Natura Impact Report [Post-Consultation] Northern and Western Region RSES – NIR Post Consultation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Natura Impact Report [Post-Consultation] Northern and Western Region RSES – NIR Post Consultation Natura Impact Report [Post-Consultation] Northern and Western Region RSES – NIR Post Consultation TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 2 1.1 SCOPE OF THE NIR .......................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 LAYOUT OF THE NIR ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.3 LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT FOR APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT ......................................................................... 3 2 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................... 5 2.1 GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS ON AA ........................................................................................................ 5 2.2 GUIDING PRINCIPLES AND CASE LAW ................................................................................................. 6 2.3 PURPOSE OF THE AA PROCESS ......................................................................................................... 7 2.4 STAGES OF APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT .............................................................................................. 7 2.5 INFORMATION SOURCES CONSULTED ................................................................................................. 9 2.6 IMPACT PREDICTION........................................................................................................................ 9 2.7 CONSULTATION ............................................................................................................................ 10 3 NORTHERN AND WESTERN RSES ..................................................................................... 23 3.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 23 3.2 THE NORTHERN AND WESTERN REGION OVERVIEW ........................................................................... 23 3.3 STRATEGIC VISION FOR THE NORTHERN AND WESTERN REGION............................................................ 24 3.4 KEY ASPECTS OF THE DRAFT NW RSES............................................................................................. 25 4 OVERVIEW OF THE RECEIVING ENVIRONMENT ................................................................ 28 4.1 IDENTIFICATION OF EUROPEAN SITES ............................................................................................... 28 4.2 CONSERVATION OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................... 33 4.3 CONSERVATION STATUS OF EU PROTECTED HABITATS AND SPECIES ...................................................... 33 4.4 ARTICLE 10 OF THE HABITATS DIRECTIVE AND EX-SITU IMPACTS .......................................................... 35 4.5 EXISTING THREATS AND PRESSURES TO EU PROTECTED HABITATS AND SPECIES ...................................... 36 5 STAGE I SCREENING FOR AA ........................................................................................... 39 5.1 POTENTIAL FOR LIKELY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS ..................................................................................... 39 5.2 SCREENING FOR APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT CONCLUSION................................................................... 39 6 STAGE 2 APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT OF THE DRAFT RSES ............................................... 40 6.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 40 6.2 ASPECTS OF THE PLAN TO BE ASSESSED ............................................................................................ 40 6.3 APPROACH TO ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................................... 41 6.4 IMPACT PREDICTION...................................................................................................................... 41 7 ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS OF DRAFT RSES ....................................................................... 49 7.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 49 MDR1402Rp0013F02 i Northern and Western Region RSES – NIR Post Consultation 7.2 STRATEGIC ANALYSIS (CHAPTER 2 OF THE DRAFT RSES) ...................................................................... 53 7.3 PEOPLE AND PLACE (CHAPTER 3 OF THE DRAFT RSES) ........................................................................ 55 7.4 ECONOMY AND EMPLOYMENT – VIBRANT REGION (CHAPTER 4 OF THE DRAFT RSES) .............................. 92 7.5 ENVIRONMENT - NATURAL REGION (CHAPTER 5 OF THE DRAFT RSES) .................................................. 94 7.6 CONNECTIVITY – CONNECTED REGION (CHAPTER 6 OF THE DRAFT RSES) .............................................. 95 7.7 QUALITY OF LIFE – INCLUSIVE REGION (CHAPTER 7 OF THE DRAFT RSES) ............................................... 98 7.8 INFRASTRUCTURE – ENABLING OUR REGION (CHAPTER 8 OF THE DRAFT RSES) ...................................... 99 7.9 ALL ISLAND COHESION (CHAPTER 9 OF THE DRAFT RSES) .................................................................. 100 7.10 IMPLEMENTATION (CHAPTER 10 OF THE DRAFT RSES) ...................................................................... 