Flying Post First Nation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Flying Post First Nation CA PDF Page 1 of 22 Energy East Project Volume 25, Binder 2: Mitigation Tables – Boreal Region Flying Post First Nation FLYING POST FIRST NATION Flying Post First Nation (FPFN) (Band No. 227) is affiliated with Wabun Tribal Council as well as with Nishnawbbe Aski Nation and is a signatory of Treaty 9 (FPFN 2016). Flying Post First Nation is governed under a custom electoral system, with a Chief and four Councillors elected to a three-year term (AANDC 2016). Flying Post First Nation has one reserve, Flying Post 73 (5,957 ha), located 40 km southwest of Smooth Rock Falls, Ontario (AANDC 2016). As of March 2016, Flying Post First Nation had a registered population of 220 members, with 1 member on reserve, and 219 members living off reserve (AANDC 2016). Most Flying Post First Nation members live near Nipigon (FPFN 2016). LOCATION RELATIVE TO THE PROJECT Flying Post 73 Reserve is located 77 km from the Project development area (PDA) and 76.7 km from the existing right-of-way (RoW). Flying Post First Nation stated the RoW “crosses important rivers, lakes, wildlife habitats and other land resources in Flying Post Traditional Territory” (FPFN 2015a). Flying Post First Nation also stated the RoW crosses watercourses such as the Nipigon River and Black Sturgeon River, which are used and valued by the Nation (FPFN 2015a). TLRU INFORMATION SOURCES Five members of Flying Post First Nation presented oral traditional evidence (OTE) to the National Energy Board (NEB) regarding the Project. The hearing was held in Timmins, Ontario on November 19, 2015. The transcript from this hearing, which is available on the NEB Project directory (FPFN 2015b), is a source of traditional land and resource use (TLRU) information for Flying Post First Nation considered in this report. The transcript from this OTE hearing was reviewed and information was incorporated into Table 2, columns “Traditional Land and Resource Use Information” and “Flying Post First Nation Mitigation Recommendations”. Additionally, Flying Post First Nation participated in an independent Traditional Land and Resource Use study with the Wabun Tribal Council (WTC 2015). From this study, Wabun Tribal Council Traditional Use Study and Assessment Final Report for TransCanada Pipeline Limited’s Proposed Energy East Project was provided by Wabun Tribal Council for use in the regulatory process for the Project in November 2015. Flying Post First Nation TLRU information from this source is reported within the Wabun Tribal Council section of this Volume 25. KEY TOPICS IDENTIFIED BY FLYING POST FIRST NATION IN RELATION TO THE PROJECT The following key topics were identified from TLRU information provided by Flying Post First Nation in relation to the Project (FPFN 2015b): • Potential effects from the Project to areas where community members regularly hunt, fish and gather. • Potential effects from the Project to wildlife migration patterns, including disruption to the moose corridor near Nipigon pump station. • A campground used by Flying Post First Nation is located 10 km downstream of the Jellicoe Pump Station, 1 km from the existing RoW. • Concern regarding potential contamination to the environment from Project activities. • A pipeline oil spill would affect the Nipigon River watershed, which is important to Flying Post First Nation for drinking water, fish, and wildlife. • Concern regarding locating a break in the pipeline in the event of an underground oil leak and potential for pipeline breaks caused from extreme cold weather. • Concern regarding potential oil spills and chemical contamination during the maintenance of shut off valves at water crossings and questions related to containing and disposal of oil in the event of a leak or spillage during routine maintenance. • Questions regarding how converting the existing pipeline from carrying natural gas to oil will affect the pipeline. • Concern for future generations’ ability to continue to harvest food from the land and experience unspoiled nature. Flying Post First Nation has identified 6 sites within the PDA, 5 sites within the TLRU local assessment area (LAA) and 15 sites within the TLRU regional assessment area (RAA) and. As described in Volume 16, Part C1, Section 5.3.2, for the purposes of the TLRU assessment: (1) the PDA is defined as the area of physical disturbance associated with the construction or operation of the Project; (2) the LAA is defined as the area that extends 1 km beyond the PDA; and (3) the RAA is defined as the area that extends 15 km beyond the PDA. Energy East has developed standard mitigation measures, as listed in Table 2, that are expected to effectively address potential effects from the Project to these sites. Energy East is committed to meeting with Flying Post First Nation to discuss these mitigation measures and determine if additional mitigation measures are required. Flying Post First Nation has raised questions regarding Project construction, maintenance and safety (see Consolidated Application Volume 10, Appendix 72A [Flying Post First Nation]). Flying Post First Nation explained