40059562.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

40059562.Pdf University of Warwick institutional repository: http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap/1162 This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. A Study of the Changing Relationship between Large Corporates and the Inland Revenue By Penelope Ann Louise Tuck A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Warwick Business School, University of Warwick February 2007 Contents Page no Table of Contents ii List of Figures vii List of Abbreviations viii Acknowledgments ix Declaration x Abstract xi Chapter 1- Introduction 1.1 The Research Issues and Questions 1 1.2 The IR: past and present 11 1.3 The Large Corporate Taxpayer 16 1.4 Corporate Tax Compliance 19 1.5 Theoretical Approach 22 1.6 Structure of the Thesis 25 Chapter 2- Setting the Scene: the background to the Corporate Tax Compliance Process 2.1 Introduction 27 2.2 Corporation Tax 27 2.3 Tax Avoidance 31 2.4 'Who is the corporate taxpayer? 36 2.5 Specialist Large Taxpayer Compliance Units (SLTCU) 40 2.6 The `elite professional' nature of large corporates' tax specialists 43 2.7 External Factors 44 2.7 Chapter Summary 45 Chapter 3- Literature Review 3.1 Introduction 47 ii 3.2.1 Tax Research 49 3.2.2 Tax Research as Legal Research 50 3.2.3 Tax Research as Political Science Research 51 3.2.4 Tax Research as Economic Research 53 3.2.5 Tax Research as Accounting Research 55 3.3 Tax Compliance 57 3.3.1 The Taxpayer's perspective 59 3.3.2 The Tax Authority 64 3.3.3 Tax Compliance research summary 73 3.4 New Public Management (NPM) 74 3.5 Links to the Professionalisation Literature 81 3.6 Critical Accounting research 83 3.6.1 Governmentality 88 3.6.2 The use of Foucault to study discourse and practices in tax administration 92 3.7 Chapter Summary 94 Chapter 4- Methodology 4.1 Introduction 96 4.2 Quantitative versus qualitative 100 4.3 Definitions of discourse 103 4.4 Towards a Foucault- based approach to critical discourse analysis 105 -discourse/ power/ knowledge 4.5 Definition of practices 108 4.6 Power, truth and the "subject" 112 4.7 Regimes of truth 116 4.8 Truth and Inquisition Practices 117 4.9 Methods 123 4.10 Selection of research sites 124 4.11 Interview process 126 4.12 Matched pairs 133 4.13 Coding and Computer Aided Qualitative Data Analysis (CAQDAS) 134 4.14 Chapter Summary 136 Chapter 5- The Organisation of the IR 5.1 Introduction 138 111 5.2 Localised operations 139 5.3 The formation of the IR - the emergence of bureaucracy 143 5.4 Bureaucracy and disciplinarity 147 5.5 The Organisational Structure of the IR 147 5.6 The Changing IR 153 5.7 The Modernised IR 155 5.8 Emergence of the Large Groups office 158 5.9 The Large Business Office 162 5.10 NPM versus Bureaucracy 165 5.11 Chapter Summary 167 Chapter 6- Processes and Practices 6.1 Introduction 168 6.2 The Managerial and Strategic IR 168 6.3 Corporate tax compliance 176 6.4 Pre Self Assessment 176 6.5 Corporate Tax Self Assessment 178 6.6 Impact of CTSA 179 6.7 Divergent structure and processesand uncertainty 182 6.8 Secondary practices 184 6.9 The Event of 'Negotiations': Emergent Procedures 186 6.10 Resistance 192 6.11 Chapter Summary 196 Chapter 7- The Knowledge Expert - the Tax Official 7.1 Introduction 198 7.2 The IR's Representative 201 7.3 The Tax Official -the Inspector of Taxes 203 7.4 Shaping the knowledge expert 205 7.5 Formal training 207 7.6 Technical Knowledge 208 iv 7.7 Investigative approach 212 7.8 Immersion in the IR discourse - implicit training 215 7.9 Immersion in the IR discourse - organisational structure 217 7.10 Business Sectorisation 219 7.11 Specialist Knowledge 221 7.12 Discussion 224 Chapter 8- The Corporate taxpayer reconceptualised as a Customer 8.1 Introduction 228 8.2 Who is the corporate taxpayer? 231 8.3 The choice of customer discourse 232 8.4 Duty of care from service provider 237 8.5 The objectivization of the customer (Stage One): a way of challenging the 239 provider `as jr they had customers 8.6 Customer relationship building 241 8.7 The objectivization of the customer (Stage Two): the institutional 245 emergence of the visible customer 8.8 Chapter Summary 248 Chapter 9- The Event of Compliance 9.1 Introduction 249 9.2 New Style CompliancePractices 253 9.3 Managing the process of meeting the Customer 257 9.4 Managing the process of meeting the IR Official 258 9.5 Outward facing discourse with tax managers and tax professionals 259 9.6 The Truth Game and the Customer 263 9.7 Chapter Summary 265 Chapter 10 - Conclusion 10.1 Introduction 267 10.2 The Changing