DOCSLIB.ORG

Mark Meadows (NC-11): Swamp Creature

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MARK MEADOWS (NC-11) Swamp Creature | 1 Mark Meadows (NC-11): Swamp Creature Significant Findings Meadows owned up to $6 million in real estate assets that could benefit from the Republican tax bill Meadows received $85,039 in privately-funded travel, including lavish trips to Oslo and Berlin Meadows worked to push the Republican health care repeal bill further to the right, making it even worse for North Carolina families Meadows consistently voted with the Republican establishment and 94% of the time with Paul Ryan Biography Mark Meadows is a Member of Congress representing North Carolina’s 11th Congressional District and has served in that position since 2013. Born July 1959 in Maginot Army Barracks in Verdun France Education: University of Southern Florida, A.A. (1980) Professional: sandwich shop owner, real estate agent, real estate development Was Macon County Republican Party chairman from 2001 to 2002 Meadows Benefitted From The Perks Of Congress Meadows Has Received $870,000 In Taxpayer Funded Salary Over his five years in Congress, Meadows has received a total of $870,000 in taxpayer-funded salary. Year Congressional Salary 2013 $174,000 2014 $174,000 2015 $174,000 2016 $174,000 2017 $174,000 TOTAL $870,000 [Congressional Research Service, 6/21/16] Meadows Voted To Raise His Own Pay MARK MEADOWS (NC-11) Swamp Creature | 2 2013: Meadows Voted Against Continuing Appropriations That Blocked COLA For Members. In May 2014, Meadows voted against: “Passage of the bill that would provide $3.3 billion for legislative branch operations, excluding Senate operations, in fiscal 2015. The total would include $1.2 billion for House operations, $595 million for the Library of Congress, $519.6 million for the Government Accountability Office, $488.6 million for the Architect of the Capitol and $348 million for the Capitol Police.” According to the Congressional Research Service, “The Continuing Appropriations Act, 2014 (P.L. 113-46, Section 146, enacted October 17, 2013), prohibited the scheduled 2014 pay adjustment for Members of Congress.” A vote yes was a vote to block pay increases. The bill passed 285-144. [CRS, 6/21/16; CQ, 10/16/13; HR2775, Vote #550, 10/16/13] NOTE: When using this research, keep in mind that Meadows has also voted on various occasions against raising his own pay. Meadows Would Receive $17,748 Per Year In Taxpayer Funded Pension According to the Office of Personnel Management, a “Member of Congress or Congressional Employee (or any combination of the two) must have at least 5 years of service as a Member of Congress and/or Congressional Employee” to qualify for their retirement annuity. The annual pension is calculated as “1.7% of your high-3 average salary multiplied by your years of service as a Member of Congress or Congressional Employee which do not exceed 20, PLUS 1% of your high-3 average salary multiplied by your years of other service.” [Office of Personnel Management, accessed 7/18/17] For Members who joined after 1991, the annual pension is calculated as: [The Atlantic, 10/2/15; Congressional Research Service, 11/10/16] For any current Member eligible for their pension, their High-3 would be $174,000, making the formula: [$174,000 x .017 x Years of Service (Max 20)] + [$174,0000 x .01 x (Years of Service Over 20)] = Annual Pension Given Meadows’ three terms served, at the end of his current term, he would receive $$17,748 in annual taxpayer-funded pension. Meadows Voted To Undermine The Office Of Congressional Ethics 2016: Meadows Voted For Cutting More Than $190,000 From The Office Of Congressional Ethics Meadows Voted For Cutting More Than $190,000 From The Office Of Congressional Ethics. In June 2016, Meadows voted for an amendment to the Continuing Appropriations and Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2017, and Zika Response and Preparedness Act (HR 5325) that would “reduce funding for the Office of Congressional Ethics by $190,970, to the fiscal 2016 level, and transfer the same amount to the spending reduction account.” The amendment failed 137-270. [HR 5325, Vote #292, 6/10/16; CQ Floor Votes, 6/10/16] 2015: Meadows Voted For Limiting The Power Of The OCE And House Ethics In Investigating Members 2015: Meadows Voted For Limiting Power Of OCE And House Ethics In Investigating Members. In January 2015, Meadows voted for a House Rules package that contained a rules change that would help members under MARK MEADOWS (NC-11) Swamp Creature | 3 ethics investigations by the Office of Congressional Ethics and House Ethics Committee. “In one of its first actions of the new year, the House of Representatives on Tuesday approved rules changes that could give lawmakers a new defense against ethics investigations. The new language, added Monday night to the sections that establish the House Ethics Committee and the independent Office of Congressional Ethics, says the two bodies ‘may not take any action that would deny any person any right or protection provided under the Constitution of the United States.’ The language also states that a person subject to a review by the Office of Congressional Ethics ‘shall be informed of the right to be represented by counsel and invoking that right should not be held negatively against them.’ … ‘Clearly (the new language) was put in there to allow members of Congress to restrain certain activities of the ethics committees based on their own interpretation of what the Constitution means,’ said Craig Holman of the watchdog group Public Citizen.” The resolution passed, 234-172. [H Res 5, Vote #6, 1/6/15; USA Today, 1/6/15] Meadows Voted For Limiting Power Of OCE And House Ethics In Investigating Members. In January 2015, Meadows voted for a House Rules package that contained a rules change that would help members under ethics investigations by the Office of Congressional Ethics and House Ethics Committee. “In one of its first actions of the new year, the House of Representatives on Tuesday approved rules changes that could give lawmakers a new defense against ethics investigations. The new language, added Monday night to the sections that establish the House Ethics Committee and the independent Office of Congressional Ethics, says the two bodies ‘may not take any action that would deny any person any right or protection provided under the Constitution of the United States.’ The language also states that a person subject to a review by the Office of Congressional Ethics ‘shall be informed of the right to be represented by counsel and invoking that right should not be held negatively against them.’ … ‘Clearly (the new language) was put in there to allow members of Congress to restrain certain activities of the ethics committees based on their own interpretation of what the Constitution means,’ said Craig Holman of the watchdog group Public Citizen.” The resolution passed, 234-172. [H Res 5, Vote #6, 1/6/15; USA Today, 1/6/15] Meadows Received $85,039 In Privately-Funded Travel Meadows Received $85,039 In Privately-Funded Travel. As of April 2018, Meadows had gone on 13 privately funded trips, receiving a total of $85,039 in travel. [Political Moneyline, accessed 4/13/18] Meadows Privately-Funded Travel Dates Sponsor(s) Location(s) Total Amount 8/9 - 8/14/17 Aspen Institute Oslo, Norway $14,683 5/29 - 6/4/17 Aspen Institute Berlin, Germany $17,394 3/17 - 3/20/17 Club for Growth Palm Beach, FL $2,100 2/8 - 2/1017 Heritage Foundation New York, NY $1,089 12/2 - 12/3/16 Heritage Foundation Charlottesville, VA $1,763 11/17 - 11/18/16 Heritage Action for America San Antonio, TX $1,310 4/7 - 4/10/16 Heritage Foundation Amelia Island, FL $4,377 1/27 - 1/29/16 Heritage Foundation Middleburg, VA $960 10/12 - 10/19/15 Proclaiming Justice to the Nations Jerusalem, Israel $15,831 1/28 - 1/30/15 Heritage Foundation Middleburg, VA $1,469 2/15 - 2/23/14 American Israel Education Foundation Jerusalem, Israel $21,932 6/23 - 6/24/13 Humpty Dumpty Institute New York, NY $516 2/6 - 2/8/13 Heritage Foundation Baltimore, MD $1,615 Total: $85,039 [Political Moneyline, accessed 4/13/18] Meadows Consistently Voted With The Republican Establishment MARK MEADOWS (NC-11) Swamp Creature | 4 Meadows Has Voted With His Party 97% Of The Time Meadows Has Voted With The Republican Party 97% Of The Time. According to CQ in 2017, Meadows has voted with other members of the Republican Caucus 97% of the time. [CQ Vote Studies, accessed 4/13/18] Party Unity Year Support Oppose 2017 98% 2% 2016 98% 2% 2015 97% 3% 2014 97% 3% 2013 96% 4% Lifetime Average 97% 3% [CQ Vote Study, accessed 4/13/18] Meadows Voted With Paul Ryan 94% Of The Time Meadows Voted With Ryan 94% Of The Time. According to ProPublica, over his career, Meadows had voted with Speaker Ryan 94% of the time. [ProPublica, accessed 4/13/18] Vote Comparison Congress Total Votes Votes Disagreeing Percent Agreement 115th 21 7 67% 114th 571 39 93% 113th 1172 64 95% Lifetime Average 1764 110 94% [ProPublica, accessed 4/13/18] Voted To Elect Paul Ryan Speaker Of The House 2017: Voted To Make Rep. Paul Ryan Speaker Of The House. In January 2017, Meadows voted for Paul Ryan to be Speaker of the House. Ryan was elected by a vote of 239-189. [Election to the Speaker, Vote #2, 1/3/17; CQ, 1/3/17] 2015: Voted To Make Rep. paul Ryan Speaker Of The House. In October 2015, Meadows voted for Paul Ryan to be Speaker of the House.
Recommended publications
  • Metrics Undermine the 'Indiana Miracle'

