DOCSLIB.ORG

Ephemeroptera

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ephemeroptera bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/841122; this version posted November 13, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 Extremely widespread parthenogenesis and a trade-off between 2 alternative forms of reproduction in mayflies (Ephemeroptera) 3 4 Maud Liegeois1,2, Michel Sartori2,1 and Tanja Schwander1 5 1Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, 6 Switzerland; emails: [email protected]; [email protected] 7 2Cantonal Museum of Zoology, Palais de Rumine, Place de la Riponne 6, CH-1014 8 Lausanne, Switzerland; email: [email protected] 9 10 11 Abstract 12 Studying alternative forms of reproduction in natural populations is of fundamental 13 importance for understanding the costs and benefits of sex. Mayflies are one of the few 14 animal groups where sexual reproduction co-occurs with different types of parthenogenesis, 15 providing ideal conditions for identifying benefits of sex in natural populations. Here, we 16 establish a catalogue of all known mayfly species capable of reproducing by parthenogenesis, 17 as well as mayfly species unable to do so. Overall, 1.8% of the described species reproduce 18 parthenogenetically, which is an order of magnitude higher than reported in other animal 19 groups. This frequency even reaches 47.8% if estimates are based on the number of studied 20 rather than described mayfly species. In terms of egg-hatching success, sex is a more 21 successful strategy than parthenogenesis, and we found a trade-off between the efficiency of 22 sexual and parthenogenetic reproduction across species. This means that improving the 23 capacity for parthenogenesis may come at the cost of being less able to reproduce sexually, 24 even in facultative parthenogens. Such a trade-off can help explain why facultative 25 parthenogenesis is extremely rare among animals despite its potential to combine the benefits 26 of sexual and parthenogenetic reproduction. We argue that parthenogenesis is frequently 27 selected in mayflies in spite of this probable trade-off because their typically low dispersal 28 ability and short and fragile adult life may frequently generate situations of mate limitation in 29 females. Mayflies are currently clearly underappreciated for understanding the benefits of sex 30 under natural conditions. 31 32 33 Key Words: mayflies, parthenogenesis, natural populations, evolution of sex. 34 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/841122; this version posted November 13, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 35 INTRODUCTION 36 The evolution and maintenance of sexual reproduction has been one of the major questions in 37 evolutionary ecology for the last decades (e.g., Agrawal, 2006; Otto, 2009; Jalvingh et al., 38 2016). Sex is associated with profound costs (reviewed in Lehtonen et al., 2012), yet it is the 39 most widespread reproductive mode among animals. Female-producing parthenogenesis 40 (thelytoky) would largely avoid the costs associated with sex, yet only a minority of animals 41 are known to reproduce parthenogenetically. Whether this minority is small or rather just slim 42 remains however unknown as there are only two quantitative estimates (based on species 43 lists) of the frequency of parthenogenesis (i.e., in vertebrates: White, 1973; Vrijenhoek, 1998; 44 and in haplodiploids: van der Kooi et al., 2017). This is unfortunate as such species lists are 45 invaluable for addressing when and how parthenogenetic reproduction is favoured over sex in 46 natural populations (e.g., Ross et al., 2013; van der Kooi et al., 2017) and thus for helping to 47 solve the paradox of sex. In this review, we provide such a quantitative estimate by 48 summarising the current knowledge on sexual and parthenogenetic reproduction in 49 Ephemeroptera (mayflies), as a first step towards developing this group for the study of 50 benefits of sex in natural populations. 