4.6 Raman Spectroscopy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Glossary Physics (I-Introduction)
1 Glossary Physics (I-introduction) - Efficiency: The percent of the work put into a machine that is converted into useful work output; = work done / energy used [-]. = eta In machines: The work output of any machine cannot exceed the work input (<=100%); in an ideal machine, where no energy is transformed into heat: work(input) = work(output), =100%. Energy: The property of a system that enables it to do work. Conservation o. E.: Energy cannot be created or destroyed; it may be transformed from one form into another, but the total amount of energy never changes. Equilibrium: The state of an object when not acted upon by a net force or net torque; an object in equilibrium may be at rest or moving at uniform velocity - not accelerating. Mechanical E.: The state of an object or system of objects for which any impressed forces cancels to zero and no acceleration occurs. Dynamic E.: Object is moving without experiencing acceleration. Static E.: Object is at rest.F Force: The influence that can cause an object to be accelerated or retarded; is always in the direction of the net force, hence a vector quantity; the four elementary forces are: Electromagnetic F.: Is an attraction or repulsion G, gravit. const.6.672E-11[Nm2/kg2] between electric charges: d, distance [m] 2 2 2 2 F = 1/(40) (q1q2/d ) [(CC/m )(Nm /C )] = [N] m,M, mass [kg] Gravitational F.: Is a mutual attraction between all masses: q, charge [As] [C] 2 2 2 2 F = GmM/d [Nm /kg kg 1/m ] = [N] 0, dielectric constant Strong F.: (nuclear force) Acts within the nuclei of atoms: 8.854E-12 [C2/Nm2] [F/m] 2 2 2 2 2 F = 1/(40) (e /d ) [(CC/m )(Nm /C )] = [N] , 3.14 [-] Weak F.: Manifests itself in special reactions among elementary e, 1.60210 E-19 [As] [C] particles, such as the reaction that occur in radioactive decay. -
A Comparison of Ultraviolet and Visible Raman Spectra of Supported Metal Oxide Catalysts
8600 J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 8600-8606 A Comparison of Ultraviolet and Visible Raman Spectra of Supported Metal Oxide Catalysts Yek Tann Chua,† Peter C. Stair,*,† and Israel E. Wachs*,‡ Department of Chemistry, Center for Catalysis and Surface Science and Institute of EnVironmental Catalysis, Northwestern UniVersity, EVanston, Illinois 60208, and Zettlemoyer Center for Surface Studies and Department of Chemical Engineering, Lehigh UniVersity, Bethlehem, PennsylVania 18015 ReceiVed: April 11, 2001 The recent emergence of ultraviolet-wavelength-excited Raman spectroscopy as a tool for catalyst characterization has motivated the question of how UV Raman spectra compare to visible-wavelength-excited Raman spectra on the same catalyst system. Measurements of Raman spectra from five supported metal oxide systems (Al2O3-supported Cr2O3,V2O5, and MoO3 as well as TiO2-supported MoO3 and Re2O7), using visible (514.5 nm) and ultraviolet (244 nm) wavelength excitation have been compared to determine the similarities and differences in Raman spectra produced at the two wavelengths. The samples were in the form of self-supporting disks. Spectra from the oxides, both hydrated as a result of contact with ambient air and dehydrated as a result of calcination or laser-induced heating, were recorded. A combination of sample spinning and translation to produce a spiral pattern of laser beam exposure to the catalyst disk was found to be most effective in minimizing dehydration caused by laser-induced heating. Strong absorption by the samples in the ultraviolet significantly reduced the number of scatterers contributing to the Raman spectrum while producing only modest increases in the Raman scattering cross section due to resonance enhancement. -
Atomic and Molecular Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy of Selected Pharmaceuticals
Article Atomic and Molecular Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy of Selected Pharmaceuticals Pravin Kumar Tiwari 1,2, Nilesh Kumar Rai 3, Rohit Kumar 3, Christian G. Parigger 4 and Awadhesh Kumar Rai 2,* 1 Institute for Plasma Research, Gandhinagar, Gujarat-382428, India 2 Laser Spectroscopy Research Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Allahabad, Prayagraj-211002, India 3 CMP Degree College, Department of Physics, University of Allahabad, Pragyagraj-211002, India 4 Physics and Astronomy Department, University of Tennessee, University of Tennessee Space Institute, Center for Laser Applications, 411 B.H. Goethert Parkway, Tullahoma, TN 37388-9700, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +91-532-2460993 Received: 10 June 2019; Accepted: 10 July 2019; Published: 19 July 2019 Abstract: Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) of pharmaceutical drugs that contain paracetamol was investigated in air and argon atmospheres. The characteristic neutral and ionic spectral lines of various elements and molecular signatures of CN violet and C2 Swan band systems were observed. The relative hardness of all drug samples was measured as well. Principal component analysis, a multivariate method, was applied in the data analysis for demarcation purposes of the drug samples. The CN violet and C2 Swan spectral radiances were investigated for evaluation of a possible correlation of the chemical and molecular structures of the pharmaceuticals. Complementary Raman and Fourier-transform-infrared spectroscopies were used to record the molecular spectra of the drug samples. The application of the above techniques for drug screening are important for the identification and mitigation of drugs that contain additives that may cause adverse side-effects. Keywords: paracetamol; laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy; cyanide; carbon swan bands; principal component analysis; Raman spectroscopy; Fourier-transform-infrared spectroscopy 1. -
