An Update on Security, Migration, and U.S. Assistance November 2015
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Border Force Partner Bulletin
Partner Bulletin Essential information for Border Force’s partners May 2014 Message from Sir Charles Montgomery As Director General of Border Force I would like to welcome you to the May edition of Border Force Partner e-bulletin. I am committed to Border Force becoming the 'best in the world' and having effective partner engagement is very much at the heart of making this happen. This month Border Force experienced a challenging period in relation to problems at passport control. However this event also demonstrated the positive and essential role Border Force’s partners play in helping to secure our borders. Border Force staff and partners dealt with the situation effectively and professionally in a manner that was promoted positively and widely in media. I personally witnessed staff from both Border Force and partners working together and going the extra mile. I would again like to offer my sincere thanks to you and your staff for their support during this period. This month’s e-bulletin contains useful information about new ePassport technology being rolled out and the new security system that is being developed to keep our borders safe. You can also read more about how this month the Immigration Act received royal assent and how the Government launched a new Maritime Security Strategy. You can also find out more about our key partner meetings held this month, including the new Freight Sector Group and issues affecting the industry. The Partner Bulletin is now available on GOV.UK at Border Force/Publications. Please continue to give us your feedback by emailing the Border Force Partners inbox. -
Working with the UK Border Agency and Border Force
This document was archived on 31 March 2016 Working with the UK Border Agency and Border Force archived This document was archived on 31 March 2016 Working with the UK Border Agency and Border Force UKBA works with key partner organisations Important facts Background to address key threats to the UK. These are the threats from: Controlling migration On 1 March 2012 Border Force was split from UKBA to become a separate law • terrorists; The Home Office is responsible for controlling enforcement command, led by its own migration to the UK, through the work of Border Force, Director General, and accountable directly to • criminals enabling illegal immigration which applies immigration and customs controls on Ministers. through fraud, forgery or other passengers arriving at the border, and of the UK Border organised attempts to cheat the Agency (UKBA). UKBA UKBA will protect the border and ensure that immigration system; Britain remains open for business, checking • processes visa applications overseas and people travelling to the UK before they arrive • organised illegal immigration to the applications for further stay from those already through visa checks, intelligence and the use UK; and, in the country, including students, workers, of the e-Borders system. family members and asylum seekers; • a crisis in another country that could At an operational level, Border Force ports lead to false or unfounded claims for • processes citizenship applications; and have local arrangements with the police, in asylum alongside legitimate refugee particular Special Branch, and, in Northern claims. • takes enforcement action against those found Ireland, the C3 Ports Policing Branch, for to be in the UK unlawfully. -
Stopped at Uk Airport for Warrant
Stopped At Uk Airport For Warrant Bartolomei panegyrizing incontrollably? If sooth or unrelieved Ajai usually hyperbolizes his chukker seethe spatially or withstand scornfully and profusely, how carangid is Gay? Cymose Doyle never springs so mucking or overpitch any Guarneri transversally. If you are not a citizen, border agents can refuse your entry to the US. GNR arrest two persons for theft after car chase. TSA woman told me she had to feel my bra area. Any case results presented on the site are based upon the facts of a particular case and do not represent a promise or guarantee. How many people leaving britain are stopped at uk