DOCSLIB.ORG

Privacy, Disclosure, and Social Exchange Theory by Jennifer King

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Privacy, Disclosure, and Social Exchange Theory by Jennifer King Privacy, Disclosure, and Social Exchange Theory by Jennifer King A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Information Management and Systems in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Deirdre K. Mulligan, Chair Professor Coye Cheshire Professor David Wagner Professor Steven Weber Spring 2018 Privacy, Disclosure, and Social Exchange Theory Copyright 2018 by Jennifer King 1 Abstract Privacy, Disclosure, and Social Exchange Theory by Jennifer King Doctor of Philosophy in Information Management and Systems University of California, Berkeley Professor Deirdre K. Mulligan, Chair Maintaining the privacy of one’s personal information—one’s choice of when to disclose it and to whom, how one maintains control over it, and the risks of disclosure—is one of the most important social issues of the internet era. For the past decade, privacy researchers have focused on several domains, including: documenting public opinion about privacy attitudes and expectations; understanding how user interfaces affect disclosure; and focusing on understanding interpersonal privacy dynamics within social media settings, to name a few. All of this work shares the goal of furthering our collective understanding of how people think about information privacy in online settings, what they expect when disclosing their personal information, and why they make the disclosure choices they make. A common element missing from the extant privacy research is an accounting of social structures. More specifically, as researchers consider the various factors that affect personal disclosure, they often do not consider the relationship between the discloser and the recipient, and how aspects of that relationship may directly or indirectly affect one’s decision to disclose. A specific form of relationship I examine here is that between individuals and the companies to whom they disclose their personal information. This dissertation explores how the structure of relationships between individuals and compa- nies influences individuals’ decisions to disclose personal information. I accomplish this though a mixed-methods approach; first, I conducted twenty exploratory qualitative interviews with ten users of the 23andMe genetic testing service and ten women who used mobile apps to track their pregnancies. I interviewed all twenty participants about their experiences using online search en- gines. I then conducted three online survey experiments, using a hypothetical wearable fitness device that collects personal information as the premise of the study. The experiments tested a set of hypotheses and further explored themes that emerged from the qualitative research. These studies examine the ways in which the relationship between individuals and the compa- nies they disclose to, and in particular the distribution of power within the relationship, affects the individuals’ decisions to disclose. I use social exchange theory (SET) as the theoretical framework for this inquiry because the transfer of personal information in exchange for a service is an ex- change between social actors. Thus, SET provides an empirically tested scaffolding for exploring 2 key features of these relationships and their impact on the normative aspects of exchange that affect disclosure choices, specifically: individuals’ perceptions of trust, fairness, power, and privacy. This dissertation forges new ground in the analysis of information privacy and personal dis- closure. Namely, the results of my mixed-method studies demonstrate the utility of the relational analytic approach for identifying social structural factors that affect personal disclosure. Further, it demonstrates the influence of power on personal disclosure—the extent to which individuals can control the terms under which personal information is exchanged, the options available to them to obtain similar resources elsewhere, how fair the exchange is, and the extent to which individuals benefit from it. This approach yields a different set of insights into the dynamic of personal disclo- sure and information privacy. It reveals the impact of power differentials on personal disclosure, demonstrating that imbalances in power between individuals and companies can affect individual decisions to disclose. i To my stars and moon: Deneb, Seren, and Sashi Thank you for all the love in the universe, and for your support through this crazy journey. ii Contents Contents ii List of Figures viii List of Tables ix 1 Introduction and Literature Review 1 1.1 Introduction . 1 1.2 Problem Space . 1 1.3 Research Motivations . 2 1.3.1 Research Focus . 3 1.3.2 Dissertation Structure . 3 1.4 Related Literature . 3 1.4.1 Information Privacy . 4 1.4.2 Privacy as Control . 5 1.4.2.1 Research Based on Privacy As Control . 6 1.4.2.2 Privacy As A Rational Calculus . 