DOCSLIB.ORG

R-Supply Lwestigations in Alaska, 1906-1907

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
R-Supply Lwestigations in Alaska, 1906-1907 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DlRECTOB WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 218 R-SUPPLY LWESTIGATIONS IN ALASKA, 1906-1907 OME AND KOUGAROK REGIONS, SEWARD PENINSULA; FAIRBANKS DISTRICT, YUKON-TANANA REGION BY ^RED-F. HENSHAW AND C. C. COVERT | WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1908 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 218 WATER-SUPPLY INVESTIGATIONS IN ALASKA, 1906-1907 NOME AND KOUGAROK REGIONS, SEWARD PENINSULA; FAIRBANKS DISTRICT, YUKON-TANANA REGION BY FRED F. HENSHAW AND C. C. COVERT Water Resources Branch, Survey, Beat 3106, Capitol Statior City, Okfe. WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1908 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction.............................................................. 7 Scope of work. ......................................................... 7 Cooperation............................................................ 8 Explanation of data and methods....................................... 9 The Nome region, by Fred F. Henshaw...................................... 13 Description of area..................................................... 13 Conditions affecting water supply....................................... 15 Gaging stations........................................................ 18 Nome River drainage basin............................................. 18 General description............'..................................... 18 Nome River above Miocene intake................................. 19 Nome River at Pioneer intake and Pioneer ditch.................... 21 Buffalo Creek,..................................................... 22 David Creek....................................................... 22 Dorothy Creek.................................................... 23 Hobson Creek...................................................... 23 The Miocene ditch system.......................................... 24 General description............................................. 24 Jett Creek ditch............................................... 30 Grand Central ditch............................................ 31 David Creek ditch............................................. 32 Seepage measurements on Miocene ditch......................... 33 Miscellaneous measurements.................................... 35 Campion ditch at Black Point...................................... 35 Seward ditch...................................................... 36 Pioneer ditch..................................................... 37 Grand Central River drainage basin..................................... 38 General description................................................. 38 North Fork of Grand Central River.................................. 38 West Fork of Grand Central River.................................. 41 Crater Lake outlet...............................................^. 44 Grand Central River below the forks................................ 46 Grand Central River below Nugget Creek........................... 47 Gold Run.......................................................... 48 Thompson Creek.................................................. 49 Nugget and Copper creeks......................................... 49 Jett Creek.........................:............................... 50 Morning Call Creek................................................. 51 Storage possibilities................................................ 52 Salmon Lake........................................................... 53 Kruzgamepa River drainage basin below Salmon Lake................... 54 General description................................................. 54 Kruzgamepa River at outlet of Salmon Lake......................... 55 Crater Creek...................................................... 57 Iron Creek......................................................... 57 Miscellaneous measurements........................................ 59 Imuruk Basin drainage................................................ 59 3 4 CONTENTS. The Nome region Continued. Page. Sinuk River drainage basin............................................ 60 General description................................................. 60 Upper Sinuk River................................................ 60 Windy Creek...................................................... 61 North Star Creek.................................................. 62 Stewart River..................................................... 63 Slate Creek....................................................... 63 Other Sinuk River drainage........................................ 64 Cripple River drainage basin............................................ 64 General description................................................ 64 Cedric ditch....................................................... 64 General description............................................ 64 Cedric ditch above penstock................................... 65 Penny River drainage basin............................................ 66 General description................................................ 66 Penny River at Sutton intake and Sutton ditch...................... 66 Snake River drainage basin............................................ 