DOCSLIB.ORG

2020 Victorian Water Award Finalists Winners Announced on Thursday, 4 February 2021 at the Victorian Water Awards Luncheon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2020 Victorian Water Award Finalists Winners Announced on Thursday, 4 February 2021 at the Victorian Water Awards Luncheon 2020 Victorian Water Award Finalists Winners announced on Thursday, 4 February 2021 at the Victorian Water Awards Luncheon. R&D Excellence Award • Managing Risk from Post-Fire Erosion in Water Supply Catchments Melbourne Water, Alluvium Consulting and The University of Melbourne • Short-Cut Nitrogen Removal - An International Breakthrough Improving Effluent Quality and Energy Neutral Wastewater Treatment Melbourne Water, Jacobs, Barwon Water and John Holland-KBR Joint Venture • Smart System for Delivering Rainwater as Hot Water Fit for Showering, Bathing and Laundry Applications South East Water • The Use of Artificial Intelligence to Predict Failures on Water and Sewer Networks Veolia, Western Water and Coliban Water • Using Real-Time Information and Water Usage Feedback to Create New Habits South East Water and The University of Melbourne • Victorian Collaboration on Sewage Surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 (ColoSSoS VIC Node) WaterRA and ColoSSoS Project Partners Infrastructure Project Innovation Award (Regional) • Environmental Asset Data Collection and Use - Spatial Data Structures and Tools for Best- Practice Catchment Management in the Water Industry Central Highlands Water • South West Loddon Pipeline Project GWMWater, Coliban Water, Goulbourn Murray Water, Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning • Torres Strait Islands Sustainable Water and Wastewater Management Plan Arup, Griffith University and Ganden Engineers & Project Managers Infrastructure Project Innovation Award (Metro) • Australia's Environmentally Green Relining System – GeoKrete Aqua Metro Services and Melbourne Water • CBD Sewer Augmentation Stage 2A - Lonsdale Street Sewer Upgrade City West Water, SMEC and Robb Carr • Deriving Value Through Remote Access to Asset Information CH2M Beca • Grasmere Creek Revitalisation Project Melbourne Water, Alluvium Consulting and Greenworks Organisational Excellence Award (sponsored by Fulton Hogan) • Delivering Digital Education that Serves Our Community Melbourne Water • Hardship Prediction Model City West Water • King System Experiment – Empowerment versus Water Restrictions North East Water, Goulburn Murray Water and Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning • Pride in Water Yarra Valley Water • Taking Action - GMW's Transformation Goulburn Murray Water • Wara Paring Indigenous Civil Construction Project Aqua Metro Services and Melbourne Water Student Water Prize (sponsored by Eurofins) • An Integrated Method for Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Using a DRASTICL Model and a Green Algae Ecotoxicity Test Adrian Cervantes, The University of Melbourne • Developing a Robust Ceramic Pressure-Driven Membrane- Based System for the Efficient Removal of Pollutants from Mining Wastewaters Seyed Mohsen Samaei, Swinburne University of Technology • Development of a Novel, Biofouling Resistant Passive Sampling Device for Ammonia Monitoring in Marine Waters with Neural Network-Based Calibration Lenka O'Connor Sraj, The University of Melbourne • The Development of Novel Nanofunctional Wastewater Remediation Strategies: Creating Clean Water for the Many, Not the Few Piumie Rajapaksha, RMIT University • Understanding Solids Behaviour and Biological Dynamics in Anaerobic Lagoons for Improved Energy Production from Waste Peter Wardrop, The University of Queensland Young Water Professional of the Year (sponsored by Xylem) • Zoltan Kelly, Asset Information Improvement Specialist, Melbourne Water • Louise Loughnan, Senior Water and Wastewater Engineer, Jacobs • Joshua Quinn, Water Quality Scientist, South East Water • Simon Roberts, Senior Integrated Water Management Planner, City West Water • Celeste Ward, Process Engineer, Stantec Water Professional of the Year • Deb Brown, Director, Resilient Cities and Towns, Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning • Carl Walters, Sustainable Irrigation Program Manager, Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MELBOURNE WATER POSITION DESCRIPTION Team Leader, River Health (North East)
