Hudson River Natural Resource Damage Assessment Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hudson River Natural Resource Damage Assessment Plan HUDSON RIVER NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT PLAN PREPARED BY THE HUDSON RIVER TRUSTEE COUNCIL STATE OF NEW YORK STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE SEPTEMBER 2002 HUDSON RIVER NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT PLAN PREPARED BY THE HUDSON RIVER TRUSTEES SEPTEMBER 2002 his Natural Resource Damage Assessment Plan was prepared by the Hudson River Natural TResource Trustee Council, which consists of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, the U.S. Department of Commerce’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the U.S. Department of the Interior’s Fish and Wildlife Service. The Trustees are working cooperatively to conduct a Natural Resource Damage Assessment (NRDA) for the Hudson River. This Assessment Plan is one step in the NRDA and documents exposure of natural resources to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and identifies the anticipated procedures for evaluating the injuries caused by this exposure. CONTACTS FOR PUBLIC INQUIRIES: Steven Jay Sanford Chief, Bureau of Habitat Division of Fish, Wildlife and Marine Resources New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway Albany, NY 12233 518-402-8996 [email protected] Tom Brosnan Damage Assessment Center National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 1305 East-West Highway SSMC4, Room 10219 Silver Spring, MD 20910 301-713-3038 x186 [email protected] Fred Caslick U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 3817 Luker Road Cortland, NY 13045 607-753-9334 x156 [email protected] Credits: Cover Photo: Courtesy of NYSDEC Title Page Photo: Courtesy of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/Department of Commerce Line Art by Robert J. Savannah HUDSON RIVER N A TURAL TABLE OF CONTENTS R ESOURCE LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS . iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. 1 D CHAPTER 1 THE NATURAL, CULTURAL, AND ECONOMIC SIGNIFICANCE OF THE HUDSON RIVER . 7 AMAGE Ecological Communities of the Hudson River. 9 Hudson Falls to Troy . 10 Troy to Newburgh . 11 A Newburgh to Manhattan . 12 SSESSMENT Historical Significance of the Hudson River . 15 Recreation and the Modern Economy. 17 Further Economic Significance of the Hudson River. 18 CHAPTER 2 PCB CONTAMINATION IN THE HUDSON RIVER . 19 P LAN History and Effects of PCBs in the Hudson River . 19 Cleaning Up PCBs in the Hudson River . 21 CHAPTER 3 THE ROLE OF THE TRUSTEES . 27 Preliminary Determination of the Recovery Period . 30 Coordination with Other Government Agencies . 31 Importance of Public Participation . 32 Invitation for Cooperative Assessment. 33 CHAPTER 4 THE HUDSON RIVER NRDA: ASSESSMENT AND RESTORATION. 35 Pathway Determination. 36 PCB Sources to Sediment and Water . 37 Food Web Pathway Evaluation. 37 Floodplain Evaluation . 38 Injury Determination and Quantification . 38 Biological Resources. 39 Surface Water. 50 Groundwater . 52 Geologic Resources . 53 Air . 53 Damage Determination and Restoration . 54 Recreational Fishing Lost Use Study. 54 Habitat Equivalency Analysis . 55 Assessment of Lost Navigational Services . 55 Assessment of Impacts to National Park Sites and Affiliated Areas . 56 TABLE OF CONTENTS Subject to Public Review i REFERENCES . 57 LAN P GLOSSARY . 63 APPENDIX A: QUALITY ASSURANCE MANAGEMENT . 67 HUDSON RIVER APPENDIX B: FACT SHEETS. 71 SSESSMENT A Assessing Fish Health . 73 Preliminary Investigations of Bird Injuries. 75 Preliminary Investigation of Snapping Turtles . 77 AMAGE Hudson River Natural Resource Damage Assessment: Summary of the NRDA Plan. 79 D ESOURCE R EXHIBITS TURAL A Exhibit 1-1 Hudson River Below Corinth, New York . 