DOCSLIB.ORG

Lower Cosumnes River Watershed Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lower Cosumnes River Watershed Assessment Lower Cosumnes River Watershed Assessment December 2006 Photos by The Nature Conservancy and Robertson-Bryan, Inc., Lower Cosumnes River Watershed Assessment 13501 Franklin Boulevard Galt, CA 95632 Prepared by: 9888 Kent Street Elk Grove, CA 95624 (916) 714-1801 December 2006 Lower Cosumnes River Watershed Assessment Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose and Intended Use of the Document....................................................................... 1 1.2 Document Organization................................................................................................ 2 2 GEOGRAPHIC SCOPE...................................................................................................... 3 2.1 General Watershed Characteristics................................................................................... 3 2.2 Cosumnes River Preserve Management Area ....................................................................... 7 3 WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION...................................................................................... 9 3.1 Hydrology ............................................................................................................... 9 3.1.1 Precipitation ................................................................................................... 9 3.1.2 Historical Flow Patterns.................................................................................... 12 3.1.3 Historical Peak flows and Floods......................................................................... 14 3.2 Floodplain Topography and Geomorphology.................................................................... 16 3.2.1 Dillard Road to Wilton Road ............................................................................. 17 3.2.2 Wilton Road to Highway 99............................................................................ 19 3.3 Water Resources ...................................................................................................... 24 3.3.1 Surface Water Resources................................................................................... 26 3.3.2 Groundwater Resources ................................................................................... 27 3.3.3 Flood Protection Facilities ................................................................................. 29 3.3.4 Water Quality .............................................................................................. 31 4 COSUMNES RIVER PRESERVE RESOURCE CHARACTERIZATION .................................................. 33 4.1 Land Use .............................................................................................................. 36 4.1.1 Sacramento County General Plan........................................................................ 37 4.1.2 Elk Grove General Plan.................................................................................... 37 4.1.3 Galt General Plan .......................................................................................... 40 4.1.4 The Town of Thornton .................................................................................... 40 4.2 Biological Resources................................................................................................... 40 4.2.1 Vegetation................................................................................................... 40 4.2.2 Wildlife....................................................................................................... 53 4.2.3 Aquatic Resources.......................................................................................... 74 4.3 Cultural Resources .................................................................................................... 85 4.3.1 Introduction.................................................................................................. 85 4.3.2 Records Search Methods.................................................................................. 85 4.3.3 Records Search Results ..................................................................................... 85 4.3.4 Overview of Cultural Resources.......................................................................... 86 Cosumnes River Management Plan Robertson-Bryan, Inc. The Nature Conservancy page i Lower Cosumnes River Watershed Assessment 4.4 Key Restoration Projects and Research Studies ................................................................... 87 4.4.1 Riparian Forest Restoration by Planting .................................................................. 87 4.4.2 Floodplain/Riparian Restoration by Levee Breaching................................................... 87 4.4.3 Managed Wetlands........................................................................................ 