Information Circular

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Information Circular Encana Corporation NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND INFORMATION CIRCULAR ANNUAL MEETING/CALGARY, ALBERTA/MAY 13, 2014 ENCANA CORPORATION NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS THE HOLDERS OF COMMON SHARES OF ENCANA CORPORATION ARE INVITED TO OUR ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS (THE “MEETING”) WHEN WHERE May 13, 2014 BMO Centre, Palomino Room 10:00 a.m. (Calgary time) 20 Roundup Way S.E. Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2G 2W1 WHAT THE MEETING IS ABOUT The purposes of the Meeting are: 1. to receive the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Auditor’s Report for the year ended December 31, 2013; 2. to elect directors; 3. to appoint the auditors for the ensuing year and authorize the directors to fix their remuneration; 4. to hold a non-binding advisory vote approving the Corporation’s approach to executive compensation, as described in the accompanying Information Circular; 5. to consider, and if deemed advisable, to pass, with or without variation, an ordinary resolution to confirm amendments to the Corporation’s By-Law No. 1 to add an advance notice requirement for nominations of directors by shareholders in certain circumstances, as more particularly described in the accompanying Information Circular; and 6. to transact such other business as may properly be brought before the Meeting or any adjournments thereof. WHO HAS THE RIGHT TO VOTE You are entitled to receive notice of and vote at the Meeting, or any adjournment or postponement, if you were a holder of common shares of Encana Corporation (“Common Shares”) as at the close of business on March 14, 2014. YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT As a shareholder, it is very important that you read this material carefully and then vote your shares, either in person or by proxy, at the Meeting. To be used at the Meeting, completed proxies must be received by our registrar and transfer agent, CST Trust Company, 600 The Dome Tower, 333–7Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 2Z1, by 10:00 a.m. (Calgary time) on May 9, 2014 or, in the case of any adjournment or postponement of the Meeting, not less than 48 hours (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays) before the time of the adjourned or postponed Meeting. The accompanying Information Circular tells you more about how to vote your Common Shares. If you have any questions, please contact our proxy solicitation agent, CST Phoenix Advisors, toll free in North America at 1-800-926-4985 or by email at [email protected]. IDENTIFICATION, ENTRY AND WEBCAST Shareholders, duly appointed proxyholders and registered guests may be requested to present government-issued or other appropriate identification prior to being permitted to enter the Meeting. The Corporation’s authorized representatives may also inspect bags and shall be entitled to require that bags not be brought into the Meeting. Persons who are not shareholders or duly appointed proxyholders and who wish to attend the Meeting as a registered guest should, in advance of the Meeting, request permission to attend via email to [email protected] or by mail to Investor Relations at Suite 4400, 500 Centre Street S.E., P.O. Box 2850, Calgary, Alberta, T2P 2S5. Only shareholders and duly appointed proxyholders are entitled to vote and participate in the business of the Meeting. A live audio webcast of the Meeting will be available on our website at www.encana.com. By Order of the Board of Directors of Encana Corporation, Jeffrey G. Paulson Vice-President, Corporate Legal Services & Corporate Secretary Calgary, Alberta March 14, 2014 ENCANA CORPORATION INFORMATION CIRCULAR General Information 2 Compensation Governance Practices 47 Voting Information 3 Compensation Risk Management 47 Matters To Be Voted On 4 Executive Share Ownership Guidelines 48 How to Vote – Registered Shareholders 4 Incentive Compensation Clawback Policy 48 Completing the Proxy Form – Registered Shareholders 5 No Hedging Policy 49 How to Vote – Non-Registered (or Beneficial) Shareholders 6 Performance Graph 49 How the Votes are Counted 7 Changes to our Program for 2014: What to Expect 51 Governance Overview – 2013 7 Our 2014 Company Scorecard 51 Purposes of the Meeting 8 2014 Compensation Decisions 51 Financial Statements 8 Summary Compensation Table 52 Election of Directors 8 Outstanding Option-Based Awards 53 Director Compensation 14 Outstanding Share-Based Awards 54 Appointment of Auditors Incentive Plan Awards – Value Vested or Earned During the Year 16 55 Auditors’ Fees 16 Retirement & Pension Plan Benefits 55 Non-Binding Advisory Vote on Approach to Executive Defined Contribution Pension Table 56 Compensation (“Say On Pay”) 16 Defined Benefit Pension Table 57 Amendments to By-Law No. 1 – Advance Notice of Nominations Termination and Change in Control Arrangements 59 of Directors 17 Change in Control Table 60 Statement of Executive Compensation 18 Conclusion 61 Letter to Shareholders 18 Equity Compensation Plan Information 62 Compensation Discussion and Analysis 22 Employee Stock Option