Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 07/01/2020 to 09/30/2020 Sawtooth National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Springfield Sockeye Hatchery Project
BONNEVILLEPOWERADMINISTRATION Springfield Sockeye Hatchery Project Finding of No Significant Impact Revision Sheet for the Environmental Assessment Mitigation Action Plan May 2012 DOE/EA – 1913 Springfield Sockeye Hatchery Project Finding of No Significant Impact Revision Sheet for the Environmental Assessment Mitigation Action Plan DOE/EA-1913 Bonneville Power Administration May 2012 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Bonneville Power Administration Springfield Sockeye Hatchery Project Finding of No Significant Impact Summary The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) is announcing its environmental findings regarding the decision to fund the Springfield Sockeye Hatchery Project (Proposed Action). BPA is proposing to fund the Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG) to modify and operate an existing hatchery facility located near the town of Springfield in Bingham County, Idaho. IDFG would convert this hatchery into a facility that would be capable of rearing up to 1 million Snake River sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) smolts for release into the Sawtooth Basin. BPA has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) (DOE/EA-1913) to evaluate the Proposed Action and its alternative. Based on the analysis in the EA, BPA has determined that, with the use of mitigation measures, the Proposed Action is not a major federal action that significantly affects the quality of the human environment, within the meaning of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969. Therefore, the preparation of an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required, and BPA is issuing this Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the Proposed Action. Comments received on the Preliminary EA as well as the responses to the comments are provided in the Revision Sheet for the EA. -
Trail Reports for Sawtooth NRA ***Unless Otherwise Reported-Expect High Creeks, Snow Levels at 9,200 Ft
Trail Reports for Sawtooth NRA ***Unless otherwise reported-expect high creeks, snow levels at 9,200 ft. and trees on trails*** Due to high winds in the area, if trees were previously reported removed there may be trees down on the trail in the future Conditions are always changing on the Forest Date Name Trail Number Trail Segment Conditions, Hazards and General Notes on Trails - Past Hellroaring towards Farley- Hellroaring to Imogene has small patches of snow 07/05/19 SRS 092 Alice Lake - Redfish Lake Trail - Hikers reported the trail to Edith lake (from Lake Imogene) looked to be deep in snow (they were not heading that far up and did not attempt). - Alice is clear of snow. Trail from Alice to Toxaway is covered in snow patches and an avalanche field. Toxaway lake is clear of snow 06/28/19 RFVC 095, 092, 096 Alice/Toxaway Loop Trail on the north side and is free to camp on. The rest of the loop had only small patches of snow. Creek crossing are still a bit high 094 Alpine Creek Trail Alpine Way - Iron Creek to Stanley Ranger 06/28/19 Visitor 528 Hiking from Alpine Way trailhead to Marshall Lake open. Goat Lake still frozen, talus fields are covered in snow but accessible Station Trail 528 Alpine Way - Stanley Lake to Iron Creek Trail 07/12/19 Alturas Creek Trail Open. 391 Amber Gulch Trail - The trail to the Born Lakes covered in snow past the saddle. Antz Basin Trail - The trail to Fourth of July Lake and Washington Lake are clear. -
Chapter 18 Southwest Idaho
Chapter: 18 State(s): Idaho Recovery Unit Name: Southwest Idaho Region 1 U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed necessary to recover and/or protect the species. Recovery plans are prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and, in this case, with the assistance of recovery unit teams, State and Tribal agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views or the official positions or indicate the approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Recovery plans represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Director or Regional Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. Literature Citation: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002. Chapter 18, Southwest Idaho Recovery Unit, Idaho. 110 p. In: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) Draft Recovery Plan. Portland, Oregon. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This chapter was developed with the assistance of the Southwest Idaho Bull Trout Recovery Unit Team, which includes: Dale Allen, Idaho Department of Fish and Game Dave Burns, U.S. Forest Service Tim Burton, U.S. Bureau of Land Management (formerly U.S. Forest Service) Chip Corsi, Idaho Department of Fish and Game Bob Danehy, Boise Corporation Jeff Dillon, Idaho Department of Fish and Game Guy Dodson, Shoshone-Paiute Tribes Jim Esch, U.S. -
Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: a Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators
