DOCSLIB.ORG

ANNUAL REPORT Revisiting Deglobalisation:2018 a Vision for Progressive Social Transformation 2 | Focus on the Global South Annual Report 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ANNUAL REPORT Revisiting Deglobalisation:2018 a Vision for Progressive Social Transformation 2 | Focus on the Global South Annual Report 2019 ANNUAL REPORT Revisiting Deglobalisation:2018 A vision for progressive social transformation 2 | Focus on the Global South Annual Report 2019 marks the first year of Focus on the 2018Global South’s (Focus) new three-year work plan for 2018 to 2020 under the overall theme, “Revisiting Deglobalisation: a vision for progressive social transformation”. This work plan has three interrelated thematic areas: Political Economy of Development, Power and Democracy, and People’s Alternatives, which frame key issue areas and projects. The following is a narrative of the activities grouped along the key highlights and achievements of our work in the year 2018. The details of key activities and outputs, including dates, and places can be found in the annex, which has been separated to give a better sense of how Focus conducted its activities. Focus on the Global South staff in February 2019. Focus on the Global South Annual Report 2019 | 3 Highlights and 12Achievements of 2018 1. Drawing strength from integrated strategies that are grounded and networked Focus on the Global South engages high gional and international organisations, net- level national and international policy works and coalitions on trade- investment, platforms on trade, investment and human finance, regionalism, peoples’ rights to land, rights, but also works with communities commons, food sovereignty, gender equal- and people’s organizations at the grass- ity, systemic alternatives, environment and roots and national levels. Our advocacies climate, to expand our work across different are based on our knowledge of impacts sectors and groups, as well as to develop the and actions at multiple levels by different content of our analyses and advocacies. Our groups/actors, providing platforms and India and Philippines offices have organized opportunities for representatives from and maintained long-term networks such different constituencies and communities as the Forum Against FTAs, Trade Justice to directly articulate their struggles, for ex- Pilipinas and the Save Agrarian Reform ample on investor-state dispute settlement Alliance, that link international campaigning (ISDS), free trade agreements (FTAs), with local contexts, and enable us to share investment projects, democratization, our analyses, actions and updates on relevant peasant rights, rights to land, water and topics and issues. territory, and accountability of transna- tional corporations (TNC). The work with and support for communi- ty-based action researchers in Cambodia, Focus partners with local, national, re- who are at the forefront of land and natural 4 | Focus on the Global South Annual Report 2019 resource struggles, reflect the concrete Internationally and regionally, Focus is realities of the impacts of extractive in- an active member of networks such as the vestments and policies on communities. Asia-Europe People’s Forum (AEPF), Land These and their communities continued to Research Action Network (LRAN), NGO be strengthened through practical train- Forum on ADB, Save the Mekong, Asia ings, exposure visits inside and outside Pacific Movement on Debt and Develop- the country, overseas exchange visits, local ment (APMDD), and the ASEAN Peoples’ and national issue-based workshop, and Forum (APF), as well as in campaigns on semi-annual reflection meetings. the Binding Treaty for corporate account- ability, International Financial Institutions In the Philippines, Focus works with fish- (IFIs), the World Trade Organisation erfolk, indigenous peoples, peasant, labour (WTO) and new generation Free Trade and human rights groups to contribute to Agreements (FTAs). These networks and their resistance against urgent issues (resist campaigns provide spaces for us to share Manila Bay Reclamation, assert indige- and build collective analyses, and for our nous rights in the Bangsamoro Basic Law, grassroots partners to participate and am- land grabbing, mobilise against misogyny plify their voices. and extra -judicial kilings, oppose rice tariffication, etc.). Asia-Europe People’s Forum 2018 in Ghent, Belgium. [ September 2018] Thai farmers sell their products at a commemora- tion fair for the Thai Farmer’s Federation anniver- sary. [October 2018] Various groups press the Philippines military for accountabilty on a massacre of indigenous peo- ples. [8 December 2018] Focus on the Global South Annual Report 2019 | 5 2. Strengthened integration of gender issues In our new workplan, gender is a cross raise awareness on women’s rights, and to cutting issue, not only because of gender encourage greater participation of people differentiated impacts of trends, poli- with communities involved in land/natural cies, programmes and agreements, on resource struggles. the struggles of various sectors, but also because we work with women’s groups in In the