    MELBOURNE WATER POSITION DESCRIPTION Team Leader, River Health (North East) REPORTS TO: DIRECT REPORTS: REGIONAL MANAGER, WATERWAYS 2 Direct Reports (approx. 9 total staff) (NORTH EAST) leading the following functions: Upper Yarra River & Tributaries Lower Yarra River & Tributaries KEY RESPONSIBILITIES KPIS The Team Leader, River Health (North East) will provide leadership Team Safety of a geographic team that has an objective to improve the condition Management Plan of waterways and the water quality of receiving waters across the implemented Yarra River catchment including: Team members Taking care of own, colleagues and contractors Health and Performance and Safety through active participative and visible safety Development Plans in leadership place Leading a team that provides a strong service delivery and Waterways vision / customer focus for waterway and drainage asset strategies established management activities and implemented Leading, coaching and motivating a diverse team of Programs and value professionals driven by a strong sense of commitment to the communicated to community, environment and sustainability authorising Listening to customers and maintaining the confidence and environment and trust of the community and stakeholders in Melbourne Water stakeholders as caretaker of river health and provider of valued drainage services to the region Establishing and implementing a shared vision with internal and external stakeholders for the improvement of waterways and integrated water management outcomes across the
    [Show full text]
  • Maroondah Water Supply System (Upper and Central Sections) H2381
    HERITAGE COUNCIL DETERMINATION Determination Date 7 December 2017 Place/Object Name Maroondah Water Supply System (Upper and Central Sections) Location Healesville, Yarra Glen, Christmas Hills, Greensborough VHR Number H2381 Place Category Heritage Place At a meeting of the Heritage Council on 7 December 2017 it was determined to include the above place in the Victorian Heritage Register and make certain amendments to the registration material that had been proposed in the Executive Director’s Recommendation, namely amendments to the Statement of Cultural Heritage Significance and to the description of the Extent of Registration for the Place as compared with what had been proposed by the Executive Director. The Heritage Council endorses the attached registration information for the above place. Professor Stuart Macintyre AO Chair, Heritage Council of Victoria Page | 1 Recommendation of the Executive Director and assessment of cultural heritage significance under s.32 of the Heritage Act 1995 Place: Maroondah Water Supply System (Upper and Central Sections) Location: Healesville, Yarra Glen, Christmas Hills, Greensborough VHR Number: H2381 Category: Heritage Place Hermes Number: 197552 Heritage Overlays: Yarra Ranges Shire HO141: Former township of Fernshaw HO156: Badger Creek Weir and Park HO173: Grace Burn Weir and Aqueduct HO174: Maroondah Catchment, Reservoir & Park HO177: Donnelly's Creek Weir, Condon’s Gully HO178: Mt Juliet Cairn Nillumbik Shire HO2: Maroondah Aqueduct; Entire Length (within Nillumbik) at various sites from Skyline Road, Christmas Hills to Allendale Road, Diamond Creek HO56: Maroondah aqueduct pipe track 23 Whittlesea Shire HO89: Maroondah Aqueduct over Plenty River Bridge Other listings: National Trust: Black Spur, Maroondah Highway EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR RECOMMENDATION TO THE HERITAGE COUNCIL: Recommendation That the Maroondah Water Supply System (Upper and Central Sections) be included as a Heritage Place in the Victorian Heritage Register under the Heritage Act 1995 [Section 32 (1)(a)].
