Hydropower and Sustainable Development: a Journey

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hydropower and Sustainable Development: a Journey Hydropower and Sustainable Development: A Journey Article submitted to the World Energy Congress, 15 February 2010 Hydropower and Sustainable Development: A Journey Article submitted to the World Energy Congress 2010 International Hydropower Association Kristin Schumann, Lau Saili, Richard Taylor, Refaat Abdel‐Malek 1. Introduction Hydropower accounts for 16% of all global electricity production (2007, EIA 2010) and it is one of the world’s most widely used renewable, low-carbon energy resources. It plays an important role in enabling communities around the world to meet their power and water needs. In some regions the pace of hydropower growth has been rapid but with little guidance to ensure development is sustainable. However, some of the most promising and influential initiatives to improve development, such as the Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Protocol, have been driven by the hydropower sector itself. This paper addresses the progress that hydropower has made in the context of sustainable development over the past 15 years. Firstly, it will define what sustainability means in the hydropower context. Secondly, the application of sustainable hydropower development in practice will be examined. Finally, prominent initiatives that the sector has and is making to increase the sustainability performance of hydropower will be outlined. 2. Sustainable Development Background "The concept of sustainable development does imply limits, not absolute limits but limitations imposed by the present state of technology and social organizations on environmental resources and by the ability of the biosphere to absorb the effects of human activities. But technology and social organization can both be managed and improved to make way for a new era of economic growth." (WCED 1987, 8) The concept of living in harmony with nature is as old as humankind. However, a modern conception emerged in the term ‘sustainable development’ with the rise of green movements in the late 1960s and early 1970s. It was a key theme of the United Nations (UN) Conference on the Human Environment in Stockholm in 1972, which gave rise to the Stockholm Declaration. The Declaration proclaimed that it was possible to achieve economic growth in an equitable way while avoiding or minimizing negative impacts on the environment. The concept was developed over following years culminating in the 1987 UN report Our Common Future (WCED 1987), which established the almost universally used definition of sustainable development as “Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” (WCED 1987, 8). This definition captured the spirit of the times whereby government, business, and civil society have strived to make development sustainable. This movement was capped by the 1992 Rio Declaration of the UN Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro and reaffirmed in the Johannesburg Declaration of the World Summit on Sustainable Development in 2002. The concept of sustainable development has developed from being depicted by as three concentric circles, through three pillars supporting a roof, to three integrated circles (Figure 1 Hydropower and Sustainable Development: A Journey Article submitted to the World Energy Congress, 15 February 2010 1). Initially, social and economic development was seen to be constrained by the environment. This concept developed towards a concept where economic, environmental, and social dimensions where all pillars of the same house and needed equal attention. The most current concept is that a dynamic interplay between the social, economic, and environmental dimensions of human activity needs to maintain a healthy environment, promote and invest in sustainable livelihoods, and foster economic growth. This balance is best shown by three integrated circles, which imply that none of the sustainability dimensions can be promoted without establishing trade-offs with the two others. Sustainable development Economy Social Economy Society Protection Growth Progress Environment Environment Social Economic Environmental A. Three Concentric Circles B. Three Pillars of Sustainability C. Three Integrated Circles Figure 1: Three Visual Representations of Sustainability The three dimensions of sustainability and how they should be balanced are the subject of much debate across academic and professional disciplines, and the public and private sectors. This reflects that sustainability has been an ‘essentially contested concept’ (Gaillie 1956), normative in nature and reflective of the acceptability of a particular development activity in the context of a particular society in a given place and time. Indeed, sustainable development is often criticised as a nebulous ‘catch-all’ which means all things to all people. Within the debate, two broad schools of thought are evident, sometimes referred to as ‘weak’ and ‘strong’ sustainability (Beckerman 1995, Neumayer 2003). The strong sustainability approach is radical in that it calls for bottom-lines in the social and environmental dimensions, since trade-offs may be the result of power asymmetry between negotiating/affected parties or the inability of an ecosystem to negotiate for itself. Following this approach entails that the pursuit of development must not lead to irreversible impacts on the environment: resources should not be depleted and ecosystems should not be altered. The alternative sustainability approach is based on collaboration and sensible compromise and considers that trade-offs between the three dimensions of sustainability are necessary in order to achieve sustainable development. Advocates assert that socio-economic development, particularly priorities such as poverty eradication, cannot be realised without modification of ecosystems. This second, cooperative approach therefore recognizes the necessity of trade-offs if development is to be achieved. However, it does not in itsself provide applicable sustainability indicators or a practical guidance for policy makers and the private sector when making decisions on investment and infrastructure development. 