DOCSLIB.ORG

Kentish Mountain Bike Trails MASTER PLAN

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kentish Mountain Bike Trails MASTER PLAN Kentish Mountain Bike Trails MASTER PLAN June 2015 The Kentish Mountain Bike Trails Master Plan was prepared by TRC Tourism and World Trails for Kentish Council. Date Prepared: June 2015 Disclaimer The information and recommendations provided in this report are made on the basis of information available at the time of preparation. While all care has been taken to check and validate material presented in this report, independent research should be undertaken before any action or decision is taken on the basis of material contained in this report. This report does not seek to provide any assurance of project viability and TRC Tourism and World Trails accept no liability for decisions made or the information provided in the report. PO Box 837 P (61) 02 6456 2722 Jindabyne F (61) 02 6456 2422 www.trctourism.com NSW 2627 E [email protected] Contents 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 The study area ............................................................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Methodology .............................................................................................................................................. 3 1.4 Report Structure ......................................................................................................................................... 3 2 REGIONAL CONTEXT ........................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Overview..................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 The Visitor Economy .................................................................................................................................... 4 3 GROWTH AND TRENDS IN MOUNTAIN BIKING ................................................................................................... 9 3.1 Development of mountain biking ................................................................................................................ 9 4 DEMAND ANALYSIS ...........................................................................................................................................17 4.1 The Australian MTB market ........................................................................................................................17 5 CREATING A MOUNTAIN BIKE DESTINATION .....................................................................................................20 5.1 Characteristics of successful MTB destinations ...........................................................................................20 5.2 The Potential Of The Region .......................................................................................................................21 5.3 What Is The Potential Of The Region To Become A World Class Mountain Bike Destination? .......................23 6 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS ...............................................................................................24 6.1 Zoning and Overlays ...................................................................................................................................24 6.2 Geology and soils .......................................................................................................................................24 6.3 Vegetation .................................................................................................................................................24 6.4 State or nationally significant flora .............................................................................................................25 6.5 State or nationally significant fauna ............................................................................................................25 6.6 Aboriginal Heritage ....................................................................................................................................26 6.7 Weeds........................................................................................................................................................26 6.8 Relevant environmental policy and legislation ............................................................................................26 6.9 Development Implications ..........................................................................................................................27 7 KENTISH TRAILS MASTER PLAN ..........................................................................................................................28 7.1 Vision .........................................................................................................................................................28 7.2 Guiding Principles .......................................................................................................................................28 7.3 Proposed TRAIL Network ............................................................................................................................29 7.4 Trailhead Locations And Infrastructure .......................................................................................................31 7.5 Trailhead Infrastructure..............................................................................................................................33 7.6 Trail Descriptions........................................................................................................................................34 7.7 Trail 1 .........................................................................................................................................................35 7.8 Trail 2 .........................................................................................................................................................37 7.9 Trail 3 .........................................................................................................................................................38 7.10 Trail 4 .........................................................................................................................................................40 7.11 Trail 5 .........................................................................................................................................................42 7.12 Trail 6 .........................................................................................................................................................43 7.13 Trail 7 .........................................................................................................................................................44 7.14 Trail 8 .........................................................................................................................................................47 7.15 Trail 9 .........................................................................................................................................................48 7.16 Trail 10 .......................................................................................................................................................49 7.17 Trail 11 .......................................................................................................................................................51 7.18 Trail 12 .......................................................................................................................................................53 7.19 Trail 13 .......................................................................................................................................................54 7.20 Trail 14 .......................................................................................................................................................56 7.21 Trail 15 .......................................................................................................................................................57 7.22 Trail 16 .......................................................................................................................................................59 Kentish Mountain Bike Trails MASTER PLAN |June 2015| by TRC Tourism i 7.23 Trail 17 .......................................................................................................................................................60 7.24 Trail 18 .......................................................................................................................................................62 7.25 Other Routes and Linkages .........................................................................................................................64 7.26 Construction Cost Estimates .......................................................................................................................70 7.27 Trail Maintenance ......................................................................................................................................74 7.28 Supporting visitor facilities and services ......................................................................................................74
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MEMBERS HANDBOOK 2021 OXONIAN CYCLING CLUB Founded 1927
    MEMBERS HANDBOOK 2021 OXONIAN CYCLING CLUB Founded 1927 Affiliated to: British Cycling Cycling UK Wessex Cyclo-Cross League Contents Foreword Officers Club Website Constitution Regulations and Rules Trophies and awards Award winners 2020 Time trial records, solo Time trial records, tandem Time trial team records Veteran age records Veteran records, by VTTA standards Best all rounder competitions Time trial courses Events programme 2021 Club rides Code of conduct Insurance and personal risk Cyclo-cross Road racing Club kit Notes FOREWORD A warm welcome to another year of Oxonian membership, and an especially warm welcome to new members, and those who joined in 2020 for the truncated TT season (I hope you are continuing your membership!). At the time of writing our activities since March 2020 have been dominated by Covid-19 restrictions and continue to be so. Whilst planning is in place for the 2021 TT season which hopefully will commence in mid-March, nothing is guaranteed in these ever-changing times. We were able to celebrate 2019 successes with the Annual Trophy presentation being held at Freeland Village Hall, with a buffet supper catered by Paul Allday. Regrettably, the continuing uncertainty means we will not be holding a similar event in 2021, and the cancelling of many of our trophy events means that few will be awarded. 2020 TT League Of the completed events where Trophies can be awarded the results are: Tom Pearce Memorial, normally awarded for the (cancelled) Open 10 TT but reassigned to the Club 10 on the Hardwick course on 22nd July, was won by Dan Blake.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Motorized Vehicles in Asia: Lessons for Sustainable Transport Planning and Policy
    Non-Motorized Vehicles in Asia: Lessons for Sustainable Transport Planning and Policy by Michael Replogle Abstract This paper provides an overview of the current use of non-motorized vehicles (NMVs) in Asian cities, the characteristics of NMVs and facilities that serve them, and policies that influence their use. The paper identifies conditions under which NMV use should be encouraged for urban transport, obstacles to the development of NMVs, and identifies desirable steps that might be taken to develop a Non-Motorized Transport Strategy for a city or region, in Asia and other parts of the world. NMVs offer low cost private transport, emit no pollution, use renewable energy, emphasize use of labor rather than capital for mobility, and are well suited for short trips in most cities regardless of income, offering an alternative to motorized transport for many short trips. Thus, they are appropriate elements in strategies dealing with poverty alleviation, air pollution, management of traffic problems and motorization, and the social and economic dimensions of structural adjustment. NMVs have a most important role to play as a complementary mode to public transportation. Cities in Asia exhibit widely varying modal mixes. NMVs -- bicycles, cycle-rickshaws, and carts -- now play a vital role in urban transport in much of Asia. NMVs account for 25 to 80 percent of vehicle trips in many Asian cities, more than anywhere else in the world. Ownership of all vehicles, including NMVs, is growing rapidly throughout Asia as incomes increase. However, the future of NMVs in many Asian cities is threatened by growing motorization, loss of street space for safe NMV use, and changes in urban form prompted by motorization.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxis As Urban Transport
    TØI report 1308/2014 Jørgen Aarhaug Taxis as urban transport TØI Report 1308/2014 Taxis as urban transport Jørgen Aarhaug This report is covered by the terms and conditions specified by the Norwegian Copyright Act. Contents of the report may be used for referencing or as a source of information. Quotations or references must be attributed to the Institute of Transport Economics (TØI) as the source with specific mention made to the author and report number. For other use, advance permission must be provided by TØI. ISSN 0808-1190 ISBN 978-82-480-1511-6 Electronic version Oslo, mars 2014 Title: Taxis as urban transport Tittel: Drosjer som del av bytransporttilbudet Author(s): Jørgen Aarhaug Forfattere: Jørgen Aarhaug Date: 04.2014 Dato: 04.2014 TØI report: 1308/2014 TØI rapport: 1308/2014 Pages 29 Sider 29 ISBN Electronic: 978-82-480-1511-6 ISBN Elektronisk: 978-82-480-1511-6 ISSN 0808-1190 ISSN 0808-1190 Financed by: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Finansieringskilde: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Institute of Transport Economics Transportøkonomisk institutt Project: 3888 - Taxi module Prosjekt: 3888 - Taxi module Quality manager: Frode Longva Kvalitetsansvarlig: Frode Longva Key words: Regulation Emneord: Drosje Taxi Regulering Summary: Sammendrag: Taxis are an instantly recognizable form of transport, existing in Drosjer finnes i alle byer og de er umiddelbart gjenkjennelige. almost every city in the world. Still the roles that are filled by Likevel er det stor variasjon i hva som ligger i begrepet drosje, og taxis varies much from city to city. Regulation of the taxi hvilken rolle drosjene har i det lokale transportsystemet.