101 7.11 ITERATIVE CHANGES MADE TO DRAFT RSES BY NWRA PRIOR TO PUBLIC CONSULTATION ..................... 102 7.12 ASSESSMENT OF IN COMBINATION EFFECTS WITH OTHER PLANS OR PROJECTS ..................................... 104 8 AMENDMENTS TO THE DRAFT RSES .............................................................................. 125 8.1 PROPOSED MATERIAL AMENDMENTS TO DRAFT RSES ...................................................................... 125 8.2 MINOR MODIFICATIONS .............................................................................................................. 125 9 MITIGATION MEASURES/ RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................... 126 9.1 OVERALL MITIGATION STRATEGY ......................................................................................... 126 10 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................... 150 11 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 152 APPENDICES Appendix A Summary of Statutory Consultation Responses (Prior to Draft RSES) Appendix B Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) Northern & Western Region Appendix C Special Protection Areas (SPAs) Northern & Western Region Appendix D Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) Northern Ireland Appendix E Special Protection Areas (SPAs) Northern Ireland Appendix F Screening for Appropriate Assessment Appendix G EU Condition Assessment Appendix H Threats and Pressures Considered Relevant to the RSES Appendix I Assessment of Material Amendments and Other Modifications MDR1402Rp0013F02 ii Northern and Western Region RSES – NIR Post Consultation LIST OF FIGURES Figure 3-1 – Regional Assemblies, and the Northern and Western Region.......................................... 23 Figure 3-2 – Strategic Vision of the Northern and Western Region ..................................................... 25 Figure 4-1 – AA within the Planning Hierarchy of the RSES .................................................................. 30 Figure 4-2 – European Sites within the Zone of Influence of the draft RSES ........................................ 31 Figure 4-3 – European Sites and Hydrological Connectivity in the Northern and Western Region ..... 32 Figure 7-1 - European Sites and Ecological Resources in the Northern & Western Region ................. 54 Figure 9-1 – Hierarchy of Preferred Mitigation Options ..................................................................... 126 LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1 – Summary of Relevant NIR Comments from DCHG in Relation to the Draft RSES .............. 12 Table 2.2 – Summary of Relevant NIR Comments from Other Stakeholders in Relation to the Draft RSES ....................................................................................................................................................... 17 Table 2.3 – Summary of Relevant NIR Comments from DCHG Arising from Proposed Material Amendments ......................................................................................................................................... 18 Table 2.4 – Summary of Relevant NIR Comments from Other Stakeholders Arising from Proposed Material Amendments .......................................................................................................................... 20 Table 4.1 – European Sites within the Zone of Influence of the RSES .................................................. 30 Table 6.1 – Elements of the draft RSES assessed in the NIR ................................................................. 40 Table 6.2 – Potential Ecological Effects Associated with the Policy Objectives Outlined in the NWRA .............................................................................................................................................................. 44 Table 7.1 – Protective Regional Policy Objectives Relevant to European Sites and / or Natura
Recommended publications
  • DRAFT RSES- NWRA NATURA IMPACT REPORT (NIR) Northern and Western Region RSES ‐ NIR
    DRAFT RSES- NWRA NATURA IMPACT REPORT (NIR) Northern and Western Region RSES ‐ NIR TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 SCOPE OF THE NIR .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 APPROACH TO NATURA IMPACT REPORT PREPARATION ........................................................................ 2 1.3 LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT FOR APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT ......................................................................... 2 2 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................... 4 2.1 GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS ON AA ........................................................................................................ 4 2.2 GUIDING PRINCIPLES AND CASE LAW ................................................................................................. 5 2.3 PURPOSE OF THE AA PROCESS ......................................................................................................... 5 2.4 STAGES OF APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT .............................................................................................. 6 2.5 INFORMATION SOURCES CONSULTED ................................................................................................. 7 2.6 IMPACT PREDICTION ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Board Order ABP-307444-20
