DOCSLIB.ORG

Digital Performer Plug-Ins Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Digital Performer Plug-Ins Guide Title page Digital Performer ® 11 Plug-in Guide 1280 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 Business voice: (617) 576-2760 Business fax: (617) 576-3609 Technical support: (617) 576-3066 Tech support web: www.motu.com/support Web site: www.motu.com ABOUT THE MARK OF THE UNICORN LICENSE AGREEMENT receipt. If failure of the disk has resulted from accident, abuse or misapplication of the AND LIMITED WARRANTY ON SOFTWARE product, then MOTU shall have no responsibility to replace the disk(s) under this TO PERSONS WHO PURCHASE OR USE THIS PRODUCT: carefully read all the terms and Limited Warranty. conditions of the “click-wrap” license agreement presented to you when you install THIS LIMITED WARRANTY AND RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT IS IN LIEU OF, AND YOU the software. Using the software or this documentation indicates your acceptance of HEREBY WAIVE, ANY AND ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, BOTH EXPRESS AND IMPLIED, the terms and conditions of that license agreement. INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS Mark of the Unicorn, Inc. (“MOTU”) owns both this program and its documentation. FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. THE LIABILITY OF MOTU PURSUANT TO THIS LIMITED Both the program and the documentation are protected under applicable copyright, WARRANTY SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE REPLACEMENT OF THE DEFECTIVE DISK(S), AND trademark, and trade-secret laws. Your right to use the program and the IN NO EVENT SHALL MOTU OR ITS SUPPLIERS, LICENSORS, OR AFFILIATES BE LIABLE documentation are limited to the terms and conditions described in the license FOR INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO agreement. LOSS OF USE, LOSS OF PROFITS, LOSS OF DATA OR DATA BEING RENDERED INACCURATE, REMINDER OF THE TERMS OF YOUR LICENSE OR LOSSES SUSTAINED BY THIRD PARTIES EVEN IF MOTU HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE This summary is not your license agreement, just a reminder of its terms. The actual POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. THIS WARRANTY GIVES YOU SPECIFIC LEGAL RIGHTS license can be read and printed by running the installation program for the software. WHICH MAY VARY FROM STATE TO STATE. SOME STATES DO NOT ALLOW THE That license agreement is a contract, and clicking “Accept” binds you and MOTU to all LIMITATION OR EXCLUSION OF LIABILITY FOR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, SO THE its terms and conditions. In the event anything contained in this summary is ABOVE LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU. incomplete or in conflict with the actual click-wrap license agreement, the terms of UPDATE POLICY the click-wrap agreement prevail. In order to be eligible to obtain updates of the program, you must visit motu.com/ YOU MAY: (a) use the enclosed program on a single computer; (b) physically transfer registration and complete the on-line product registration form (or complete and the program from one computer to another provided that the program is used on only return to MOTU the Competitive Upgrade envelope if you have purchased a one computer at a time and that you remove any copies of the program from the Competitive Upgrade). computer from which the program is being transferred; (c) make copies of the COPYRIGHT NOTICE program solely for backup purposes. You must reproduce and include the copyright Copyright ©2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011, notice on a label on any backup copy. 