USDA United States Department of Agriculture Research Natural Areas on Forest Service National Forest System Lands Rocky Mountain Research Station in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, General Technical Report RMRS-CTR-69 Utah, and Western Wyoming: February 2001 A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and E'ducators Angela G. Evenden Melinda Moeur J. Stephen Shelly Shannon F. Kimball Charles A. Wellner Abstract Evenden, Angela G.; Moeur, Melinda; Shelly, J. Stephen; Kimball, Shannon F.; Wellner, Charles A. 2001. Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-69. Ogden, UT: U.S. Departmentof Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 84 p. This guidebook is intended to familiarize land resource managers, scientists, educators, and others with Research Natural Areas (RNAs) managed by the USDA Forest Service in the Northern Rocky Mountains and lntermountain West. This guidebook facilitates broader recognitionand use of these valuable natural areas by describing the RNA network, past and current research and monitoring, management, and how to use RNAs. About The Authors Angela G. Evenden is biological inventory and monitoring project leader with the National Park Service -NorthernColorado Plateau Network in Moab, UT. She was formerly the Natural Areas Program Manager for the Rocky Mountain Research Station, Northern Region and lntermountain Region of the USDA Forest Service. Melinda Moeur is Research Forester with the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain ResearchStation in Moscow, ID, and one of four Research Natural Areas Coordinators from the Rocky Mountain Research Station. J. Stephen Shelly is Regional Botanist and Research Natural Areas Coordinator with the USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Headquarters Office in Missoula, MT. -
The National Park System
January 2009 Parks and Recreation in the United States The National Park System Margaret Walls BACKGROUNDER 1616 P St. NW Washington, DC 20036 202-328-5000 www.rff.org Resources for the Future Walls Parks and Recreation in the United States: The National Park System Margaret Walls∗ Introduction The National Park Service, a bureau within the U.S. Department of the Interior, is responsible for managing 391 sites—including national monuments, national recreation areas, national rivers, national parks, various types of historic sites, and other categories of protected lands—that cover 84 million acres. Some of the sites, such as Yellowstone National Park and the Grand Canyon, are viewed as iconic symbols of America. But the National Park Service also manages a number of small historical sites, military parks, scenic parkways, the National Mall in Washington, DC, and a variety of other protected locations. In this backgrounder, we provide a brief history of the Park Service, show trends in land acreage managed by the bureau and visitation at National Park Service sites over time, show funding trends, and present the challenges and issues facing the Park Service today. History National parks were created before there was a National Park Service. President Ulysses S. Grant first set aside land for a “public park” in 1872 with the founding of Yellowstone. Yosemite, General Grant (now part of Kings Canyon), and Sequoia National Parks in California were created in 1890, and nine years later Mount Rainier National Park was set aside in Washington. With passage of the Antiquities Act in 1906, the President was granted authority to declare historic landmarks, historic and prehistoric structures, and sites of scientific interest as national monuments. -
Nez Perce–Clearwater National Forests Forest Plan Assessment 5.0
Nez Perce–Clearwater National Forests Forest Plan Assessment 5.0 Threatened, Endangered, Proposed, and Candidate Species June 2014 Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................ i List of Figures .......................................................................................................................... ii 5.0 Threatened, Endangered, Proposed, and Candidate Species .................................. 5-3 5.1 Wildlife.................................................................................................................... 5-3 5.1.1 Canada Lynx .................................................................................................... 5-3 5.1.2 Wolverine ....................................................................................................... 5-43 5.2 Aquatics ................................................................................................................. 5-52 5.2.1 Existing Information ...................................................................................... 5-52 5.2.2 Informing the Assessment.............................................................................. 5-52 5.2.3 Literature Cited .............................................................................................. 5-64 5.3 Rare Plants............................................................................................................. 5-67 5.3.1 Existing Information ..................................................................................... -
Ashley National Forest Recreation Fee Highlights, 2016