    Board Order ABP-307444-20 Planning and Development Acts 2000 to 2019 Planning Authority: Dublin City Council Application for permission under section 4 of the Planning and Development (Housing) and Residential Tenancies Act 2016, in accordance with plans and particulars, lodged with An Bord Pleanála on the 16th day of October 2019 by Crekav Trading GP Limited care of Brady Shipman Martin, Canal House, Canal Road, Dublin. Proposed Development: A 10-year planning permission for a strategic housing development located at circa 6.7-hectare site located on lands east of St. Paul’s College, Sybil Hill Road, Raheny, Dublin 5. The site is bound to the north, east and south by St Anne’s Park and to the west by residential development at The Meadows, Sybil Hill House (a protected structure) and St. Paul’s College. Vehicular access to the site is from Sybil Hill Road. The proposed development will consist of: 1. The construction of a residential development with a gross floor area of circa 65,125 square metres (excluding basement parking areas) set out in nine number blocks, ranging in height from five to nine storeys to accommodate 657 number apartments, residential tenant amenity spaces and a crèche. The site will accommodate 499 number car parking spaces, 1,646 number bicycle parking spaces, storage, services and plant areas. Landscaping will include extensive communal amenity areas, and a significant public open space provision. ABP-307444-20 Board Order Page 1 of 22 2. The nine number residential buildings range in height from five storeys to nine storeys accommodating 657 number apartments comprising: • 224 number one-bed units, • 378 number two-bed units and • 55 number three-bed units.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short Guide to Three Dublin City Woodlands
    A SHORT GUIDE TO THREE DUBLIN CITY WOODLANDS St. Anne’s Park Tolka Valley Park Bushy Park Contents Introduction 2 A Brief History of Forests in Ireland 3 Woodland Habitats 7 Woodlands in Dublin City Parks 9 References 22 Above: A field layer in Bushy Park. Photo by Ludovic Beaumont Team Leslie Moore, City Parks Superintendent Maryann Harris, Senior Executive Parks and Landscape Officer Lorraine Bull, Biodiversity Officer Ludovic Beaumont, Tree Officer This Booklet was funded by the Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage through the National Parks and Wildlife Service’s National Biodiversity Action Plan Fund. It is also an action of the Dublin City Biodiversity Action Plan (2016-2020), and the Dublin City Tree Strategy Front cover: St. Anne’s Park. Photograph by Anthony Woods (2016-2021). Above: Beech trees, Bushy park. Photograph by Ludovic Beaumont 1 Introduction A Brief History of Forests in Ireland The lands surrounding Dublin Bay were originally heavily wooded After the last Ice Age (10,000 BP), Ireland before the city was developed. One of Dublin’s Irish names was was initially covered in tundra-like Droom-Choll-Coil that is, “the brow of a hazel-wood”, from an vegetation. As the climate started to abundance of those trees growing about it. warm up 10,000 years ago, the seeds of trees that originated from southern and Woodlands are places visually dominated by trees and urban central Europe were brought to Ireland woodland can be defined as all of the woodlands within the boundary by birds and through wind dispersal of a town or city.
    [Show full text]
  • Environment and Engineering Department Block 1, Floor 6, Civic Offices Christchurch, Dublin 8
    Environment and Engineering Department Block 1, Floor 6, Civic Offices Christchurch, Dublin 8 An Roinn Comhshaoil agus Innealtóireachta Bloc 1,Urlár 6 Oifigí na Cathrach Teampall Chríost, Baile Átha Cliath 8 To Each Member of the Environment & Engineering Strategic Policy Committee Progress Report on Extreme Event Pluvial Flooding 24th October 2011 Report No. 338/2011 to the November Dublin City Council meeting gave an interim report on the extreme pluvial flooding event which affected the East Coast of Ireland and Dublin City on 24th October 2011. This report and accompanying presentation was considered by the Council at the Monthly Meeting held on 7th November 2011 (Report 338/2011 is appended as Appendix 1 of this report). It was agreed that Emergency Motions 1, 2, 3 (Amended), 8 and Motion 64 from the North Central Area Committee be referred to the Environment and Engineering Strategic Policy Committee for further consideration at a meeting of the SPC scheduled for 15th December 2011. This report is intended to : Brief the SPC on progress since Meeting of City Council on 7th November 2011. Brief SPC on meetings with OPW in relation to Capital Funding for Flood Relief Schemes Address motions referred by Council to SPC. Introduction. This report is to be read as a follow up report to the report No. 338/2011 made to the City Council Meeting on 7th November 2011 covering Dublin Flood Risk and interim report on extreme pluvial flooding event affecting the East Coast and Dublin City on 24th October 2011. The cause of the flooding on 23rd and 24th November was extreme pluvial rainfall which exceeded the capacity of the Drainage system and in turn gave rise to fluvial flooding, which was particularly evident in the River Dodder and in the smaller Dublin Rivers especially in the Camac, Poddle, Wad, Bradog, Zoo Stream.