    [Show full text]
  • Dams in Victoria Safe and Versatile Infrastructure
    Dams in Victoria Safe and versatile infrastructure A dam is a wall that holds back water to form a basin, lake or reservoir. Dams are typically made of earth, rock or concrete. Dams can be privately owned, owned by business or a Government agency. They can be used to store water for drinking, industry or farming, to protect property from flooding, or for recreation. Dams in Victoria Victoria has about 450,000 dams – this number shows how important dams are to the economy and our way of life. The sizes of our dams range from major storages such as Dartmouth dam (about 4,000,000 ML), Lake Eildon (about 3,300,000 ML) and the Thomson dam (about 1,070,000 Farm dams ML) to small swimming pool-sized dams on farms or lifestyle properties. These smaller privately-owned dams are the most Generating power: these large dams hold water for cooling common type of dam in Victoria. Together, Victoria’s dams have coal or gas-fired power stations or to generate hydro-electric a total storage capacity of about 13,400,000 ML. power. How we use our dams Recreation: some of the lakes created by dams are used for recreational activities such as boating and fishing. These dams Dams have huge social, economic and environmental benefits. can be popular tourist destinations and the tourism generated The vast majority of dams in Victoria have been built to store by these dams can be important to the social and economic rainfall when it is plentiful for use in times when it is most wellbeing of regional communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Melbourne Water Corporate Plan 2020/21 to 2024/25 5.09 MB
    Melbourne Water Corporate Plan 2021-22 to 2025-26 SSN: 2652-2985 (Print) ISSN: 2652-2799 (Online) © Copyright April 2021 Melbourne Water Corporation. All rights reserved. No part of the document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, photocopied or otherwise dealt with without prior written permission of Melbourne Water Corporation. Disclaimer: This publication may be of assistance to you but Melbourne Water and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. All actions in this plan will be delivered subject to funding. Foreword Melburnians are proud of their city and their way of life, The community strongly values the natural environment which has been consistently recognised as one of the across the Greater Melbourne Region, and we will continue world’s most liveable. While the ongoing COVID-19 to support them in living healthy and active lifestyles pandemic continues to impact the way we all live our by increasing accessibility to open, green spaces. As lives, it has also highlighted the critical role of public managers of large sections of land and waterways, the health in ensuring our region can thrive. Public health is year ahead will see us striving to enhance community at the centre of our vision to enhance life and liveability, wellbeing by improving access to recreational facilities and and we are proud of the role we play through delivery of strengthening our people’s connection to nature.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Value of Water in Storage
    Melbourne School of Engineering Department of Infrastructure Engineering The economic value of water in storage 11th February 2018 Citation Western, Andrew W., Taylor, Nathan, Langford, John K., and Azmi, Mo, 2017. The economic value of water in storage. The University of Melbourne, Australia. Copyright © The University of Melbourne, 2017. To the extent permitted by law, all rights are reserved and no part of this publication covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means except with the written permission of The University of Melbourne. Contact Professor Andrew Western, Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, 3010, Australia [email protected] Project Team The University of Melbourne Project team consisted of: • Professor Andrew Western, Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne; • Professor John Langford, Steering Committee Chair, University of Melbourne; and • Research Fellow, Nathan Taylor, University of Melbourne. Steering Committee The project was informed by the members of the Steering Committee consisting of: • Richard Smith; Business Planning and Regulation Manager; City West Water; • Udaya Kularathna; Team Leader Water Resource Assessment, Integrated Planning; Melbourne Water; • Bruce Rhodes, Manager Water Resources Management, Melbourne Water; • Ian Johnson; Manager Urban Water Policy; South East Water; • Dominic Keary; ESC Project Manager; Yarra Valley Water; and • Stephen, Sonnenberg, Manager Urban Water Security Policy, Department of Environment, Land, Water & Planning. The Steering Committee was Chaired by Professor John Langford, University of Melbourne. While this report was informed by the Steering Committee, the findings contained in the report are the responsibility of the Project Team and not the Steering Committee or the organisations they represent.