that they had considerable anxiety about the Project. “We’re scared of the pipeline going through our territory because of the unknowns” (FPFN 2015b). Flying Post First Nation raised questions about oil containment and disposal, especially in the case of a line rupture between Nipigon and Eagle Head Station where there are 60 miles of pipe (FPFN 2015b). Energy East Pipeline Ltd. May 2016 1 CA PDF Page 2 of 22 Energy East Project Flying Post First Nation Volume 25, Binder 2: Mitigation Tables – Boreal Region Flying Post First Nation members continue to live off the land and their daily diet consists of moose and fish, as well as other wild foods. “We live this life every day. That’s what we do. We hunt. We fish after work, go up to Nipigon River salmon fishing, whatever’s in season, speckled trout, lake trout” (FPFN 2015b). Flying Post First Nation noted the importance of the Nipigon River. “I fish weekly for brook trout, lake trout, walleye, pike. I hunt moose along the Nipigon River up to Lake Nipigon” (FPFN 2015b). “For anyone that fishes, once again, it has everything. It has good salmon fishing in season. Brook trout fishing, it’s world-class and it’s coming back really well. There's rainbow trout, lake trout. The walleye are coming back. There’s big pike in there. There’s big whitefish in there. Anything you can think of is in there, so as – sturgeon, there’s – so you know, that is a very big concern” (FPFN 2015b). Traditional use areas for Flying Post First Nation are located along the RoW: “In my life, I’ve shot 32 moose, and most of the moose I’ve shot are within the boundaries of the pipeline and the affected areas if there is a problem” (FPFN 2015b). Flying Post First Nation expressed concern about a pipeline spill displacing them from their current hunting and fishing areas, given that in southern Ontario fish and wildlife are too contaminated to be consumed. FLYING POST FIRST NATION TLRU INFORMATION AND MITIGATION TABLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR1 NORTHERN ONTARIO SEGMENT: This segment includes 28 pump stations, permanent access roads, installation of watercourse crossing replacements at the Madawaska and Rideau rivers and mainline valves, realignments around existing TransCanada facilities, and conversion of approximately 1,922 km of existing natural gas pipeline to oil pipeline. The existing pipeline at this segment will remain undisturbed except where there are conversion activities and where new facilities are required. Environmental protection measures for construction are included in the Conversion Segments Environmental Protection Plan (EPP), Temporary Facilities EPP and Pump Station EPP (see Volume 21). This segment also includes seven preliminary camp locations. The existing RoW was not included in the PDA that was assessed as part of the ESA. During operation, maintenance activities will be conducted within the PDA for all Project components. Environmental protection measures for maintenance including pipeline integrity management will follow TransCanada’s health, safety and environmental management framework. PROJECT CONTEXT: This segment is in northern Ontario. Flying Post First Nation has identified the following locations that are farther than 50 km from the PDA: City of Thunder Bay is 51 km from the PDA and the Town of Gogama is 125 km from the PDA. MITIGATION MEASURES: Energy East will implement the following mitigation measures specific to TLRU: • Energy East commits to ongoing communication with Aboriginal groups regarding Project activities (e.g., access during construction, mitigation measures, reclamation planning, post-construction monitoring and access management). • All applicable stakeholders and Aboriginal groups affected by the Project will be notified of the intended Project schedule before the start of construction. • Known TLRU sites and areas deemed appropriate for inclusion by Aboriginal groups will be identified on the environmental alignment sheets or environmental figures (see the EPPs). If TLRU-sensitive features not previously identified are discovered during construction, the TLU Sites Discovery Contingency Plan (see the EPPs) will be followed. • Clearly mark all TLRU sites and areas identified in the resource-specific mitigation tables and the environmental alignment sheets or environmental figures within the immediate vicinity of the PDA before the start of clearing. Following clearing, marking will be undertaken to delineate the sensitive resources. • An environmental and site safety orientation will be developed and implemented by the Contractor for all Project staff and visitors on actions to take if TLRU sensitive features are found. • TLRU access will be maintained to current access roads within or adjacent to the PDA, or temporary pathways will be created to fishing, trapping, hunting, and plant harvesting areas; habitation sites, and cultural or spiritual sites; recreational areas and affected navigable waterbodies; and streams and rivers used for boating (see the EPPs). • An access management plan will be developed prior to construction to manage and control temporary and permanent access during the life of the Project.