51 Mayflies constitute one of the most basal (early diverging) lineage of insects 52 (Edmunds and McCafferty, 1988), their origin dating back to ~300 Mya (Brittain and Sartori, 53 2009). Widespread around the world with 3’666 described species (42 families, 472 genera; 54 adapted from Sartori and Brittain, 2015; MS pers. com.), they are well studied for being an 55 important link in the food chain, for their use for fly fishing (Knopp and Cormier, 1997), and 56 for their potential as bioindicators of water quality (Bauernfeind and Moog, 2000). Mayflies 57 do not feed as adults, relying solely on the reserves accumulated during their aquatic larval 58 stages. Adult life span is extremely short, lasting from few hours to some days depending on 59 the species. Because of their typically low dispersal ability and their short and fragile adult 60 life, mayflies have restricted opportunities for reproduction, which we argue is one of the 61 factors that may have selected for the evolution of parthenogenesis in this group. 62 Parthenogenesis in mayflies can be largely accidental (i.e., tychoparthenogenesis), facultative 63 or ‘obligate’ (see Box 1). Furthermore, a single species can feature mixed reproduction (some 64 females reproduce sexually, others parthenogenetially), either sympatrically or in allopatry 65 (i.e., geographical parthenogenesis). 66 We conducted a detailed literature review to establish a catalogue of all (to the best of 67 our knowledge) mayfly species capable of reproducing parthenogenetically, and study 68 whether the frequency of parthenogenesis varies among mayfly clades. We then use this 69 catalogue to conduct cross-species comparisons with respect to the cellular mechanisms of 70 parthenogenesis, how the capacity for parthenogenesis affects population sex ratios, as well as 71 the geographical distribution of sexual and parthenogenetic populations. 2 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/841122; this version posted November 13, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 72 73 74 Box 1. Three forms of female-producing (thelytokous) parthenogenesis in mayflies. A) 75 Tychoparthenogenesis or “spontaneous parthenogenesis”, occurs in sexual species (typically less than 10% 76 of unFertilised eggs develop through parthenogenesis). Given the low hatching success oF unfertilised eggs, 77 population sex ratios remain equal. B) Facultative parthenogenesis, when an egg may either be Fertilised or 78 develop parthenogenetically. The hatching success of unfertilised eggs in this case is intermediate (typically 79 10-75%), leading to Female-biased population sex ratios. C) Under ‘obligate’ parthenogenesis, eggs always 80 develop parthenogenetically and likely cannot be fertilised, with a hatching success typically higher than 81 75%. Only Females are present in these populations. Note that an individual species can Feature multiple 82 forms of parthenogenesis, in the same or different populations. 83 84 MATERIAL AND METHODS 85 Data collection 86 The species list was compiled by collecting information from the literature on different 87 websites: Google Scholar1, Web of Science2, Ephemeroptera Galactica3 and Ephemeroptera 88 of the world4. Starting with four previous reviews (Degrange, 1960; Humpesch, 1980; 89 Sweeney and Vannote, 1987; Funk et al., 2010) that allowed us to compile a first list of 78 90 mayflies species studied for their reproductive mode, our survey combined with personal 1 https://scholar.google.com 2 https://apps.webofknowledge.com 3 www.ephemeroptera-galactica.com 4 www.insecta.bio.spbu.ru/z/Eph-spp/Contents.htm 3 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/841122; this version posted November 13, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 91 communications and observations generated a list of 136 species, as described in our database 92 (Table 1, Appendix). When available for a given species, information on its geographical 93 distribution, cytological mechanism of parthenogenesis and sex determination was included 94 in the database (Appendix). 95 96 Classification of parthenogenesis 97 To classify mayfly species by forms of parthenogenesis (Box 1), we focused on the hatching 98 rate of unfertilised eggs. We defined two main categories according to this rate: “sexual 99 species” (including species with tychoparthenogenesis), when less than 10% of unfertilised 100 eggs hatch (typically 0-5.3% for population means), and “parthenogenetic species”, when 101 hatching success of unfertilised eggs is higher than 10% (typically 18.5-97.3% for population 102 means). Parthenogenetic species include all species with facultative parthenogenesis, 103 ‘obligate’ parthenogenesis and mixed reproduction. Note that species with mixed 104 reproduction have low population-average hatching success of unfertilised eggs when sexual 105 and parthenogenetic females occur