8 N Exhibit 1-2 Endangered, Threatened, Special Concern or Rare Species Identified in or Near the Hudson River by the State of New York or as Potentially Occurring in or Near the Hudson River by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service . 13–14 Exhibit 1-3 Selected Events in the Recorded History of the Hudson River. 16 Exhibit 2-1 Basic Chemical Structure of PCBs. 20 Exhibit 2-2 PCB Concentrations in Selected Hudson River Natural Resources, Regulatory Criteria and Guidelines, and Threshold/Effects Identified in the Literature. 22–24 Exhibit 2-3 Selected Chronology of Events Related to the Discharge, Discovery, and Removal of PCBs in the Hudson River . 25 Exhibit 4-1 Pathway Determination. 37 Exhibit 4-2 Injury Determination and Quantification . 40–41 Exhibit 4-3 Damage Determination and Restoration . 55 Exhibit A-1 Project Quality Assurance Organization . 68 ii Subject to Public Review TABLE OF CONTENTS HUDSON RIVER N A TURAL ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS R ESOURCE ATSDR Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act CFR Code of Federal Regulations D CWA Clean Water Act AMAGE DOI United States Department of the Interior EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency A FDA United States Food and Drug Administration SSESSMENT GE The General Electric Company LC 50 Lethal Concentration 50 NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NPL National Priorities List P LAN NPS National Park Service NRDA Natural Resource Damage Assessment NYSDEC New York State Department of Environmental Conservation NYSDOH New York State Department of Health NYSDOS New York State Department of State NYSDOT New York State Department of Transportation PCB Polychlorinated biphenyl PED Preliminary Estimate of Damages ppb parts per billion ppm parts per million ppt parts per thousand PRG Preliminary Remediation Goals PSD Preassessment Screen Determination ROD Record of Decision SDWA Safe Drinking Water Act SPDES State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System SWDA Solid Waste Disposal Act TEQ Toxic Equivalent TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service USGS United States Geological Survey ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS Subject to Public Review iii HUDSON RIVER N A TURAL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY R ESOURCE D AMAGE A SSESSMENT Spanning the Hudson, Bear Mountain Bridge connects P Peekskill and LAN Orange County and is the crossing point for the Appalachian Photo courtesy of NYSDEC Trail. he Hudson River flows from its source in and has supported commercial and recreational Tthe Adirondack Mountains to its confluence fishing, as well as swimming and boating. Also, with New York Harbor at the Battery in the river has been used in the direct generation of Manhattan, a distance of about 315 miles. The electricity, and as a source of cooling water for Hudson River has provided important natural other forms of power generation. Many river com- resources and services to the residents of the munities have depended on the Hudson River as a Hudson River Valley since the earliest days of source of potable water. Over time, ever-increas- human settlement. The earliest European explo- ing urbanization and industrialization began to ration was by Henry Hudson in the early seven- degrade the river and its natural resources. teenth century. The Hudson River provided a In the early 1970s, a group of toxic com- travel corridor to facilitate westward exploration pounds known as polychlorinated biphenyls, or of New York by European settlers and was a focal PCBs, were discovered in the water, fish, and sed- point during the Revolutionary and French and iment of the Hudson River below General Indian Wars. President Franklin Delano Electric Company’s (GE’s) plants at Hudson Falls Roosevelt made his home along the Hudson and Fort Edward. As a result of PCB contamina- River near Hyde Park, New York. Because of its tion, fishing was banned in the Upper Hudson rich resources