UNLOCKING the GATES HOW and WHY LEADING UNIVERSITIES ARE OPENING up ACCESS to THEIR COURSES TAYLOR WALSH, in Conjunction with It

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

UNLOCKING the GATES HOW and WHY LEADING UNIVERSITIES ARE OPENING up ACCESS to THEIR COURSES TAYLOR WALSH, in Conjunction with It UNLOCKING the GATES HOW AND WHY LEADING UNIVERSITIES ARE OPENING UP ACCESS TO THEIR COURSES TAYLOR WALSH, in conjunction with Ithaka S+R PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS PRINCETON AND OXFORD To view the website for this Ithaka S+R project, visit: http://www.ithaka.org/ithaka-s-r/research/unlockingthegates To purchase the book from Princeton University Press, visit: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/9386.html Copyright © 2011 by Princeton University Press Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, 6 Oxford Street, Woodstock, Oxfordshire OX20 1TW press.princeton.edu All Rights Reserved To view the website for this Ithaka S+R project, visit: http://www.ithaka.org/ithaka-s-r/research/unlockingthegates To purchase the book from Princeton University Press, visit: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/9386.html CONTENTS Foreword by William G. Bowen Preface 1 Introduction: Context and Background 2 Early Experiments: Fathom and AllLearn 3 Free and Comprehensive: MIT‘s OpenCourseWare 4 Digital Pedagogy: Carnegie Mellon‘s Open Learning Initiative 5 Quality over Quantity: Open Yale Courses 6 A Grassroots Initiative: webcast.berkeley 7 Closing the Gap in India: The National Programme on Technology Enhanced Learning 8 Conclusions Epilogue: Implications for the Future References List of Interviews To view the website for this Ithaka S+R project, visit: http://www.ithaka.org/ithaka-s-r/research/unlockingthegates To purchase the book from Princeton University Press, visit: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/9386.html FOREWORD The seven case studies of ―online courseware‖ initiatives presented in Unlocking the Gates are instructive in a number of ways. At the most basic level, the rich detail provided by Taylor Walsh (on the basis of numerous interviews she conducted with the key participants, as well as her close examination of memos, reports, reviews, and other written materials) allows the reader to understand the thinking that went into the Fathom and AllLearn experiments, MIT‘s bold creation of OpenCourseWare (OCW), Carnegie Mellon‘s Open Learning Initiative (OLI), Open Yale Courses (OYC), webcast.berkeley, and India‘s National Programme on Technology Enhanced Learning (NPTEL). Considered together, these seven initiatives illustrate the many different options open to universities that wish to undertake online courseware projects, which differ from the by-now standard distance education models.1 This compilation of case studies demonstrates that there are multiple choices to be made in determining how much to invest in online courseware, what subjects to present, what audience to target, and what objectives— educational or reputational—to pursue. There is nothing approaching a single model, and comparing such different projects teaches a variety of lessons. There was a time, not all that long ago, when some in higher education believed that digital technologies offered a ripe opportunity to advance the educational mission of the institution 1 Online courses in higher education typically take the form of credit-bearing distance education for enrolled students—some of whom take a mix of online and traditional on- campus courses, while others complete entire degree programs online. According to a 2009 report on online education in the United States commissioned by the Sloan Consortium, ―over 4.6 million students were taking at least one online course during the fall 2008 term,‖ placing the rate of higher education students who take at least one of their courses online at more than one in four (Allen, Elaine, and Jeff Seaman, ―Learning on Demand: Online Education in the United States, 2009,‖ report supported by the Sloan Consortium and the Babson Survey Research Group, January 2010, 1). Colleges and universities can also use a growing number of specialized ―course modules‖ provided by for-profit companies such as Statistics.com—in effect, outsourcing some of their teaching. See Kolowich, Steve, ―The Specialists,‖ Inside Higher Ed, April 5, 2010. To view the website for this Ithaka S+R project, visit: http://www.ithaka.org/ithaka-s-r/research/unlockingthegates To purchase the book from Princeton University Press, visit: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/9386.html ready to venture into this terrain and, simultaneously, to make money that the institution could use for purposes of all kinds. That assumption proved to be incorrect, and it is perhaps the major lesson to be learned from Columbia‘s ill-fated effort to sell content through Fathom to a broad public and from the ultimately unsuccessful effort of Oxford, Princeton, Stanford, and Yale to market courseware to a primarily alumni constituency via a consortial entity called AllLearn. It is of course easier to understand what happened with hindsight than it was to anticipate problems at the start of these ambitious ventures; but the skeptic would have been right to warn against relying on untested assumptions when placing bets as big as the one Columbia placed on Fathom. The MIT OCW saga is the best known of these initiatives. The leadership at MIT also flirted with a for-profit model but concluded, following a careful study of different options that included advice from outside consultants, that there was no likelihood of a vibrant market for what MIT wanted to provide: online access to comprehensive course materials, but with no ―tutoring‖ in using them and no ―credentialing.