7 1.4.3 The Privacy Paradox . 8 1.4.4 Privacy and Behavioral Economics . 10 1.4.4.1 Economics of Privacy . 11 1.4.5 Privacy as Contextual Integrity . 12 1.5 Social Exchange Theory . 14 1.5.1 Forms of Exchange . 15 1.5.1.1 Direct Negotiated Binding Exchange . 16 1.5.1.2 Direct Reciprocal Exchange . 16 1.5.1.3 Generalized Exchange . 16 1.5.2 The Object of Exchange . 16 1.5.3 Assurances and SET . 18 1.5.4 Power and SET . 18 2 Motivations, Research Questions, and Study Hypotheses 21 2.1 Interleaving SET and Privacy . 21 iii 2.2 Motivating the Studies . 24 2.2.1 Qualitative Study . 24 2.2.1.1 Interview Contexts . 24 2.2.1.2 Qualitative Research Questions . 25 2.2.2 Experimental Survey . 25 2.2.2.1 The Paradox of Control . 26 2.2.2.2 Experimental Research Questions . 27 2.3 Study One: Hypotheses . 27 2.3.1 Trust . 28 2.3.2 Power . 28 2.3.3 Fairness . 29 2.3.4 Privacy . 29 2.4 Studies 2A and 2B . 30 2.4.1 Hypotheses . 30 3 Qualitative Methods 32 3.1 Study Overview . 32 3.1.1 Study Context . 32 3.1.1.1 Pregnancy Tracking Apps . 33 3.1.1.2 Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing (DTCGT) . 34 3.1.1.3 23andMe Company Background . 34 3.1.1.4 Genetic Testing Process . 35 3.2 Participant Recruitment . 36 3.2.1 Search Interviews . 37 3.2.2 Interview Instrument . 37 3.2.3 Contextual Questions . 38 3.2.4 SET Thematic Questions . 40 3.2.4.1 Relationships . 41 3.2.4.2 Fairness and Benefits . 41 3.2.4.3 Reciprocity and Negotiation . 42 3.2.4.4 Assurances . 42 3.2.4.5 Personal Disclosure . 44 3.2.4.6 Risks and Trade-Offs . 44 3.2.5 Interviews . 45 3.2.6 Data Analysis . 46 3.2.7 Generalizability and Limitations . 46 4 Qualitative Interview Findings 48 4.1 Overview . 48 4.2 Interviews: Setting the Context . 49 4.2.1 Pregnancy Tracking Apps . 50 4.2.1.1 Selecting Pregnancy Applications . 50 iv 4.2.1.2 Company and App Impressions . 50 4.2.1.3 Personal Disclosure and Revealing the Pregnancy . 51 4.2.2 Genetic Testing . 52 4.2.2.1 Motivations for Genetic Testing . 52 4.2.2.2 Participant Impressions of 23andMe . 53 4.2.2.3 Complicating Social Norms . 54 4.2.3 Search Engines . 55 4.2.3.1 Evolving Search Norms . 56 4.2.4 Summary . 56 4.3 Social Exchange Theory and Relationships . 57 4.3.1 The Nature of the Relationship . 57 4.3.2 Pregnancy Tracking . 58 4.3.3 Genetic Testing . 60 4.3.4 Search Queries . 61 4.3.5 Summary . 62 4.3.6 Benefits and Fairness . 64 4.3.6.1 Pregnancy Tracking . 65 4.3.6.2 Genetic Testing . 66 4.3.6.3 Search Queries . 68 4.3.6.4 Summary . 71 4.3.7 Assurances and Trust . 72 4.3.7.1 Pregnancy Tracking . 72 4.3.7.2 Institutional Assurances . 74 4.3.7.3 Genetic Testing . 75 4.3.7.4 Institutional Assurances . 76 4.3.7.5 Search Queries . 76 4.3.7.6 Institutional Assurances . 77 4.3.7.7 Summary . 78 4.4 Privacy: Personal Disclosure, Risk, and Trade-Offs . 79 4.4.1 Personal Disclosure . 79 4.4.1.1 Pregnancy Tracking . ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Social Exchange Processes in Leisure and Non-Leisure Settings: a Review and Exploratory Investigation
    Journal of Leisure Research Copyright 1997 1997, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 183-200 National Recreation and Park Association Social Exchange Processes in Leisure and Non-leisure Settings: A Review and Exploratory Investigation Christopher J. Auld School of Leisure Studies, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia AlanJ. Case School of Education, Coastal Carolina University Social interaction is among the most frequently reported reasons for partici- pation in leisure. However, little is known about the nature of social interaction processes in leisure settings and whether these are different than those occur- ring in non-leisure contexts (or if they vary in different leisure contexts). This paper examines the potential contributions of social exchange theory to the study of leisure behaviour, and presents the results of an exploratory investi- gation which utilized social exchange theory to examine resource exchange occurring in both leisure and non-leisure settings. Overall differences in per- ceptions about resource exchange in leisure and non-leisure contexts existed among respondents, and males and females had different perceptions of the resource exchange occurring in a leisure setting. The results suggest that social exchange theory provides a promising means to develop further understanding of the social aspects of leisure behaviour and, in turn, assist the continuing formulation of leisure theory through integration with other theoretical ap- proaches. KEYWORDS: Social exchange theory, social interaction, leisure behaviour Introduction A major reason for participation in leisure activities is "social interac- tion" (Crandall, Nolan & Morgan, 1980; de Grazia, 1962; Iso-Ahola, 1980, 1989; Kaplan, 1960; Samdahl, 1988, 1992; Shaw, 1984). However, operational terms such as "friendship", "making new friends" and "socialising", shed little light on why social interaction is an important intrinsic reward from leisure involvement.