and heritage, the Hudson River has River from Hudson Falls to Troy between 1976 been formally recognized as an American and 1995, and fishing in that river reach is cur- Heritage River and serves as the site of a National rently restricted to catch and release only (1). In Estuarine Research Reserve. addition, the Hudson River below the Federal The river has been used as a transportation Dam at Troy was closed to commercial fishing for corridor for commercial and recreational traffic, almost all species of fish, and fish in that part of EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Subject to Public Review 1 the river have been the subject of “no consump- the condition that would have existed if the haz- LAN tion” or restrictive consumption advisories due to ardous substances were not released. In addition, P PCB contamination. The discovery of PCBs in the Trustees may obtain compensation for natural the Hudson River and other locations also resource injuries and the loss of the services they prompted many scientists to study the effects of provide between the onset of the injury and full HUDSON RIVER these compounds on wildlife. Years later, this restoration. research indicates that PCBs can cause serious SSESSMENT The U.S. Congress enacted the Superfund injuries to wildlife and other natural resources. A law to assign responsibility for the cost of cleaning up hazardous substances that threaten human health and the environment, and for restoring or THE TRUSTEE ROLE replacing any public natural resources that are AMAGE The responsibility for restoring natural resources harmed by hazardous substance releases. It is the D that have been injured by hazardous substances U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) belongs to Federal, State, and Tribal Trustees for responsibility to select a remedy that is intended fish, wildlife, other living resources, water, lands, to reduce or eliminate current and future threats and protected areas. Trusteeship is derived from to human health or the environment. It is the ESOURCE Federal and Tribal treaties, Federal and State Tr ustees’ responsibility to restore or replace the R statutes, and other laws. For the.
Recommended publications
  • Freshwater Fishing: a Driver for Ecotourism
    New York FRESHWATER April 2019 FISHINGDigest Fishing: A Sport For Everyone NY Fishing 101 page 10 A Female's Guide to Fishing page 30 A summary of 2019–2020 regulations and useful information for New York anglers www.dec.ny.gov Message from the Governor Freshwater Fishing: A Driver for Ecotourism New York State is committed to increasing and supporting a wide array of ecotourism initiatives, including freshwater fishing. Our approach is simple—we are strengthening our commitment to protect New York State’s vast natural resources while seeking compelling ways for people to enjoy the great outdoors in a socially and environmentally responsible manner. The result is sustainable economic activity based on a sincere appreciation of our state’s natural resources and the values they provide. We invite New Yorkers and visitors alike to enjoy our high-quality water resources. New York is blessed with fisheries resources across the state. Every day, we manage and protect these fisheries with an eye to the future. To date, New York has made substantial investments in our fishing access sites to ensure that boaters and anglers have safe and well-maintained parking areas, access points, and boat launch sites. In addition, we are currently investing an additional $3.2 million in waterway access in 2019, including: • New or renovated boat launch sites on Cayuga, Oneida, and Otisco lakes • Upgrades to existing launch sites on Cranberry Lake, Delaware River, Lake Placid, Lake Champlain, Lake Ontario, Chautauqua Lake and Fourth Lake. New York continues to improve and modernize our fish hatcheries. As Governor, I have committed $17 million to hatchery improvements.
