Barr and Hans-Friedrich Mueller The Battle of Thermopylae (480 BCE) was a last ditch effort to stall the Persian army as it marched south toward Athens. Led by Leonidas and his personal guard of 300 Spartans, a citizen army of Greeks was able to delay a Persian army of over 100,000 soldiers at the town of Thermopylae for several days. Although the Greeks were ultimately defeated at Thermopylae, the battle provided enough time for the Greek states to regroup and plan a counter attack, eventually defeating the invading Persians.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan LINDA JANE PIPER 1967
    This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 66-15,122 PIPER, Linda Jane, 1935- A HISTORY OF SPARTA: 323-146 B.C. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1966 History, ancient University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan LINDA JANE PIPER 1967 All Rights Reserved A HISTORY OF SPARTA: 323-1^6 B.C. DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Linda Jane Piper, A.B., M.A. The Ohio State University 1966 Approved by Adviser Department of History PREFACE The history of Sparta from the death of Alexander in 323 B.C; to the destruction of Corinth in 1^6 B.C. is the history of social revolution and Sparta's second rise to military promi­ nence in the Peloponnesus; the history of kings and tyrants; the history of Sparta's struggle to remain autonomous in a period of amalgamation. It is also a period in Sparta's history too often neglected by historians both past and present. There is no monograph directly concerned with Hellenistic Sparta. For the most part, this period is briefly and only inci­ dentally covered in works dealing either with the whole history of ancient Sparta, or simply as a part of Hellenic or Hellenistic 1 2 history in toto. Both Pierre Roussel and Eug&ne Cavaignac, in their respective surveys of Spartan history, have written clear and concise chapters on the Hellenistic period. Because of the scope of their subject, however, they were forced to limit them­ selves to only the most important events and people of this time, and great gaps are left in between.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy, Topography and Landscape at Akragas' Valley of The
    Journal of Cultural Heritage 25 (2017) 1–9 Available online at ScienceDirect www.sciencedirect.com Original article Astronomy, topography and landscape at Akragas’ Valley of the Temples a b,∗ c Robert Hannah , Giulio Magli , Andrea Orlando a University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand b Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milan, Italy c Catania Astrophysical Observatory (OACT/INAF), Laboratori Nazionali del Sud (LNS/INFN), Institute of Sicilian Archaeoastronomy (IAS), Catania, Italy a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: The issue of the orientation of Greek Temples has been the subject of much debate since the end of the 19th Received 17 September 2016 century. In fact, although a general tendency to orientation within the arc of the rising sun is undeniable, Accepted 15 November 2016 specific patterns and the true meaning remain obscure. With the aim of shedding light on this problem we Available online 16 January 2017 present here a new, complete, high-precision survey of the temples of Akragas, the so-called Valley of the Temples UNESCO site. Our results include all temples – one of which was essentially still unpublished – Keywords: and show that very different reasons influenced the choices of orientation – some symbolic, but others Greek temples much more practical – beyond the general rule of orienting ‘to the rising sun’. In particular, the temples of Sicily the central terrace – including the world famous temple of Jupiter – were oriented in accordance with the Agrigento/Akragas town’s grid, while a rigorous orientation to the cardinal points is evidenced for the Aesculapius sanctuary.
    [Show full text]
  • Mark Scheme for June 2018
    GCE Ancient History Unit H007/01: Relations between Greek states and between Greek and non-Greek states, 492-404 BC Advanced Subsidiary GCE Mark Scheme for June 2018 Oxford Cambridge and RSA Examinations OCR (Oxford Cambridge and RSA) is a leading UK awarding body, providing a wide range of qualifications to meet the needs of candidates of all ages and abilities. OCR qualifications include AS/A Levels, Diplomas, GCSEs, Cambridge Nationals, Cambridge Technicals, Functional Skills, Key Skills, Entry Level qualifications, NVQs and vocational qualifications in areas such as IT, business, languages, teaching/training, administration and secretarial skills. It is also responsible for developing new specifications to meet national requirements and the needs of students and teachers. OCR is a not-for-profit organisation; any surplus made is invested back into the establishment to help towards the development of qualifications and support, which keep pace with the changing needs of today’s society. This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and students, to indicate the requirements of the examination. It shows the basis on which marks were awarded by examiners. It does not indicate the details of the discussions which took place at an examiners’ meeting before marking commenced. All examiners are instructed that alternative correct answers and unexpected approaches in candidates’ scripts must be given marks that fairly reflect the relevant knowledge and skills demonstrated. Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the published question papers and the report on the examination. © OCR 2018 H007/01 Mark Scheme June 2018 Annotations Annotation Meaning Blank Page Highlight Evaluation Knowledge and Understanding Omission Context Noted AO1 AO2 AO3 .
