The Decade of the Cannabis Club by Dale Gieringer, Phd Nothing Has Done More to Advance Bers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Decade of the Cannabis Club by Dale Gieringer, Phd Nothing Has Done More to Advance Bers —24— O’Shaughnessy’s • Winter/Spring 2007 The Decade of the Cannabis Club By Dale Gieringer, PhD Nothing has done more to advance bers. He denounced Peron for serving as the federal govern- the availability of medical marijuana non-medical users and ignoring standard ment dug in its heels than the advent of so-called “cannabis procedures for non-profit organizations. and fought to frustrate buyers’ clubs.” While state medical “The only ‘haphazard... for profit’ buy- any move to legiti- marijuana laws like California’s Prop ers’ club in the state is the high-flying mize medical mari- 215 have relieved the legal jeopardy of Market Street circus,” Imler wrote to the juana. On December medical cannabis users, they have not San Francisco Chronicle. 30, 1996, Drug Czar created a legal distribution system to Barry Mc-Caffrey actually deliver the medicine. The 1996 Generation joined Attorney Gen- The first true distribution system The Oakland Cannabis Buyers’ Co- eral Janet Reno and arose when Dennis Peron established operative was originally started as a de- HHS Secretary Donna the San Francisco Cannabis Buyers livery service by Jeff Jones, Matt Quirk Shalala in denouncing Club in the summer of 1993. Modeled and Andrew Glazier. In March, 1996, Prop. 215 as contrary loosely on Amsterdam’s coffee houses, the Oakland City Council approved a to federal law. Given Line outside S.F. Cannabis Buyers Club when it reopened the club sold marijuana to anyone with resolution endorsing medical marijuana, the prospect of federal in January, 1997, reflects pent-up demand by medical cannabis users. It had been closed since an Aug. 4 raid by a doctor’s note showing medical need. and in particular commending the ac- opposition, state legis- It claimed legitimacy based on a popular tivities of the OCBC. On July 4, the state narcotics agents. The Oakland Cannabis Buyers Co- lators were reluctant to operative and new clubs in the city stepped into the breach. initiative passed by city voters in 1991 OCBC formally opened to the public in attempt to create a legal — “Proposition P”— that instructed an upper-floor office at 1755 Broadway. distribution system. picture of its indoor garden. The message local law enforcement to not arrest and Under the leadership of clean-cut Jeff McCaffrey and Reno threatened to became clear that clubs were at risk if prosecute medical mariuana users. Jones, the OCBC continued to make a penalize doctors who recommended they had gardens onsite. The result was The SFCBC launched a movement. favorable impression on public officials. marijuana by suspending their fed- to force gardens underground and keep In 1992, Santa Cruz became the second In addition to providing cannabis, the eral prescription-writing licenses. This prices at black-market levels. county to approve a medical marijuana OCBC issued photo ID cards so that would have been a terrible blow to Prop With few exceptions, clubs had to initiative, Measure A. Activists had members didn’t have to carry their doc- 215 had it not been for a lawsuit by rely on a network of underground grow- rallied around Valerie Corral, who suc- tors’ letter of approval on their person. Marcus Conant, MD, and co-plaintiffs ers, some with small gardens or co-ops, cessfully battled criminal charges for (OCBC staff would phone the doctor’s (including Valerie Corral) which won a others with industrial warehouses. Thus cultivating marijuana to control her office to confirm the applicant’s status federal injunction protecting the right of an enduring illegal taint was left on the severe epilepsy. In the Spring of 1993 as a patient.) In time the OCBC cards doctors and patients to discuss marijuana medical marijuana market. Corral and her husband, Mike, expanded came to be accepted by Oakland police, as a treatment option. Proponents continued to explore their home garden, located on remote as well as by many other cannabis clubs In the heady days immediately after ways of providing medical marijuana le- property in the Santa Cruz mountains, lacking the resources to develop their the election, many activists sought to fol- gally within the strictures of federal law. to provide for a growing circle of own ID system low Den-nis’s example. Some who did However, all such efforts were doomed mostly terminally ill people. The Corrals In August 1996, California Bureau of so were surprised to find that local law by the DEA’s refusal to issue the required organized the Wo/Men’s Alliance for Narcotics agents raided the San Fran- enforcement was not as tolerant as in San permits under the Controlled Substances Medical Marijuana (WAMM), the first cisco CBC, taking cash, marijuana, and Francisco. Scores of growers were ar- Act. The DEA turned down permit medical marijuana cultivation collective records on