DOCSLIB.ORG

Exploring the Attitudes and Beliefs of Audiology Students About People Who Are Deaf Or Hard of Hearing Nancy Grosz Sager University of the Pacific, [email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Exploring the Attitudes and Beliefs of Audiology Students About People Who Are Deaf Or Hard of Hearing Nancy Grosz Sager University of the Pacific, Ngsager@Gmail.Com University of the Pacific Scholarly Commons University of the Pacific Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2019 Exploring the Attitudes and Beliefs of Audiology Students About People Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing Nancy Grosz Sager University of the Pacific, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uop_etds Part of the Education Commons Recommended Citation Sager, Nancy Grosz. (2019). Exploring the Attitudes and Beliefs of Audiology Students About People Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing. University of the Pacific, Dissertation. https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uop_etds/3563 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of the Pacific Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 EXPLORING THE ATTITUDES AND BELIEFS OF AUDIOLOGY STUDENTS TOWARDS PEOPLE WHO ARE DEAF OR HARD OF HEARING by Nancy Grosz Sager A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION Benerd School of Education Educational and Organizational Leadership University of the Pacific Stockton, CA 2019 2 EXPLORING THE ATTITUDES AND BELIEFS OF AUDIOLOGY STUDENTS TOWARDS PEOPLE WHO ARE DEAF OR HARD OF HEARING by Nancy Grosz Sager APPROVED BY: Dissertation Advisor: Rod P. Githens, Ph.D. Committee Member: Laura Hallberg, Ed.D. Committee Member: Nancy Delich, Ed.D. Committee Member: Stephen Roberts, Ph.D. Interim Department Chair: Rod P. Githens, Ph.D. Dean of Graduate School: Thomas H. Naehr, Ph.D. 3 EXPLORING THE ATTITUDES AND BELIEFS OF AUDIOLOGY STUDENTS TOWARDS PEOPLE WHO ARE DEAF OR HARD OF HEARING Copyright 2019 By Nancy Grosz Sager 4 DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated in the memory of my first sign language teacher, Bill White. 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many thanks go to my committee, Rod Githens, Laura Hallberg, Stephen Roberts, and Nancy Delich, as well as to former committee members, Christina Rusk and Sharla Berry. I am really indebted to my co-coders, Julie Rems-Smario and Michelle Barry, who ensured that my personal belief system did not color my research. Thanks to my whole cohort of peers for reading and providing feedback on parts of my research, and for encouraging me through tough times. Thanks also go to friends, including Cindy Farnham, Alice Dunbar, Nan Barker, Sheri Farinha, and Laura Petersen, who allowed me to bounce ideas off them. My undying gratitude goes to my cheerleaders – my daughters, Jeannette and Michelle, and my twin sister, Sandi. Thanks to my partner, Ken, who supported me this whole time. From afar, I thank my dad, Bob Grosz, who always encouraged me to do this, and my late husband, Victor, who I feel would be proud. 6 Exploring the Attitudes and Beliefs of Audiology Students Towards People Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing Abstract By Nancy Grosz Sager University of the Pacific 2019 This study was undertaken to explore and understand the attitudes and beliefs of audiology students about Deaf and Hard of Hearing people. The problem of practice was that some audiologists continue to advise parents not to sign with their Deaf or Hard of Hearing children. This problem was studied using the conceptual framework of General Systems Theory, looking at the problem through the lens of Critical Disability Theory, to determine if audiology students view Deaf and Hard of Hearing people from a medical model or from a social/cultural model. Using a qualitative case study methodology, I interviewed six first-year doctor of audiology (AuD) students at a university on the west coast of the United States to delve deeply into their attitudes and beliefs about Deaf and Hard of Hearing people. This study found that these audiology students had overall social/cultural attitudes about Deaf people on the Attitudes to Deafness Scale. Yet, in case-study interviews, which provided a more in-depth look at the views of the students, the terminology the students used demonstrated some institutionalized audist attitudes and beliefs. Every student showed a mixture of medical and social/cultural beliefs. The students made a distinction between the words “Deaf” and “Hard of Hearing.” All the students believed that parents of Deaf children should be offered “communication options” – (signed or spoken language). The four students who had studied 7 American Sign Language (ASL) and Deaf culture were more open to the use of ASL. The two students who had the lowest scores on the Attitudes to Deafness Scale had no experience or background in ASL and demonstrated a preference for amplification technology and spoken language. The students believed that Hard of Hearing children should be raised with spoken language only. The students had a positive attitude about ASL but demonstrated a preference for spoken language. The audiology students understood their role in the medical system, but did not yet understand their part in the Deaf education system. They believed that parent-to-parent support is important but did not understand how audiologists might collaborate with the Deaf community and with teachers of the Deaf as families journey through the process of raising Deaf and Hard of Hearing children. 