AGENDA Greater Asheville Regional Airport Authority Regular Meeting Friday, March 12, 2021, 8:30 A.M. Conference Room at Administrative Offices

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AGENDA Greater Asheville Regional Airport Authority Regular Meeting Friday, March 12, 2021, 8:30 A.M. Conference Room at Administrative Offices _____________________________________________________________ AGENDA Greater Asheville Regional Airport Authority Regular Meeting Friday, March 12, 2021, 8:30 a.m. Conference Room at Administrative Offices NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC: The Airport Authority welcomes comments from the public on any agenda item. Comments are received prior to the Board’s discussion of the agenda item. Comments are limited to five minutes. In compliance with the state-wide mandate for COVID-19, members of the public may attend the Authority Board meeting at 8:30 a.m. on Friday, March 12, 2021 via Webex: 1-844-621-3956; Meeting Number (access code): 132 343 5085 I. CALL TO ORDER II. SERVICE AWARD PRESENTATIONS: A. Ricky Peterson – 15 Years III. PRESENTATIONS: A. Update on Design of Terminal Expansion IV. FINANCIAL REPORT (document) V. CONSENT ITEMS: A. Approve the Greater Asheville Regional Airport Authority February 5, 2021 Regular Meeting Minutes (document) B. Approve the Greater Asheville Regional Airport Authority February 19, 2021 Special Meeting Minutes (document) VI. OLD BUSINESS: None GREATER ASHEVILLE REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY AGENDA Friday, March 12, 2021 Page 2 VII. NEW BUSINESS: A. Preliminary Approval of Authority’s Amended Ordinance of Airline Rates, Fees and Charges for the Asheville Regional Airport (document) B. Approval of the Authority’s Preliminary Fiscal Year 2021/2022 Budget (document) C. Approve Design Contract with Pond & Company, Inc. for the Air Traffic Control Tower and Associated Facilities Project (document) D. Approval of Audit Contract for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2021 (document) E. Approval for Acceptance of Interest for the Development, Financing, Management, and Operation of a Commercial Hotel with Conference Center and Existing 18-Hole Golf Course (document) VIII. DIRECTOR’S REPORT: A. Updated Industry Statistics IX. INFORMATION SECTION: (Staff presentations will not be made on these items. Staff will be available to address questions from the Board.) A. January 2021 Traffic Report (document) B. January 2021 Monthly Financial Report (document) C. March 2021 Development/Project Status Report (document) D. Potential Board Items for the Next Regular Meeting: • Public Hearing and Final Approval of Amended Ordinance of Airline Rates, Fees and Charges • Public Hearing and Final Adoption of the Authority’s Fiscal Year FY2021/2022 Budget GREATER ASHEVILLE REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY AGENDA Friday, March 12, 2021 Page 3 X. PUBLIC AND TENANTS’ COMMENTS In compliance with the state-wide mandate for COVID-19, Public and Tenant Comments will be as follows: 1. Please fill out a Comment Card located on the airport website here: https://flyavl.com/boardcomment by 3:00 pm on Thursday, March 11, 2021 2. Comments received, as specified above, shall be read during this Agenda period. XI. CALL FOR NEXT MEETING: April 9, 2021 XII. CLOSED SESSION: Pursuant to Subsections 143-318.11 (a) (3) and (4) of the General Statutes of North Carolina to Consult with Legal Counsel in Order to Preserve the Attorney- Client Privilege and to Discuss Matters Relating to the Location and/or Expansion of Industries or Other Businesses in the Area Served by the Authority, Including Agreement on a Tentative List of Economic Development Incentives that may be Offered by the Authority in Negotiations. XIII. AUTHORITY MEMBER REPORTS: A. Key Strategic Elements (document) XIV. ADJOURNMENT This agenda of the Greater Asheville Regional Airport Authority is provided as a matter of convenience to the public. It is not the official agenda. Although every effort is made to provide complete and accurate information in this agenda, the Greater Asheville Regional Airport Authority does