87 4.4.4 Research at the Cosumnes River Preserve................................................................ 88 4.4.5 Managing Surface Water-Groundwater to Restore Fall Flows in the Cosumnes River........... 88 4.4.6 Cosumnes River Flow Augmentation Project ........................................................... 89 5 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 91 List of Tables Table 3-1. Average Monthly Streamflow by Water Year Type for Water Years 1960 to 2004................ 13 Table 3-2. Peak flows at selected recurrence intervals and locations on the Cosumnes River......................... 14 Table 3-3. Hourly peak flow events equal to or exceeding the 5-year recurrence interval (22,500 cfs). ....... 15 Table 4-1. Summary of Cosumnes River Preserve Land Holdings. ....................................................... 33 Table 4-2. Land Use Zone Definitions ...................................................................................... 36 Table 4-3. Vegetation Crosswalk Table. ................................................................................... 41 Table 4-4. Special–Status Plant Species Known to Occur in the Study Area. ....................................... 48 Table 4-5. Farming and Wildlife Activities.................................................................................. 60 Table 4-6. Special-Status Fish. ............................................................................................... 77 List of Figures Figure 2-1. Cosumnes River, Dry Creek, and Mokelumne River watersheds.............................................. 4 Figure 2-2. Cosumnes River watershed showing the major geologic regions, fault zones, and stream raches.......... 5 Figure 3-1. Mean annual precipitation for the Cosumnes and Mokelumne river watersheds. ........................ 10 Figure 3-2. Typical average monthly precipitation at various locations in the Cosumnes and Mokelumne watersheds. ........................................................................................ 11 Figure 3-3. Average Daily Streamflow for Water Years 1960 to 2004. ............................................. 13 Figure 3-4. Average Monthly Streamflow for Water Years 1960 to 2004.......................................... 13 Figure 3-5. Profile of the Cosumnes River and Deer Creek floodplain at RM 25.4. ................................. 18 Figure 3-6. Profile of Cosumnes River and Deer Creek floodplain at RM 23, upstream of the Folsom South Canal. ............................................................................................ 20 Figure 3-7. Aerial view of the Cosumnes River, floodplain, and Folsom South Canal looking west. ............... 20 Robertson-Bryan, Inc. Cosumnes River Management Plan page ii The Nature Conservancy Lower Cosumnes River Watershed Assessment Figure 3-8. Profile of the Cosumnes River floodplain at RM 12, showing the Cosumnes River Overflow Channel................................................................................................ 21 Figure 3-9. Cosumnes River looking north above Highway 99 showing the confluence with Deer Creek. ........ 22 Figure 3-10. Cosumnes River at a flow of approximately 10,000 cfs on March 25, 2005. ....................... 23 Figure 3-11. Profile of the Cosumnes River floodplain at RM 8.1, including Badger Creek........................... 23 Figure 3-12. Water Districts in the study area. ............................................................................... 25 Figure 3-13. Groundwater contour map of the IRMP study area. ........................................................ 28 Figure 3-14. Groundwater subbasins delineated in the Water Forum Agreement. ...................................... 30 Figure 4-1. Cosumnes River Preserve Land Holdings....................................................................... 35 Figure 4-2. Land Use Zones Surrounding the Lower Cosumnes River Watershed..................................... 38 Figure 4-3. Vegetation Types in the Preserve............................................................................... 39 List of Appendices A Cosumnes-Mokelumne Rivers Floodplain Reports and Studies B Cosumnes River Preserve Study Area Topographic Maps C Cosumnes Watershed Levees D Plant List for the Cosumnes River Preserve E Invasive Non-native Plant Species Managed at the Cosumnes River Preserve F Bird Species Known to Occur in the Cosumnes River Preserve Study Area G Animal Species Known to Occur in the Cosumnes River Preserve Study Area H Special-status
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Geography and Dialects of the Miwok Indians