Philippines, Focus has long term co- different sectors. More importantly, there operation with national women’s networks is a need to highlight the gender dimen- of peasants (PKKK, the National Coalition sion of issues that cut across sectors and of Rural Women) and indigenous peo- often place particular and heavier burdens ples (Lilak: Purple Action for Indigenous on women. Women’s Rights) through campaign plat- forms for the commons, the Save Agrar- In Cambodia, the community-based ian Reform Alliance, and the Loyukan action research teams (ARTs) among campaign. This year, both women’s groups farming, fishing, forest and urban workers’ have joined the Focus-initiated platform communities count on strong and deter- on food sovereignty among small-scale mined women leaders in their respective producers. struggles against destructive resource de- velopment and investment projects. They On March 8, Focus launched online photo also lead livelihood projects that make exhibition titled The Hands that Feed communities more viable and resilient. Us to explain and draw attention to the To link the importance of gender in land crucial role of women in food provision, and natural resource conflicts, the ARTs as well as the issues and structures that and their communities organized local surround their often unrecognized work. events in three provinces on national tree The exhibit features photographs by Focus planting day, International Women’s Day staff and partners. and International Human Rights Day to Indigenous women join the State-of-the-Nation protest on 24 July 2018. 6 | Focus on the Global South Annual Report 2019 POLITICAL ECONOMY OF DEVELOPMENT 3. Consolidating and broadening resistance to RCEP and new generation FTAs This year continued to reflect the shift in civil society groups issued a statement to trade justice advocacy from a focus on the denounce this backwards move by the WTO toward mega-FTAs. Particularly for Singaporean government. Asia, the Regional Comprehensive Eco- nomic Partnership (RCEP)—involving 16 Prior to the next round of negotiations in countries in the region—has become the Bangkok in late July, Focus held national most urgent trade issue involving trans- meetings on RCEP in Cambodia and Thai- parency of the negotiations, lack of public land, participated in by grassroots com- scrutiny and participation, and potential munities, labor organizations and trade impact on communities, food sovereign- unions, women organizations, academics ty, self-determination and public health. and NGO partners, to discuss the impact Focus participated in civil society events of the agreement on health, access to med- during the official RCEP negotiation icines, agriculture, labour rights and the round in Singapore from May 2-5, includ- commons. A press conference was held on ing speaking at a workshop on trade with the same day as the meeting in Bangkok to public sector unions organized by Public brief the Thai press on the issues at stake Services International. Unlike previous during the RCEP negotiations. In India, negotiation rounds which included stake- Focus regularly includes RCEP in its advo- holder engagements with civil society, the cacy and workshops on agrarian and de- Singapore government instead held con- velopment issues. A highlight of such in- sultations with business. Focus and other vitations is conducting a session on RCEP Anti-RCEP protests in Manila (above), New Delhi (opposite page, top), and Bali (bottom) Focus on the Global South Annual Report 2019 | 7 and agriculture at the Kisan Swaraj Sammelan farmers’ assembly meeting in Ahmedabad, Gujarat (see discussion paper here) on 2-3 November. Discuss- ing these topics helped participants formulate and articulate their positions toward the emerging free trading bloc in relation to protecting their land, water and natural resources, traditional knowledge and plant varieties, as well as how the agreement will affect de- mocracy and corporate and government and an overview of the possible impact accountability to the people. Local and na- RCEP will have on different constituen- tional discussions on RCEP helped mobi- cies. The meeting was also an opportunity lize and bring together local organizations, to share information on their campaigns grassroots communities, and academia to and initiatives, assess the current regional create initiatives to further discuss and to coordination of the campaign, and plan create monitoring networks on RCEP and the work ahead. Focus contributed to pub- other trade and investment agreements’ lications and outreach in regard the RCEP, impact on the local people and economy. including co-publishing the book RCEP: A Secret Deal, and taking part in a News- During the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WTO Public Forum 2007 “How Can the WTO Help Harness Globalisation?” I II