    Metrics Undermine the 'Indiana Miracle'

    V19, N4 Thursday, Aug. 29, 2013 Metrics undermine the ‘Indiana miracle’ 9 years of GOP gubernatorial rule, legislative majorities don’t bring prosperity By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS – For several years now, it’s been called the “Indiana Miracle” and touted across the nation. Beginning with then-Gov. Mitch Daniels, Indiana became a bastion of low taxes, balanced budgets, a fully financed 10-year road plan, and job creation. With the torch passed to Gov. Mike Pence, the theme is now taking “In- diana from good to great.” But some of the metrics are dis- turbing and may no long support some of the claims, and that was reflected in Gov. Pence’s national Republican radio address last Saturday. The “good to great” talk was shunted aside as Pence made his case above the national average, which stands a full point lower against Obamacare, telling Americans, “Everywhere I go in at 7.4%. Indiana, I meet business owners and workers who are in The address came a day after a Ball State Univer- survival mode.” sity study revealed that Indiana’s per capita income has Pence’s address comes with the state mired in an 8.4% jobless rate – the 16th consecutive month it’s been Continued on page 4 Pencing on the Ritz By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS – Craig Hartzer is a long time Statehouse veteran who has seen and heard a lot, but what appeared late last Friday afternoon was something he had never witnessed: An Indiana governor standing in “Change does not come from front of his desk.
  • How Intense Policy Demanders Shape Postreform Politics: Evidence from the Affordable Care Act Philip B

    How Intense Policy Demanders Shape Postreform Politics: Evidence from the Affordable Care Act Philip B

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by epublications@Marquette Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Political Science Faculty Research and Publications Political Science, Department of 4-1-2018 How Intense Policy Demanders Shape Postreform Politics: Evidence from the Affordable Care Act Philip B. Rocco Marquette University, [email protected] Simon F. Haeder West Virginia University Accepted version. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, Vol. 43, No. 2 (April 1, 2018): 271-304. DOI. © 2018 Duke University Press. Used with permission. Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Political Science Faculty Research and Publications/College of Arts and Sciences This paper is NOT THE PUBLISHED VERSION; but the author’s final, peer-reviewed manuscript. The published version may be accessed by following the link in the citation below. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, Vol. 43, No. 2 (April, 2018): 271-304. DOI. This article is © Duke University Press and permission has been granted for this version to appear in e- Publications@Marquette. Duke University Press does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Duke University Press. Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Keywords ......................................................................................................................................................
  • The Irs's Systematic Delay and Scrutiny Of