68 General description................................................. 68 Snake River above Glacier Creek................................... 68 Flambeau and Eldorado River drainage basins.......................... 69 Solomon River drainage basin........................................... 69 Flow of ditches in Nome region........................................ 70 Available water supply during 1906 and 1907............................ 70 Ditch and pipe lines.................................................... 72 Water-power possibilities.............................................. 76 The Kougarok region, by Fred F. Henshaw................................. 77 Introduction.......................................................... 77 Description of area..................................................... 77 Conditions affecting water supply....................................... 78 Gaging stations........................................................ 79 Kougarok River drainage basin......................................... 79 Description of basin............................................... 79 Kougarok River below Washington Creek........................... 80 Kougarok River at Homestake intake and Homestake ditch.......... 80 Kougarok River above Taylor Creek................................ 82 Kougarok River above Coarse Gold Creek........................... 82 Irving ditch...................................................... 83 Homestake ditch.................................................. 83 Taylor Creek at North Star intake.................................. 84 Taylor Creek at Cascade intake..................................... 85 Taylor Creek at mouth............................................. 86 North Star ditch above siphon..................................... 86 Cascade ditch..................................................... 87 Henry Creek....................................................... 88 Coarse Gold Creek................................................. 88 North Fork........................................................ 89 Miscellaneous measurements........................................ 90 Total water supply in 1907......................................... 90 Noxapaga River drainage basin.......................................... 91 Serpentine River drainage basin......................................... 92 Schlitz and Reindeer creeks........................................ 92 Bryan and Dick creeks............................................. 92 Quartz and Bismarck creeks ....................................... 93 American River drainage basin......................................... 93 CONTENTS. 5 The Kougarok region Continued. Page. Hydraulic developments................................................. 94 Relative run-off of different areas......................................... 95 The Fairhaven precinct, by Fred F. Henshaw.............................. 99 Introduction.......................................................... 99 Fairhaven ditch....................................................... 99 Candle ditch........................................................... 100 Bear Creek ditch...................................................... 100 The Fairbanks district, by C. C. Covert..................................... 101 Description of area..................................................... 101 Conditions affecting water supply....................................... 103 Gaging stations........................................................ 106 Little Chena River drainage basin...................................... 106 General description................................................. 106 Chena Slough at Fairbanks.......................................... 108 Little Chena River above mouth of Elliott Creek.................... 109 Elliott Creek above mouth of Sorrels Creek .......................... 110 Sorrels Creek....................................................... 110 Fish Creek above mouth of Fairbanks Creek.......................... Ill Bear Creek........................................................ 112 Fairbanks Creek................................................... 112 Miller Creek....................................................... 113
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nome River Water Control Structures
    BLM LIBRARY 88049206 Department of the Interior BLM-Alaska Open File Report 62 Bureau of Land Management BLM/AK/ST-97/003+81 00+020 April 1997 Alaska State Office 222 West 7th, #13 Anchorage, Alaska 99513 Nome River Water Control Structures Howard L. Smith JK 870 .L3 06 no. 62 ^&&£ *>v^ fe Nome River Water Control Structures Howard L. Smith U.S. Department of the Interior of Bureau Land Management 0pen Fi)e Report 62 Alaska State Office -| ^pr il 997 Anchorage, Alaska 99513 Author Howard Smith is an archaeologist with the Northwest Management Team, Northern District, Bureau of Land Management, Fairbanks, Alaska. Open File Reports Open File Reports identify the results of inventories or other investigations that are made available to the public outside the formal BLM-Alaska technical publication series. These reports can include preliminary or incomplete data and are not published and distributed in quantity. The reports are available at BLM offices in Alaska, the USDI Resources Library in Anchorage, various libraries of the University of Alaska, and other selected locations. Copies are also available for inspection at the USDI Natural Resources Library in Washington, D.C. and at the BLM Service Center Library in Denver. Cover Photo: Headgate of the Miocene Ditch on the Nome River, Alaska. Photo by Howard L Smith Table of Contents Abstract 1 Background 1 Discovery of Gold 1 Events in 1899 2 Events in 1900 4 Events after 1900 5 Water Control Structures 6 The Miocene Ditch 7 The Seward Ditch 17 The Pioneer Ditch 18 The Campion Ditch 19 The