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1998, YOU MAY NOT: (a) distribute copies of the program or the documentation to others; (b) 1997, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1993, 1992, 1991 by Mark of the Unicorn, Inc. All rights rent, lease or grant sublicenses or other rights to the program; (c) provide use of the reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, transmitted, transcribed, program in a computer service business, network, time-sharing, multiple CPU or stored in a retrieval system, or translated into any human or computer language, in multiple user arrangement without the prior written consent of MOTU; (d) translate, any form or by any means whatsoever, without express written permission of Mark of adapt, reverse engineer, decompile, disassemble, or otherwise alter the program or the Unicorn, Inc., 1280 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA, 02138, U.S.A. related documentation without the prior written consent of MOTU. Digital Performer, MOTU, Mark of the Unicorn and the unicorn silhouette logo are MOTU warrants to the original licensee that the disk(s) on which the program is trademarks of Mark of the Unicorn, Inc. Other trademarks are the property of their recorded be free from defects in materials and workmanship under normal use for a respective owners. period of ninety (90) days from the date of purchase as evidenced by a copy of your Contents Part 1: Plug-ins 50 MasterWorks Gate 52 MasterWorks Leveler 7 Audio Effects Plug-ins 55 MasterWorks Limiter 7 Overview 59 MegaSynth 8 Channel configurations 62 MicroG and MicroB 8 Common settings 63 MS Decoder 10 ACE-30 63 MultiFuzz 11 Analog Chorus 64 Multimode Filter 11 Analog Delay 65 ParaEQ 12 Analog Flanger 67 Pattern Gate 13 Analog Phaser 68 Phaser 13 Auto Pan 68 Plate 14 Bass Manager (surround only) 69 PreAmp-1 15 Calibration 71 Precision Delay 16 Chorus 73 ProVerb 17 Clear Pebble 76 Quan Jr. 17 Custom ’59 77 Reverb 19 D Plus 77 Reverse 19 DC Notch 77 Ring Modulator 20 De-Esser 79 RXT 21 Delay 79 SMPTE-Z 24 Delta Fuzz 80 Soloist 24 Diamond Drive 81 Sonic Modulator 25 Dynamic Equalizer 84 Spatial Maximizer 27 Dynamics 85 Springamabob 28 Dyna-Squash 86 Subkick 28 Echo 87 Tremolo 29 Ensemble Chorus 88 Trigger 30 eVerb 89 Trim 32 Flanger 90 Tube Wailer 32 Hardware Insert 91 Tuner 33 Hi-Top Booster 92 Über Tube 33 Intelligent Noise Gate 92 Wah Pedal 34 Invert Phase 35 Live Room B 37 Live Room G 38 Live Stage 39 MasterWorks Compressor 41 MasterWorks EQ 49 MasterWorks FET-76 iii Part 2: Instruments 158 Mixing and effects 158 Congratulations! 97 Instrument Plug-ins 159 The MX4 Window 97 Overview 159 Overview 98 BassLine 160 The disclosure buttons 99 PolySynth 161 Presets 100 Nanosampler 162 File 107 Modulo 163 Master section 118 Model 12 166 Status 123 MX4 166 Oscillators 124 Proton 171 Filters 127 MIDI Control of instrument settings 173 Envelopes 139 MOTU Instruments Soundbank 174 LFOs 139 Overview 176 Modulation 139 How it works 180 Mods 139 Downloading the soundbank 186 Mixer 140 Activating the soundbank 187 Effects 140 Installing UVI Workstation 189 Random 140 Accessing sounds 191 Modifier key shortcuts 141 A quick tour of UVIWorkstation 191 Contextual menus 142 Soundbank preset list 193 Five Things To Know About MX4 Part 3: MX4 Multi-synth Part 4: Appendices 145 About MX4 197 MX4 Troubleshooting 151 QuickStart Guide 197 Overview 153 MX4 Tutorial 197 MX4 FAQ 153 Overview 198 Conserving CPU resources 153 Load the tutorial preset 198 General troubleshooting 153 Enable an oscillator 199 MIDI troubleshooting 153 Adjust a parameter 200 Audio troubleshooting 154 Modulate OSC1 symmetry 200 Preventing Catastrophe 154 Contextual menus 200 Technical support 155 Use a wavetable 203 Glossary 156 Apply multiple modulation sources 207 MOTU Instrument presets 156 Enable a filter 261 MX4 NRPN Mapping 157 Add a second filter iv Part 1 Plug-ins CHAPTER 1 Audio Effects Plug-ins OVERVIEW Live Room B. 35 Digital Performer includes a variety of audio Live Room G . 37 effects plug-ins. The following sections discuss the Live Stage. 