    [Show full text]
  • NY Excluding Long Island 2017
    DISCONTINUED SURFACE-WATER DISCHARGE OR STAGE-ONLY STATIONS The following continuous-record surface-water discharge or stage-only stations (gaging stations) in eastern New York excluding Long Island have been discontinued. Daily streamflow or stage records were collected and published for the period of record, expressed in water years, shown for each station. Those stations with an asterisk (*) before the station number are currently operated as crest-stage partial-record station and those with a double asterisk (**) after the station name had revisions published after the site was discontinued. Those stations with a (‡) following the Period of Record have no winter record. [Letters after station name designate type of data collected: (d) discharge, (e) elevation, (g) gage height] Period of Station Drainage record Station name number area (mi2) (water years) HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN Tenmile River near Wassaic, NY (d) 01199420 120 1959-61 Swamp River near Dover Plains, NY (d) 01199490 46.6 1961-68 Tenmile River at Dover Plains, NY (d) 01199500 189 1901-04 BLIND BROOK BASIN Blind Brook at Rye, NY (d) 01300000 8.86 1944-89 BEAVER SWAMP BROOK BASIN Beaver Swamp Brook at Mamaroneck, NY (d) 01300500 4.42 1944-89 MAMARONECK RIVER BASIN Mamaroneck River at Mamaroneck, NY (d) 01301000 23.1 1944-89 BRONX RIVER BASIN Bronx River at Bronxville, NY (d) 01302000 26.5 1944-89 HUDSON RIVER BASIN Opalescent River near Tahawus, NY (d) 01311900 9.02 1921-23 Fishing Brook (County Line Flow Outlet) near Newcomb, NY (d) 0131199050 25.2 2007-10 Arbutus Pond Outlet
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Arlington Hazard Mitigation Plan Arlington, Vermont
    Town of Arlington Hazard Mitigation Plan Arlington, Vermont April 8, 2019 Revised May 23, 2019 Revised July 15, 2019 Adopted August 26, 2019 Table of Contents List of Tables ........................................................................................... 2 List of Figures ......................................................................................... 3 I. Introduction ...................................................................................... 1 A. Purpose ............................................................................................................................................... 1 B. Mitigation Goals .................................................................................................................................. 2 II. Town Profile ...................................................................................... 2 A. Regional Context ................................................................................................................................. 2 B. Demography and Land Use ................................................................................................................. 2 C. Economic and Cultural Resources ....................................................................................................... 3 D. Critical Facilities .................................................................................................................................. 3 III. Planning Process ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Autumn 2008 Newsletter.Pub
    The Hoosic River Voice New s from the Hoosic River W atershed Association Autum n 2008 Vermont Un-assessed Waters Project financed by the sale may fly, and stone fly larvae.) of the state’s con- Vermont regularly assesses BMI servation license populations on most of the state’s plates), Kelly has streams (usually on a once-every- begun the Vermont several-years basis), but the state al- Un-assessed Waters locates its resources over a large area Project on Hoosic to capture water quality trends and and Batten Kill identify major sources of pollution. tributaries in Ver- As a result, about 18% of Vermont’s mont. watercourses have never been sam- The goal of the pro- pled. ject is to determine In Basin 1, this is changing. In water quality on un- 2008, for the first time, BMIs were assessed streams by sampled on seven Hoosic tributaries sampling and that had never before been assessed. Steve Fiske VT DEC aquatic biologist (L), and Kelly Nolan, analyzing ben- (Kelly also sampled at five sites in HooRWA monitoring coordinator, discuss physical habitat at thic macroinver- the Batten Kill watershed.) Barney Brook in Bennington in September. tebrate (BMI) In each watershed, Kelly has used populations, and Vermont DEC sampling protocols The Hoosic is undeniably special, documenting high water quality and data processing quality assur- but in at least one respect we are not tributaries in Basin 1. (BMIs are the ance/quality control methods, ensur- alone. With the Batten Kill, we are creatures that live on the bottom of ing that the information collected is the only Vermont watersheds which our streams, critters like caddis fly, comparable and compatible with data drain to the Hudson River.