    [Show full text]
  • Tentative Lists Submitted by States Parties As of 15 April 2021, in Conformity with the Operational Guidelines
    World Heritage 44 COM WHC/21/44.COM/8A Paris, 4 June 2021 Original: English UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Extended forty-fourth session Fuzhou (China) / Online meeting 16 – 31 July 2021 Item 8 of the Provisional Agenda: Establishment of the World Heritage List and of the List of World Heritage in Danger 8A. Tentative Lists submitted by States Parties as of 15 April 2021, in conformity with the Operational Guidelines SUMMARY This document presents the Tentative Lists of all States Parties submitted in conformity with the Operational Guidelines as of 15 April 2021. • Annex 1 presents a full list of States Parties indicating the date of the most recent Tentative List submission. • Annex 2 presents new Tentative Lists (or additions to Tentative Lists) submitted by States Parties since 16 April 2019. • Annex 3 presents a list of all sites included in the Tentative Lists of the States Parties to the Convention, in alphabetical order. Draft Decision: 44 COM 8A, see point II I. EXAMINATION OF TENTATIVE LISTS 1. The World Heritage Convention provides that each State Party to the Convention shall submit to the World Heritage Committee an inventory of the cultural and natural sites situated within its territory, which it considers suitable for inscription on the World Heritage List, and which it intends to nominate during the following five to ten years. Over the years, the Committee has repeatedly confirmed the importance of these Lists, also known as Tentative Lists, for planning purposes, comparative analyses of nominations and for facilitating the undertaking of global and thematic studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Pamphlet to Accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3131
    Bedrock Geologic Map of the Seward Peninsula, Alaska, and Accompanying Conodont Data By Alison B. Till, Julie A. Dumoulin, Melanie B. Werdon, and Heather A. Bleick Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3131 View of Salmon Lake and the eastern Kigluaik Mountains, central Seward Peninsula 2011 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................1 Sources of data ....................................................................................................................................1 Components of the map and accompanying materials .................................................................1 Geologic Summary ........................................................................................................................................1 Major geologic components ..............................................................................................................1 York terrane ..................................................................................................................................2 Grantley Harbor Fault Zone and contact between the York terrane and the Nome Complex ..........................................................................................................................3 Nome Complex ............................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • IN-SITU RADIOMETRIC AGE DETERMINATION: a CRITICAL COMPONENT of MARS EXPLORATION. J. B. Plescia1 and T. D. Swindle2, 1Applied
    Seventh International Conference on Mars 3278.pdf IN-SITU RADIOMETRIC AGE DETERMINATION: A CRITICAL COMPONENT OF MARS EXPLORATION. J. B. Plescia1 and T. D. Swindle2, 1Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, Laurel, MD 20723, [email protected]. 2Department of Planetary Sciences, Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, [email protected]. Introduction: In order to understand the geologic, Bombardment [12-18], although this remains a contro- climatic and possibly the biologic evolution of Mars, versial topic. It has also been suggested that the crater- the absolute timing of events must be established. ing rate over the last several billion years has not been Questions of climate change, glacial processes, avail- uniform, but rather has been punctuated by periodic ability of surface water, recent volcanism, and atmos- spikes in the rate [19-20]. pheric evolution all hinge on determining when those events occurred in absolute time. Resolving the abso- lute timing of events has become even more critical with the suggestions of currently active glacial and perhaps fluvial activity and very young volcanic activ- ity. Background: To date, only the relative chronology of events has been firmly established [1]. This has been accomplished through the use of impact crater counts in which the frequency of impact craters per unit area greater than or equal to some diameter is used as a reference for comparison among surfaces; the higher the frequency, the older the age [2-3]. This technique allows surfaces and events on different parts of a planet to be correlated in time.