Process 267 10.3 The Managed Process 269 V 10.4 Limitations of the Study 270 10.5 Contribution 271 10.6 Future Research 274 Appendices Appendix 1- List of interviews carried out 276 Appendix 2- Interview questionnaire - Case Directors 278 Appendix 3- Interview questionnaire - Tax Advisors 282 Appendix 4- Interview questionnaire - Tax Managers 285 Bibliography 288 VI Page List of Figures no 1 The "two box" entity 13 2 The Inland Revenue `boxology' 15 3 The compliance/ non-compliance continuum 31 4 Organisation Structure of an in house Tax Department 39 of a FTSE 100 group of companies 5 Patterns of Corporate Tax Compliance and ways of shaping risk management 72 systemsfor taxpayers and tax advisors 6 Different Approaches to Discourse Analysis 104 7 Organisational Structure of the IR as at 31 March 1969 149 8 IR Organisation Chart as at 31 March 1976 150 9 Organisational Structure of the IR as at 31 March 1983 152 10 Organisational Chart of the IR as at September 1993 154 11 Organisational Chart of the IR as at 31 March 2004 156 prior to the merger with HM Customs & Excise 12 Inland RevenueCompliance Model 172 vii List of Abbreviations ATO Australian Tax Office BIR Board of the Inland Revenue CPA Certified Public Accountants CTSA Corporate Tax Self Assessment CRAKA Centre for Researchin Accounting Knowledge and Accountability HMRC HM Revenueand Customs ITSA Income Tax Self Assessment IR Inland Revenue IRS Internal Revenue Service IMF International Monetary Fund LBO Large Business Office LBS Large Business Service LCF Large CorporatesForum NCP New Compliance Process NPM New Public Management SLTCU Specialist Large Taxpayer Compliance Units SV ShareValuation Division of the IR vi" Acknowledgements I wish to thank my supervisor Professor Keith Hoskin for both his encouragementand the intellectually demanding and enjoyable supervisions which have enlightened me to new ways of thinking. I also wish to thank my latterly second supervisor, Dr Lynne Oats for her encouragement, support and friendship and also my former second supervisor before her move to the US, Dr Margaret Lamb for her enthusiasm to open up the tax administration researchagenda. The thesis could not have been completed without the generous funding of the Chartered Accountants' Trust for Education and Research of Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales and all the interviewees who have given their time freely and generously. I expressmy thanks to all concerned. I thank my fellow 'PhD pals' who have offered great support and excellent friendship throughout this experience: Layla Branicki, Derek Condon, Ken Le Meunier- Fitzhugh, and Michael Nottage. Obviously I could not have completed this thesis without the great support and sacrifices of my family and I wish to thank, my husband Paul for his love and wise advice, my son Alexander for his determination and confidence in me and my father, Arthur for being there to laugh! This thesis is dedicated to Paul, Alexander, Arthur and Priscilla (1925 - 2000). lx Declaration This is to declare that: I am responsible for the work submitted in this thesis. This work has been written by me All verbatim extracts have been distinguished and sources specifically acknowledged During the preparation of this thesis, a paper was prepared as listed below. The remaining parts of the thesis are unpublished. Tuck, Penelope (2004) `No Accounting for Taste: Remaking the Large Corporate Taxpayer into a Visible Customer'. Paper presented at the European Accounting Association Conference, Prague, Czech Republic, April 2004 and also presented at the British Accounting Association Conference, University of York, April 2004. This work has not previously been submitted with in a degree programme at this or any other institution. Signature: Peý. ýge SAVL. k k' Date: 2 9-0-4 X Abstract This thesis addressesthe following researchquestions: 1. How is the process of corporate tax compliance changing for large groups of companies? 2. How is this process being managed by the Inland Revenue? The empirical evidence consists of 33 interviews conducted in 2002-04 with IR officials; tax directors and tax managersof large corporates; and tax partners from a Big 4 accounting firm. This thesis also draws upon archival data including state papersand documentary data from the IR. Theoretically this thesis draws from the new public management,administration, and the tax compliance literatures. However I argue that an approach grounded purely in these literatures does not adequately explain the changing tax compliance environment for large groups.