    [Show full text]
  • Melbourne Water's Key EPA Victoria Obligations
    Melbourne Water's Key EPA Victoria Obligations Sewage Transfer System Issue Regulatory Instrument Relevant SOO Required Standard Business response set out in« Key Activities over Water Plan Capital Expenditure ($M) 2009 Water Clause Period Plan Opex ($M) Environment Existing Obligations 2009 Water 2013 Water Plan Plan Spills Wet weather capacity EP Act, SEPP (Waters of New sewers to contain flows associated Sewerage System Review, Spills Northern Sewerage Project and Victoria) with at least one-in-five year rainfall Abatement Program commence Stage 3 of the Spill event. Existing sewers to be upgraded to Abatement Program. Metropolitan achieve containment through agreed Sewerage Strategy improvement plan - Northern sewerage project $192.2M Nil <$1M - Hawthorn main sewer upgrade $1.3M $14.1M <$1M - Kew North branch sewer upgrade $0.7M $7.2M <$1M - Ringwood South branch sewer $82.5M <$1M augmentation System failure As above Manage the sewerage system so that Sewerage System Review, Asset Renewals and maintenance programs BAU Nil spills due to system failure do not occur Management Plans - Melbourne Main Sewer $134.9M Nil <$1M - Mechanical & electrical renewals $31.7M Nil allocation - Werribee River Aqueduct $2.6M Nil <$1M Replacement Nil - Rehabilitation of Merri Creek / $5.8M <$1M Carlton main sewers - Significant civil assets renewals <$1M - North Yarra Main $2.2M duplication/relining $17.9M $21.4M Odour SEPP (Air Quality Management) EPA principles on offensive odours Odour Management Strategy as it Any investment arising from odour BAU relates to the Sewerage Transfer risk and benefit/cost assessments system - East Drop Structure odour control $3.8M Nil <$1M - Sewerage transfer network odour $0.3M Nil control Customer Existing Obligations 2009 Water 2013 Water Plan Plan Sewage quality EPA Licence, SEPP (Waters of SOO Part 5, Application of EPA Victoria Waste Contaminant Management Plans, WTP Review and implement Salt ~$1M Victoria), Bulk Service Trade Waste Hierarchy Principle.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet 16 POST: GPO Box 469, Melbourne, Victoria 3001 National Relay Service: 133 677 March 2016 Ewov.Com.Au FREE and INDEPENDENT 1800 500 509
    ewov.com.au FREE AND INDEPENDENT 1800 500 509 CHARGES ON WATER BILLS (METROPOLITAN WATER CORPORATIONS) Information for residential customers Water charges can be hard to understand. This fact sheet explains the main charges on the bills of residential water customers in Greater Metropolitan Melbourne — and how and when these charges are applied. What can my water corporation bill me Usage charges for? These are charges for the water you use and the There is legislation that sets out how the metropolitan wastewater and sewage you dispose of. water corporations (City West Water, South East Water and Yarra Valley Water) charge. Who pays usage charges? Usage charges are usually payable by the person living in Your water corporation doesn’t set its own prices. It the residential property. submits proposed prices to the Victorian Essential Services Commission (ESC), the independent industry What if there’s a tenant? regulator. The ESC It’s the residential property owner’s responsibility to tell undertakes an the water corporation that the property has a tenant. If inquiry, consults they don’t, they will be liable for the usage charges. about proposed prices, and issues If there’s a separate meter, the residential tenant usually a final pricing pays the usage charges. decision. Water usage charges The metropolitan The metropolitan water corporations use a block tariff water corporations structure for working out water usage charges. don’t all charge the same prices Each water corporation uses three blocks: because their costs differ. For example, • Block 1: 0 – 440 litres/day maintenance costs are higher where • Block 2: 441 – 880 litres/day infrastructure, • Block 3: 881 litres/day and more including pipes and storage and The price of each block differs among the water treatment facilities, corporations.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Supply Options for Melbourne
    Submission to the Environment and Natural Resources Committee Inquiry into Melbourne’s Water Supply Water supply options for Melbourne An examination of costs and availabilities of new water supply sources for Melbourne and other urban areas in Victoria Alan Moran Director, Deregulation Unit, Institute of Public Affairs Institute of Public Affairs Occassional Paper, revised August 2008 Water supply options for Melbourne Summary greenfield developments. Recycling Eastern Treatment Plant (ETP) water appears to be prohibitively costly, while Melbourne’s water supply is suffering from a combination releasing treated water and substituting it for other sources of drought and a failure to build new storage facilities over is also expensive. Some variations of