    [Show full text]
  • Nome River Fishery II
    NOMERIVER FISHERY IT James S. Magdanz Charts and Graphs by Dora E. Punguk Technical Paper Number 5 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Subsistence Nome, Alaska December 1981 ABSTRACT This report is a continuation of the Division of Subsistence's effort to document the Nome River Fishery for the Board of Fisheries. It describes the fishery and its users in greater detail than did earlier papers, using computer analysis of a permitee survey administered in 1980 and random sample interviews conducted in 1981. It evaluates the fishery in the context of recent Board of Fisheries decisions on subsistence. The survey data show two distinct groups of fishers: short-term residents with five or fewer years in Northwest Alaska and long-term residents with six or more years. The short-term residents constitute 32 percent of the fishery users; the long-term residents constitute 68 percent. Long-term residents show much greater dependence on the fishery, use traditional methods of processing, pass on skills and activities from generation to generation, and participate in a wide range of other subsistence activities. Short-term residents do not display these characteristics to the degree long-term resi- dents do, except for sharing, which is a common trait of both groups. To a certain extent, these two groups reflect subcommunities extant in the city of Nome. i , TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ............................. 1 History and Description of the Area. ................. 5 Methodology. ............................. 8 Findings...............................1 1 Long-term, stable, reliable pattern of use and dependency ... .14 Traditional modes of handling preparation and storage ..... .21 Intergenerational transmission of skills and activities ...
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Range
    Alaska Range Introduction The heavily glacierized Alaska Range consists of a number of adjacent and discrete mountain ranges that extend in an arc more than 750 km long (figs. 1, 381). From east to west, named ranges include the Nutzotin, Mentas- ta, Amphitheater, Clearwater, Tokosha, Kichatna, Teocalli, Tordrillo, Terra Cotta, and Revelation Mountains. This arcuate mountain massif spans the area from the White River, just east of the Canadian Border, to Merrill Pass on the western side of Cook Inlet southwest of Anchorage. Many of the indi- Figure 381.—Index map of vidual ranges support glaciers. The total glacier area of the Alaska Range is the Alaska Range showing 2 approximately 13,900 km (Post and Meier, 1980, p. 45). Its several thousand the glacierized areas. Index glaciers range in size from tiny unnamed cirque glaciers with areas of less map modified from Field than 1 km2 to very large valley glaciers with lengths up to 76 km (Denton (1975a). Figure 382.—Enlargement of NOAA Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) image mosaic of the Alaska Range in summer 1995. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration image mosaic from Mike Fleming, Alaska Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Anchorage, Alaska. The numbers 1–5 indicate the seg- ments of the Alaska Range discussed in the text. K406 SATELLITE IMAGE ATLAS OF GLACIERS OF THE WORLD and Field, 1975a, p. 575) and areas of greater than 500 km2. Alaska Range glaciers extend in elevation from above 6,000 m, near the summit of Mount McKinley, to slightly more than 100 m above sea level at Capps and Triumvi- rate Glaciers in the southwestern part of the range.
    [Show full text]
  • Orbital Evidence for More Widespread Carbonate- 10.1002/2015JE004972 Bearing Rocks on Mars Key Point: James J
    PUBLICATIONS Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets RESEARCH ARTICLE Orbital evidence for more widespread carbonate- 10.1002/2015JE004972 bearing rocks on Mars Key Point: James J. Wray1, Scott L. Murchie2, Janice L. Bishop3, Bethany L. Ehlmann4, Ralph E. Milliken5, • Carbonates coexist with phyllosili- 1 2 6 cates in exhumed Noachian rocks in Mary Beth Wilhelm , Kimberly D. Seelos , and Matthew Chojnacki several regions of Mars 1School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2The Johns Hopkins University/Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, Maryland, USA, 3SETI Institute, Mountain View, California, USA, 4Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA, 5Department of Geological Sciences, Brown Correspondence to: University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA, 6Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA J. J. Wray, [email protected] Abstract Carbonates are key minerals for understanding ancient Martian environments because they Citation: are indicators of potentially habitable, neutral-to-alkaline water and may be an important reservoir for Wray, J. J., S. L. Murchie, J. L. Bishop, paleoatmospheric CO2. Previous remote sensing studies have identified mostly Mg-rich carbonates, both in B. L. Ehlmann, R. E. Milliken, M. B. Wilhelm, Martian dust and in a Late Noachian rock unit circumferential to the Isidis basin. Here we report evidence for older K. D. Seelos, and M. Chojnacki (2016), Orbital evidence for more widespread Fe- and/or Ca-rich carbonates exposed from the subsurface by impact craters and troughs. These carbonates carbonate-bearing rocks on Mars, are found in and around the Huygens basin northwest of Hellas, in western Noachis Terra between the Argyre – J.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Memorandum Moonlight Wells Protection Area
    TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM MOONLIGHT WELLS PROTECTION AREA NOME, ALASKA BEESC Project No. 25071 June 2005 Prepared for: City of Nome Nome Joint Utility System P.O. Box 281 P.O. Box 70 Nome, Alaska 99762 Nome, Alaska 99762 2000 W. International Airport Road, #C‐1 Anchorage, Alaska 99502 Phone (907) 563‐0013 Fax (907) 563‐6713 Final Technical Memorandum Moonlight Wells Protection Area BEESC Project No. 25071 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS..................................................................................... i TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM.................................................................................................1 REFERENCE................................................................................................................................4 TABLE Table 1 Moonlight Wells Information ...................................................................................2 FIGURES Figure 1 Site Location Figure 2 Proposed Moonlight Wells Protection Area Figure 3 B-B’ Crosssection Figure 4 A-A’ Crosssection Figure 5 Moonlight Wells Protection Area and Land Status APPENDICES Appendix A Geology and Geophysics of the Moonlight Wells Area Appendix B Well Logs ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS BEESC Bristol Environmental & Engineering Services Corporation bgs below ground surface June 2005 i Revision 3 Final Technical Memorandum Moonlight Wells Protection Area BEESC Project No. 25071 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM The City of Nome obtains drinking water from a groundwater source located at Moonlight Springs. Moonlight Springs is located approximately 3 miles north of the Nome airport (see Figure 1). The City of Nome currently obtains water from three wells located in a fractured marble formation. The purpose of this technical memorandum is to define the protection area of the marble aquifer associated with the three drinking water wells and to identify potential activities that could impact the aquifer within the protection area. Prior to 2001, Nome obtained drinking water from a collection gallery located at Moonlight Springs.
    [Show full text]
  • Wulik-Kivalina Rivers Study
    Volume 19 Study G-I-P STATE OF ALASKA Jay S. Hammond, Governor Annual Performance Report for INVENTORY AND CATALOGING OF SPORT FISH AND SPORT FISH WATERS OF WESTERN ALASKA Kenneth T. AZt ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME RonaZd 0. Skoog, Commissioner SPORT FISH DIVISION Rupert E. Andrews, Director Section C Job No. G-I-H (continued) Page No. Obj ectives Techniques Used F Results Sport Fish Stocking Test Netting Upper Cook Inlet-Anchorage-West Side Susitna Chinook Salmon Escapement Eulachon Investigations Deshka River Coho Creel Census Eshamy-Western Prince William Sound Rearing Coho and Chinook Salmon Studies Rabideux Creek Montana Creek Discussion Literature Cited Section D Study No. G-I Inventory and Cataloging NO. G-I-N Inventory and Cataloging of Gary A. Pearse Interior Waters with Emphasis on the Upper Yukon and the Haul Road Areas Abstract Background Recommendations Objectives Techniques Used Findings Lake Surveys Survey Summaries of Remote Waters Literature Cited NO. G-I-P Inventory and Cataloging of Kenneth T. Alt Sport Fish and Sport Fish Waters of Western Alaska Abstract Recommendations Objectives Background Techniques Used Findings Fish Species Encountered Section D Job No. G- I-P (continued) Page No. Area Angler Utilization Study Life History Studies of Grayling and Arctic Char in Waters of the Area Arctic Char Grayling Noatak River Drainage Survey Lakes Streams Life History Data on Fishes Collected During 1977 Noatak Survey Lake Trout Northern Pike Least Cisco Arctic Char Grayling Round Whitefish Utilization of Fishes of the Noatak Valley Literature Cited NO. G- I-P Inventory and Cataloging of Kenneth T.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA's Meteoroid Engineering Model (MEM) 3 and Its Ability to Replicate Spacecraft Impact Rates