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 1 Table 1. Current Taxonomic Keys and the Level of Taxonomy Routinely U
    Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 Table 1. Current taxonomic keys and the level of taxonomy routinely used by the Ohio EPA in streams and rivers for various macroinvertebrate taxonomic classifications. Genera that are reasonably considered to be monotypic in Ohio are also listed. Taxon Subtaxon Taxonomic Level Taxonomic Key(ies) Species Pennak 1989, Thorp & Rogers 2016 Porifera If no gemmules are present identify to family (Spongillidae). Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Cnidaria monotypic genera: Cordylophora caspia and Craspedacusta sowerbii Platyhelminthes Class (Turbellaria) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Nemertea Phylum (Nemertea) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Phylum (Nematomorpha) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Nematomorpha Paragordius varius monotypic genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Ectoprocta monotypic genera: Cristatella mucedo, Hyalinella punctata, Lophopodella carteri, Paludicella articulata, Pectinatella magnifica, Pottsiella erecta Entoprocta Urnatella gracilis monotypic genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Polychaeta Class (Polychaeta) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Annelida Oligochaeta Subclass (Oligochaeta) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Hirudinida Species Klemm 1982, Klemm et al. 2015 Anostraca Species Thorp & Rogers 2016 Species (Lynceus Laevicaudata Thorp & Rogers 2016 brachyurus) Spinicaudata Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Williams 1972, Thorp & Rogers Isopoda Genus 2016 Holsinger 1972, Thorp & Rogers Amphipoda Genus 2016 Gammaridae: Gammarus Species Holsinger 1972 Crustacea monotypic genera: Apocorophium lacustre, Echinogammarus ischnus, Synurella dentata Species (Taphromysis Mysida Thorp & Rogers 2016 louisianae) Crocker & Barr 1968; Jezerinac 1993, 1995; Jezerinac & Thoma 1984; Taylor 2000; Thoma et al. Cambaridae Species 2005; Thoma & Stocker 2009; Crandall & De Grave 2017; Glon et al. 2018 Species (Palaemon Pennak 1989, Palaemonidae kadiakensis) Thorp & Rogers 2016 1 Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 Taxon Subtaxon Taxonomic Level Taxonomic Key(ies) Informal grouping of the Arachnida Hydrachnidia Smith 2001 water mites Genus Morse et al.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 4: EPHEMEROPTERA (Mayflies)
    Guide to Aquatic Invertebrate Families of Mongolia | 2009 CHAPTER 4 EPHEMEROPTERA (Mayflies) EPHEMEROPTERA Draft June 17, 2009 Chapter 4 | EPHEMEROPTERA 45 Guide to Aquatic Invertebrate Families of Mongolia | 2009 ORDER EPHEMEROPTERA Mayflies 4 Mayfly larvae are found in a variety of locations including lakes, wetlands, streams, and rivers, but they are most common and diverse in lotic habitats. They are common and abundant in stream riffles and pools, at lake margins and in some cases lake bottoms. All mayfly larvae are aquatic with terrestrial adults. In most mayfly species the adult only lives for 1-2 days. Consequently, the majority of a mayfly’s life is spent in the water as a larva. The adult lifespan is so short there is no need for the insect to feed and therefore the adult does not possess functional mouthparts. Mayflies are often an indicator of good water quality because most mayflies are relatively intolerant of pollution. Mayflies are also an important food source for fish. Ephemeroptera Morphology Most mayflies have three caudal filaments (tails) (Figure 4.1) although in some taxa the terminal filament (middle tail) is greatly reduced and there appear to be only two caudal filaments (only one genus actually lacks the terminal filament). Mayflies have gills on the dorsal surface of the abdomen (Figure 4.1), but the number and shape of these gills vary widely between taxa. All mayflies possess only one tarsal claw at the end of each leg (Figure 4.1). Characters such as gill shape, gill position, and tarsal claw shape are used to separate different mayfly families.
