UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
1 Quillen's 6 Page Paper
Quillen’s work on formal group laws and complex cobordism theory Conference honoring the legacy of Daniel Quillen October 6-8, 2012 Doug Ravenel University of Rochester 1.1 The six author paper 1.2 1 Quillen’s 6 page paper Quillen’s cryptic and insightful masterpiece: Six pages that rocked our world 1.3 Six pages that rocked our world (continued) Table of contents 1 1. Formal group laws. 2. The formal group law of complex cobordism. 3. The universal nature of cobordism group laws. 4. Typical group laws (after Cartier). ∗ 5. Decomposition of W(p). (The p-local splitting of W = MU.) ∗ 6. Operations in WT . (The structure of BP∗(BP).) 1.4 1.1 Enter the formal group law Six pages that rocked our world (continued) Quillen begins by defining formal group laws just as we define them today. Definition. A formal group law over a ring R is a power series F(X;Y) 2 R[[X;Y]] with F(X;0) = F(0;X) = X F(Y;X) = F(X;Y) F(X;F(Y;Z)) = F(F(X;Y);Z): Examples: • X +Y, the additive formal group law. • X +Y + XY, the multiplicative formal group law. • Euler’s addition formula for a certain elliptic integral, p p X 1 −Y 4 +Y 1 − X4 2 Z[1=2][[X;Y]]: 1 − X2Y 2 1.5 Six pages that rocked our world (continued) He then defines the formal group law of complex cobordism in terms of the first Chern class of the tensor product of two complex line bundles, just as we define it today. -
Quillen's Work on Formal Group Laws and Complex Cobordism Theory
Quillen’s work on formal group laws and complex cobordism theory Doug Ravenel Quillen’s work on Quillen’s 6 page paper Enter the formal group law formal group laws Show it is universal The Brown-Peterson and complex theorem p-typicality cobordism theory Operations in BP-theory Complex cobordism theory after Quillen Conference Morava’s work honoring the legacy Chromatic homotopy theory Elliptic cohomology and of Daniel Quillen topological modular forms October 6-8, 2012 Conclusion Doug Ravenel University of Rochester 1.1 Quillen’s work on The six author paper formal group laws and complex cobordism theory Doug Ravenel Quillen’s 6 page paper Enter the formal group law Show it is universal The Brown-Peterson theorem p-typicality Operations in BP-theory Complex cobordism theory after Quillen Morava’s work Chromatic homotopy theory Elliptic cohomology and topological modular forms Conclusion 1.2 Quillen’s work on Quillen’s cryptic and insightful masterpiece: formal group laws and complex Six pages that rocked our world cobordism theory Doug Ravenel Quillen’s 6 page paper Enter the formal group law Show it is universal The Brown-Peterson theorem p-typicality Operations in BP-theory Complex cobordism theory after Quillen Morava’s work Chromatic homotopy theory Elliptic cohomology and topological modular forms Conclusion 1.3 Table of contents 1. Formal group laws. 2. The formal group law of complex cobordism. 3. The universal nature of cobordism group laws. 4. Typical group laws (after Cartier). ∗ 5. Decomposition of Ω(p). (The p-local splitting -
Beardsley-Dissertation-2016
Coalgebraic Structure and Intermediate Hopf-Galois Extensions of Thom Spectra in Quasicategories by Jonathan Beardsley A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland March 22, 2016 ⃝c Jonathan Beardsley All Rights Reserved Abstract We extend Lurie's work on derived algebraic geometry to define highly structured En-coalgebras, bialgebras and comodules in the homotopy theorist's category of spectra. We then show that rep- resentable comonads give examples of coalgebras in categories of module spectra for En-rings. This immediately leads to an identification of spectral (and more generally quasicategorical) descent data with certain quasicategories of comodules. Using this new framework we then extend the work of Rognes and Hess to define Hopf-Galois extensions of En-ring spectra. We use this machinery to produce many new examples of intermediate Hopf-Galois extensions. Such structures, unlike the intermediate extensions of Galois covers, are not generally controlled by a Galois correspondence. We do however show that intermediate Hopf-Galois extensions are ubiquitous among Thom spectra. Of particular interest are a number of classical cobordism spectra, e.g. MU and MSpin, that can now be described as quotients of other cobordism spectra, e.g. MU is the quotient of an action of S1 on MSU, and MSpin is the quotient of action of K(Z; 3) on MString. Producing such intermediate extensions is accomplished by recognizing the Thom spectrum of a morphism of Kan complexes f : X ! BGL1(R) as a quotient of R by an action ΩX ! GL1(R). -
Arxiv:1905.06698V2 [Math.AT] 6 Dec 2019 Prtr Tsatisfies It Operator
Submitted exclusively to the London Mathematical Society doi:10.1112/0000/000000 The circle action on topological Hochschild homology of complex cobordism and the Brown–Peterson spectrum John Rognes Abstract ′ We specify exterior generators in π∗THH(MU)= π∗(MU) ⊗ E(λn | n ≥ 1) and π∗THH(BP )= π∗(BP ) ⊗ E(λn | n ≥ 1), and calculate the action of the σ-operator on these graded rings. ′ In particular, σ(λn)=0 and σ(λn) = 0, while the actions on π∗(MU) and π∗(BP ) are expressed in terms of the right units ηR in the Hopf algebroids (π∗(MU),π∗(MU ∧ MU)) and (π∗(BP ),π∗(BP ∧ BP )), respectively. 1. Introduction Let S be the sphere spectrum. For any (associative) S-algebra R, the topological Hoch- schild homology spectrum THH(R) is the geometric realization of a cyclic spectrum [q] 7→ ∧q THH(R)q = R ∧ R , see [9] and [19]. The skeleton filtration of THH(R) leads to a spectral sequence 1 Eq,∗ = πq+∗(skqTHH(R), skq−1THH(R)) =⇒ πq+∗THH(R) , whose (E1, d1)-term is the normalized chain complex associated to the simplicial graded abelian group ∧q [q] 7→ π∗THH(R)q = π∗(R ∧ R ) . The cyclic structure specifies a natural circle action on THH(R), which we shall treat as 1 1 1 a right action. The cofiber sequence 1+ → S+ → S is split by a retraction S+ → 1+ and a 1 1 1 1 stable section S → S+. We write σ for the composite map THH(R) ∧ S → THH(R) ∧ S+ → THH(R) and call the induced homomorphism σ : π∗THH(R) → π∗+1THH(R) the (right) σ- 2 operator.