airport for warrant was also extended a global entry form coming through passport flagging please enter your state is it is kept strictly confidential information is? Some have it was stopped at uk airport for warrant. Safe use of Internet and Social Media for the Young. HMM, then how did they get passed to get Global Entry? What is defined as a mask? Lucky strike unless allowed back i should have provided for at uk airport? What if i feel great result of a uk including a foot of sentence or redistributed without a walgreens, those who do a stop a better about putting real news was stopped at uk? SOR after I stand trial. You will be playing a lottery as it will be down to the countries discretion to let you in or not. UK, either before arrest on the extradition matter or at any point prior to extradition. On the first on any pending charges were withdrawn, on the second one I received the results I was hoping for and on the third one the results far exceeded any expectations I had and the charges were withdrawn. -
Smart Border Management an Indian Perspective September 2016
Content Smart border management p4 / Responding to border management challenges p7 / Challenges p18 / Way forward: Smart border management p22 / Case studies p30 Smart border management An Indian perspective September 2016 www.pwc.in Foreword India’s geostrategic location, its relatively sound economic position vis-à-vis its neighbours and its liberal democratic credentials have induced the government to undertake proper management of Indian borders, which is vital to national security. In Central and South Asia, smart border management has a critical role to play. When combined with liberal trade regimes and business-friendly environments, HIğFLHQWFXVWRPVDQGERUGHUFRQWUROVFDQVLJQLğFDQWO\LPSURYHSURVSHFWVIRUWUDGH and economic growth. India shares 15,106.7 km of its boundary with seven nations—Pakistan, China, Nepal, Bhutan, Myanmar, Bangladesh and Afghanistan. These land borders run through different terrains; managing a diverse land border is a complex task but YHU\VLJQLğFDQWIURPWKHYLHZRIQDWLRQDOVHFXULW\,QDGGLWLRQ,QGLDKDVDFRDVWDO boundary of 7,516.6 km, which includes 5,422.6 km of coastline in the mainland and 2,094 km of coastline bordering islands. The coastline touches 9 states and 2 union territories. The traditional approach to border management, i.e. focussing only on border security, has become inadequate. India needs to not only ensure seamlessness in the legitimate movement of people and goods across its borders but also undertake UHIRUPVWRFXUELOOHJDOĠRZ,QFUHDVHGELODWHUDODQGPXOWLODWHUDOFRRSHUDWLRQFRXSOHG with the adoption of -
Floods from Hurricane Stan; Appeal No
CENTRAL AMERICA, MEXICO AND HAITI: FLOODS FROM 23 December 2005 HURRICANE STAN The Federation’s mission is to improve the lives of vulnerable people by mobilizing the power of humanity. It is the world’s largest humanitarian organization and its millions of volunteers are active in over 181 countries. In Brief Appeal No. 05EA021; Operations Update no. 03; Period covered: 17 October to 23 December, 2005; Appeal coverage: 79.2%. Click here to go directly to the attached Contributions List, also available on the website). Appeal history: • Launched on 7 October 2005 CHF 1,568,000 (USD 1,230,694 OR EUR 1,012,648) for 6 months to assist 10,250 families (51,250 beneficiaries). • A revised Emergency Appeal was issued on 17 October 2005, seeking CHF 6,175,760 (USD 4,780,996 or EUR 3,974,564) in cash, kind, or services to assist 10,050 families (50,250 beneficiaries) for 6 months. • Disaster Relief Emergency Funds (DREF) allocated: CHF 280,000 Outstanding needs: CHF 1,285,365 (USD 979,736 or EUR 825,457) Related Emergency or Annual Appeals: El Salvador: Floods and Volcanic Activity (Appeal 05EA020); Haiti: Floods (Appeal 22/2004); Bahamas, Cuba and Mexico: Hurricane Wilma (Appeal 05EA024); Central America: Annual Appeal (Appeal 05AA043); Pan American Disaster Response Unit: Annual Appeal (Appeal 05AA040) Operational Summary: Since the onset of the disaster, Costa Rican, Guatemalan, Honduran, Mexican, Nicaraguan and Haitian Red Cross Societies have been working untiringly to respond to the needs of the most affected families. Although many families have now been able to return to their homes, many of those affected remain in shelters or are staying in the homes of friends or relatives. -