Laser Raman Spectroscopy As a Technique for Identification Of
ARTICLE IN PRESS CHEMGE-15589; No of Pages 13 Chemical Geology xxx (2008) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Chemical Geology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/chemgeo Laser Raman spectroscopy as a technique for identification of seafloor hydrothermal and cold seep minerals Sheri N. White ⁎ Department of Applied Ocean Physics and Engineering, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02536, USA article info abstract Article history: In situ sensors capable of real-time measurements and analyses in the deep ocean are necessary to fulfill the Received 8 August 2008 potential created by the development of autonomous, deep-sea platforms such as autonomous and remotely Received in revised form 8 November 2008 operated vehicles, and cabled observatories. Laser Raman spectroscopy (a type of vibrational spectroscopy) is an Accepted 10 November 2008 optical technique that is capable of in situ molecular identification of minerals in the deep ocean. The goals of this Available online xxxx work are to determine the characteristic spectral bands and relative Raman scattering strength of hydrothermally- Editor: R.L. Rudnick and cold seep-relevant minerals, and to determine how the quality of the spectra are affected by changes in excitation wavelength and sampling optics. The information learned from this work will lead to the development Keywords: of new, smaller sea-going Raman instruments that are optimized to analyze minerals in the deep ocean. Raman spectroscopy Many minerals of interest at seafloor hydrothermal and cold seep sites are Raman active, such as elemental sulfur, Mineralogy carbonates, sulfates and sulfides. Elemental S8 sulfur is a strong Raman scatterer with dominant bands at ∼219 and Hydrothermal vents 472 Δcm−1. -
12 Light Scattering AQ1
12 Light Scattering AQ1 Lev T. Perelman CONTENTS 12.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 321 12.2 Basic Principles of Light Scattering ....................................................................................323 12.3 Light Scattering Spectroscopy ............................................................................................325 12.4 Early Cancer Detection with Light Scattering Spectroscopy .............................................326 12.5 Confocal Light Absorption and Scattering Spectroscopic Microscopy ............................. 329 12.6 Light Scattering Spectroscopy of Single Nanoparticles ..................................................... 333 12.7 Conclusions ......................................................................................................................... 335 Acknowledgment ........................................................................................................................... 335 References ...................................................................................................................................... 335 12.1 INTRODUCTION Light scattering in biological tissues originates from the tissue inhomogeneities such as cellular organelles, extracellular matrix, blood vessels, etc. This often translates into unique angular, polari- zation, and spectroscopic features of scattered light emerging from tissue and therefore information about tissue -
Solutions 7: Interacting Quantum Field Theory: Λφ4
QFT PS7 Solutions: Interacting Quantum Field Theory: λφ4 (4/1/19) 1 Solutions 7: Interacting Quantum Field Theory: λφ4 Matrix Elements vs. Green Functions. Physical quantities in QFT are derived from matrix elements M which represent probability amplitudes. Since particles are characterised by having a certain three momentum and a mass, and hence a specified energy, we specify such physical calculations in terms of such \on-shell" values i.e. four-momenta where p2 = m2. For instance the notation in momentum space for a ! scattering in scalar Yukawa theory uses four-momenta labels p1 and p2 flowing into the diagram for initial states, with q1 and q2 flowing out of the diagram for the final states, all of which are on-shell. However most manipulations in QFT, and in particular in this problem sheet, work with Green func- tions not matrix elements. Green functions are defined for arbitrary values of four momenta including unphysical off-shell values where p2 6= m2. So much of the information encoded in a Green function has no obvious physical meaning. Of course to extract the corresponding physical matrix element from the Greens function we would have to apply such physical constraints in order to get the physics of scattering of real physical particles. Alternatively our Green function may be part of an analysis of a much bigger diagram so it represents contributions from virtual particles to some more complicated physical process. ∗1. The full propagator in λφ4 theory Consider a theory of a real scalar field φ 1 1 λ L = (@ φ)(@µφ) − m2φ2 − φ4 (1) 2 µ 2 4! (i) A theory with a gφ3=(3!) interaction term will not have an energy which is bounded below. -