more than 11,000 members rested for marijuana cultivation that they applications from Robert Schmidt, in California. Members would take —while carefully leaving the campaign mistakenly believed to be legal because proprietor of the Genesis 1:29 club in turns tending the crop or doing other office intact. it was for medical use by others. Zealous Petaluma, and Johann Stahl, a prospec- chores, in return for which they received prosecutors could short-circuit any hope tive hemp farmer in Mendocino. a share of the medicine. In a pattern that would be of a Prop 215 defense by turning a case An alternative to DEA-licensed WAMM eschewed buying or selling repeated, the raid did not put over to their federal counterparts. grows was proposed by San Mateo marijuana, thereby avoiding the taint In Placer County, Bill and Peggy Rid- Supervisor Mike Nevin, who suggested of the illicit market. It served only the an end to cannabis clubs, but dick, both in their 60s, were convicted having the county hospital distribute most seriously ill patients. It attended to rather caused their profusion on federal charges after claiming that marijuana that had been confiscated by the health and welfare of its members elsewhere. the several hundred plants they were the police. This alternative was rejected through social, medical and spiritual growing were for Peron’s club; they due to the irregular quality and doubtful services. were sentenced to 30 months in prison. purity of illicit cannabis. In January 1995, Scott Imler, an ac- In a pattern that would be repeated, the raid did not put an end to cannabis B.E. Smith became another Prop 215 In 2002, San Francisco voters ap- clubs, but rather caused their profu- martyr after announcing his intent to proved Proposition S, calling on the sion elsewhere. For a couple of weeks, the Trinity County Board of Supervisors city to investigate ways of establishing the Metropolitan Community Church to grow a field of medical marijuana. a legal distribution system. After much stepped in to allow emergency distribu- Smith, an outspoken Vietnam vet, was discussion, a Prop S task force failed to tion to AIDS patients. Peron’s old space arrested on federal charges and sen- find a practicable solution. at 194 Church St. was resurrected by Vic tenced to a maximum sentence of 27 Although it did not legalize distribu- Hernandez, who opened a new dispen- months by Judge Garland Burrell, who tion, Prop 215 did offer two possible sary known as CHAMP (Californians found him “beyond rehabilitation.” legal defenses for medical cannabis Helping Alleviate Medical Problems). Another victim of the federal jug- providers. First, insofar as it allowed A club in the Mission district, Flower gernaut was Bryan Epis, who along patients and caregivers to grow, it Valerie Corral of WAMM and Assembly- Therapy, was launched by John Hudson, with David Kasakove hoped to follow presumably allowed them to grow to- man John Vasconcellos at the first meeting Leslie Thomas, Beth Moore and others Peron’s example by starting a patient gether collectively. This was essentially of a task force that drafted legislation to who had worked closely with Peron. co-op garden in Chico. Epis was ar- the WAMM model. It was difficult to “clarify” Prop 215. The group’s draft, In Marin, Lynnette Shaw established rested on federal charges and sentenced implement in practice, however and revised by law enforcement lobbyists, the Marin Alliance for Medical Mari- to 10 years in prison for conspiracy to could only serve a limited number of became Senate Bill 420. juana in a comfortable, out-of-the-way grow more than 1,000 plants. Like other patients (WAMM has never exceeded federal arrestees, Epis was forbidden to 300 members). tivist who had been associated with both office in the town of Fairfax. mention medical marijuana at his trial. San Diego activist Steve McWilliams Dennis Peron and the Corrals, opened The specter of federal arrest would con- tried to emulate WAMM by establishing the Santa Cruz Cannabis Buyers’ Club. Ramifications of Prop 215 tinue to haunt medical cannabis growers, a cultivation collective known as Shelter Like the SFCBC, it sold marijuana from The new law created by Prop 215 providers and users up to the present day. from the Storm, first in Valley Center, clandestine growers to patients who explicitly protected doctors and their A group of activists committed to and then in San Diego. He was arrested could show medical need. patients, but it provided at best vague “working within the system” held a strat- three times by local police. Imler soon moved on to Los Angeles and tenuous moral protection for those egy session in Santa Cruz in October, A second alternative for providers to work for the Prop. 215 campaign. In who grew and distributed cannabis. 1997 The group included Scott Imler was to claim that they were “primary October ‘95, with backing from Peron, Specifically, it authorized possession and Jeff Jones, Valerie Corral, and Lynnette caregivers” for their customers.