    The Irs's Systematic Delay and Scrutiny Of

    THE IRS’S SYSTEMATIC DELAY AND SCRUTINY OF TEA PARTY APPLICATIONS HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JULY 18, 2013 Serial No. 113–51 Printed for the use of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.fdsys.gov http://www.house.gov/reform U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 82–435 PDF WASHINGTON : 2013 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Aug 31 2005 11:16 Sep 03, 2013 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 C:\DOCS\82435.TXT APRIL COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM DARRELL E. ISSA, California, Chairman JOHN L. MICA, Florida ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland, Ranking MICHAEL R. TURNER, Ohio Minority Member JOHN J. DUNCAN, JR., Tennessee CAROLYN B. MALONEY, New York PATRICK T. MCHENRY, North Carolina ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, District of JIM JORDAN, Ohio Columbia JASON CHAFFETZ, Utah JOHN F. TIERNEY, Massachusetts TIM WALBERG, Michigan WM. LACY CLAY, Missouri JAMES LANKFORD, Oklahoma STEPHEN F. LYNCH, Massachusetts JUSTIN AMASH, Michigan JIM COOPER, Tennessee PAUL A. GOSAR, Arizona GERALD E. CONNOLLY, Virginia PATRICK MEEHAN, Pennsylvania JACKIE SPEIER, California SCOTT DESJARLAIS, Tennessee MATTHEW A. CARTWRIGHT, Pennsylvania TREY GOWDY, South Carolina MARK POCAN, Wisconsin BLAKE FARENTHOLD, Texas TAMMY DUCKWORTH, Illinois DOC HASTINGS, Washington ROBIN L. KELLY, Illinois CYNTHIA M. LUMMIS, Wyoming DANNY K. DAVIS, Illinois ROB WOODALL, Georgia PETER WELCH, Vermont THOMAS MASSIE, Kentucky TONY CARDENAS, California DOUG COLLINS, Georgia STEVEN A.
  • The Tea Party Movement As a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014

    The Tea Party Movement As a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014

    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 10-2014 The Tea Party Movement as a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014 Albert Choi Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/343 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] The Tea Party Movement as a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014 by Albert Choi A master’s thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Political Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, The City University of New York 2014 i Copyright © 2014 by Albert Choi All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law. ii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Political Science in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Master of Arts. THE City University of New York iii Abstract The Tea Party Movement as a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014 by Albert Choi Advisor: Professor Frances Piven The Tea Party movement has been a keyword in American politics since its inception in 2009.
  • Election 2016 Section Frontline | Fall 2016 E-1 Election

    Election 2016 Section Frontline | Fall 2016 E-1 Election

    ELECTION 2016 SECTION FRONTLINE | FALL 2016 E-1 ELECTION Democratic Republican Clinton/Kaine Trump/Pence Tim Kaine Hillary Clinton Donald Trump Mike Pence PRESIDENT/VICE-PRESIDENT CANDIDATES of the United States of America he spring issue of FRONT LINE (presidential primary was March 15) raising of taxes, or national defense, the differences will make a significant impact documented Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump’s positions on issues. on the nation depending on who is ultimately elected. Since then, additional information has become available concerning Information is obtained from various reliable sources and presented through their backgrounds or stands on issues, which we have updated. the lens of the nation’s highest law: the United States Constitution. News sources TLibertarian Gary Johnson is now included in this summary, since he will be on all are footnoted; otherwise sources used were ProCon.org, Ballotpedia.com or the 50 state ballots. candidate’s websites. None of the information provided is intended, nor should it be This is not intended to be a comprehensive review, but it is a brief highlight construed, to be an endorsement of any party or candidate. It is presented to educate of what distinguishes each candidate. There are clear differences between the and inform our readers, so they can use their God-given discernment and exercise Democratic, Republican and Libertarian parties as well as the candidates themselves. their voting privilege for the good of the nation. We have not included candidates in (See Page E-5 for the comparisons of the Republican and Democrat Platforms.) this review who have not been certified for all 50 state ballots.
  • 2 Katie Bo Williams, Mystery Surrounds Sessions Appointee to FBI Investigation, the HILL (Apr