    This new edition of the WTO Public Forum provides an overview of discussions at the 2007 Forum, whose theme was “How can the WTO help harness globalization?”. 2007 The Forum provided participants with a unique opportunity 2007 to debate among themselves and with WTO members on how the WTO can best contribute to the management of 20072007 WTO Public Forum Public WTO WTO Public Forum Public WTO WTOWTO globalization. This publication summarizes the views and concerns expressed during the two-day programme. Topics for debate included the challenges presented by globalisation, the need for a coherent multilateral trading system, trade as PublicPublic ForumForum a vehicle for growth and development, and the interaction of trade and sustainable development. “How Can the WTO Help Harness Globalization?” “How Can the WTO Help Harness Globalization?” WTO Can the “How “How Can the WTO Help Harness Globalization?” WTO Can the “How 4-5 October 2007 ISBN 978-92-870-3472-4 20072007 WTOWTO Public Forum “How Can the WTO Help Harness Globalisation?” 04 - 05 October 07 © World Trade Organization, 2008. Reproduction of material contained in this document may be made only with written permission of the WTO Publications Manager. With written permission of the WTO Publications Manager, reproduction and use of the material contained in this document for non-commercial educational and training purposes is encouraged. ISBN: 978-92-870-3472-4 Also available in French and Spanish: French title ISBN: 978-92-870-3473-1 Spanish title ISBN: 978-92-870-3474-8 (Price:
    [Show full text]
  • Tisa:The Trade in Services Agreement and How It Threatens
    The trouble with The Trade in Services Agreement and how it threatens transport TiSA: workers’ rights By Professor Jane Kelsey, Dr Jane Kelsey is a Professor of Law at the University of Auckland, New Zealand. The report was peer reviewed by Professor Robert Faculty of Law, the University Stumberg from the Harrison Institute for Public Law, Georgetown of Auckland, New Zealand University Law Center, Washington DC, USA. Commissioned by the International Transport Workers’ Federation and Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung The trouble with The Trade in Services Agreement and how it threatens transport TiSA: workers’ rights By Professor Jane Kelsey, Dr Jane Kelsey is a Professor of Law at the University of Auckland, New Zealand. The report was peer reviewed by Professor Robert Faculty of Law, the University Stumberg from the Harrison Institute for Public Law, Georgetown of Auckland, New Zealand University Law Center, Washington DC, USA. Commissioned by the International Transport Workers’ Federation and Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung EXECUTIVE SUMMARY barriers, including protections for workers – or at least freeze them at their current level, and promise never to adopt new regulations that might restrict existing and new services or technologies (think of drones, robots and driverless vehicles). TiSA’s transparency annex would give other TiSA governments and corporations rights to lobby against proposed regulations that affect their interests. 1. The International Transport Workers’ Federation (ITF) is a global trade union federation. The rules that govern the global services market shape TISA AND THE FOURTH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION the daily lives of its affiliated unions and their members. The Trade in 6. The radical impact of new technologies has been called the ‘fourth industrial Services Agreement (TiSA) has the potential to dramatically change that revolution’.
    [Show full text]
  • No Climate Justice Without Trade Justice
    No climate justice without trade justice The Fair Trade Movement calls on the Parties of the UNFCCC to act on their commitments under the Paris Agreement and to prioritise fair trading practices in the global supply chains as indispensable for climate justice. The Climate Crisis is unjust – its impact is felt most severely by those who are least responsible for it. Smallholder farmers in the Global South are suffering the effects of climate change: droughts and floods, changing ripening and harvesting patterns, new climate-related pests, weeds and diseases and reduced yields. With the COVID-19 pandemic the same is true: The most marginalised are hit hardest as infection spread and/or lockdown measures have a negative impact on their work and trade. Both the climate and COVID-19 crisis are symptoms of the root disease: They are stark reminders of the powerful correlations between the global economic model and the larger health and environmental crises we are facing, also in the form of loss of biodiversity, deforestation, etc. An economic model where a significant imbalance in power in supply chains means that poor and marginalised producers and workers in global supply chains are being kept in perpetual poverty with unsustainable livelihoods, while buyers/retailers are reaping profits for their shareholders on the back of smallholders’ and SMEs’ crops and products. A key example is deforestation, which is chiefly driven by the current model for cocoa and coffee supply chains. A small group of big actors in the Global North capture high profits, while farmers in the Global South are pressured to deliver more and more product at prices below cost of production, often resulting in undesirable practices such as deforestation, use of child labour, and perpetual poverty.