8 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................. 11 LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................ 12 CHAPTER 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 13 Background ..................................................................................................... 14 Research Problem ............................................................................................ 15 Purpose of the Study ........................................................................................ 17 Research Question ........................................................................................... 17 The Significance of This Research .................................................................. 18 Conceptual Framework ................................................................................... 19 Description of the Study .................................................................................. 24 Delimitations ................................................................................................... 24 Summary ......................................................................................................... 25 Definition of Terms ......................................................................................... 27 2. Review of the Literature ........................................................................................ 29 A History of Deaf Education in the United States .......................................... 31 The Risks and Benefits of Sign Language ...................................................... 40 Attitudes About People Who Are Deaf ........................................................... 45 Measuring Attitudes Towards Deaf People ..................................................... 61 Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 64 3. Methodology ......................................................................................................... 66 9 Research Design .............................................................................................. 66 Reliability and Validity ................................................................................... 81 Trustworthiness ............................................................................................... 82 Threats to Validity ........................................................................................... 83 Limitations ....................................................................................................... 84 Ethical Considerations ..................................................................................... 84 Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 85 4. Findings ................................................................................................................. 87 Attitudes to Deafness Scale ............................................................................. 88 Interviews ........................................................................................................ 91 Analysis ........................................................................................................... 95 Artifacts ......................................................................................................... 129 Limitations of the Study ................................................................................ 134 Summary ....................................................................................................... 134 5. Summary, Conclusions, and Recommendations ................................................. 137 Summary ....................................................................................................... 137 Conclusions ..................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Read-My-Lips: a Multimedia Project for the Hearing
    JOAQUIN VILA and KATHLEEN M. AHLERS READ-MY -LIPS: A MULTIMEDIA PROJECT FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED Read-My-Lips is an interactive multimedia system designed to help instructors teach language and communication skills to the hearing-impaired. The system comprises three multimedia instructional modules. (1) Babel is an expert system that translates text to speech in any language that uses the Roman alphabet. This module depicts the process of speech by displaying a front view and a profIle cross view of a human face in synchronization with the output sounds of a speech synthesizer. (2) Read & See consists of a series of stories and games that are displayed with text and full video motion. Selected vocabulary within the story is signed and spoken using digitized video sequences. (3) Fingerspelling allows the student to request any word or number to be "fingerspelled." INTRODUCTION The computer has become a popular instructional tool available from the Alexander Graham Bell Association used in school programs for the hearing-impaired. l Many for the Deaf, use drill and practice methods for the computer programs are geared exclusively to the presen­ speech-reading of everyday utterances. tation and practice of academic content.2 Yet several As technology has improved, interactive video has software packages for the hearing-impaired focus on been used in designing speech-reading programs. A sys­ specific speech, speech-reading, and/or auditory skills. tem titled DAVID6 (dynamic audio video interactive de­ Hearing-impaired students have great difficulty master­ vice) was created in 1978. It requires students to view ing these skills because of their degree of hearing loss.