Corredor Transístmico De Tehuantepec Como Alternativa Al Canal De Panamá”
UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DEL ESTADO DE MÉXICO UNIDAD ACADÉMICA PROFESIONAL CUAUTITLÁN IZCALLI “CORREDOR TRANSÍSTMICO DE TEHUANTEPEC COMO ALTERNATIVA AL CANAL DE PANAMÁ”. TESINA QUE PARA OBTENER EL TÍTULO DE LICENCIADO EN NEGOCIOS INTERNACIONALES PRESENTA: AMAURI VIEIRA OROZCO ASESOR: LIC. EN R. I. MARY CRUZ GÓMEZ CORTES CUAUTITLÁN IZCALLI, ESTADO DE MÉXICO. DICIEMBRE DE 2018 RESUMEN. Desde la época de la Conquista en el siglo XVI, el Istmo de Tehuantepec pasó a ser una zona de interés para los españoles debido a su posición geográfica y su estrechez, sin embargo, se dieron por mejores opciones Panamá y Nicaragua, más adelante en el siglo XIX Estados Unidos de Norteamérica puso su atención en la región del Istmo, ambicionando lo mismo que los españoles y que después de la guerra contra México quiso aprovechar como moneda de cambio para que existiese la paz, en contraste ese convenio que detallaba el libre tránsito americano nunca tuvo ratificación en su senado y por ende falta de validez, años más tarde aparecieron personajes que reclamaban tener la posesión de la región como José Garay un ex funcionario mexicano que tenía la concesión para poder construir el tan anhelado paso interoceánico, sin embargo por el poco presupuesto mexicano para desarrollarlo decide ofrecerlo a compañías americanas, que se darían a conocer en 1907 cuando Porfirio Díaz desarrolla las vías ferrocarrileras e inaugura el paso por el Istmo de Tehuantepec. Ya en el siglo XXI México ha decidió retomar un proyecto que ha tenido distintos nombres, necesaria es la infraestructura ya que representa progreso y desarrollo no sin antes conocer la región Istmeña y sus características, sociales, culturales y económicas, así como lo que la implementación de las Zonas Económicas Especiales representa para su evolución. -
Q6romena Newsletter-July-Sep2018
ROMENA Newsletter Quarterly Newsletter from the Regional Office for the Middle East and North Africa July/September 2018 Countering Human Trafficking: a core task for the In my many years with UNODC, I have met human trafficking United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) survivors who were able to overcome their trauma and turn to action against human trafficking, advocating, seeking justice and Message by Ms. Cristina Albertin, UNODC Regional providing shelter and support to victims and survivors. Representative for the Middle East and North Africa On 5 October 2018, Nadia Murad, a young Yezidi woman from In the last years, human trafficking Iraq, who survived sexual slavery, was awarded the Nobel Peace and smuggling of migrants have Prize for her unwavering work seeking justice for survivors of attained public attention without human trafficking and sexual violence perpetrated against her precedent given the emotional people. As the UNODC Goodwill Ambassador for the dignity of images of drowning migrants and the Survivors of Human Trafficking, she is a shining light of hope refugees, appalling news on slave for survivors of sexual violence and human trafficking, and an markets and heart-breaking icon reminding us of our collective obligation to deliver justice to testimonies from people identifying victims of human trafficking and sexual violence. their smugglers or traffickers on the As UNODC Regional Representative for North Africa journey or at arrival points. With the and the Middle East, I am proud of our partnership with many entry into force in 2003 of the United countries in the Region which are committed to end human Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime trafficking and smuggling of migrants and with the countries and (UNTOC) and its supplementary protocols on Trafficking in Persons organizations that provide funding for this work, such as (TiP) and Smuggling of Migrants (SoM) State parties count with a Belgium, EU, GIZ, Italy and the US. -
Eliminating Labor Trafficking from All Companies in Washington State