    [Show full text]
  • 2003 Tolka Valley Park Mammals
    THE MAMMAL FAUNA OF THE TOLKA VALLEY PARK AN INITIAL ASSESSMENT OF THE RESIDENT FAUNA For Fingal County Council, Parks Department Daubenton’s bat in bridge over the River Tolka. (c) Brian Keeley 2003 Brian Keeley B.Sc. Hons. in Zool. Mammalogist November 2003 INTRODUCTION It is acknowledged by all environmentalists and ecologists that in order to ensure that native fauna may flourish, it is essential that there is a mechanism for continuity provided for interchange between naturally accessible parts of the species’ range. For many mammals, this means of continuity is provided in two main ways: vegetation corridors (hedgerow, trees, scrub) and waterways. Tolka Valley Park provides a link between suburban and rural areas of Fingal. The river itself creates a natural channel for the movement of aquatic or semi-aquatic mammals. The riverside vegetation and the remnant greenery that has survived on the flood plain of the river serves as the vegetation corridor, dwelling and resting place for mammals necessary to sustain and allow the movement of these survivors of increasing urbanisation. To appreciate what the resident fauna of this relatively new park is, it is necessary to examine the site in a number of ways. Different mammals are located by the use of different techniques. This current assessment looked at the bat fauna and the non-volant fauna by different means. Bats were sought during the summer period by means of a bat detector survey. Non-volant mammals were investigated by a walk-through of the Park to identify their tracks etc. rather than any visual determinations.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Landscape Names
    Irish Landscape Names Preface to 2010 edition Stradbally on its own denotes a parish and village); there is usually no equivalent word in the Irish form, such as sliabh or cnoc; and the Ordnance The following document is extracted from the database used to prepare the list Survey forms have not gained currency locally or amongst hill-walkers. The of peaks included on the „Summits‟ section and other sections at second group of exceptions concerns hills for which there was substantial www.mountainviews.ie The document comprises the name data and key evidence from alternative authoritative sources for a name other than the one geographical data for each peak listed on the website as of May 2010, with shown on OS maps, e.g. Croaghonagh / Cruach Eoghanach in Co. Donegal, some minor changes and omissions. The geographical data on the website is marked on the Discovery map as Barnesmore, or Slievetrue in Co. Antrim, more comprehensive. marked on the Discoverer map as Carn Hill. In some of these cases, the evidence for overriding the map forms comes from other Ordnance Survey The data was collated over a number of years by a team of volunteer sources, such as the Ordnance Survey Memoirs. It should be emphasised that contributors to the website. The list in use started with the 2000ft list of Rev. these exceptions represent only a very small percentage of the names listed Vandeleur (1950s), the 600m list based on this by Joss Lynam (1970s) and the and that the forms used by the Placenames Branch and/or OSI/OSNI are 400 and 500m lists of Michael Dewey and Myrddyn Phillips.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Areas (Nhas) for Bryophytes: Selection Criteria
    ISSN 1393 – 6670 N A T I O N A L P A R K S A N D W I L D L I F E S ERVICE Natural Heritage Areas (NHAs) for Bryophytes: Selection Criteria Christina Campbell and Neil Lockhart I R I S H W I L D L I F E M ANUAL S 100 Natural Heritage Areas (NHAs) for Bryophytes: Selection Criteria Christina Campbell & Neil Lockhart National Parks and Wildlife Service, 7 Ely Place, Dublin, D02 TW98 Keywords: Natural Heritage Area, designation, bryophyte, moss, liverwort, site protection Citation: Campbell, C. & Lockhart, N. (2017) Natural Heritage Areas (NHAs) for Bryophytes: Selection Criteria. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 100. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. The NPWS Project Officer for this report was: Dr Neil Lockhart; [email protected] Irish Wildlife Manuals Series Editors: Brian Nelson, Áine O Connor & David Tierney © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2017 ISSN 1393 – 6670 IWM 100 (2017) Natural Heritage Areas for Bryophytes Contents Contents ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................................ 1 1. Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fingal Development Plan 2017-2023