‖ These two ―no‘s‖ are extremely important. Studies of online courses that involve continuing interactions with faculty have warned for years that providing such interactions can be demanding and expensive.2 We also know that it is the certificate or degree associated with completing a course of study that, in the minds of many, is what is really valuable (and thus marketable). Yet highly selective colleges and universities such as MIT have never seriously considered going down this ―credentialing‖ path. The reasons are both understandable and straightforward. Universities such as MIT believe that the educational 2 I discussed some of these issues, and other questions related to digitization and commercialization, in the Romanes Lecture that I gave at the University of Oxford in 2000 (Bowen, William G., ―At a Slight Angle to the Universe: The University in a Digitized, Commercialized Age,‖ http://www.mellon.org/news_publications/publications/romanes.pdf/view). To view the website for this Ithaka S+R project, visit: http://www.ithaka.org/ithaka-s-r/research/unlockingthegates To purchase the book from Princeton University Press, visit: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/9386.html value that they offer to their carefully chosen students derives in large part from the on-campus and in-person setting in which teaching and research take place. They do not want to undercut this value proposition by giving ―MIT credit‖ for a very different online offering that, in their view, would not be of ―MIT quality.‖ Presenting some of their own on-campus courses in a strictly online mode could also compromise their ability to compete with other elite universities for the very best students—many of whom expect face-to-face contact with professors and regular in-class interactions with talented peers. Charles Vest, MIT‘s exceedingly able president at the time the OCW initiative was launched, was both clear and eloquent in stating that making the outlines of MIT courses available for free, worldwide, was in his mind a direct extension of MIT‘s basic educational mission and justifiable on those grounds alone. Vest also understood that a highly visible—and highly accessible—OCW would strengthen MIT‘s already stellar international reputation. In addition, MIT has found that its own student community benefits from easy online access to course syllabi, lecture notes, and other teaching materials which serve to enhance, not replace, traditional modes of instruction. Yale‘s more targeted effort to produce truly high-quality versions of some of its most popular courses, with the ―look and feel‖ of being in the Yale classroom, is said to have been well received by Yale‘s alumni and, like MIT OCW, has received significant positive attention from the press. Yale believes that it has gotten good value from its investment in OYC. Benefits do not have to be financial to be consequential. webcast.berkeley is intended primarily to serve instructional purposes on the home campus. This is an instance of a large public university investing its own resources in the creation of relatively low-tech online instructional materials. The contrast with the elegance of To view the website for this Ithaka S+R project, visit: http://www.ithaka.org/ithaka-s-r/research/unlockingthegates To purchase the book from Princeton University Press, visit: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/9386.html OYC is striking. Severe resource constraints have clearly shaped Berkeley‘s approach and led it to pioneer in the development of low-cost instructional materials that are helpful to students who cannot attend a lecture at the time it is given or simply value the convenience of studying the material online at whatever time and place suit them. India‘s NPTEL represents yet another model that is suited to local circumstances. The Indian government has already begun investing heavily in online teaching because of its need to take fuller advantage of valuable teaching resources concentrated in elite institutes. The burgeoning demand for higher education in India argues strongly in favor of making fuller use of the country‘s top academic talent—of extending the reach of these faculty in cost-effective ways. It seems likely that other countries facing comparable needs to augment their teaching resources will experiment with similar models. Active government sponsorship of NPTEL addresses directly the considerable upfront investments in online resources that are required and also provides a valuable imprimatur. One project studied by Walsh, Carnegie Mellon‘s OLI, is so different from the others in certain key respects that I discuss it at greater length.