Plan (“ESOP”) 62 Executive Overview 22 Performance Share Unit Plan (“PSU Plan”) 64 Human Resources and Compensation Committee 24 Restricted Share Unit Plan (“RSU Plan”) 65 Role and Responsibilities 24 Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity HRCC Independent Compensation Advisor 25 Compensation Plans 66 Human Resources Management 25 Statement of Corporate Governance Practices 67 Other Compensation Advisory Services 26 Encana’s Objectives 67 Our Compensation Approach 27 Board of Directors 69 Our Compensation Philosophy 27 Board of Directors’ Mandate 70 Compensation Elements 27 Position Descriptions 71 Total Direct Compensation 29 Orientation and Continuing Education of Directors 71 Compensation Peer Group 29 Ethical Business Conduct 73 Compensation Decision-Making Process 30 Nomination of Directors 73 New CEO: Compensation Arrangements 32 Corporate Governance 74 2013 Compensation Decisions 33 Compensation Committee 74 Former CEO 33 Audit Committee 75 Interim CEO 33 Other Board Committees 76 Annual Base Salary 34 Assessments of the Board 76 Annual Incentive (or “Bonus”) Plan 34 Key Governance Documents 76 Company Score 34 Other Matters 77 Determining Annual Bonus Eligibility 34 Shareholder Proposals 77 Changes to our Company Scorecard in 2013 35 Additional Information 77 2013 Company Scorecard 35 Questions and Other Assistance 78 Approved 2013 Company Score 37 Directors’ Approval 78 2013 Bonus Awards 37 Appendix A A-1 2013 Executive Officer LTI Grants 41 Amendments to By-Law No. 1 – Advance Notice of Determination of LTI Award Value 41 Nominations of Directors A-1 Mix of LTI Vehicles 42 Appendix B B-1 Performance Share Units (“PSUs”) 42 Advisory Regarding Reserves Data and Other Stock Options 45 Oil and Gas Information B-1 Restricted Share Units (“RSUs”) 45 Non-GAAP Measures B-1 NEO Departures in 2013 46 Appendix C C-1 Other Compensation Elements 46 Board of Directors’ Mandate C-1 Executive Benefits & Perquisites 46 Pension and Retirement Arrangements 46 Employee Deferred Share Unit Plan 47 1 GENERAL INFORMATION This Information Circular is dated March 17, 2014 and delivered in connection with the solicitation of proxies by and on behalf of the management of Encana Corporation for use at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Meeting”) and any adjournment or postponement thereof. In this document, “we”, “us”, “our”, “Company”, “Corporation” and “Encana” refer to Encana Corporation. The solicitation will be primarily by mail, but proxies may also be solicited personally by employees and agents of Encana. We have retained CST Phoenix Advisors (“Phoenix”) to solicit proxies for us in Canada and the United States at a fee of approximately C$35,000, plus out-of-pocket expenses. All expenses in connection with the solicitation of proxies will be borne by Encana. If you have questions about the information contained in this Information Circular or require assistance in completing your proxy or voting instruction form, please call Phoenix at 1-800-926-4985 (North American toll-free) or by email at [email protected]. Unless otherwise stated, the information contained in this Information Circular is given as at March 17, 2014 and all dollar amounts are expressed in Canadian dollars (“C$”), except for the dollar amounts contained in the “Director Compensation” and “Statement of Executive Compensation” sections, which are expressed in United States dollars (“US$” or “U.S. dollars”), except as otherwise stated. 2 VOTING INFORMATION YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT – AS A SHAREHOLDER, IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT YOU READ THIS INFORMATION CIRCULAR CAREFULLY AND THEN VOTE YOUR COMMON SHARES, EITHER BY PROXY OR IN PERSON, AT THE MEETING. VOTING You may convey your voting instructions as follows: 1. by mail; 2. by fax; 3. by telephone; 4. on the internet; or 5. by appointing another person to attend the Meeting and vote your Common Shares for you (“your proxyholder”). You may authorize the directors of Encana who are named on the enclosed proxy form to vote your Common Shares at the Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. You have the right to appoint another person to act as your proxyholder. If you appoint someone else, he or she must be present at the Meeting to vote your Common Shares. If you are voting your Common Shares by proxy, our registrar and transfer agent, CST Trust Company (“CST”), or other agents we appoint, must receive your completed proxy form by 10:00 a.m. (Calgary time) on May 9, 2014 or, in the case of any adjournment or postponement of the Meeting, not less than 48 hours (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays) before the time of the adjourned or postponed Meeting. Registered Shareholders You are a Registered Shareholder if Common Shares are registered in your name and you have a physical (paper) share certificate. Non-Registered (or Beneficial) Shareholders You are a Non-Registered Shareholder if a broker, investment dealer, bank, trust company, trustee, nominee or other intermediary holds your Common Shares for you (your “Intermediary”). Non-Registered Shareholders do not ordinarily have a physical (paper) share certificate.
