DOCSLIB.ORG

FINAL TMDL Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FINAL TMDL Report FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration, Bureau of Watershed Restoration NORTHWEST DISTRICT • PERDIDO RIVER AND BAY BASIN FINAL TMDL Report Fecal Coliform TMDL for Brushy Creek (WBID 4) Kyeongsik Rhew, Ph.D. August 2012 FINAL TMDL Report: Perdido River and Bay Basin, Brushy Creek (WBID 4), Fecal Coliform, August 2012 Acknowledgments This Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) analysis could not have been accomplished without significant contributions from staff in the Florida Department of Environmental Protection’s (Department) Northwest District Office, Watershed Assessment Section, and Watershed Evaluation and TMDL Section. Map production assistance was provided by the Watershed Data Services Section within the Department’s Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration. Editorial assistance was provided by Jan Mandrup-Poulsen and Linda Lord. For additional information on the watershed management approach and impaired waters in the Perdido Bay Basin, contact: Charles Gauthier Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Watershed Restoration Watershed Planning and Coordination Section 2600 Blair Stone Road, Mail Station 3565 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400 Email: [email protected] Phone: (850) 245–8555 Fax: (850) 245–8434 Access to all data used in the development of this report can be obtained by contacting: Kyeongsik Rhew Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Watershed Restoration Watershed Evaluation and TMDL Section 2600 Blair Stone Road, Mail Station 3555 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400 Email: [email protected] Phone: (850) 245–8461 Fax: (850) 245–8444 ii Florida Department of Environmental Protection FINAL TMDL Report: Perdido River and Bay Basin, Brushy Creek (WBID 4), Fecal Coliform, August 2012 Contents Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION ___________________________________ 1 1.1 Purpose of Report _____________________________________________ 1 1.2 Identification of Waterbody ______________________________________ 1 1.3 Background ___________________________________________________ 1 Chapter 2: DESCRIPTION OF WATER QUALITY PROBLEM ________ 4 2.1 Statutory Requirements and Rulemaking History ____________________ 4 2.2 Information on Verified Impairment _______________________________ 4 2.3 Period of Record Trend _________________________________________ 5 Chapter 3. DESCRIPTION OF APPLICABLE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS AND TARGETS __________________________________ 7 3.1 Classification of the Waterbody and Criterion Applicable to the TMDL ________________________________________________________ 7 3.2 Applicable Water Quality Standards and Numeric Water Quality Target ________________________________________________________ 7 Chapter 4: ASSESSMENT OF SOURCES ________________________ 8 4.1 Types of Sources ______________________________________________ 8 4.2 Potential Sources of Fecal Coliform within the Brushy Creek WBID Boundary _____________________________________________________ 8 4.2.1 Point Sources ___________________________________________ 8 Wastewater Point Sources ____________________________________________ 8 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Permittees ______________________ 8 4.2.2 Land Uses and Nonpoint Sources ___________________________ 8 Land Uses __________________________________________________________ 9 Wildlife and Sediments _______________________________________________ 9 Chapter 5: DETERMINATION OF ASSIMILATIVE CAPACITY _______ 12 5.1 Determination of Loading Capacity ______________________________ 12 5.1.1 Data Used in the Determination of the TMDL _________________ 12 Temporal Patterns __________________________________________________ 14 Spatial Patterns ____________________________________________________ 17 5.1.2 Critical Condition ________________________________________ 19 5.1.3 TMDL Development Process ______________________________ 22 Chapter 6: DETERMINATION OF THE TMDL ____________________ 26 6.1 Expression and Allocation of the TMDL ___________________________ 26 6.2 Load Allocation _______________________________________________ 27 6.3 Wasteload Allocation __________________________________________ 27 iii Florida Department of Environmental Protection FINAL TMDL Report: Perdido River and Bay Basin, Brushy Creek (WBID 4), Fecal Coliform, August 2012 6.3.1 NPDES Wastewater Discharges ____________________________ 