Recommended publications
  • Legalizing Marijuana and Abating Environmental Harm: an Overblown Promise?
    Legalizing Marijuana and Abating Environmental Harm: An Overblown Promise? Michael Vitiello* Written in advance of the passage of Proposition 64 (legalizing recreational use of marijuana in California), this article explores why legalization of marijuana is now quite likely. It also identifies arguments made by proponents in support of legalization, including the need to abate environmental harm caused by illegal production of marijuana in pristine areas and elsewhere where marijuana has become a major cash crop. Specifically, the article examines the report produced by The Blue Ribbon Commission organized by Lieutenant Governor Gavin Newsom and Proposition 64’s provisions addressing environmental concerns. It questions whether Proposition can deliver on the promise to abate the environmental harm caused by marijuana production. In closing, the article focuses on one source for optimism, an increasing number of young marijuana producers interested in cooperation with state actors to comply with the law, especially with environmental regulations. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 775 I. THE STEADY MARCH TOWARDS LEGALIZATION ......................... 777 II. THE ENVIRONMENTAL COST ..................................................... 791 III. PROMISING A POT OF GOLD? .................................................... 796 A. Reducing the Illegal Trade ................................................. 803 * Copyright © 2016 Michael Vitiello. Distinguished Professor of Law, the University of the Pacific McGeorge School of Law; University of Pennsylvania, J.D., 1974; Swarthmore College, B.A., 1969. I want to extend special thanks to Rosemary Deck for her capable research assistance. I also want to thank my several colleagues who gave me extensive feedback on an earlier draft of the article, including Associate Dean for Scholarship Raquel Aldana and Professors Karrigan Börk, Frank Gevurtz, Jennifer Harder, John Kirlin, Leslie Jacobs, Brian Landsberg, Emily Parento, and John Sprankling.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of California Municipal Marijuana Business Taxation
    Marijuana Business Taxation Adoption In California Review of California Municipal Marijuana Business Taxation: Background, Case Studies, and Strategies for Adoption Jordan Harrison Kevin Miller Adam Patterson Evan Xu San Francisco State University Master in Public Administration PA715 Spring 2017 Dr. Sheldon Gen May 23, 2017 1 Marijuana Business Taxation Adoption In California ABSTRACT Proposition 64 – the Control, Tax and Regulate Adult Use of Marijuana Act (AUMA) – took effect on November 9, 2016. The Act included the following main elements: ● Decriminalized recreational (non-medical) use for persons over 21 ● Decriminalized personal cultivation of up to six plants ● Reduced state penalties for marijuana-related crimes ● Established state system for licensing and taxation of marijuana businesses ● Allowed local regulation, prohibition, and taxation of marijuana businesses The Medical Cannabis Safety and Regulation Act (MCSRA) established the Bureau of Medical Cannabis Regulation to license and regulate marijuana businesses under the MCSRA. With Proposition 64, this new bureau was renamed the Bureau of Marijuana Control (Bureau) and will license both medical and recreational marijuana businesses starting January 1, 2018 (Bureau of Marijuana Control [BOMC], 2017b). Both acts defer land use authority to local agencies regarding if and where to allow marijuana businesses. In addition to setting state excises tax rates, the AUMA grants cities the ability to establish local excise taxes on marijuana businesses and exempts medical marijuana from the state and local general sales tax that applies to most goods and services. This paper will provide a brief summary of the regulation of recreational marijuana under the AUMA, medical marijuana under MCSRA, and an explanation of the new state excise taxes on both medical and recreational marijuana created with Proposition 64.