not warrant or guarantee its accuracy or completeness for any purpose. The agenda is subject to change before and/or during the Board meeting. Asheville Regional Airport Executive Summary January-21 AIRPORT ACTIVITY Variance to Calendar Variance to Month Prior Year Year to Date Prior Year Passenger Enplanements 22,658 (60.9%) 22,658 (60.9%) Aircraft Operations Commercial 1,268 (29.2%) 1,268 (29.2%) Scheduled Flights 560 (35.3%) Flight Cancellations 46 Seats 45,623 (42.5%) 45,623 (42.5%) Load Factor 49.7% (32.1%) 49.7% (32.1%) General Aviation 2,477 (25.6%) 2,477 (25.6%) Military 234 59.2% 234 59.2% FINANCIAL RESULTS Variance Fiscal Variance Month to Budget Year to Date to Budget Operating Revenues $ 735,131 (22.0%) $ 5,381,746 (18.4%) Operating Expenses 768,156 (16.5%) 5,010,576 (26.8%) Net Operating Revenues before Depreciation $ (33,025) $ 371,170 Net Non-Operating Revenues $ 119,776 (60.6%) $ 8,764,326 311.6% Broadmoor Net Income $ (51,451) $ 99,964 Grants: FAA AIP Grants $ 2,509,553 $ 9,488,603 NC Dept of Transportation Grants - 6,663,293 Total $ 2,509,553 $ 16,151,896 CARES Funding $ - $ 7,256,480 CASH Restricted $ 10,065,863 Designated for O&M Reserve 5,384,122 O&M Reserve - used for current operations per Board approval (57,670) Designated for Emergency Repair 650,000 Unrestricted, Undesignated - Total $ 16,042,315 Broadmoor Cash Balance $ 149,171 RECEIVABLES PAST DUE Total 1-30 Days 31-60 Days Over 60 Days Advertising Customers 14,935 4,900 - 10,035 Allegiant 67,124 61,623 1,822 3,679 American 14,489 14,489 - - Delta 8,790 3,136 - 5,654 Elite 280 - - 280 FAA 592 - - 592 Paradies 6,282 6,250 - 32 Signature 37 - - 37 Spirit 4,404 - - 4,404 Travelers 2,882 - - 2,882 TSA 26,377 4,325 9,750 12,302 United 22,889 633 16,224 6,032 World Fuel Services 1,508 125 1,383 Worldwide 9,265 - - 9,265 Miscellaneous 18,366 329 - 18,037 Total $ 198,219 $ 95,810 $ 27,796 $ 74,613 % of Total Receivables 21.40% Note: Excludes balances paid subsequent to month-end. Also excludes Board-approved deferred rents of $265,414 for August and September REVENUE BONDS PAYABLE Original Amount Current Balance Parking Garage Revenue Bond, Series 2016A $ 15,750,000 $ 15,750,000 Parking Garage Taxable Revenue Bond, Series 2016B 5,250,000 555,000 $ 21,000,000 $ 16,305,000 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES Annual Budget $ 71,195,660 Year-to-Date Spending $ 27,015,510 REGULAR MEETING GREATER ASHEVILLE REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY February 5, 2021 The Greater Asheville Regional Airport Authority (“Authority”) met on Friday, February 5, 2021 at 8:30 a.m. in the Conference Room at the Authority’s Administrative Offices, Asheville Regional Airport (“Airport”), 61 Terminal Drive, Suite 1, Asheville, NC 28732. MEMBERS PRESENT IN PERSON: Matthew C. Burril, Chair; Brad Galbraith, Vice- Chair; and Britt Lovin MEMBERS PRESENT VIA VIDEO: Carl H. Ricker, Jr.; and Susan Russo Klein MEMBERS ABSENT: George H. Erwin, Jr.; and Thomas M. Apodaca STAFF PRESENT IN PERSON: Lew Bleiweis, Executive Director; Michael Reisman, Deputy Executive Director; Samuel Sales, Interim Chief of Public Safety; Michael Merideth, Systems Administrator; and Ellen Heywood, Clerk to the Board STAFF AND LEGAL COUNSEL PRESENT VIA VIDEO: Cindy Rice, Authority Legal Counsel; Tina Kinsey, Director of Marketing and Public Relations; Janet Burnette, Director of Finance and Accounting; Shane Stockman, IT Director; John Coon, Director of Operations and Maintenance; Lisa Jump, Director of Administration and Human Resources; Christina Madsen, Properties and Contracts Manager; and Jared Merrill, Airport Planning Manager ALSO PRESENT VIA TELEPHONE/VIDEO: Adam McGuire, LandDesign; Rhett Crocker, LandDesign; David Wood, Pond Company; James Moose, Avcon; Jon McCalmont, Parrish & Partners; and Sandra Kilgore, Asheville City Council CALL TO ORDER: The Chair called the meeting to order at 8:30 a.m. SERVICE AWARD PRESENTATION: The Chair recognized Michael Reisman with a service award and gift for his 10 years of service with the Authority. PRESENTATIONS: A. LandDesign: The Director informed the Board that staff has been working with