United States Department of Agriculture Sawtooth National Forest Credit to Tony Baril 2015 Share the Experience Ashley National Forest Recreation Fee Program Accomplishment Highlights 2016 Repairing the Pump Improving Shoulder Seasons Iron Springs Group Campground is a popular site for family Unloading reunions, Boy Scout vault voilet groups, and youth at Lucerne group outings. One boat ramp. of the water pumps for the water system failed forty feet below ground. Seasonal recreation employees The Lucerne boat ramp is one of the busiest areas used scaffolding and on the Flaming Gorge National Recreation Area Repairing the Iron Springs equipment to remove Campground water system and is used throughout the year. The Forest shuts forty feet of the pump down the water system during winter to prevent assembly to replace the broken valve and return frozen and broken pipes, but leaves the boat ramp potable water to the campground. Campground open. Through leveraging grant funding from Utah recreation fee revenue covered the approximately Division of Wildlife Resources of $17,000 using $3,500 in labor and supplies. $5,000 of recreation fee revenue, the Forest purchased and installed a vault toilet at Lucerne for shoulder season and winter use. Recreation Fee Dollars Recreation fee dollars are an investment The Tale of a Tall Tank in outdoor recreation. They support and enhance: The Buckboard water system is a full treatment system that • Public safety supplies potable water to the campground, boat ramp, marina, • Recreation site maintenance and and RV park. The water storage tank was in need of repairs and improvements maintenance such as new lower access hatch, an overflow • Educational experiences pipe, and repainting the structure to prevent corrosion. -
Golden Gate National Recreation Area Foundation Document Overview
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Foundation Document Overview Golden Gate National Recreation Area California Contact Information For more information about the Golden Gate National Recreation Area Foundation Document, contact: [email protected] or (415) 561-4700 or write to: Superintendent, Golden Gate National Recreation Area, Building 201, Fort Mason, San Francisco, CA 94123-0022 Description The Golden Gate Bridge, constructed in the 1930s, is the most recognizable landmark in the region. The bridge and its plaza receive millions of visitors annually. Situated at the northern tip of the San Francisco Peninsula, the Presidio has been part of Golden Gate National Recreation Area since 1994. For more than 200 years, the Presidio area was used as a military base, first by Spain in the late 1700s, briefly by Mexico in the 1800s, and by the United States from 1846 onward. Golden Gate National Recreation Area is widely known for its rich natural resources as well. The park helps protect parts of 19 separate ecosystems and numerous watersheds. It is also home to more than 1,250 plant and animal species, including many sensitive, rare, threatened, and endangered Golden Gate National Recreation Area is one of the largest species such as the mission blue butterfly, northern spotted urban parks in the world. The park’s extensive collection owl, and California red-legged frog. Golden Gate National of natural, historic, and scenic resources and diverse Recreation Area lands are also coastal preserves that recreational opportunities fulfill the purpose of bringing encompass many miles of bay and ocean shoreline. “parks to the people,” particularly to the 7 million people who live in the San Francisco Bay Area. -
Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 07/01/2008 to 09/30/2008 Clearwater National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 07/01/2008 to 09/30/2008 Clearwater National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring Nationwide National Forest System Land - Regulations, Directives, Completed Actual: 04/09/2008 04/2008 Gina Owens Management Planning - Orders 202-205-1187 Proposed Rule [email protected] EIS Description: The Agency proposes to publish a rule at 36 CFR part 219 to finish rulemaking on the land management planning rule issued on January 5, 2005 (2005 rule). The 2005 rule guides development, revision, and amendment of land management plans. Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/emc/nfma/2008_planning_rule.html Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - All units of the National Forest System. Agency-wide. Projects Occurring in more than one Region (excluding Nationwide) 07/01/2008 Page 1 of 10 Clearwater National Forest Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring in more than one Region (excluding Nationwide) Geothermal Leasing - Regulations, Directives, In Progress: Expected:12/2008 02/2009 Peter Gaulke Programmatic Environmental Orders DEIS NOA in Federal Register 703-605-4796 Impact Statement 06/13/2008 [email protected] EIS Est. FEIS NOA in Federal *NEW LISTING* Register 11/2008 Description: The Bureau of Land Management and Forest Service are preparing a joint Programmatic Environmental Impac Statement to analyze the leasing of BLM and USFS administered lands with moderate to high potential for geothermal resources in 11 western states. -
Wood River Area