27 6.3.2 NPDES Stormwater Discharges ____________________________ 27 6.4 Margin of Safety ______________________________________________ 27 Chapter 7: TMDL IMPLEMENTATION __________________________ 28 7.1 Basin Management Action Plan _________________________________ 28 7.2 Other TMDL Implementation Tools _______________________________ 29 References ________________________________________________ 30 Appendices _______________________________________________ 32 Appendix A: Background Information on Federal and State Stormwater Programs _________________________________________ 32 Appendix B: Estimates of Fecal Coliform Loadings from Potential Sources _____________________________________________________ 33 Agriculture __________________________________________________ 33 Pets ________________________________________________________ 33 Septic Tanks ________________________________________________ 34 Wildlife _____________________________________________________ 38 List of Tables Table 2.1. Summary of Fecal Coliform Monitoring Data for Brushy Creek During the Cycle 1 Verified Period (January 1, 1999– June 30, 2006) and Cycle 2 Verified Period (January 1, 2004– June 30, 2011) ____________________________________________ 5 Table 2.2. Summary of Fecal Coliform Monitoring Data for Brushy Creek During the Cycle 2 Verified Period (January 1, 2004– June 30, 2011) ____________________________________________ 5 Table 4.1. Classification of Land Use Categories within the Brushy Creek WBID Boundary ____________________________________ 10 Table 5.1a. Summary Statistics of Fecal Coliform Data for All Stations in Brushy Creek by Month During the Cycle 2 Verified Period (January 1, 2004–June 30, 2011) ____________________________ 15 Table 5.1b. Summary Statistics of Fecal Coliform Data for All Stations in Brushy Creek by Season During the Cycle 2 Verified Period (January 1, 2004–June 30, 2011) ____________________________ 16 Table 5.2. Station Summary Statistics of Fecal Coliform Data for Brushy Creek During the Cycle 2 Verified Period (January 1, 2004–June 30, 2011) ______________________________________ 18 Table 5.3. Summary of Fecal Coliform Data for Brushy Creek by Hydrologic Condition During the Cycle 2 Verified Period (January 1, 2004–June 30, 2011) ____________________________ 20 iv Florida Department of Environmental Protection FINAL TMDL Report: Perdido River and Bay Basin, Brushy Creek (WBID 4), Fecal Coliform, August 2012 Table 5.4. Calculation of Fecal Coliform Reductions for the Brushy Creek TMDL Based on the Hazen Method ____________________ 23 Table 6.1. TMDL Components for Fecal Coliform in Brushy Creek _________ 27 Table B.1. Estimated Agricultural Loading in the Brushy Creek Watershed ______________________________________________ 33 Table B.2. Estimated Number of Households and Dogs, Waste Produced (grams/day) by Dogs Left on the Land Surface, and Total Load of Fecal Coliform (counts/day) Produced by Dogs within the Brushy Creek WBID Boundary ________________ 34 Table B.3. Dog Population Density, Wasteload, and Fecal Coliform Density Based on the Literature (Weiskel et al. 1996) ___________ 34 Table B.4. Estimated Number of Households Using Septic Tanks and Estimated Septic Tank Loading within the Brushy Creek WBID Boundary _________________________________________ 36 Table B.5. Estimated Number of Septic Tanks and Septic Tank Failure Rates for Escambia County, 2003–10 ________________________ 38 List of Figures Figure 1.1. Location of the Brushy Creek (WBID 4) Watershed in the Perdido River and Bay Basin and Major Geopolitical and Hydrologic Features in the Area _____________________________ 2 Figure 1.2. Detailed View of the Brushy Creek (WBID 4) Watershed and Major Geopolitical and Hydrologic Features in the Area _________ 3 Figure 2.1. Fecal Coliform Concentration Trends in Brushy Creek for the Period of Record (1966–2011) ____________________________ 6 Figure 4.1. Principal Land Uses within the Brushy Creek WBID Boundary in 2009–10 _____________________________________ 11 Figure 5.1. Location of Water Quality Stations in Brushy Creek ____________ 13 Figure 5.2. Trends in Fecal Coliform Concentrations in Brushy Creek During the Cycle 2 Verified Period (January 1, 2004–June 30, 2011) __________________________________________________ 14 Figure 5.3a. Fecal Coliform Exceedances and Rainfall at All Stations in Brushy Creek by Month During the Cycle 2 Verified Period (January 1, 2004–June 30, 2011) ____________________________ 16 Figure 5.3b. Fecal Coliform Exceedances and Rainfall at All Stations in Brushy Creek by Season During the Cycle 2 Verified Period (January 1, 2004–June 30, 2011) ____________________________ 17 Figure 5.4. Spatial Fecal Coliform Concentration Trends in Brushy Creek by Station During the Cycle 2 Verified Period (January 1, 2004–June 30, 2011) ____________________________________ 18 v Florida Department of Environmental Protection FINAL TMDL Report: Perdido River and Bay Basin, Brushy Creek (WBID 4), Fecal Coliform, August 2012 Figure 5.5. Fecal Coliform Data for Brushy Creek by Hydrologic Condition During the Cycle 2 Verified Period (January 1,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • St. Marks River Watershed