    April_Adopted_Flood_Cover_crop.pdf 1 29/03/2017 14:35:07 C M Y CM MY CY CMY K Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for the Fingal Development Plan 2017-2023 March 2017 SFRA - Fingal County Development Plan 2017-2023 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 REPORT OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 DISCLAIMER & BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION ..................................................................................... 1 1.3.1 Disclaimer .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.3.2 Best Available Information ................................................................................................ 2 1.4 REPORT STRUCTURE ......................................................................................................................... 3 2 STUDY AREA .................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 WATERCOURSES.............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B. List of Special Areas of Conservation and Special Protection Areas
    Appendix B. List of Special Areas of Conservation and Special Protection Areas Irish Water | Draft Framework Plan. Natura Impact Statement Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) in the Republic of Ireland Site code Site name 000006 Killyconny Bog (Cloghbally) SAC 000007 Lough Oughter and Associated Loughs SAC 000014 Ballyallia Lake SAC 000016 Ballycullinan Lake SAC 000019 Ballyogan Lough SAC 000020 Black Head-Poulsallagh Complex SAC 000030 Danes Hole, Poulnalecka SAC 000032 Dromore Woods and Loughs SAC 000036 Inagh River Estuary SAC 000037 Pouladatig Cave SAC 000051 Lough Gash Turlough SAC 000054 Moneen Mountain SAC 000057 Moyree River System SAC 000064 Poulnagordon Cave (Quin) SAC 000077 Ballymacoda (Clonpriest and Pillmore) SAC 000090 Glengarriff Harbour and Woodland SAC 000091 Clonakilty Bay SAC 000093 Caha Mountains SAC 000097 Lough Hyne Nature Reserve and Environs SAC 000101 Roaringwater Bay and Islands SAC 000102 Sheep's Head SAC 000106 St. Gobnet's Wood SAC 000108 The Gearagh SAC 000109 Three Castle Head to Mizen Head SAC 000111 Aran Island (Donegal) Cliffs SAC 000115 Ballintra SAC 000116 Ballyarr Wood SAC 000129 Croaghonagh Bog SAC 000133 Donegal Bay (Murvagh) SAC 000138 Durnesh Lough SAC 000140 Fawnboy Bog/Lough Nacung SAC 000142 Gannivegil Bog SAC 000147 Horn Head and Rinclevan SAC 000154 Inishtrahull SAC 000163 Lough Eske and Ardnamona Wood SAC 000164 Lough Nagreany Dunes SAC 000165 Lough Nillan Bog (Carrickatlieve) SAC 000168 Magheradrumman Bog SAC 000172 Meenaguse/Ardbane Bog SAC 000173 Meentygrannagh Bog SAC 000174 Curraghchase Woods SAC 000181 Rathlin O'Birne Island SAC 000185 Sessiagh Lough SAC 000189 Slieve League SAC 000190 Slieve Tooey/Tormore Island/Loughros Beg Bay SAC 000191 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Ireland (EI)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for Republic of Ireland (EI) Summits on the Air Republic of Ireland (EI) Association Reference Manual Issue Number 1.10 Date of Issue 01-Mar-2003 Participation start date 15-Mar-2003 Authorised John Linford G3WGV Date 03-Feb-2003 Association Manager Joe Ryan EI7GY Regional Managers Joe Fadden EI3IX, John Desmond EI7GL, Joe Ryan EI7GY, Tom Rea EI2GP Management Team G0HJQ, G3CWI, G3WGV, M5EVT Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. The source data used in the Marilyn lists herein is copyright of E D Clemens and Dave Hewitt and is used with their permission. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 26 Issue 1.10 Summits on the Air – ARM for Republic of Ireland (EI) Table of contents 1 CHANGE CONTROL.................................................................................................................................3 2 ASSOCIATION REFERENCE DATA......................................................................................................4 2.1 PROGRAMME DERIVATION .....................................................................................................................4 2.2 PURPOSE OF THE SOTA PROGRAMME ...................................................................................................5 2.3 RULES FOR ACTIVATORS .......................................................................................................................5 2.4 RULES FOR