2 Hydropower and Sustainable Development: A Journey Article submitted to the World Energy Congress, 15 February 2010 In the policy arena the issue of sustainability has an interplay between the top-down and bottom-up policy dynamic. Top-down sees policy-makers legislating or regulating to oblige decision-makers and planners to comply with sustainability criteria. In the bottom-up dynamic, private actors start making business more sustainable without a hard regulatory environment in place (usually motivated by a healthy dose of risk aversion). In both dynamics, civil society has an important role to play as an ‘honest broker’ and educator of public policy makers and private sector decision-makers; it is the knowledge and awareness-raising which civil society actors bring to the table that helps change the way policy and business is done. It is against this historical and conceptual backdrop that ardent criticisms of hydropower increased in the 1990s; from civil society at national levels into regional and international domains. From reaction to pro-action the sector has developed sustainability tools, engaging in dialogue across sectors and stakeholders. This long journey has been to define what sustainability should mean in a hydropower context at the international level and how this should be practically applied and measured in the field. 3. Sustainable Development Dimensions of Hydropower “Diversify energy supply by developing advanced, cleaner, more efficient, affordable and cost- effective energy technologies, including fossil fuel technologies and renewable energy technologies, hydro included, and their transfer to developing countries on concessional terms as mutually agreed.” (WSSD 2002b, 19e) The World Summit on Sustainable Development in 2002 stipulated in of its Plan of Implementation that hydropower should be included in the drive to increase the contribution of renewable energy throughout the world. Hydropower technology itself does not impede the ability of future generations to meet their needs, however, sustainable development and the way hydropower has sometimes been developed have not always been in harmony; different development goals must combine and historical practices must change with new knowledge. Hydropower has been developed in its modern form over the past hundred years principally to provide cheap electricity for national economic development and safeguard a country’s energy security. In recent times this has been further supplemented by climate change mitigation and adaptation targets. Since 2000, however, the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) have shifted the goal of hydropower to eradicating poverty, changing unsustainable patterns of consumption and production, protecting and managing the natural resource base, and sustainably developing the world’s least developed countries. Any debate on hydropower sustainability needs to consider its many faces and effects. Projects can be run-of-river, include storage reservoirs or recycle water between reservoirs in the form of pumped storage. Projects can be in densely populated areas requiring resettlement, or be remote from any settlement. A dam can fragment a river where fish is plentiful and require conservation measures or a dam may impact a river of marginal biodiversity. Dams and reservoirs can be located in different climate zones, which will have different impacts on water
Recommended publications
  • (Hydropower) Technology in South African Narrow-Reef Hard-Rock Mines
    The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy Platinum 2012 P. Fraser THE USE OF HIGH-PRESSURE, WATER-HYDRAULIC (HYDROPOWER) TECHNOLOGY IN SOUTH AFRICAN NARROW-REEF HARD-ROCK MINES P. Fraser Hydro Power Equipment (Pty) Ltd Abstract This paper examines the new water-hydraulic (hydropowered) drill rigs that have been developed and proven in the last decade primarily in tabular, shallow-dipping, narrow-reef hard-rock South African mines. These include drill rigs for flat-end tunnel development, narrow inclined raises and winzes, large inclines and declines and longhole-based developments such as ore passes and vent raises. The hydropower technology rigs offer advantages both in safety and performance over traditional compressed-air-powered, hand-held development, and are generally more cost-effective than imported oil electro-hydraulic drill rigs. Furthermore, hydropowered rigs are inherently energy-efficient. The benefits of hydropower are discussed and a ‘comprehensive development model’ is presented which demonstrates that ore-bodies can be accessed in significantly shorter times. ‘Localized’ half level hydropower systems are introduced and a range of ancillary equipment available is listed. Introduction According to Neville Nicolau, CEO of Anglo Platinum, ’Safety is our moral licence to operate’ and, ’if we don’t get our safety right, then you must expect society to take away our licence to operate, and then we would be responsible for closing mines and destroying work 1. While the long-term trend in the Fatal Injury Frequency Rate (FIFR) is downward, fatalities are not acceptable to any of the stakeholders in the mining industry or investor community. Safety is therefore a non-negotiable imperative.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contribution of Hydropower Reservoirs to Flood Control in the Austrian Alps