    2 Katie Bo Williams, Mystery Surrounds Sessions Appointee to FBI Investigation, the HILL (Apr

    December 18, 2018 VIA ONLINE PORTAL Douglas Hibbard Chief, Initial Request Staff Office of Information Policy U.S. Department of Justice 1425 New York Avenue NW, Suite 11050 Washington, DC 20530-0001 Via FOIAOnline Re: Freedom of Information Act Request Dear Mr. Hibbard: Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552, and the implementing regulations of the Department of Justice (DOJ), 28 C.F.R. Part 16, American Oversight makes the following request for records. In response to congressional demands, former Attorney General Jeff Sessions represented that he had ordered U.S. Attorney for the District of Utah John Huber to evaluate certain matters raised in letters from members of Congress—seemingly regarding DOJ actions related to the 2016 election and the actions of Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation.1 Despite the sensitive and politically-charged nature of Attorney General Sessions’s directive to U.S. Attorney Huber, little is known about the actual scope of Mr. Huber’s investigation.2 Representative Mark Meadows indicated that Mr. Huber would be testifying before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee’s Sub-Committee on Government Operations regarding his investigation, but Mr. Huber did not, in the end, offer public testimony.3 1 See Letter from Jeff Sessions, Attorney General, U.S. Dep’t of Justice, to Chuck Grassley, Chairman, U.S. Senate, Comm. on the Judiciary, Bob Goodlatte, Chairman, U.S. House of Representatives, Comm. on the Judiciary & Trey Gowdy, Chairman, U.S. House of Representatives, Comm. on Oversight & Government Reform, Mar. 29, 2018, https://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2018/images/03/29/ag.letter.re.ig.and.huber.reviews.pdf.
  • Download the Full What Happened Collection [PDF]

    Download the Full What Happened Collection [PDF]

    American Compass December 2020 WHAT HAPPENED THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY IN REVIEW AMERICAN COMPASS is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, launched in May 2020 with a mission to restore an economic consensus that emphasizes the importance of family, community, and industry to the nation’s liberty and prosperity— REORIENTING POLITICAL FOCUS from growth for its own sake to widely shared economic development that sustains vital social institutions; SETTING A COURSE for a country in which families can achieve self-sufficiency, contribute productively to their communities, and prepare the next generation for the same; and HELPING POLICYMAKERS NAVIGATE the limitations that markets and government each face in promoting the general welfare and the nation’s security. www.americancompass.org [email protected] What Happened: The Trump Presidency in Review Table of Contents FOREWORD: THE WORK REMAINS President Trump told many important truths, but one also has to act by Daniel McCarthy 1 INTRODUCTION 4 TOO FEW OF THE PRESIDENT’S MEN An iconoclast’s administration will struggle to find personnel both experienced and aligned by Rachel Bovard 5 A POPULISM DEFERRED Trump’s transitional presidency lacked the vision and agenda necessary to let go of GOP orthodoxy by Julius Krein 11 THE POTPOURRI PRESIDENCY A decentralized and conflicted administration was uniquely inconsistent in its policy actions by Wells King 17 SOME LIKE IT HOT Unsustainable economic stimulus at an expansion’s peak, not tax cuts or tariffs, fueled the Trump boom by Oren Cass 23 Copyright © 2020 by American Compass, Inc. Electronic versions of these articles with hyperlinked references are available at www.americancompass.org.
  • <Ttongress of Tbe Llntteb ~Tates