38 settings for each individual effect. MasterWorks Compressor . 39 MasterWorks EQ . 41 For general information about audio effects plug- MasterWorks FET-76 . 49 ins, see chapter 75, “Audio Effects Processing” MasterWorks Gate . 50 (page 897) in the DP4 User Guide. MasterWorks Leveler . 52 MasterWorks Limiter . 55 Channel configurations. 8 MegaSynth . 59 Common settings . 8 MicroG and MicroB. 62 ACE-30 . .10 MS Decoder . 63 Analog Chorus. .11 MultiFuzz . 63 Analog Delay . .11 Multimode Filter . 64 Analog Flanger . .12 ParaEQ . 65 Analog Phaser. .13 Pattern Gate . 67 Auto Pan . .13 Phaser . 68 Bass Manager (surround only) . .14 Plate . 68 Calibration . .15 PreAmp-1 . 69 Chorus . .16 Precision Delay. 71 Clear Pebble . .17 ProVerb . 73 Custom ’59 . .17 Quan Jr. 76 D Plus . .19 Reverb . 77 DC Notch . .19 Reverse . 77 De-Esser. .20 Ring Modulator . 77 Delay . .21 RXT . 79 Delta Fuzz . .24 SMPTE-Z . 79 Diamond Drive . .24 Soloist . 80 Dynamic Equalizer. .25 Sonic Modulator . 81 Dynamics . .27 Spatial Maximizer . 84 Dyna-Squash . .28 Springamabob. ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Digital Performer Plug-Ins Guide
    Title page Digital Performer ® 10 Plug-in Guide 1280 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 Business voice: (617) 576-2760 Business fax: (617) 576-3609 Technical support: (617) 576-3066 Tech support web: www.motu.com/support Web site: www.motu.com ABOUT THE MARK OF THE UNICORN LICENSE AGREEMENT receipt. If failure of the disk has resulted from accident, abuse or misapplication of the AND LIMITED WARRANTY ON SOFTWARE product, then MOTU shall have no responsibility to replace the disk(s) under this TO PERSONS WHO PURCHASE OR USE THIS PRODUCT: carefully read all the terms and Limited Warranty. conditions of the “click-wrap” license agreement presented to you when you install THIS LIMITED WARRANTY AND RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT IS IN LIEU OF, AND YOU the software. Using the software or this documentation indicates your acceptance of HEREBY WAIVE, ANY AND ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, BOTH EXPRESS AND IMPLIED, the terms and conditions of that license agreement. INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS Mark of the Unicorn, Inc. (“MOTU”) owns both this program and its documentation. FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. THE LIABILITY OF MOTU PURSUANT TO THIS LIMITED Both the program and the documentation are protected under applicable copyright, WARRANTY SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE REPLACEMENT OF THE DEFECTIVE DISK(S), AND trademark, and trade-secret laws. Your right to use the program and the IN NO EVENT SHALL MOTU OR ITS SUPPLIERS, LICENSORS, OR AFFILIATES BE LIABLE documentation are limited to the terms and conditions described in the license FOR INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • ON the NET 24 Hours in Cyberspace
    MARCH 1996 $5.75 E2.00 NNW ./ JO' . f r TIE INTERNATIONAL .+' TECHNICAL MAGAZINE FOR PRO AUDIO, POSTPRODUCTION & BROADCAST EXCLUSIVE ON THE NET 24 Hours in Cyberspace 03 HO 9 77014/.59401 7 www.americanradiohistory.com Oizce in a while a product comes along that is so unique, so powerful, that it c_ianges the way we look at things. Such a product is the Ap_iex 661 Compressor Limiter- creating a new standard by combining four Aphex irtventior s. A skillfully engineered instrument of unprecedented tlexib_lity, ea ;e of use and sonic eecellence. Tubessence® - true vacuum tube technology and warmth; High Frequency Expander (HFX)TM for automatically retaining the high frequencies lost during compression; Easyrider® circuitry for an Auto mode that really works; and the world's best VCA - the Aphex 1001, the fastest, most accurate and transparent available. The Aphex Model 661 - another revolutionary step toward improving the way the world sounds. APHEX Improving the way the world soundsd sm Tel: 818 -767 -2929, Fax: 818 -767 -2641 Y A T I V 11068 Randall Street, Sun Valley, CA 91352 www.americanradiohistory.com Editorial Tim Goodyer redesigns humans to suit today's machines Soundings Show news from MacWorld Expo, a report from the (AS (onference and developments from around the world of pro -audio International Columns Reports from Studio Sounds columnists in Europe, America and the Far East Hoboken's Waterfront Studio boasts two classic early 1970s EMI World Events The only exhaustive show and convention consoles and a wealth of unusual vintage