    St. Marks River Watershed Surface Water Improvement and Management Plan Update Northwest Florida Water Management District August 2009 Program Development Series 2009–02 St. Marks River Watershed Surface Water Improvement and Management Plan Update Developed by the Northwest Florida Water Management District under the auspices of the Surface Water Improvement and Management (SWIM) Program and in cooperation with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Program Development Series 2009-2 August 2009 GOVERNING BOARD George Roberts, Chair Panama City Philip McMillan, Vice Chair Blountstown Steve Ghazvini, Secretary/Treasurer Tallahassee Stephanie Bloyd Peter Antonacci Jerry Pate Panama City Beach Tallahassee Pensacola Tim Norris Joyce Estes Ralph Rish Santa Rosa Beach Eastpoint Port St. Joe Douglas E. Barr — Executive Director ABOUT THE NORTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT The Northwest Florida Water Management District is one of five water management districts in Florida, created by the Water Resources Act of 1972 (Chapter 373, Florida Statutes) to address regional water resource issues while furthering statewide goals and policies. The District stretches from the St. Marks River Basin in Jefferson County to the Perdido River in Escambia County, covering approximately 11,305 square miles, or 17 percent of the state’s geographic area. There are 63 incorporated cities within the District. It is bordered on the north by Georgia and Alabama, on the west by Alabama, on the south by the Gulf of Mexico, and on the east by the Suwannee River Water Management District, which shares Jefferson County with the District. The District has worked for decades to protect and manage water resources in a sustainable manner for the continued welfare of people and natural systems across its 16-county region.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 335-6-11 Water Use Classifications for Interstate and Intrastate Waters
    Environmental Management Chapter 335-6-11 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER DIVISION - WATER QUALITY PROGRAM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 335-6-11 WATER USE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR INTERSTATE AND INTRASTATE WATERS TABLE OF CONTENTS 335-6-11-.01 The Use Classification System 335-6-11-.02 Use Classifications 335-6-11-.01 The Use Classification System. (1) Use classifications utilized by the State of Alabama are as follows: Outstanding Alabama Water ................... OAW Public Water Supply ......................... PWS Swimming and Other Whole Body Shellfish Harvesting ........................ SH Fish and Wildlife ........................... F&W Limited Warmwater Fishery ................... LWF Agricultural and Industrial Water Supply ................................ A&I (2) Use classifications apply water quality criteria adopted for particular uses based on existing utilization, uses reasonably expected in the future, and those uses not now possible because of correctable pollution but which could be made if the effects of pollution were controlled or eliminated. Of necessity, the assignment of use classifications must take into consideration the physical capability of waters to meet certain uses. (3) Those use classifications presently included in the standards are reviewed informally by the Department's staff as the need arises, and the entire standards package, to include the use classifications, receives a formal review at least once every three years. Efforts currently underway through local 201 planning projects will provide additional technical data on certain waterbodies in the State, information on treatment alternatives, and applicability of various management techniques, which, when available, will hopefully lead to new decisions regarding use classifications. Of particular interest are those segments which are currently classified for any usage which has an associated Supp.