    [Show full text]
  • Invertebrate Prey Selectivity of Channel Catfish (Ictalurus Punctatus) in Western South Dakota Prairie Streams Erin D
    South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2017 Invertebrate Prey Selectivity of Channel Catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) in Western South Dakota Prairie Streams Erin D. Peterson South Dakota State University Follow this and additional works at: https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Peterson, Erin D., "Invertebrate Prey Selectivity of Channel Catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) in Western South Dakota Prairie Streams" (2017). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1677. https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd/1677 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INVERTEBRATE PREY SELECTIVITY OF CHANNEL CATFISH (ICTALURUS PUNCTATUS) IN WESTERN SOUTH DAKOTA PRAIRIE STREAMS BY ERIN D. PETERSON A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the degree for the Master of Science Major in Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences South Dakota State University 2017 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS South Dakota Game, Fish & Parks provided funding for this project. Oak Lake Field Station and the Department of Natural Resource Management at South Dakota State University provided lab space. My sincerest thanks to my advisor, Dr. Nels H. Troelstrup, Jr., for all of the guidance and support he has provided over the past three years and for taking a chance on me.
    [Show full text]
  • TB142: Mayflies of Maine: an Annotated Faunal List
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Technical Bulletins Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station 4-1-1991 TB142: Mayflies of aine:M An Annotated Faunal List Steven K. Burian K. Elizabeth Gibbs Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/aes_techbulletin Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Burian, S.K., and K.E. Gibbs. 1991. Mayflies of Maine: An annotated faunal list. Maine Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 142. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Technical Bulletins by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ISSN 0734-9556 Mayflies of Maine: An Annotated Faunal List Steven K. Burian and K. Elizabeth Gibbs Technical Bulletin 142 April 1991 MAINE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION Mayflies of Maine: An Annotated Faunal List Steven K. Burian Assistant Professor Department of Biology, Southern Connecticut State University New Haven, CT 06515 and K. Elizabeth Gibbs Associate Professor Department of Entomology University of Maine Orono, Maine 04469 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Financial support for this project was provided by the State of Maine Departments of Environmental Protection, and Inland Fisheries and Wildlife; a University of Maine New England, Atlantic Provinces, and Quebec Fellow­ ship to S. K. Burian; and the Maine Agricultural Experiment Station. Dr. William L. Peters and Jan Peters, Florida A & M University, pro­ vided support and advice throughout the project and we especially appreci­ ated the opportunity for S.K. Burian to work in their laboratory and stay in their home in Tallahassee, Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Partitioning by Two Species of Stream Mayflies (Ephemeroptera: Heptageniidae)
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 14 Number 3 - Fall 1981 Number 3 - Fall 1981 Article 5 October 1981 Resource Partitioning by Two Species of Stream Mayflies (Ephemeroptera: Heptageniidae) William O. Lamp Illinois Natural History Survey N. Wilson Britt Ohio State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Lamp, William O. and Britt, N. Wilson 1981. "Resource Partitioning by Two Species of Stream Mayflies (Ephemeroptera: Heptageniidae)," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 14 (3) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol14/iss3/5 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Lamp and Britt: Resource Partitioning by Two Species of Stream Mayflies (Ephemero 1981 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 151 RESOURCE PARTITIONING BY TWO SPECIES QF STREAM MAYFLIES (EPHEMEROPTERA: HEPTAGENIIDAE) William O. Lampl and N. Wilson Britt2 ABSTRACT We compared the phenology of nymph development, food type, and habitat selection of two stream mayflies, Stenacron interpunctatum (Say) and Stenonema pulchellum (Walsh) in Big Darby Creek, Ohio. Both species, which grow principally from autumn through early spring, emerged from the stream throughout the summer. The nymphs consumed the same sizes and types of food particles from deposits on stones, mostly in the form of detritus. As a result of morphological and behavioral adaptations, S. pulchellum lived on stones in swift water whereas S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Aquatic Invertebrate Assemblages Collected from the Green River in Dinosaur National Monument in 1962 and 2001