    NASA’s Meteoroid Engineering Model (MEM) 3 and its ability to replicate spacecraft impact rates Althea V. Moorhead NASA Meteoroid Environment Office, Marshall Space Flight Center EV44, Alabama, 35812 Aaron Kingery ERC, Jacobs Space Exploration Group, NASA Meteoroid Environment Office Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL 35812 USA Steven Ehlert Qualis Corporation, Jacobs Space Exploration Group, NASA Meteoroid Environment Office Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL 35812 USA Meteoroids pose one of the largest risks to spacecraft outside of low Earth orbit. In order to correctly predict the rate at which meteoroids impact and damage spacecraft, environment models must describe the mass, directionality, velocity, and density distributions of meteoroids. NASA’s Meteoroid Engineering Model (MEM) is one such model; MEM 3 is an updated version of the code that better captures the correlation between directionality and velocity and incorporates a bulk density distribution. This paper describes MEM 3 and compares its predictions with the rate of large particle impacts seen on the Long Duration Exposure Facility (LDEF) and the Pegasus II and III satellites. Nomenclature M = mass of the Sun M = mass of the Earth a = semimajor axis ⊕ BH = Brinell hardness Nc;i = number of craters on side i m b = unitless parameter that relates ∆, y, x, and tt = meteoroid mass c = speed of sound in meteoroid P = probability pc = crater depth c0;t = speed of sound in unstressed target material Q ct = speed of sound in target = aphelion distance d = meteoroid
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity in Sub-Saharan Africa and Its Islands Conservation, Management and Sustainable Use
    Biodiversity in Sub-Saharan Africa and its Islands Conservation, Management and Sustainable Use Occasional Papers of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 6 IUCN - The World Conservation Union IUCN Species Survival Commission Role of the SSC The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is IUCN's primary source of the 4. To provide advice, information, and expertise to the Secretariat of the scientific and technical information required for the maintenance of biologi- Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna cal diversity through the conservation of endangered and vulnerable species and Flora (CITES) and other international agreements affecting conser- of fauna and flora, whilst recommending and promoting measures for their vation of species or biological diversity. conservation, and for the management of other species of conservation con- cern. Its objective is to mobilize action to prevent the extinction of species, 5. To carry out specific tasks on behalf of the Union, including: sub-species and discrete populations of fauna and flora, thereby not only maintaining biological diversity but improving the status of endangered and • coordination of a programme of activities for the conservation of bio- vulnerable species. logical diversity within the framework of the IUCN Conservation Programme. Objectives of the SSC • promotion of the maintenance of biological diversity by monitoring 1. To participate in the further development, promotion and implementation the status of species and populations of conservation concern. of the World Conservation Strategy; to advise on the development of IUCN's Conservation Programme; to support the implementation of the • development and review of conservation action plans and priorities Programme' and to assist in the development, screening, and monitoring for species and their populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries Update for the Week of June 29-July 5, 2020
    FISHERIES UPDATE July 29 - July 5, 2020 Report 6 FISHERIES UPDATE FOR THE WEEK OF JUNE 29-JULY 5, 2020. Report #6 Compiled by George Pappas - (907) 786-3822, [email protected] Office of Subsistence Management, USFWS. The purpose of the weekly fisheries update is to provide the reader with an overall summary of the status of subsistence related fisheries throughout the state of Alaska. The target audience is the Federal Subsistence Board and its Staff Committee. The report was compiled with the assistance of the Federal in-season managers and OSM staff that provided weekly updated information by the close of business on Friday of the reporting week. My goal is to have the report sent by the close of business the following Monday. Web links have been included to provide additional information. You may obtain additional information on a fishery of particular interest by contacting the in-season manager, provided contacts, follow the provided web links, or contact me. SOUTHEAST ALASKA Sitka and Hoonah Area – Justin Koller, Forest Service, Tongass National Forest Justin Koller, (907)747-4297 [email protected] Herring – There was no commercial herring fishery in Sitka Sound in 2020. Please see this summary of Sitka Sound herring 2020. Also, summary of southeast Alaska herring 2020. Falls Lake - The Forest Service and the Organized Village of Kake operate the Falls Lake trap and video net weir which were installed June 25. No sockeye have been counted yet but the run usually does not commence until the second week in July. No harvest has been observed yet.
    [Show full text]