    [Show full text]
  • Poor Print Quality
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 476 841 FL 027 697 AUTHOR Kontra, Miklos TITLE British Aid for Hungarian Deaf Education from a Linguistic Human Rights Point of View. PUB DATE 2001-00-00 NOTE 9p.; An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Biennial Conference of the Hungarian Society for the Study of English (4th, Budapest, Hungary, January 28-30, 1999). Some parts contain light or broken text. PUB TYPE Journal Articles (080) Reports Descriptive (141) JOURNAL CIT Hungarian Journal of Applied Linguistics; vl n2 p63-68 2001 EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Deafness; Educational Discrimination; Elementary Secondary Education; Foreign Countries; Higher Education; *Oral Communication Method; *Sign Language; Speech Communication; Teaching Methods IDENTIFIERS *Hungary; United Kingdom ABSTRACT This paper discusses the issue of oral versus sign language in educating people who are deaf, focusing on Hungary, which currently emphasizes oralism and discourages the use of Hungarian Sign Language. Teachers of people who are hearing impaired are trained to use the acoustic channel and view signing as an obstacle to the integration of deaf people into mainstream Hungarian society. A recent news report describes how the British. Council is giving children's books to a Hungarian college for teachers of handicapped students, because the college believes in encouraging hearing impaired students' speaking skills through picture books rather than allowing then to use sign language. One Hungarian researcher writes that the use of Hungarian Sign Language hinders the efficiency of teaching students who are hard of hearing, because they often prefer it to spoken Hungarian. This paper suggests that the research obscures the difference between medically deaf children, who will never learn to hear, and hearing impaired children, who may learn to hear and speak to some extent.
    [Show full text]
  • Pigeonhole Podcast 18
    Pigeonhole Episode 18 [bright ambient music] Introduction CHORUS OF VOICES: Pigeonholed, pigeonhole, pigeonhole, pigeonhole, pigeonhole, pigeonhole, pigeonhole, pigeonhole. [mellow ambient music plays] CHERYL: Since this is a story-based podcast, I don’t have a lot of interviews. This interview is a rebroadcast from the old podcast from 2017 recorded by Skype. It’s been edited just a bit for length. Talila “TL” Lewis has been named a White House Champion of Change and was also named one of the Top 30 Thinkers Under 30 by Pacific Standard in 2015. Talila is an attorney-organizer and visiting professor at Rochester Institute of Technology and National Technical Institute for the Deaf who founded and works with the all-volunteer organization HEARD, which stands for Helping Educate to Advance the Rights of Deaf communities. HEARD focuses on correcting and preventing deaf wrongful convictions, ending abuse of incarcerated people with disabilities; decreasing recidivism rates for deaf returned citizens; and increasing representation of deaf people in professions that can counter mass incarceration and end the attendant school to prison pipeline. Talila created the only national database of deaf incarcerated individuals. This is something the jails and prisons aren’t tracking themselves. Talila also maintains contact with hundreds of deaf incarcerated individuals. TL also leads intersectional campaigns that advance the rights of multiply-marginalized people, including the #DeafInPrison Campaign, the Deaf Prisoner Phone Justice Campaign, and the American Civil Liberties Union’s “Know Your Deaf Rights” Campaign. The show page and transcript will have a link to the syllabus TL created and uses for a class called Disability Justice in the Age of Mass Incarceration.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Justice, Audism, and the D/Deaf: Rethinking Linguistic and Cultural Differences
    Social Justice, Audism, and the d/Deaf: Rethinking Linguistic and Cultural 65 Differences Timothy Reagan Contents Introduction ..................................................................................... 1480 An Introduction to the DEAF-WORLD ....................................................... 1482 Language .................................................................................... 1483 Cultural Identity ............................................................................. 1485 Behavioral Norms and Practices ............................................................ 1487 Endogamy ................................................................................... 1487 Cultural Artifacts ............................................................................ 1488 In-Group Historical Knowledge ............................................................ 1488 Voluntary Social Organizations ............................................................. 1489 Humor ....................................................................................... 1489 Literary and Artistic Tradition .............................................................. 1490 Becoming Deaf .............................................................................. 1494 The Duality of Deaf Identity ................................................................ 1494 Epistemology and the DEAF-WORLD ........................................................ 1495 Social Justice and the DEAF-WORLD .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Transition from Fingerspelling to English Print: Facilitating English Decoding