    [Show full text]
  • Nutrient Reduction and Water Quality Restoration Types Draft Restoration Plan 1/Environmental Assessment
    Deepwater Horizon Natural Resource Damage Assessment and Restoration Deepwater Horizon Natural Resource Damage Assessment and Restoration Florida Restoration Area Nutrient Reduction and Water Quality Restoration Types Draft Restoration Plan 1/Environmental Assessment Project Index NR1 - Pensacola Bay and Perdido River Watersheds - Nutrient Reduction NR3 - Lower Suwannee River Watershed - Nutrient Reduction WQ1 - Carpenter Creek Headwaters Water Quality Improvements WQ2 - Pensacola Beach Reclaimed Water System Expansion WQ3 - Rattlesnake Bluff Road and Riverbank Restoration WQ4 - Pensacola Bay Unpaved Roads Initiative (P&D) WQ5 - Alligator Lake Coastal Dune Lake Hydrologic Restoration WQ8 - City of Port St. Joe Stormwater Improvements WQ10 - City of Carrabelle’s Lighthouse Estates: Septic Tank Abatement - Phase II WQ11 - Lower Suwannee National Wildlife Refuge Hydrologic Restoration (P&D) WQ12 - Lower Charlotte Harbor Flatwoods Hydrologic Restoration Initiative, Yucca Pens Unit (P&D) This factsheet highlights the Florida Trustee The FL TIG evaluated 15 restoration projects Implementation Group’s (FL TIG) tentative consistent with the Nutrient Reduction and Water preferred restoration projects consistent with the Quality Restoration Types, and as shown on this Nutrient Reduction and Water Quality Restoration factsheet, identified 11 tentative preferred projects Types. within these Restoration Types, totaling an estimated cost of $22,195,754. Florida Restoration Area October 2018 Florida Restoration Area Nutrient Reduction and Water Quality Projects Proposed for Implementation in Draft Restoration Plan 1 PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST NUTRIENT REDUCTION Pensacola Bay and This project would improve water quality by reducing sediment $2,100,000 Perdido River and nutrient (phosphorus and nitrogen) loads to Pensacola Bay Watersheds - Nutrient and Perdido River watersheds in two HUC12 watersheds: Sandy Reduction Hollow-Pine Barren Creek and Moore Creek through the development and implementation of conservation plans on agricultural lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Perdido River and Bay Surface Water Improvement and Management Plan
    Perdido River and Bay Surface Water Improvement and Management Plan November 2017 Program Development Series 17-07 Northwest Florida Water Management District Perdido River and Bay Surface Water Improvement and Management Plan November 2017 Program Development Series 17-07 NORTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT GOVERNING BOARD George Roberts Jerry Pate John Alter Chair, Panama City Vice Chair, Pensacola Secretary-Treasurer, Malone Gus Andrews Jon Costello Marc Dunbar DeFuniak Springs Tallahassee Tallahassee Ted Everett Nick Patronis Bo Spring Chipley Panama City Beach Port St. Joe Brett J. Cyphers Executive Director Headquarters 81 Water Management Drive Havana, Florida 32333-4712 (850) 539-5999 Crestview Econfina Milton 180 E. Redstone Avenue 6418 E. Highway 20 5453 Davisson Road Crestview, Florida 32539 Youngstown, FL 32466 Milton, FL 32583 (850) 683-5044 (850) 722-9919 (850) 626-3101 Perdido River and Bay SWIM Plan Northwest Florida Water Management District Acknowledgements This document was developed by the Northwest Florida Water Management District under the auspices of the Surface Water Improvement and Management (SWIM) Program and in accordance with sections 373.451-459, Florida Statutes. The plan update was prepared under the supervision and oversight of Brett Cyphers, Executive Director and Carlos Herd, Director, Division of Resource Management. Funding support was provided by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation’s Gulf Environmental Benefit Fund. The assistance and support of the NFWF is gratefully acknowledged. The authors would like to especially recognize members of the public, as well as agency reviewers and staff from the District and from the Ecology and Environment, Inc., team that contributed to the development of this plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Floods in Florida Magnitude and Frequency