    A Comparison of Aquatic Invertebrate Assemblages Collected from the Green River in Dinosaur National Monument in 1962 and 2001 Final Report for United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Dinosaur National Monument 4545 East Highway 40 Dinosaur, Colorado 81610-9724 Report Prepared by: Dr. Mark Vinson, Ph.D. & Ms. Erin Thompson National Aquatic Monitoring Center Department o f Fisheries and Wildlife Utah State University Logan, Utah 84322-5210 www.usu.edu/buglab 22 January 2002 i Foreword The work described in this report was conducted by personnel of the National Aquatic Monitoring Center, Utah State University, Logan, Utah. Mr. J. Matt Tagg aided in the identification of the aquatic invertebrates. Ms. Leslie Ogden provided computer assistance. Several people at Dinosaur National Monument helped us immensely with various project details. Steve Petersburg, Dana Dilsaver, and Dennis Ditmanson provided us with our research permit. Ann Elder helped with sample archiving. Christy Wright scheduled our trip and provided us with our river permit. We thank them all for all their help and good spirit. We also thank Mr. Walter Kittams (National Park Service, Regional Office, Omaha Nebraska) and Mr. Earl M. Semingsen (Superintendent, Dinosaur National Monument) for funding the study and the members of the 1962 University of Utah expedition: Dr. Angus M. Woodbury, Dr. Stephen Durrant, Mr. Delbert Argyle, Mr. Douglas Anderson, and Dr. Seville Flowers for their foresight to conduct the original study nearly 40 years ago. The concept and value of long-term ecological data is often bantered about, but its value is never more apparent then when we conduct studies like that presented here.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Outlook
    Joey Steil From: Leslie Jordan <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 1:13 PM To: Angela Ruberto Subject: Potential Environmental Beneficial Users of Surface Water in Your GSA Attachments: Paso Basin - County of San Luis Obispo Groundwater Sustainabilit_detail.xls; Field_Descriptions.xlsx; Freshwater_Species_Data_Sources.xls; FW_Paper_PLOSONE.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S1.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S2.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S3.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S4.pdf CALIFORNIA WATER | GROUNDWATER To: GSAs We write to provide a starting point for addressing environmental beneficial users of surface water, as required under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). SGMA seeks to achieve sustainability, which is defined as the absence of several undesirable results, including “depletions of interconnected surface water that have significant and unreasonable adverse impacts on beneficial users of surface water” (Water Code §10721). The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a science-based, nonprofit organization with a mission to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends. Like humans, plants and animals often rely on groundwater for survival, which is why TNC helped develop, and is now helping to implement, SGMA. Earlier this year, we launched the Groundwater Resource Hub, which is an online resource intended to help make it easier and cheaper to address environmental requirements under SGMA. As a first step in addressing when depletions might have an adverse impact, The Nature Conservancy recommends identifying the beneficial users of surface water, which include environmental users. This is a critical step, as it is impossible to define “significant and unreasonable adverse impacts” without knowing what is being impacted. To make this easy, we are providing this letter and the accompanying documents as the best available science on the freshwater species within the boundary of your groundwater sustainability agency (GSA).
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Mayfly Species in North America List Compiled from Randolph, Robert Patrick