    The Transition From Fingerspelling to English Print: Facilitating English Decoding Tamara S. Haptonstall-Nykaza Colorado School for the Deaf and the Blind Brenda Schick University of Colorado, Boulder Fingerspelling is an integral part of American Sign Lan- orthography available in most written systems. Re- guage (ASL) and it is also an important aspect of becoming search on hearing children’s development of reading bilingual in English and ASL. Even though fingerspelling is has found strong connections between children’s pho- based on English orthography, the development of finger- spelling does not parallel the development of reading in nological systems and awareness of phonological reg- hearing children. Research reveals that deaf children may ularities and their ability to read (see Snow, Burns, & initially treat fingerspelled words as lexical items rather than Griffin, 1998). Typically, reading is viewed, in large a series of letters that represent English orthography and part, as reflecting English skills, and deaf children’s only later begin to learn to link handshapes to English gra- longstanding difficulties with learning to read are con- phemes. The purpose of this study is to determine whether a training method that uses fingerspelling and phonological sidered to be a problem with English (King & Quigley, patterns that resemble those found in lexicalized finger- 1985; Paul, 1998). More recently, researchers have be- spelling to teach deaf students unknown English vocabulary gun to investigate how American Sign Language, or would increase their ability to learn the fingerspelled and ASL, can support and facilitate reading in English (see orthographic version of a word. There were 21 deaf students (aged 4–14 years) who participated.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario's Seniors Strategy
    Email: [email protected] Website: seniorpridenetwork.com July 10, 2019 Ontario’s Seniors Strategy Consultation Seniors Policy and Programs Division Ministry for Seniors and Accessibility 777 Bay Street, Suite 601C Toronto, ON M7A 2J4 The Senior Pride Network (Toronto) welcomes this opportunity to provide input into the consultation on Ontario’s Seniors Strategy. The Senior Pride Network (Toronto) is an association of individuals and organizations committed to promoting appropriate services and a positive, caring environment for elders, seniors and older persons who identify as 2 Spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, transsexual, queer, intersex and other (2SLGBTTQI+). We envision a series of communities of 2SLGBTTQI+ elders, seniors and older persons that are respectful, affirming, supportive, safe and healthy. The Senior Pride Network (Toronto) asserts and advocates for the human, economic, social and cultural rights of 2SLGBTTQI+ elders, seniors and older persons. We seek to eradicate all forms of oppression including homophobia, heterosexism, lesbophobia, transphobia, biphobia, sexism, cissexism, racism, antisemitism, settler colonialism, xenophobia, islamophobia, ableism and ageism. We demand the right of all 2SLGBTTQI+ elders, seniors and older persons to live their lives free from discrimination, harassment, reprisal, bullying, intimidation, victimization, stigmatization, silencing, being marginalized or being made invisible. 2SLGBTTQI+ Elders, Seniors and Older Persons and Ontario’s Seniors Strategy 2SLGBTTQI+ elders, seniors and older persons face a number of issues that have impacted their lived experiences and may have negatively affected their mental or physical health, their financial and housing circumstances and their overall social well-being. Gaining an understanding of those issues and positively addressing them are necessary to developing and implementing an inclusive and effective Ontario’s Seniors Strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Attitudes Towards Individuals Who Are Deaf and Hard of Hearing