    UNITED STATES EPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR- ., / GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FLOODS IN FLORIDA MAGNITUDE AND FREQUENCY By R.W. Pride Prepared in cooperation with Florida State Road Department Open-file report 1958 MAR 2 CONTENTS Page Introduction. ........................................... 1 Acknowledgements ....................................... 1 Description of the area ..................................... 1 Topography ......................................... 2 Coastal Lowlands ..................................... 2 Central Highlands ..................................... 2 Tallahassee Hills ..................................... 2 Marianna Lowlands .................................... 2 Western Highlands. .................................... 3 Drainage basins ....................................... 3 St. Marys River. ......_.............................. 3 St. Johns River ...................................... 3 Lake Okeechobee and the everglades. ............................ 3 Peace River ....................................... 3 Withlacoochee River. ................................... 3 Suwannee River ...................................... 3 Ochlockonee River. .................................... 5 Apalachicola River .................................... 5 Choctawhatchee, Yellow, Blackwater, Escambia, and Perdido Rivers. ............. 5 Climate. .......................................... 5 Flood records ......................................... 6 Method of flood-frequency analysis ................................. 9 Flood frequency at a gaging
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Perdido Sub-Estuary Report
    2014 Perdido Sub-Estuary Report Field Operations Division Mobile Office Environmental Assessment Section Water Unit August 2020 Coastal Waters Monitoring Program 2014 Perdido Sub-Estuary Report Alabama Department of Environmental Management Environmental Assessment Section Water Unit August 2020 2014 CWMP: Perdido Sub-Estuary Report 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ 3 LIST OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................. 4 LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ 5 LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................... 6 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 7 METHODS ..................................................................................................................................... 9 RESULTS ..................................................................................................................................... 15 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................. 68 APPENDIX ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Paleo Perspective of Alabama and Florida (USA) Interstate Streamflow
    water Article A Paleo Perspective of Alabama and Florida (USA) Interstate Streamflow Melanie Vines 1 , Glenn Tootle 1, Leigh Terry 1 , Emily Elliott 2, Joni Corbin 1, Grant L. Harley 3 , Jonghun Kam 4 , Sahar Sadeghi 1 and Matthew Therrell 2,* 1 Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA; [email protected] (M.V.); [email protected] (G.T.); [email protected] (L.T.); [email protected] (J.C.); [email protected] (S.S.) 2 Department of Geography, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA; [email protected] 3 Department of Geography and Geological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA; [email protected] 4 Division of Environmental Science and Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang 37673, Korea; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Seasonal reconstructions of streamflow are valuable because they provide water planners, policy makers, and stakeholders with information on the range and variability of water resources before the observational period. In this study, we used streamflow data from five gages near the Alabama-Florida border and centuries-long tree-ring chronologies to create and analyze seasonal flow reconstructions. Prescreening methods included correlation and temporal stability analysis of predictors to ensure practical and reliable reconstructions. Seasonal correlation analysis revealed that several regional tree-ring chronologies were significantly correlated (p ≤ 0.05) with March–October streamflow, and stepwise linear regression was used to create the reconstructions. Reconstruc- tions spanned 1203–1985, 1652–1983, 1725–1993, 1867–2011, and 1238–1985 for the Choctawhatchee, Conecuh, Escambia, Perdido, and Pascagoula Rivers, respectively, all of which were statistically skill- Citation: Vines, M.; Tootle, G.; Terry, ful (R2 ≥ 0.50).
