A Crucible Moment: College Learning and Democracy's Future
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Fair Measure of the Right to Vote: a Comparative Perspective on Voting Rights Enforcement in a Maturing Democracy
SCHOOL OF LAW LEGAL STUDIES RESEARCH PAPER SERIES PAPER #10-0186 JUNE 2010 FAIR MEASURE OF THE RIGHT TO VOTE: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE ON VOTING RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT IN A MATURING DEMOCRACY JANAI S. NELSON EMAIL COMMENTS TO: [email protected] ST. JOHN’S UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW 8000 UTOPIA PARKWAY QUEENS, NY 11439 This paper can be downloaded without charge at: The Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection http://ssrn.com/abstract=1628798 DO NOT CITE OR CIRCULATE WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION OF AUTHOR ———————————————————————————————————— FAIR MEASURE OF THE RIGHT TO VOTE ———————————————————————————————————— Fair Measure of the Right to Vote: A Comparative Perspective on Voting Rights Enforcement in a Maturing Democracy Janai S. Nelson ABSTRACT Fair measure of a constitutional norm requires that we consider whether the scope of the norm can be broader than its enforcement. This query is usually answered in one of two ways: some constitutional theorists argue that the scope and enforcement of the norm are co-terminous, while others argue that the norm maintains its original scope and breadth even if it is underenforced. This Article examines the right to vote when it exists as a constitutional norm and is underenforced by both judicial and non-judicial actors. First, I adopt the position that the scope and meaning of a constitutional norm can be greater than its enforcement. Second, I rely on the argument that underenforcement results not only from judicial underenforcement but also from underenforcement by the legislative and administrative actors that are obligated to enforce constitutional norms to the fullest extent. By employing these two principles, this Article analyzes the underenforcement of the right to vote that has evaded the force of some of the most liberal contemporary constitutions. -
The Importance of Cultural Identity to Liberal Democracy
Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2019 The mpI ortance of Cultural Identity to Liberal Democracy Rebecca Ilana Shane Recommended Citation Shane, Rebecca Ilana, "The mporI tance of Cultural Identity to Liberal Democracy" (2019). CMC Senior Theses. 2264. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/2264 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Claremont McKenna College The Importance of Cultural Identity to Liberal Democracy submitted to Professor Paul Hurley and Professor Aseema Sinha by Rebecca Shane for Senior Thesis Spring 2019 April 29, 2019 1 Abstract The challenge facing liberal theories of democracy is to describe an organization of state that both legitimates state power and protects individual liberty. In Democratic Rights: The Substance of Self-Government, Corey Brettschneider develops the value theory of democracy that resolves this tension. By locating the democratic ideal in a set of core values with both procedural and substantive implications, the value theory legitimates state coercion only when it protects citizens’ rights. While the value theory guarantees both substantive and procedural rights, this thesis will show that Brettschneider fails to account for the necessity of a secure cultural context, without which members of a minority culture may not be able to enjoy the core values as Brettschneider intends. Yet, the value theory of democracy can maintain a commitment to equality and autonomy when amended to have specific ethnic and cultural identity protections. Ultimately, this thesis will argue that the amended value theory provides a framework for citizens to both evaluate laws and correct injustices based on whether or not the policies uphold the core values. -
Mechanisms Underlying the Link Between Child Maltreatment Severity and Psychological Distress in College Women
Mindfulness (2020) 11:1446–1459 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01361-2 ORIGINAL PAPER Self-compassion and Fear of Self-compassion: Mechanisms Underlying the Link between Child Maltreatment Severity and Psychological Distress in College Women Terri L. Messman-Moore1 & Prachi H. Bhuptani1 Published online: 17 April 2020 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020 Abstract Objectives Women are at increased risk for depression and anxiety associated with child maltreatment, given higher rates of exposure to childhood maltreatment and a greater sensitivity resulting in maltreatment-related distress. Thus, there is a need to identify mechanisms of resilience among female survivors of child maltreatment. Self-compassion may promote resilience, whereas fear of self-compassion may diminish this protective effect. Moreover, distinct facets