    [Show full text]
  • Nannup Cycle Master Plan 2020
    NANNUP CYCLE MASTER PLAN 2020 Nannup Cycle Masterplan 2020 1 NANNUP CYCLE MASTER PLAN 2020 Prepared by Common Ground Trails Pty Ltd for the Shire of Nannup June 2020. This Cycle Master Plan has been sponsored by Nannup Mountain Bike Club, Ride WA and Melo Velo and funded by Lotterywest and the Shire of Nannup. Acknowledgments: Common Ground Trails wishes to acknowledge the significant contributions of the Project Steering Committee including representatives from the Shire of Nannup, the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, the Department of Local Government, Sport and Cultural Industries, Forest Products Commission and Nannup Mountain Bike Club. The authors of the Nannup Cycle Master Plan acknowledge the Traditional Custodians of the land on which we work and live, and recognise their continuing connection to land, water and community. We pay respect to Elders past, present and emerging. Photography: See images for credits. Cover: DIRT event Credit: Marco Noe (@_mnfilm) Disclaimer: Common Ground Trails Pty Ltd, its employees, directors and associated entities shall not be liable for any loss, damage, claim, costs, demands and expenses for any damage or injury of any kind whatsoever and howsoever arriving in connection with the use of this document or in connection with activities undertaken in mountain biking generally. While all due care and consideration has been undertaken in the preparation of this document, Common Ground Trails Pty Ltd advise that all recommendations, actions and information provided in this document is based upon research as referenced in this document. Common Ground Trails Pty Ltd and its employees are not qualified to provide legal, medical or financial advice.
    [Show full text]
  • National Data on Transport Modal Shares for 131 Countries
    Article How Do People Move Around? National Data on Transport Modal Shares for 131 Countries Grigorios Fountas 1, Ya-Yen Sun 2 , Ortzi Akizu-Gardoki 3 and Francesco Pomponi 4,* 1 Transport Research Institute (TRI), School of Engineering & the Built Environment, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh EH10 5DT, UK; [email protected] 2 UQ Business School, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia; [email protected] 3 Faculty of Engineering of Bilbao, University of the Basque Country, 48013 Bilbao, Spain; [email protected] 4 Resource Efficient Built Environment Lab (REBEL), Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh EH10 5DT, UK * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-(0)-13-1455-3590 Received: 19 May 2020; Accepted: 16 June 2020; Published: 18 June 2020 Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic has brought global mobility into the spotlight, with well over 100 countries having instituted either a full or partial lockdown by April 2020. Reduced mobility, whilst causing social and economic impacts, can also be beneficial for the environment and future studies will surely quantify such environmental gains. However, accurate quantification is intimately linked to good quality data on transport modal shares, as passenger cars and public transport have significantly different emissions profiles. Herein, we compile a currently lacking dataset on global modal transport shares for 131 countries. Notably, these are the countries covered by the Google Community Mobility Reports (plus Russia and China for their global relevance), thus allowing for a smooth integration between our dataset and the rich information offered by the Google Community Mobility Reports, thus enabling analysis of global emissions reductions due to mobility restrictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Entire Issue in PDF Format
    AMERICAN RANDONNEUR Volume Seven Issue #3 August 2004 Message From the President ur sport has a lot of French words and phrases, owing to its beginnings there over a hundred years ago. American ran - Odonneurs and randonneuses are familiar with brevets, flèches, contrôles , and the like. If you have read old French cycling magazines, or Audax Club Parisien plaquettes following each Paris-Brest- Paris Randonneurs , one phrase used to be seen a Contents . Page lot— la Petite Reine . Message from the President . 1 The Little Queen? It is a term of affection Welcome New Members . 3 for “Her Majesty”, the bicycle. Americans who RUSA News . 5 have done PBP know firsthand how the French BILL BRYANT The ACP Turns 100! . 6 love their cycling. They line the road and enthu - The Magic of the French Bikes . 8 siastically offer encouragement, assistance, and sustenance to hardy cyclists The Art of the Framebuilder . 11 making their quadrennial pilgrimage to Brest and back, just as they cheer on Permanents News . 14 racing cyclists speeding past, such as during the Tour de France each July. Or 2004 RUSA Event Schedule . 16 Ride Reports . 17 they give a friendly hello to a neighbor cycling by with her family’s fresh bread Super Randonneur Medal Application . 20 for the day, still warm from the baker’s oven. In some areas they eagerly await Randonneur 5000 Medal Application . 21 the day’s mail from a cycling postal worker; others use a bike as their daily RUSA Board Nominations . 22 transportation. These folks know the bicycle is no mere machine.