    [Show full text]
  • Nonpoint Source Screening Assessment of Southeast Alabama River Basins -- 1999 Volume I Chattahoochee and Chipola Basins
    Nonpoint Source Screening Assessment of Southeast Alabama River Basins -- 1999 Volume I Chattahoochee and Chipola Basins Report Date: May 1, 2002 Aquatic Assessment Unit Montgomery Branch - Field Operations Division Alabama Department of Environmental Management NONPOINT SOURCE SCREENING ASSESSMENT OF SOUTHEAST ALABAMA RIVER BASINS – 1999 VOLUME I CHATTAHOOCHEE AND CHIPOLA BASINS REPORT DATE: MAY 1, 2002 AQUATIC ASSESSMENT UNIT ) FIELD OPERATIONS DIVISION ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT THIS PROJECT WAS FUNDED OR PARTIALLY FUNDED BY THE ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT USING A CLEAN WATER ACT §319(H) NONPOINT SOURCE DEMONSTRATION GRANT PROVIDED BY THE U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY - REGION 4. Address comments or questions to: AQUATIC ASSESSMENT UNIT MONTGOMERY BRANCH - FIELD OPERATIONS DIVISION ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT P.O. 301463 MONTGOMERY, AL 36130-1463 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background: In 1996, the Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) adopted a basinwide approach to nonpoint source monitoring and management using a repeating 5-year management cycle. Because of the 5-year rotation, basins are placed into groups so that all basins receive equal focus. Concentrating planning and implementation efforts within one basin group allows a focused review of available data and provides coordinated water quality monitoring and assessment efforts, efficient implementation of control activities on a geographic basis, and consistent and integrated decision-making for awarding CWA §319 funds. During 1999, the Aquatic Assessment Unit (AAU) of the Field Operations Division completed basinwide screening assessments of the Southeast Alabama River basins. This document provides an overview of the basinwide screening assessment conducted in the Chattahoochee and Chipola Basins. Land use information and assessment data available from each of the 30 sub-watersheds in the Chattahoochee and Chipola basins are summarized.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2020–5032
    U.S. Department of the Interior Prepared in cooperation with the Scientific Investigations Report 2020–5032 U.S. Geological Survey ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Plate 1 88° # 87° 86° # 85° 03587200 Horse Creek # #03571800 02384900 Elk River 03566200 # # TENNESSEE #03574700 Second Creek 03588500 # Flint River Candies Creek 35° Chambers Creek 35° Cypress Creek # Crow Creek # Beaverdam Creek0357479650 LAUDERDALE 03572110 Sugar Creek Coahulla Creek # Tennessee MADISON 03575000 02384540 03590000 # # Mud Creek 03567200 LIMESTONE Chickamauga# Creek # River 03576250Indian Creek 03589500 # 03575100 # JACKSON COLBERT Spring Creek Creek 02429980 03592500 #03586500 Holly Piney Creek Piney Big Brown02429900 Creek # # 03574500 # Rock Creek # 02397830 Twentymile 03575500 # Chattooga River 03592200 # 02430000 # Town Creek Big Nance Creek Pine Log Creek # 03577110 Kirby Creek 03592300 Cedar Creek # 02398000 # East Armuchee Creek Town Creek Big Wills Creek # Creek Waterway Bear Creek 02399000 # Flint Creek 03576500 03572900 # Oostanaula River LAWRENCE # 02388200 Mud Creek FRANKLIN # Little River 02432900 MORGAN MARSHALL DEKALB 02434000 # 03573000 # # # #02399200 # # 02450250 Tombigbee River Gum Creek 03591800 Clear Creek Slab Creek 02398300 Boguegaba Creek Tennessee-Tombigbee Two Run Creek 02437800 # CULLMAN TerrapinCHEROKEE Creek Duck River MARION Ryan Creek Town Creek 02433000 # WINSTON 02450825 02401000 02436500 # 02438000 # # 02397500 # 02400100# # Cedar Creek 02450000 ETOWAH Coosa River # # 02455000 # Hills Creek 34° 02401470 02400000 34° New
    [Show full text]
  • State Boundaries CONSTITUTION of the STATE of FLORIDA – Article II, Section 1 State Boundaries AS REVISED in 1968 and SUBSEQUENTLY AMENDED