    Page 1 of 19 Distribution of mayfly species in North America List compiled from Randolph, Robert Patrick. 2002. Atlas and biogeographic review of the North American mayflies (Ephemeroptera). PhD Dissertation, Department of Entomology, Purdue University. 514 pages and information presented at Xerces Mayfly Festival, Moscow, Idaho June, 9-12 2005 Acanthametropodidae Ameletus ludens Needham Acanthametropus pecatonica (Burks) Canada—ON,NS,PQ. USA—IL,GA,SC,WI. USA—CT,IN,KY,ME,MO,NY,OH,PA,WV. Ameletus majusculus Zloty Analetris eximia Edmunds Canada—AB. Canada—AB ,SA. USA—MT,OR,WA. USA—UT,WY. Ameletus minimus Zloty & Harper USA—OR. Ameletidae Ameletus oregonenesis McDunnough Ameletus amador Mayo Canada—AB ,BC,SA. Canada—AB. USA—ID,MT,OR,UT. USA—CA,OR. Ameletus pritchardi Zloty Ameletus andersoni Mayo Canada—AB,BC. USA—OR,WA. Ameletus quadratus Zloty & Harper Ameletus bellulus Zloty USA—OR. Canada—AB. Ameletus shepherdi Traver USA—MT. Canada—BC. Ameletus browni McDunnough USA—CA,MT,OR. Canada—PQ Ameletus similior McDunnough USA—ME,PA,VT. Canada—AB,BC. Ameletus celer McDunnough USA—CO,ID,MT,OR,UT Canada—AB ,BC. Ameletus sparsatus McDunnough USA—CO,ID,MT,UT Canada—AB,BC,NWT. Ameletus cooki McDunnough USA—AZ,CO,ID,MT,NM,OR Canada—AB,BC. Ameletus subnotatus Eaton USA—CO,ID,MT,OR,WA. Canada—AB,BC,MB,NB,NF,ON,PQ. Ameletus cryptostimulus Carle USA—CO,UT,WY. USA—NC,NY,PA,SC,TN,VA,VT,WV. Ameletus suffusus McDunnough Ameletus dissitus Eaton Canada—AB,BC. USA—CA,OR. USA—ID,OR. Ameletus doddsianus Zloty Ameletus tarteri Burrows USA—AZ,CO,NM,NV,UT.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cladistic Insight Into the Higher Level Classification Of
    Systematic Entomology (2020), DOI: 10.1111/syen.12446 A cladistic insight into the higher level classification of Baetidae (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) PAULO VILELA CRUZ1,2 , CAROLINA NIETO3, JEAN-LUC GATTOLLIAT4, FREDERICO FALCÃO SALLES5 andNEUSA HAMADA2 1Universidade Federal de Rondônia - UNIR, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Ambientais - PPGCA, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ensino de Ciências da Natureza - PPGECN, Laboratório de Biodiversidade e Conservação - LABICON, CEP 76940-000, Rolim de Moura, Rondônia, Brazil, 2Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia - INPA, Coordenação de Pesquisas em Biodiversidade, Laboratório de Citotaxonomia e Insetos Aquáticos, CEP 69067-375, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil, 3Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical, CONICeT, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Ciudad Universitaria, 4107, Horco Molle, Tucumán, Argentina, 4Musée Cantonal de Zoologie, Palais de Rumine, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. Department of Ecology and Evolution, Biophore, University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland and 5Museu de Entomologia, Departamento de Entomologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Av. P. H. Rolfs, s/n, Campus Universitário, CEP 36570-900, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil Abstract. Baetidae was one of the first families established for mayflies (Ephemeroptera). After more than 200 years of progressive research, Baetidae is now known as the most species-rich family in the order. Two competing proposals of family division were proposed: Cloeoninae and Baetinae, or Protopatellata and Anteropatellata. Both classifications were established without cladistic support. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the phylogenetic relationships of the family Baeti- dae using morphological evidence and evaluate these classification schemes. The matrix included 245 morphological characters derived from larval and adult stages across 164 species in 98 genera.
    [Show full text]
  • Facultative Parthenogenesis in the Burrowing Mayfly, Ephoron Eophilum (Ephemeroptera: Polymitarcyidae) with an Extremely Short Alate Stage
    Eur. J. Entomol. 112(4): 606–612, 2015 doi: 10.14411/eje.2015.074 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) Facultative parthenogenesis in the burrowing mayfly, Ephoron eophilum (Ephemeroptera: Polymitarcyidae) with an extremely short alate stage KAZUKI SEKINÉ 1, 2, KOJI TOJO 3, 4 and YEON JAE BAE 1, 2, 5, * 1 BK21 Plus Eco-Leader Education Center, Korea University, Seoul 136-713, Korea; e-mail: [email protected] 2 Korean Entomological Institute, College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul 136-713, Korea 3 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Shinshu University, Asahi 3-1-1, Matsumoto, Nagano 390-8621, Japan; e-mail: [email protected] 4 Institute of Mountain Science, Shinshu University, Asahi 3-1-1, Matsumoto, Nagano 390-8621, Japan 5 Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul 136-713, Korea; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Ephemeroptera, Ephoron eophilum, facultative parthenogenesis, diploid thelytoky, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, exon-primed intron-crossing (EPIC) markers, short adult stage Abstract. Facultative parthenogenesis is important for mayflies with short alate stages because females are able to reproduce without mating. We studied facultative parthenogenesis in Ephoron eophilum, a mayfly with an extremely short alate stage. We examined the survival rates of embryos from unfertilized eggs, in addition to investigating the number of chromosomes in parthenogenetic offspring and the mode of inheritance by nuclear genetic analyses using Exon-Primed Intron-Crossing markers. The survival rate of thelytokous embryos was 0–70.2% (16.7 ± 26.7%, mean ± S.D.).