Recommended publications
  • A Resource Guide for Transitioning Your Class Online
    A Resource Guide for Transitioning Your Class Online SPECIAL REPORT MAGNA PUBLICATIONS CONTENTS Education Initiatives: A Mashup of Emergency A Checklist for Moving Your Resources and Other Great Course Online 03 Tips 13 How Teaching Online Can Eight Steps for a Smoother Improve Your Face-to-Face Transition to Online Teaching 05 15 Classes Five Ways to Foster Seven Ways to Facilitate Creativity in Your Online Effective Online Discussions 07 Classroom 19 Online Discussions: Would Simple Animation for Your Changing the Environment Courses 09 23 Help? What Do Students Really Want from Online Instruc- 11 tors? Education Initiatives: A Mashup of Emergency Resources and Other Great Tips Faculty Focus n response to COVID-19, we’ve seen in- links to educational resources from all over the structors and universities from around the world. Iworld come together to compile numer- ous resources and lists. Although we’ve only 4. Mandy Berry: A Facebook Post on skimmed the surface, we believe the following Remote Teaching links provide insight on different perspectives A public Facebook post from Amanda Berry, that institutions and staff are currently go- an assistant professor of literature at American ing through. From transitioning to an online University. course to fostering a productive conversation with your students, these resources shed light 5. Resources for Disruptions on education initiatives we hope you find use- A list of resources compiled by Ollie Dreon ful during this time of uncertainty. on his blog pertaining to transitioning to online teaching and coping with education initiatives 1. Remote Teaching Strategies— during this time of disruption.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining the Digital Services Landscape for the Middle East
    Defining the Digital Services landscape for the Middle East Defining the Digital Services landscape for the Middle East 1 2 Contents Defining the Digital Services landscape for the Middle East 4 The Digital Services landscape 6 Consumer needs landscape Digital Services landscape Digital ecosystem Digital capital Digital Services Maturity Cycle: Middle East 24 Investing in Digital Services in the Middle East 26 Defining the Digital Services landscape for the Middle East 3 Defining the Digital Services landscape for the Middle East The Middle East is one of the fastest growing emerging markets in the world. As the region becomes more digitally connected, demand for Digital Services and technologies is also becoming more prominent. With the digital economy still in its infancy, it is unclear which global advances in Digital Services and technologies will be adopted by the Middle East and which require local development. In this context, identifying how, where and with whom to work with in this market can be very challenging. In our effort to broaden the discussion, we have prepared this report to define the Digital Services landscape for the Middle East, to help the region’s digital community in understanding and navigating through this complex and ever-changing space. Eng. Ayman Al Bannaw Today, we are witnessing an unprecedented change in the technology, media, and Chairman & CEO telecommunications industries. These changes, driven mainly by consumers, are taking Noortel place at a pace that is causing confusion, disruption and forcing convergence. This has created massive opportunities for Digital Services in the region, which has in turn led to certain industry players entering the space in an incoherent manner, for fear of losing their market share or missing the opportunities at hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobile Developer's Guide to the Galaxy
