SOURCE MATERIAL SINGER ADMITS HE IS FUNDED by the MOONIES [Whose Extreme Anti-Democratic, Pro-Business, Anti-Environmenta1 Views
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
2 SOURCE MATERIAL SINGER ADMITS HE IS FUNDED BY THE MOONIES [whose extreme anti-democratic, pro-business, anti-environmenta1 views are well-known] "When asked by Nightline [ABC NEWS TV SHOW], Dr. Singer openly acknowledged accepting free office space, science conference travel expenses and contributions from the Unification Church, as well as funding from large industries. 'Every environmental organization I know of gets funding from Exxon, Shell, Arco, Dow Chemical,' and so on,' said Singer. _/Tf it doesn't taint their science, it doesn't taint my science.'" "Gore-Gate: An Abuse of Power" in Blue Ribbon Magazine (uploaded to CompuServe) April 1994 Quotes are from Ted Koppel's ABC Nightline program "Is Science for Sale". "Vice President Gore, Koppel told his viewers, was particularly concerned about Dr. Fred Singer of the Washington, D.C.-based Science and the Environmental Policy Project (SEPP), well known for debunking the ozone depletion and global warming scares. [Blue Ribbon, as above] SINGER'S PRO-WHALING ARTICLE, PUBLISHED IN THE MOONIE-OWNED WASHINGTON TIMES, IS USED BY PR FLACK FOR JAPAN WHALING ASSOCIATION. Alan Macnow of Tele-press Associates, is the U.S. public relations agent for the Japan Whaling Association, as well as the Japanese fishing industry. He uses Fred Singer's views, without explaining Fred's connections, to bolster his campaign on the Internet to defeat a whale sanctuary (Japan has been whaling in the Antarctic). Topic 151 WHALE SANCTUARY CRITICIZED amacnow talk.environment 11:10 am May 6, 1994 Following is the text of an article written by Dr. S. Fred Singer, Professor of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, as printed in the Washington, DC, Times, on May 5, 1994. Dr. Singer directs the Science and Environmental Policy Project. Fred Singer, Expert Expert 3 SCIENTIFIC SHALLOWS OF WHALE SANCTUARY IDEA The push to set up an international "sanctuary" for whales in the southern Oceans appears to be yet another example of the misuse of science to support an ideological agenda. The U.S. position, put forward by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) of the National Oceanographic and Atmo spheric Administration (NOAA), seems to have been shaped by years of pressure from special interests, like Greenpeace, thatfwant to outlaw any kind of whaling - even for abundant, non endangered species where there is no justification ..;. [edited for length] r HERE IS A PAID PRESS RELEASE, FROM SINGER'S MOONIE INSTITUTE, SAYING THAT U.S. GOVERNMENT SCIENTISTS WRECKED A PLANNED CONFERENCE OF HIS, BECAUSE THEY REFUSED TO SPEAK AT IT. THE ISSUE IS WHALING. COMMENTS: [Mr. Singer has in previous years spoken widely only on climate related issues, but here expands his expertise, suddenly, into marine mammals...The "conference" was to be stacked with a preponderance of pro-whaling and right-wing sources, including: * the "High North Alliance" founded after an anti-Greenpeace film made by Icelandic film-maker Magnus Gudmundsson. Gudmundsson was successfully sued for damages by Greenpeace in an Oslo Norway court, and certain passages were ordered removed. * "Putting People First" the then-Washington based fund-raising machine started by Bill Wewer and Kathleen Marquardt - her book being widely advertised in Larouche's 21st Century magazine, and her anti-environmentalist articles finding publication in magazines like the gun-crazy "Soldier of Fortune". * 3 representatives of the Norwegian government (who have been whaling despite IWC rules). * "Sportsmen"> Icelandic (pro-whaling country) and Canadian experts (Canada allows whaling for aboriginal people), etc. etc. And tossed out as seemingly neutral parties - "PUBLIC POLICY ORGANIZATIONS" - the far-right think-tanks Competitive Enterprise Institute and the Hudson Institute. The conference was never held, as U.S. scientists refused to attend. Environmentalists listed did not plan to attend, and the listing of the IWC phone number at the bottom of the press release is very misleading, as though the IWC promoted this press Fred Singer, Expert Expert 4 release and Singer's conference. In fact, the IWC also refused to send a representative. The list of "attendees” is purely fictional. [] PR Newswire September 15, 1993, Wednesday ' SECTION: Washington Dateline DISTRIBUTION: TO NATIONAL AND BUSINESS EDITORS , LENGTH: 780 words HEADLINE: SEPP CONFERENCE ON WHALING POSTPONED; NOAA REFUSES TO ALLOW U.S. SCIENTISTS TO SPEAK ON 'TOO SENSITIVE' ISSUE PRIOR TO CLINTON'S DECISION ON TRADE SANCTIONS AGAINST NORWAY, DUE OCT. 4 DATELINE: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) — Under Secretary of Commerce Dr. D. James Baker, administrator, 202-482-3436 — Rebecca Roots, 202-482-6076 Norwegian Embassy — Olav Berstad, first secretary for economic affairs, 202-944-8926 — Birgir Xarsen, counsel, 202-333-6000 Congressional Sportsmen's Caucus, U.S. House of Representatives — Dallas Miner, 202-785-9153 SCIENTISTS: — Dr. William Aron, director, Alaska Fisheries Research Center,206-526-4000 — Dr. Milton Freeman, Canadian'Circumpolar Institute, University of Alberta, expert on community-based whaling, 403-492-4512 — Dr. Daniel Goodman, adviser to Canadian minister of fisheries, 613-990-0284 — Dr. Philip Hammond, former chairman, IWC Science Committee, marine population biologist with the Sea Mammal Research Unit, Cambridge, England, 011-44-223-311-354, fax: 011-44-223-328-927 - Dr. John Knauss, former U.S. IWC commissioner and NOAA administrator, 401-294-4877 — Dr. Eugene LaPointe, former secretary general of UN-CITES, 813-734-4949 — Dr. Brian Rothschild, University of Maryland, 410-326-4281 — Dr. Johann Sigurjonsson, Marine Research Institute (Iceland), 011-354-1-20240 — Dr. Tim Smith, Woods Hole Marine Research Institute, 508-548-5123 Fred Singer, Expert Expert 5 ECONOMISTS/INTERNATIONAL LAW EXPERTS: — Dr. Daniel Esty, Institute for International Economics, 202-328-9000 — Dr. Ted McDorman, University of Victoria, expert on legality of trade sanctions on the whaling issue in relation to GATT, 604-721-8181 ANTI-WHALING ACTIVIST GROUPS: — Earth Island Institute: 415-788-3666 — Humane Society of the United States, 202-452-1100 * — Sea Shepherd Conservation Society: 310-394-3198 — Greenpeace: Gerald Leape, 202-319-2401 PRO-WHALING ACTIVIST GROUPS: — High North Alliance: Georg Blichfeldt, 011-47-88-92-414 (Norway) — Putting People First: Mark La Rochelle/ Kathleen Marquardt, 202-364-7277 INDUSTRY ASSOCIATIONS: — National Fisheries Institute: Lee Weddig, 703-524-8880 PUBLIC POLICY ORGANIZATIONS: — Competitive Enterprise Institute: James M. Sheehan, 202-331-1010 . — Hudson Institute: Dave McIntosh, 317-545-1000/ BODY: T)ie conference, 11 From 'Moby Dick' to 'Free Willy': Conflicting Views on the Whaling Issue," scheduled for Sept. 15 on Capitol Hill, was forced into a last-minute postponement last week when the sponsoring organization, The Science & Environmental Policy Project (SEPP), was informed by Under Secretary of commerce D. James Baker, administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), that no U.S. government scientist would be cleared to participate prior to President Clinton's decision on possible trade sanctions against Norway. A similar response was received from the International Whaling Commission (IWC), through its Secretary Dr. Ray Gambel. According to Rebecca Roots of Baker's office, the issue is just "too sensitive." The Norwegian government, which played a vital role in the just- signed peace agreement between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization, came under threat of U.S. trade sanctions on Aug. 5, when U.S. Secretary of Commerce Ronald H. Brown "certified” Norway under the Pelly Amendment to the Fishermen's Protective Act. Norway's harvest of 296 minke whales this year was deemed to have ’’diminished the effectiveness of the conservation program of the International Whaling Commission.” As Fred Singer, Expert Expert 6 a result of the certification President Clinton must report to Congress on actions taken within 60 days, or by Oct. 4, 1993. Said SEPP President S. Fred Singer: "The United States is threatening economic sanctions to accommodate environmental extremists who want an outright ban.on all whaling. This is contrary to the principle of sustainable development, which permits the harvesting of a renewable resource based on scientific data. What we have here," he concluded, "is yet another example of environmental policy based on the deliberate avoidance of scientific evidence." * Plans for the SEPP conference were set in motion after the abrupt resignation of Dr. Philip Hammond, chairman of the International Whaling Commission's Science Committee. As reported in the June 18, 1993, issue of the journal "Science," Hammond stepped down after the IWC failed to adopt the committee's unanimous recommendation on quotas for whale catches that would not harm a species population. (At the request of the IWC, the Science Committee has spent five years developing a computer model for the purpose of establishing quotas* The IWC must adopt the model before it can lift its seven-year-old moratorium on commercial whaling.) The refusal of the IWC to accept the Science Committee's report has led to fears that it is moving toward a permanent ban on whaling — despite evidence that many whale populations are not endangered — thus violating its basic management mission. In his resignation letter to IWC Secretary Ray Gambel, Hammond questioned the point of retaining a Science Committee whose advice is "treated with such contempt."