    [Show full text]
  • Critique and Cognitive Capacities
    Article Philosophy and Social Criticism 1–24 Critique and cognitive ª The Author(s) 2021 capacities: Towards an Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions DOI: 10.1177/0191453720987864 action-oriented model journals.sagepub.com/home/psc Magnus Ho¨rnqvist Stockholm University, Sweden Abstract In response to an impasse, articulated in the late 1980s, the cognitive capacities of ordinary people assumed central place in contemporary critical social theory. The participants’ perspective gained precedence over scientific standards branded as external. The notion of cognition, however, went unchallenged. This article continues the move away from external standards, and discusses two models of critique, which differ based on their underlying notions of cognition. The representa- tional model builds on cognitive content, misrecognition and normativity; three features which are illustrated with positions adopted by prominent exponents of critical social theory. An alternative understanding relies on action-oriented disclosure and the participants’ basic familiarity with the social world. On this reading, what clashes with unequal structures is skilful coping, rather than representations and normative standards. The action-oriented approach may overcome the dilemma of understanding both the impact and the possible transcendence of unequal structures, although it cannot ultimately replace representational critique. Keywords action-oriented cognition, Bourdieu, cognitive capacities, critique, Heidegger, Honneth, power The role attributed to ordinary people’s cognitive capacities within critical social theory has undergone a decisive change since the 1980s. The change has been described as a move from ‘external’ to ‘immanent’ critique, which values the participants’ perspective over against the perspective of the scientific observer.1 The multitude of opinions close to everyday life gained precedence over theorizing at higher levels of abstraction.
    [Show full text]
  • Exchange Theory in Classical Sociology Thought John Hamlin Department of Sociology and Anthropology UMD
    Exchange Theory in Classical Sociology Thought John Hamlin Department of Sociology and Anthropology UMD Warshay, in The Current State of Sociological theory (1975), characterizes exchange theory as one of the “eight large theories.” Yet Heath (1971:91) informs us that the only agreement sociologists have concerning which particular theorists should be considered under this heading are, G.C. Homans, Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms (1961) and P.M. Blau, Exchange an Power in Social Life (1964). The problem with concentrating on these specific works of Homans and Blau are that they result in a view of exchange theory as uniquely individualistic, totally ignoring collectivistic exchange theory. It is indeed interesting that very little of significance has been added to this approach in since Homans classic statement. Milan Zafirovski (2003) has provided a good summery of the updates of exchange theory. For the most part, the theory has changed very little. One reason collectivistic exchange theory is ignored in the United States stems from the fact that it is primarily found in European Anthropology. Another reason derives out of the focus given the examination of exchange theory. At times it is seen as an extension of or in contrast to, economic exchange al la Adam Smith. Or as a reaction of dominate theories in the U.S. during the 1950s and 1960s. Mulkay, for example, interprets Homans’ exchange theory as developing in reaction to the functionalist theories of Parsons and others (1971:3). Blau’s attempts at theory construction are perceived as an extension and further development of Homans’ theory (Mulkay 1971:3).