    [Show full text]
  • Position Paper of the Fair Trade Movement on COP25
    Position Paper of the Fair Trade movement on COP25 NO CLIMATE RESILIENCE WITHOUT TRADE JUSTICE SMALLHOLDER FARMERS MUST BE AT THE HEART OF THE GLOBAL CLIMATE CRISIS NEGOTIATIONS The Amazon fires and the social explosions sparked abandoning their fields and migrating as their by environmental degradation across the planet, adaptation strategy of last resort. Concrete and coupled with globe-spanning strikes on Fridays ambitious action is urgently needed to redress the for Future, bring to light the emergency of the concerns surrounding migration and food security climate crisis facing the planet at the time of risks that haunt the world’s SDG aspirations. That the 25th Conference of the Parties to the United is why the global Fair Trade movement urges the Nations Framework Convention on Climate Parties of the UNFCCC to recognise that fair trading Change (UNFCCC), COP25. At the centre of the policies and practices are a crucial component of crisis are smallholder farmers, who increasingly climate mitigation and adaptation strategies. Urgent struggle with droughts, floods and with changing investment is needed to build a climate-resilient and unpredictable weather patterns. Many are economy based on social and economic justice. How Climate Change is exacerbating poverty and vulnerability of smallholder farmers > Additional stress on land exacerbates existing risks to livelihoods, food systems, biodiversity and infrastructure as well as human and ecosystem health; > Climate-related risks including those related to livelihoods, food and water
    [Show full text]
  • California Trade Justice Coalition
    CALIFORNIA TRADE JUSTICE COALITION Presidential Candidate Questionnaire Candidate Name: Bernie Sanders Campaign Office Address: ________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ Campaign Contact: ______________________________________________________ Contact Phone: _________________________________________________________ Email: ________________________________________________________________ The California Trade Justice Coalition (CTJC) is an alliance of labor, environmental, public health, immigrant rights and human rights organizations — all committed to building a strong California economy that works for all. CTJC’s member organizations include the Alliance for Democracy, Association of Western Pulp & Paper Workers, California Labor Federation, California Nurses Association, Communications Workers of America District 9, Food & Water Watch, Friends of the Earth, Global Exchange, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 595, International Longshore & Warehouse Union Southern California District Council, Local Clean Energy Alliance, Napa/Solano Central Labor Council, Rooted in Resilience, Sacramento Central Labor Council, Sierra Club San Francisco Bay Chapter and United Steelworkers District 12. We are interested in knowing what you think about a variety of issues regarding international trade policy. Answers to the following questions will be used to educate voters, highlight trade issues and create voter guides. Please return your completed questionnaire
    [Show full text]
  • Uk-Africa Trade After Brexit: Challenges and Opportunities a Briefing for the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Africa
    UK-AFRICA TRADE AFTER BREXIT: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES A BRIEFING FOR THE ALL-PARTY PARLIAMENTARY GROUP FOR AFRICA NOVEMBER 2020 This is not an official publication of the House of Commons or the House of Lords. It has not been approved by either House or its committees. All-Party Parliamentary Groups are informal groups of Members of both Houses with a common interest in particular issues. The views expressed in this report are those of the group and its partners. FOREWORD As we come to the end of the UK’s transition some of these themes in consideration of both period with the EU, which expires on 31 December the immediate, and longer-term future, for trade 2020, there is an urgency to ensure that the UK’s between the UK and Africa. independent trade policy is not undermining Africa’s vision for development, achievement of The global landscape has of course changed the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) or UK quite dramatically since this event was held in aid spending. However, at present, against the Westminster in January of this year. The global advice of the African Union and in contradiction health pandemic resulting from the spread of the Memorandum of Understanding signed of Covid-19 has reminded everyone of how between the AU and the UK in February 2019, interconnected our world has become, and how the UK government is using the Brexit deadline vulnerable its economies are to such a disruption. to push through bilateral deals with some select While the extent of the economic fallout is still not African countries without proper parliamentary clear, the pandemic has brought into sharp focus scrutiny or civil society oversight.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxes on Trial. How Trade Deals Threaten Tax Justice