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PUBLICATIONS IN AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGY AND ETHNOLOGY VOL. 6 NO. 2 THE GEOGRAPHY AND DIALECTS OF THE MIWOK INDIANS. BY S. A. BARRETT. CONTENTS. PAGE Introduction.--...--.................-----------------------------------333 Territorial Boundaries ------------------.....--------------------------------344 Dialects ...................................... ..-352 Dialectic Relations ..........-..................................356 Lexical ...6.................. 356 Phonetic ...........3.....5....8......................... 358 Alphabet ...................................--.------------------------------------------------------359 Vocabularies ........3......6....................2..................... 362 Footnotes to Vocabularies .3.6...........................8..................... 368 INTRODUCTION. Of the many linguistic families in California most are con- fined to single areas, but the large Moquelumnan or Miwok family is one of the few exceptions, in that the people speaking its various dialects occupy three distinct areas. These three areas, while actually quite near together, are at considerable distances from one another as compared with the areas occupied by any of the other linguistic families that are separated. The northern of the three Miwok areas, which may for con- venience be called the Northern Coast or Lake area, is situated in the southern extremity of Lake county and just touches, at its northern boundary, the southernmost end of Clear lake. This 334 University of California Publications in Am. Arch.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Guide Reprinted from the Central Valley Bird Club Bulletin COSUMNES RIVER PRESERVE by John Trochet General Information: Co
    Site Guide Reprinted from the Central Valley Bird Club Bulletin COSUMNES RIVER PRESERVE By John Trochet General information: Cosumnes River Preserve is a mosaic of wetlands, agricultural fields, grasslands, and the best remaining valley oak riparian woodland in California. The Preserve has 35,000 acres under management by The Nature Conservancy, Bureau of Land Management, Ducks Unlimited, County of Sacramento, and the California Departments of Fish and Game and Water Resources. It has been designated as a Globally Important Bird Area by the American Bird Conservancy and the National Audubon Society. Most of the Preserve is not open for public visitation. Opportunities for the public are described below. Directions: From the junction of Interstate 5 and Twin Cities Road about 22 miles south of Sacramento, go east 1 mile on Twin Cities Road to Franklin Blvd., and then south on Franklin Blvd. 1.3 miles to the parking lot for Willow Slough Trailhead on the left, 0.2 mile more to the parking lot for Lost Slough Boardwalk on the right, and then 0.2 mile more to the Visitor Center on the left. The Visitor Center is open from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Saturdays and Sundays, and sometimes on holidays. Directions for a Driving Tour are given in the next section. The birding: The Willow Slough Trail is a sampler of many of the habitats on the preserve, and is worth a visit at all seasons. It is, in my opinion, seriously under-birded. The trail makes a short descent from the parking lot, and is thereafter nearly level for the whole of its 3.3 mile length.
    [Show full text]
  • Riparian and Floodplain Restoration at the Cosumnes River Preserve
    Restoring Floods to Floodplains: Riparian and Floodplain Restoration at the Cosumnes River Preserve RAMONA O. SWENSON, KEITH WHITENER, AND MIKE EATON The Nature Conservancy, Cosumnes River Preserve, Galt, CA 95616 ABSTRACT. Riparian and floodplain ecosystems are shaped and sustained by the river’s hydrologic processes, such as flooding. The Cosumnes River Preserve is a multi-partner effort to protect and restore natural habitats within the floodplain of the Cosumnes River. This landscape-scale project protects over 40,000 acres of riparian forest, wetlands, and vernal pool grasslands. Early restoration efforts relied on active measures, such as hand planting of oaks and willows. This method, however, was expensive and labor intensive, and sometimes plantings failed. In the last several years we have focused on restoring natural processes that sustain and create habitat, such as flooding. Natural process restoration is now an integral part of the restoration program and central to our planning for property acquisition. Intentional levee breaches have restored the hydrologic connection between the lower Cosumnes River and its floodplain. Floods passing through levee breaches created in 1995 and 1997 have deposited sediment, seeds and plant cuttings on former farm fields, and stimulated natural recruitment of cottonwood and willow riparian forests. This method also provided valuable habitat for chinook salmon and Sacramento splittail. Creating seasonally flooded habitat rather than permanent ponds benefits native fishes more than non-native fishes. Monitoring by the Cosumnes Research Group and others is providing feedback for adaptive management. INTRODUCTION California’s riparian and floodplain ecosystems Valley and, as such, it retains much of its natural have been greatly modified and impaired.
