DOCSLIB.ORG

Obelisks of Wadjet Hall

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Obelisks of Wadjet Hall Obelisks of Wadjet Hall Originally built by Hatshepsut - 1479 BCE to 1458 BCE Modified by Thutmose III - 1479 BCE to 1425 BCE Other works initiated by Hatshepsut: Obelisks of Festival Hall West Pair, Palace of Ma’at, 8th Pylon, Amenhotep I Calcite Chapel, Obelisks at Contra Temple, Wadjet Hall, Red Chapel, Pylon and Festival Court of Thutmose II Other works initiated by Thutmose III: Akhmenu, Contra Temple, Wadjet Hall, 7th Pylon, Thutmose III Shrine, Enclosures and Gates, Sacred Lake, 6th Pylon and Court, 5th Pylon and Court, Obelisks of 7th Pylon, Station of the King and Corridor, Obelisks of Festival Hall Center Pair, Central Bark Shrine, Palace of Ma’at, Pylon and Festival Court of Thutmose II, East Exterior Wall Other obelisks: Obelisk Unique, Obelisks at Contra Temple, Obelisks at Eastern Gate, Obelisks of Festival Hall Center Pair, Obelisks of Festival Hall East Pair, Obelisks of Festival Hall West Pair, Obelisks of 7th Pylon Introduction The obelisks of Hatshepsut originally stood in the Wadjet hall. The southern obelisk has fallen, but its upper section is on display near the sacred lake. The Photographs of Obelisks of Wadjet Hall. northern obelisk still graces the temple today. Measurements: The northern obelisk stands 30m high. The southern obelisk (now fallen) would have stood to the same height. Phase: Hatshepsut Hatshepsut raised her obelisks in the Wadjet Hall as part of a larger series of renovations to this area, including the erection of wooden papyri-form pillars and a wooden roof. She commemorates the addition of these obelisks to the temple on her red quartzite bark shrine, the “red chapel.” Inscriptions on these monoliths recorded the celebration of her jubilee festival in her 16th regnal year. The obelisks were covered with small scenes of the queen (depicted as a male pharaoh) making offerings to the gods. Rendering of Obelisks of Wadjet Hall Construction materials: rose granite under the reign of Hatshepsut. Obelisks of Wadjet Hall About the reconstruction model of this phase The obelisks on the model were based on the axial drawings of the hall by Carlotti and Gabolde (2003: fig. 10a-b) and photographs of the standing obelisk at Karnak today. The four sides of the standing obelisk were photographed at the temple and placed onto the model, respecting their existing orientation. Photographs of two sides of the tip of the southern obelisk (the north and south face) were added to the model as well. They were placed Rendering of one of the Obelisks according to the direction each scene faces as the monument is of Wadjet Hall under the reign of situated at the sacred lake. A line drawing of a third side (the west face) Hatshepsut. published in Bell (2002: Abb. 3) was traced and reworked to recreate a third side of the monument. The glyphs and granite underlay were adjusted to try and make this area match that of the two photographed sides. The missing lower portion of the obelisk was replaced with a generic rose granite texture. Phase: Thutmose III Thutmose III erected a new gateway within the hall, enclosing the bases of the obelisks in its stone jambs. To the portions of the obelisks still visible above the gateway, the king added new lines of text alongside those of the queen. It should be noted that a new analysis of the chronology of the Wadjet Hall has hypothesized that the queen may have enclosed the obelisks herself. Construction materials: limestone About the reconstruction model of this phase The new gateway and the appearance of the obelisks after their enclosure was based on the plans and axial drawings of the hall by Carlotti and Gabolde (2003: fig. 11a-b). Bibliography and Sources Used for Model Construction Bell, Lanny (2002), “Divine kingship and the theology of the obelisk cult in Renderings of the Obelisks of Wadjet the temples of Thebes,” in Ägyptologische Tempeltagung : Würzburg, 23.-26. Hall during the reign of Thutmose III. September 1999, vol. 5. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 17-46. Carlotti, Jean-François and Luc Gabolde (2003), “Nouvelles données sur la Ouadjyt.” Cahiers de Karnak, vol. XI. Sullivan 2008, Obelisks of Wadjet Hall. Digital Karnak. 2 Obelisks of Wadjet Hall Further reading Dondelinger, Edmund (1977), Der Obelisk : ein Steinmal ägyptischer Weltanschauung. Graz: Akademische Druck- u. Verlagsanstalt. Golvin, Jean-Claude (1993), “Hatchepsout et les obelisques de Karnak,” in Hatchepsout: femme pharaon. Dijon: Editions Faton. Habachi, Labib and Charles Van Siclen (1977), The obelisks of Egypt: skyscrapers of the past. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press. © 2008 All rights reserved. Sullivan 2008, Obelisks of Wadjet Hall. Digital Karnak. 3 Regents of the University of California..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • JIIA.Eu Journal of Intercultural and Interdisciplinary Archaeology Isis-Thermouthis and the Anguiform Deities in Egypt: a Cultural and Semantic Evolution M