    [Show full text]
  • SOCIAL EXCHANGE Advances in Theory and Research SOCIAL EXCHANGE Advances in Theory and Research
    SOCIAL EXCHANGE Advances in Theory and Research SOCIAL EXCHANGE Advances in Theory and Research EDITED BY KENNETH J. GERGEN Swarthmore College Swarthmore, Pennsylvania AND MARTIN S. GREENBERG AND RICHARD H. WILLIS University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania PLENUM PRESS • NEW YORK AND LONDON Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 80-18170 ISBN-13:978-1-4613-3089-9 e-ISBN -13:978-1-4613-3087-5 DOl: 10.1007/978-1-4613-3087-5 © 1980 Plenum Press, New York Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1980 A Division of Plenum Publishing Corporation 227 West 17th Street, New York, N.Y. 10011 All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming recording, or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher Contributors HARUMI BEFU, Department of Anthropology, Stanford University, Stanford, California EDNA B. FOA, Department of Psychiatry, Temple University Health Sciences Center, Eastern Pennsylvania Psychiatric Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania URIEL G. FOA, Department of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania IRENE HANSON FRIEZE, Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania HOWARD L. FROMKIN, Department of Psychology, York University, Downsview, Ontario, Canada KENNETH]. GERGEN, Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, Pennsylvania NELSON H. H. GRABURN, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley, California MARTIN S. GREENBERG, Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania EDWIN P. HOLLANDER, Department of Psychology, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York L. ROWELL HUESMANN, Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago Circle, Chicago, Illinois GERALD S.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Naturalism and Religion: Philosophical Essays Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    BETWEEN NATURALISM AND RELIGION: PHILOSOPHICAL ESSAYS PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Jürgen Habermas | 344 pages | 10 Jun 2008 | Polity Press | 9780745638256 | English | Oxford, United Kingdom Between Naturalism and Religion: Philosophical Essays PDF Book Skip to main content. Swindal James F. Show More. Between Naturalism and Religion: Philosophical Essays. The observer perspective does not undermine the participant perspective if we can show that the two are complementary but irreducible, and then show how perspectival dualism is itself "part of our nature. Average rating 3. Bohman Jeremy J. The tension between naturalism and religion is the central theme of this major new book by Jrgen Habermas. Please login or register to read this article. Like Rorty and other pragmatists, Habermas has come to believe that religion is not going away, and that it is better engaged within its moderate forms, especially when fundamentalism seems resurgent. Charlie Stephen rated it really liked it Mar 13, There is a nice convergence here between the philosophical task Habermas sets himself in working out the self-critical relation of reason to religion in Chapter 8 and the burden placed on secular citizens in a "postsecular society. He also views 'modernized' religions as partners in the public sphere to combat the results of uncontrolled capitalism and reductionist, simple-minded thinking. Sign in to use this feature. Deven rated it really liked it Apr 29, Hyung S. Ciaran P. See all jobs. In Chapter 2, for example, Davidson is criticized for analyzing language from the perspective of an empirical theorist making behavioral observations Political Theory - Habermas and Rawls Loading Have your say Log in or register to post comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Exchange Theory Mark V
    English Technical Reports and White Papers English 2015 Social Exchange Theory Mark V. Redmond Iowa State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/engl_reports Part of the Interpersonal and Small Group Communication Commons Recommended Citation Redmond, Mark V., "Social Exchange Theory" (2015). English Technical Reports and White Papers. 5. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/engl_reports/5 This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the English at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in English Technical Reports and White Papers by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Social Exchange Theory Communication Context Interpersonal, Small Group, and Organizational Questions It Addresses in Our Every Day Lives: 1. How do we go about making decisions about what are willing to we give up (time, freedom, money) in order to gain something (love, services, goods)?. 2. What factors influence our decisions to pursue, sustain, or terminate a relationship? 3. Why do we feel resentment when we feel we’ve put more into a relationship or sacrificed more to sustain it than our partner? Theory in a Nutshell ● Social behavior often involves social exchanges where people are motivated to attain some valued reward for which they must forfeit something of value (cost). ● We seek profits in our exchanges such that rewards are greater than the costs. ● We are disturbed when there is not equity in an exchange or where others are rewarded more for the same costs we incurred.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 World and Paradigm in Heidegger and Kuhn Mateo Belgrano Universidad Católica Argentina – CONICET Buenos Aires, Argentina Ab