    <Ttongress of Tbe Llntteb ~Tates

    ELIJAH E CUMMINGS. MARYLAND ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS JIM JORDAN, OHIO CHAIRMAN RANKING MINORITY MEMBER <ttongress of tbe llntteb ~tates f!,ouse of ll\epresentatibes COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND REFORM 2157 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON, DC 20515-6143 M"'°"'' ' (2021225-5051 Mlt lOfllTY (202) 225-5074 http /l<Wefs,ght house.gov March 13, 2019 The Honorable Elijah E. Cummings Chairman Committee on Oversight and Reform 2157 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Mr. Chairman: This letter follows up on your commitment to ensure Michael Cohen testified truthfully at the Committee's hearing titled, "Hearing with Michael Cohen, Former Attorney for President Donald Trump," on February 27, 2019. 1 As Chairman, it is your obligation to ensure that witnesses are not permitted to lie with impunity when testifying before the Committee. During the hearing, following Cohen's oath to testify truthfully, you explained to the Committee that you privately admonished Cohen about truthfulness. You warned him "if he [Cohen] came in here and lied I would nail him to the cross."2 You then confirmed this statement with Cohen himself, asking "Didn' t I tell you that?'>:J Cohen replied, "Yes, you did more than once."4 Mr. Chairman, there is now clear and indisputable evidence that Cohen did not testify truthfully before the Committee. We expect you will now follow through with your commitment to hold Cohen accountable. Following the hearing, we wrote to Attorney General William Barr referring Cohen for a perjury investigation regarding six areas of problematic testimony, including Cohen's testimony that he did not want a role in the Trump Administration.5 In light of mounting evidence, it appears Cohen likely lied under oath during his appearance before the Committee.
  • Access to Care for 24 Million at Stake As Republicans Debate The

    Access to Care for 24 Million at Stake As Republicans Debate The

    March 14, 2017 2:00PM EST Access to Care for 24 Million at Stake as Republicans Debate the American Health Care Act The Congressional Budget Office releases evaluation of the American Health Care Act indicating serious access to care issue; moderate and conservative Congressional Republicans express a variety of concerns with the Act while the White House praises it On March 6, 2017, Republican House leadership unveiled their proposal, the American Health Care Act (the AHCA), to replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and modify Medicaid’s funding structure. After a week, the response to the AHCA has been mixed at best, with the bill finding critics from both sides of the aisle. In addition to the universal and expected criticism from Democrats, the proposal has faced resistance from both moderate and far-right conservative Republicans. On the far right, conservatives in the House and Senate have objected that the bill does not go far enough in deconstructing the ACA. Moderate Senate Republicans, meanwhile, are concerned with the impact it could have on access to care, particularly in regard to Medicaid expansion. President Trump has embraced the bill however, and expressed confidence that it will become law. Further complicating the political dynamic around the AHCA, on Monday, March 13, 2017, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released its evaluation of the proposal. In their report, the CBO concluded that the AHCA will reduce the federal deficit significantly, but it will also result in 24 million Americans losing health care coverage by 2026. CBO also noted that the AHCA will lead to severe cuts to Medicaid funding and an increase in premiums and cost sharing burdens for many Americans.
  • Self-Inflicted Wounds the 2013 Government Shutdown and the Internal Divisions of Congressional Republicans

    Self-Inflicted Wounds the 2013 Government Shutdown and the Internal Divisions of Congressional Republicans

    Self-Inflicted Wounds The 2013 Government Shutdown And The Internal Divisions Of Congressional Republicans Anssi Klemetti Pro Gradu Thesis Contemporary History The University of Turku January 2017 UNIVERSITY OF TURKU Department of Philosophy, Contemporary History and Political Science Faculty of Social Sciences KLEMETTI, ANSSI: Self-Inflicted Wounds. The 2013 Government Shutdown And The Internal Divisions Of Congressional Republicans. Pro Gradu Thesis, 102 pages, 6 annex pages. Contemporary History January 2017 Abstract: The aim of this thesis is to look into the 2013 government shutdown in the United States of America, which lasted from October 1 to October 16, with the purpose of studying the internal divisions that were created or made visible within the Congressional manifestation of the Republican Party. The main sources for the thesis are a pair of shutdown-inducing letters from Mark Meadows and Mike Lee to Congressional leaders, the final tallies of the votes that ended the shutdown, as well as media sources. The initial shutdown-related division was made apparent in the summer of 2013 between the 14 Senators and 80 Representatives supporting through the Meadows and Lee letters a "defunding strategy", which ultimately led to the shutdown, and the 32 Senators and 152 Representatives who opposed using said strategy to combat President Obama's healthcare reform. The final division was between the 18 Senators and 144 Representatives who opposed the final compromise that ended the shutdown and the 27 Senators and 87 Representatives who voted in favor of reopening the government. Republicans who did not sign one of the letters and who voted for the final compromise were more likely to have experience of previous government shutdowns; more likely to have seniority over their colleagues; more likely to be ideologically moderate; less likely to be affiliated with the Tea Party; and more likely to hail from competitive districts or states, while the opposite is true for the Republicans who had signed one of the letters and who opposed the final compromise.
  • NOTABLE NORTH CAROLINA 12 Things to Know About Former North