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

17 pages remaining, click to load more.

Recommended publications
  • Annual Report on Forest Management 2007/08
    Annual Report on Forest Management For the year April 1, 2007 to March 31, 2008 Minister of Natural Resources of the Province of Ontario To his Honour The Lieutenant-Governor of the Province of Ontario May it please your Honour The undersigned begs respectfully to present to your Honour the Annual Report on Forest Management for the fiscal year beginning April 1, 2007 and ending March 31, 2008. Linda Jeffrey Minister December, 2009 © 2009, Queen’s Printer for Ontario Printed in Ontario, Canada Single copies of this publication are available at no charge from the address noted below. Bulk orders may involve charges. ServiceOntario Publications Call: 1-800-668-9938 www.publications.serviceontario.ca Current publications of the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, and price lists, are also available from this office. Telephone inquiries about ministry programs and services should be directed to the Natural Resources Information Centre: General Inquiry 1-800-667-1940 Renseignements en français 1-800-667­ 1840 FAX (705) 755-1677 Find the Ministry of Natural Resources on­ line at: www.mnr.gov.on.ca Cette publication est également disponible en français. 09/12/19 ISSN 1923-0540 (Online) Annual Report on Forest Management Annual Report on Forest Management - 2007/08 Table of Contents Chapter Topic Page # Executive Summary 13 Introduction 17 Chapter 1 Ontario's Forests 19 Forest Management Planning 22 Forest Information Manual 22 Chapter 2 Forest Products Industry 23 Summary of Forest Sector Revenues and Value Added - 2007/08 25 Summary of Forest
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a IAMGOLD Côté Gold Project Aboriginal Consultation Plan (Previously Submitted to the Ministry of Northern Development and Mines in 2013
    Summary of Consultation to Support the Côté Gold Project Closure Plan Côté Gold Project Appendix A IAMGOLD Côté Gold Project Aboriginal Consultation Plan (previously submitted to the Ministry of Northern Development and Mines in 2013 Stakeholder Consultation Plan (2013) TC180501 | October 2018 CÔTÉ GOLD PROJECT PROVINCIAL INDIVIDUAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROPOSED TERMS OF REFERENCE APPENDIX D PROPOSED STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION PLAN Submitted to: IAMGOLD Corporation 401 Bay Street, Suite 3200 Toronto, Ontario M5H 2Y4 Submitted by: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, a Division of AMEC Americas Limited 160 Traders Blvd. East, Suite 110 Mississauga, Ontario L4Z 3K7 July 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Provincial EA and Consultation Plan Requirements ........................................... 1-1 1.3 Federal EA and Consultation Plan Requirements .............................................. 1-2 1.4 Responsibility for Plan Implementation .............................................................. 1-3 2.0 CONSULTATION APPROACH ..................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Goals and Objectives ......................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Stakeholder Identification ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Community Profiles for the Oneca Education And
    FIRST NATION COMMUNITY PROFILES 2010 Political/Territorial Facts About This Community Phone Number First Nation and Address Nation and Region Organization or and Fax Number Affiliation (if any) • Census data from 2006 states Aamjiwnaang First that there are 706 residents. Nation • This is a Chippewa (Ojibwe) community located on the (Sarnia) (519) 336‐8410 Anishinabek Nation shores of the St. Clair River near SFNS Sarnia, Ontario. 978 Tashmoo Avenue (Fax) 336‐0382 • There are 253 private dwellings in this community. SARNIA, Ontario (Southwest Region) • The land base is 12.57 square kilometres. N7T 7H5 • Census data from 2006 states that there are 506 residents. Alderville First Nation • This community is located in South‐Central Ontario. It is 11696 Second Line (905) 352‐2011 Anishinabek Nation intersected by County Road 45, and is located on the south side P.O. Box 46 (Fax) 352‐3242 Ogemawahj of Rice Lake and is 30km north of Cobourg. ROSENEATH, Ontario (Southeast Region) • There are 237 private dwellings in this community. K0K 2X0 • The land base is 12.52 square kilometres. COPYRIGHT OF THE ONECA EDUCATION PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM 1 FIRST NATION COMMUNITY PROFILES 2010 • Census data from 2006 states that there are 406 residents. • This Algonquin community Algonquins of called Pikwàkanagàn is situated Pikwakanagan First on the beautiful shores of the Nation (613) 625‐2800 Bonnechere River and Golden Anishinabek Nation Lake. It is located off of Highway P.O. Box 100 (Fax) 625‐1149 N/A 60 and is 1 1/2 hours west of Ottawa and 1 1/2 hours south of GOLDEN LAKE, Ontario Algonquin Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Ontario Mills2018