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Aquatic Surveys and Re-Assessment of Sites Within the Middle Powder River Watershed
    2013 Aquatic Surveys and Re-Assessment of Sites within the Middle Powder River Watershed Bureau of Land Management - Miles City Field Office and The Interagency BLM Aquatic Task Group Prepared by: David M. Stagliano Aquatic Ecologist April 2014 A program of the Montana State Library’s Natural Resource Information System that is operated by the University of Montana. Executive Summary This report integrates the project results of the 2011 study (Stagliano 2012) with 2012 fish surveys and 2013 intensive aquatic community sampling, and summarizes all years. Objectives in 2013 were to: 1) revisit six integrator sites established and sampled in 2005 and 2011 to assess aquatic community changes during this time period; 2) determine whether the macroinvertebrate communities have rebounded from low integrity levels reported in 2011 to 2012, as the fish community did; 3) perform targeted freshwater mussel surveys at these Powder River sites, five sites across the border into Wyoming and at six Tongue River coalbed natural gas (CBNG) monitoring sites; and 4) incorporate other agency data and interpret key community and watershed indicators (Observed vs. Expected (O/E) and Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI)) against reference condition standards to determine aquatic condition status and trends since the development of CBNG wells in the watershed. Additional fish surveys sites were added along the Powder River in Montana, as well as sites upstream into Wyoming for sturgeon chub and mussel occupancy surveys. Fish Communities: Fish surveys were performed in 2013 at each site using the same protocols during similar seasons and river flows as in 2012, 2011 and 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • The Success Story Of
    ZooKeys 1002: 1–114 (2020) A peer-reviewed open-access journal doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1002.58017 RESEARCH ARTICLE https://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research The success story of Labiobaetis Novikova & Kluge in the Philippines (Ephemeroptera, Baetidae), with description of 18 new species Thomas Kaltenbach1,2, Jhoana M. Garces3, Jean-Luc Gattolliat1,2 1 Museum of Zoology, Palais de Rumine, Place Riponne 6, CH-1005 Lausanne, Switzerland 2 University of Lausanne (UNIL), Department of Ecology and Evolution, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland 3 Depart- ment of Biology, School of Science and Engineering, Ateneo de Manila University, Quezon City, 1108 Metro Manila, Philippines Corresponding author: Thomas Kaltenbach ([email protected]) Academic editor: L. Pereira-da-Conceicoa | Received 26 August 2020 | Accepted 16 October 2020 | Published 10 December 2020 http://zoobank.org/C9EAF9DC-D87D-402F-AC35-CC4983D2E142 Citation: Kaltenbach T, Garces JM, Gattolliat J-L (2020) The success story of Labiobaetis Novikova & Kluge in the Philippines (Ephemeroptera, Baetidae), with description of 18 new species. ZooKeys 1002: 1–114. https://doi. org/10.3897/zookeys.1002.58017 Abstract Material collected between 1994 and 2020 in the Philippines, covering most main islands like Luzon, Mindoro, Palawan, Negros, Cebu, Leyte, and Mindanao and some smaller islands, substantially increased our knowledge of Labiobaetis Novikova & Kluge in this archipelago. Only three species were previously reported: L. molawinensis (Müller-Liebenau, 1982) and L. sumigarensis (Müller-Liebenau, 1982) from larvae and L. boettgeri (Ulmer, 1924) from adults. Eighteen new species have been identified using a combination of morphology and genetic distance (COI, Kimura 2-parameter). They are described and illustrated based on their larvae and a key to all species in the Philippines is provided.
    [Show full text]