    [Show full text]
  • The Growth of Greek Cities in the First Millennium BC
    Princeton/Stanford Working Papers in Classics The growth of Greek cities in the first millennium BC Version 1.0 December 2005 Ian Morris Stanford University Abstract: In this paper I trace the growth of the largest Greek cities from perhaps 1,000- 2,000 people at the beginning of the first millennium BC to 400,000-500,000 at the millennium’s end. I examine two frameworks for understanding this growth: Roland Fletcher’s discussion of the interaction and communication limits to growth and Max Weber’s ideal types of cities’ economic functions. I argue that while political power was never the only engine of urban growth in classical antiquity, it was always the most important motor. The size of the largest Greek cities was a function of the population they controlled, mechanisms of tax and rent, and transportation technology. © Ian Morris. [email protected] 1 The growth of Greek cities in the first millennium BC Ian Morris (Stanford) 1. Introduction Greece in 1000 BC was a world of villages. Most people lived in communities of just a few dozen souls; even the largest settlement, Athens (Figure 1), was probably just 3,000 to 4,000 strong. But at the millennium’s end, the Greek east Mediterranean boasted some of the largest cities in pre-industrial history. Alexandria, Antioch, and Seleucia-on-the- Tigris probably each had 250,000-500,000 inhabitants. Figure 1. Sites in the Aegean mentioned in this chapter In this chapter I discuss the size of Greek cities and the implications of their growth. I identify three major transitions: 2 Figure 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Interventions by the Roman Republic in Illyria 230 – 167 BC
    Interventions by the Roman Republic in Illyria 230 – 167 BC Submitted by Jack James Willoughby, to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Classics, September 2018. This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. (Signature) ……………………………………………………………………………… Page 1 of 181 Abstract This thesis aims to determine how and why Rome undertook a series of interventions in Illyria during the period of 230 – 167 BC. The thesis is based on a detailed examination and consideration of the ancient written sources and the subsequent historiography on the subject. The Roman interventions in Illyria during this period have traditionally been treated as a component of wider studies of Roman expansion, although Rome’s involvement in Illyria has recently been examined by Dzino in his 2010 work Illyricum in Roman Politics 229BC-AD68. This work examined the development and integration of Illyricum in Roman political discourse, in which the Roman interventions were a smaller component in the broader study. A study of the Roman interventions in Illyria during the period of 230 – 167 BC has never previously been treated on this scale, nor effectively with a synthesis of the various approaches and pieces of evidence that are now available.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaic Greek Art (700–480 BC) the Seventh Century BC Saw The
    Archaic Greek Art (700–480 BC) The seventh century BC saw the beginning of the Archaic period of Greek art. Influenced by their Eastern neighbors, such as the Egyptians and the peoples of Anatolia (e.g., the Hittites and Lydians), the Greeks adopted new styles that soon replaced the spare, abstract geometric patterning that had been common since the fall of Mycenaean civilization. Greek colonization in Asia Minor on the Ionian Coast, as well as trading settlements established in places such as Egypt, brought Greeks into contact with these Eastern civilizations. The Greeks in the East brought styles and ideas back with them to mainland Greece, leading to a cultural synthesis and the formation of new and innovative styles. Combining these new themes and styles with their own tastes and techniques, the Greeks produced their own unique art. The Archaic period thus presents the beginning of the artistic forms that would characterize ancient Greek culture and civilization. Vase Painting Pottery was an important commodity in the ancient Greek world. Not only was it functional, but it also offered opportunities for artists to display their abilities. Finely painted pots were a valuable luxury item. Pots were produced in pieces. The main bowl section was produced with clay on a wheel. Then a neck and a base (called a foot) would be formed of clay and attached. The potter would fill in the joints with a slip, a more liquid form of clay, to seal them. Finally, handles could be attached to the pot. Then the pot would be fired in a kiln, which made the clay hard and durable.
    [Show full text]