    Don’t Panic MOBILE DEVELOPER’S GUIDE TO THE GALAXY U PD A TE D & EX TE ND 12th ED EDITION published by: Services and Tools for All Mobile Platforms Enough Software GmbH + Co. KG Sögestrasse 70 28195 Bremen Germany www.enough.de Please send your feedback, questions or sponsorship requests to: [email protected] Follow us on Twitter: @enoughsoftware 12th Edition February 2013 This Developer Guide is licensed under the Creative Commons Some Rights Reserved License. Editors: Marco Tabor (Enough Software) Julian Harty Izabella Balce Art Direction and Design by Andrej Balaz (Enough Software) Mobile Developer’s Guide Contents I Prologue 1 The Galaxy of Mobile: An Introduction 1 Topology: Form Factors and Usage Patterns 2 Star Formation: Creating a Mobile Service 6 The Universe of Mobile Operating Systems 12 About Time and Space 12 Lost in Space 14 Conceptional Design For Mobile 14 Capturing The Idea 16 Designing User Experience 22 Android 22 The Ecosystem 24 Prerequisites 25 Implementation 28 Testing 30 Building 30 Signing 31 Distribution 32 Monetization 34 BlackBerry Java Apps 34 The Ecosystem 35 Prerequisites 36 Implementation 38 Testing 39 Signing 39 Distribution 40 Learn More 42 BlackBerry 10 42 The Ecosystem 43 Development 51 Testing 51 Signing 52 Distribution 54 iOS 54 The Ecosystem 55 Technology Overview 57 Testing & Debugging 59 Learn More 62 Java ME (J2ME) 62 The Ecosystem 63 Prerequisites 64 Implementation 67 Testing 68 Porting 70 Signing 71 Distribution 72 Learn More 4 75 Windows Phone 75 The Ecosystem 76 Implementation 82 Testing
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1. the Freemium Business Model
    CHAPTER The Freemium Business Model 1 Commerce at a price point of $0 All business models are malleable thought structures, meant to be adapted and decisively employed to best achieve a specific product’s or service’s goals. This being understood, and for the purposes of this book, a broad and basic formal defi- nition of the freemium business model is described as follows: The freemium business model stipulates that a product’s basic functionality be given away for free, in an environment of very low or no marginal distribution and production costs that provides the potential for massive scale, with advanced func- tionality, premium access, and other product-specific benefits available for a fee. The freemium business model is an adaptation of a fairly common distribu- tion and monetization scheme used in software since the 1980s: the feature-limited software paradigm was when consumers saw most of the fundamental core com- ponents of a product released for free, with the product’s remaining functionality (such as saving progress or printing) becoming available only upon purchase, either in a one-time payment or through recurring subscription payments. The most basic point of difference between the freemium business model— freemium being a portmanteau of free and premium—and the feature-limited model is distribution: feature-limited software products were generally distributed on physical discs, whereas freemium products are almost exclusively distributed via the Internet. So the distribution speed and ultimate reach of feature-limited products were a function of the firm’s capacity to produce and ship tangible goods; no such restrictions limit the distribution of freemium products.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Research
    OPEN RESEARCH PITT, R; DE LOS ARCOS, B; FARROW, R & WELLER, M. OER HUB MILTON KEYNES, UK Open Research by OER HuB is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted. CONTENTS Introduction 1 1. Open Research 5 2. Ethics in the Open 20 3. Open Dissemination 43 4. ReQecting in the Open 58 5. Final Thoughts 66 Appendix 67 INTRODUCTION The OER Hub team in Krakow, Poland (l-r: Natalie Eggleston, Rob Farrow, Beck Pitt, Martin Weller & Bea de los Arcos) (CC BY 4.0 International, OER Hub) Welcome to the open textbook version of Open Research based on the two iterations of the award winning open course by the same name which was facilitated by the Hewlett Foundation funded Open Education Research (OER) Hub during 2014 and 2015. Thank you to everyone who participated in the facilitated versions of the course, and for your contributions and suggestions. We have retained the original feel of the original 4-week course but have revised and updated material for this Pressbook version. In addition, we have included many of the insightful contributions from participants and also suggest group activities so that you can use the textbook to facilitate discussions with students, colleagues or friends. Who is this resource aimed at? What does it mean to research in the open? Why should I make my research open? How do I research openly? 2 OPEN RESEARCH / INTRODUCTION If you have an interest in openness, open education, research skills or want to Ynd out more about the impact of Open Educational Resources (OER), then this resource is for you.