of self-compassion (e.g., self- kindness) versus self-coldness (e.g., self-judgment) may differentially explain risk or resilience for child maltreatment outcomes. Methods College women (N = 586) completed anonymous online surveys assessing the severity of different types of child maltreatment, self-compassion, fear of self-compassion, depression, anxiety, and stress. Results Severity of sexual, physical, and emotional abuse, and emotional and physical neglect, was positively associated with elevated fear of self-compassion and the absence of self-compassion (i.e., self-coldness). In contrast, emotional abuse and neglect severity were the only maltreatment variables negatively associated with self-compassion. Models indicated an indirect relation between increased maltreatment severity and heightened psychological distress via fear of self-compassion and self-coldness (i.e., isolation, overidentification). Statistical patterns indicative of suppression among the positive facets of self-compassion occurred. -
Verbal Abuse in Upbringing As the Cause of Low Self-Esteem in Children
European Scientific Journal December 2013 /SPECIAL/ edition vol.2 ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431 VERBAL ABUSE IN UPBRINGING AS THE CAUSE OF LOW SELF-ESTEEM IN CHILDREN Jolanta Mackowicz PhD Pedagogical University of Cracow, Poland Abstract In this article I would like to raise the issue of verbal child abuse in relationships between children and people important to them. Parents and teachers are the first role models in a child’s life, therefore their messages have a causative power as they create the image of the “self” in a child, as well as the way of perceiving and valuing themselves. The starting point of my article is the issue of abuse in upbringing, then I discuss the problems of self- esteem and the occurrence of verbal abuse by parents and teachers. In the last part, I present consequences of such experience for the development and life of children. Keywords: Verbal abuse, self-esteem, children Introduction Child abuse in upbringing consists in doing mental and physical harm. The purpose of such abuse is to change the behavior of a child for better. According to Irena Obuchowska, abuse in upbringing is used in order to force children to obey their parents or teachers (Obuchowska, 1989). Therefore, it functions as a specific upbringing tool and parents are motivated by educational purposes only. The most frequent reasons of using violence in child upbringing by parents are contradictory. Considering the fact that upbringing is a process of versatile personality development, including protection of a child against various hazards and limiting the risk of development of negative traits, as well as impartation of values and behavior patterns by personal example, abuse in upbringing seems to be an antinomy. -
Philosophy & Social Criticism
Philosophy & Social Criticism http://psc.sagepub.com/ Apathy: the democratic disease Jeffrey E. Green Philosophy Social Criticism 2004 30: 745 DOI: 10.1177/0191453704045763 The online version of this article can be found at: http://psc.sagepub.com/content/30/5-6/745 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com Additional services and information for Philosophy & Social Criticism can be found at: Email Alerts: http://psc.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://psc.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav >> Version of Record - Dec 6, 2004 What is This? Downloaded from psc.sagepub.com at UNIV OF PENNSYLVANIA on May 6, 2013 12 045763 (to/d) 2/9/04 11:38 am Page 745 Jeffrey E. Green Apathy: the democratic disease Abstract This essay turns to ancient sources in order to rethink the relation- ship between political apathy and democracy. If modern democratic theorists place political apathy entirely outside of democracy – either as a destructive limit upon the full realization of a democratic polity, or, more sanguinely, as a pragmatic necessity which tempers democracy so that it may function in a workable yet watered-down form – the ancients conceived of political apathy as a peculiarly democratic phenomenon that was likely to flourish in tandem with the expansion of egalitarian institutional structures and moral ideas. Evidence for the ancient recognition of political apathy as a uniquely demo- cratic kind of affliction centers on, but is not limited to, three main sources. In literature, the Homeric epic, and specifically the story of Achilles, present apathy for politics and commitment to human equality as synonymous forces. -
Ideals in Dictatorships and Democracies