    JIIA.eu Journal of Intercultural and Interdisciplinary Archaeology Isis-Thermouthis and the anguiform deities in Egypt: a cultural and semantic evolution M. Franci CAMNES, Firenze The snake, for its primeval power and chthonic life, has always had a central but ambivalent role, in Egypt as well as in the Ancient Near Eastern world. Here the semantic field of the serpent is mainly negative: just for example, the god Mot, the deification of the death, can also appear as a serpent;1 the world äl-mā-yuḏkar “snake” in the semitic dialect of Sana means “the one who is not named” is a clear evidence of a linguistic taboo; and the Common Semitic word NAḤAŠ “snake” was related with the meaning “prophecy” and “exorcist formula”.2 From the reading of the Egyptian documents and representations on the tomb and temple’s walls it is clear that in Egypt the symbolic significance of the snake figure was intimately considered powerful and productive during all the Egyptian history. It was used to express different and wide meanings – political, religious, philosophical – because in Egypt the snake could be also seen, at the same time, as an evil and dangerous entity (Apophis above all), as a protective deity (the goddess Wadjet, for example): one can easily find in the Pyramid Texts a long list of serpents, as evil entity e.g. the hpnwi-snake, as protective entity, e.g. the ḏnn-serpent, a clear evidence of an interesting quantity of more ancient myths that merged in the Corpus of the Pyramid Texts. The example of the snake-god Nehebkaw is paradigmatic: in the Utterance 229 the god Atum pressing down on the vertebrae of this serpent have stilled the turmoil in Heliopolis; but in the utterance 510 the deceased king is identified with Nehebkaw.3 A double meaning that had been created, doubtless, by the natural relationship of the snake with the creative process, generating a continuous contradiction, for a modern point of view.
    [Show full text]
  • YERBILIMLERI Bulletin for Earth Sciences
    YERBILIMLERI Bulletin for Earth Sciences ISSN: 2687 - 2978 Yerbilimleri, 2020, 41 (2), 169-182, DOI:10.17824/yerbilimleri.630560 Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yerbilimleri Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi Bülteni Bulletin of the Earth Sciences Application and Research Centre of Hacettepe University Structural evaluation for the preservation of an ancient Egyptian Obelisk in Istanbul, Turkey Istanbul’da eski bir Mısır dikilitaşının koruma amaçlı yapısal değerlendirilmesi GÜLTEN POLAT *1, ÖZDEN SAYGILI 1 1 Department of Civil Engineering, Yeditepe University, Istanbul, Turkey Geliş (received): 4 Ekim (October) 2019 Kabul (accepted) : 10 Ağustos (August) 2020 ABSTRACT The "Obelisk of Theodosius" is one of the most important monuments located in the former Hippodrome in Istanbul, Turkey. The Obelisk with its sculpted base is 24.77 meters in height today, but historical recordings indicate that it was evidently higher originally. Additionally, the recordings show that some of the parts were left behind in Egypt due to transportation. The Obelisk has been exposed to many natural devastating events, particularly strong earthquakes. The monument is in a seismically very active region, Istanbul, located near one of the most devastating active faults of Turkey, the North Anatolian Fault. For the preservation of this obelisk, it is important to evaluate its seismic performance. For this purpose, in this study, the structural dynamic characteristics and the response of the obelisk were investigated. To achieve this aim, a numerical model was created using a finite element approach. In addition to this, real ground motion data were analyzed in this study. The most important finding of the study is that although the obelisk had experienced devastating earthquakes for a long time, revealed deformation is not noticeable.