LandDesign over the past few months to plan for the development of the airport’s non- aeronautical property in order to increase revenue to help support the aviation system. The Director further stated that staff would use the plan as a guide for future development if the Board was satisfied with the plan created by LandDesign. Adam McGuire and Rhett Crocker with LandDesign delivered a high-level presentation which identified the non-aeronautical parcels LandDesign was tasked to research. Mr. McGuire stated that due to constraints such as the flood plain and steep slope topography, far less of the approximate 400 acres would be considered developable. Mr. McGuire also stated that as part of their process in preparing the plan, input from several different stakeholder groups was received. Mr. McGuire gave an overview for each parcel of land as well as the type of zoning and potential options for use for each of the areas. Mr. McGuire was asked what the overall feeling was for development of these areas and Mr. McGuire responded that the stakeholders were very supportive of the idea of development of these areas. A brief discussion took place that included timeline for development of some of the areas, being good partners with local economic development groups on future growth, as well as a thoughtful approach and preservation of some of the surrounding views. The Board thanked Mr. McGuire and Mr. Crocker for their presentation. FINANCIAL REPORT: A review of enplanements, aircraft operations, and general aviation activity for the month of December was provided by the Director. Janet Burnette reported on the financial activity for the month of December. A brief discussion took place regarding anticipated revenue and expenses through the end of the current fiscal year as well as enplanement projections. Mr. Ricker experienced video interruption and left the meeting at 9:40 a.m. CONSENT ITEMS: A. Approve the Greater Asheville Regional Airport Authority December 11, 2020 Regular Meeting Minutes: Mr. Lovin moved to approve the Greater Asheville Regional Airport Authority December 11, 2020 Regular Meeting Minutes.
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 2 – Aviation Demand Forecast
    CHAPTER 2 AVIATION FORECASTS Oscoda – Wurtsmith Airport Authority Oscoda-Wurtsmith Airport Master Plan CHAPTER 2 AVIATION FORECAST Aviation forecasts are time-based projections offering a reasonable expectation of future Oscoda- Wurtsmith Airport activity during the 20-year planning period (2010-2030). Forecasts influence virtually all phases of the planning process, as the relationship between activity and projected demand indicates the type, extent, and timing of Airport improvements for various triggers of Airport infrastructure, equipment and service needs. Primarily, the forecast of aircraft activity is used to quantify the Airport’s operational peaking and capacity characteristics, determine the sizing and space allocation for structures and site development, and form the basis to evaluate the feasibility of various development options. Overall, the forecast predictions attempt to account for factors at Oscoda which could likely influence projections in some significant or substantial way; whether an occurrence of past trends or an assumption of future expectations. As indicated in Chapter 1, the FAA Terminal Area Forecasts (TAF) combined with the forecasts developed for the Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) operations continues to support the Boeing 747 heavy widebody aircraft as the Airport’s most demanding, or critical aircraft, used for future facility planning and design purposes. The following forecast components are assessed in this chapter: Aircraft Operations – The number of aircraft landings and takeoffs conducted annually by local and itinerant traffic, including general aviation, commercial and military users. ‘Local’ operations are flights performed in the Airport traffic pattern vicinity, including proficiency training, instrument training and flights from nearby airports. ‘Itinerant’ operations are traffic arriving and departing from beyond the local vicinity.