    [Show full text]
  • Cleaning up Hudson River Pcbs Project Brochure
    Thursday,May19,201111:50:38AM G:\002200-002299\002260\HR07_02_03\Graphics\Trifold\CleaningupHudsonTrifold-April2011.cdr R O P T E L C A T T fEngineers of I N O CsSPRUDSITE SITE SUPERFUND SUPERFUND PCBs PCBs ® E N SAm Corps Army US M A Hudson Hudson River River N G O E R I N V C N Y E U S N E I T T E A D T S 020H0.20-laigu usnTrifold.cdr-4/18/11-GRA Hudson up 002260.HR07.02.03-Cleaning 58 9-07 r olfe 88 596-3655 (888) toll-free or, 792-4087, (518) rdigifrainpoeline: phone information dredging rjc,cl eea lcrcs24-hour Electric's General call project, oakqetoso oc ocrsaotthe about concerns voice or questions ask To or yappointment. by hours rdy :0am o43 .. ihevening with p.m., 4:30 to a.m. 8:00 Friday, h il fiehusaeMna through Monday are hours Office Field The [email protected] 58 4-39o 86 1-40Toll-Free 615-6490 (866) or 747-4389 (518) usnFls Y12839 NY Falls, Hudson 2 oe anStreet Main Lower 421 eilpooo h usnRvradisfloodplain its and River Hudson the of photo Aerial usnRvrFedOffice Field River Hudson Coordinator aiaRomanowski, Larisa omnt Involvement Community Floodplain P Contact: EPA River pig2011 Spring www.epa.gov/hudson Floodplain fiea h drs eo rlgo to on log or below address the at Office ii,cl,o rt oteHdo ie Field River Hudson the to write or call, Visit, Source: Microsoft Corporation, 2009 PCBs o oeInformation: More For usnRiver Hudson r needed. are odtriei nei lau measures cleanup interim if determine to laigUp Cleaning sdt upeetacmrhniestudy comprehensive a supplement to used usn h eut ftesmln ilbe will sampling the of results The Hudson.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Ddt, Chlordane, and Total Pcb's in Bed Sediments in the Hudson River Basin
    NYES&E, Vol. 3, No. 1, Spring 1997 DISTRIBUTION OF DDT, CHLORDANE, AND TOTAL PCB'S IN BED SEDIMENTS IN THE HUDSON RIVER BASIN Patrick J. Phillips1, Karen Riva-Murray1, Hannah M. Hollister2, and Elizabeth A. Flanary1. 1U.S. Geological Survey, 425 Jordan Road, Troy NY 12180. 2Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Troy NY 12180. Abstract Data from streambed-sediment samples collected from 45 sites in the Hudson River Basin and analyzed for organochlorine compounds indicate that residues of DDT, chlordane, and PCB's can be detected even though use of these compounds has been banned for 10 or more years. Previous studies indicate that DDT and chlordane were widely used in a variety of land use settings in the basin, whereas PCB's were introduced into Hudson and Mohawk Rivers mostly as point discharges at a few locations. Detection limits for DDT and chlordane residues in this study were generally 1 µg/kg, and that for total PCB's was 50 µg/kg. Some form of DDT was detected in more than 60 percent of the samples, and some form of chlordane was found in about 30 percent; PCB's were found in about 33 percent of the samples. Median concentrations for p,p’- DDE (the DDT residue with the highest concentration) were highest in samples from sites representing urban areas (median concentration 5.3 µg/kg) and lower in samples from sites in large watersheds (1.25 µg/kg) and at sites in nonurban watersheds. (Urban watershed were defined as those with a population density of more than 60/km2; nonurban watersheds as those with a population density of less than 60/km2, and large watersheds as those encompassing more than 1,300 km2.
    [Show full text]
  • Hudson River National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan OCTOBER 1, 2019–OCTOBER 1, 2024
    Hudson River National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan OCTOBER 1, 2019–OCTOBER 1, 2024 Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor | Basil Seggos, Commissioner Acknowledgments This plan was prepared by staff of the Hudson River National Estuarine Research Reserve, including Betsy Blair, Chris Bowser, Ann-Marie Caprioli, Brian DeGasperis, Sarah Fernald, Heather Gierloff, Emilie Hauser, Dan Miller, and Sarah Mount, with the assistance of Andy Burgher, Cathy Kittle, and Bill Rudge in the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation; Ed McGowan of the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation; and Nina Garfield and Ann Weaver of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office for Coastal Management. We appreciate input that has informed development of this plan provided by other colleagues, local leaders, county officials, environmental organizations, researchers, educators, and marsh managers. Suggested citation: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC). 2019. Hudson River National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan. Albany, NY. Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... iv Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 The Reserve .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Communities of New York State