    [Show full text]
  • Catch a Falling Obelisk
    Catch a Falling Obelisk Mark Barahman, Dan Feldman, Jeremy Lyons, & Michelle Plastrik MHC 3: Science and Technology of New York City, Fall 2009 Professor: Sophia Perdikaris Technical Advisor: Gregory Donovan Abstract The future of the ancient world is at a crossroads, for polluon and climate threaten the preservaon of anquies. This global problem can be found in our own backyard, New York City, where the Egypan obelisk is slowly deteriorang, as is its twin in London. Our project sheds light on the dangers facing monumental works of art and the technology being used to stop the ravages of me and polluon. To compare the condions of the obelisks, and invesgate corrosion mechanisms of granite, we studied atmospheric composion in terms of air‐borne molecules and chemicals, data about weather and precipitaon, and the impact of organisms on exposed granite. We invesgated past and present preservaon methods, and evaluated what must be done in the future to best maintain the obelisks. We idenfied which preservaon techniques are most effecve in protecng the obelisks, and determined the efficiency of these methods. London Obelisk A Brief History (6) •The New York and London Egypan obelisks, known popularly as Cleopatra’s Needles, are twins (2) New York Obelisk •Both were created in the Egypan city Heliopolis around 1500 BCE and later stood in Alexandria (2) (5) •In 1801 the Egypan government presented one of these obelisks to the Brish (9) •It was finally erected in London in 1878, aer a hazardous journey by sea (2) •Later in the 19th century Egypt gave
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating the Revival of Ancient Egyptian Artifacts As a Symbol of Power Through Their Occupation of European Public Spaces: a Chrono-Morphological Study
    Athens Journal of Mediterranean Studies - Volume 7, Issue 3, July 2021 – Pages 187-200 Investigating the Revival of Ancient Egyptian Artifacts as a Symbol of Power through their Occupation of European Public Spaces: A Chrono-Morphological Study By Mohamed Raslan*, István Bartók± & Zoltán Szécsi Numerous architectural styles have been explored in recent years (Pakkanen 2018). However, Egyptian revival did not obtain the consideration it deserved till lately, when there was a remarkable flow of attention coursed by various significant ancient Egyptian exhibitions all over the world, which led to the publications of books and articles tackling the Egyptian revival (Curl 2013). In this paper the researcher will try to investigate the chronological change of form and shape of ancient Egyptian architectural features that were revived in European public spaces to signify power, sovereignty, and authority. Curl (2013) charts the argument of the persistence of Egyptian motifs in design from Greco- Roman Antiquity, through the Mediaeval, Baroque, and Neo-Classical periods. Our hypothesis is that Ancient Egypt is a central source, rather than peripheral, to the development of considerable volume of European urbanistic and architectural features. We will distinguish manifestations with Egyptian connotations based on literature reviewed, field observation and the methodology of Curl (2013). Aiming only on three ancient Egyptian sources, the Sphinx, the obelisk, and the temple. Keywords: Egyptian revival, Ancient Egyptian artifacts, morphological regeneration, space occupation, public spaces Introduction The civilization of the West that progressed from the Greco-Roman realm, later from the intricate organization of the Christian Church and its direct connections with secular power and the legitimizing of that power, depicted profoundly on the religion of Ancient Egypt and the authority given to religion people of the Pharaoh, a statement that is often overlooked, or proclaimed as ‘extravagant’ by reviewers (Curl 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Obelisks at 7Th Pylon
    Obelisks at 7th Pylon Originally built by Thutmose III - 1479 BCE to 1425 BCE Other works initiated by Thutmose III: Akhmenu, Contra Temple, Wadjet Hall, 7th Pylon, Thutmose III Shrine, Enclosures and Gates, Sacred Lake, 6th Pylon and Court, 5th Pylon and Court, Station of the King and Corridor, Obelisks of Festival Hall Center Pair, Central Bark Shrine, Palace of Ma’at, Obelisks of Wadjet Hall, Pylon and Festival Court of Thutmose II, East Exterior Wall Other obelisks: Obelisk Unique, Obelisks at Contra Temple, Obelisks at Eastern Gate, Obelisks of Festival Hall Center Pair, Obelisks of Festival Hall East Pair, Obelisks of Festival Hall West Pair, Obelisks of Wadjet Hall Introduction These obelisks originally stood to the south of pylon 7. The western obelisk was removed by a Roman emperor (possibly Constantius) in the 4th century CE and eventually sent to Constantinople, the capital of the Roman Empire in the east, present day Istanbul, Turkey. It now adorns the Hippodrome. The tip of the second obelisk was recovered at Karnak. Measurements: The obelisk in Istanbul measures 20m, but only its upper portion survives. It would have originally stood almost 29m, not including a base of more than 1m. Phase: Thutmose III Thutmose III erected these obelisks in front of his new pylon entrance along the temple’s north/south processional route (the seventh pylon). Interestingly, while only the upper portion of this obelisk survives, its inscription is very similar to an obelisk depicted in a relief scene of Thutmose III. Its full size and text has been hypothesized based on this image.