    February 2016 Taxes on trial How trade deals threaten tax justice Research by Claire Provost 1 | Taxes on Trial: How trade deals threaten tax justice Demands for tax justice have resounded worldwide, with inequality at historic and unsustainable levels and increased attention towards the tax practices of major multinational corporations from Google to Starbucks. Governments must be able to change their tax systems to respond to ensure multinationals pay their fair share and to ensure that critical public services are well funded. States must also be able to reconsider and withdraw tax breaks previously granted to multinationals if they no longer fit with national priorities. But their ability to do so, to change tax laws and pursue progressive tax policies, may be severely limited by the powerful investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) system, also known as ISDS, through which foreign investors can sue states directly at international tribunals. This system has become increasingly controversial thanks to negotiations over the proposed Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) investment deal between Europe and the United States. But access to ISDS is already enshrined in thousands of free trade and investment agreements crisscrossing the globe. Because control over taxes is seen as a core to a country’s sovereignty, many states have included tax-related ‘carve-out’ clauses in these trade and investment treaties to limit ability of corporations and other investors to sue over such disputes. But a growing number of investor-state cases have in fact challenged government tax decisions - from the withdrawal of previously granted tax breaks to multinationals to the imposition of higher taxes on profits from oil and mining.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Trade Law Needs a Theory of Justice Frank J
    Boston College Law School Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School Boston College Law School Faculty Papers January 2006 Why Trade Law Needs a Theory of Justice Frank J. Garcia Boston College Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/lsfp Part of the Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons, International Law Commons, and the International Trade Law Commons Recommended Citation Frank J. Garcia. "Why Trade Law Needs a Theory of Justice." Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law) 100, (2006): 376-380. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Law School Faculty Papers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 376 ASIL Proceedings, 2006 redistribute (fairly share the pie)? In sum, does "just trade" simply mean "go ahead and trade as much as you can" or does itmean something more, as in "just" or "fair" trade? It is too easy to laugh away the notion of justice and trade as quaint or purely academic. Yet governments, themain actors in trade negotiations, are made up of people, and elected by people. As ethical and moral obligations play a role formany individuals, theymust necessarily reflect also on government decisions; ifnot in formal trade negotiations or before WTO panels, then at least in the court of public opinion. Why Trade Law Needs a Theory of Justice By Frank J. Garcia* I.
    [Show full text]
  • Future of the Global Trade Order
    2nd Edition Future of the Global Trade Order The world economy is going through major economic and geopolitical shifts, fostering tensions in the global economic governance structure centered on the IMF, World Bank and the WTO. The impacts of globalization are being questioned while disruptive technologies continue to change the economic landscape. Populist politicians advocating for greater sovereignty and policy autonomy are attracting increasing shares of the vote in many OECD countries. The election of Donald Trump on a protectionist platform and the UK referendum in favor of Brexit may signal that the peak of globalization has been reached. This collection of papers focuses on one of the pillars of global governance: the multilateral trade system, anchored by the WTO. Membership of the WTO is now close to universal, with the accession of China in 2001 Future of the representing a landmark achievement. While the organization plays a major role in enhancing the transparency of trade policies and enforcing the rules of the game that have been agreed by members, it has not been Global Trade Order successful at negotiating new rules. The private sector is frustrated with the WTO, as are civil society groups seeking to address issues of interest to them. There is a general perception that WTO disciplines and modus Edited by operandi are outdated and have not kept pace with globalization. Carlos A. Primo Braga and Bernard Hoekman The chapters in this volume focus on key critical issues that confront the WTO membership. They review developments in trade policy and technology and regulation. They make clear there is an important global governance gap.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence from the Trade Justice Movement