Recommended publications
  • Men and Women Working Together for Real Change
    Men and women working together for real change June 2017 30% Club . The 30% Club is a global campaign that signs up Chairs and CEOs to take action to create a better balance of men and women at all levels of their organisations as a business imperative rather than a ‘women’s issue’. The Club launched in the UK in 2010 with a target of a minimum of 30% women on FTSE-100 boards by 2015. There are 215 members of the UK Club and the proportion of female FTSE-100 directors has risen from 12.5% to 27%*. As of 2016 the scope of the above target was extended to a minimum of 30% women on FTSE-350 boards by end 2020 (currently at 23.5%*) . In tandem with the above – and in order to ensure that this 30% remains sustainable – we have also established a pipeline target of a minimum of 30% women at senior management level of FTSE-100 companies by 2020 (currently 19.4% at Executive Committee level**). The 30% Club is becoming an international community. It complements and amplifies individual company efforts and existing initiatives through collaboration, sharing of best practice, measurable goals and joined-up actions. The 30% Club does not believe in mandatory quotas. Instead, the 30% Club is aiming for meaningful, sustainable, business- led change, as recommended by the Davies and Hampton-Alexander Reviews. Scarce representation of women at senior levels is a global phenomenon. Local 30% Clubs have been launched in the US, Hong Kong, Ireland, Southern Africa, Australia, Malaysia, Canada, Italy, the GCC and Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Men and Women Working Together for Real Change
    Men and women working together for real change May 2017 30% Club . The 30% Club is a global campaign that signs up Chairs and CEOs to take action to create a better balance of men and women at all levels of their organisations as a business imperative rather than a ‘women’s issue’. The Club launched in the UK in 2010 with a target of a minimum of 30% women on FTSE-100 boards by 2015. There are 210 members of the UK Club and the proportion of female FTSE-100 directors has risen from 12.5% to 27%*. As of 2016 the scope of the above target was extended to a minimum of 30% women on FTSE-350 boards by end 2020 (currently at 23.5%*) . In tandem with the above – and in order to ensure that this 30% remains sustainable – we have also established a pipeline target of a minimum of 30% women at senior management level of FTSE-100 companies by 2020 (currently 19.4% at Executive Committee level**). The 30% Club is becoming an international community. It complements and amplifies individual company efforts and existing initiatives through collaboration, sharing of best practice, measurable goals and joined-up actions. The 30% Club does not believe in mandatory quotas. Instead, the 30% Club is aiming for meaningful, sustainable, business- led change, as recommended by the Davies and Hampton-Alexander Reviews. Scarce representation of women at senior levels is a global phenomenon. Local 30% Clubs have been launched in the US, Hong Kong, Ireland, Southern Africa, Australia, Malaysia, Canada, Italy, the GCC and Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Inland Revenue Accounts 2002-03