    [Show full text]
  • The Deity Shemaa-Nefer “Sma Nfr” at Esna Temple Mofida El-Weshahy1 and Noha Mohamed Hafez2 Faculty of Tourism and Hotels, Suez Canal University
    Mofida El-Weshahy and Noha Hafez (JAAUTH), Vol. 17 No. 2, 2019, pp. 15-31. The Deity Shemaa-nefer “Sma nfr” at Esna Temple Mofida El-Weshahy1 and Noha Mohamed Hafez2 Faculty of Tourism and Hotels, Suez Canal University. ARTICLE INFO Abstract Shemaa-nefer is the crocodile god who was mentioned at Esna temple Keywords: as “the son of goddess Neith”. His name means “the long and the good Shemaa-nefer; god” which agrees with the main figure of the god more than “the crocodile; Esna; Southern beautiful”. Shemaa-nefer was not only sacred at Upper Egypt. Neith. His name was found among the deities’ names “Semenouphis, Samanouphis” in some of the Greek texts from the 2nd and 3rd centuries. (JAAUTH) His name appeared on one of the papyrus which was found at Vol. 17, No. 2, Elephantine. Another papyrus found at Esna mentioned the deity’s (2019), name, but it is now in Chicago1. This research aims to; (1) shed light on PP. 15 -31. the deity Shemaa-nefer; (2) study the role of Shemaa-nefer at Esna; (3) study the relationship of Shemaa-nefer with the other deities. Introduction Esna tA-snj 2, iwnjt 3 is located on the West bank of the Nile, 64 km south of Luxor. This site was an important cultural center during the Ptolemaic period4. The temple of Esna dates to Ptolemaic and Roman times and was one of the last Egyptian temples erected in Egypt. It was dedicated to god Khnum along with other deities such as Mehet5, Menhyt6, Tefnut7, Sekhmet8, Nebtu, Neith9 and Heka10,11.The temple was built during the reign of Ptolemy VI Philometor and completed under Decius whose inscriptions included the last hieroglyphs sculpted in ancient Egypt12.
    [Show full text]
  • Statuette of a Snake-Legged Anubis in the National Museum, Warsaw 214 ALEKSANDRA MAJEWSKA
    INSTITUT DES CULTURES MÉDITERRANÉENNES ET ORIENTALES DE L’ACADÉMIE POLONAISE DES SCIENCES ÉTUDES et TRAVAUX XXV 2012 ALEKSANDRA MAJEWSKA Statuette of a Snake-legged Anubis in the National Museum, Warsaw 214 ALEKSANDRA MAJEWSKA Among the images of Egyptian gods on display in the gallery of Ancient Egyptian Art at the National Museum in Warsaw there is an exceptional fi gurine of bronze with a jackal’s head, torso of a man and serpentine coils instead of legs. It is undoubtedly a representa- tion of Anubis, but suffi ciently unique to merit a broader commentary than the brief notes published on its subject so far.1 The iconographic and stylistic distinctness with regard to canonical representations of Anubis in Egyptian art indicate a background in the artistic production of an age in which a native tradition coexisted with Graeco-Roman culture. The Anubis statuette from the Warsaw National Museum is of composite form.2 It is made up of three independent elements: jackal’s head, male upper body and serpentine coils (Figs 1–4). The relatively small head features a long narrow snout. Set in deep sockets, the large slanting eyes with marked pupils look attentively to the front. Curly wisps of fur encircle the snout and neck, joining the tripartite wig to form a hairdo that skillfully softens the animality of the head. Preserved between the fl eshy ears of natural shape is the base of the broken crown. The harmoniously built male torso is characterized by ample pectoral muscles passing into a narrowed waist and softly modeled, slightly rounded abdominal muscles with a distinctly sunk navel.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpretation of the Function of the Obelisk of Augustus in Rome from Antique Texts to Present Time Virtual Reconstruction
    The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XLII-2/W11, 2019 GEORES 2019 – 2nd International Conference of Geomatics and Restoration, 8–10 May 2019, Milan, Italy INTERPRETATION OF THE FUNCTION OF THE OBELISK OF AUGUSTUS IN ROME FROM ANTIQUE TEXTS TO PRESENT TIME VIRTUAL RECONSTRUCTION M. Hiermanseder Hietzing Consult, Vienna, Austria - [email protected] KEY WORDS: Astronomy, Line of Meridian, Historical Texts, Archeology, Simulation, Virtual World Heritage ABSTRACT: About the astronomical use of the obelisk of Augustus on Campo Marzio in Rome, which has already been described by Pliny, well known astronomers and mathematicians like Euler, Marinoni or Poleni have given their expert opinion immediately after it's unearthing in 1748. With the prevailing opinion, based