Accessing Excited State Molecular Vibrations by Femtosecond Stimulated Raman Spectroscopy
Accessing Excited State Molecular Vibrations by Femtosecond Stimulated Raman Spectroscopy Giovanni Batignani,y Carino Ferrante,y,z and Tullio Scopigno∗,y,z yDipartimento di Fisica, Universitá di Roma “La Sapienza", Roma, I-00185, Italy z Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Center for Life Nano Science @Sapienza, Roma, I-00161, Italy E-mail: [email protected] arXiv:2010.05029v1 [physics.optics] 10 Oct 2020 1 Abstract Excited-state vibrations are crucial for determining photophysical and photochem- ical properties of molecular compounds. Stimulated Raman scattering can coherently stimulate and probe molecular vibrations with optical pulses, but it is generally re- stricted to ground state properties. Working in resonance conditions, indeed, enables cross-section enhancement and selective excitation to a targeted electronic level, but is hampered by an increased signal complexity due to the presence of overlapping spectral contributions. Here, we show how detailed information on ground and excited state vi- brations can be disentangled, by exploiting the relative time delay between Raman and probe pulses to control the excited state population, combined with a diagrammatic formalism to dissect the pathways concurring to the signal generation. The proposed method is then exploited to elucidate the vibrational properties of ground and excited electronic states in the paradigmatic case of Cresyl Violet. We anticipate that the presented approach holds the potential for selective mapping the reaction coordinates pertaining to transient electronic stages implied in photo-active compounds. Graphical TOC Entry 2 Raman spectroscopy is a powerful tool to access the vibrational fingerprints of molecules or solid state compounds and it can be used to extract structural and dynamical information of the samples under investigation. -
Combining Chemical Information from Grass Pollen in Multimodal Characterization
ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 31 January 2020 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01788 Combining Chemical Information From Grass Pollen in Multimodal Characterization Sabrina Diehn 1,2, Boris Zimmermann 3, Valeria Tafintseva 3, Stephan Seifert 1,2, Murat Bag˘ cıog˘ lu 3, Mikael Ohlson 4, Steffen Weidner 2, Siri Fjellheim 5, Achim Kohler 3,6 and Janina Kneipp 1,2* 1 Department of Chemistry, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 2 BAM Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, Berlin, Germany, 3 Faculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway, 4 Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway, 5 Faculty of Biosciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway, 6 Nofima AS, Ås, Norway Edited by: Lisbeth Garbrecht Thygesen, fi University of Copenhagen, The analysis of pollen chemical composition is important to many elds, including Denmark agriculture, plant physiology, ecology, allergology, and climate studies. Here, the Reviewed by: potential of a combination of different spectroscopic and spectrometric methods Wesley Toby Fraser, regarding the characterization of small biochemical differences between pollen samples Oxford Brookes University, United Kingdom was evaluated using multivariate statistical approaches. Pollen samples, collected from Åsmund Rinnan, three populations of the grass Poa alpina, were analyzed using Fourier-transform infrared University of Copenhagen, Denmark (FTIR) spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS), Anna De Juan, and matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). The University of Barcelona, Spain variation in the sample set can be described in a hierarchical framework comprising three *Correspondence: populations of the same grass species and four different growth conditions of the parent Janina Kneipp [email protected] plants for each of the populations. -
Raman Scattering and Fluorescence
Fluorescence 01 Raman Scattering and Fluorescence Introduction The existence of such virtual states also explains why the non-resonance Raman effect Raman scattering and Fluorescence emission does not depend on the wavelength of the are two competing phenomena, which have excitation, since no real states are involved in similar origins. Generally, a laser photon this interaction mechanism. In fact, the Raman bounces off a molecule and looses a certain spectrum generally does not depend on the amount of energy that allows the molecule to laser excitation. vibrate (Stokes process). The scattered photon is therefore less energetic and the associated However, when the energy of the excitation light exhibits a frequency shift. The various photon gets close to the transition energy frequency shifts associated with different between two electronic states, one then deals molecular vibrations give rise to a spectrum, with resonance Raman or resonance that is characteristic of a specific compound. fluorescence (fig.1, case (d)). The basic difference between these two processes is In contrast, fluorescence or luminescence related to the time scales involved, as well as emission follows an absorption process. For a with the nature of the so-called intermediate better understanding, one can refer to the states. In contrast with resonant fluorescent, diagram below. relaxed fluorescence results from the emission of a photon from the lowest vibrational level of an excited electronic state, following a direct absorption of the photon and relaxation of the molecule from its vibrationally excited level of the electronic state back to the lowest vibrational level of the electronic state. A fluorescence process typically requires more than 10-9 s. -