    Presented pursuant to the GRA At 2000 c20. s.6 and the Exchequer & Audit Departments Act 1921 c52. s.2 Department of Inland Revenue 2002-03 Accounts - Consolidated Resource Accounts Published by TSO (The Stationery Office) and available from: Online - Trust Statement www.tso.co.uk/bookshop Mail, Telephone, Fax & E-mail TSO - Standard Report PO Box 29, Norwich NR3 1GN Telephone orders/General enquiries 0870 600 5522 Fax orders 0870 600 5533 Order through the Parliamentary Hotline Lo-call 0845 7 023474 E-mail [email protected] Textphone 0870 240 3701 TSO Shops 123 Kingsway, London WC2B 6PQ 020 7242 6393 Fax 020 7242 6394 68-69 Bull Street, Birmingham B4 6AD 0121 236 9696 Fax 0121 236 9699 9-21 Princess Street, Manchester M60 8AS 0161 834 7201 Fax 0161 833 0634 16 Arthur Street, Belfast BT1 4GD 028 9023 8451 Fax 028 9023 5401 18-19 High Street, Cardiff CF10 1PT 029 2039 5548 Fax 029 2038 4347 71 Lothian Road, Edinburgh EH3 9AZ 0870 606 5566 Fax 0870 606 5588 The Parliamentary Bookshop 12 Bridge Street, Parliament Square, London SW1A 2JX ISBN 0-10-292335-3 Telephone orders/General enquiries 020 7219 3890 Fax orders 020 7219 3866 LONDON: The Stationery Office 19 November 2003 TSO Accredited Agents HC 1072 £14.50 (see Yellow Pages) and through good booksellers 9 780102 923353 909237_cvr / sig1 / plateA 909237_cvr / sig1 / plateB Presented pursuant to the GRA At 2000 c20. s.6 and the Exchequer & Audit Departments Act 1921 c52. s.2 Department of Inland Revenue Accounts 2002 - 03 - Consolidated Resource Accounts - Trust Statement - Standard
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Evolution of the Board'
    ‘The Evolution of the Board’ 16 October 2014 #30pcevolution @30percentclub www.30percentclub.org The UK’s voluntary, business-led approach towards creating better gender balanced corporate boards has been influenced by the belief that this will help create more effective boards. Since the launch of the 30% Club in November 2010 and the publication of the Davies Report in February 2011, multiple efforts on the part of many organisations have resulted in real change in both board composition and the board review process. This short, intensive seminar will bring together a number of contributors to review the collective impact – and consider what more needs to be done. We will hear from key FTSE-100 and FTSE-250 Chairmen, who will share their views about what makes for an effective Board today and how the NED appointment process has developed, in conversation with leading board recruitment specialists. Leading investors will explain how their engagement with companies on the topic has evolved – with a particular focus on succession planning. We will also hear from the specialist board effectiveness review industry and from consultants working to help boards make further improvements. There is of course considerable momentum towards achieving our 2015 goals for more women on boards. This seminar is aimed at Agenda building this momentum, with the emphasis being on the need for an ongoing joined-up and iterative approach towards not just more women but greater cognitive diversity in the Boardroom. ‘The Evolution of the Board’ 16 October 2014
    [Show full text]
  • University of Birmingham a Tale of the Merger Between the Inland Revenue and HM Customs & Excise
    University of Birmingham A Tale of the Merger between the Inland Revenue and HM Customs & Excise Tuck, Penelope; De Cogan, Dominic; Snape, John License: None: All rights reserved Document Version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (Harvard): Tuck, P, De Cogan, D & Snape, J 2019, A Tale of the Merger between the Inland Revenue and HM Customs & Excise. in P Harris & D De Cogan (eds), Studies in the History of Tax Law Volume 9. 1st edn, Studies in the History of Tax Law, Hart Publishing. <https://www.bloomsburyprofessional.com/uk/studies-in-the-history-of-tax- law-volume-9-9781509924936/> Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: This is an author-produced version of the following chapter: Tuck et al (2019) A Tale of the Merger between the Inland Revenue and HM Customs & Excise In. Harris & de Cogan (Eds.) Studies in the History of Tax Law, Volume 9. Published by Hart Publishing. The final published version can be accessed here: https://www.bloomsburyprofessional.com/uk/studies-in-the-history-of-tax-law-volume-9-9781509924936/ General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research.