    International Development Committee - Evidence from the Trade Justice Movement May 2021 Ruth Bergan & David Lawrence Background 1. The Trade Justice Movement (TJM) is a UK-wide network of sixty civil society organisations, with millions of individual members, calling for trade rules that work for people and the planet. Our members include some of the UK’s largest environmental and development NGOs. Together we are calling for trade justice, where the global system of trade ensures sustainable outcomes for ordinary people and the environment, particularly in developing countries. 2. We welcome the committee’s important and timely inquiry on climate change ahead of COP26. The UK has a unique opportunity for global leadership on climate change, which is already having a devastating effect on the planet and disproportionately impacts on less developed countries. While the Government has set ambitious targets for tackling climate change, a significant gap remains in its trade policy: there has been no explicit attempt to ensure that the UK’s trade policy helps achieve these targets and in particular little to align its policy regarding trade with developing countries with climate targets. 3. International trade is an important policy area for both climate change and development. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGS) include a number of commitments that should mean the UK and other countries actively seek to align their climate, trade and development (as well as other) policies, the most obvious being an explicit commitment to “policy coherence for development” (goal 17.14), which cuts across the other goals. SDG 13 commits countries to “take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts”, widely accepted to be fundamental to tackling poverty.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Trade Justice Just? Is Fair Trade Fair? Prof. Philip Booth IEA
    Is Trade Justice Just? Is Fair Trade Fair? Prof. Philip Booth IEA Discussion Paper No. 10 25th April 2004 Institute of Economic Affairs 2 Lord North Street London SW1P 3LB www.iea.org.uk 1 Is Trade Justice Just? Is Fair Trade Fair? Prof. Philip Booth Editorial and Programme Director, Institute of Economic Affairs, April 2005 Talk to Mid-Sussex, Churches Together Peace and Justice Groups Introduction There are several old jokes about economists, none of them very funny. Perhaps the best known is, “if you have six economists, you will have seven points of view”. The reason I wanted to participate in this event tonight is because issues of trade are the most complex in economics and I believe that people who have been promoting discussion on these issues have lost sight of the fact that there is, in fact, another point of view. Fundamental to understanding the relationship between trade and material well being of the poor is an understanding of why people in the so-called developing world are poor in the first place. The reality of life in many underdeveloped countries is an absence of the basic features of good government. These features are stated lucidly in the Catholic Catechism. They are: peace, the rule of law, the authority of law, the absence of corruption, independent judicial processes, the enforcement of contracts, basic free markets or freedom to exchange goods and services, and the enforcement of property rights. You can summarise these characteristics (to which the Catechism also adds sound money) in two words: peace and justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Press Release
    EMBARGOED until 29 Nov 2018, 00:01 CET PRESS RELEASE 29th November 2018 No Climate Justice without Trade Justice Small-scale farmers must be supported in the fight against climate change The International Fair Trade Movement today called on the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) to introduce transparent, fair and binding mechanisms for trade justice in order to achieve climate justice in their negotiations at COP24. More than 500 million small-scale farms provide over 80 per cent of the food consumed in the Global South. They, along with rural workers, are among the groups most affected by the devastating impacts of climate change, but their voices are not being heard in climate change negotiations. The International Fair Trade Movement strongly urges the Parties of the UNFCCC at COP24 to recognize fair trading policies and practices as an important component of climate mitigation and adaptation strategies. Their joint Policy Paper, “Trade Justice: A key component of building smallholder farmers’ climate resilience”, outlines five concrete steps needed to urgently transform the global economic system so that it works for people and planet: transparency & binding regulation; financial support; farmer-focused trainings and technical expertise; investment into agronomical research; and tax justice. “Smallholder farmers are on the front line of climate change. They contribute to global food security and to their national economies, yet they are among the most vulnerable to climate change impacts. There is therefore an urgent need for large scale action to support these farmers to confront the challenges of climate change” said Lannette Chiti, Senior Climate Change Advisor, Fairtrade International.
    [Show full text]