    [Show full text]
  • Palm Beach International Airport (PBI)
    Agenda Item:~ PALM BEACH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY -===================================================================== Meeting Date: January 12, 2021 [ ] Consent [ X] Regular [ ] Ordinance [ ] Public Hearing Submitted By: Department of Airports ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I. EXECUTIVE BRIEF Motion and Title: Staff recommends motion to approve: a Contract for Air Service Development Consulting Services (Contract) with Ailevon Pacific Aviation Consulting LLC (Ailevon), a Florida limited liability company, commencing on February 1, 2021, and expiring on January 31, 2024, with one 24-month option to renew for an amount not to exceed $200,000 per contract year for a total not to exceed amount of $600,000 for the initial term. Summary: This Contract provides for professional and technical consulting services on an as-needed basis in support of the air service development program for the Palm Beach International Airport (PBI). Ailevon's principal place of business is Atlanta, GA. Air service development consulting services may include, but are not limited to, air service strategy and planning, airline route study and forecasting, competitive service analysis, business case development for new/expanded air service, development of incentive programs, catchment area demographic and leakage studies and analysis of air traffic demand and airfare data. The Contract provides for a not to exceed amount of $200,000 per contract year with an initial three-year term and an option to renew for an additional 24 months at the County's sole option. Due to lack of availability of qualified Small/Minority/Women Owned Business Enterprises providing the services required by this Contract, the Office of Equal Business Opportunity issued a waiver of Affirmative Procurement Initiatives on July 30, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Airport Authority of Rock Island County, Illinois
    METROPOLITAN AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF ROCK ISLAND COUNTY, ILLINOIS QUAD CITY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT P.O. BOX 9009 MOLINE, IL 61265-9009 309-764-9621 TEL 309-757-1515 FAX Airport Security and Safety Violations ______________________________________________________________________________ GENERAL The Transportation Security Administration and Federal Aviation Administration require that airports have a policy for non-compliance with Federal Regulations or Airport Policies and Procedures. The Airport’s Security and Driver training addresses violations and states that four or more types of security violations within 12 months may result in permanent revocation of an employee’s ID media. POLICIES AND PROCEDURES The following consequences will be enforced when Public Safety has determined that a violation of Federal Regulations and/or Airport Policy and Procedures has occurred. Ongoing records of violations are maintained in each employee’s Airport file. 12 months after the date of the first violation, the violation will be considered inactive and the process starts over. First Violation: The employee will be required to retrain within 10 days of notice. The ID Media will be confiscated by Public Safety if the retraining is not completed. Second Violation: The employee will be required to retrain within 10 days of notice and will be assessed a $50 fine. The ID Media will be confiscated by Public Safety if the retraining is not completed and/or the fine is not paid. Third Violation: The employee will be required to retrain within 10 days of notice and will be assessed a $100 fine. The ID Media will be confiscated by Public Safety if the retraining is not completed and/or the fine is not paid.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Police Officer Duties & Responsibilities Document
    Career Opportunity Memphis-Shelby County Airport Authority Job Title: Airport Police Officer (Nonexempt) Department: Airport Police Deadline to Apply: Open Until Filled Annual Rate: $52,889.82 - $62,223.20 Job Number: 2021-06-17 PSAPO About the Job Under moderate supervision, maintains public order, prevents crimes, enforces laws and ordinances, protects life and property, and provides public safety within departmental policies and guidelines. Performs tasks mandated by federal government pertaining to civil aviation security regulations in a courteous and professional manner. An Airport Police Officer is an armed peace officer of the State of Tennessee and may work in uniform or plain clothes assignments. Responsibilities 1. Patrols designated area by foot, car, and other means to preserve law and order, discover and deter crimes. Enforces federal and state laws and regulations, local ordinances, Airport Security Program requirements, and airport rules and regulations. Provides written reports of all activity. 