Recommended publications
  • United States District Court Southern District of Texas Houston Division
    Case 4:10-md-02185 Document 113 Filed in TXSD on 02/14/11 Page 1 of 182 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION In re BP plc Securities Litigation No. 4:10-md-02185 Honorable Keith P. Ellison LEAD PLAINTIFFS NEW YORK AND OHIO’S CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR ALL PURCHASERS OF BP SECURITIES FROM JANUARY 16, 2007 THROUGH MAY 28, 2010 Case 4:10-md-02185 Document 113 Filed in TXSD on 02/14/11 Page 2 of 182 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................2 II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE ........................................................................................11 III. THE PARTIES ..................................................................................................................11 A. Plaintiffs .................................................................................................................11 B. Defendants .............................................................................................................12 C. Non-Party ...............................................................................................................17 IV. BACKGROUND ...............................................................................................................17 A. BP’s Relevant Operations ......................................................................................17 B. BP’s Process Safety Controls Were Deficient Prior to the Class Period ...............18
    [Show full text]
  • Obama Vows Help As BP Sees Oil Spill Progress 5 June 2010, by Allen Johnson
    Obama vows help as BP sees oil spill progress 5 June 2010, by Allen Johnson As Obama promised assistance, oil spill-stricken Gulf of Mexico residents anxiously awaited news about BP's latest effort to contain the massive leak, now the worst environmental disaster in US history. The firm has lowered a containment vessel over a leaking ruptured well-pipe allowing oil to collect and be siphoned up via a tube to the Enterprise, a container ship on the surface. The US official overseeing the response to the spill, Marine One with US President Barack Obama aboard Admiral Thad Allen, was to provide an update on and a second support helicopter fly to New Orleans after the process at 1445 GMT, amid uncertainty about Obama met with local business owners and residents in just how much oil was being collected. Grand Isle, Louisiana. US President Barack Obama has promised to use "every resource" to help those affected "The flow of oil and gas to the Enterprise was shut by the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, as Americans await news down for three hours overnight," said Coast Guard of BP's latest containment effort. spokesman First Class Petty Officer Zach Zubricki. "It resumed at 3:30 am (0730 GMT)," he told AFP, saying he had no information on how much oil was US President Barack Obama promised on being captured. Saturday to use "every resource" to help those affected by the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, as An estimated 20 million gallons of crude has Americans awaited news of BP's latest poured into the Gulf since an April 20 explosion containment effort.