IDEALS IN DICTATORSHIPS AND DEMOCRACIES W. C. KEIRSTEAD ERMS have both intension and extension of meaning. T In extension dictatorships include Italy, Germany, per haps also Japan and Russia to-day. The dictatorship of the proletariat has turned into a dictatorship over the proletariat, and Stalin takes his place as one of the great triumvirate of living dictators. These dictatorships seem to be extending their power and influence in Europe and in other portions of the globe. The extent of democracy, although yet very large, has been decreasing, and its influence lessening in the world. In its intension dictatorship means a form of government in which absolute authority resides in a supreme leader, as in the countries mentioned, or in a small class. Obedience to such authority is the supreme virtue demanded of all citizens. As a form of social organization, dictatorship is of a military nature; authority flows from the top downward to subordinates, based upon the leadership principle; dominates all social organiza tions and institutions, and conditions the emotions, attitudes and beliefs of individuals. No government can be entirely indifferent to the opinions and emotions of the masses, and on this account dictatorship creates and establishes beliefs and attitudes by propaganda and education. But education is indoctrination, and an appeal to emotional responses of the masses to produce uniformity of feeling, belief and attitudes. As will be indicated later, such a system fails to give a real place to individual freedom or to encourage initiative. Conformity and obedience are the essential virtues of social value. Democracy as a form of political organization is a govern ment which exists by the consent of the governed. -
“One Person, One Vote”: the U.S. Electoral System and the Functional
THE ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE ON ASIA AFFAIRS “One Person, One Vote”: The U.S. Electoral System and the Functional Constituencies Embodied in the Basic Law for the Election of the Chief Executive and of the Legislative Council I. Introduction The Association of the Bar of the City of New York (the “Association”) has had a longstanding interest in preserving the rule of law in Hong Kong, and encouraging its progress to a truly democratic society with universal suffrage as envisaged in Articles 26, 39, 45 and 68 of the Basic Law.1 Accordingly, we view certain recent developments in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China (the “HKSAR”) with great concern, in particular, the recent regressive “interpretations” of the Basic Law by the Central Government of China by which it pre-empted the question of whether there is a “need to amend” the Basic Law regarding the election of the Chief Executive in 2007 and the Legislative Council in 2008, the manner in which such “interpretations” were delivered, and the barrage of intimidating personal attacks by the Central Government against the pro-democracy supporters of universal suffrage which accompanied these “interpretations.” As the debate over constitutional reform in Hong Kong intensified over the course of this year, voices supportive of maintaining the electoral status quo in Hong Kong raised, at certain points, the example of the United States and its electoral system as they argued to reject the rising call in Hong Kong for the more immediate fulfillment of the Basic Law’s promise of “universal suffrage.” It is this reference to the U.S. -
Berkshire District Attorney's Office
Berkshire District Attorney’s Office Bullying Prevention and Social and Emotional Learning Initiative Educator Newsletter Fall 2015 Dear Educator: This newsletter is intended to support your efforts in creating a positive school climate by providing you with information on prevention programs and activities that are current and relevant to students’ own life experiences. We look to research and evidence- based approaches to promote school climate change including mentorship, positive role models, supportive peer groups, and interactive teaching methods. We hope you find the information useful and that the research, lesson plans and resources support your efforts to sustain a welcoming and creative learning environment. Best wishes, David F. Capeless Why Self – Compassion Trumps Self—Esteem Researchers are discovering that self- depression, rumination and perfection- through exercise in a classroom. Visit compassion is even healthier that self- ism. Self-compassion also motivates the National Institute for Trauma and esteem. A growing number of studies personal growth while having an accu- Loss in Children (TLC) for some exam- show that increasing self-esteem is coun- rate view of oneself. Psychologist Kris- ples of activities to promote self- terproductive and actually breeds nega- tin Neff of the University of Texas at compassion within your classroom. tive outcomes such as narcissism. Peo- Austin finds that self-compassion is not ple with high self-esteem are more likely based on self-evaluation of comparison Dr. Neff and fellow researcher Christo- to compare themselves to others to feel to others and therefore has few nega- pher Germer, PhD, developed the Cen- better about themselves. tive characteristics often associated ter for Mindful Self-Compassion offer- with self-esteem. -
Handy Handouts® Beat Bullying!