    [Show full text]
  • Cosumnes River Preserve Management Plan Final
    COSUMNES RIVER PRESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN FINAL MARCH 2008 PREPARED FOR: COSUMNES RIVER PRESERVE 13501 FRANKLIN BOULEVARD GALT, CA 95632 PHONE: 916.683.1700 FAX: 916.683.1702 PREPARED BY: KLEINSCHMIDT ASSOCIATES 251 SOUTH AUBURN STREET, SUITE C GRASS VALLEY, CA 95945 PHONE: 530.852.4837 FAX: 530.852.4841 FUNDING MADE AVAILABLE BY A GRANT FROM THE CALFED WATERSHED PROGRAM AND ADMINISTERED BY THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD COSUMNES RIVER PRESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN FINAL March 2008 Prepared by: COVER PHOTOS COURTESY OF MIKE EATON COSUMNES RIVER PRESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Funding for this Management Plan was made available by a grant from the CALFED Watershed Program and administered by the State Water Resources Control Board. The Cosumnes River Preserve Partners envision the permanent protection of a continuous riparian corridor extending from the Cosumnes headwaters to the Delta, including adjacent floodplain and wetland habitats, and a vast vernal pool grassland complex supporting endangered species. The Partners will utilize stewardship and compatible ranching and farming activities as methods to sustain native plant and wildlife communities and the processes that perpetuate a dynamic mosaic of habitats. We will provide opportunities for people of all ages to appreciate the flora and fauna of the Cosumnes River Preserve and to experience being part of a natural landscape. -i- Cosumnes River Preserve Management Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CRP Driving Tour 2021 Final
    CCoossuummnneess RRiivveerr PPrreesseerrvvee Self-Guided Driving Tour Safety First This tour is designed to guide you through the public roads that wind throughout the entire scope of Cosumnes River Preserve. These are public roads, please pay You'll start at the Preserve's Visitor Center and finish just east of attention to other traffic and pull off to the shoulder when needed. Highway 99. Stay on the road or shoulder. Do not We suggest you bring along a co-pilot, pair of binoculars, and full walk/drive on levees or trespass onto tank of gas! Depending on frequency of stops, this tour will take private property. approximately 1-2 hours. Buckle up! Start at the Visitor Center 01 The Visitor Center is the heart of public access at the Preserve. From the Visitor Center you can access the trail head to our trails, boat launch, and the beginning of this guided tour! Cosumnes River Preserve is one of California's largest remaining examples of native Central Valley habitats and wildlife. It is characterized by a mosaic of grassland, natural and managed wetlands, riparian forests, and valley oak woodlands. Due primarily to development and urbanization, less than 2% of what existed in the mid-1800's exists today. 13501 Franklin Blvd. Galt, CA Cosumnes River A Place On the Pacific Flyway The Cosumnes River is the last free-flowing river west of the Sierra Nevada Mountains. This means that there are no major dams or levees preventing The Preserve's location is along the the river from flowing and flooding freely.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Moisture Availability As a Factor Affecting Valley Oak (Quercus
    Soil Moisture Availability as a Factor Affecting Valley Oak (Quercus lobata Neé) Seedling Establishment and Survival in a Riparian Habitat, Cosumnes River Preserve, 1 Sacramento County, California Virginia C. Meyer2 Abstract The lack of valley oak (Quercus lobata Neé) regeneration throughout much of its historical range appears to be related to both habitat destruction and soil moisture availability. The water relations, growth and survival of greenhouse potted seedlings, field-planted and natural seedlings were monitored through the growing season, 1989. The age structure of the valley oak population of a riparian forest at the Cosumnes River Preserve was determined. The history of fluvial events of the Cosumnes River was ascertained to determine whether such fluvial events are associated with past seedling establishment within the forest. Natural and non-irrigated field-planted seedlings exhibited considerable water stress, little stem growth and leaf loss, while greenhouse potted and irrigated field-planted seedlings displayed limited water stress. Irrigated field-planted seedlings grew vigorously. Past seedling establishment within the forest showed a positive relationship with historical fluvial events. These studies suggest that soil moisture availability is fundamentally important for successful establishment of valley oak seedlings. Significant recruitment of valley oak seedlings may be limited to years in which plentiful soil moisture is available into the growing season, i.e. with the natural flooding of unconfined riparian systems. Introduction The California endemic valley oak (Quercus lobata Neé) is found as a dominant species in riparian forests. Valley oak forests, woodlands and savanna are found on higher portions of the floodplain above riparian forests dominated by Fremont cottonwood (Populus fremontii) (Holstein 1984).