    2018 Mills in Northern Ontario Whitefeather Forest Red Lake Forest ¯ Trout Lake Forest *# Ogoki Forest Whiskey Jack Forest Islington 29 Caribou Forest *# Lac Seul Forest Wabigoon Forest Kenora ForestKenora *# *#*#*# Wabigoon Forest *# Dryden*# Forest Whiskey Jack Forest *# *# Dryden ForestEnglish River Forest Wabigoon Forest *# Kiashke Zaaging Anishinaabek Kenogami Forest Animbiigoo Zaagi'igan Anishinaabek*# *# *# Hwy. 11 Black Spruce ForestBingwi Neyaashi Anishinaabek Hearst Forest*#*# Sapawe Forest Crossroute Forest Lake Nipigon Forest Big Pic Forest Kapuskasing Seine River 22A2 *#*# *# *#*# Abitibi River Forest *#*#Dog River-Matawin Forest *# *# Pic River Forest Nagagami Forest Gordon Cosens Forest *#Cochrane *# Pic River Forest *# Iroquois Falls Lakehead Forest*#Thunder Bay *#*#*# White River*# Forest Val GagnéMonteith Magpie Forest Flying Post First NationTimmins *# Ramore *#*# Matheson Michipicoten First Nation Hwy. 101 Kirkland Lake Romeo Malette Forest Larder Lake Wawa Martel Forest *#*# Virginiatown Michipicoten First Nation Matachewan Chapleau Timiskaming Forest Mattagami First Nation Charlton Chapleau Cree*# First Nation *#Earlton 020 40 80 120 160 Brunswick House First Nation Gogama GowgandaThornloe *#Elk Lake Kilometers Pineland ForestShining Tree #Temiskaming Shores Westree *#Hwy 144 *# Legend Temagami Forest Algoma Forest Temagami # Not Operating *# Spanish Forest 11 Hwy. Sault Ste Marie *# *# 2023 Expiry *# Sudbury ForestSudbury*# Northshore Forest Hwy. *#17 *#Espanola *#*# North Bay *# 2022 Expiry *# *# Nipissing Forest*# *#*# *# 2021 Expiry *#*# *# Algonquin Park Forest*# *# Hwy. 11 2020 Expiry *#*#*#*#*# French-Severn*# Forest*# *# *# 2019 Expiry *# *# *#*# *# Highway Bancroft-Minden*# Forest Indian Reserve *#*# Mazinaw-Lanark Forest*#*# Forest Management Units Barrie *# *# *#*#*# *# *# *#*#.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Report Ivanhoe River
    Draft Environmental Report Ivanhoe River - The Chute and Third Falls Hydroelectric Generating Station Projects Revised May 2013 The Chute and Third Falls Draft Environmental Report May 2013 Insert “Foreword” i The Chute and Third Falls Draft Environmental Report May 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Waterpower in Ontario ................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Introduction to Project .................................................................................................. 1 1.2.1 Zone of Influence .................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Overview of the Environmental Screening Process ........................................................ 4 1.4 Approach to the Environmental Screening Process ........................................................ 5 1.4.1 Legal Framework ................................................................................................... 6 1.4.2 Characterize Local Environment of Proposed Development ................................... 7 1.4.3 Identify Potential Environmental Effects ................................................................. 8 1.4.4 Identify Required Mitigation, Monitoring or Additional Investigations ................... 8 1.4.5 Agency and Public Consultation and Aboriginal Communities Engagement ............ 8 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Electricity Planning in the North & East of Sudbury Region
    IESO Engagement From: IESO Engagement Sent: June 30, 2021 10:23 AM Subject: Regional Electricity Planning in the North & East of Sudbury Region Regional electricity planning activities have begun for the North & East of Sudbury region. A public webinar is scheduled for July 19 at 2:00 p.m. to provide an overview of the electricity planning process, the needs that have been identified for this area, and to seek input on the draft Scoping Assessment report that will determine the most appropriate planning approach going forward to meet the needs. To register, email engagement@ieso.ca. A draft copy of the report will be shared for review in advance of the webinar and written comments will be invited until August 3. All interested parties are invited to participate including, but not limited to, local municipalities, Indigenous communities, businesses, stakeholders and members of the general public. Visit the engagement webpage for more information. The North & East of Sudbury region is defined by electrical infrastructure boundaries, and the area is roughly bordered by the Town of Moosonee to the north, Town of Hearst to the northwest, Municipality of East Ferris to the south, and Town of Kirkland Lake to the East. The region also includes the Indigenous communities of Constance Lake First Nation, Flying Post First Nation, Matachewan First Nation, Mattagami First Nation, Missanabie Cree, Moose Cree First Nation, Nipissing First Nation, Taykwa Tagamou First Nation, Temagami First Nation, Wahgoshig First Nation and Wahnapitae First Nation. The IESO will work with electricity sector partners (including transmitters and local distribution companies), communities, stakeholders, and other interested parties to help define the specific needs and explore possible solutions though the regional electricity planning process.