Trail Report for the Sawtooth NRA **Early season expect snow above 8,000 feet high, high creek crossings and possible downed trees** Due to Covid 19 please be aware of closures, limits to number of people, and as always use leave no trace practices Wood River Area Maintained in Date Name Trail # Trail Segment Difficulty Distance Wilderness Area Hike, Bike, Motorized Description/Regulations Conditions, Hazards and General Notes on Trails 2020 Multi-use trail for hikers and bikers going from Sawtooth NRA to Galena 6/11/2020 Volunteers Harriman Easy 18 miles Hike and Bike Lodge; Interpretive signs along the trail; can be accessed along Hwy 75. Mountain Biked 9 miles up the trail. Easy- Hemingway-Boulders Hike, Bike only the 1st Wheelchair accessible for the first mile. Bicycles only allowed for the first 6/25/2020 210 Murdock Creek Moderate 7 miles RT Wilderness mile mile and then it becomes non-motorized in the wilderness area. Trail clear except for a few easily passible downed trees Hemingway-Boulders 127 East Fork North Fork Moderate 7 miles RT Wilderness Hike Moderate-rough road to trailhead. Hemingway-Boulders Drive to the end of the North Fork Road, hikes along the creak and 128 North Fork to Glassford Peak Moderate 4.5 Wilderness Hike through the trees, can go to West Pass or North Fork. North Fork Big Wood River/ West Moderate- Hemingway-Boulders Hike up to West Pass and connects with West Pass Creek on the East Fork Fallen tree suspended across trail is serious obstacle for horses one third mile 6/7/2020 Volunteers 115 Pass Difficult 6.3 Wilderness Hike of the Salmon River Road. -
Mt. Baker Ski Area
Winter Activity Guide Mount Baker Ranger District North Cascades National Park Contacts Get ready for winter adventure! Head east along the Mt. Baker Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest State Road Conditions: /Mt. Baker Ranger District Washington State Dept. of Transportation Highway to access National Forest 810 State Route 20 Dial 511 from within Washington State lands and the popular Mt. Baker Ski Sedro-Woolley, WA 98284 www.wsdot.wa.gov Area. Travel the picturesque North (360) 856-5700 ext. 515 Glacier Public Service Center Washington State Winter Recreation and Cascades Highway along the Skagit 10091 Mt. Baker Highway State Sno-Park Information: Wild & Scenic River System into the Glacier, WA 98244 www.parks.wa.gov/winter heart of the North Cascades. (360) 599-2714 http://www.fs.usda.gov/mbs Mt. Baker Ski Area Take some time for winter discovery but North Cascades National Park Service Ski Area Snow Report: be aware that terrain may be challenging Complex (360) 671-0211 to navigate at times. Mountain weather (360) 854-7200 www.mtbaker.us conditions can change dramatically and www.nps.gov/noca with little warning. Be prepared and check Cross-country ski & snowshoe trails along the Mt. Baker Highway: forecasts before heading out. National Weather Service www.weather.gov www.nooksacknordicskiclub.org Northwest Weather & Avalanche For eagle watching information visit: Travel Tips Center: Skagit River Bald Eagle Interpretive Center Mountain Weather Conditions www.skagiteagle.org • Prepare your vehicle for winter travel. www.nwac.us • Always carry tire chains and a shovel - practice putting tire chains on before you head out. -
BOISE NATIONAL FOREST Annual Report 2011
Boise National Forest 2011 Annual Report Boise Coalition members participate in a field trip to discuss Lower Clear Creek Watershed Project. Boise National Forest Moves Forward with Boise Coalition Recommended Project he Boise Forest Coalition, consisting of The Wildlife Conservation Strategy (WCS) priori- varied public and organizational interest tizes the types of activities that should be under- Coalition Primary representatives, met for nearly a year with taken to help maintain or restore habitat for wildlife Participants Lowman Ranger District staff to develop species in greatest need of conservation. The WCS a proposed suite of projects to remove culverts and also identifies where these actions are most needed. T Wilderness Society roads, build trails, cut timber and burn the forest un- For example, thinning smaller trees and connecting der controlled conditions within the Lowman Clear habitat areas will likely provide suitable habitat for Woody Biomass Creek watershed. woodpeckers, owls and elk. Utilization Initiative They presented their proposal to Boise National Thinning and controlled burning is proposed on Trout Unlimited Forest staff this summer having built an atmosphere about 1,000 acres for habitat restoration, another Common Ground of trust and better understanding of management 250 acres for protection of summer homes and pri- Southwest Idaho Mountain options through excellent dialogue, facilitated by vate lands, and another 700 acres to maintain forest Biking Association Common Ground. conditions. Controlled burns are also recommended, Long Creek Summer after some advance treatments, on about 700 acres. In November, the Lowman Ranger District initiated Home Owners an environmental review for the Lower Clear Creek A new 15-mile mountain bike trail along Miller Boise Cascade Watershed Project with a proposal to manage 2,650 Mountain ridge and leading into Clear Creek is also Wood Products LLC acres.