household rainwater the past 23 years when the population has increased by tanks rival the Wonthaggi desalination plant proposal in over 30 per cent. These matters may be aggravated by providing the most expensive solutions. Less expensive is long term climate change diminishing the precipitation to the government’s Sugarloaf approach, but this still entails the traditional sources in the Melbourne catchment. water costing two and a half times that from a new dam in The government policy of matching supply and the Melbourne catchment. demand has been, and largely remains, directed at The table below summarises the estimated costs measures that curtail demand; supply side measures and potential additional water supplies from the more have focused on tapping local sources, mainly through realistic options available. A major new Gippsland dam household water tanks. Additional supply sources have is the lowest cost option, though a river diversion into the been proposed over the past year or so.
    [Show full text]
  • Maroondah Reservoir Park
    Maroondah Reservoir Park The creation of a monumental landscape Lee Andrews ‘Maroondah Reservoir Park: the creation of a monumental landscape’, Provenance: The Journal of Public Record Office Victoria, issue no. 13, 2014. ISSN 1832-2522. Copyright © Lee Andrews. This is a peer reviewed article. Lee Andrews is a heritage consultant specialising in designed landscapes. She has undertaken extensive research into and assessment of the cultural (heritage) significance of numerous sites throughout Victoria. These include regional botanical gardens in Bendigo, Sale, Portland and Daylesford, industrial archaeological sites (Hustlers Reef Reserve gold mining site, Bendigo) and public parks and gardens (Richmond/Burnley Park, Richmond; Queen Victoria and Lansell Gardens and Fernery at Rosalind Park, Bendigo; Canterbury Gardens, Eaglehawk; Lake Weeroona, Bendigo; Burnley Gardens, Richmond; Abbotsford Convent gardens and surrounds, Abbotsford; and Yarra Boulevard and parkland, Richmond). Lee held the position of Chair of the Gardens Committee of the National Trust of Australia (Victoria) for six years between 2003 and 2009. In 2010 Lee was commissioned by Context Pty Ltd to prepare a conservation analysis of Maroondah Reservoir Park for inclusion in a conservation management plan for the Maroondah water supply system, within which the park is situated. Her findings form the basis of the following article. Author email: [email protected] Abstract Documentary records held by Public Record Office Victoria provided detailed accounts of formative This article reveals the previously little-known early landscaping works in the park and yielded new insights history of the Maroondah Reservoir Park, which into many aspects of the park’s development over was developed after completion of the Maroondah the past almost 90 years.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Desalination Plant, the North-South Pipeline And
    THE DESALINATION PLANT, THE NORTH-SOUTH PIPELINE AND THE WELFARE OF MELBURNIANS 56th Annual Conference of Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, Esplanade Hotel, Fremantle, Western Australia, 8-10 February, 2012 Geoff Edwards* [email protected] In the bad drought of the noughties, the availability of water for Australia’s cities and towns was a matter of much concern, and a major political issue. There were severe restrictions on outside use of water in all mainland capitals other than Darwin, and in many regional centres. Desalination plants were built to add to water security in the capital cities of all mainland states. In Victoria, where Melbourne’s water storages fell below 30 per cent, with concerns the capital would run out of water, the Bracks Labor government in June 2007 announced a plan to spend heavily on two new water projects: the largest desalination plant in the southern hemisphere; and a pipeline to bring water to Melbourne from across the Great Dividing Range, with the water being sourced from a share of ‘water saving’ from a one billion dollar modernisation of the ‘old and inefficient’ Goulburn-Murray ‘foodbowl’ irrigation system. Part of the institutional context within which Melbourne’s water investments were made was stated recently by Chloe Munro, chair of the National Water Commission (NWC), which drives water reform under the National Water Initiative (NWI): “The urban water sector in Australia is currently dominated by large government monopoly service providers, and central planning and regulation” (NWC 2011c, p.iv). The Productivity Commission (PC) in its recent major inquiry into urban water found: “Conflicting objectives and unclear roles and responsibilities of governments, water utilities and regulators have led to inefficient allocation of water resources, misdirected investment, undue reliance on water restrictions and costly water conservation programs” (PC 2011, v.1, p.xvi).