From International Supply Chains to Local Consumption: Eliminating Labor Trafficking from all Companies in Washington State Presented by the Jackson School of International Studies University of Washington Task Force 2015 1 Instructors: Dr. Sutapa Basu & Ms. Bratati Ghosh Executive Committee: Ana Alice Block - Lead Coordinator Emma Vielbig - Assistant Coordinator/Lead Poster Amela Zukic - Editor Helena Koval - Editor Researchers Zara Pollack Sydney Victor Irene Situ Margaret Montgomery Westley Rachko Kate Burns Akhmed Shukurov Mengwei Cindy Zhang Lissan Tibebe Alison Forsyth Rocío Nureña Sarah Priddy 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ................................................................................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................................................. 10 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 11 CHAPTER 1: WASHINGTON STATE UNDER THE MICROSCOPE: UNDERSTANDING HUMAN AND LABOR TRAFFICKING THROUGH HISTORY, GLOBALIZATION, AND ECONOMICS ...... 15 SECTION 1: HISTORICALLY ANALYZING AND DEFINING HUMAN AND LABOR TRAFFICKING ..................... 16 SECTION 2: SCALE OF ISSUE: GLOBALIZATION, INEQUALITY, AND DEMAND & SUPPLY NEXUS -
Redalyc.LA RIBERA MEXICANA DEL RÍO SUCHIATE, TERRITORIO
Revista Pueblos y Fronteras Digital ISSN: 1870-4115 [email protected] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México México Gómora Alarcón, Jonathan LA RIBERA MEXICANA DEL RÍO SUCHIATE, TERRITORIO FRONTERIZO EN EXTINCIÓN. Conflictos generados por la abundancia del recurso hídrico Revista Pueblos y Fronteras Digital, vol. 9, núm. 17, junio-noviembre, 2014, pp. 59-77 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Distrito Federal, México Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=90630737005 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto LA RIBERA MEXICANA DEL RÍO SUCHIATE, TERRITORIO FRONTERIZO EN EXTINCIÓN Conflictos generados por la abundancia del recurso hídrico Jonathan Gómora Alarcón [email protected] CIESAS-Sureste RESUMEN En la frontera entre México, Guatemala y Belice hay más de seis ríos que atraviesan el límite del territorio del país guatemalteco y se vierten en el mexicano y en el beliceño. Pero sólo tres son los conocidos propiamente como ríos fronterizos. Dos pertenecen a la división de México y Guatemala: el Suchiate y el Usumacinta, y el tercero, Río Hondo, corre entre México y Belice. La desaparición paulatina de la ribera suchiatense, erosionada por los fenómenos meteo- rológicos, entre otros eventos, ha sido motivo de preocupación local, mas no internacional. Con base en el trabajo de campo realizado en la parte baja de la cuenca transfronteriza de dicha ribera, se presenta la situación actual de los ejidos y los problemas con que se enfrentan por los trabajos hidráulicos realizados para la contención y el encauzamiento del río, que no toman en cuenta la participación social de los actores locales. -
General Assembly Distr.: General 1 July 2016
United Nations A/71/119 General Assembly Distr.: General 1 July 2016 Original: English Seventy-first session Item 105 of the preliminary list* Crime prevention and criminal justice Improving the coordination of efforts against trafficking in persons Report of the Secretary-General Summary The present report has been prepared pursuant to General Assembly resolutions 64/293 and 70/179. It summarizes the efforts of Member States and the entities of the United Nations system towards implementing Assembly resolution 70/179, entitled “Improving the coordination of efforts against trafficking in persons”. It includes information on the status of ratifications or accessions to the Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, as well as on efforts made by all stakeholders to further enhance the implementation of the United Nations Global Plan of Action to Combat Trafficking in Persons, adopted by the General Assembly in its resolution 64/293. The report further provides an update on the status and work of the United Nations Voluntary Trust Fund for Victims of Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children; information on the Global Report on Trafficking in Persons issued by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime in 2014 and the report to be launched in 2016; the work of the Inter-Agency Coordination Group against Trafficking in Persons; and information on awareness-raising campaigns, in particular, the designated World Day against Trafficking in Persons. __________________ * A/71/50. V.16-03998 (E) 220716 250716 *1603998* A/71/119 Contents Page I. -