    Ecological Communities of New York State by Carol Reschke New York Natural Heritage Program N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation 700 Troy-Schenectady Road Latham, NY 12110-2400 March 1990 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The New York Natural Heritage Program is supported by funds from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) and The Nature Conservancy. Within DEC, funding comes from the Division of Fish and Wildlife and the Division of Lands and Forests. The Heritage Program is partly supported by funds contributed by state taxpayers through the voluntary Return a Gift to Wildlife program. The Heritage Program has received funding for community inventory work from the Adirondack Council, the Hudson River Foundation, the Sussman Foundation, U.S. National Park Service, U.S. Forest Service (Finger Lakes National Forest), and each of the seven New York chapters of The Nature Conservancy (Adirondack Nature Conservancy, Eastern New York Chapter, Central New York Chapter, Long Island Chapter, Lower Hudson Chapter, South Fork/Shelter Island Chapter, and WesternNew YorJ< Chapter) This classification has been developed in part from data collected by numerous field biologists. Some of these contributors have worked under contract to the Natural Heritage Program, including Caryl DeVries, Brian Fitzgerald, Jerry Jenkins, Al Scholz, Edith Schrot, Paul Sherwood, Nancy Slack, Dan Smith, Gordon Tucker, and F. Robert Wesley. Present and former Heritage staff who have contributed a significant portion of field data include Peter Zika, Robert E. Zaremba, Lauren Lyons-Swift, Steven Clemants, and the author. Chris Nadareski helped compile long species lists for many communities by entering data from field survey forms into computer files.
    [Show full text]
  • Chittenden Falls Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No
    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR HYDROPOWER LICENSE Chittenden Falls Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No. 3273-024 New York Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Office of Energy Projects Division of Hydropower Licensing 888 First Street, NE Washington, D.C. 20426 January 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................... xii LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ xiii ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................... xiv 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Application .................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of Action and Need For Power ........................................................ 2 1.2.1 Purpose of Action ............................................................................ 2 1.2.2 Need for Power ................................................................................ 4 1.3 Statutory and Regulatory Requirements ....................................................... 4 1.4 Public Review and Comment ........................................................................ 4 1.4.1 Scoping ............................................................................................ 4 1.4.2 Interventions ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rayburn, Desimone, and Frappier B4-1
    Rayburn, DeSimone, and Frappier B4-1 NEW INSIGHTS INTO GLACIAL LAKES VERMONT AND ALBANY By John A. Rayburn1, Dept. of Geology, SUNY New Paltz, New Paltz, NY 12443 David J. DeSimone2, DeSimone Geoscience Investigations, Petersburg, NY 12138 Amy B. Frappier3, Department of Geosciences, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 Email addresses: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] INTRODUCTION The first comprehensive study of the proglacial lakes in the Hudson and Champlain Valleys was published by J.B. Woodworth in 1905 (NYSM Bulletin 84). He noted that “Lake Albany doubtless began on the south in the waters standing in front of the retreating ice sheet prior to the opening of the Mohawk outlet of the great glacial lakes to the west. As soon as the ice retreated in the valley to a position north of Albany and the drainage of Lake Iroquois came into the Hudson Valley Lake Albany properly came into existence”. While glacial lacustrine sediments in the Champlain Valley were originally attributed by Upham (1889), Baldwin (1894), Peet (1904), and others to be a separate Glacial Lake Champlain, Woodworth notes that its confines were somewhat larger and proposed the name of Glacial Lake Vermont, and that to the south it was certainly confluent with Glacial Lake Albany as he defined. “The outlet of theses ice-dammed waters at this early stage of confluence across the present divide of the Hudson and Champlain basins is a matter which concerns the interpretation of Lake Albany on the south and is considered in that connection. Lake Vermont may be said properly to have come into existence when in consequence of a local lowering of waters south of Fort Edward a discharge began across a barrier into the Hudson Valley to the south.” While Woodworth (1905) only described one Lake Albany level, he noted under Lake Vermont that there were the Quaker Springs, Coveville, and Fort Edward levels.