    State Boundaries CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA – Article II, Section 1 State Boundaries AS REVISED IN 1968 AND SUBSEQUENTLY AMENDED ARTICLE II GENERAL PROVISIONS SECTION 1. State boundaries. (a) The state boundaries are: Begin at the mouth of the Perdido River, which for the purposes of this description is defined as the point where latitude 30°16'53" north and longitude 87°31'06" west intersect; thence to the point where latitude 30°17'02" north and longitude 87°31'06" west intersect; thence to the point where latitude 30°18'00" north and longitude 87°27'08" west intersect; thence to the point where the center line of the Intracoastal Canal (as the same existed on June 12, 1953) and longitude 87°27'00" west intersect; the same being in the middle of the Perdido River; thence up the middle of the Perdido River to the point where it intersects the south boundary of the State of Alabama, being also the point of intersection of the middle of the Perdido River with latitude 31°00'00" north; thence east, along the south boundary line of the State of Alabama, the same being latitude 31°00'00" north to the middle of the Chattahoochee River; thence down the middle of said river to its confluence with the Flint River; thence in a straight line to the head of the St. Marys River; thence down the middle of said river to the Atlantic Ocean; thence due east to the edge of the Gulf Stream or a distance of three geographic miles whichever is the greater distance; thence in a southerly direction along the edge of the Gulf Stream or along a line
    [Show full text]
  • Northwest Florida Water Management District Consolidated Annual Report Fiscal Year 2018-2019 Publication Number: AR-19
    FRANKLIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REGULAR MEETING COURTHOUSE ANNEX – COMMISSION MEETING ROOM MARCH 6, 2019 9:00 AM AGENDA The Board of County Commissioners asks that all cell phones are turned off or placed on silent (vibrate) mode. Any handouts (information) for distribution to the Commission must be submitted to the Board Secretary (Clerk’s Office) or to the County Coordinator on or before the Thursday prior to that Tuesday’s meeting. Failure to do so will result in your removal from the agenda or a delay of any action relating to your request until a future meeting. 9:00 AM Call to Order Prayer and Pledge Approval of Minutes Payment of County Bills 9:05 AM Public Comments – (This is an opportunity for the public to comment on agenda or non-agenda items. When you are recognized to be heard by the Chairman, please sign the speaker’s log and adhere to the time limit. An individual will be allowed to speak for three minutes whereas a designated representative of a group or faction will be allowed to speak for five minutes.) 9:15 AM Constitutional Officers Mrs. Heather Riley – Supervisor of Election – Special Elections Discussion Mrs. Rhonda Skipper – Property Appraiser – Preliminary Tax Roll Discussion Mr. Rick Watson – Tax Collector – USDA Broadband Grant 9:30 AM Department Directors Report Howard Nabors – Superintendent of Public Works Fonda Davis – Solid Waste Director Pam Brownell – Emergency Management Director Erik Lovestrand – Extension Office Director 9:45 AM John Solomon – TDC Administrator – Report 10:00 AM RFQ/Sealed Proposal Openings RFQ for RESTORE Act Grant Consultant Sealed Proposal for Renovations to the UF/IFAS Extension ANERR Office 10:15 AM Tim Centers – Community Action Agency – Update Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Johns River Basin, Florida
    ST. JOHNS RIVER BASIN, FLORIDA INTERIM WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN FINDINGS Special Publication SJ 86-SP2 US Army Corps of Engineers Jacksonville District Special Publication SJ 86-SP2 ST. JOHNS RIVER BASIN, FLORIDA INTERIM WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN FINDINGS SYLLABUS This special report was prepared in response to Public Law 98-50 which pro- vided funds for this investigation and directed the Corps of Engineers to prepare an interim water quality management plan for the St. Johns River Basin. The St. Johns River Basin study area encompasses an approximately 9,200 square mile drainage area within all or parts of 15 counties that comprise most of the east-central and northeastern parts of Florida. The Upper Basin River Valley originates at an approximate elevation of 25 feet above mean sea level and extends some 113 miles northward to river mile point 191 where surface water elevations fluctuate about mean sea level. The downstream 191 miles of the river have been divided for this study into the Middle Basin to river mile point 101 and the Lower Basin to the Atlantic Ocean. Tidal influences extend southward and upstream through much of the Middle Basin, gradually becoming imperceptible. As a result, the St. Johns River upstream of its mouth and into the Middle Basin exists as a shallow, very wide water- way with estuarine characteristics. The findings of the study are: 1. Technical information is lacking on water quality improvement and environmental enhancement needs and these needs can be more effectively determined upon completion of the needed water quality evaluations described in this report; 2.
    [Show full text]