    [Show full text]
  • Gangs Beyond Borders
    Gangs Beyond Borders California and the Fight Against Transnational Organized Crime March 2014 Kamala D. Harris California Attorney General Gangs Beyond Borders California and the Fight Against Transnational Organized Crime March 2014 Kamala D. Harris California Attorney General Message from the Attorney General California is a leader for international commerce. In close proximity to Latin America and Canada, we are a state laced with large ports and a vast interstate system. California is also leading the way in economic development and job creation. And the Golden State is home to the digital and innovation economies reshaping how the world does business. But these same features that benefit California also make the state a coveted place of operation for transnational criminal organizations. As an international hub, more narcotics, weapons and humans are trafficked in and out of California than any other state. The size and strength of California’s economy make our businesses, financial institutions and communities lucrative targets for transnational criminal activity. Finally, transnational criminal organizations are relying increasingly on cybercrime as a source of funds – which means they are frequently targeting, and illicitly using, the digital tools and content developed in our state. The term “transnational organized crime” refers to a range of criminal activity perpetrated by groups whose origins often lie outside of the United States but whose operations cross international borders. Whether it is a drug cartel originating from Mexico or a cybercrime group out of Eastern Europe, the operations of transnational criminal organizations threaten the safety, health and economic wellbeing of all Americans, and particularly Californians.
    [Show full text]
  • Up in Smoke: Removing Marijuana from Schedule I
    UP IN SMOKE (DO NOT DELETE) 4/9/2018 12:38 PM UP IN SMOKE: REMOVING MARIJUANA FROM SCHEDULE I DAVID R. KATNER* I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 167 II. DESCRIPTION OF MARIJUANA AND PUBLIC OPINION .......................... 170 III. HISTORY OF MARIJUANA USES AND LAWS IN THE U.S. AND ABROAD ......................................................................................... 174 IV. CREATION OF SCHEDULES OF DRUGS ................................................ 177 V. EVOLUTION OF MEDICINAL APPLICATIONS OF MARIJUANA ............... 178 VI. ADDICTIVE? ........................................................................................ 181 VII. DISSEMINATED PROPAGANDA ABOUT MARIJUANA, AND LEGAL ARBITRARINESS .............................................................................. 184 VIII. RESCHEDULING MARIJUANA TO SCHEDULE II ................................ 190 IX. REMOVING MARIJUANA ALTOGETHER FROM FEDERAL REGULATION .................................................................................. 195 X. CONCLUSION........................................................................................ 202 I. INTRODUCTION Billions of dollars are spent each year arresting, prosecuting, and incarcerating Americans convicted of possession of cannabis or marijuana.1 During the 1970’s, annual marijuana arrests ranged between 420,000 and 500,000 people each year.2 By 1995, there were roughly 600,000 marijuana arrests nationwide, with more Americans being imprisoned
    [Show full text]
  • Dispensary Selection Information
    ______________________________________________________________________________________ State of Vermont Department of Public Safety Marijuana Registry [phone] 802-241-5115 45 State Drive [fax] 802-241-5230 Waterbury, Vermont 05671-1300 [email] [email protected] www.medicalmarijuana.vermont.gov Dispensary Selection Information IMPORTANT INFORMATION CONTAINED BELOW WHEN COMPLETING THE FORMS TO REGISTER AS A PATIENT WITH THE VERMONT MARIJUANA REGISTRY (VMR). Materials provided by each dispensary are attached to assist patient applicants designating a dispensary. Registered patients may purchase marijuana, marijuana infused products, seeds, and clones from a registered dispensary. Registered patients who designate a dispensary may purchase marijuana products and cultivate marijuana in a single secure indoor facility. Registered