    ffff Attitudes towards individuals who are deaf and hard of hearing Introduction For individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing (DHH), negative attitudes from DHH and hearing individuals can serve as a barrier to healthy social and emotional development22, social integration17, and academic and career success 19. Societal attitudes toward individuals who are deaf is an important research topic because: Attitudes toward DHH individuals are critical aspects of integration into social and academic activities.23 Knowledge of attitudes toward individuals who are DHH contributes to understanding and positive interactions between hearing and DHH individuals.15 What does the research tell us about attitudes toward people who are DHH? Researchers have assessed attitudes toward individuals with disabilities, as well as deaf individuals specifically. Some findings include: Negative attitudes toward individuals with disabilities have existed throughout history and still exist today.8 There are differences in attitudes toward people who are deaf compared to people with other disabilities.16 Hearing people have been found to hold more negative attitudes toward individuals with an intellectual disability than toward individuals who are deaf.7,10 The relationship between attitudes and expectations “Attitudes toward Attitudes can be conveyed through expectations; people tend people with to internalize and fulfill the expectations others have of them.6 disabilities represent Parental expectations strongly influence their deaf childrens’ an individual’s
    [Show full text]
  • Intercultural Intervention in Bi-Cultural Family Contexts with Deaf and Hearing Members: A
    Intercultural Intervention in Bi-Cultural Family Contexts with Deaf and Hearing Members: A Thematic Analysis of Deaf Cultural Identity by Anita-Hosanna Kangabe Memoir submitted to the School of Social Work as part of the Master of Social Work Program Under the supervision of Marjorie Silverman University of Ottawa August 2019 Acknowledgements I wouldn’t have been able to complete this long journey without the endless support, encouragement and guidance of those closest to me. There are a few people I’d like to thank, for I couldn’t have done this without you. Dr. Marjorie Silverman, I appreciate all of the constant guidance, the time and the remarkable supervision you’ve given me. You’ve taught me so much, have helped me to believe in myself and to challenge myself. To my beloved parents, thank you for your unconditional love. Knowing that I’ve made you proud is everything to me. My fiancé, Romeo, you have been by my side every step of the way. I am forever grateful to you for your loving support. And to my sister Jocy, brothers Benjamin, Gilbert, Adelin and Orchide; I dedicate this work to you. You all hold a special place in my heart. Thank you to my maker, my God. i Abstract This exploratory research aims to analyse the applicability of intercultural approaches in family contexts with both hearing and deaf members. The study examines different perspectives of deafness, challenging the over-medicalization of deafness and seeking to review accessibility in practice. We discover alternatives through the innovative use of intercultural intervention outside of its usual ethno-cultural context where, instead, Deaf culture is concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • The Two Hundred Years' War in Deaf Education
    THE TWO HUNDRED YEARS' WAR IN DEAF EDUCATION A reconstruction of the methods controversy By A. Tellings PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/146075 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2020-04-15 and may be subject to change. THE TWO HUNDRED YEARS* WAR IN DEAF EDUCATION A reconstruction of the methods controversy By A. Tellings THE TWO HUNDRED YEARS' WAR IN DEAF EDUCATION A reconstruction of the methods controversy EEN WETENSCHAPPELIJKE PROEVE OP HET GEBIED VAN DE SOCIALE WETENSCHAPPEN PROEFSCHRIFT TER VERKRIJGING VAN DE GRAAD VAN DOCTOR AAN DE KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT NIJMEGEN, VOLGENS BESLUIT VAN HET COLLEGE VAN DECANEN IN HET OPENBAAR TE VERDEDIGEN OP 5 DECEMBER 1995 DES NAMIDDAGS TE 3.30 UUR PRECIES DOOR AGNES ELIZABETH JACOBA MARIA TELLINGS GEBOREN OP 9 APRIL 1954 TE ROOSENDAAL Dit onderzoek werd verricht met behulp van subsidie van de voormalige Stichting Pedon, NWO Mediagroep Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen PROMOTOR: Prof.Dr. A.W. van Haaften COPROMOTOR: Dr. G.L.M. Snik 1 PREFACE The methods controversy in deaf education has fascinated me since I visited the International Congress on Education of the Deaf in Hamburg (Germany) in 1980. There I was struck by the intemperate emotions by which the methods controversy is attended. This book is an attempt to understand what this controversy really is about I would like to thank first and foremost Prof.Wouter van Haaften and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Representation of Cued Speech in Teacher of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing Preparation Programs Aaron Rose