    NOTABLE NORTH CAROLINA 12 Things to Know About Former North

    NOTABLE NORTH CAROLINA 12 Things to Know About Former North Carolina 11th District Congressman and New Presidential Chief of Staff Mark Meadows1 Compiled by Mac McCorkle, B.J. Rudell, and Anna Knier 1. Friendship with His Recently Deceased Counterpart on the House Oversight Committee, Congressman Elijah Cummings (D‐MD) Despite political differences, Rep. Meadows and recently deceased Democratic Congressman Elijah Cummings (D‐MD) developed an uncommonly strong friendship that helped bridge partisan divides on the procedures of the House Oversight Committee. NPR | Washington Post 2. A Founder of the House Freedom Caucus Along with outgoing Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney (a former South Carolina congressman), Rep. Meadows was one of the nine founding members of the conservative House Freedom Caucus in January 2015. Time | Washington Post | Pew Research Center 3. Support for Governmental Shutdown in the Cause of Limited Government A GOP attempt to stop implementation of the Affordable Care Act resulted in a 16‐day government shutdown in October 2013. As a newly elected representative, Rep. Meadows helped galvanize the effort by circulating a letter urging the GOP House leadership to take action. The letter gained signatures of support from 79 GOP House members. CNN | Fox News | New York Daily News | Asheville Citizen‐Times 4. Meadows Versus GOP House Speaker John Boehner On July 28, 2015, Rep. Meadows introduced H. Res. 385 to “vacate the chair”—a resolution to remove Speaker John Boehner. No House member had filed such a motion since 1910. Boehner announced his resignation as Speaker less than two months later on September 25, 2015. New York Times | National Review | Ballotpedia 1 For historical background on recent chiefs of staff, see Chris Wipple, The Gatekeepers: How the White House Chiefs Define Every Presidency (2017).
  • The House Freedom Caucus: Extreme Faction Influence in the U.S

    The House Freedom Caucus: Extreme Faction Influence in the U.S

    The House Freedom Caucus: Extreme Faction Influence in the U.S. Congress Andrew J. Clarke∗ Lafayette College Abstract While political observers frequently attribute influence to ideological factions, politi- cal scientists have paid relatively little attention to the emergence of highly organized, extreme, sub-party institutions. In the first systematic analysis of the House Free- dom Caucus, I argue that non-centrist factions embolden lawmakers to push back against their political party by offsetting leadership resources with faction support. As a result, extreme blocs in the House of Representatives can more effectively dis- tort the party brand. To test these claims, I analyze the impact of Freedom Caucus affiliation on changes in legislative behavior and member-to-member donation pat- terns. I find that Republican lawmakers become (1) more obstructionist and (2) less reliant on party leadership donations after joining the conservative faction. These findings suggest that Freedom Caucus institutions empower lawmakers to more ag- gressively anchor the Republican Conference to conservative policy positions by off- setting the informational and financial deficits imposed by party leaders. ∗Assistant Professor, Department of Government & Law. [email protected], http://www. andrewjclarke.net 0 In 2015, the highly organized and deeply secretive House Freedom Caucus formed in the U.S. Congress. Journalists credited the faction with overthrowing the Speaker of the House, hand-packing his successor, and pushing the House Republican Conference to adopt an increasingly extreme and aggressive posture with the Obama administration — all within a year. Shortly after, Republicans won unified control of the federal government, and the Freedom Caucus quickly reasserted its role a major player in legislative affairs.