    Ilydrology in Mountainous Regions. II - Artificial Reservoirs; Water and Slopes (Proceedings of two Lausanne Symposia, August 1990). IAHS Publ. no. 194,1990. The contribution of hydropower reservoirs to flood control in the Austrian Alps W. PIRCHER Tiroler Wasserkraftwerke Aktiengesellschaft (TIWAG) Landhausplatz 2, A-6o2o Innsbruck, Austria ABSTRACT A considerable improvement to flood control is a significant - and free - additional utility accruing to the general public from the construction of hydropower storage reservoirs. By way of illustration, the author presents a comparative study on the basis of a number of flood events in valleys influenced by storage power plants. INTRODUCTION Austria has approximately thirty major storage reservoirs built by hy­ dropower companies and operated on a seasonal basis. Since they tend to be located at high altitudes, total stored energy from a combined active storage of 1.3oo hm^ is over 3.5oo GWh for winter and peak power generation, and this forms the backbone of electricity generation in Austria. Taking into account also the smaller reservoirs for daily and weekly storage, approximately 31% of the country's present annual total hydroelectric generation of 34.ooo GWh is controlled by reservoir sto­ rage, with the high degree of control and flexibility this offers. The primary goal in the construction of all storage power schemes in Austria, and the only source of subsequent earnings for the hydro- power companies, is of course electricity generation, but such schemes also involve a whole series of additional utilities that accrue to the general public free of charge. As a rule, significant improvements in flood control are the most important of these spin-offs, although be­ nefits to the local infrastructure and tourism as well as a markable increase of flow during the winter period are not to be underestimated, either.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydroelectric Power -- What Is It? It=S a Form of Energy … a Renewable Resource
    INTRODUCTION Hydroelectric Power -- what is it? It=s a form of energy … a renewable resource. Hydropower provides about 96 percent of the renewable energy in the United States. Other renewable resources include geothermal, wave power, tidal power, wind power, and solar power. Hydroelectric powerplants do not use up resources to create electricity nor do they pollute the air, land, or water, as other powerplants may. Hydroelectric power has played an important part in the development of this Nation's electric power industry. Both small and large hydroelectric power developments were instrumental in the early expansion of the electric power industry. Hydroelectric power comes from flowing water … winter and spring runoff from mountain streams and clear lakes. Water, when it is falling by the force of gravity, can be used to turn turbines and generators that produce electricity. Hydroelectric power is important to our Nation. Growing populations and modern technologies require vast amounts of electricity for creating, building, and expanding. In the 1920's, hydroelectric plants supplied as much as 40 percent of the electric energy produced. Although the amount of energy produced by this means has steadily increased, the amount produced by other types of powerplants has increased at a faster rate and hydroelectric power presently supplies about 10 percent of the electrical generating capacity of the United States. Hydropower is an essential contributor in the national power grid because of its ability to respond quickly to rapidly varying loads or system disturbances, which base load plants with steam systems powered by combustion or nuclear processes cannot accommodate. Reclamation=s 58 powerplants throughout the Western United States produce an average of 42 billion kWh (kilowatt-hours) per year, enough to meet the residential needs of more than 14 million people.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study in the Dudh Koshi Basin of Nepal
    water Article Hydropower Potential of Run of River Schemes in the Himalayas under Climate Change: A Case Study in the Dudh Koshi Basin of Nepal Daniele Bocchiola 1,2,* , Mattia Manara 1 and Riccardo Mereu 3 1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (DICA), Politecnico di Milano, L. da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy; [email protected] 2 EVK2CNR Committee of Italy, S. Bernardino 145, 24122 Bergamo, Italy 3 Department of Energy Engineering (DENG), Politecnico di Milano, Campus-Bovisa, Lambruschini, 4a, 20156 Milano, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 20 July 2020; Accepted: 16 September 2020; Published: 19 September 2020 Abstract: In spite of the very large hydropower potential given from the melting snow and ice of Himalayas, Nepal’s population has little hydropower production. The high use of fossil fuels and biomasses results in measurable air pollution, even in the mountain areas. Hydropower planning and implementation, in the face of the changing climate, is therefore paramount important. We focus here on Nepal, and particularly on the Dudh Koshi river basin, with a population of ca. 170,000 people, within an area with large potential for hydropower production. Our main objectives are to (i) preliminarily design a local hydropower grid based on a distributed run of river ROR scheme, and (ii) verify the resilience of the grid against modified hydrology under perspective climate change, until the end of the century. To do so, we set up and tune the Poli-Hydro semi-distributed glacio-hydrological model, mimicking the complex hydrology of the area. We then modify a state of the art algorithm to develop and exploit a heuristic, resource-demand based model, called Poli-ROR.