2. Responds to law enforcement calls for service, security breaches, violations of security regulations and trespasses. Takes appropriate law enforcement action as required or assigned. Assesses situation’s apparent facts before acting. Uses physical force and police trained methods when necessary. Maintains self- composure and acts with a high degree of integrity and independence while preforming duties. 3. Directs vehicular traffic, investigates vehicular accidents on Airport property and produces detailed written accident reports. 4. Provides general and aviation related information to the public, airport tenants and employees 5. Implements appropriate emergency procedures in the event of aircraft accidents, including crowd control, and safeguarding of lives and property. During off-duty hours, responds to an emergency upon request of proper authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Employee Interline Travel Agreement
    Interline Staff Travel Agreement Personal and Duty Travel Version 15 Effective 1 June 2019 INTERLINE STAFF TRAVEL AGREEMENT (ISTA) TABLE OF CONTENTS PREAMBLE ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 DEFINITIONS .................................................................................................................................................. 1 A. ADMINISTRATION .......................................................................................................................................... 3 A.1. FULL MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENTS ..................................................................................................... 3 A.2. ASSOCIATE MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENTS .......................................................................................... 4 A.4. MEMBERSHIP CODE OF PRACTICE, RESPONSIBILITIES AND OBLIGATIONS ........................................... 5 A.5. SAF PROCEDURES .................................................................................................................................. 6 A.6. MEMBERSHIP LIMITATION, RESIGNATION, AND TERMINATION .......................................................... 7 A.7. MANAGEMENT .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Why Some Airport-Rail Links Get Built and Others Do Not: the Role of Institutions, Equity and Financing
    Why some airport-rail links get built and others do not: the role of institutions, equity and financing by Julia Nickel S.M. in Engineering Systems- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2010 Vordiplom in Wirtschaftsingenieurwesen- Universität Karlsruhe, 2007 Submitted to the Department of Political Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Political Science at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY February 2011 © Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2011. All rights reserved. Author . Department of Political Science October 12, 2010 Certified by . Kenneth Oye Associate Professor of Political Science Thesis Supervisor Accepted by . Roger Peterson Arthur and Ruth Sloan Professor of Political Science Chair, Graduate Program Committee 1 Why some airport-rail links get built and others do not: the role of institutions, equity and financing by Julia Nickel Submitted to the Department of Political Science On October 12, 2010, in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Political Science Abstract The thesis seeks to provide an understanding of reasons for different outcomes of airport ground access projects. Five in-depth case studies (Hongkong, Tokyo-Narita, London- Heathrow, Chicago- O’Hare and Paris-Charles de Gaulle) and eight smaller case studies (Kuala Lumpur, Seoul, Shanghai-Pudong, Bangkok, Beijing, Rome- Fiumicino, Istanbul-Atatürk and Munich- Franz Josef Strauss) are conducted. The thesis builds on existing literature that compares airport-rail links by explicitly considering the influence of the institutional environment of an airport on its ground access situation and by paying special attention to recently opened dedicated airport expresses in Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • THE RISE of CARGO-FOCUSED HUB AIRPORTS PANDEMIC YEAR 2020 Chaddick Policy Brief | March 25, 2021 by Joseph P