    [Show full text]
  • Pancon Partners with Flying Post First Nation on Montcalm, Gambler and Nova Projects
    Pancon Partners with Flying Post First Nation on Montcalm, Gambler and Nova Projects October 11, 2018Source ( ) — Pancontinental Resources Corporation (TSXV: PUC) (“Pancon” or the “Company”) is pleased to announce its signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), effective October 1, 2018, with the Flying Post First Nation (FPFN) in northern Ontario. The FPFN- Pancon MOU provides a mutually beneficial framework for cooperation on the Company’s three battery metals exploration projects, located 65 kilometres northwest of Timmins: the Montcalm Project, the Gambler Project, and the Nova Project. Murray Ray, Chief of Flying Post First Nation stated: “Flying Post is pleased with the signing of the MOU. The agreement outlines a process for mutual engagement throughout the exploration phase. Flying Post believes that exploration activities should be done in a manner that is respectful of traditional and treaty rights and the environment, and provide employment and business opportunities. The signing of this MOU is a promising first step in establishing a meaningful relationship with Pancon.” Layton Croft, Pancon President and CEO, stated: “We look forward to a productive, long-term relationship with the Flying Post First Nation as we advance our Montcalm, Gambler and Nova projects near Timmins. This MOU is a tangible example of Pancon’s Community Relations Policy, which affirms our Company’s belief that minerals exploration and mining — in addition to creating value for shareholders — can and should be a positive catalyst for environmental
    [Show full text]
  • For a List of All Advisors Please Click Here
    Ministry of Heritage, Sport, Tourism and Culture Industries Ministry for Seniors and Accessibility Regional Services and Corporate Support Branch – Contact List Region and Office Staff Member Program Delivery Area Central Region Laura Lee Dam Not Applicable Toronto Office Manager 400 University Avenue, 2nd Floor Toronto, Ontario M7A 2R9 Email: Laura-Lee.Dam@ontario.ca Phone: (519) 741-7785 Central Region Roya Gabriele Not Applicable Toronto Office Regional Coordinator 400 University Avenue, 2nd Floor Toronto, Ontario M7A 2R9 Email: Roya.Gabriele@ontario.ca Phone: (647) 631-8951 Central Region Sherry Gupta Not Applicable Toronto Office Public Affairs and Program 400 University Avenue, 2nd Coordinator Floor Toronto, Ontario M7A 2R9 Email: Sherry.Gupta@ontario.ca Phone: (647) 620-6348 Central Region Irina Khvashchevskaya Toronto West (west of Bathurst Street, north to Steeles Toronto Office Regional Development Advisor Avenue) and Etobicoke 400 University Avenue, 2nd Sport/Recreation, Culture/Heritage, Floor Toronto, Ontario M7A 2R9 Seniors and Accessibility Portfolios Email: Irina.Khvashchevskaya@ontario.ca Phone: (647) 629-4498 Central Region, Bilingual Mohamed Bekkal Toronto East (east of Don Valley Parkway, north to Steeles Toronto Office Regional Development Advisor Avenue) and Scarborough 400 University Avenue, 2nd Sport/Recreation, Culture/Heritage, Floor Toronto, Ontario M7A 2R9 Seniors and Accessibility Portfolios Francophone Organizations in Toronto Email: Mohamed.Bekkal@ontario.ca Phone: (416) 509-5461 Central Region Shannon Todd
    [Show full text]
  • Gordon Cosens Forest Independent Forest Audit April 1, 2005 – March 31, 2010
    Gordon Cosens Forest Independent Forest Audit April 1, 2005 – March 31, 2010 ArborVitae Environmental Services March 4, 2011 © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2011 Final Report Independent Audit of the Gordon Cosens Forest Table of Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................... 1 2.0 TABLE OF AUDIT FINDINGS .............................................................................. 4 3.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 6 3.1 AUDIT PROCESS .................................................................................................. 6 3.2 MANAGEMENT UNIT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................ 6 3.3 CURRENT ISSUES ................................................................................................ 9 3.4 SUMMARY OF CONSULTATION AND INPUT TO AUDIT ............................................ 10 4.0 AUDIT FINDINGS ............................................................................................... 11 4.1 COMMITMENT .................................................................................................... 11 4.2 PUBLIC CONSULTATION AND ABORIGINAL INVOLVEMENT ..................................... 11 4.3 FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING ..................................................................... 12 4.4 PLAN ASSESSMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION ......................................................... 16 4.5 SYSTEM SUPPORT
    [Show full text]
  • ABITIBI RIVER INDEPENDENT FOREST AUDIT 2010 – 2017 February 28, 2018