    [Show full text]
  • Underground Pumped-Storage Hydropower (UPSH) at the Martelange Mine (Belgium): Underground Reservoir Hydraulics
    energies Article Underground Pumped-Storage Hydropower (UPSH) at the Martelange Mine (Belgium): Underground Reservoir Hydraulics Vasileios Kitsikoudis 1,*, Pierre Archambeau 1 , Benjamin Dewals 1, Estanislao Pujades 2, Philippe Orban 3, Alain Dassargues 3 , Michel Pirotton 1 and Sebastien Erpicum 1 1 Hydraulics in Environmental and Civil Engineering, Urban and Environmental Engineering Research Unit, Liege University, 4000 Liege, Belgium; [email protected] (P.A.); [email protected] (B.D.); [email protected] (M.P.); [email protected] (S.E.) 2 Department of Computational Hydrosystems, UFZ—Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Permoserstr. 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany; [email protected] 3 Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, Urban and Environmental Engineering Research Unit, Liege University, 4000 Liege, Belgium; [email protected] (P.O.); [email protected] (A.D.) * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +32-478-112388 Received: 22 April 2020; Accepted: 6 July 2020; Published: 8 July 2020 Abstract: The intermittent nature of most renewable energy sources requires their coupling with an energy storage system, with pumped storage hydropower (PSH) being one popular option. However, PSH cannot always be constructed due to topographic, environmental, and societal constraints, among others. Underground pumped storage hydropower (UPSH) has recently gained popularity as a viable alternative and may utilize abandoned mines for the construction of the lower reservoir in the underground. Such underground mines may have complex geometries and the injection/pumping of large volumes of water with high discharge could lead to uneven water level distribution over the underground reservoir subparts. This can temporarily influence the head difference between the upper and lower reservoirs of the UPSH, thus affecting the efficiency of the plant or inducing structural stability problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydropower Technologies Program — Harnessing America’S Abundant Natural Resources for Clean Power Generation
    U.S. Department of Energy — Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Wind & Hydropower Technologies Program — Harnessing America’s abundant natural resources for clean power generation. Contents Hydropower Today ......................................... 1 Enhancing Generation and Environmental Performance ......... 6 Large Turbine Field-Testing ............................... 9 Providing Safe Passage for Fish ........................... 9 Improving Mitigation Practices .......................... 11 From the Laboratories to the Hydropower Communities ..... 12 Hydropower Tomorrow .................................... 14 Developing the Next Generation of Hydropower ............ 15 Integrating Wind and Hydropower Technologies ............ 16 Optimizing Project Operations ........................... 17 The Federal Wind and Hydropower Technologies Program ..... 19 Mission and Goals ...................................... 20 2003 Hydropower Research Highlights Alden Research Center completes prototype turbine tests at their facility in Holden, MA . 9 Laboratories form partnerships to develop and test new sensor arrays and computer models . 10 DOE hosts Workshop on Turbulence at Hydroelectric Power Plants in Atlanta . 11 New retrofit aeration system designed to increase the dissolved oxygen content of water discharged from the turbines of the Osage Project in Missouri . 11 Low head/low power resource assessments completed for conventional turbines, unconventional systems, and micro hydropower . 15 Wind and hydropower integration activities in 2003 aim to identify potential sites and partners . 17 Cover photo: To harness undeveloped hydropower resources without using a dam as part of the system that produces electricity, researchers are developing technologies that extract energy from free flowing water sources like this stream in West Virginia. ii HYDROPOWER TODAY Water power — it can cut deep canyons, chisel majestic mountains, quench parched lands, and transport tons — and it can generate enough electricity to light up millions of homes and businesses around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Hydropower Still Be Considered a Clean Energy Source? Compelling Evidence from a Middle-Sized Hydropower Station in China