    THE RISE OF CARGO-FOCUSED HUB AIRPORTS PANDEMIC YEAR 2020 Chaddick Policy Brief | March 25, 2021 By Joseph P. Schwieterman and Euan Hague Our analysis of newly released air cargo traffic data for 2020 shows that: Tonnage at cargo-focused hub airports, i.e., airports with extensive cargo traffic but little or no passenger traffic, grew 31.4% from 2019 to 2020 Chicago Rockford, Wilmington Air Park, Ft. Worth Alliance, and Boeing Field/King Co. airports were among the leaders of the 14 cargo-focused hubs identified A surge in online buying for at-home delivery is fueling much of the growth Airports that are focal points for air freight integrators DHL, FedEx, and UPS and have more passenger traffic than cargo-focused hubs grew more slowly, yet at a still substantial 9.0% rate The rapid growth raises important social, economic, and environmental questions he emergence, evolution, and performance of specialized cargo airports have long been of T interest to investors and policymakers in the United States.1 This Chaddick Policy Brief reviews the recent growth of cargo-focused hub airports, i.e., airports that have significant roles in cargo movement while handling a low volume of passenger traffic. Examples of such airports are California’s Sacramento Mather and Ft. Worth Alliance airports. This Brief reviews findings from our analysis of newly released 2020 data and offers brief case studies of six prominent cargo-focused hub airports. CHADDICK INSTITUTE FOR METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AT DEPAUL UNIVERSITY CONTACT: JOSEPH SCHWIETERMAN, PH.D. | PHONE: 312.362.5732 | EMAIL: [email protected] PHOTO CREDIT (ABOVE): A UPS MD 11 AT SAN BERNARDINO INT’L, JAN.
    [Show full text]
  • Airfield Driver Training Program
    Airfield Driver Training Program *This handbook is provided by the Erie Regional Airport Authority to acquaint all employees with the local procedures for operating vehicles on the airport. These rules and regulations are subject to change should circumstances dictate a need to revisit these procedures. It is the responsibility of airport management to disseminate pertinent changes and additions to this handbook. It is the responsibility of the tenant, employee, or contractor to ensure that all employees are properly trained in the policies and procedures for the operation of ground vehicles at the Erie International Airport. 1 ERI movement area drivers training 08162019 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................3 DRIVERS TRAINING ..................................................................................................................................................4 NON-COMPLIANCE....................................................................................................................................................5 DEFINITIONS ..............................................................................................................................................................7 REGULATIONS .........................................................................................................................................................11 THE AIRPORT OPERATING AREA
    [Show full text]
  • Membership List April 2021
    Membership List April 2021 Albuquerque International Sunport (ABQ) Fairbanks Int’l. Airport (FAI) Allegheny County Airport Authority (PIT) Fresno Yosemite International Airport (FAT) Austin-Bergstrom Int’l. Airport (AUS) AvPorts-Westchester County Airport (HPN) George Bush Intercontinental Airport (IAH) Greater Asheville Regional Airport Auth. (AVL) Bangor International Airport (BGR) Greater Orlando Aviation Authority (MCO) Barnstable Municipal Airport (HYA) Greater Rockford Airport Authority (RFD) Bishop International Airport Authority (FNT) Greenville/Spartanburg Int’l. Airport (GSP) Blue Grass Airport (LEX) Gulfport-Biloxi International Airport (GPT) Boise Airport (BOI) Broward County Aviation Dept. (FLL) Hagerstown Regional Airport (HGR) Buffalo Niagara Int’l. Airport (BUF) Hartsfield-Atlanta International Airport (ATL) Houston Airport System (EFD, HOU, IAH) Calgary Airport Authority (YYC) Huntsville-Madison Cnty. Airport Auth. (HSV) Charles M. Shulz-Sonoma County Airport (STS) Chattanooga Metropolitan Airport Auth. (CHA) Islip MacArthur Airport (ISP) Chicago Rockford Int’l. Airport (RFD) Cincinnati/No. Kentucky Int’l. Airport (CVG) Jackson Hole Airport Board (JAC) City of Chicago Aeronautics Dept. (ORD) Jackson Municipal Airport Authority (JAN) City of Dallas, Dallas Love Field (DAL) Jacksonville Aviation Authority (JAX) City of Redding Airports Division (RDD) John Wayne Airport—Orange County (SNA) Cleveland Hopkins Int’l. Airport (CLE) Colorado Springs Airport (COS) Kansas City International Airport (MCI) Columbus Regional Airport
    [Show full text]
  • 2003 Airport Rail Link Study
