Endometrial Effects of Serms Santiago Palacios
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Chapter 11 Endometrial Effects of SERMs Santiago Palacios 11.1 Introduction SERMs(SelectiveEstrogenReceptorModulators)arecompoundswithamolec- ular structure different from that of steroids. They share with steroids their selective binding to estrogen receptors (ERs), which is followed by an agonistic or antagonistic effect, depending on the target cell and the hormonal environ- ment. Initially known as antiestrogens, and developed for treatment of breast cancer, the two better known SERMs tamoxifen and raloxifene are being used currently in the prevention and treatment of breast cancer and osteoporosis, respectively. A recently published review of a total of 37,000 women in 55 trials confirmed that, when used as an additional treatment, tamoxifen significantly improved 10-year survival in women with breast cancer positive for ER (Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group 1998). Nevertheless, the incidence ofendometrialcancerappearedtodoubleafter1to2yearsoftreatment, and nearly quadrupled when treatment lasted for 5 years (Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group 1998). These clinical observations demonstrate that the effect of tamoxifen and other SERMs on the endometrium needs to be studied in depth in order to offer objective evidence-based information on these compounds to our patients. This chapter provides a summary of the information available on the mechanism of action and on the clinical data of SERMs on the endometrium. 11.2 MechanismofActionintheEndometrium As has been widely commented in previous chapters, the agonist/antagonist profile of a given SERM is determined by the type of compound and the particular target tissue. Members of the different SERM families bind to the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of the ER, whose particular crystal structure has been revealed for estradiol and for raloxifene (Brzozowski et al. 1997). Once inserted into the binding cavity, estradiol makes direct hydrogen bonds bewteen its A-ring and 272 S. Palacios the carboxylate of Glu 353, the guanidinium group of Arg 394, and between a water molecule, and between its D-ring and His 524 (Brzozowski et al. 1997). As a consequence of the estradiol insertion within the LBD, the large helix 12 of the ER folds over and traps the steroid, thus exposing three specific amino acids, 540, 543, and 547, critical within the activating function-2 (AF-2) region for binding coactivators (Tzukerman et al. 1994). Raloxifene is also anchored to the same three amino acids as estradiol by direct hydrogen bonds, but it also interacts with Asp 351. The final orientation of raloxifene within the binding pocket determines that its side chain dis- places helix 12. Then, helix 12 becomes reoriented and cannot seal the pocket containing the ligand (MacGregor et al. 1998). The repositioned AF-2 region impairs the formation of transcription complex by coactivators, and the signal transduction is blocked. 11.2.1 Tamoxifen Together with other members of the triphenylethylene family, tamoxifen has been shown to act as an AF-2 antagonist, a trait shared with raloxifene. How- ever, tamoxifen and other triphenylethylene derivatives act as partial ago- nists in the uterus, an effect that seems opposite to that of raloxifene. It may, therefore, be postulated that at the endometrial level (where both ta- moxifen and raloxifene share the same tissue and promoter context), the contrasting action of those compounds may be due to particular details of the conformational change induced on the ligand–receptor complex, at ei- ther the AF-2 or other domain. Recent results obtained in mice further sup- port the notion that tamoxifen acts in the endometrium as a classical im- peded estrogen and that the AF-1 domain regulates its effects (Zhang et al. 2005). The proliferative effects of tamoxifen on the endometrium have been sup- ported by molecular data. The expression of both ER and progesterone recep- tors (PRs) was found to be consistently positive in endometria from women treated with tamoxifen for 1 month (Cano et al. 2000). That positivity has been reported to be even higher than that found in a control group of pre- menopausal women (Kommoss et al. 1998). Tamoxifen also mimicked estra- diol treatment in up-regulating ERs, c-fos, and glyceraldehyde phosphate de- hydrogenase mRNAs, together with other estrogen-induced genes (Rivera- Gonzalez et al. 1998; Robertson et al. 1998). The bromo-deoxyuridine index, an indicator of cell mitogenesis, has been shown to increase in endome- trial cells from tamoxifen-treated uteri (Karlsson et al. 1998; Carthew et al. 1999). In this connection, the expression of markers of proliferation, e.g., Ki67, was potentiated by tamoxifen in human endometrium (Elkas et al. 11 Endometrial