    [Show full text]
  • National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling
    National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling STOPPING THE SPILL: THE FIVE-MONTH EFFORT TO KILL THE MACONDO WELL ---Draft--- Staff Working Paper No. 6 Staff Working Papers are written by the staff of the National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling for the use of members of the Commission. They are preliminary, subject to change, and do not necessarily reflect the views either of the Commission as a whole or of any of its members. In addition, they may be based in part on confidential interviews with government and non-government personnel. The effort to contain and control the blowout of the Macondo well was unprecedented. From April 20, 2010, the day the well blew out, until September 19, 2010, when the government finally declared it “dead,” BP expended enormous resources to develop and deploy new technologies that eventually captured a substantial amount of oil at the source and, after 87 days, stopped the flow of oil into the Gulf of Mexico. The government organized a team of scientists and engineers, who took a crash course in petroleum engineering and, over time, were able to provide substantive oversight of BP, in combination with the Coast Guard and the Minerals Management Service (MMS).1 BP had to construct novel devices, and the government had to mobilize personnel on the fly, because neither was ready for a disaster of this nature in deepwater. The containment story thus contains two parallel threads. First, on April 20, the oil and gas industry was unprepared to respond to a deepwater blowout, and the federal government was similarly unprepared to provide meaningful supervision.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Officials Mohamed Al Hammadi H.E
    Government Officials Mohamed Al Hammadi H.E. Eng. Tarek El Molla Luis Alberto Moreno CEO, Emirates Nuclear Energy Corporation Minister of Petroleum, Egypt President, Inter-American Development Bank Mr. Saad Sherida Al-Kaabi Hon. Paul M. Dabbar (IDB) Minister of State for Energy Affairs, Qatar Under Secretary for Science, US DOE Hon. Lisa Murkowski Ibrahim Al-Muhanna Francis Fannon Chairman, US Senate Consultant & Advisor to Saudi Oil Ministry, Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of Energy Diego Mesa Ministry of Energy, Industry and Mineral Resources (ENR), US DOS Vice Minister of Energy, Colombia Resources Saudi Arabia Thomas R. Hardy H.E. Rocío Nahle García Ayed S. Al-Qahtani Director (Acting), U.S. Trade and Development Secretary of Energy, Ministry of Energy Mexico Director of Research Division, OPEC Agency (USTDA) Nurlan Askarovich Nogaev Hon. John Peter Amewu Hirohide Hirai Minister of Energy, Ministry of Energy, Republic Minister of Energy, Ghana Director-General, Ministry of Economy, Trade of Kazakhstan Minister Bento Albuquerque and Industry (METI) Seamus O’Regan Minister of Mines & Energy, Brazil William Hohenstein Minister of Natural Resources, Canada H.E. Mohammad Sanusi Barkindo Director of the Office of Energy and Jeff Radebe Secretary General, OPEC Environmental Policy, U.S. Department of Special Envoy for Energy, South Africa Renata Beckert Isfer Agriculture (USDA) Kadri Simson Deputy Secretary of Oil, Natural Gas and Andrew Kamau Commissioner, European Biofuels, MME, Brazil Principal Secretary, State Department of Commission for Energy Dr. Fatih Birol Petroleum, Ministry of Petroleum and Mining, María Fernanda Suárez Londoño Executive Director, IEA Kenya Minister of Mines and Energy, Ministry of Mines Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Petroleum News 041308
    page IOGCC hosts Alaska gas line panel: 9 Canadians, Alaskans on AGIA Vol. 13, No. 15 • www.PetroleumNews.com A weekly oil & gas newspaper based in Anchorage, Alaska Week of April 13, 2008 • $1.50 ● NATURAL GAS MGM posts Mackenzie success New gas partnership ConocoPhillips, BP form company to build Alaska natural gas pipeline COURTESY MGM ENERGY COURTESY By KRISTEN NELSON Petroleum News Governor, legislators he prospect for an Alaska gas pipeline ratcheted pleased with Denali up several notches April 8 with an announcement Both the governor and lawmakers seemed T by ConocoPhillips and BP that the two were pleased by the BP-ConocoPhillips announce- beginning work on a North Slope gas pipeline, a ment of their joint-venture Alaska North Slope to project they are calling market gas pipeline project, although both the Denali — The Alaska administration and legislators were left wonder- Gas Pipeline. ing where the announcement leaves the Alaska MGM Energy said it believes the natural gas discovery could be Jim Bowles, presi- Gasline Inducement Act process, the state’s effort developed as a satellite of the existing Langley field, improving dent of ConocoPhillips the economics of development. See story on page 3. to jump start a gas pipeline with $500 million in Alaska, and Doug Suttles, president of BP Exploration matching funds in exchange for meeting 20 state (Alaska) said at a joint press conference that the com- “must haves.” B.C. makes industry’s life easier panies expect to spend $600 million through an open Gov. Sarah Palin was briefed April 8 by BP season in late 2010, early 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineered Solutions for Industry Challenges
    ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS FOR VOLUME 07 ISSUE 10-OCTOBER 2014 INDUSTRY CHALLENGES OILFIELD TECHNOLOGY OCTOBER 2014 | EXPLORATION | DRILLING | PRODUCTION www.energyglobal.com weir194_oilfield_tech_cover_0918.indd 1 9/19/14 9:31 AM Gentle on nature. Brutal on scale. ® Bellasol S65 Oil & Gas Antiscalant High pressures and high temperatures? Now get the highest performance oilfield antiscalant on the market. New Bellasol S65 biodegradable antiscalant - outperforms traditional phosphonates and polyaspartate for cal- cium carbonate and barium sulfate scale inhibition. Hydrothermally stable to 200ºC at pH 12. Resistant to iron. Detectable in brines to 1ppm. Meets highest OSPAR biodegradability standards. Contact us today: Bellasol oilfield antiscalant range [email protected] Bellasol S28 General scale control Bellasol S30 Calcium scale control [email protected] Bellasol S50 Mixed scale control & [email protected] chemical compatibility [email protected] Bellasol S65 High performance and biodegradable www.wateradditives.com 130 89 October 2014 Contents Volume 07 Issue 10 03 Comment 59 Kicking hydraulic fracturing’s water addiction 05 World news Bill Charneski, OriginOil, USA, looks at how to quench the thirst of the shale industry without putting undue strain on water supplies. 12 Boom not bust Generation automation Oilfield Technology Correspondent Gordon Cope shows how North America’s oil 63 and gas industry is growing from strength to strength. Angelo Calderoni and Marco Cercato, Drillmec, Italy, examine a new generation of fully automated drilling rigs. 18 Optimising O&G operations from the ground up Dave Lipomi, Tensar International, USA, explains how geogrid systems can provide 67 Making mud matter the infrastructure support that oil and gas operations need. Ray Nagatini, Encapso, USA, shows how innovations in applied biotechnology are enabling 23 Predicting the future of hydraulic fracturing operators to implement smarter, leaner mud programmes.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to BP
    Gulf Coast State Attorneys General Troy King James D. “Buddy” Caldwell Bill McCollum Jim Hood Greg Abbott Attorney General Attorney General Attorney General Attorney General Attorney General State of Alabama State of Louisiana State of Florida State of Mississippi State of Texas Rupert Bondy Group General Counsel BP P.L.L.C. International Headquarters 1 St James's Square London, SW1Y 4PD UK Stephen R. Winters, Esq. Associate Group General Counsel Refining and Marketing, Global BP America Inc. 4101 Winfield Road – 4W Warrenville, Illinois 60555 Mr. Doug Suttles Chief Operating Officer BP Exploration & Production Inc. 200 Westlake Park Boulevard Houston, Texas 77079 Dear Messrs. Bondy, Winters & Suttles: As the Attorneys General for the five Gulf Coast states, we write concerning the Deepwater Horizon oil spill that threatens our coasts and shared natural resources—as well as the livelihood of our coastal citizens and communities. In the wake of the tragic loss of human life that has already occurred, our top concern now must be the well-being of the precious environmental and wildlife resources of our states. Protecting the fragile coastal ecologies and economies is critical to preserving the ongoing sustainability of our coastal communities. From the fisherman and shrimpers who rely directly upon the Gulf for their income, to the local businesses that are sustained by our fishing communities, and the small businesses that thrive on coastal tourism, this oil spill threatens the health and safety of our coastal communities. In addition, if the oil spill is not fully remediated, it could be an ecological and economic disaster for all of our states.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Bp in the Deepwater Horizon Explosion and Oil Spill Hearing