    [Show full text]
  • Desalination Order to Secure Our Water Supply for 2021.Pdf Pdf 220.02 KB
    Wednesday, 31 March 2021 DESALINATION ORDER TO SECURE OUR WATER SUPPLY FOR 2021 The Andrews Labor Government has ordered 125 gigalitres from the Victorian Desalination Plant in Wonthaggi to secure Melbourne’s water supply for our growing population. The order is the same as 2019 and 2020 and won’t result in any increase to typical water bills for Melbourne households – which are already among the lowest in the country. In deciding the size of the order Acting Minister for Water Richard Wynne considered current water storage conditions, projected water demands, future climate conditions, risk of system spill and the balance between securing supply and keeping bills stable. High rainfall in key catchments since the last order has helped boost Melbourne’s water storages to 72 per cent – which has reduced the water order from the previously forecast 150 gigalitres to 125 gigalitres. With predicted drier conditions ahead and the underlying trend of declining storage levels, this order will help build a storage buffer to prepare Victoria for drier years to come. The Victorian Desalination plant underpins water security for Melbourne and surrounding regions including Geelong and Ballarat. More than 300 gigalitres of desalinated water has been produced and delivered to the Melbourne system since the first order for water from the desalination plant was placed in 2016. The desalination plant is becoming more and more critical to Victoria’s water security with average rainfall continuing to fall and demand outstripping rainfall by more than 70 gigalitres a year — this gap is set to grow by another 10 gigalitres every year as the population grows and the climate continues to dry.
    [Show full text]
  • Sugarloaf Pipeline South-North Transfer Preliminary Business Case Summary Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning
    Sugarloaf Pipeline South-North Transfer Preliminary Business Case Summary Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning Sugarloaf Pipeline South-North Transfer 2 Sugarloaf Pipeline South-North Transfer Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning Introduction During the Millennium Pipeline to provide water security The key questions asked in the Drought, Victoria made to towns and communities in both preliminary business case were: large investments in the directions. The work has shown that it is technically feasible to • What infrastructure is required state’s water security. The pump water north with additional for bi-directional pumping and Victorian Desalination works to existing infrastructure. It is it technically feasible? Project was commissioned, would require additional capital • How much water can be investment and it is an option that $1 billion dollars was pumped from the Melbourne government will continue to invested in upgrading the system to the Goulburn River? explore. Goulburn-Murray Irrigation • When can water be transferred District, and the water grid The primary benefits available by and where can it be used? was expanded, including sending water north through the building the Sugarloaf Sugarloaf Pipeline include: • Is the infrastructure financially viable? Pipeline. • supplying water to irrigators and private diverters to improve This document summarises the As a consequence of these agricultural productivity; key findings of the preliminary investments, the Victorian business case. Government has determined that • improving water security for up to an additional 75 gigalitres rural towns and urban centres (GL) per year be available for use connected to the water grid; in northern Victoria. This will support industry and farmers, • making water available to be particularly during dry conditions.
    [Show full text]