    World and Paradigm in Heidegger and Kuhn Mateo Belgrano Universidad Católica Argentina – CONICET Buenos Aires, Argentina Para citar este artículo: Belgrano, Mateo. «World and Paradigm in Heidegger and Kuhn». Franciscanum 175, Vol. 63 (2021): 1-16. Abstract The aim of this article is to compare Heidegger's philosophy of science with that of Thomas Kuhn. This comparison has two objectives: 1) to use Kuhn's conceptual arsenal to make Heidegger's position clearer; and 2) to show that Heidegger's and Kuhn's positions are not as different as might be expected. Consequently, I may suggest that these philosophies can be compatible. I will show that while there are differences, also there are many continuities. I will address three issues: 1) the differences and similarities between Kuhn's notion of the paradigm and Heidegger's notion of the world; 2) the analogous concepts of «normal science» and «calculating thought»; and 3) the source of intelligibility in both authors. The main difference between the two thinkers, I believe, lies therein. Keywords Science, Paradigm, World, Being, Thinking. Mundo y paradigma en Heidegger y Kuhn Resumen Mi objetivo en este artículo es comparar la filosofía de la ciencia de Heidegger con la de Thomas Kuhn. Con esta comparación quiero perseguir dos objetivos: 1) usar el arsenal conceptual de Kuhn para hacer más clara la posición de Heidegger; y 2) mostrar que las posiciones de Heidegger y Kuhn no son tan diferentes como cabría esperar. Por lo tanto, La presente investigación es parte del proyecto de investigación Cuestiones fundamentales de Filosofía contemporánea: Lenguaje, praxis, cuerpo y poder, a cargo del Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Review
    ABSTRACT MURPHY, MAURA JEAN. Contingent Faculty: What Impacts their Organizational Commitment? (Under the direction of Alyssa N. Bryant.) Since the 1980s, the percentage of non-tenured faculty has increased on college campuses. However, while contingent faculty are often hired to address short-term staffing issues, the long-term impacts are not assessed. Institutions need a better understanding of how institutional practices impact the job performance of contingent faculty. The purpose of this study is to examine what institutional practices predict organizational commitment among contingent faculty, compared to tenured/tenure-track faculty. While several studies conclude that contingent faculty are less committed than tenured/tenure-track faculty, there is little data to suggest how institutional practices may be impacting the organizational commitment of contingent faculty. Using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Ordinary Least Squared (OLS) regression, this study seeks to understand how part-time contingent faculty and full-time contingent faculty each compare to tenured/tenure-track faculty in their level of organizational commitment at four-year institutions. Additionally, what institutional practices, particularly relating to recognition, support, compensation, and shared governance, predict organizational commitment among full- and part-time contingent faculty? While the findings are somewhat mixed, there is evidence to support the hypothesis of the study that institutional practices relating to recognition, support, and compensation build the organizational commitment of contingent faculty. Contingent Faculty: What Impacts their Organizational Commitment? by Maura Jean Murphy A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of North Carolina State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Education Higher Education Administration Raleigh, North Carolina 2009 APPROVED BY: _______________________ _______________________ James E.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploration of Appropriate and Inappropriate E-Disclosure: a Qualitative Investigation of the Decision-Making Process of Counselors in Training
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations 2016 Exploration Of Appropriate And Inappropriate E- Disclosure: A Qualitative Investigation Of The Decision-Making Process Of Counselors In Training Katherine H. DeWitt University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the Counselor Education Commons Recommended Citation DeWitt, K. H.(2016). Exploration Of Appropriate And Inappropriate E-Disclosure: A Qualitative Investigation Of The Decision-Making Process Of Counselors In Training. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/3967 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EXPLORATION OF APPROPRIATE AND INAPPROPRIATE E-DISCLOSURE: A QUALITATIVE INVESTIGATION OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS OF COUNSELORS IN TRAINING. by Katherine H. DeWitt Bachelor of Science Stephen F. Austin State University, 2004 Master of Education Lamar University, 2011 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Counselor Education College of Education University of South Carolina 2016 Accepted by: Joshua Gold, Major Professor Moody Crews, Committee Member Dodie Limberg, Committee Member Christine Blake, Committee Member Cheryl L. Addy, Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School © Copyright by Katherine H. DeWitt, 2016 All Rights Reserved. ii DEDICATION Dedicated in loving memory to… My Grandparents: Dr. & Mrs. Richard O. Cannon II and Mr. & Mrs. Jacob H. DeWitt You gave me roots to know who I am and where I am from, and branches that I may see and know the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontology and World Politics