    [Show full text]
  • Princeton University Board of Trustees 2020–2021
    PRINCETON UNIVERSITY Trustee Occupation Alumni Association Princeton University BOARD OF TRUSTEES Yan Huo *94 Managing Partner & Chief 2020–2021 Investment Officer, Capula John Maclean House Committee to Nominate Investment Management LLP 73 Nassau Street Alumni Trustees Princeton, NJ 08540 Ex Officio Myesha D. Jemison ’18 Product Development Manager, 609.258.5813 Christopher L. Eisgruber ’83, President, Princeton University McMaster-Carr Philip Murphy, Governor of the State of New Jersey Kimberly H. Johnson ’95 Executive VP and Chief Operating April 2021 Officer, Fannie Mae Alumni Trustees Trustee Occupation Dean Emerita, Macaulay Honors Ann Kirschner *78 Trustees elected by Princeton’s alumni make up nearly one Amy E. Alving *88 Engineer College at The City University of New York third of the members of the University’s Board of Trustees. This Jackson A. Artis ’20 Systems Engineer, Analytical governing body is a working board and our elected trustees play Graphics, Inc.; Graduate Student, Melanie C. Lawson ’76 Reporter and Anchor, an important role in determining policy and setting the future Johns Hopkins KTRK-Television course of the University. We urge all alumni to reflect on the A. Scott Berg ’71 h03 Writer Anthony H.P. Lee ’79 Director, Aberon Pty Limited ballot material and to vote. Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo ’87 Professor & Chair, Dept. of Paul A. Maeder ’75 General Partner and Chair, Highland Last year, Princeton alumni elected Melissa H. Wu ’99 for Epidemiology & Biostatistics; Capital Partners Vice Dean of Population Health Region I Alumni Trustee, and Janeria A. Easley *16 for and Health Equity,University of Laura B. Overdeck ’91 Founder and President, Bedtime Math Recent Graduate School Alumni Trustee.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Secrets in Marketing and Value Creation
    Bentley University Scholars @ Bentley 2019 Dissertations and Theses 2019 The Use of Secrets in Marketing and Value Creation Ivan Fedorenko Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.bentley.edu/etd_2019 Part of the Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, Marketing Commons, and the Organizational Behavior and Theory Commons @Copyright 2019 Ivan Fedorenko THE USE OF SECRETS IN MARKETING AND VALUE CREATION Ivan Fedorenko A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of PhD in Business 2019 Program Authorized to offer degree: Marketing ProQuest Number:13883650 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. ProQuest 13883650 Published by ProQuest LLC ( 2019). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106 - 1346 In presenting this dissertation in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the doctoral degree at Bentley University, I agree that the Library shall make its copies freely available for inspection. I further agree that extensive copying of the dissertation is allowable only for scholarly purposes, consistent with “fair use” as prescribed in the U.S. Copyright Law. Requests for copying or reproduction of this dissertation may be referred to ProQuest Information and Learning Author Relations Team at (800) 521-0600 ext.