    [Show full text]
  • November 11 Observer.Indd
    The OBSERVER Sacramento Audubon Society General Meeting SACRAMENTO AUDUBON-SPONSORED Thursday, November 17, 2011 CHRISTMAS BIRD COUNT DATES FOR 2011-2012 Effie Yeaw Nature Center, Assembly Room Saturday, December 17, Woodfords Christmas Count 7pm General Meeting Coordinator: Tim Fitzer, 870-5207, e-mail: [email protected] Anza-Borrego’s Sister Park in Mongolia Compiler: Andi Salmi, 691-7216, e-mail: [email protected] Mark Jorgensen Monday, December 26, Folsom Christmas Count California’s largest State Park, Anza-Borrego Desert State Compiler: Chris Conard, 203-1610, e-mail: [email protected] Park, has an international Sister Park in the Gobi Desert of Mongolia. November’s speaker, retired Anza-Borrego Saturday, December 31, Sacramento Christmas Count Superintendent, Mark Jorgensen has travelled into the Compiler: Mark Cudney, 987-2422, e-mail: [email protected] Gobi six times to share his park and resource management experience with the rangers of the Mongolian Steppes. Other Christmas Bird Counts: Mark has helped organize a corps of six nomad rangers, Monday, December 19, Benecia-Napa Christmas Count helped outfit them with equipment to assist them in ful- Contact: Tim Fitzer (Grizzly Island), 870-5207, [email protected] or filling their jobs, and has generated funding for salaries, Compiler: Robin Leong, (707) 643-1287, [email protected] patrol motorcycles, laptop computers, and binoculars. The rangers of Ikh Nart Nature Reserve (see Ikhnart.com) have Saturday, December 17, Auburn Christmas Count curtailed the poaching of
    [Show full text]
  • Word Search and Fact Sheet
    Cosumnes River Preserve Can you find these important words related to the Preserve? W E H R N P T O S R M E J D S A Z V E A R H L J O U B M R N T M P R E P A S K E P T E I L E I I E E M T E I M O W X B L R Q S G M S L O Q F O R Y G S S F E A R U E F R L S I X N Y H E M Z M A V R F I A V T O V E W C N X R T D P P H E J S F D J E C P S L O O P F R T V S F B K O W I M L R W C Q L W J K N U M W T S N P Y Q Q G B P S E N M U S O C Y F V I T Y G J U L C C W A T E R F O W L J W S U G R A S S E S U H T G B T S K S T D G A P T D G K B E COSUMNES FISH WILDFLOWERS GRASSES MAMMALS MIGRATORY MIWOK MOKELUMNE PRESERVE RAPTOR RIVER SONGBIRD TREES WATERFOWL WATERSHED ©Cosumnes River Preserve, 2020 Learn More! Cosumnes River Preserve The Cosumnes River Preserve is over 50,000 acres of protected land centered around the Cosumnes River! It is owned and managed by 10 different partners.
    [Show full text]
  • JAN07 Observer.Indd
    The OBSERVER Sacramento Audubon Society General Meeting Thursday, January 18 Education Committee Shepard Garden and Art Center PHOTOS FOR EDUCATION 7pm General Meeting The Education Committee extends a big “Thank You” to Chris Conard for his more than generous contribution to our The Ivory-billed Woodpecker digital photo gallery. Chris provided over 100 images of birds, John Trochet 5 mammal images, 1 kingsnake, and 1 Tiger-swallowtail. On 28 April, 2005, simultaneously in Washington, D.C. and in Little Thanks to Chris and previously recognized contributors, we Rock, Arkansas, officials of The Nature Conservancy-Arkansas, Arkansas are well on our way to having a photo collection representa- Game and Fish Commission, Arkansas Natural Heritage Commission, tive of the flora and fauna of the Sacramento region. These photos will be put to good use very soon, as our new educa- Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, tion program is set to begin in earnest this month. Department of Interior, and Department of Agriculture confirmed the internet rumors that began the night of Please read the article on page 6 concerning the Education April 26th and circulated explosively 24 hours later: A Committee’s efforts to get kids involved in the Great Backyard living Ivory-billed Woodpecker had been discovered in Bird Count which takes place nationally the weekend of eastern Arkansas. February 16-19. John Trochet’s own explorations of swamps in the historical range of Ivory-billed Woodpecker goes back BIRDING FOR FUN WORKSHOP to 1974 and a visit to the Big Cypress area of south- Spring is a long way off, but we need to get word out now ern Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Control Plan, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. Amendments to the 1994 Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins The Third Edition of the Basin Plan was adopted by the Central Valley Water Board on 9 December 1994, approved by the State Water Board on 16 February 1995 and approved by the Office of Administrative Law on 9 May 1995. The Fourth Edition of the Basin Plan was the 1998 reprint of the Third Edition incorporating amendments adopted and approved between 1994 and 1998. The Basin Plan is in a loose-leaf format to facilitate the addition of amendments. The Basin Plan can be kept up-to-date by inserting the pages that have been revised to include subsequent amendments. The date subsequent amendments are adopted by the Central Valley Water Board will appear at the bottom of the page. Otherwise, all pages will be dated 1 September 1998. Basin plan amendments adopted by the Regional Central Valley Water Board must be approved by the State Water Board and the Office of Administrative Law. If the amendment involves adopting or revising a standard which relates to surface waters it must also be approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) [40 CFR Section 131(c)].