    sustainability Article Can Hydropower Still Be Considered a Clean Energy Source? Compelling Evidence from a Middle-Sized Hydropower Station in China Xuerong Li 1, Faliang Gui 2,* and Qingpeng Li 3 1 Jiangxi Engineering Research Centre of Water Engineering Safety and Resources Efficient Utilization, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang 330099, China 2 Scientific Research Office, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang 330099, China 3 State Grid Nanchang Electric Power Supply Company, Nanchang 330012, China * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-791-88125948 Received: 5 July 2019; Accepted: 4 August 2019; Published: 7 August 2019 Abstract: The development of clean energy is of great importance in alleviating both the energy crisis and environmental pollution resulting from rapid global economic growth. Hydroelectric generation is considered climate benign, as it neither requires fossil carbon to produce energy nor emits large amounts of greenhouse gases (GHG), unlike conventional energy generation techniques such as coal and oil power plants. However, dams and their associated reservoirs are not entirely GHG-neutral and their classification as a clean source of energy requires further investigation. This study evaluated the environmental impact of the Xiajiang hydropower station based on life cycle assessment (LCA) according to the 2006 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) guidelines, focusing specifically on GHG emissions after the submersion of the reservoir. Results reveal that although hydropower is not as clean as we thought, it is still an absolute “low emissions” power type in China. The amount of GHG emissions produced by this station is 3.72 million tons with an emissions coefficient of 32.63 g CO2eq/kWh.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Hydropower Market Report
    U.S. Hydropower Market Report Water Power Technologies Office January 2021 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY & RENEWABLE ENERGY 1 Introduction • This is the third complete edition of the U.S. Hydropower Market Report (the first two were the 2014 and 2017 Hydropower Market Reports, published in 2015 and 2018, respectively). • In intervening years between publishing the full report, updated data are also summarized and released, and can be found at the Oak Ridge National Lab (ORNL) HydroSource website. • Prior to the first Market Report being published, there was a noted lack of publicly available and easily accessible information about hydropower in the United States and other important trends affecting the industry. • This edition focuses on updated data from 2017–2019* (the years for which new data has become available since the publication of the last full report), and contextualizes this information compared to evolving high-level trends over the past 10–20 years. * For some of the datasets in the report, the last year of data available at the time of writing was 2018 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY & RENEWABLE ENERGY 2 Outline • Chapter 1 – Looking Back: An Overview of Changes Across the U.S. Hydropower and PSH Fleet • Chapter 2 – Looking Forward: Future U.S. Hydropower and PSH Development Pipeline • Chapter 3 - U.S. Hydropower in the Global Context • Chapter 4 - U.S. Hydropower Price Trends • Chapter 5 – U.S. Hydropower Cost and Performance Metrics • Chapter 6 - Trends in U.S. Hydropower Supply Chain • Chapter 7 – Overview of New Policies Influencing the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Small-Scale Hydropower Plants in Sites of Environmental Value: an Italian Case Study
    sustainability Article The Small-Scale Hydropower Plants in Sites of Environmental Value: An Italian Case Study Marianna Rotilio *, Chiara Marchionni and Pierluigi De Berardinis Department of Civil, Architecture, Environmental Engineering, University of Studies of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy; [email protected] (C.M.); [email protected] (P.D.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-349-6102-863 Received: 18 October 2017; Accepted: 29 November 2017; Published: 30 November 2017 Abstract: Since ancient times water has been accompanying technological change in the energy sector. Used as a source of hydraulic energy, it currently generates one-fifth of the global electricity production. However, according to collective imagination, hydroelectric plants are constructions of high environmental, acoustic, and visual impact, which may harm the preservation of the territory. This paper intends to address the topic of mini-hydropower that, in addition to providing the production of renewable energy, ensures a limited environmental impact even in delicate contexts with high landscape values, by elaborating a research methodology that makes these interventions compatible with them. The process of “global compatibility” checks developed to assess the feasibility of the intervention will be explained in the paper. We intend to describe here the research process undertaken to make the planning of this type of system sustainable, in contexts that need to be rehabilitated in relation both to the accessibility of citizens and to the environmental enhancement. The intervention planned will be characterized by the combined use of other renewable energy sources, in addition to water. The proposed methodology has been tested on a case study in the village of Roccacasale, in the province of L’Aquila.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Indoor Air Pollution During the Decorating Process and Inhalation Health Risks in Xi’An, China: a Case Study
    Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 19: 854–864, 2019 Copyright © Taiwan Association for Aerosol Research ISSN: 1680-8584 print / 2071-1409 online doi: 10.4209/aaqr.2018.07.0261 Evaluation of Indoor Air Pollution during the Decorating Process and Inhalation Health Risks in Xi’an, China: A Case Study Tian Chang1, Jinhui Wang2, Jiaqi Lu1, Zhenxing Shen1*, Yu Huang3, Jian Sun1, Hongmei Xu1, Xin Wang4, Dongxiao Ren1, Junji Cao3 1 Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China 2 NICU, Xi’an Children’s Hospital, Xi’an 710003, China 3 Key Lab of Aerosol Chemistry & Physics, SKLLQG, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi’an 710049, China 4 Multiphase Chemistry Department, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, 55128, Germany ABSTRACT PM2.5, formaldehyde, and 8 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were observed in 6 newly decorated apartment units to evaluate the effects of the decorating process on the indoor air quality in Xi’an, China. The comparison of indoor and outdoor formaldehyde and VOCs concentrations showed that the outdoor PM2.5 concentration exceeded the indoor one during the monitoring process, whereas the indoor formaldehyde and VOCs concentrations exceeded the outdoor ones. The levels of formaldehyde and VOCs in different rooms were investigated, and the concentrations in the bedroom were found to be the highest. Furthermore, the formaldehyde and VOCs concentrations were measured in 200 other rooms decorated within a 2-year period in Xi’an, and the results indicated that wallpapering, wooden flooring, and furniture were the major decorating processes emitting these compounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydropower Generation, Flood Control and Cascade Effect: a National
    Hydropower generation, flood control and cascade effect: A national assessment for Vietnam Tien-Viet Nguyen PhD Candidate Department of Economics, University of Birmingham, UK ([email protected]) Prepared for The tenth Vietnam Economist Annual Meeting 2017 Abstract In this paper, we apply the SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) discharge sim- ulation coupled with econometric methods to model the performance of hydropower plants on a national scale in Vietnam - a hydro-dependent country with a diversity of terrain and climate conditions. A watershed is formed from three large inter-boundary basins: Red River, Vietnam Coast and Lower Mekong River with a total area of 977,964 km2. These are then divided into 7,887 subbasins with a mean area of 131.6km2 (based on level 12 of HydroSHEDS/HydroBASINS datasets) and 53,024 HRUs. River flow is simulated for the 40 largest hydropower plants across Vietnam from 1995 to mid-2014, coinciding with the period when both power supply and power demand rose quickly and hydropower played a prominent role in the national power source. Simulated flow appears to be a good proxy for the inflow into hydropower dams and our baseline model is able to capture 87.7% of the variation in monthly generation. In the subsequent ex- tensions of our models, we find evidence of the flood control benefit and an existence of a cascade effect for electric dams with large reservoirs providing potential resilience to the national power supply when there are adverse impacts from climate change. How- ever the harmony among dams are found to be not uniform across basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Development of the Hydropower Sector: Lessons From
    POLICY BRIEF BIODIVERSITY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE HYDROPOWER SECTOR: LESSONS FROM THE VIETNAMESE EXPERIENCE Biodiversity and Hydropower in Vietnam Introduction This policy brief provides an overview of relevant biodiversity issues for those carrying out assessments or studies relating to hydropower development in Vietnam. The Brief is volume 3 in the 5-volume information kit - Biodiversity and Development of the Hydropower Sector: Lessons from the Vietnamese Experience. It targets civil society, Government and donors and aims to be an accessible, practical summary of Volume I – which reviews current knowledge on the relationship between hydropower and its effects on biodiversity as distilled from a number of Strategic Environmental Assessments conducted in Vietnam. The Government of Vietnam has embarked on a major expansion of the hydropower sector, which is transforming the aquatic systems of the country. All main river systems are or will be dammed by one or more hydropower projects – each with road access and transmission lines and linked development shaping the terrestrial, aquatic and social environment. The overall effects on biodiversity of Vietnam’s comprehensive hydropower development will be significant – involving a total transformation of the nation’s aquatic systems and a reshaping of large segments of its terrestrial systems. The mechanisms for addressing social and environmental effects and the full economic consequences of hydropower developments are not adequate. The pace and scale of hydropower development is well beyond existing mechanisms and capacities for addressing social and environmental effects and the full economic consequences. Hydropower development is proceeding on a rapid and comprehensive scale for maximising power and profits but with only rudimentary or even misleading information and analysis on its sustainability and implications for other sectors and social and natural systems.
    [Show full text]