    [Show full text]
  • Transforming Your Saas Business
    Transforming your SaaS business A strategic guide for optimizing business performance kpmg.com/SaaS Contents 2 Executive Summary 4 Background: Evolution of an Industry 11 Business Model Dynamics: A New Way of Doing Business 18 Business Drivers: Optimizing Performance for Success 39 Leading Practices: Critical Steps for Achieving Success 44 Appendix: Strategic Drivers: Formulae and Examples Featured Industry Contributors 1 Mark Hawkins, CFO, Salesforce.com 2 Neil Williams, CFO, Intuit 2 Steve Cakebread, CFO, Yext 5 Mark Culhane, CFO, Lithium Technologies 5 Bob L. Corey, CFO, CallidusCloud 7 Ron Gill, CFO, NetSuite 8 Mark Garrett, CFO, Adobe 9 Kevin Bandy, Chief Digital Officer, Cisco 13 R. Scott Herren, CFO, Autodesk 15 Mike Kourey, CFO, Medallia 16 Matt Quinn, CTO and EVP Products & Technology, TIBCO 21 Clyde Hosein, CFO, RingCentral © 2016 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. Revolutionary changes in technologies have come in waves -- it brought us the mainframe, “the client-server and the cloud. From our experience, the cloud is exciting in that it enables us to help our customers connect with their customers in a whole new way. As the pioneer in Cloud SaaS offerings, we have witnessed disruption across industries and the globe as people embrace this dramatically improved technology. In 2015, the worldwide As a CFO, the big opportunity is how best to market for SaaS software support our respective companies in these application sales will be times of innovation and disruption, pivoting to new technology models and business models $33.4 billion in order to meet the modern day expectations with projections to grow and demands of customers and investors.
    [Show full text]
  • On April 3, 2000, the New Dot-Com Start-Up Fathom Was Launched with a Press Release Promising It Would “Redefine the Scope of Online Learning.” Turn the Page? No
    Draft of Willinsky, J. (2000, July 3). Virtual intellectuals. New Statesman, http://www.newstatesman.com. On April 3, 2000, the new dot-com start-up Fathom was launched with a press release promising it would “redefine the scope of online learning.” Turn the page? No. For once the hype understates it. Fathom changes the scope not only of online learning but of this information economy’s public sector. This super-brand “knowledge and education” outfit lays claim to no less than the intellectual assets of Columbia University, the London School of Economics and Political Science, Cambridge University Press, the British Library, Smithsonian Institution's National Museum of Natural History, and the New York Public Library. Amid banner ads, shopping opportunities, and a 10,000-course rooster, Fathom plans to offer free access to multimedia lectures, seminars, databases, publications, and performances, as well as a chance for people to “interact and collaborate” with experts. It’s another step in the blend of the public and commercial, presented in a way that makes it seem necessary, inevitable, and a public good. As George E. Rupp, Columbia's president explained to the New York Times, “we want to make sure that our core intellectual capital is not picked off by outside for-profit vendors. But for that, we have to be able to say to our faculty that we will devise ways they can communicate with a wider audience, which many of them would like.” I can forgive Rupp for thinking of his faculty as intellectual capital – they’ve done it to themselves – but his assumption that universities, even private ones, needs a for- profit e-biz to “communicate with a wider audience” is dismaying.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report 2020 Awards, Winners, Comments
    Independent Tests of Anti-Virus Software Summary Report 2020 Awards, winners, comments TEST PERIOD : 2020 LANGUAGE : ENGLISH LAST REVISION : 15TH JANUARY 2021 WWW.AV-COMPARATIVES.ORG Summary Report 2020 www.av-comparatives.org Content INTRODUCTION 3 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY 5 ANNUAL AWARDS 9 PRICING 16 USER EXPERIENCE REVIEW 18 AVAST FREE ANTIVIRUS 21 AVG ANTIVIRUS FREE 24 AVIRA ANTIVIRUS PRO 27 BITDEFENDER INTERNET SECURITY 30 ESET INTERNET SECURITY 34 F-SECURE SAFE 38 G DATA INTERNET SECURITY 41 K7 TOTAL SECURITY 45 KASPERSKY INTERNET SECURITY 48 MCAFEE TOTAL PROTECTION 52 MICROSOFT DEFENDER ANTIVIRUS 55 NORTONLIFELOCK NORTON 360 DELUXE 58 PANDA FREE ANTIVIRUS 61 TOTAL AV ANTIVIRUS PRO 64 TOTAL DEFENSE ESSENTIAL ANTI-VIRUS 67 TREND MICRO INTERNET SECURITY 70 VIPRE ADVANCED SECURITY 73 FEATURELIST COMES HERE 76 COPYRIGHT AND DISCLAIMER 77 2 Summary Report 2020 www.av-comparatives.org Introduction About AV-Comparatives We are an independent test lab, providing rigorous testing of security software products. We were founded in 2004 and are based in Innsbruck, Austria. AV-Comparatives is an ISO 9001:2015 certified organisation. We received the TÜV Austria certificate for our management system for the scope: “Independent Tests of Anti-Virus Software”. http://www.av-comparatives.org/iso-certification/ AV-Comparatives is the first certified EICAR Trusted IT-Security Lab http://www.av-comparatives.org/eicar-trusted-lab/ At the end of every year, AV-Comparatives releases a Summary Report to comment on the various consumer anti-virus products tested over the course of the year, and to highlight the high-scoring products of the different tests that took place over the twelve months.