patients who elect to cultivate marijuana in a single secure indoor facility must provide the address and location to the VMR on his or her application. Any updates to the address and/or location of the single secure indoor facility must be submitted in writing via email or mail to the contact information below. Registered patients may only purchase marijuana, marijuana infused products, seeds, and clones from one dispensary and must designate the dispensary of his or her choice on their application. Registered patients may only change dispensaries every 30 days. After 30 days, a registered patient may change his or her designated dispensary by submitting a completed Cardholder Information Notification form and a $25 processing fee. The VMR will issue the registered patient a new registry identification card with a new registry identification number. ALL registered patients and caregivers MUST schedule appointments prior to going to their designated dispensary to obtain marijuana, this includes seed and clones.
    [Show full text]
  • Big-Catalogue-English-2020.Pdf
    PAS CH SIO UT N D ® CATALOGUE English SEED COMPANY Feminized, autoflower and regular cannabis seeds AMSTERDAM, ESTABLISHED 1987 for recreational and medical use. Amsterdam - Maastricht YOUR PASSION OUR PASSION DUTCH PASSION 02 Contents Welcome to Dutch Passion Welcome to Dutch Passion 02 Dutch Passion was the second Cannabis Seed Company in the world, established in Amsterdam in 1987. It is our mission to supply Bestsellers 2019 02 the recreational and medical home grower with the highest quality cannabis products available in all countries where this is legally Regular, Feminized and Autoflower 03 allowed. Cannabinoids 03 Medical use of cannabis 03 After many years of dedication Dutch Passion remains a leading supplier of the world’s best cannabis genetics. Our experienced Super Sativa Seed Club 04 team do their utmost to maintain the quality of our existing varieties and constantly search for new ones from an extensive network Special Cannabinoids / THC-Victory 05 of worldwide sources. We supply thousands of retailers and seed distributors around the world. Dutch Outdoor 06 High Altitude 09 CBD Rich 10 Dutch Passion have never been afraid to upset conventional thinking; we invented feminized seeds in the 1990’s and more recently Latin America 13 have pioneered the introduction of 10-week Autoflower seeds which have helped make life even easier for the self-sufficient Classics 14 cannabis grower. CBD-rich medical cannabis genetics is a new area that we are proud to be leading. Skunk Family 19 Orange Family 21 The foundation of our success is the genetic control we have over our strains and the constant influx of new genetics that we obtain Blue Family 24 worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Addressing the Legal Cannabis Industry's Carbon Footprint
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Master's Projects Master's Theses and Graduate Research Spring 5-2020 Sustainable Cannabis Policy in California: Addressing the Legal Cannabis Industry’s Carbon Footprint Genevieve Yip San Jose State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_projects Part of the Energy Policy Commons, Environmental Policy Commons, Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation Commons, and the Public Administration Commons Recommended Citation Yip, Genevieve, "Sustainable Cannabis Policy in California: Addressing the Legal Cannabis Industry’s Carbon Footprint" (2020). Master's Projects. 946. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31979/etd.eagx-enx5 https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_projects/946 This Master's Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Master's Theses and Graduate Research at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Projects by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sustainable Cannabis Policy in California: Addressing the Legal Cannabis Industry’s Carbon Footprint by Genevieve Yip A Thesis Quality Research Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Masters Degree in PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Professor Frances L. Edwards, Ph.D. Advisor The Graduate School San Jose State University May 2020 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ 1 LIST