    AIRPORT RAIL LINK STUDY SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Executive Summary Consultant Deliverable 9.1 Supplement Prepared for: Research Triangle Regional Public Transit Authority (Triangle Transit Authority) P.O. Box 13787 Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709 And Raleigh Durham Airport Authority P.O. Box 80001 RDU Airport, North Carolina 27623 Prepared by: Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan 200 East Woodlawn Road, Suite 310 Charlotte, North Carolina 28217 May 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS ES1. Introduction.................................................................................................................. 1 ES2. Study ObjectiVes ......................................................................................................... 1 ES3. Definition of AlternatiVes.............................................................................................. 3 ES4. EValuation of AlternatiVes............................................................................................ 4 ES5. Findings and Conclusions ......................................................................................... 10 LIST OF TABLES ES-1 ObjectiVes and Measures of EffectiVeness ................................................................. 3 ES-2 Technology AlternatiVes ............................................................................................. 5 ES-3 Summary of EValuated AlternatiVes ........................................................................... 6 ES-4 Summary of AlternatiVes EValuation .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Global Airline Alliances As a Strategy for International Network Development by Antonio Tugores-García
    Analysis of Global Airline Alliances as a Strategy for International Network Development by Antonio Tugores-García M.S., Civil Engineering, Enginyer de Camins, Canals i Ports Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 2008 Submitted to the MIT Engineering Systems Division and the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degrees of Master of Science in Technology and Policy and Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 2012 © 2012 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All rights reserved Signature of Author__________________________________________________________________________________ Antonio Tugores-García Department of Engineering Systems Division Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics May 14, 2012 Certified by___________________________________________________________________________________________ Peter P. Belobaba Principal Research Scientist, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Thesis Supervisor Accepted by__________________________________________________________________________________________ Joel P. Clark Professor of Material Systems and Engineering Systems Acting Director, Technology and Policy Program Accepted by___________________________________________________________________________________________ Eytan H. Modiano Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Chair, Graduate Program Committee 1 2 Analysis of Global Airline Alliances as a Strategy for International Network Development by Antonio Tugores-García
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Occurrence Report Rejected Take-Off/Runway
    Transportation Safety Board Bureau de la sécurité des transports of Canada du Canada AVIATION OCCURRENCE REPORT REJECTED TAKE-OFF/RUNWAY OVERRUN CANADIAN AIRLINES INTERNATIONAL MCDONNELL DOUGLAS DC-10-30ER C-GCPF VANCOUVER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, BRITISH COLUMBIA 19 OCTOBER 1995 REPORT NUMBER A95H0015 MANDATE OF THE TSB The Canadian Transportation Accident Investigation and Safety Board Act provides the legal framework governing the TSB's activities. The TSB has a mandate to advance safety in the marine, pipeline, rail, and aviation modes of transportation by: ! conducting independent investigations and, if necessary, public inquiries into transportation occurrences in order to make findings as to their causes and contributing factors; ! reporting publicly on its investigations and public inquiries and on the related findings; ! identifying safety deficiencies as evidenced by transportation occurrences; ! making recommendations designed to eliminate or reduce any such safety deficiencies; and ! conducting special studies and special investigations on transportation safety matters. It is not the function of the Board to assign fault or determine civil or criminal liability. INDEPENDENCE To encourage public confidence in transportation accident investigation, the investigating agency must be, and be seen to be, objective, independent and free from any conflicts of interest. The key feature of the TSB is its independence. It reports to Parliament through the President of the Queen`s Privy Council for Canada and is separate from other government agencies and departments. Its independence enables it to be fully objective in arriving at its conclusions and recommendations. Its continuing independence rests on its competence, openness, and integrity, together with the fairness of its processes. Visit the TSB site.
    [Show full text]