    [Show full text]
  • Cosumnes Subbasin SGMA Working Group Meeting Meeting #29 Meeting Held May 13, 2019 Prepared by the Consensus Building Institute and the Water Forum
    Cosumnes Subbasin SGMA Working Group Cosumnes Subbasin SGMA Working Group Meeting Meeting #29 Meeting held May 13, 2019 Prepared by the Consensus Building Institute and the Water Forum MEETING-IN-BREIF At the Cosumnes Subbasin Working Group’s twenty-ninth meeting, the EKI technical consulting team presented its preliminary Phase I data gaps assessment. Groundwater Sustainability Agencies will receive Technical Memo #2: Phase I Data Gaps Assessment from EKI at the end of May. The Working Group also discussed Proposition 68 grant funding, which a small group of GSA representatives will discuss further via teleconference in early June. EKI provided an update on cross-basin coordination, reporting that Eastern San Joaquin subbasin released Bundle 1 of its draft groundwater sustainability plan. The Cosumnes Working Group will jointly submit comments on Bundle 1, to be compiled by EKI and submitted by Sacramento County. The next Working Group meeting will take place on Wednesday, June 19, 2019. At its June meeting, the Working Group will confirm EKI’s data gaps assessment and plan to fill priority data gaps. ACTION ITEMS Who What Amador County Seek data from CASGEM well and new well in Jackson Creek OHWD Provide EKI with login for real-time well data Mike Wackman Reach out to Laura Foglia and Trevor Kennedy regarding well data Kerry Schmitz Reach out to Environmental Management regarding data OHWD and Water Continue discussion of Technical Support Services (TSS) proposal Forum Clay, Galt ID, SRCD Consider whether there is a TSS grant opportunity
    [Show full text]
  • WETLAND MANAGEMENT at COSUMNES RIVER PRESERVE C
    WETLAND MANAGEMENT AT COSUMNES RIVER PRESERVE c. Holden Brink Wetlands Manager, Cosumnes River Preserve One-hundred years ago, much of the Central Valley flooded naturally providing ample habitat for tens of millions of migrating waterfowl. Now only the Cosumnes River is undamed. Relatively few areas flood naturally. If wintering ducks, swans, and other waterbirds are to return to their northern nesting areas in good condition, existing habitat must be supplemented with artificially created and managed seasonal habitat. Cosumnes River Preserve is on the east side of I-5 about half way between Sacramento and Stockton. It originated in 1984 when The Nature Conservancy purchased an easement to protect riparian valley oak forest adjacent to the Cosumnes River. As the Conservancy acquired additional parcels, they generally had to purchase "the whole farm," not just the riparian forest. Portions of these farms had been leased to duck hunters and thousands of waterfowl came when the Cosumnes River flooded nearly every year. It immediately became apparent that another objective of the evolving Preserve would be to develop and enhance seasonal wetlands for migratory waterfowl. In 1986, Ducks Unlimited became a partner at the Preserve. They funded and supervised a contract for the construction of 170 acres of ponds, the start of what we now call the Barn Ponds. In 1988, the Bureau of Land Management purchased a 155 acre parcel, called the Wilson Wetland, that floods almost every year. The Preserve now totals 5,000, over 1000 of which are intensively managed for waterfowl. Much of the funding comes through the North American Waterfowl Management Plan, which identifies joint venture areas, such as the Central Valley of California, where important opportunities exist for the creation of seasonal waterfowl habitat.
    [Show full text]