    [Show full text]
  • National Report of Ireland (MOP3)
    / FORMAT FOR REPORTS OF THE PARTIES 1 AGREEMENT ON THE CONSERVATION OF AFRICAN-EURASIAN MIGRATORY WATERBIRDS (The Hague, 1995) Implementation during the period …2002…… to…2005…… Contracting Party: Ireland Designated AEWA Administrative Authority: National Parks & Wildlife Service Full name of the institution: Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government Name and title of the head of the institution: Christopher O’Grady Mailing address: 7 Ely Place, Dublin 2 Telephone: 00 353 1 8883228 Fax: 00 353 1 8883276 Email: chris_o’[email protected] Name and title (if different) of the designated contact officer for AEWA matters: Josephine Walsh Mailing address (if different) for the designated contact officer: Telephone: 00 353 1 888 3221 Fax: 00 353 1 888 3276 Email: [email protected] This report was prepared by the National Parks and Wildlife Service of the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government. Two non-governmental organisations, BirdWatch Ireland (BWI) and the National Association of Regional Game Councils (NARGC), were invited to provide comments and input in the preparation of this report. 2 Their contributions are gratefully acknowledged. 3 Table of Contents 1. Overview of Action Plan implementation 6 2. Species conservation 9 Legal measures 9 Single Species Action Plans 11 Emergency measures 12 Re-establishments 12 Introductions 12 3. Habitat conservation 14 Habitat inventories 14 Conservation of areas 14 Rehabilitation and restoration 18 4. Management of human activities 19 Hunting 19 Eco-tourism 20 Other human activities 20 5. Research and monitoring 22 Status of research and monitoring programmes for species 22 6. Education and information 24 Training and development programmes 24 Raising public awareness 24 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Cashel Outlet, Falcarragh, Co. Donegal in Accordance with Article
    AA SCREENING DETERMINATION Of Water Networks Programme – Cashel Outlet, Falcarragh, Co. Donegal In accordance with Article 6(3) of the EU Habitats Directive (Directive 92/43/EEC) and Regulation 42(1) of the European Communities (Birds and Natural Habitats) Regulations 2011 as amended, Irish Water has undertaken Appropriate Assessment screening to assess, in view of best scientific knowledge and the conservation objectives of the European Site(s), if the project, individually or in combination with other plans or projects is likely to have a significant effect on a European Site(s). In this context, particular attention was paid to the European Site(s) listed below: (000140) Fawnboy Bog/Lough Nacung SAC, (000147) Horn Head and Rinclevan SAC, (000185) Sessiagh Lough SAC, (001090) Ballyness Bay SAC, (001141) Gweedore Bay and Islands SAC, (001179) Muckish Mountain SAC, (001190) Sheephaven SAC, (002047) Cloghernagore Bog and Glenveagh National Park SAC, (002259) Tory Island Coast SAC, (004039) Derryveagh and Glendowan Mountains SPA, (004073) Tory Island SPA, (004083) Inishbofin, Inishdooey and Inishbeg SPA, (004149) Falcarragh to Meenlaragh SPA, (004150) West Donegal Coast SPA, (004194) Horn Head to Fanad Head SPA, (004230) West Donegal Islands SPA. In accordance with Regulation 42(7) of the European Communities (Birds and Natural Habitats) Regulations 2011 as amended, Irish Water has made a determination following screening that an Appropriate Assessment is not required as the project is not directly connected with or necessary to the management of the Site(s) as European Site(s) and as it can be concluded, on the basis of objective information, that the project, individually or in combination with other plans or projects is not likely to have a significant effect on the European Site(s) listed above.
    [Show full text]