    THE ROLE OF BP IN THE DEEPWATER HORIZON EXPLOSION AND OIL SPILL HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND INVESTIGATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JUNE 17, 2010 Serial No. 111–137 ( Printed for the use of the Committee on Energy and Commerce energycommerce.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 77–914 WASHINGTON : 2013 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Mar 15 2010 08:56 Mar 04, 2013 Jkt 077914 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 E:\HR\OC\A914.XXX A914 rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with HEARING COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE HENRY A. WAXMAN, California, Chairman JOHN D. DINGELL, Michigan JOE BARTON, Texas Chairman Emeritus Ranking Member EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts RALPH M. HALL, Texas RICK BOUCHER, Virginia FRED UPTON, Michigan FRANK PALLONE, JR., New Jersey CLIFF STEARNS, Florida BART GORDON, Tennessee NATHAN DEAL, Georgia BOBBY L. RUSH, Illinois ED WHITFIELD, Kentucky ANNA G. ESHOO, California JOHN SHIMKUS, Illinois BART STUPAK, Michigan JOHN B. SHADEGG, Arizona ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York ROY BLUNT, Missouri GENE GREEN, Texas STEVE BUYER, Indiana DIANA DEGETTE, Colorado GEORGE RADANOVICH, California Vice Chairman JOSEPH R. PITTS, Pennsylvania LOIS CAPPS, California MARY BONO MACK, California MICHAEL F. DOYLE, Pennsylvania GREG WALDEN, Oregon JANE HARMAN, California LEE TERRY, Nebraska TOM ALLEN, Maine MIKE ROGERS, Michigan JANICE D. SCHAKOWSKY, Illinois SUE WILKINS MYRICK, North Carolina CHARLES A.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil and Gas News Briefs, June 7, 2018
    Oil and Gas News Briefs Compiled by Larry Persily June 7, 2018 Exxon, Rosneft continue with plans for Far East LNG project (Reuters; June 7) - U.S. major ExxonMobil and Russian energy company Rosneft expect their future joint project to produce more than 6.2 million tonnes of liquefied natural gas per year, Interfax news agency quoted an ExxonMobil manager as saying June 7. ExxonMobil is pushing ahead with efforts to develop its $15 billion Far East LNG project with Rosneft, despite being forced to exit some joint ventures in Russia due to Western sanctions. The LNG plant would be built on Sakhalin Island, north of Japan. The plant's capacity also could be increased from planned initial volumes, Interfax reported, citing James Grable, a manager at the Sakhalin-1 joint venture with Rosneft. Earlier this year, Exxon invited companies including China National Petroleum Corp.’s engineering arm to bid for construction contracts by October, sources with knowledge of the matter said. A final investment decision is due in 2019, they said. Exxon and Rosneft have also held discussions — as an alternative to building their own LNG plant — about feeding gas from their Sakhalin-1 fields into a planned third production unit at the liquefaction plant run by Gazprom and Shell, also on Sakhalin Island. That project, Sakhalin-2, started producing LNG in 2009, with capacity of 9.6 million tonnes per year. The Exxon-Rosneft Sakhalin-1 development has been producing oil since 2005. It’s current output is about 200,000 barrels a day, as the companies work toward an investment decision for the gas reserves.
    [Show full text]
  • Drumbeat: August 6, 2010
    The Oil Drum | Drumbeat: August 6, 2010 http://www.theoildrum.com/node/6819 Drumbeat: August 6, 2010 Posted by Leanan on August 6, 2010 - 9:19am Topic: Miscellaneous China: Energy-intensive firms lose electricity aid BEIJING: Preferential electricity rates granted by 22 provincial governments for high energy-consuming businesses have been totally scrapped, China's top economic planner announced Friday. All energy-intensive enterprises must be subject to the new power tariff surcharges introduced in May, said the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) in a statement posted on its website. The news comes three days after Chinese statistics authorities said China's consumption of energy relative to economic output rose in the first half by 0.09 percent from the same period last year. quote> Crude Falls as U.S. Jobs Report Raises Concern Economic Growth Is Slowing Crude oil fell for a third day as weaker-than-forecast growth in U.S. company payrolls bolstered concern that economic growth in the world’s biggest oil- consuming country is slowing. Oil slipped as much as 2.4 percent after the Labor Department said private payrolls that exclude government agencies rose by 71,000, less than forecast, after a gain of 31,000 in June that was smaller than previously reported. A government report on Aug. 4 showed that U.S. fuel supplies rose last week as demand fell. Southwestern Energy Says Dry Weather May Slow Pennsylvania Shale-Gas Work Southwestern Energy Co., the largest natural-gas producer in the Fayetteville Shale of Arkansas, said development of the Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania may be slowed if dry weather continues the next few months.
