Environmental Philosophy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Anthropocentric - Ecocentric Controversy: Finding a Common Ground
ANTHROPOCENTRIC - ECOCENTRIC CONTROVERSY: FINDING A COMMON GROUND FREDRICK MUNINI MUSEE (B.A.Phil) C50/14540/2009 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS (PHILOSOPHY) IN THE SCHOOL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES OF KENYATTA UNIVERSITY SEPTEMBER 2017 ii DECLARATION This thesis is my original work and has not been presented for a degree in any other university. Signature_________________________ Date____________________ Fredrick Munini Musee, (B.A. Philosophy) Reg. No. C50/14540/2009 This thesis has been submitted with our approval as University supervisors. 1. __________________________ Date__________________ Dr. Kibaba Makokha Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies Kenyatta University 2. __________________________ Date__________________ Dr. Thomas Namwambah Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies Kenyatta University iii DEDICATION I dedicate this work to my beloved wife Loise Vaati and to my sons Benedict Mumo and Reinhard Mshindi.Their love, concern and encouragement gave me the impetus to continue with the study. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The completion of this study would not have been possible without the assistance and cooperation of many people to whom I am indebted. I am particularly grateful to Dr. Kibaba Makokha and Dr. Thomas Namwambah who directed this study as my supervisors. Their honest and insightful guidance, as well as their patience and encouragement, were a major drive throughout this research. Clarity of their criticism enhanced conceptualization of my ideas. I wish to extend my sincere appreciation and gratitude to Dr. Josephat Oyigo for his genuine concern, mentorship and encouragement at the moments of difficulties. This kept my vision alive and made it possible for me to struggle with the strenuous task of completing this work. -
Deep Ecology
A sample entry from the Encyclopedia of Religion and Nature (London & New York: Continuum, 2005) Edited by Bron Taylor © 2005 All Rights Reserved 456 Deep Ecology Taylor, Bron. “Resacralizing Earth: Pagan Environmental- pocentrism (human-centeredness), which values nature ism and the Restoration of Turtle Island.” In American exclusively in terms of its usefulness to humans. Anthro- Sacred Space. David Chidester and Edward. T. pocentrism, in turn, is viewed as grounded in Western Linenthal, eds. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, religion and philosophy, which many deep ecologists 1995, 97–151. believe must be rejected (or a deep ecological transform- See also: Abbey, Edward; Black Mesa; Church of ation of consciousness within them must occur) if humans Euthanasia; Earth First! and the Earth Liberation Front; are to learn to live sustainably on the Earth. Green Death Movement; Jeffers, John Robinson; Radical Thus, many deep ecologists believe that only by Environmentalism. “resacralizing” our perceptions of the natural world can we put ecosystems above narrow human interests and learn to live harmoniously with the natural world, thereby Deep Ecology averting ecological catastrophe. It is a common perception within the deep ecology movement that the religions of Norwegian philosopher Arne Naess (b. 1912) coined the indigenous cultures, the world’s remnant and newly term “Deep Ecology” in 1972 to express the idea that revitalized or invented pagan religions, and religions nature has intrinsic value, namely, value apart from its originating in Asia (especially Daoism, Buddhism, and usefulness to human beings, and that all life forms should Hinduism) provide superior grounds for ecological ethics, be allowed to flourish and fulfill their evolutionary des- and greater ecological wisdom, than do Occidental tinies. -
Downloaded from Brill.Com10/01/2021 06:42:26AM Via Free Access L
PART ONE SETTING THE SCENE L. Hajjar Leib - 9789004189935 Downloaded from Brill.com10/01/2021 06:42:26AM via free access L. Hajjar Leib - 9789004189935 Downloaded from Brill.com10/01/2021 06:42:26AM via free access CHAPTER ONE HISTORICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL UNDERPINNINGS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MOVEMENT Introduction In order to examine the subject of environmental human rights, it is necessary to locate it in its historical and philosophical contexts. A relevant environmen- tal philosophy is a prerequisite for understanding our ecological problems and their potential solutions. Environmental philosophy was brought to promi- nence with the debate about the relationship between humans and nature and the possibility of extending the domain of ethics and rights to non-human beings or to nature as a whole.1 As Lynn White Jr., an American historian, said, “what people do about their ecology depends on what they think about themselves in relation to things around them.”2 Th is chapter consists of three sections. Section A explores the roots of our ecological crisis as depicted by philosophers and environmental writers. Section B sheds light on the emergence and development of environmental- ism. By drawing upon the history of environmentalism and the development in environmental philosophy, Section C provides an overview of the ethical facets and philosophical trends of environmentalism. A. Roots of the Environmental Crisis Th e term ‘environment’ is derived from the French verb environner, meaning to surround or encircle. Th us, in an ecological and biological context, the envi- ronment can be defi ned as ‘the complex of physical, chemical and biotic fac- tors that surround and act upon an organism or ecosystem.’3 Th is meaning implies that the environment is peripheral to the organisms or people that live within it.4 Th e term ‘ecosphere’ provides a more precise and substantial substi- tute for the term ‘environment’.