    [Show full text]
  • Sunn Hemp Shines in New England
    Sunn Hemp Shines in Massachusetts Sam Corcoran & Masoud Hashemi Foreground: Testing out sunn hemp as mulch and fertilizer for garlic, fall 2017; Background: a field of flowering sunn hemp before winterkill, early November. Sunn hemp is a new, summer crop for us in the Northeast. Despite its name, Sunn hemp (Crotalaria juncea) is not related to the industrial hemp you may be familiar with (Cannabis sativa). The Sunn Hemp plant bears only a mild resemblance to Cannabis, and is actually a legume in the same family as peas and beans. As a legume, Sunn Hemp has a relationship with bacteria that convert atmospheric nitrogen into plant-available nitrogen. It is believed that this tropical crop has been grown for hundreds of years, and it remains popular in India, Bangladesh, and Brazil. Sunn Hemp can be used for for- age, fiber, or as a green manure to provide nitrogen to subsequently planted crops. Modern interest in Sunn Hemp in the U.S. surged in Hawaii in the 80’s. Research spread across the southern U.S. in the 90’s through present, with Mid-Atlantic States also taking a recent research inter- est. Within just the past 2-3 years, a few seed companies have start- ed readily supplying Sunn Hemp throughout the U.S. Four years ago, we tried planting this crop at the UMass Research Farm and discovered we can grow Sunn Hemp, too. Despite our cooler climate, the hot summers in Massachusetts are sufficient for this tropical crop; in the 2016 drought, Sunn Hemp remained high performing while other crops suffered.
    [Show full text]
  • Considering Marijuana Legalization
    Research Report Considering Marijuana Legalization Insights for Vermont and Other Jurisdictions Jonathan P. Caulkins, Beau Kilmer, Mark A. R. Kleiman, Robert J. MacCoun, Gregory Midgette, Pat Oglesby, Rosalie Liccardo Pacula, Peter H. Reuter C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/rr864 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2015 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.html. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface Marijuana legalization is a controversial and multifaceted issue that is now the subject of seri- ous debate. In May 2014, Governor Peter Shumlin signed Act 155 (S.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Hemp Legalization on Safety Oversight of Cmv Drivers Office of Drug and Alcohol Policy and Compliance (Odapc)
    IMPACT OF HEMP LEGALIZATION ON SAFETY OVERSIGHT OF CMV DRIVERS OFFICE OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL POLICY AND COMPLIANCE (ODAPC) • Author and guardian of 49 CFR Part 40, throughout the Department: • Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) • Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) • Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) • Federal Transit Administration (FTA) • Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), as well as for the • US Coast Guard (USCG) • ODAPC provides intermodal coordination and ensures a ONE-DOT approach to regulatory, policy, and compliance matters. 2 DOT DRUG TESTING • Drug tests detect recent drug use - NOT impairment. • No impairment standard for drug levels like alcohol levels. • Windows of detection for each drug varies, but marijuana may be detected for up to 30 days based on the employee’s use and physical build. • DOT tests for: • Marijuana (THC) • Opioids (OPI) • Cocaine (COC) • Codeine • Amphetamines (AMP) • Morphine • Amphetamine • 6-AM (heroin) • Methamphetamine • Hydrocodone • MDMA • Hydromorphone • MDA • Oxycodone • Oxymorphone • Phencyclidine (PCP) 3 HEMP AS DEFINED BY THE 2018 FARM BILL Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 [amended to include] Subtitle G— Hemp Production SEC. 297A. [7 U.S.C. 1639o] DEFINITIONS. (1) HEMP.—The term ‘‘hemp’’ means the plant Cannabis sativa L. and any part of that plant, including the seeds thereof and all derivatives, extracts, cannabinoids, isomers, acids, salts, and salts of isomers, whether growing or not, with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis. cannabinoids = THC (Δ9-THC, Δ8-THC), CBD, CBV, CBN, CBC, CBG, CBL…. 4 HEMP VS MARIJUANA Hemp Marijuana • Cannabis sativa L. species • Cannabis sativa L.