    [Show full text]
  • T a P P a N Z
    Federal Dam Watervliet Rt. 787 Bridge Starbuck Island Troy Rt. 2 Bridge Water chestnut Vallisneria Rt. 378 Bridge Other Stuff Albany Rensselaer Amtrack Bridges Rt. 20 Bridge Normans Kill Papscaneek Island e e r C e Campbell Island e n a c s p a Vloman Kill P Shad Island Castleton-On-Hudson Conrail and To 90 Bridges k Upper Schodack Island e e r C Lower Schodack Island k c a d o h Ravena c S Houghtaling Island k Cree Mill Bronck Island Coxsackie Island Nutten Hook Coxsackie Stockport Middle Ground Creek kport Stoc West Flats Middle Ground Flats Athens Hudson C Catskill a Rogers Island t sk il Rip Van Winkle Bridge l R o e Inbocht Bay li ff Ja nse Duck Cove n K ill Germantown Saugerties Esop us Creek Tivoli North Bay Tivoli South Bay Kingston-Rinecliff Bridge Kingston reek t C ou nd Ro Esopus Vanderburgh Meadows Cove Point Norrie State Park reek k C ac Bl Blunts Rock Bard Rock Highland Conrail Bridge Mid-Hudson Bridge Poughkeepsie k Lattintown Cre ree ek r C ge Marlboro in pp Wappingers Falls a W Newburgh Beacon Denning Point Fishkill Creek M ood na a Pollepel Island Cold Spring Constitution Island West Point Con Hook ek Bear Mt. Bridge re C le il sv nn Iona Island A Peekskill Bear Mt. State Park Peekskill Bay Buchanan Stony Point State Park H Georges Park Island A d V Pon E dar R Ce S T R A Croton-on-Hudson W r e v Haverstraw B i A R Y n o t o Croton r Point C Ossining T A P P A N Z E E Nyack Tarrytown Tappan Zee Bridge Piermont Irvington Piermont Marsh Hastings-on-Hudson Yonkers Yonkers Tenafly Englewood BRONX RIVER George Washington Bridge Bronx Fort Lee Fairview Union City Manhattan Hoboken EAST RIVER Jersey City Williamsburg Bridge Manhattan Bridge Brooklyn Bridge Bayonne Brooklyn KILL VAN KULL Verrazano-Narrows Bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Watershed Management Division Batten Kill Walloomsac Hoosic
    Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Watershed Management Division Batten Kill Walloomsac Hoosic TACTICAL BASIN PLAN The Hudson River Basin (in Vermont) - Water Quality Management Plan was prepared in accordance with 10 VSA § 1253(d), the Vermont Water Quality Standards1, the Federal Clean Water Act and 40 CFR 130.6, and the Vermont Surface Water Management Strategy. Approved: Pursuant to Section 1-02 D (5) of the VWQS, Basin Plans shall propose the appropriate Water Management Type of Types for Class B waters based on the existing water quality and reasonably attainable and desired water quality management goals. ANR has not included proposed Water Management Types in this Basin Plan. ANR is in the process of developing an anti-degradation rule in accordance with 10 VSA 1251a (c) and is re-evaluating whether Water Management Typing is the most effective and efficient method of ensuring that quality of Vermont's waters are maintained and enhanced as required by the VWQS, including the anti-degradation policy. Accordingly, this Basin Plan is being issued by ANR with the acknowledgement that it does not meet the requirements of Section 1-02 D (5) of the VWQS. The Vermont Agency of Natural Resources is an equal opportunity agency and offers all persons the benefits of participating in each of its programs and competing in all areas of employment regardless of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, sexual preference, or other non-merit factors. This document is available upon request in large print, braille or audiocassette. VT Relay Service for the Hearing Impaired 1-800-253-0191 TDD>Voice - 1-800-253-0195 Voice>TDD Hudson River Basin Tactical Plan Overview 2 | P a g e Basin 01 - Batten Kill, Walloomsac, Hoosic Tactical Basin Plan – Final 2015 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]