    [Show full text]
  • El Padre Del Sinte Y, Quizá, El Hombre Más Influyente En La
    Pioneros FM BOB MOOG La gente corriente conoce muy pocos nombres de creadores de instrumentos –Stradivarius, Hammond, Wurlitzer, Fender, Gibson… y por supuesto, Moog OB MOOG, en una revista de electrónica. EL padre del De repente, en plena adolescencia, sintetizador y, “El padre del sinte y, ya estaba haciendo y vendiendo kits con quizá, el hombre su pequeña empresa R.A. Moog Co. más influyente quizá, el hombre más En 1961, siendo todavía un estudiante, en la música publicó un diseño de theremin a durante las transistores del cual vendió más de mil últimas cinco influyente en la música unidades, bien como kits de montaje Bdécadas, murió el pasado 21 de Agosto. de los últimos 50 años” o como instrumentos finalizados. Tenía 71 años –una edad respetable para A partir de entonces, conoció muchos, pero no para él. Cualquiera al pionero de la música electrónica que haya podido compartir algún Raymond Scott, quien producía jingles momento con el entrañable Bob antes para importantes cadenas de TV de que le diagnosticaran un tumor cerebral en disfrutar durante unas horas de su inspiradora, con su enorme muro de equipos electrónicos. Abril de este mismo año, te confirmará que carismática y entrañable compañía. Es posible que aquello le inspirase, porque estaba lleno de energía, humor y vitalidad, así Por no molestar, Moog prefería viajar en tren a principios de los 60, Moog presentó, que es una auténtica pena que no haya podido o en autobús antes que aceptar el ofrecimiento de posiblemente, la mayor revolución de la música seguir algunas décadas más entre nosotros.
    [Show full text]
  • Design Project: Big Beat DJ Project Overview
    Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Department of Electrical, Computer, and Systems Engineering ECSE 4560: Signal Processing Design, Spring 2003 Professor: Richard Radke, JEC 7006, 276-6483 Design Project: Big Beat DJ “I never worked a day in my life; I just laid back and let the big beat lead me.” - The Jungle Brothers Project Overview A good techno DJ spins a continuous stream of music by seamlessly mixing one song into the next. This involves not only synchronizing the beats of the songs to be mixed, but also incrementally adjusting the pitches of the songs so that during the transition, neither song sounds unnatural. Your goal in this project is to use signal processing to produce a computerized DJ that can automatically produce a non-stop mix of music given a library of non-synchronized tracks as input. On top of this basic specification, additional points will be given for implementing advanced techniques like sampling, beat juggling and airbeats that make the mix more exciting. At the end of the term, the computer DJs will face off in a Battle for World Supremacy with a library of entirely novel songs. Basic Deliverables To meet the basic design requirement, your group should deliver • An m-file named bpm.m with syntax b = bpm(song) where song is the name of a music .wav file (or the vector of music samples themselves), and b is the estimated number of beats per minute in the specified song. • An m-file named songmix.m with syntax mix = = songmix(song1,song2), where mix is the resultant continuous mix between song1 and song2.