Handy Handouts® Free, educational handouts for teachers and parents* Number 280 Beat Bullying! by Amber Hodgson, M.A., CCC-SLP Bullying is any type of aggressive behavior that one person (or a group of people) intentionally directs at someone else that causes physical and/or emotional pain. Bullying can be in the form of hitting or punching, but it can also be in the form of name-calling, staring, mocking, social isolation or “silent treatment,” gossiping, taunting about an embarrassing past event, or teasing of others who try to be friends with the victim. A bully might harass another individual about his/her clothes, weight, accent, speech impediment, disability, race, or religion. A type of bullying that is becoming more common is cyberbullying which involves verbal insults or threats that are sent via e-mail or text message or that are posted on social Web sites or blogs. All of these forms of bullying can be very damaging to a young person and can lead to serious problems that can affect his/her mental and physical health, as well as his/her school performance. What You Can Do! Bullying should not be considered a normal part of growing up, and children should not have to deal with the abuse on their own. Here are some ways that adults can help prevent or stop bullying: Communicate. Speak regularly with your children about what they do and who they hang out with on the way to school, during lunchtime, at recess, between classes, in the neighborhood, etc. Frequent communication can help your children feel more comfortable to come to you and talk if they are having a problem with bullying. -
Name Calling
Warning Signs of Abuse: Name Calling Everyone jokes around and teases their family and friends, as well as in dating relationships. However, there’s a line between being playful and insensitive or mean. What happens when “teasing” goes too far? One of the biggest red flags of an unhealthy or abusive relationship is name calling. By verbally stating “you’re bad” in some form -- dumb, ugly, stupid, fat, unloveable -- a dating partner can exert their control and hold power over the other person’s sense of self-worth. Dating partners who use verbally abusive behaviors like name calling will often act as though nothing has happened, because they feel in control after insulting their partner. The systematic criticism is what takes it from name calling to verbal abuse -- it’s a repeated pattern that, over time, can make the victim believe the insults, making it harder for them to leave (“no one will love me because they said so”). Beyond name calling, dating partners exhibiting verbally abusive behaviors may belittle their partner, either privately or publicly, or disguise disparaging comments in jokes. They may follow up comments with more judgment and criticism (“you’re too sensitive”) or act as though what they’ve said is trivial (“I was only joking”). Other examples of name calling include putting someone down, making them feel guilty, or embarrassing and humiliating them. Healthy relationships don’t use name calling to resolve conflict or express love. Both partners compliment or use words to make each other feel good. It’s relaxing and fun, and neither tries to “prove” they are the only ones that will ever love them. -
Definitions Related to Name-Calling, Bullying and Bias
Youth and Cyberbullying: What Families Don t Know Can Hurt Them HANDOUT DEFINITIONS RELATED TO NAME-CALLING, BULLYING AND BIAS Anti-bias: A term to describe the active commitment to challenging prejudice, stereotyping and all forms of discrimination. Bias: An inclination or preference either for or against an individual or group that interferes with impartial judgment. Bullying: Repeated actions or threats of action directed toward a person by one or more people who have (or are perceived to have) more power or status than their target in order to cause fear, distress or harm. Bullying can be physical, verbal, psychological or any combination of these three. Bullying behaviors can include name-calling, obscene gesturing, malicious teasing, rumors, slander, social exclusion, damaging a person s belongings, threats and physical violence. Cyberbullying: A type of bullying that uses the computer or other electronic media to send mean, hurtful or threatening messages or images about another person, to post sensitive, private information about another person for the purpose of hurting or embarrassing the person, to pretend to be someone else in order to make that person look bad and/or to intentionally exclude someone from an online group. Name-calling: The use of language to defame, demean or degrade individuals or groups. Roles in Bias Incidents Ally: Someone who speaks out on behalf of someone else or takes actions that are supportive of someone else. Bystander: Someone who sees something happening and does not say or do anything. Confronter: Someone who speaks out when an incident of bias takes place. The role of confronter can be filled by other people (allies) or by targets themselves. -
SEOUL PLAN of ACTION DEMOCRACY: INVESTING for PEACE and PROSPERITY November 12, 2002
SEOUL PLAN OF ACTION DEMOCRACY: INVESTING FOR PEACE AND PROSPERITY November 12, 2002 We, the Participants in the Second Ministerial Conference of the Community of Democracies held in Seoul on 10-12 November 2002, Affirm that the essential elements of representative democracy in all its forms are: Respect for human rights – civil, political, economic, social and cultural – including freedom of expression, freedom of the press, and freedom of religion and conscience; Access to and free exercise of power in accordance with the rule of law; The holding of periodic free and fair elections based on secret balloting and universal suffrage monitored by independent election authorities; Freedom of association including the right to form independent political parties; separation of powers, especially an independent judiciary; Constitutional subordination of all state institutions, including the military, to the legally-constituted civilian authority. We also reaffirm the Warsaw Declaration which includes our common commitment to the purposes and principles of the UN Charter, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and fundamental principles of international law. Recognizing the universality of these democratic values, the dedication of the Community of Democracies to promote and defend democracy, and the human rights and fundamental freedoms protected under democracy, we are committed to the continuous development of democracy domestically and the promotion of democracy regionally and globally. We, working as individual countries, within our