    [Show full text]
  • Other Kinds of Bikes
    OTHER KINDS OF BIKES SHOPPERS (AKA GRANNY BIKES) These dainty numbers have a step-through frame and tiny wheels, and are usually accessorized with a basket on the front and a little bike box on the back. You almost never see them new any more, but they can be picked up very cheaply secondhand or, just as often, out of a skip. They are fine for pootling around town and are unlikely to get stolen, as they are wholly unattractive to bike thieves. But if you want to upgrade or replace bits, you’ll have a job finding components to fit. STREET BIKES Essentially racing bikes with flat handlebars, allowing a more upright riding position, which is helpful in traffic. They also often have stronger wheels than your classic racer, and are designed to be able to fit mudguards and luggage racks. TOURING BIKES If you know you want a particular sort Built for comfort and strength, tourers are designed to carry a lot of luggage over of bike, e.g. a Dutch bike or a fixed gear long distances. They look like racers, but generally come with pannier rack and model, seek out a shop specializing in mudguards as standard and have sturdier tyres and wheels, should you go off-road, these sorts of machines. as well as a much comfier saddle. Audax bikes are very similar to tourers. They are used for Audax events – long distance rides in which competitors have to cycle to checkpoints by certain times. RECUMBENT BIKES Popular among people with bad backs, recumbent riders sit near the ground in a go-karting sort of position, pounding the pedals with their legs almost horizontal.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.3 Current Situation and Key Issues of the Public Transport Sector in Gkma
    Final Report The Study on Greater Kampala Road Network and Transport Improvement in the Republic of Uganda November 2010 3.3 CURRENT SITUATION AND KEY ISSUES OF THE PUBLIC TRANSPORT SECTOR IN GKMA 3.3.1 OVERVIEW OF THE PUBLIC TRANSPORT The privately owned Uganda Transport Company (UTC) held the exclusive franchise for bus services in Kampala until its nationalization in 1972. At that time, its only competition came from shared taxis which are saloon or estate cars. Following its nationalization, UTC contracted and focused more closely on its long-distance services. As a result, the market for urban transport services in Kampala became open to private sector operators using small minibus vehicles. In 1994 a commercial vehicle distributor established City Link as a private-sector large bus operation with some 40 vehicles in service. However, UTODA was able to organize an effective competition to this initiative. City Link meanwhile did not succeed by operating similar to that of minibus services based on fill-and-run principle, rather than operating based on scheduled services. Thus, the company shortly collapsed. Feedback from these results indicates that although City Link was popular, its operations were too thinly spread over the network and were not able to provide a reliable service. Public transport passengers within Kampala have very limited choice such as minibus services or motorcycle services with the majority as minibus services locally called taxis. 3.3.2 TAXI/MINIBUS Main supply of public transport in Kampala is now by minibuses, which are known locally as taxi (photographs bellow). KCC estimated that in 2003, there were nearly 7,000 minibuses based in the GKMA.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating New Mobility Services in Urban Transport
    Integrating new mobility services in urban transport Executive summary New mobility services and business models are changing urban transport, affecting both the supply and demand sides of urban mobility market. App-based mobility services such as car and ride sharing and Mobility as a Service (MaaS) through single or integrated ticketing services, offer new possibilities to expand and complement existing mobility and can help to balance public and private transport in cities. Evidence1 shows that these developments can lead to a significant reduction of single occupancy private car use and an increase of public transport use, leading to a strong reduction in congestion, local air pollution, and CO2 emissions. These benefits will occur when more vehicles are shared and private car ownership is reduced. Under these conditions, new mobility can change the way people live in cities: an International Transport Forum study found that in Lisbon ridesharing services could make public transport more efficient and thus end congestion, reduce traffic emissions by one third, and decrease required parking space.2 This illustrates the magnitude of the change and the important benefits resulting in moving towards an increasing use of shared mobility, public transport and integrated use of various mobility services. Despite their long term potential, the growth and development of new mobility services are often hampered by existing market access restrictions (e.g. limits on number of new mobility services), operational requirements (e.g. excessive vehicle restrictions), and financial disincentives (e.g. pricing regulation). Companies attempting to offer mobility as a service or single ticketing systems also have to manage the expectations and different business models of transport operators that they want to include in the service.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sixth Carbon Budget Surface Transport