Technical Application Note
Compact Rugged Spectrometers - A Universe of Spectroscopy Systems Technical Application Note Vibrational Spectroscopy: Infrared vs. Raman StellarNet, Inc. Tampa, Fl USA Tony Rizzuto, PhD April 12, 2017 Vibrational spectroscopies are integral in analyzing some of the most fundamentally important processes in physical chemistry: molecular vibrations. While there are many different experimental techniques used to analyze those vibrations, most are variations of the “Big Two,” FTIR and Raman scattering spectroscopies. This article aims to analyze the benefits and drawbacks of each of the “Big Two,” with the hope that it helps one choose the correct technique for one’s research interests. 1. What are the “Big Two?” Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy Raman spectroscopy relies on inelastic (FTIR) is a simple absorption measurement scattering phenomenon that probes the where the detector measures the molecular vibration. Where FTIR will use a absorbance of infrared radiation by the broadband IR source, Raman spectroscopy sample. Each sample will absorb different typically uses a narrow-band, amounts of each frequency resulting in a monochromatic light source in order to “chemical fingerprint” that is the FTIR excite the vibrations of the molecule in your spectrum. sample. 2. Selection Rules: What molecular vibrations are being probed? Imagining a molecular bond vibration with the traditional ball and spring model (Figure 1a) and its resultant harmonic oscillator depiction (Figure 1b) allows us to calculate the selection rules for vibrational transitions to be = 1. However, that does not tell the whole story. In order to truly differentiate FTIR from Raman Spectroscopy, we must think about it on a molecular level. Compact Rugged Spectrometers - A Universe of Spectroscopy Systems Technical Application Note A B Figure 1: A. -
The Basic Interactions Between Photons and Charged Particles With
Outline Chapter 6 The Basic Interactions between • Photon interactions Photons and Charged Particles – Photoelectric effect – Compton scattering with Matter – Pair productions Radiation Dosimetry I – Coherent scattering • Charged particle interactions – Stopping power and range Text: H.E Johns and J.R. Cunningham, The – Bremsstrahlung interaction th physics of radiology, 4 ed. – Bragg peak http://www.utoledo.edu/med/depts/radther Photon interactions Photoelectric effect • Collision between a photon and an • With energy deposition atom results in ejection of a bound – Photoelectric effect electron – Compton scattering • The photon disappears and is replaced by an electron ejected from the atom • No energy deposition in classical Thomson treatment with kinetic energy KE = hν − Eb – Pair production (above the threshold of 1.02 MeV) • Highest probability if the photon – Photo-nuclear interactions for higher energies energy is just above the binding energy (above 10 MeV) of the electron (absorption edge) • Additional energy may be deposited • Without energy deposition locally by Auger electrons and/or – Coherent scattering Photoelectric mass attenuation coefficients fluorescence photons of lead and soft tissue as a function of photon energy. K and L-absorption edges are shown for lead Thomson scattering Photoelectric effect (classical treatment) • Electron tends to be ejected • Elastic scattering of photon (EM wave) on free electron o at 90 for low energy • Electron is accelerated by EM wave and radiates a wave photons, and approaching • No -
Optical Light Manipulation and Imaging Through Scattering Media
Optical light manipulation and imaging through scattering media Thesis by Jian Xu In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Pasadena, California 2020 Defended September 2, 2020 ii © 2020 Jian Xu ORCID: 0000-0002-4743-2471 All rights reserved except where otherwise noted iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Foremost, I would like to express my sincere thanks to my advisor Prof. Changhuei Yang, for his constant support and guidance during my PhD journey. He created a research environment with a high degree of freedom and encouraged me to explore fields with a lot of unknowns. From his ethics of research, I learned how to be a great scientist and how to do independent research. I also benefited greatly from his high standards and rigorous attitude towards work, with which I will keep in my future path. My committee members, Professor Andrei Faraon, Professor Yanbei Chen, and Professor Palghat P. Vaidyanathan, were extremely supportive. I am grateful for the collaboration and research support from Professor Andrei Faraon and his group, the helpful discussions in optics and statistics with Professor Yanbei Chen, and the great courses and solid knowledge of signal processing from Professor Palghat P. Vaidyanathan. I would also like to thank the members from our lab. Dr. Haojiang Zhou introduced me to the wavefront shaping field and taught me a lot of background knowledge when I was totally unfamiliar with the field. Dr. Haowen Ruan shared many innovative ideas and designs with me, from which I could understand the research field from a unique perspective.