    [Show full text]
  • 15/Gram - $50/3.5 Grams Select Flower - $13/Gram** STRAIN DESCRIPTIONS
    30 Mozzone Boulevard, Taunton, MA 02780 http://commonwealthaltcare.org/ (508) 738-6380 Flower Menu - $15/gram - $50/3.5 Grams Select Flower - $13/gram** STRAIN DESCRIPTIONS Strain Lineage Type Available In TAC Effects and Aroma Mendo Purps x Sativa 1.0 G THCA 13.1 Hashy with savory undertones. Great body high, very happy and Triangle Kush #4 x Hybrid CBGA .4 Item 9** Stardawg Haze comforting Hybrid 1.0 G THCA 10.5 A hybrid strain, perfect for pain, relaxation, inflammation, and stress CBC .6 Echo** relief Gorilla Glue #4 x Sativa 1.0 G THCA 20.8 A sweet mandarin orange aroma with woody undertones. Great for Tangie Hybrid CBGA .8 Citrus Sap mood elevation, stress, inflammation, and pain relief Blue Dream x Hybrid 1.0 G THCA 21.4 Blueberry aroma with spice and sweet herbal notes. Effects are Snow Lotus CBGA .3 uplifting and promote relaxation and focus. Great for stress, pain, Dream Lotus inflammation, and spasticity White Widow x Hybrid 1.0 G THCA 17.2 A nutty, coffee aroma with earthy undertones. Heavily relaxing Skywalker CBGA .6 effects, boosting both mood and appetite. Great for stress relief and White Walker Kush treating anorexia and cachexia Moonshine Haze x Hybrid 1.0 G THCA 21.5 Spicy, sweet, and fruit aromas. A balanced hybrid that’s both Double Purple CBGA 1.1 Moonrise Doja energetic and relaxing Afghani x Thai x Indica 1.0 G THCA 23.2 Strong indica strain that emanates sweet blueberry aromas. Heavy Purple Thai CBGA .5 3.5 G relaxation effects, paired with a euphoric sensation.
    [Show full text]
  • Activists' Cases Riding on Raich and Booker
    —22— O’Shaughnessy’s • Spring 2005 Activists’ Cases Riding on Raich and Booker By Ann Harrison The U.S. Supreme Court decision in Ashcroft v. Raich will have far-ranging consequences for medical cannabis pa- tients, caregivers, growers and dispen- sary operators fighting federal marijuana charges. Directly at stake are the homes, the businesses and the freedom of at least 30 defendants. Their cases were put on hold following a December 2003 ruling by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals entitling Diane Monson and Angel Raich and her caregivers to use and cultivate marijuana under California law. The 9th Circuit injunction —which the Bush Administration challenged in Bryan Epis with daughter Ashley (above) after his release from month sentence before being allowed out on bail. While Epis was the U.S. Supreme Court— applies in the federal penitentiary at Lompoc in August 2004, pending the incarcerated, supporters publicized his plight on billboards in Cali- eight western states that have medical outcome of the Raich case. Epis had served 30 months of a 53- fornia. marijuana laws. The injunction has had an indirect The Blakely and Booker decisions sated for ninety-five percent of his grow, nabis Buyers Club. The three cases have effect, too, according to Attorney Omar could change the lives of 64,000 people and did not receive payment for the re- been bundled together as a single case, Figueroa, who says he is seeing differ- sentenced in federal court each year. maining five percent. All of the medical but they have different implications for ent enforcement practices in federal Ninety-seven percent of federal defen- cannabis that he grew was used inside the dispensaries involved.
    [Show full text]