    [Show full text]
  • PFI: the STEPS Deal
    House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts PFI: The STEPS deal Twentieth Report of Session 2004–05 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 6 April 2005 HC 553 Incorporating HC 1211-i, Session 2003–04 Published on 14 June 2005 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £10.00 The Committee of Public Accounts The Committee of Public Accounts is appointed by the House of Commons to examine “the accounts showing the appropriation of the sums granted by Parliament to meet the public expenditure, and of such other accounts laid before Parliament as the committee may think fit” (Standing Order No 148). Membership Mr Edward Leigh MP (Conservative, Gainsborough) (Chairman) Mr Richard Allan MP (Liberal Democrat, Sheffield Hallam) Mr Richard Bacon MP (Conservative, South Norfolk) Mrs Angela Browning MP (Conservative, Tiverton and Honiton) Jon Cruddas MP (Labour, Dagenham) Rt Hon David Curry MP (Conservative, Skipton and Ripon) Mr Ian Davidson MP (Labour, Glasgow Pollock) Rt Hon Frank Field MP (Labour, Birkenhead) Mr Brian Jenkins MP (Labour, Tamworth) Mr Nigel Jones MP (Liberal Democrat, Cheltenham) Jim Sheridan MP (Labour, West Renfrewshire) Mr Siôn Simon MP (Labour, Birmingham Erdington) Mr Gerry Steinberg MP (Labour, City of Durham) Mr Stephen Timms MP (Labour, East Ham) Jon Trickett MP (Labour, Hemsworth) Rt Hon Alan Williams MP (Labour, Swansea West) Powers Powers of the Committee of Public Accounts are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 148. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • Good Government
    House of Commons Public Administration Select Committee Good Government Eighth Report of Session 2008–09 Report, together with formal minutes Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 9 June 2009 HC 97-I Published on 18 June 2009 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Public Administration Select Committee The Public Administration Select Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the reports of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration and the Health Service Commissioner for England, which are laid before this House, and matters in connection therewith, and to consider matters relating to the quality and standards of administration provided by civil service departments, and other matters relating to the civil service. Current membership Dr Tony Wright MP (Labour, Cannock Chase) (Chairman) Mr David Burrowes MP (Conservative, Enfield Southgate) Paul Flynn MP (Labour, Newport West) David Heyes MP (Labour, Ashton under Lyne) Kelvin Hopkins MP (Labour, Luton North) Mr Ian Liddell-Grainger MP (Conservative, Bridgwater) Julie Morgan MP (Labour, Cardiff North) Mr Gordon Prentice MP (Labour, Pendle) Paul Rowen MP (Liberal Democrats, Rochdale) Mr Charles Walker MP (Conservative, Broxbourne) Jenny Willott MP (Liberal Democrats, Cardiff Central) Powers The powers of the Committee are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 146. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published
    [Show full text]
  • IN CORPORATION TAX REFORM by EDWARD JOHN SNAPE
    PUBLIC LAW AND PUBLIC MANAGEMENT: ‘THEORY’ AND ‘VALUES’ IN CORPORATION TAX REFORM by EDWARD JOHN SNAPE M.A. (Oxon.), Solicitor A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Birmingham Law School, The University of Birmingham, April 2008. University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT Reforming the UK’s corporation tax code is becoming more of a widespread political concern than the preoccupation of specialists. This functionalist study offers an interpretation, and assesses the arguments. It views the corporation tax code as public law, energised by political values whose meaning and prioritisation are shaped by the prudential logic of effectiveness. The institutions that generate the code, and the challenges of globalisation to the nation state, have highlighted historic tensions between Crown and Parliament, and the latter’s scrutiny of the managerialist governance style that the code’s reform involves. This style is apparent in the ideology of the public interest that reform is designed to promote, a process that involves the skilful balancing of efficiency and fairness. Surprisingly, perhaps, there is little in the conduct of reform that violates the traditions of the UK’s representative democracy.
    [Show full text]