    [Show full text]
  • A Hip-Hop Copying Paradigm for All of Us
    Pace University DigitalCommons@Pace Pace Law Faculty Publications School of Law 2011 No Bitin’ Allowed: A Hip-Hop Copying Paradigm for All of Us Horace E. Anderson Jr. Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/lawfaculty Part of the Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, and the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Horace E. Anderson, Jr., No Bitin’ Allowed: A Hip-Hop Copying Paradigm for All of Us, 20 Tex. Intell. Prop. L.J. 115 (2011), http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/lawfaculty/818/. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. No Bitin' Allowed: A Hip-Hop Copying Paradigm for All of Us Horace E. Anderson, Jr: I. History and Purpose of Copyright Act's Regulation of Copying ..................................................................................... 119 II. Impact of Technology ................................................................... 126 A. The Act of Copying and Attitudes Toward Copying ........... 126 B. Suggestions from the Literature for Bridging the Gap ......... 127 III. Potential Influence of Norms-Based Approaches to Regulation of Copying ................................................................. 129 IV. The Hip-Hop Imitation Paradigm ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Spectator 1956-10-18 Editors of the Ps Ectator
    Seattle nivU ersity ScholarWorks @ SeattleU The peS ctator 10-18-1956 Spectator 1956-10-18 Editors of The pS ectator Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.seattleu.edu/spectator Recommended Citation Editors of The peS ctator, "Spectator 1956-10-18" (1956). The Spectator. 564. http://scholarworks.seattleu.edu/spectator/564 This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks @ SeattleU. It has been accepted for inclusion in The peS ctator by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ SeattleU. Spectator 18, No. 4 Vol. XXIV SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, OCTOBER 1956 SEATTLEChairmen Report UNIVERSITY New Assembly Board UGN Goal Topped Takes Office Thursday As Drive Finishes The newly elected Assembly Ray Weber: Insurance major in The climax of the United Good Board, legislative body of the the^ School of Commerce and Fi- Neighbors campaign this week was ASSU, will take office Thursday, nance, whose home is Seattle, 128; the announcement by student Oct. 18, at 7:30 p.m. in the Chief- Leo Roppo: Educationmajor also chairman Jim Plastino that the stu- tain Conference Room. of Seattle, 147; had of their dents reached 105% Tabulation of the votes cast in Mary Ann Onorato: Language goal. running of Soph- major from San expressedthe feelings of the this second the Arts in Education Jim omore and Junior races revealed Rafael, Calif., who was last year's UGN staff with the followingstate- big a close contest between the candi- Marycrest chairmanof the United ment: "It has naturally been a 162; goal for dates. Neighbors campaign, thrill for us to top our the Dennehy: Language Arts year.
    [Show full text]
  • Mediated Music Makers. Constructing Author Images in Popular Music
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Helsingin yliopiston digitaalinen arkisto Laura Ahonen Mediated music makers Constructing author images in popular music Academic dissertation to be publicly discussed, by due permission of the Faculty of Arts at the University of Helsinki in auditorium XII, on the 10th of November, 2007 at 10 o’clock. Laura Ahonen Mediated music makers Constructing author images in popular music Finnish Society for Ethnomusicology Publ. 16. © Laura Ahonen Layout: Tiina Kaarela, Federation of Finnish Learned Societies ISBN 978-952-99945-0-2 (paperback) ISBN 978-952-10-4117-4 (PDF) Finnish Society for Ethnomusicology Publ. 16. ISSN 0785-2746. Contents Acknowledgements. 9 INTRODUCTION – UNRAVELLING MUSICAL AUTHORSHIP. 11 Background – On authorship in popular music. 13 Underlying themes and leading ideas – The author and the work. 15 Theoretical framework – Constructing the image. 17 Specifying the image types – Presented, mediated, compiled. 18 Research material – Media texts and online sources . 22 Methodology – Social constructions and discursive readings. 24 Context and focus – Defining the object of study. 26 Research questions, aims and execution – On the work at hand. 28 I STARRING THE AUTHOR – IN THE SPOTLIGHT AND UNDERGROUND . 31 1. The author effect – Tracking down the source. .32 The author as the point of origin. 32 Authoring identities and celebrity signs. 33 Tracing back the Romantic impact . 35 Leading the way – The case of Björk . 37 Media texts and present-day myths. .39 Pieces of stardom. .40 Single authors with distinct features . 42 Between nature and technology . 45 The taskmaster and her crew.