Effects of SERMs 273 1998). More recently, tamoxifen increased Ki67 expression in the human endometrial adenocarcinoma Ishikawa cell line (Koda et al. 2004). An in- creased susceptibility to genetic lesions associated with carcinogenesis linked to tamoxifen was suggested by a study on endometrium of surgically post- menopausal cynomolgus macaques, where the drug induced p53 positivity, although at a lower level than conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) (Isaksson et al. 1999). The available experimental information is still of little help in clarifying whether tamoxifen is genotoxic and oncogenetic in human endometrium. There is, nonetheless, a great deal of debate about the actual relevance of minor concentrations of adducts (as detected by high-perfomance liquid chro- matography and other modern technology), compared with the high con- centrations induced in rat hepatic tumors, or the equally elevated concen- trations formed in human DNA as a result of enviromental sources (Swen- berg et al. 1997). Accordingly, if tamoxifen is an endometrial carcinogen, as classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), its mechanism of action is possibly different from that reported in rat liver. An alternative oncogenetic mode of action of tamoxifen on human en- dometrium may derive from its proliferative activity. It is possible that the increase in the rate of mitoses in a given tissue entails an augmented risk of mutation, the first step toward malignancy (Ames et al. 1990). Therefore, it is possible that the oncogenetic attributes of estrogens in tissues where they induce a proliferative effect (e.g., breast or endometrium) might be influ- enced by the mutagenic potential derived from a higher mitotic activity. This might also be the main pathway for the oncogenetic action of tamoxifen in the uterus, where one study showed that an increase in uterine weight by tamox- ifen was accompanied by a doubled uterine expression of insulinlike growth factor-I (IGF-I), whereas the opposite occurred when the pure antiestrogen ICI 182780 was used instead of tamoxifen (Huynh et al. 1993). In a subse- quent study, the same investigators showed that the expression of insulinlike growth factor-binding protein (IGFBP)-3, the principal quantitative binder of IGF-I, was similarly suppressed by estradiol and tamoxifen (Huynh et al. 1994). The dysregulation of transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) has also been suggested as an additional epigenetic (nongenotoxic) mechanism of tamox- ifen carcinogenicity (Carmichael et al. 1998). It has been postulated that the tamoxifen-induced dysregulation of the TGFβ signalling pathway may cre- ate an environment that selects for the cells with genetic alterations in the signal system (Carmichael et al. 1998). Cells with mutations in this pathway become refractory to mitosis inhibitory signals, thus developing into end-stage tumors. 274 S. Palacios 11.2.2 Raloxifene Crystallographic studies have confirmed that a critical difference in the antie- strogenic action of raloxifene lies in the interaction of the alkylaminoethoxy side chain with the amino acid aspartate at position 351. The peculiar orienta- tion of this side chain of the raloxifene molecule, an essential determinant of the antiestrogenic properties of the drug, is believed to account for its lack of endometrial activity (Clark et al. 1976; Grese et al. 1997; Bryant et al. 1998). Biochemical data support the lack of agonistic activity of raloxifene on uter- ine tissue (Somjen et al. 1996). Raloxifene has exhibited little uterothropic activity in rodents (Black and Goode 1980, 1981; Black et al. 1983) and has not resulted in increases in uterine weight or in stimulation of epithelial cell height and eosinophilic infiltration (Bryant et al. 1998). In other experiments on ovariectomized rats, raloxifene was similar to the no-treatement controls with regard to uterine epithelial cell height myometrial thickness and stromal expansion (Black et al. 1994; Sato et al. 1996). There are, however, discrepant data showing increases in uterine weight and uterine epithelial thickness in ovariectomized (Sato et al. 1996) or immature (Ashby et al. 1997) rats. Interest- ingly, raloxifene has been shown to block the stimulating endometrial effects of estrogen and tamoxifen (Bryant et al. 1998; Black et al. 1994; Sato et al. 1996; Palacios et al. 2000), an effect confirmed on an endometrial carcinoma cell line grown in athymic mice (Kleinman et al. 1996). Table 11.1. Actions of SERMs on uterus. Preclinical data (Gottardis et al. 1990) – In ovariectomized rats • Tamoxifen produces a trophic effect: ·↑weight of uterus ·↑thickness of endometrium ·↑thickness of myometrium – Raloxifene produces a minimum effect on: • Weight of uterus • Endometrium • Myometrium – Ovariectomized rats treated with estrogens