    1 ABITIBI RIVER INDEPENDENT FOREST AUDIT 2010 – 2017 February 28, 2018 © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2018 ABITIBI RIVER FOREST IFA: 2010–2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents........................................................................................................................................... i List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................. ii List of Figures ................................................................................................................................................ ii 1 Executive Summary............................................................................................................................... 1 2 Table of Findings and Best Practices..................................................................................................... 3 3 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Audit Process ................................................................................................................................ 4 3.2 Management Unit Description ..................................................................................................... 5 4 Audit Findings ....................................................................................................................................... 6 4.1 Commitment ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 4.0 Public Consultation
    VICTOR DIAMOND PROJECT Comprehensive Study Report 4.0 PUBLIC CONSULTATION Two main purposes of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act are to promote communication and cooperation between responsible authorities and Aboriginal peoples with respect to environmental assessment and to ensure that there be opportunities for timely and meaningful public participation throughout the environmental assessment process. At the beginning of the process, the responsible authorities determined that consultation with First Nations, the public and stakeholders would be necessary during the environmental assessment. The responsible authorities also determined that consultation was required before the development of guidelines, so as to be able to use information and concerns collected during consultation in the development of guidelines. De Beers also undertook consultation with First Nations, the public and stakeholders on the project before and during the environmental assessment process. Consultation on the project was carried out both prior to and following submission of the CSEA in March 2004. Consultation prior to the CSEA submission is referred to as “pre-consultation” in that it pre-dated the environmental assessment public review period. Consultation during and after the public review period is referred to as “EA consultation”. Pre-consultation includes the meetings, discussions, and exchange of information that were carried out by the RAs and FAs starting in September 2003, before the Guidelines were drafted, as well as consultation by the Proponent starting in May 2001 with initiation of the Desktop Study. EA consultation includes public notices, meetings, discussions, information sessions and written documentation related to the comprehensive study. 4.1 Environmental Assessment – Pre-consultation, Guidelines and Public Registry 4.1.1 Federal Government Consultation Preceding Guidelines On August 3, 2003, NRCan assumed the position of lead RA, and the federal environmental process began.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.0 CONSULTATION SUMMARY 4.1 Overview an Important Part of The
    4.0 CONSULTATION SUMMARY 4.1 Overview An important part of the Project permitting and planning process is proactive consultation with potentially affected and interested stakeholders, Aboriginal communities and government agencies. For the Project, consultation has involved informing and engaging these respective Parties about the development of the Project, responding to their interests and concerns, and continuing to build and maintain positive relationships. This has been and is currently being achieved, by creating avenues for dialogue and information exchange (verbal and written), and by fostering an ongoing relationship between IAMGOLD and these stakeholder and Aboriginal groups. IAMGOLD and the Federal and Provincial government agencies recognize opportunities for synergy in planning and implementing stakeholder engagement and consultation for their respective Environmental Assessment (EA) processes, and will attempt to align consultation activities to the extent practical. IAMGOLD developed a Stakeholder Consultation Plan and Aboriginal Consultation Plan (see Appendix C) to coordinate consultation activities as much as possible without the need for duplication of effort. These plans were included as part of IAMGOLD’s submission of the Project Description (PD) and revised for the Terms of Reference (ToR). The stakeholder consultation plans were developed based on guidance provided in the Provincial and Federal consultation planning and requirements for EAs. These plans also follow IAMGOLD’s standards and best practices for community
    [Show full text]