    [Show full text]
  • Westminsterresearch Synth Sonics As
    WestminsterResearch http://www.westminster.ac.uk/westminsterresearch Synth Sonics as Stylistic Signifiers in Sample-Based Hip-Hop: Synthetic Aesthetics from ‘Old-Skool’ to Trap Exarchos, M. This is an electronic version of a paper presented at the 2nd Annual Synthposium, Melbourne, Australia, 14 November 2016. The WestminsterResearch online digital archive at the University of Westminster aims to make the research output of the University available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the authors and/or copyright owners. Whilst further distribution of specific materials from within this archive is forbidden, you may freely distribute the URL of WestminsterResearch: ((http://westminsterresearch.wmin.ac.uk/). In case of abuse or copyright appearing without permission e-mail [email protected] 2nd Annual Synthposium Synthesisers: Meaning though Sonics Synth Sonics as Stylistic Signifiers in Sample-Based Hip-Hop: Synthetic Aesthetics from ‘Old-School’ to Trap Michail Exarchos (a.k.a. Stereo Mike), London College of Music, University of West London Intro-thesis The literature on synthesisers ranges from textbooks on usage and historiogra- phy1 to scholarly analysis of their technological development under musicological and sociotechnical perspectives2. Most of these approaches, in one form or another, ac- knowledge the impact of synthesisers on musical culture, either by celebrating their role in powering avant-garde eras of sonic experimentation and composition, or by mapping the relationship between manufacturing trends and stylistic divergences in popular mu- sic. The availability of affordable, portable and approachable synthesiser designs has been highlighted as a catalyst for their crossover from academic to popular spheres, while a number of authors have dealt with the transition from analogue to digital tech- nologies and their effect on the stylisation of performance and production approaches3.
    [Show full text]
  • Immer Wieder Breit Moog Minimoog Voyager Select Series – Monofoner Synthesizer
    _ g 058 test minimoog voyager select Immer wieder breit Moog Minimoog Voyager Select Series – Monofoner Synthesizer Eigentlich muss man über den Minimoog Voyager nicht mehr viele Worte verlieren. Das Instrument gilt nicht nur unter Freaks als das absolute Sahneteil in Sachen „Analogsound-mitten-ins-Gesicht“. Dass wir diesem Ausnahmefetisch trotzdem erneut ein paar Zeilen widmen, hat damit zu tun, dass das Teil jüngst ein neues Gewand bekommen hat. Und – ach ja! – ein paar Neuigkeiten gibt’s auch zu berichten. text: Dr. Stefan Albus fotos: Dieter Stork, Archiv Im Ernst: Auch wem es völlig egal ist, ob die des Panels zu entzücken weiß (Fire, Blue, Solar, Voyager ist ein kleines, unscheinbares Poti Bässe, mit denen er seinen Groove dahermal- Lunar und Jade). Die Story hinter diesem opti- rechts neben der Tastatur, das der Regelung der men lässt, aus einem Renderer oder aus echter schen Update ist schnell erzählt: Bereits 2004 Hintergrundbeleuchtung dient. Seine Wirkung Elektronik kommen, der dürfte seinen Hut zie- brachte Moog eine „Electric Blue“ getaufte, sei hier nur trocken umrissen: Bei Rechtsdre- hen ob der Jahre, die der Minimoog Voyager schwarz-blaue Gary-Numan-Style-Variante der inzwischen auf dem Buckel hat. Fünf Lenze: Das Maschine heraus. Folge: Gib den Leuten den profil ist schon was in einer Branche, und manche kleinen Finger und ... Jedenfalls hofft man bei Keyboarder fragen sich, ob sie eigentlich noch Moog, dass mit den neuen „Selects“ die vielen Hersteller / Vertrieb: Instrumente oder Fashion-Items spielen. Anfragen nach individuell eingetönten Instru- Moogmusic / Und sicher auch ein legitimer Grund, dem Voyager menten erst mal abebben.