World Bank Document
37472 MEDIUM-SIZED PROJECT PROPOSAL REQUEST FOR GEF FUNDING FINANCING PLAN (US$) AGENCY’S PROJECT ID: GM-P098732 GEF PROJECT/COMPONENT GEFSEC PROJECT ID: 2896 Project 949,981 Public Disclosure Authorized COUNTRY: Mexico PDF A approved Sep 26, 50,000 2005 PROJECT TITLE: Sacred Orchids of Chiapas: Cultural and SUB-TOTAL GEF 999,981 Religious Values in Conservation GEF AGENCY: World Bank CO-FINANCING (project implementation only, PDF and preparation counterparts no DURATION: 3 years for project implementation included). GEF FOCAL AREA(S): Biodiversity Federal Government 325,769 GEF OPERATIONAL PROGRAM(S): OP4 Mountain Ecosystems; OP3 Forest Ecosystems Municipal Governments 80,000 NGOs Pronatura Chiapas 227,308 GEF STRATEGIC PRIORITIES: Biodiversity Strategic TNC 173,452 Priority I. Catalyzing Sustainability of Protected Areas ARC 120,000 Systems: (a) Demonstration and implementation of Other 176,832 innovative financial mechanisms and (c) Catalyzing Sub-Total Co-financing: 1,103,361 Public Disclosure Authorized community–indigenous initiatives. Biodiversity Strategic Priority II. Mainstreaming Biodiversity in Production Total Project Financing: 2,103,342 Landscapes and Sectors: (b) Developing market incentive FINANCING FOR ASSOCIATED ACTIVITY: measures Pronatura Chiapas Environmental Enterprises Fund (500,000 USD) will ESTIMATED STARTING DATE: January 2007 facilitate access to small credits if IMPLEMENTING AGENCY FEE: needed. CONTRIBUTION TO KEY INDICATORS OF THE BUSINESS PLAN: The project will contribute to strengthening the subregional Protected Areas (PA) system by establishing partnerships with landowners to secure a more effective long-term conservation of 286,486 hectares (167,309 hectares in La Sepultura Biosphere Reserve and 119,177 hectares in El Triunfo B.R.) included in the global priority lists: the Central America Pine-Oak Forest Ecoregion, the Sierra Madre del Sur Pine-Oak Forest Ecoregion and the Public Disclosure Authorized Chiapas Central Depression Dry Forest. -
Mexico and the GEF
Mexico and the GEF Mexico is one of the world's 12 megadiverse countries, with more than 10 percent of the biological diversity of the planet1. A combination of mountainous terrain and the country’s location in the neo-arctic and neo-tropical transition zone contributes to Mexico's high alpha, beta and gamma biodiversity. Mexico is particularly rich in the number of species present in the country2. Mexico is also considered to be one of the countries with the highest ecological diversity in the hemisphere3. The GEF portfolio in Mexico includes 54 national projects for more than $450 million –23 projects in biodiversity, 19 in climate change, six multifocal, four in chemicals and two in international waters. Mexico has also been part of 30 regional and global projects representing more than $196 million –10 projects in biodiversity, seven in climate change, five multifocal, six in international waters and two in chemicals. Regarding the GEF Small Grants Programme (SGP), Mexico, as an upgraded country, has received more than $13 million for over 577 CSOs and community-based projects since its start in 1994. Considering the globally relevant biodiversity and Mayan cultural identity in the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico was the first SGP to be implemented regionally. In 1999, the scope was expanded to the Pantanos de Centla Biosphere Reserve and the Coastal Plain of Tabasco. In 2006, project finance was extended to Chiapas and since 2012 the Programme operates in the Yucatan Peninsula, Tabasco state and 9 micro-regions in the Chiapas state. CSO Experiences in Mexico The active engagement of CSOs in actions to protect the global environment has contributed to the national portfolio in Mexico, which includes numerous projects implemented by and in partnership with CSOs.