    The Sixth Carbon Budget Surface Transport 1 This document contains a summary of content for the surface transport sector from the CCC’s Sixth Carbon Budget Advice, Methodology and Policy reports. 2 The Committee is advising that the UK set its Sixth Carbon Budget (i.e. the legal limit for UK net emissions of greenhouse gases over the years 2033-37) to require a reduction in UK emissions of 78% by 2035 relative to 1990, a 63% reduction from 2019. This will be a world-leading commitment, placing the UK decisively on the path to Net Zero by 2050 at the latest, with a trajectory that is consistent with the Paris Agreement. Our advice on the Sixth Carbon Budget, including emissions pathways, details on our analytical approach and policy recommendations for the surface transport sector, is presented across three CCC reports, an accompanying dataset and supporting evidence: • An Advice report: The Sixth Carbon Budget – The UK’s path to Net Zero, setting out our recommendations on the Sixth Carbon Budget (2033-37) and the UK’s Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) under the Paris Agreement. This report also presents the overall emissions pathways for the UK and the Devolved Administrations and for each sector of emissions, as well as analysis of the costs, benefits and wider impacts of our recommended pathway, and considerations relating to climate science and international progress towards the Paris Agreement. Section 1 of Chapter 3 contains an overview of the emissions pathways for the surface transport sector. • A Methodology Report: The Sixth Carbon Budget – Methodology Report, setting out the approach and assumptions used to inform our advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Reforming Private and Public Urban Transport Pricing Discussion Paper
    CPB Corporate Partnership Board Reforming Private and Public Urban Transport Pricing 170 Roundtable Discussion Paper Stef Proost Catholic University of Leuven CPB Corporate Partnership Board Reforming Private and Public Urban Transport Pricing 170 Roundtable Discussion Paper Stef Proost Catholic University of Leuven The International Transport Forum The International Transport Forum is an intergovernmental organisation with 59 member countries. It acts as a think tank for transport policy and organises the Annual Summit of transport ministers. ITF is the only global body that covers all transport modes. The ITF is politically autonomous and administratively integrated with the OECD. The ITF works for transport policies that improve peoples’ lives. Our mission is to foster a deeper understanding of the role of transport in economic growth, environmental sustainability and social inclusion and to raise the public profile of transport policy. The ITF organises global dialogue for better transport. We act as a platform for discussion and pre- negotiation of policy issues across all transport modes. We analyse trends, share knowledge and promote exchange among transport decision-makers and civil society. The ITF’s Annual Summit is the world’s largest gathering of transport ministers and the leading global platform for dialogue on transport policy. The Members of the Forum are: Albania, Armenia, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China (People’s Republic of), Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Korea, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Mexico, Republic of Moldova, Montenegro, Morocco, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom and the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Transport Accessibility on the Social Inclusion of Wheelchair Users: a Mixed Method Analysis
    Social Inclusion (ISSN: 2183-2803) 2016, Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages 24-35 Doi: 10.17645/si.v4i3.484 Article The Effect of Transport Accessibility on the Social Inclusion of Wheelchair Users: A Mixed Method Analysis Raquel Velho 1,*, Catherine Holloway ², Andrew Symonds ³ and Brian Balmer 1 1 Department of Science and Technology Studies, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK; E-Mails: [email protected] (R.V.), [email protected] (B.B.) ² Department of Computer Science, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK; E-Mail: [email protected] ³ Institute of Orthopaedic and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University College London, Stanmore, HA7 4LP, UK; E-Mail: [email protected] * Corresponding author Submitted: 20 October 2015 | Accepted: 9 February 2016 | Published: 7 June 2016 Abstract In recent years the accessibility of London buses has improved with the introduction of ramps and wheelchair priority areas. These advances are meant to remove physical barriers to entering the bus, but new conflicts have arisen particu- larly over the physical space aboard. We aimed to research the barriers faced by wheelchair users in public transport using a mixed methods approach to establish the breadth of issues faced by wheelchair users. To this end we quantified the push-force used alight a bus and a study to understand the coping mechanisms used by people to propel up a ramp. This quantitative approach found push forces which resulted in a load of 2 to 3 times body weight being transferred through people’s shoulders, forces which can be directly linked to shoulder injury.
    [Show full text]