    [Show full text]
  • Keith Carlock
    APRIZEPACKAGEFROM 2%!3/.34/,/6%"),,"25&/2$s.%/.42%%3 7). 3ABIANWORTHOVER -ARCH 4HE7ORLDS$RUM-AGAZINE 'ET'OOD 4(%$25--%23/& !,)#)!+%93 $!.'%2-/53% #/(%%$ 0,!.4+2!533 /.345$)/3/5.$3 34!249/52/7. 4%!#().'02!#4)#% 3TEELY$AN7AYNE+RANTZS ,&*5)$"3-0$,7(9(%34(%-!.4/7!4#( s,/52%%$34/.9h4(5.$%2v3-)4( s*!+),)%"%:%)4/&#!. s$/5",%"!3335"34)454% 2%6)%7%$ -/$%2.$25--%2#/- '2%43#(052%7//$"%%#(3/5,4/.%/,$3#(//,3*/9&5,./)3%%,)4%3.!2%3%6!.34/-0/7%2#%.4%23 Volume 35, Number 3 • Cover photo by Rick Malkin CONTENTS 48 31 GET GOOD: STUDIO SOUNDS Four of today’s most skilled recording drummers, whose tones Rick Malkin have graced the work of Gnarls Barkley, Alicia Keys, Robert Plant & Alison Krauss, and Coheed And Cambria, among many others, share their thoughts on getting what you’re after. 40 TONY “THUNDER” SMITH Lou Reed’s sensitive powerhouse traveled a long and twisting musical path to his current destination. He might not have realized it at the time, but the lessons and skills he learned along the way prepared him per- fectly for Reed’s relentlessly exploratory rock ’n’ roll. 48 KEITH CARLOCK The drummer behind platinum-selling records and SRO tours reveals his secrets on his first-ever DVD, The Big Picture: Phrasing, Improvisation, Style & Technique. Modern Drummer gets the inside scoop. 31 40 12 UPDATE 7 Walkers’ BILL KREUTZMANN EJ DeCoske STEWART COPELAND’s World Percussion Concerto Neon Trees’ ELAINE BRADLEY 16 GIMME 10! Hot Hot Heat’s PAUL HAWLEY 82 PORTRAITS The Black Keys’ PATRICK CARNEY 84 9 REASONS TO LOVE Paul La Raia BILL BRUFORD 82 84 96
    [Show full text]
  • Computer Mediated Music Production: a Study of Abstraction and Activity
    Computer mediated music production: A study of abstraction and activity by Matthew Duignan A thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science. Victoria University of Wellington 2008 Abstract Human Computer Interaction research has a unique challenge in under- standing the activity systems of creative professionals, and designing the user-interfaces to support their work. In these activities, the user is involved in the process of building and editing complex digital artefacts through a process of continued refinement, as is seen in computer aided architecture, design, animation, movie-making, 3D modelling, interactive media (such as shockwave-flash), as well as audio and music production. This thesis exam- ines the ways in which abstraction mechanisms present in music production systems interplay with producers’ activity through a collective case study of seventeen professional producers. From the basis of detailed observations and interviews we examine common abstractions provided by the ubiqui- tous multitrack-mixing metaphor and present design implications for future systems. ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisors Robert Biddle and James Noble for their endless hours of guidance and feedback during this process, and most of all for allowing me to choose such a fun project. Michael Norris and Lissa Meridan from the Victoria University music department were also invaluable for their comments and expertise. I would also like to thank Alan Blackwell for taking the time to discuss my work and provide valuable advice. I am indebted to all of my participants for the great deal of time they selflessly offered, and the deep insights they shared into their professional world.
    [Show full text]
  • Automation: from Consoles to Daws
    California State University, Monterey Bay Digital Commons @ CSUMB Capstone Projects and Master's Theses Capstone Projects and Master's Theses 12-2016 Automation: From Consoles to DAWs Christian Ekeke California State University, Monterey Bay Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/caps_thes_all Part of the Music Education Commons Recommended Citation Ekeke, Christian, "Automation: From Consoles to DAWs" (2016). Capstone Projects and Master's Theses. 41. https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/caps_thes_all/41 This Capstone Project (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Capstone Projects and Master's Theses at Digital Commons @ CSUMB. It has been accepted for inclusion in Capstone Projects and Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ CSUMB. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Christian Ekeke 12/19/16 Capstone 2 Dr. Lanier Sammons Automation: From Consoles to DAWs Since the beginning of modern music there has always been a need to implement movement into a mix. Whether it is bringing down dynamics for a classic fade out or a filter sweep slowly building into a chorus, dynamic activity in a song has always been pleasing to the average music listeners. The process that makes these mixing techniques possible is automation. Before I get into details about automation in regards to mixing I will explain common ways automation is used. Automation in a nutshell is the use of various techniques, method, and system of operating or controlling a process by highly automatic means generally through electronic devices. In music however, automation is simply the use of a combination of multiple control devices to alter parameters in real time while a mix is being played.
    [Show full text]