    Downloaded by [University of Defence] at 01:54 24 May 2016 ‘With a level of philosophical sophistication rarely found in the discipline of international relations, Sergei Prozorov’s texts issue challenges that no one interested in politics in general and global politics in particular should ignore.’ Michael J. Shapiro, University of Hawai’i Manoa, USA ‘Taken together, Ontology and World Politics and Theory of the Political Subject represent the most ambitious re-articulation of the ontological and ethical foundations of universalism to date by one of the most brilliant and provocative scholars of his generation. I can thus warmly recommend these volumes to anyone with an interest in cutting-edge international political theory.’ Jens Bartelson, Professor of Political Science, Lund University, Sweden ‘Drawing on a wide range of sources in political theory and philosophy, Prozorov develops a novel and ambitious defense of universalism. He does so not against, but through approaches that critique global models for their hegemonic and excluding nature. The result is a re-articulation of universalism that seeks to affi rm difference and plurality through concepts of community, equality and freedom.’ Roland Bleiker, Professor of International Relations, School of Political Science and International Studies, University of Queensland, Australia Downloaded by [University of Defence] at 01:54 24 May 2016 This page intentionally left blank Downloaded by [University of Defence] at 01:54 24 May 2016 ONTOLOGY AND WORLD POLITICS Together these two companion volumes develop an innovative theory of world politics, grounded in the reinterpretation of the concepts of ‘world’ and ‘politics’ from an ontological perspective. In the discipline of international relations the concept of world politics remains ambivalent, functioning both as a synonym of international relations and its antonym, denoting the aspirations for overcoming interstate pluralism in favour of a universalist politics of the global community or the world state.
    [Show full text]
  • Homans' Social Exchange Theory and Gang Violence Presley Halen
    Homans’ Social Exchange Theory and Gang Violence Presley Halen Alford Introduction Conclusion: Homans’ Social Exchange theory outlines the Homans’ Social Exchange Theory examines behavioral modification through the effects of costs and rewards on human behavior. means of costs and rewards. Behaviors that are rewarded will become While, Social Exchange Theory has often been persistent, whereas behaviors that result in a costs will end. The principles of Homans’ Social Exchange Theory enable social scientists to understand applied to perpetuating conformist ideology, this behavioral modifications. Society has numerous sanctions that reward conformity research applies costs and rewards to the and punish deviance, therefore perpetuating conformist ideology. However, in the continuation of gang counterculture. Violent value context of gang counterculture, internal sanctions promote deviance. Thus, systems operate using costs and rewards as Homans’ Social Exchange Theory can be applied to large scale society in both internal sanctions, thus, resulting in behavioral the context of deviance and conformity. Just as with conformity, when deviant modifications within deviant populations. behavior is rewarded, it persists. Within a gang environment, juveniles are rewarded for deviant acts, thus, perpetuating criminality through the process of behavioral modification. Homans’ Social Exchange Theory is applicable to Coverage research as it enables social scientists to understand both conformists and • Included Materials: deviant ideology and from where these behaviors stem. •This presentation includes original literature authored by George C. Homans’ as means to apply his theory Significance from an undiluted perspective. • Gang violence is largely misunderstood and misrepresented by statistics •This presentation also includes • Recognizing the counterculture that exists within gangs, both enables and government statistics regarding gang promotes a greater understanding of violence prevalence and perspectives from peer reviewed journals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University the Graduate School College Of
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Information Sciences and Technology AN EXPLORATION OF CONTEMPORARY KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER ISSUES IN HIGH-TECH OUTSOURCING USING SOCIAL EXCHANGE THEORY A Thesis in Information Sciences and Technology by Suwan Juntiwasarakij © 2010 Suwan Juntiwasarakij Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Master of Science May 2010 The thesis of Suwan Juntiwasarakij was reviewed and approved* by the following: Eileen M. Trauth Professor of Information Sciences and Technology Thesis Advisor Carleen F. Maitland Associate Professor of Information Sciences and Technology Angsana Techatassanasoontorn Assistant Professor of Information Sciences and Technology Fred Fonseca Chair of the Department Associate Professor of Information Sciences and Technology *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School ABSTRACT Contemporary IS research in offshoring/outsourcing has shown contradictory outcomes in reporting outsourcing success, especially in IT work. While many trusted practitioner sources confirm that outsourcing is gaining popularity, many efforts to pursue outsourcing are reported to be problematic or, even, a failure. Among such failures and successes, most of the thriving firms have undergone a second attempt by paying intensive attention to the knowledge transfer process, which is at the heart of the knowledge management problem. Knowledge is recognized by firms as a critical source of power that is derived from its scarcity in its environment. Hence, as a critical
    [Show full text]