on a brief chapter in "Historia naturalis", it would constitute a line of meridian rather than a sundial, the question had been decided for more than 200 years. In 1976, however, the prominent German archeologist Edmund Buchner established once more the assumption, that the obelisk has been part of a gigantic sundial for the apotheosis of the emperor Augustus. Excavations of the German Archeological Institute in 1980/81, which brought to light parts of the inscriptions of the scale, were taken as a proof of his theory by Buchner. Since 1990 works by physicists and experts for chronometry like Schütz, Maes, Auber, et.al., established the interpretation as a line of meridian. Recent measurements and virtual reconstructions of the antique situation in 2013 provide valid evidence for this argument as well. The different approach to the problem mirrors the antagonism between interpretation of antique texts and the assessment of archeological findings in the light of far fledged historical hypotheses.
    [Show full text]
  • Obelisk Article.3-4
    NEW ORLEANS NOSTALGIA Remembering New Orleans History, Culture and Traditions By Ned Hémard The Obelisk with the Odd Inscription Obelisks are tall, four-sided tapering monuments which are crowned by a pyramid-like shape at their peaks. These Egyptian monoliths became popular during the Enlightenment and connected with the mortuary arts as symbols of timelessness and memorialization. When it comes to obelisks, Americans immediately think of the Washington Monument in Washington, D. C. New Orleanians recall the Egyptian obelisk known as the Chalmette Monument (in Chalmette, Louisiana) rising 100 feet 2 ½ inches above the ground upon which the Battle of New Orleans was fought in 1815. Then there are cenotaphs. They look like tombs but are actually monuments erected in honor of a person (or persons) whose remains lie elsewhere. The word comes from the Greek kenos, one meaning being “empty”, and taphos for “tomb”. Oftentimes this is the result of their bodies not being found. Such was the case with architect James Gallier, Sr., and his wife. In St. Louis Cemetery #3, one can find an impressive cenotaph erected by James Gallier, Jr., to the memory of his father and stepmother who both perished when the “Evening Star” was sunk during a hurricane off the coast of Georgia on the morning of October 3, 1866. Because of its past history as a racecourse, Eberhard Deutsch has written of Metairie Cemetery’s “sardonic characterization as a haven for the quick and the dead”. It is also the New Orleans location for a monument that is both an obelisk and a cenotaph, with a most unusual inscription.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy, Topography and Dynastic History in the Age of the Pyramids
    Astronomy, topography and dynastic history in the Age of the Pyramids. Giulio Magli Faculty of Civil Architecture - Politecnico di Milano Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milan, Italy It is known since the 19 century that in the layout of the pyramid field of the pharaohs of the 4 th Egyptian dynasty at Giza, a “main axis” exists. Indeed, the south-east corners of these monuments align towards the site of the temple of Heliopolis, which was plainly visible in ancient times. It was later discovered that a similar situation occurs in the main pyramid field of the subsequent dynasty at Abu Sir. Here, the north-west corners of three chronologically successive pyramids again voluntarily align towards Heliopolis. However, the temple was in this case not visible, due to the rock outcrop- today occupied by the Cairo citadel - which blocks the view. In the present paper, a multi-disciplinary approach based on historical, topographical and archaeoastronomical analysis is developed in an attempt at understanding this peculiar feature, which governed from the very beginning the planning of such wonderful monuments. A general pattern actually arises, which appears to have inspired the choice of the sites and the disposition on the ground of almost all the funerary complexes of the kings during the Old Kingdom. 1. Introduction An interesting feature exists in the layouts of the pyramids of Giza and Abu Sir: the presence of a “main axis” directed to the area where the ancient temple of the sun of Heliopolis once stood, on the opposite bank of the Nile. These axes are connected with a process of “solarisation” of the pharaoh which probably started with Khufu, the builder of the Great Pyramid.