    [Show full text]
  • The Open Course Library: Using Open Educational Resources to Improve Community College Access
    THE OPEN COURSE LIBRARY: USING OPEN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES TO IMPROVE COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACCESS By MARY ANN LUND GOODWIN A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY Department of Educational Leadership and Counseling Psychology DECEMBER 2011 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA. Mary Ann Lund Goodwin, 2011 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA. To the Faculty of Washington State University: The members of the Committee appointed to examine the dissertation of MARYANN LUND GOODWIN find it satisfactory and recommend that it be accepted. ______________________________ Kelly Ward, Ph.D., Chair ______________________________ Paul E. Pitre, Ph.D. ______________________________ Pat Sturko, Ph.D. iii THE OPEN COURSE LIBRARY: USING OPEN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES TO IMPROVE COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACCESS Abstract by Mary Ann Lund Goodwin, Ed.D. Washington State University December 2011 Chair: Kelly Ward Community colleges are committed to meeting the educational needs of the communities they serve and they have increased access to higher education by offering new and innovative services to students often unable to attend traditional baccalaureate institutions. An innovation known as Open Educational Resources (OER) promises to make college more accessible and affordable by reducing textbook costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Moocs Open Educational Resources? a Literature Review on History, Definitions and Typologies of OER and Moocs
    Open Praxis, vol. 11 issue 4, October–December 2019, pp. 331–341 (ISSN 2304-070X) 2019 Open Education Global Conference Selected Papers Are MOOCs Open Educational Resources? A literature review on history, definitions and typologies of OER and MOOCs Christian M. Stracke Open University of the Netherlands (The Netherlands) [email protected] Stephen Downes National Research Council (Canada) [email protected] Grainne Conole Independent Consultant (United Kingdom) [email protected] Daniel Burgos & Fabio Nascimbeni Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR), (Spain) [email protected] & [email protected] Abstract Open Education gained more visibility as a result of the emergence of Open Educational Resources (OER) and Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). This article discusses whether MOOCs should be considered as OER. Open Education and OER can be treated as two strands with different historical roots even though, in theory, OER are an aspect of Open Education. Different OER definitions and typologies are analyzed in relation to their dimensions and categorizations. Furthermore, the four conditions and two original categories of MOOCs are discussed, leading to a debate on their quality. It turns out that there are two perspectives on MOOCs: from an OER perspective, MOOCs as a product can be called OER. From an Open Education perspective, MOOCs are going beyond OER as enablers of Open Education and are understood as an innovative way of changing education. These perspectives are reflected by the OpenEd Quality Framework. The short answer to our leading question is: sometimes, and it depends on your perspective. Keywords: Open Education, Open Learning, Massive Open Online Courses, Open Educational Resources, literature review, OpenEd Quality Framework Introduction The topic of Open Education has become increasingly complex in recent years.
    [Show full text]