    [Show full text]
  • Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Complaint
    Case 2:10-cv-02795 Document 1 Filed 08/20/10 Page 1 of 67 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA CORLISS GALLO; TIGHT LINES FISHING CHARTERS, LLC; RED HOT FISHING CHARTERS, LLC; ERNEST J. BROWNE, JR.; GULF COAST ASSETS, CASE NO. LLC, d/b/a BREATH’S BOATS & MOTORS; JUDY and LAWRENCE SIMPSON; RETREAT, INC.; DAVE PHELPS; and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, JUDGE: vs. MAGISTRATE JUDGE BP, P.L.C.; BP AMERICA, INC.; BP CORPORATION NORTH AMERICA, INC.; JURY DEMAND BP COMPANY NORTH AMERICA, INC.; BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION, INC.; BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC.; TRANSOCEAN LTD.; TRANSOCEAN, INC.; TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE DEEPWATER DRILLING, INC.; TRANSOCEAN DEEPWATER, INC.; HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC.; and CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION f/k/a COOPER CAMERON CORPORATION, Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Case 2:10-cv-02795 Document 1 Filed 08/20/10 Page 2 of 67 Plaintiffs Corliss Gallo, Tight Lines Fishing Charters, LLC, Red Hot Fishing Charters, LLC, Ernest J. Browne, Jr., Gulf Coast Assets, LLC, d/b/a/ Breath’s Boats & Motors, Judy and Lawrence Simpson, Retreat, Inc., and Dave Phelps, individually and as representatives of the class and subclasses defined herein, bring this action against Defendants BP, p.l.c., BP America, Inc., BP Corporation North America, Inc., BP Company North America, Inc., BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP Products North America, Inc., Transocean Ltd., Transocean, Inc., Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc., Transocean Deepwater, Inc., Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., and Cameron International Corporation f/k/a Cooper Cameron Corporation, as follows: I. INTRODUCTION 1. Plaintiffs and the nationwide class and state-wide subclasses they seek to represent are fishermen, property owners, business owners, and wage earners on the Gulf of Mexico in the States of Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida and Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • Filippijnse Matrozen Claimen Achterstallig Loon Gyron Crew
    122e jaargang nummer 28 DEZE WEEK MET SCHEEPSBOUWSPECIAL Zaterdag 17 juli 2010 losse nummers 3,15 euro Duitsland: 3,85 euro AP Vakblad voor Rijn- en binnenvaart, kust- en zeevaart, visserij, scheepsbouw, offshore, recreatie- en chartervaart Van cao-loon op papier blijft netto 397 euro per maand over Meest gelezen DEZE WEEK op Schuttevaer.nl 2 Kanalenconferentie heeft nog kwart miljoen euro nodig 1. Voetbalkoorts binnenvaart Filippijnse matrozen claimen 2. AIS-installateurs verwijten RWS en 3 Zorgen over uitbesteding IVW laksheid bij handhaving inspecties 6 ‘Wij zorgen dat Nederland 3. Makkie voor Wendy-Dua niet vervuilt’ 4. Verhaalschijven en –rollen vallen 5 Een heel gedoe, maar het buiten elke klasseneis achterstallig loon Gyron Crew resultaat is leuk’ 9 Verstrikt in P-Traplijnen 11 Schipperszoon wil 5. Dieptepunt achter de rug over zes jaar ouderlijk 7 Limburg wil ‘binnenvaart- 10 Offshore belangrijk voor schip overnemen Aantal bekeken pagina’s: 92.928 Door Dirk van der Meulen Inc in Manilla aanmerkte als ‘fictief voor de betreffende functie en of de goud delven’ Amsterdamse werf Bezoeken aan de site: 29.456 werkgever’ en de bestaande vrijstel- werkgever voldoende inspanningen Vier Filippijnse matrozen op Nederlandse binnen- ling van het betalen van belastingen heeft verricht om zijn vacatures met en premies introk. Gyron Crew moet dit aanbod te vervullen. Wanneer vaartschepen claimen van hun voormalig ‘werkge- sindsdien belasting en premies in er geen geschikte en beschikbare vers’ Gyron Crew Inc. in Manilla en Gyron Shipping Nederland betalen, maar er loopt werkzoekenden staan ingeschreven nog een beroepsprocedure. bij UWV WERKbedrijf of zijn ver- PTE Ltd in Singapore samen 75.959,95 euro als Volgens de Filippijnse POEA is wezen door EURES (het Europese achterstallig loon op het basissalaris.
    [Show full text]