    Washington University School of Medicine Digital Commons@Becker Program in Audiology and Communication Independent Studies and Capstones Sciences 2010 Representation of Cued Speech in teacher of the deaf and hard of hearing preparation programs Aaron Rose Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/pacs_capstones Part of the Medicine and Health Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Rose, Aaron, "Representation of Cued Speech in teacher of the deaf and hard of hearing preparation programs" (2010). Independent Studies and Capstones. Paper 598. Program in Audiology and Communication Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine. http://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/pacs_capstones/598 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Program in Audiology and Communication Sciences at Digital Commons@Becker. It has been accepted for inclusion in Independent Studies and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Becker. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Representation of Cued Speech in Teacher of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing Preparation Programs By Aaron Rose An Independent Study Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Degree of: Masters of Science in Deaf Education Washington University School of Medicine Program in Audiology and Communication Sciences May 21, 2010 Approved by Heather Hayes, Ph.D., Independent Study Advisor Hilary Franklin, M.A., Secondary Reader Abstract This descriptive study investigates the representation of Cued Speech in teacher of the deaf preparation programs as well as attitudes towards inclusion of Cued Speech in those programs in the context of the 2004 reauthorization of IDEA. The issue of Cued Speech is discussed as a communication modality and implications for deaf education are presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Training Teachers and Parents on Verbal Communication Among
    rde iso rs, D De on a ti f Lawal et al., Commun Disord Deaf Stud Hearing a S c t i u n d u i e Aids 2016, 4:2 m s Journal of Communication Disorders, & m o H C e DOI: 10.4172/2375-4427.1000159 f a o r l ISSN: 2375-4427i n a g n r A u i d o s J Deaf Studies & Hearing Aids Research Article Open Access Training Teachers and Parents on Verbal Communication among Children with Hearing Impairment: Preliminary Results from Schools in Kenya Luqman Lawal1*, Mathew Karia2, Chalese Buttars3, Jeffery Larsen3, Wakisa Mulwafu4 and Kaitesi Mukara5 1Division of Health Policy and management, University of Minnesota School of Public health, MN, USA 2Department of Special needs, Speech Language Pathology program, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya 3Department of Communicative disorders and deaf education, Utah State University, UT, USA 4Department of ENT, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi 5College of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of ENT, University of Rwanda, Rwanda *Corresponding author: Luqman Lawal, Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public health, MN, USA, Tel: +16513075288; E-mail: [email protected] Received date: April 21, 2016; Accepted date: May 25, 2016; Published date: June 1, 2016 Copyright: © 2016 Lawal L, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Abstract Purpose: We sought to assess the outcome of training parents and teachers on verbal communication with children that have hearing impairment in selected schools in Kenya.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Brief: the Importance of Fingerspelling for Reading
    VISUAL LANGUAGE & VISUAL LEARNING NSF supported Science of Learning Center on Visual Language and Visual Learning, SBE-0541953, RESEARCH BRIEF: Gallaudet University. THE IMPORTANCE OF FINGERSPELLING FOR READING JULY 2010 Key Findings on the Importance of Fingerspelling for Reading: LEARNING FROM RESEARCH • Deaf families fingerspell to their deaf children when they are very young. • Early exposure to fingerspelling helps these children become better # 1 readers. • Fingerspelling, reading, and writing are interrelated. • Fingerspelling facilitates English vocabulary growth, and larger the lexicon, the faster new vocabulary is learned. • Fingerspelling positively correlates with stronger reading skills. Deaf Written by: and hard of hearing children who are good fingerspellers are good Sharon Baker, Ed.D. readers, and vice versa. 1 of 8 NSF SCIENCE OF LEARNING CENTER ON VISUAL LANGUAGE AND VISUAL LEARNING RESEARCH BRIEF NO. 1: THE IMPORTANCE OF FINGERSPELLING FOR READING Fingerspelling and American Sign hearing children from deaf families tend to read at Language higher levels than deaf and hard of hearing children from hearing families.11 Fingerspelling likely On the most simplistic level, fingerspelling can be contributes to this success. Unfortunately, young defined as the use of handshapes to represent deaf and hard of hearing children from hearing letters of the alphabet. Indeed, before the families are not generally given the same early complexity of fingerspelling was documented, learning opportunity. Indeed, the absence of researchers thought fingerspelling was merely a fingerspelling is particularly evident in preschools manual representation of English orthography for deaf and hard of hearing children.9 To 1 (print). They believed fingerspelling was primarily understand the role of fingerspelling in language for representing proper nouns or for English words acquisition and later literacy, it is important to 2,3 without a sign equivalent.
    [Show full text]