    [Show full text]
  • The Black Obelisk of Shalmaneser III
    The Black Obelisk of Shalmaneser III DESCRIPTION Akkadian Language: (Neo-Assyrian) Medium: black limestone 4 panels Size: 2.02 meters high Text length: 190 lines + 5 captions Approximate Date of Obelisk: 827 BCE Approximate Date of Jehu's Tribute: 841 BCE Dates of Shalmaneser III's reign: 858–824 BCE Date of Discovery: 1846 ancient Kalhu/Calah Place of Discovery: (modern Nimrud, Iraq) Excavator: Austen Henry Layard (1817-1894) Current Location: British Museum BM WAA 118885 Inventory Number: (BM = British Museum; WAA = Western Asiastic Antiquities) TRANSLATION (Adapted from Luckenbill 1926:200-211) (1-21) Assur, the great lord, king of all the great gods; Anu, king of the Igigi and Anunnaki, the lord of lands; Enlil, the exalted, father of the gods, the creator; Ea, king of the Deep, who determines destiny; Sin, king of the tiara, exalted in splendor; Adad, mighty, pre-eminent, lord of abundance; Shamash, judge of heaven and earth, director of all; Marduk, master of the gods, lord of law; Urta, valiant one of the Igigi and the Anunnaki, the almighty god; Nergal, the ready, king of battle; Nusku, bearer of the shining scepter, the god who renders decisions; Ninlil, spouse of Bêl, mother of the great gods; Ishtar, lady of conflict and battle, whose delight is warfare, great gods, who love my kingship, who have made great my rule, power, and sway, who have established for me an honored, an exalted name, far above that of all other lords! Shalmaneser, king of all peoples, lord, priest of Assur, mighty king, king of all the four regions, Sun of all peoples, despot of all lands; son of Assur-nâsir-pal, the high priest, whose priesthood was acceptable to the gods and who brought in submission at his feet the totality of the countries; glorious offspring of Tukulti-Urta, who slew all of his foes and overwhelmed them like a deluge.
    [Show full text]
  • MICHAEL POE ANCIENT EGYPTIAN METAPHYSICS Many Requests For
    MICHAEL POE ANCIENT EGYPTIAN METAPHYSICS Many requests for me to do some teaching (largely from a book that I am now writing on ancient Egyptian Metaphysics and Personal Worship) about metaphysics, worship and the ancient Egyptian traditions. To start off, I want to briefly quote some ancient Egyptian philosophers to give you the gist of ancient Egyptian philosophy and Metaphysics. The next note I enter will be on general comments on ancient Egyptian metaphysics. The material I will use is NOT from Masonic or Rosecrucian but from authentic Egyptian sources. In many cases I can quote the exact sources, most are translations of papyrus, temples, tombs, etc. Having studied the subject for 33 years, gotten a degree on the subject, and working on the book for 10 years, I will pass on some of what I have learned. All of the translations are from Egyptologists and Archaeologists. To quote an old Egyptian philosopher (found written on his tomb), Ptah hotep : "To give a few words of Truth, And what you make of Them will be your Test." From the College of Priests House of the Temple of Horus at Edfu: "The Lamp of Wisdom burns steadily, If the soil that feeds it be reality. If the oil that feeds the lamp be Love, The beloved will meet the Lord or Lady and be blessed. (Lord or Lady means personal God or Goddess, ed.) If the air that feeds the Flame be Truth, The Breath of He who breathes will inhale Wisdom. If the Spirit enters the Flame, The Fire will be as bright as a Star." Next little lesson; what is a hymn when I mention one or quote one (which I will from time to time)? The hymns of Egypt tell of the nature and workings of the God/-dess they glorify.
    [Show full text]